Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Aug 9;6:31396. doi: 10.1038/srep31396

Japanese secular trends in birthweight and the prevalence of low birthweight infants during the last three decades: A population-based study

Yo Takemoto 1, Erika Ota 2,a, Daisuke Yoneoka 3, Rintaro Mori 4, Satoru Takeda 1
PMCID: PMC4977558  PMID: 27503177

Abstract

Since low birthweight has been correlated with both neonatal and long-term health, we performed this epidemiological study to evaluate the Japanese secular trends in mean birthweight and the prevalence of preterm/term low birthweight infants during the last three decades. We used population-based birth certificate data from January 1979 to December 2010. Time trends were analysed using a linear regression model. During the study period, we observed a significant decrease in the mean birthweight for singleton live births (3,152 ± 436 g in 1979 and 3,018 ± 421 g in 2010 p < 0.001) and an increase in the prevalence of preterm/term low birthweight infants. A 96.3% increase in the proportion of term low birthweight infants was observed during the study period (2.7% in 1979 and 5.3% in 2010). In addition, an increased proportion of preterm/low birthweight infants born to younger women was observed (<35 years vs. ≥35 years). These trends may be related to changing patterns in Japanese women’s nutritional status and the relatively strict recommended limit on weight gain during pregnancy. Understanding the long-term trends for singleton births may allow us to identify the associated risk factors and reduce the future socioeconomic burden that is associated with low birthweight infants.

Several studies in developed countries have revealed increases in the mean birthweight and the proportion of high birthweight infants during recent decades1,2. In contrast, Japanese population-based data indicate that the mean birthweight has gradually declined from 3,200 g in 1979 to 3,020 g in 20093. Similar results (decreasing mean birthweight and increasing prevalence of low birthweight [LBW] infants) were observed in a Japanese study that was performed using data collected between 1980 and 2000 from the Children and Infant Survey dataset, which has been collected every 10 years since 19504. Mean birthweight significantly decreased from 3,189 ± 422 g in 1980 to 3,033 ± 429 g in 2000. Furthermore, the authors found that the prevalence of LBW infants increased from 4.2% in 1980 to 8.3% in 2000. These trends may have been related to increases in preterm deliveries and multiple gestations.

Birthweight is an important indicator of a newborn’s well-being, the intrauterine environment, and the mother’s nutritional status during pregnancy. In this context, the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease Theory states that a reduced birthweight is associated with both neonatal mortality and morbidity and also with long-term health conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and some cancers5,6,7. Thus, the recent increase in the prevalence of LBW infants may be associated with a significant socioeconomic burden in the future, despite the extremely low neonatal mortality rate in Japan8. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have examined secular trends among LBW infants or evaluated their potential causes using population-based data for singleton live births in Japan. Moreover, it is important to understand the secular trends for singleton births, as the proportion of singleton births remains very high (98.8% in 1979 and 98.1% in 2010)8. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess Japanese trends in mean birthweight and the prevalence of term and preterm LBW infants during the last three decades and clarify risk factors, such as parity and maternal age.

Results

Based on the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare data, we evaluated all singleton live births from 1979 to 2010 in Japan. Figure 1 shows the changes in mean birthweight, which decreased significantly from 3,152 ± 436 g in 1979 to 3,018 ± 421 g in 2010. The mean birthweight for male infants decreased from 3,193 ± 442 g in 1979 to 3,059 ± 427 g in 2010, and the mean birthweight for female infants decreased from 3,109 ± 426 g in 1979 to 2,974 ± 409 g in 2010 (Fig. 1 and Table 1).

Figure 1. Secular trends in mean birthweight over 30 years.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Table 1. Mean birthweight of singleton live birth and prevalences of preterm, low birthweight, and term low birthweight infants.

  1979 n = 1,638,371 1990 n = 1,215,492 2000 n = 1,184,171 2010 n = 1,068,051
Mean birthweight (g) ± SD
 Total* 3152 ± 436 3078 ± 429 3051 ± 420 3018 ± 421
 Male* 3193 ± 442 3118 ± 435 3090 ± 427 3059 ± 427
 Female* 3109 ± 426 3037 ± 418 3009 ± 409 2975 ± 409
Prevalence (%)
 Preterm 3.5 4.1 4.5 4.7
 LBW 4.5 5.6 7.4 8.3
 Term LBW 2.7 3.4 4.8 5.3
Open in a new tab

*p < 0.001.

The prevalences of preterm, term, and LBW births are shown in Fig. 2. The prevalence of preterm births increased by 34%, from 3.5% in 1979 to 4.7% in 2010. This increase might have contributed to the increased prevalence of LBW infants, although the prevalences of LBW and term LBW infants exhibited much more dramatic increases during the study period. The prevalence of LBW infants increased from 4.5% in 1979 to 8.3% in 2010, and the prevalence of term LBW infants increased from 2.7% in 1979 to 5.3% in 2010 (Fig. 2 and Table 1). Figure 3 shows that the proportion of infants with a birthweight from 1,500–2,500 g exhibited the greatest proportional increase, compared to infants with very LBW (<1,500 g) or extremely LBW (<1,000 g).

Figure 2. Secular trends in prevalence of preterm, LBW, and term LBW infants.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Figure 3. Secular trends in LBW infants according to their birthweight.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Table 2 shows the prevalences of LBW infants according to maternal age. The prevalence of LBW infants exhibited a 91.5% increase among 25–34-year old women (from 4.14% in 1979 to 7.93% in 2010). A relatively smaller increase (27.8%) was observed in the prevalence of LBW infants among mothers ≥35 years old (from 7.44% in 1979 to 9.54% in 2010).

Table 2. Prevalence of LBW infants according to maternal age.

Prevalence of LBW infants according to maternal age (%)
  1979 1990 2000 2010
Age <25 years
 <1.0 (kg) 0.06 0.16 0.18 0.26
 <1.5 0.29 0.48 0.49 0.58
 <2.5 5.04 6.48 7.73 8.25
Age 25–34 years
 <1.0 (kg) 0.07 0.13 0.17 0.21
 <1.5 0.28 0.39 0.45 0.50
 <2.5 4.14 5.22 7.14 7.93
Age ≥35 years
 <1.0 (kg) 0.19 0.31 0.29 0.37
 <1.5 0.76 0.84 0.82 0.90
 <2.5 7.44 7.17 8.53 9.51
Open in a new tab

To evaluate the association between maternal age and the prevalence of preterm/LBW infants, the AORs for women ≥35 years old are shown in Table 3. After adjusting for infant sex and birthplace, we found that the odds ratios for preterm births among women ≥35 years old steadily decreased from 2.14 (95% CI: 2–2.28) to 1.50 (95% CI: 1.46–1.55) among nulliparous women and from 2.15 (95% CI: 2.07–2.22) to 1.30 (95% CI: 1.26–1.33) among multiparous women. Similar trends were observed in the AORs for LBW infants among women ≥35 years old, which significantly decreased from 2.06 (95% CI: 1.95–2.18) to 1.34 (95% CI: 1.31–1.37) among nulliparous women and from 1.90 (95% CI: 1.83–1.97) to 1.21 (95% CI: 1.18–1.24) among multiparous women (Table 3).

Table 3. Adjusted odds ratio of women ≥35 years compared to women <35 years.

Adjusted Odds Ratio of women ≥35 years (95% CI)
  1979 1990 2000 2010
Preterm
 Primiparous 2.14 (2–2.28) 2.01 (1.91–2.12) 1.67 (1.60–1.74) 1.50 (1.46–1.55)
 Multiparous 2.15 (2.07–2.22) 1.67 (1.62–1.73) 1.39 (1.35–1.43) 1.30 (1.26–1.33)
LBW
 Primiparous 2.06 (1.95–2.18) 1.69 (1.62–1.77) 1.48 (1.44–1.53) 1.34 (1.31–1.37)
 Multiparous 1.90 (1.83–1.97) 1.42 (1.38–1.46) 1.20 (1.17–1.23) 1.21 (1.18–1.24)
Open in a new tab

Dependent variable: Preterm birth/LBW.

Explanatory variables: infant sex, birthplace (urban area: 1, rural area: 0), and maternal age (≥35 years: 1, <35 years: 0).

Discussion

The present epidemiological study evaluated Japanese secular trends in birthweight and the prevalence of LBW infants using population-based data from 1979–2010. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report regarding these trends among Japanese singleton live-birth infants. The present study revealed that the prevalence of term LBW infants (relatively mature, but <2,500 g) increased during the last three decades. Interestingly, the mean maternal height during this period increased significantly from 155.0 ± 5.1 cm in 1980 to 157.9 ± 5.3 cm in 2000, which has been accompanied by a Westernization of the Japanese lifestyle and eating habits4. Moreover, the prevalence of shorter mothers (<150 cm) decreased from 14.5% in 1980 to 4.6% in 20004. In contrast, we found that the mean birthweight for singleton infants decreased, and the prevalence of term LBW infants increased, although other developed countries have experienced increases in mean birthweight1,2.

A previous Japanese study evaluated a smaller dataset from the Children and Infant Growth Survey (n = 11,746) and found that the proportion of LBW infants increased between 1980 and 2000. The authors also found that a low pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and low maternal weight gain during pregnancy were risk factors for LBW4. Furthermore, the prevalence of underweight Japanese women (BMI of <18.5 kg/m2) who were of reproductive age increased significantly during the study period. Specifically, the prevalence of underweight among 20–29-year-old women increased from 13.1% in 1980 to 29.0% in 2010, and the prevalence among 30–39-year-old women increased from 7.9% in 1980 to 14.4% in 20109. In some previous studies, maternal undernutrition was associated with increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth and LBW, though the mechanisms are still not clear10,11.

Low pre-pregnancy BMI and inadequate weight gain during pregnancy were associated with spontaneous preterm birth and foetal growth restriction. In underweight women, lower plasma volume results in a lower uteroplacental blood flow, which causes decreased transfer of nutrients to the foetus and a reduction in foetal growth10. In addition, maternal malnutrition is associated with deficiencies of multiple micronutrients. A previous review showed that decreased micronutrients correlated with increases in clinical infections, which could be a significant cause of spontaneous preterm birth11.

In Japan, pregnant women with BMIs from 18.5–25 kg/m2 are recommended to limit their weight gain to 7–12 kg during pregnancy12. In contrast, the recommended weight gain in the US is 11.3–15.9 kg for women in the same BMI group13. Moreover, the recommended weight gain is 9–12 kg for Japanese women with BMIs <18.5 kg/m2, compared to 12.7–18.1 kg for the same group in the US. Although these recommendations aim to achieve an appropriate birthweight for the child’s gestational age at birth, it is clear that Japan recommends stricter limiting of weight gain during pregnancy, compared to other developed countries13,14. In this context, pregnant Japanese women are expected to weigh themselves at every perinatal check-up and receive dedicated attention from their care provider during the entire pregnancy. Moreover, the majority of Japanese women believe that carrying a smaller baby would ensure a smooth delivery15, which can lead them to avoid extra weight gain during their pregnancy. However, a previous study found that women with weight gains <8 kg had a 2-fold higher risk of delivering a baby that was small for gestational age, compared to women with weight gains of 10.1–12.0 kg15. Therefore, it is possible that the increasing incidence of underweight Japanese women who are of reproductive age and their concern for weight gain during pregnancy may have contributed to the increasing prevalence of term LBW infants in Japan.

The present study also found that the risks of LBW and preterm birth were higher among women who were ≥35 years old, compared to younger women, although the adjusted odds ratio gradually decreased during the study period.

In this context, pregnancy at an older age has been considered a risk factor for adverse obstetric outcomes, such as LBW and preterm births16. In addition, the proportion of women who experience their first pregnancy after their mid-30s has gradually increased since the 1970s7. Previous studies have found that older mothers, and especially older primiparous mothers, are more likely to experience several obstetric complications, which can increase the risk of adverse outcomes for their infants. Moreover, older women are more likely to become pregnant after using ART because of their declining fertility, and several studies have found that the prevalences of preterm and LBW births are higher among women who used ART, compared to women who conceived naturally17,18,19. Although the proportion of ART-related births among older women has markedly increased during the study period, the risk of LBW and preterm births among older women has gradually approached that of younger women. In fact, Japanese vital statistic data showed a dramatic increase in the proportion of mothers over 35 years, from 4.2% in 1980 to 23.8% in 20103. However, we found that the increase in prevalence of LBW infants among older mothers remained small, compared to that of younger mothers, and the gap in AOR for LBW infants has become smaller in recent years. This might be partially explained by the increasing risks among younger women. Despite the concern regarding obesity in most developed countries, Japanese population-based analyses have revealed a significant decrease in BMI and high incidences of low BMI, among 15–29-year-old women between 1979 and 200020. Another study by the same group also found that younger women exhibited a greater desire to lose weight and greater concern regarding body image after childbirth16. Thus, the Health Japan 21 plan was released in 200021, which aimed to promote health in the Japanese population. Its two specific goals were to reduce the prevalence of underweight 20–29-year-old women to <15% and to increase awareness regarding optimal weight by 2010. However, recent population-based data indicate that there have only been small changes in the prevalence of underweight young women from baseline21. Thus, increase in the risk of preterm and LBW births among younger women may be related to undernutrition and thinness, which may partially explain the decreasing odds ratios that we observed for these birth outcomes among older women.

The present study is limited by inadequate information regarding obstetric (e.g., using of ART), anthropometric, and socioeconomic characteristics of the parents and their infants. Furthermore, although we evaluated birth certificate data for all live births in Japan during the study period, we were only able to collect data regarding the place of birth, birthweight, maternal age, gestational age at birth, and parents’ occupation(s). Therefore, to accurately identify potential risk factors that explain the recent increases in LBW and preterm births, further studies must consider more detailed information that could affect obstetric outcomes, such as maternal BMI, weight gain during pregnancy, pregnancy complications, smoking status, and mode of delivery. Identification of these risk factors may facilitate the development of effective strategies to prevent further increases in LBW and preterm births in Japan.

In conclusion, the present study evaluated a Japanese dataset from 1979–2010 and identified trends of decreasing mean birthweight and increasing prevalence of LBW infants, especially for term LBW infants. We also found an increased risk of LBW infants, especially among women who were <35 years old. These trends may be related to changing patterns in young women’s anthropometric characteristics, lifestyles, and nutritional statuses. Additional studies are needed to identify the relevant risk factors, as their identification may help reduce the unnecessary long-term socioeconomic burden that is associated with LBW infants.

Methods

Birth certificate data from January 1, 1979 to December 31, 2010 were obtained from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, which performs national population-based surveys each year8. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of Declaration of Helsinki. Since government approval had been granted to use birth certificates with anonymous secondary data, approval by institutional review boards was not sought. We only considered data for singleton births to avoid the bias of a higher risk of LBW for multiple births, and several demographic variables were extracted for the analyses. Based on birthweight, every infant was categorized as LBW (a birthweight of <2,500 g) or normal birthweight (a birthweight of ≥2,500 g). Furthermore, every infant was also categorized based on gestational age as preterm (a gestational age of <37 weeks) or term (a gestational age of ≥37 weeks). Time trends were analysed using a linear regression model.

Logistic regression analyses were performed for each year to assess the association between maternal age and LBW/preterm births. According to maternal parity, adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for preterm birth and having a LBW infant were calculated as coefficient estimates for older mothers by using the following explanatory variables: infant sex, birthplace (urban area: 1, rural area: 0), and maternal age (≥35:1, <35:0). Birthplace is important for analysis, as maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, total weight gain during pregnancy, duration of pregnancy, and rate of Caesarean section were shown to be significantly different between rural and urban areas in Japan22. Urban areas were defined based on their designation as a city or special ward, and all other areas were defined as rural areas. In addition, we assessed the AOR for maternal parity because older mothers, and especially older primiparous mothers, are more likely to experience several obstetric complications, which can increase the risk of preterm birth and having a LBW infant9. To evaluate the secular trend in the risk of delivery for older mothers, the estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for maternal age were plotted using locally weighted polynomial regression as a smoothing technique. All database manipulations were performed by SQL and AWK using R software (version 3.1.2).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Takemoto, Y. et al. Japanese secular trends in birthweight and the prevalence of low birthweight infants during the last three decades: A population-based study. Sci. Rep. 6, 31396; doi: 10.1038/srep31396 (2016).

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists B [grant number 26860428] and by Clinical Research Program for Child Health and Development, AMED.

Footnotes

Author Contributions Y.T. wrote the main manuscript. D.Y. performed the simulation and data analysis. E.O. planned the project, provided guidance on project design, supervised the study, and interpreted the data. R.M., E.O. and T.S. assisted in manuscript revision. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

References

  1. Ananth C. V. & Wen S. W. Trends in fetal growth among singleton gestations in the United States and Canada, 1985 through 1998. Semin. Perinatol. 26, 260–267 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kramer M. S. et al. Why are babies getting bigger? Temporal trends in fetal growth and its determinants. J. Pediatr. 141, 538–542, 10.1067/mpd.2002.128029 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Statistics and Information Department, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Vital Statistics of Japan 1980–2010 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  4. Takimoto H., Yokoyama T., Yoshiike N. & Fukuoka H. Increase in low-birthweight infants in Japan and associated risk factors, 1980–2000. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 31, 314–322, 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00294.x (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barker D. J. P. & Osmond C. Infant mortality, childhood nutrition, and ischaemic heart disease in England and Wales. The Lancet 327, 1077–1081 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jaddoe V. W. & Witteman J. C. Hypotheses on the fetal origins of adult diseases: contributions of epidemiological studies. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 21, 91–102, 10.1007/s10654-005-5924-5 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Risnes K. R. et al. Birthweight and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 40, 647–661, 10.1093/ije/dyq267 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Vital statistics report (2015).
  9. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. National Nutrition Survey in Japan, 2011 (2011).
  10. Neggers Y. et al. Some Thoughts on Body Mass Index, Micronutrient Intakes and Pregnancy Outcome. J. Nutr. 133, 1737S–1740S (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldenberg R. L. et al. The Plausibility of Micronutrient Deficiency in Relationship to Perinatal Infection. J. Nutr. 133, 1645S–1648S (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. National plan of the early 21st century for the health of mothers and children, 2001 to 2010 (2010).
  13. Rasmussen K. M. & Yaktine A. L. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. In: Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. (National Academies Press, 2009). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rasmussen K. M., Catalano P. M. & Yaktine A. L. New guidelines for weight gain during pregnancy: what obstetrician/gynecologists should know. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 21, 521–526, 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328332d24e (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Takimoto H., Mitsuishi C. & Kato N. Attitudes toward pregnancy related changes and self-judged dieting behavior. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 20, 212–219 (2011). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Laopaiboon M. et al. Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment. BJOG. 121 (Suppl 1), 49–56, 10.1111/1471-0528.12659 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tanbo T., Dale P. O., Lunde O., Moe N. & Abyholm T. Obstetric outcome in singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction. Obstet. Gynecol. 86, 188–192 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tan S. L. et al. Obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilization pregnancies compared with normally conceived pregnancies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 167, 778–784 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pandey S., Shetty A., Hamilton M., Bhattacharya S. & Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 18, 485–503, 10.1093/humupd/dms018 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Takimoto H., Yoshiike N., Kaneda F. & Yoshita K. Thinness among young Japanese women. Am. J. Public Health. 94, 1592–1595 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Health Japan 21: Report on Health Japan 21 Plan Study Committee & Health Japan 21 Plan Development Committee. (Taiyou Bijyutsu Co., 2000). [Google Scholar]
  22. Takimoto H. et al. Maternal antenatal body mass index gains as predictors of large-for-gestational-age infants and cesarean deliveries in Japanese singleton pregnancies. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 37, 6, 553–562, 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01396.x (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES