Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1982 Jul;35(7):761–763. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.7.761

Comparison of the Trucut and Surecut liver biopsy needles.

E R Littlewood, I T Gilmore, I M Murray-Lyon, K R Stephens, F J Paradinas
PMCID: PMC497774  PMID: 7096599

Abstract

The Trucut and Surecut liver biopsy needles have been compared in a prospective randomised study. Although the Surecut specimens were longer and heavier they tended to fragment during processing. Trucut specimens were subject to less artefact and were rated more highly by the histopathologist. However, the majority of biopsies obtained by both needles were satisfactory for diagnostic purposes.

Full text

PDF
761

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atterbury C. E., Enriquez R. E., Desuto-Nagy G. I., Conn H. O. Comparison of the histologic and cytologic diagnosis of liver biopsies in hepatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 1979 Jun;76(6):1352–1357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bateson M. C., Hopwood D., Duguid H. L., Bouchier I. A. A comparative trial of liver biopsy needles. J Clin Pathol. 1980 Feb;33(2):131–133. doi: 10.1136/jcp.33.2.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hølund B., Poulsen H., Schlichting P. Reproducibility of liver biopsy diagnosis in relation to the size of the specimen. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1980;15(3):329–335. doi: 10.3109/00365528009181479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Perrault J., McGill D. B., Ott B. J., Taylor W. F. Liver biopsy: complications in 1000 inpatients and outpatients. Gastroenterology. 1978 Jan;74(1):103–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rake M. O., Ansell I. D., Murray-Lyon I. M., Williams R. Improved liver-biopsy needle. Lancet. 1969 Dec 13;2(7633):1283–1283. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)90814-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES