Skip to main content
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences logoLink to The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
. 2016 Mar 8;71(9):1195–1201. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw020

Assessment of the Effects of Age, Gender, and Exercise Training on the Cardiac Sympathetic Nervous System Using Positron Emission Tomography Imaging

Gwen M Bernacki 1, Samira Bahrainy 1,, James H Caldwell 1,2,3, Wayne C Levy 1, Jeanne M Link 4, John R Stratton 1
PMCID: PMC4978358  PMID: 26957471

Abstract

Background:

Using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, we sought to determine whether normal age or exercise training cause changes in the cardiac sympathetic nervous system function in male or female healthy volunteers.

Methods:

Healthy sedentary participants underwent PET studies before and after 6 months of supervised exercise training. Presynaptic uptake by the norepinephrine transporter-1 function was measured using PET imaging of [11C]-meta-hydroxyephedrine, a norepinephrine analog, and expressed as a permeability–surface area product (PSnt in mL/min/mL). Postsynaptic function was measured as β-adrenergic receptor density (β′max in pmol/mL tissue) by imaging the β-receptor antagonist [11C]-CGP12177. Myocardial blood flow (MBF in mL/min/mL tissue) was measured by imaging [15O]-water.

Results:

At baseline, there was no age difference in β′max or MBF but PSnt declined with age (1.12±0.11 young vs 0.87±0.06 old, p = .036). Before training, women had significantly greater MBF (0.87±0.03 vs 0.69±0.03, p < .0001) and PSnt (1.14±0.08 vs 0.75±0.07, p < .001) than men. Training increased VO2 max by 13% (p < .0001), but there were no training effects on β′max, PSnt, or MBF. Greater MBF in females and a trend to increased PSnt post-training persisted.

Conclusion:

With age, presynaptic uptake as measured by PSnt declines, but there were no differences in β′max. Endurance training significantly increased VO2 max but did not cause any changes in the measures of cardiac sympathetic nervous system function. These findings suggest that significant changes do not occur or that current PET imaging methods may be inadequate to measure small serial differences in a highly reproducible manner.

Keywords: Sympathetic nervous system, Age, Exercise


One of the hallmarks of normal cardiovascular age among men is a reduced response to β-adrenergic stimulation; this is manifested as decreased heart rate, ejection fraction, and cardiac output responses to the β-adrenergic stimulant isoproterenol and to exercise stress (1–7). By comparison, when old and young men exercise in the presence of β-adrenergic blockade, the age-related differences in myocardial contractility, heart rate, and cardiac output are blunted; this further suggests that the age-associated declines during exercise are a manifestation of reduced β-adrenergic responsiveness (8,9). Endurance exercise training reverses, in part, the age-associated changes in cardiovascular function and improves responsiveness to β agonists in young men, but whether similar favorable changes occur in others is largely unknown (10–13). No in vivo human studies of the effect of exercise training on the cardiac β-adrenergic system exist.

The reduced β-adrenergic responsiveness of age is a major cause of the decline in cardiovascular responses to stress with age and may increase susceptibility to age-associated cardiovascular disease (8,9,14). Sympathetic function is abnormal in congestive heart failure patients, who demonstrate increased sympathetic nerve activity, norepinephrine (NE) plasma levels, cardiac NE spillover, and depleted cardiac NE stores (14). The basis or mechanism of the reduced β agonist responsiveness with age has not been well elucidated, but changes in the β-effector system could be secondary to altered presynaptic or postsynaptic cardiac sympathetic function (14).

Studies of animal cardiac β-adrenergic receptors and human peripheral lymphocyte β-adrenergic receptors do not reflect changes in human cardiac β-adrenergic activity (15–20). Many animal studies of myocardium were conducted in rats, animals with myocardium primarily comprise α-1 receptors (21–32). In contrast, human myocardium predominantly comprises β-1 receptors. Comparisons of studies of human peripheral lymphocytes to human myocardium are also limited in that human peripheral lymphocytes do not contain β-1 receptors nor are they innervated (33–35). Thus, prior studies in both animals and human lymphocytes have limited applicability to the human heart. In addition, conclusions from prior studies of human cardiac tissue have been limited by the subpopulation examined (14,20,36,37). Furthermore, results from these studies of diseased and in vitro transplant myocardium are conflicting, highlighting the need for study of healthy individuals’ in vivo myocardium.

Finally, gender differences in resting cardiovascular function exist with age. One study showed women to have a decrease in resting cardiac output and increased systemic vascular resistance with age; this change was not observed in men (38). Gender differences in autonomic nervous system regulation of the heart and circulation at rest may exist and at least partly explain these differences in cardiovascular function (39). Whether gender differences in autonomic function occur with age, exercise, or exercise training has not been well studied.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that cardiac β-receptor downregulation and presynaptic upregulation occur with age in vivo. We further hypothesized that there are no gender differences in β-adrenergic reception density (β′max) and NE transport-1 function. Finally, we hypothesized that endurance training improves cardiac β-adrenergic responsiveness by alterations in the cardiac sympathetic nervous system (SNS) measured by positron emission tomography (PET).

Materials and Methods

Two volunteer populations, healthy young (18–33 years) and healthy older (65–80 years) individuals were studied. These healthy men and women were screened to exclude (i) significant or exercise limiting cardiovascular disease including myocardial infarction, angina, claudication, significant valvular heart disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, stroke, or transient ischemic attacks; (ii) weight >150% ideal body weight; (iii) significant or exercise limiting pulmonary or orthopedic disease (including severe osteopenia); (iv) active or limiting arthritis; (v) diabetes mellitus (fasting plasma glucose > 140mg/dL); (vi) significant hypertension (>140/90, untreated); (vii) psychiatric disease or dementia that would limit participation or cooperation; (viii) excessive alcohol intake (greater than two drinks/day); (ix) tobacco use; (x) abnormal liver function or other screening tests; (xi) regular exercise in the last 12 months (greater than two times per week, 20 minutes per session); (xii) pregnancy; (xii) abnormal resting electrocardiogram; and (xiv) chronic use of any prescription medication except for treated hypothyroidism and estrogen replacement therapy, which all older females received.

All had unremarkable blood counts, urinalysis, and chemistries, including cholesterol and thyroid-stimulating hormone, as well as normal two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiograms for age. The old group also had normal maximal postexercise SPECT 99mTc-sestamibi images. Twenty-four young volunteers, 10 males (mean age ± SD, 24.9±3.6 years) and 14 females (mean age ± SD, 26.1±4.0 years) participated. Thirty-three older volunteers, 14 males (mean age ± SD, 70.3±4.45 years) and 19 females (mean age ± SD, 70.7±4.5 years) were studied. All of our participants were Caucasian. All older females were receiving hormone replacement therapy. This study was approved by the University of Washington Human Subjects, Radioactive Drug Research and Radiation Safety Committees. All participants gave written informed consent.

Study Protocol

Radiotracer synthesis

15O-water (40), [11C]-meta-hydroxyephedrine (11C-mHED) (41), and the β-adrenergic receptor (BAR) antagonist (S)-(–)-11C-CGP12177 ((S)-4-(3′-t-butylamino-2′-hydroxypropoxy)-benzimidazol-2-11C-one), 11C-CGP12177 (11C-CGP) (42–44) were synthesized according to published methods (45,46). Metabolites of 11C-mHED were measured as reported (47). (S)-(–)-CGP12177 is not metabolized in humans (48). The amount of nonradioactive material in the 11C-CGP and the 11C-mHED injectates was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (ES+) detection (Waters 2190 and Micromass ZMD) (49).

Imaging protocol

Heart rate and blood pressure were monitored continuously and recorded each minute from 5 minutes before to 15 minutes after each radiotracer injection. The participants were positioned in the tomograph (Advance; GE Healthcare) using 1-minute transmission scans to localize the heart (35 planes, 15cm). Twenty-minute transmission scans were acquired using a rotating 68Ge rod source. The imaging protocol consisted of sequential injections of high-specific-activity 11C-CGP followed approximately 20 minutes later by injection of low-specific-activity 11C-CGP as described previously (46) followed by 15O-water and 11C-mHED. Activity (mCi) of each injection was measured using a calibrated ion chamber.

For the first CGP injection, dynamic PET images (60s × 1, 5s × 2, 10s × 6, 15s × 6, 30s × 4, 60s × 15) were acquired for 21 minutes, starting 1 minute before the first CGP injection (CGP1). Low-specific-activity CGP (CGP2) was injected 25 minutes after the CGP1 injection. The CGP1 dynamic image sequence was repeated and continued for 45 minutes by adding 5-minute frames. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured with an intravenous injection of 15O-water. Dynamic PET images were acquired for 5 minutes. After 15 minutes for 15O decay, 11C-mHED was infused with the dynamic PET image acquisition sequence as for CGP2. The 11C-CGP and 11C-mHED were injected over 1 minute. Participants remained in the tomograph for the entire imaging protocol. Heparinized plasma samples at ~5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes after 11C-mHED injection were analyzed for 11C-mHED and metabolites (47).

The dynamic PET image sets were reconstructed, reoriented into short-axis cardiac projections, and analyzed. Images were decay corrected to the time of each radiotracer injection, except for the CGP2 images, which were corrected to the start of the CGP1 injection. Myocardial and left atrial (LA) regions of interest (ROIs) were placed on static short-axis images from each set. These ROIs were applied to the dynamic images and time–activity curves generated for 3 middle LA planes and 96 myocardial ROIs per heart (12 slices with 8 sectors per slice). Three LA planes were averaged to provide a single LA time–activity curve for each image set; this was used as the input function for the respective model analysis described below. The three most apical left ventricle planes were excluded from analysis to avoid any partial-volume effect from this region. After quantitative analysis of the remaining individual ROIs, the slice data were averaged to give three cross-section slices labeled apical, mid, and basal. Then, two adjacent sector’s ROIs were averaged to give four regions per slice: anterior, lateral, inferior, and septal. This resulted in 12 left ventricle ROIs and a global ROI (average of the 12) per participant for each of the 4 radiopharmaceutical injections.

The 15O-water time–activity curves (cpm/pixel) from the LA and from each of the individual left ventricle ROIs were modeled to obtain MBF (50). The 11C-CGP time–activity curve data were converted to pmol/mCi at the time of first injection based on the specific activity of the injectate.

Supervised training protocol

All participants participated in walking, jogging, and/or bicycling sessions supervised by an exercise physiologist 3 days per week for 6 months. Sessions began with 10–15 minutes of stretching followed by a 5-minute warm-up of slow walking, jogging, or bicycling; this was followed by a 30- to 45-minute period of training at the specified training intensity. The ratio of walk/jog to bicycling was 2:1. A 10-minute cooling period that included more stretching ended each session.

The target heart rate for each participant was a specified percentage of their heart rate reserve based on the baseline maximal test. Participants began training at 50%–60% of their heart rate reserve, calculated according to the following formula: initial training heart rate reserve = resting heart rate + 0.5 (maximal heart rate − resting heart rate). Training intensity was increased over a 10-week period as tolerated to 80%–85% of heart rate reserve. This schedule was created according to the guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine. Heart rates were monitored with rate alarms individually set for each participant.

Maximal oxygen consumption was measured using a maximal treadmill exercise test. VO2 max was obtained by standard procedures as described previously (51). The test ended when the participant could no longer continue walking or running. Mean expiratory respiratory exchange ratio on the pretest and post-test indicated good effort. Post-training imaging was performed on all participants 36–48 hours after the last bout of exercise to reduce the effects of acute exercise.

Data Analysis

11C-mHED has been shown to have a high affinity for the reuptake one mechanism that recycles ~70% of the NE released from the sympathetic nerve terminals (52). 11C-mHED metabolites, expressed as the fraction of the whole-blood activity, contribute to the blood PET signal (53). These fractions were curve fit to a rising time-dependent exponential function of the form, f(t) = y 0 + (a*[1 − exp(–b*t)]) using Sigma Plot (SYSTAT Software). Using these derived values, a metabolite-corrected LA cavity time–activity curve was generated by multiplying the LA cavity activity by the function (1 − f[t]).

11C-mHED kinetics were modeled by blood tissue exchange using the MBF value from the 15O-water study to provide the flow parameter in the model (45,49). This model expresses 11C-mHED kinetics in terms of the permeability–surface area product (PSnt, mL/min/mL tissue) for 11C-mHED uptake into the nerve terminal from the interstitial space through the NE transport-1 process and PSves for release of 11C-mHED back into the interstitial space through exocytosis. The neuronal storage of 11C-mHED is expressed as a virtual volume (Vnt, mL/mL tissue) and the rate of vesicular storage of mHED is expressed as G seq (mL/min/mL). Transport rates and volumes are expressed as milliliter of tissue without conversion for any tissue density. In the context of a three-compartment mode, our parameters PSnt, Vnt, and Gseq, and PSves, represent k3, the combined cellular and vesicular reuptake processes. The parameter PSnt most closely represents 11C-mHED uptake into the nerve by NE transport-1 and is the process most likely to be affected by myocardial ischemia or injury. BAR density (B′max) was estimated for each myocardial ROI using the Delforge graphical method (46,54).

Statistics

Hemodynamic measurements, MBF, and SNS measures, B′max and PSnt, were compared between young and old participants as well as male and female cohorts using a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t test. Paired sample t tests were used to compare pretraining and post-training measurements. Analysis of variance was used for repeated measurements. Statistical analyses used SPSS.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Average heart rate (± SD) pretraining in all participants was 68±8.8 and post-training significantly dropped to 64±8.7. Average systolic blood pressure pretraining in all participants was 120±15 and post-training dropped to 117±17.

Average peak VO2SD) pretraining in all participants was 29±8.3 and post-training increased significantly to 34±9.7.

Average weight (± SD) pretraining in all groups was 169±15kg and post-training was 165±15kg. Average baseline body mass index (± SD) in all participants was 25±2.7 and post-training was 25±4.9 (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline and Post-training HR, SBP, Peak VO2, and BMI

All Participants Young Old Female Male
Pre-HR 68±8.8 69±9.4 67±8.6 70±6.3 66±10
Post-HR 64±8.7 63±8.3 64±9.2 66±6.6 61±9.7
p Value <.0001 .002 .005 .01 <.0001
Pre-SBP 120±15 113±12 125±11 117±14 122±11
Post-SBP 117±17 110±14 123±14 113±15 120±14
p Value .45 .74 .49 .72 .49
Prepeak VO2 29±8.3 36±7 24±4.8 25±5.2 33±8.5
Postpeak VO2 34±9.7 42±8 28±5.6 29±6.8 38±10
p Value <.0001 <.0001 .0001 <.0001 <.0001
Pre-BMI 25±2.7 25±2.7 25±2.1 25±2.3 25±3.2
Post-BMI 25±4.9 23±4.5 27±4.5 23±3.8 27±5.1
p Value .86 .0006 .004 .002 .02

Note: BMI = body mass index; HR = heart rate; SBP = systolic blood pressure.

Effects of Age

At baseline, there was a nonsignificant trend for a higher mean β-adrenergic receptor density (β′max density) in the young (15.1±5.5 vs old 13.1±4.3, p = .20; see Tables 2 and 5). NE reuptake (PSnt) declined significantly with age (1.12±0.10 vs 0.87±0.32, p = .036; see Tables 3 and 5). There was no significant difference in mean MBF with age (0.76±0.03 young vs 0.81±0.14 older, p = .24; see Tables 4 and 5).

Table 2.

Global β′max Density* for Participants Before and After Exercise Training

Training Status N Mean β′max* SD
Pretraining 53 13.9 4.9
 Young adults 22 15.1 5.5
 Older adults 31 13.1 4.3
 Men 21 14.3 4.5
 Women 32 13.6 5.2
Post-training 36 13.2 5.3
 Young adults 14 13.1 6.4
 Older adults 22 13.3 4.7
 Men 15 11.7 5.4
 Women 21 14.3 5.0

Note: β′max = β-adrenergic receptor density.

*Postsynaptic function was measured as β′max (in pmol/mL tissue) by imaging the β receptor antagonist [11C]-CGP12177.

Table 5.

Summary by Group Including Mean With Standard Deviations

Young Old p Male Female p Overall
Pretraining PSnt 1.12±1.0 0.87±0.32 .036 0.75±0.57 1.14±0.83 <.001 0.98±0.74
Post-training PSnt 1.09±0.64 0.82±1.8 .127 0.76±0.63 1.04±1.9 .085 0.91±1.5
Pretraining MBF 0.76±0.03 0.81±0.14 .24 0.69±0.12 0.86±0.14 <.0001 0.79±0.14
Post-training MBF 0.75±0.19 0.78±0.19 .63 0.67±0.14 0.85±0.16 <.001 0.77±0.17
Pretraining βʹ max 15.1±5.5 13.1±4.3 .20 14.3±4.5 13.6±5.2 .87 13.9±4.9
Post-training βʹ max 13.1±6.4 13.3±4.7 .90 11.7±5.4 14.3±5.0 .20 13.2±5.3

Note: MBF = myocardial blood flow. At baseline, the only significant differences noted were a lower PSnt with age (p = .036) and a gender difference in MBF and PSnt, where men had significantly lower values than women (p < .0001 and p < .001, respectively). The trend for a lower PSnt with age persisted after training (p = .127) as did gender differences in MBF and PSnt (p < .001 and p = .085, respectively).

Table 3.

PSnt* for Participants Before and After Exercise Training

Training Status N Mean PSnt* SD
Pretraining 56 0.98 0.7
 Young adults 24 1.12 1.0
 Older adults 32 0.87 0.32
 Men 24 0.75 0.57
 Women 31 1.14 0.83
Post-training 40 0.91 1.5
 Young adults 14 1.09 0.64
 Older adults 26 0.82 1.8
 Men 18 0.76 0.63
 Women 22 1.04 1.9

Note: PET = positron emission tomography.

*Presynaptic uptake by the norepinephrine transporter-1 function was measured using PET imaging of [11C]-meta-hydroxyephedrine, a norepinephrine analog, and expressed as a permeability–surface area product (PSnt in mL/min/mL).

Table 4.

MBF* for Participants Before and After Exercise Training

Training Status N Mean MBF* SD
Pretraining 57 0.79 0.14
 Young adults 24 0.76 0.14
 Older adults 33 0.81 0.14
 Men 24 0.69 0.12
 Women 33 0.86 0.14
Post-training 41 0.77 0.17
 Young adults 15 0.75 0.19
 Older adults 26 0.78 0.19
 Men 19 0.67 0.14
 Women 22 0.85 0.16

Note: MBF = myocardial blood flow.

*MBF (in mL/min/mL tissue) was measured by imaging [15O]-water.

Effects of Gender

At baseline, there was no significant difference in β′max density by gender (men 14.3±4.5 vs women 13.6±5.2 where p = .87; see Tables 2 and 5). PSnt was significantly lower among men at baseline (men 0.75±0.57 vs women 1.14±0.83 where p < .001; see Tables 3 and 5). At baseline, MBF was significantly lower among men (men 0.69±0.12 vs women 0.86±0.14 where p < .0001; see Tables 4 and 5).

Training Effects

Overall, exercise training increased VO2 uptake by 13% (p < .0001), reduced resting heart rate by 5% (p < .01), and caused a small decline in body weight (170±25 to 168±25 lbs, p = .03). In the overall group, there was no effect of exercise training on mean β′max density, PSnt, or MBF (see Tables 1 and 5). After training, there remained no significant difference between men and women’s mean β′max density.

The trend for a lower PSnt with age persisted after training (1.09±0.64 vs 0.82±1.8 where p = .127) as did the trend for a higher PSnt in women than men (1.04±1.9 vs 0.76±0.63 where p = .085). The difference in MBF by gender persisted after training (men 0.67±0.14 vs women 0.85±0.16 where p < .001).

Discussion

This study investigated the effects of age, gender, and exercise training on the cardiac SNS.

The main findings of this study are (i) evidence of a decrease in presynaptic function with age whereas postsynaptic function and MBF were unchanged with age and (ii) in women evidence of increased presynaptic function and increased MBF compared with men; both of these gender differences persisted after training. Postsynaptic function was not affected by age or gender. Exercise training did not affect cardiac sympathetic function or MBF.

Age

There was no statistically significant difference in β′max density with age. There are only very limited in vivo data about β′max density in normal participants. One prior study found young mean β′max density to be 11.15±2.2 (55), somewhat lower than our values; there are no prior studies in older healthy adults. Prior studies have shown a greater response to β-adrenergic stimulation in healthy young versus old men (1–6,56–58); our results suggest that differences in beta receptor density do not account for these differences in responsiveness to beta adrenergic stimulation.

No prior studies have examined NE reuptake (PSnt) with age; however, one study showed increased cardiac NE spillover with reduced extraction of 3H NE across the heart with age (59). Our results would be consistent if increased cardiac NE spillover were due to a decrease in reuptake.

Mean MBF did not change with age in our group. In a study done by Czernin and coworkers, a small but significant increase in MBF with age was noted (60). In contrast, Hachamovitch and coworkers reported a reduction in MBF as well as decreased contractile performance (61). Czernin and coworkers assumed homogenous myocardial wall thickness of 1cm; if thickness had been increased by 1mm in their oldest participants, MBF in his study would have been overestimated by 6%.

Gender

There was no significant difference in β′max density by gender at baseline or following training. Both PSnt and MBF were significantly lower among men at baseline. The resting heart rate was 4–5 bpm higher in the women than men before and after training, whereas the systolic pressure was 5–7 mmHg lower in the women than men, so these two determinants of MBF by themselves are unlikely to explain the higher MBF in women. A study in 2007 showed no MBF difference by gender among young participants (62), whereas another study found that older women had a significantly higher MBF than men, similar to our findings (63). Older women account for the difference in MBF by gender (data not shown).

Training

Supervised exercise training led to a significant training effect as shown by the 13% increase in peak VO2 (p < .0001) and reduction in resting heart rate. Taken together, these findings indicated that participants were adequately trained during the study period. Despite the evidence of a significant training effect, we found no difference in β′max density or in mean PSnt as a result of exercise training. There was also no training induced difference in MBF. A prior study by our research group showed no significant change in isoproterenol response following exercise training in men, which would be consistent with no change in receptor number. Other studies demonstrated that exercise reduces level of G protein–coupled receptor kinase-2 that is known to be involved in beta receptor dysregulation (57). The trend for a reduction in PSnt with age persisted after training, as did the PSnt difference by gender.

Overall, training did not affect MBF. This result is consistent with one prior study that examined the effect of training on MBF in older adults (63). A difference in MBF by gender persisted after training.

β′max Density

An in vitro study of donor hearts showed a profound decrease in cardiac β-adrenergic responsiveness with age occurring by multiple mechanisms including downregulation and decreased agonist binding of β1 receptors, uncoupling of β2 receptors, and abnormal G protein–mediated signal transduction (64). Phosphorylation of the β-adrenergic receptor by members of the G protein–coupled receptor kinase family could occur. Alternatively, inhibitory Gi proteins or post-cAMP defects could affect β-adrenergic responsiveness with age or exercise training. This is in contrast with our findings which did now show any changes in postsynaptic function with age suggesting that imaging techniques are not yet capable of capturing these changes. Conversely, although the donor hearts were considered normal, the events preceding death likely led to alterations in the SNS.

PSnt

A significant decline in NE reuptake (PSnt) was observed with age. These results are consistent with another study demonstrating impaired NE reuptake with age (65). Our study showed that the decline persisted after training. PSnt was significantly lower among men; this result persisted after training.

Limitations

Our sample size was small, and our findings could be subject to beta statistical error. As demonstrated in the tables, there were some missing data that had led to varying sample sizes in different groups. In addition, our study examining age differences was cross-sectional. Individual changes may occur across the lifespan, but a longitudinal study was not feasible. Reproducibility of PET measurements of cardiac sympathetic function was not studied in this investigation. Finally, we did not include a group without exercise training due to additional expense. Prior studies have examined the impact of exercise training relative to remaining sedentary on hemodynamic responses including VO2 max, and have found no change in these parameters with continued sedentary lifestyle (66,67).

Finally, all postmenopausal women were receiving hormone replacement therapy at the time of the study. We do not believe this affected the results of our study; however, we do not have a control group that was on no replacement therapy.

Conclusion

The only significant differences noted were a decline in PSnt with age and a gender difference in MBF and PSnt, where men had significantly lower values than women. The trend for a reduction in PSnt with age persisted after training as did gender differences in MBF and PSnt. With these exceptions, little difference in cardiac SNS function was found with age or as a result of endurance training, suggesting that such changes do not occur or that current PET imaging methods may be inadequate to measure small serial differences in a highly reproducible manner.

Funding

This research was supported by grants NIH HL50239 and AG 15462 by VA Research and Development.

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors have any known conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Janet Busey for overall study coordination, data collection, and supervision of the exercise training; Marilou Gronka and Katherine Seymour for data collection and image analysis; Barbara Lewellen and the PET suite personal for image acquisition; Steve Shoner and Minna Zheng for radiochemistry; and Paul Sampson, PhD, for statistical support.

References

  • 1. Stratton JR, Cerqueira MD, Schwartz RS, et al. Differences in cardiovascular responses to isoproterenol in relation to age and exercise training in healthy men. Circulation. 1992;86:504–512. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.86.2.504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Johansson SR, Hjalmarson A. Age and sex differences in cardiovascular reactivity to adrenergic agonists, mental stress and isometric exercise in normal subjects. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1988;48:183–191. doi:10.3109/00365518809085411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chou HT, Yokota Y, Fukuzaki H. Left ventricular reserve of the hypertrophied heart in patients with systemic hypertension and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy—relation to age and left ventricular relative wall thickness. Jpn Circ J. 1990;54:373–382. doi:10.1253/jcj.54.373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fitzgerald D, Doyle V, Kelly JG, O’Malley K. Cardiac sensitivity to isoprenaline, lymphocyte beta-adrenoceptors and age. Clin Sci (Lond). 1984;66:697–699. doi:10.1042/cs0660697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hiremath AN, Pershe RA, Hoffman BB, Blaschke TF. Comparison of age-related changes in prostaglandin e1 and beta-adrenergic responsiveness of vascular smooth muscle in adult males. J Gerontol. 1989;44:M13–M17. doi:10.1093/geronj/44.1.M13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Vestal RE, Wood AJ, Shand DG. Reduced beta-adrenoceptor sensitivity in the elderly. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979;26:181–186. doi:10.1002/cpt1979262181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rich MW. Heart failure in the 21st century: a cardiogeriatric syndrome. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M88–M96. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.2.M88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Conway J, Wheeler R, Sannerstedt R. Sympathetic nervous activity during exercise in relation to age. Cardiovasc Res. 1971;5:577–581. doi:10.1093/cvr/5.4.577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fleg JL, Schulman S, O’Connor F, et al. Effects of acute beta-adrenergic receptor blockade on age-associated changes in cardiovascular performance during dynamic exercise. Circulation. 1994;90:2333–2341. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.90.5.2333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lehmann M, Dickhuth HH, Schmid P, Porzig H, Keul J. Plasma catecholamines, beta-adrenergic receptors, and isoproterenol sensitivity in endurance trained and non-endurance trained volunteers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1984;52:362–369. doi:10.1007/BF00943364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Spina RJ, Ogawa T, Coggan AR, Holloszy JO, Ehsani AA. Exercise training improves left ventricular contractile response to beta-adrenergic agonist. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992;72:307–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hopkins MG, Spina RJ, Ehsani AA. Enhanced beta-adrenergic-mediated cardiovascular responses in endurance athletes. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996;80:516–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sato I, Hasegawa Y, Takahashi N, Hirata Y, Shimomura K, Hotta K. Age-related changes of cardiac control function in man. With special reference to heart rate control at rest and during exercise. J Gerontol. 1981;36:564–572. doi:10.1093/geronj/36.5.564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Caldwell JH, Link JM, Levy WC, Poole JE, Stratton JR. Evidence for pre- to postsynaptic mismatch of the cardiac sympathetic nervous system in ischemic congestive heart failure. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:234–241. doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.044339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Abrass IB, Davis JL, Scarpace PJ. Isoproterenol responsiveness and myocardial beta-adrenergic receptors in young and old rats. J Gerontol. 1982;37:156–160. doi:10.1093/geronj/37.2.156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Abrass IB, Scarpace PJ. Human lymphocyte beta-adrenergic receptors are unaltered with age. J Gerontol. 1981;36:298–301. doi:10.1093/geronj/36.3.298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Brodde OE, Michel MC, Gordon EP, Sandoval A, Gilbert EM, Bristow MR. Beta-adrenoceptor regulation in the human heart: can it be monitored in circulating lymphocytes? Eur Heart J. 1989;10(suppl B):2–10. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/10.suppl_B.2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Heinsimer JA, Lefkowitz RJ. The impact of aging on adrenergic receptor function: clinical and biochemical aspects. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:184–188. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb04890.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Michel MC, Pingsmann A, Beckeringh JJ, Zerkowski HR, Doetsch N, Brodde OE. Selective regulation of beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors in the human heart by chronic beta-adrenoceptor antagonist treatment. Br J Pharmacol. 1988;94:685–692. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. White M, Roden R, Minobe W, et al. Age-related changes in beta-adrenergic neuroeffector systems in the human heart. Circulation. 1994;90:1225–1238. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.90.3.1225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chevalier B, Mansier P, Teiger E, Callen-el Amrani F, Swynghedauw B. Alterations in beta adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in aged rat heart. Effects of chronic administration of propranolol and atropine. Mech Ageing Dev. 1991;60:215–224. doi:10.1016/0047-6374(91)90132-J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Conlon D, Johnston A, O’Malley K, Turner P, Kilfeather S. Effect of ageing and propranolol administration on myocardial beta-adrenoceptor receptor function in mature rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995;289:283–290. doi:10.1016/0922-4106(95)90105-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kusumoto FM, Lurie KG, Dutton J, Capili H, Schwartz JB. Effects of; on av nodal and ventricular beta-adrenergic receptors in the fischer 344 rat. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H1408–H1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Mader SL, Davis PB. Effect of age on acute regulation of beta-adrenergic responses in mononuclear leukocytes. J Gerontol. 1989;44:M168–M173. doi:10.1093/geronj/44.5.M168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Mazzeo RS, Podolin DA, Henry V. Effects of age and endurance training on beta-adrenergic receptor characteristics in Fischer 344 rats. Mech Ageing Dev. 1995;84:157–169. doi:10.1016/0047-6374(95)01643-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Narayanan N, Derby JA. Alterations in the properties of beta-adrenergic receptors of myocardial membranes in aging: impairments in agonist-receptor interactions and guanine nucleotide regulation accompany diminished catecholamine-responsiveness of adenylate cyclase. Mech Ageing Dev. 1982;19:127–139. doi:10.1016/0047-6374(82)90004-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Raitt MH, Tamblyn C, Allen JM, Abrass IB. Beta-adrenergic receptor downregulation and recovery in heart and lung in the fischer 344 rat: effects of aging and correlation with mrna levels. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50:B213–B217. doi:10.1016/0047-6374(82)90004-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Scarpace PJ. Forskolin activation of adenylate cyclase in rat myocardium with age: effects of guanine nucleotide analogs. Mech Ageing Dev. 1990;52:169–178. doi:10.1016/0047-6374(90)90122-V [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Scarpace PJ, Lowenthal DT, Tümer N. Influence of exercise and age on myocardial beta-adrenergic receptor properties. Exp Gerontol. 1992;27:169–177. doi:10.1016/0531-5565(92)90041-W [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Scarpace PJ, Shu Y, Tümer N. Influence of exercise training on myocardial beta-adrenergic signal transduction: differential regulation with age. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994;77:737–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Urasawa K, Murakami T, Yasuda H. Age-related alterations in adenylyl cyclase system of rat hearts. Jpn Circ J. 1991;55:676–684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Werle EO, Strobel G, Weicker H. Decrease in rat cardiac beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors by training and endurance exercise. Life Sci. 1990;46:9–17. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(90)90051-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lehmann M, Schmid P, Porzig H, Keul J. Beta-adrenergic receptors and plasma catecholamine behavior in trained and untrained athletes. Klin Wochenschr. 1983;61:865–871. doi:10.1007/BF01537462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ohman EM, Butler J, Kelly J, Horgan J, O’Malley K. Beta-adrenoceptor adaptation to endurance training. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;10:728–731. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Williams RS, Eden RS, Moll ME, Lester RM, Wallace AG. Autonomic mechanisms of training bradycardia: beta-adrenergic receptors in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1981;51:1232–1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Brodde OE, Zerkowski HR, Schranz D, et al. Age-dependent changes in the beta-adrenoceptor-g-protein(s)-adenylyl cyclase system in human right atrium. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26:20–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Dzimiri N, Moorji A, Kumar N, Halees Z. Effects of different left ventricular load conditions on myocardial beta-adrenoceptor density in patients with rheumatic heart valvular disease. Gen Pharmacol. 1996;27:1019–1023. doi:10.1016/0306-3623(95)02135-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Fleg JL, O’Connor F, Gerstenblith G, et al. Impact of age on the cardiovascular response to dynamic upright exercise in healthy men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78:890–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Mitchell JH, Tate C, Raven P, et al. Acute response and chronic adaptation to exercise in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24:S258–S265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Krohn KA, Link JM, Lewellen TK, Risler R, Eenmaa J, Maier M. The use of 50 mev protons to produce c-11 and o-15. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 1986;23:1190–1192. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Rosenspire KC, Haka MS, Van Dort ME, et al. Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of carbon-11-meta-hydroxyephedrine: a false transmitter agent for heart neuronal imaging. J Nuclear Med. 1990;31:1328–1334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Brady F, Luthra SK, Tochon-Danguy HJ, et al. Asymmetric synthesis of a precursor for the automated radiosynthesis of s-(3′-t-butylamino-2′-hydroxypropoxy)-benzimidazol-2-[11c]one (s-[11c]cgp 12177) as a preferred radioligand for β-adrenergic receptors. Appl Radiat Isot. 1991;42:621–628. doi:10.1016/0883-2889(91)90032-V [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hammadi A, Crouzel C. Asymmetric synthesis of (2s)- and (2r)-4-(3-t-butylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)-benzimidazol-2-[11c]-one (s)-and (r)-[11c]-cgp 12177 from optically active precursors. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 1991;XXIX:681–690. doi:10.1002/jlcr.2580290609 [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Link JM, Krohn KA, Clark JC. Production of 11ch3i by reaction of 11ch3 with i2 in a single pass reaction. Nucl Med Biol. 1997;24:93–97. doi:10.1016/S0969-8051(96)00181-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Caldwell JH, Kroll K, Li Z, Seymour K, Link JM, Krohn KA. Quantitation of presynaptic cardiac sympathetic function with carbon-11-meta-hydroxyephedrine. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1327–1334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Delforge J, Syrota A, Lancon JP, et al. Cardiac beta-adrenergic receptor density measured in vivo using pet, cgp 12177, and a new graphical method. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:739–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Link JM, Synovec RE, Krohn KA, Caldwell JH. High speed liquid chromatography of phenylethanolamines for the kinetic analysis of [11c]-meta-hydroxyephedrine and metabolites in plasma. J Chrom B. 1997;693:31–41. doi:10.1016/S0378-4347(97)00040-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Jones HA, Rhodes CG, Law MP, et al. Rapid analysis for metabolites of [11c]-labelled drugs: fate of [11c]-s-4-(tert-butylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)-benzimidazol-2-one in the dog. J Chromatogr. 1991;570:361–370. doi:10.1016/0378-4347(91)80539-O [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Link JM, Stratton JR, Levy W, et al. Pet measures of pre- and post-synaptic cardiac beta adrenergic function. Nucl Med Biol. 2003;30:795–803. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2003.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bergmann SR, Herrero P, Markham J, Weinheiner CJ, Walsh MN. Noninvasive quantitation of myocardial blood flow in human subjects with oxygen-15-labeled water and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:639–652. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(89)90105-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Stratton JR, Levy WC, Cerqueira MD, Schwartz RS, Abrass IB. Cardiovascular responses to exercise. Effects of aging and exercise training in healthy men. Circulation. 1994;89:1648–1655. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.89.4.1648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Masuda Y, Levy MN. The effects of neuronal uptake blockade on the cardiac responses to sympathetic nerve stimulation and norepinephrine infusion in anesthetized dogs. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1984;10:1–17. doi:10.1016/0165-1838(84)90063-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Calkins H, Allman K, Bolling S, et al. Correlation between scintigraphic evidence of regional sympathetic neuronal dysfunction and ventricular refractoriness in the human heart. Circulation. 1993;88:172–179. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.88.1.172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Delforge J. Correction of a relationship that assesses beta-adrenergic receptor concentration with pet and carbon-11-cgp 12177. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Lefroy DC, de Silva R, Choudhury L, et al. Diffuse reduction of myocardial beta-adrenoceptors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a study with positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1653–1660. doi:10.1016/073C5-1097(93)90591-N [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Ferrara N, Komici K, Corbi G, et al. Beta-adrenergic receptor responsiveness in aging heart and clinical implications. Front Physiol. 2014;4:396. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Leosco D, Parisi V, Femminella GD, et al. Effects of exercise training on cardiovascular adrenergic system. Front Physiol. 2013;4:348. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Ford GA, Hoffman BB, Blaschke TF. Beta adrenergically mediated cardiac chronotropic and vascular smooth muscle responses during propranolol therapy and withdrawal in young and elderly persons. J Gerontol. 1992;47:M22–M26. doi:10.1093/geronj/47.1.M22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Esler MD, Thompson JM, Kaye DM, et al. Effects of aging on the responsiveness of the human cardiac sympathetic nerves to stressors. Circulation. 1995;91:351–358. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.91.2.351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Czernin J, Muller P, Chan S, et al. Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1993;88:62–69. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.88.1.62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Hachamovitch R, Wicker P, Capasso JM, Anversa P. Alterations of coronary blood flow and reserve with aging in Fischer 344 rats. Am J Physiol. 1989;256(1 Pt 2):H66–H73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Peterson LR, Soto PF, Herrero P, Schechtman KB, Dence C, Gropler RJ. Sex differences in myocardial oxygen and glucose metabolism. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:573–581. doi:10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Soto PF, Herrero P, Schechtman KB, et al. Exercise training impacts the myocardial metabolism of older individuals in a gender-specific manner. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;295:H842–H850. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.91426.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Cheitlin MD. Cardiovascular physiology-changes with aging. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2003;12:9–13. doi:10.1111/j.1076-7460.2003.01751.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Esler MD, Turner AG, Kaye DM, et al. Aging effects on human sympathetic neuronal function. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:R278–R285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Blumenthal JA, Emery CF, Madden DJ, et al. Effects of exercise training on cardiorespiratory function in men and women older than 60 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:633–639. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(91)90904-Y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Seals DR, Hagberg JM, Hurley BF, Ehsani AA, Holloszy JO. Endurance training in older men and women. I. Cardiovascular responses to exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1984;57:1024–1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES