Abstract
Streptococcus tigurinus is responsible for severe invasive infections such as infective endocarditis, spondylodiscitis and meningitis. As described, S. tigurinus isolates AZ_3aT and AZ_14 were highly virulent (HV phenotype) in an experimental model of infective endocarditis and showed enhanced adherence and invasion of human endothelial cells when compared to low virulent S. tigurinus isolate AZ_8 (LV phenotype). Here, we sought whether genetic determinants could explain the higher virulence of AZ_3aT and AZ_14 isolates. Several genetic determinants specific to the HV strains were identified through extensive comparative genomics amongst which some were thought to be highly relevant for the observed HV phenotype. These included i) an iron uptake and metabolism operon, ii) an ascorbate assimilation operon, iii) a newly acquired PI-2-like pilus islets described for the first time in S. tigurinus, iv) a hyaluronate metabolism operon, v) an Entner-Doudoroff pathway of carbohydrates metabolism, and vi) an alternate pathways for indole biosynthesis. We believe that the identified genomic features could largely explain the phenotype of high infectivity of the two HV S. tigurinus strains. Indeed, these features include determinants that could be involved at different stages of the disease such as survival of S. tigurinus in blood (iron uptake and ascorbate metabolism operons), initial attachment of bacterial pathogen to the damaged cardiac tissue and/or vegetation that formed on site (PI-2-like pilus islets), tissue invasion (hyaluronate operon and Entner-Doudoroff pathway) and regulation of pathogenicity (indole biosynthesis pathway).
Introduction
Streptococcus tigurinus is a recently identified species belonging to the Streptococcus mitis group. It is a commensal of the human oral cavity [1, 2] and can be responsible of severe invasive infections such as infective endocarditis, spondylodiscitis and meningitis [3–9]. Compared to other viridans streptococci, S. tigurinus might currently be underreported due to limited identification in a clinical routine laboratory [3]. Indeed, conventional phenotypic methods do not provide accurate identification of S. tigurinus because of the morphological resemblance to its closest related species, i.e., S. mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae and Streptococcus infantis. Analysis of the 5’-end of the 16S rRNA gene is mandatory for accurate identification of S. tigurinus since a significant sequence demarcation was demonstrated [1, 4].
S. tigurinus was found to be highly virulent in our rat model of experimental endocarditis [10]. Its capacity to induce infective endocarditis was similar to that of Staphylococcus aureus or enterococci but important variability was observed in the virulence capacity of different S. tigurinus strains [10]. When injected at similar inoculum sizes, the highly virulent (HV) strains AZ_3aT and AZ_14 induced infective endocarditis in ≥80% of the rats, compared to the low virulent (LV) S. tigurinus isolate AZ_8 which produced infective endocarditis in only 56% of the animals [10]. Moreover, these phenotypes correlated with enhanced capabilities of the HV strains to adhere to and invade endothelial cells [10]. A well-studied strain 859 showing similar infectivity rate as S. tigurinus AZ_8 in the experimental infective endocarditis model was previously classified as S. mitis and turned out as S. tigurinus after 16S rRNA gene analysis [10].
In the present study, we performed de novo whole-genome sequencing of four S. tigurinus strains and performed comparative genomics analyses including additional previously sequenced S. tigurinus strains to seek whether genetic differences could potentially explain differences observed in strain’s virulence phenotypes.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strains
S. tigurinus isolates AZ_3aT (CCOS 600T, Culture Collection of Switzerland), AZ_8 (CCOS 678) and AZ_14 (CCOS 689) are clinical strains recovered from blood samples from patients diagnosed with infective endocarditis [3]. S. tigurinus strain 859 was isolated from the nasopharynx of a children from South Africa [11]. In order to analyse a non-invasive S. tigurinus strain by comparative genomics, the S. tigurinus strain ATCC15914 originally isolated from human throat [4], was included. Additional S. tigurinus strains 1366 (parental wild type strain, isolated from the preoperative joint aspirate), 2425 and 2426 (isogenic small-colony variants of strain 1366, isolated from periprosthetic tissue biopsy) were previously sequenced and were originally isolated from a patient with prosthetic joint infection [5, 12]. Bacterial stocks were kept frozen at -80°C in 20% glycerol and grown on Columbia agar plates containing 5% defibrinated sheep blood (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) at 37°C with CO2 for 24 h.
Genome sequencing, assembly and annotation
Genomic DNA from S. tigurinus strains AZ_8, AZ_14, ATCC15914 and 859 were purified using a Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Dübendorf, Switzerland). Genomic DNA libraries from AZ_8, AZ_14, and 859 were prepared using 1μg of the purified genomic DNA and the TruSeq DNA LT Sample Preparation Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina, San Diego, USA; Cat. No. FC-121-2001). The resulting libraries were pooled into a single library for paired-end sequencing of 2x100-bp on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 using TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3 (Cat. No. PE-401-3001) and TruSeq SBS Kit v3 (Cat. No. FC-401-3001). Data were processed using the Illumina Pipeline Software package v1.82 and aligned using Eland v2e. Assembly of paired-end reads was done with Edena [13]. ATCC15914 isolate was sequenced using the PacBio (Pacific Biosciences) technology [14]. Contigs were submitted to NCBI for automated annotation and publication in databases. Assembled contigs of strains AZ_3aT, 1366, 2425, 2426 or full genome of Streptococcus oralis strain Uo5 (closest relative of S. tigurinus) and full annotations were obtained from NCBI (accession numbers: AORU01, AORX01, ASWZ01, ASXA01, 331265438 respectively). Full genome of Streptococcus oralis strain Uo5, which is the closest relative of S. tigurinus, was obtained from NCBI (accession number 331265438).
Availability of data and materials
The genome sequences of the four S. tigurinus strains de novo sequenced in this study have been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database under the following accession numbers: S. tigurinus AZ_8, LNVF00000000; S. tigurinus AZ_14, LNVG00000000; S. tigurinus 859, LNVH00000000; and S. tigurinus ATCC15914, PRJNA302887.
Phylogenetic analysis
Fasta files of Open Reading Frames (ORFs) (both nucleotide and amino-acids sequences) from each genome were downloaded from NCBI and used by two in-house perl scripts (available upon request) to build a phylogenetic tree. Briefly, core proteins, i.e. proteins encoded on the genome of the eight S. tigurinus strains and S. oralis Uo5, were identified by blasting each single protein sequence of a given strain to each single protein sequence of the eight other strains using BlastP with e-value threshold of 10−10. Corresponding nucleotide sequences of genes coding for core proteins present in single copies in all genomes were further used to build a multiple alignment with MAFFT-7.187 [15]. Newick formula was obtained by submitting the MAFFT output file to FastTree-2.1.7 [16]. Finally, the Newick formula was uploaded in Njplot 2.3 (http://doua.prabi.fr/software/njplot) [17] to visualize and root the corresponding phylogenetic tree using S. oralis Uo5 as outgroup. This tree was named Tree_9strains. A similar approach was used to generate a tree for the three strains of interest only, namely AZ_3aT, AZ_14 and AZ_8. In this case, the tree was rooted using AZ_8 as outgroup and was named Tree_3 strains.
Comparative genomics analyses
The core proteome comparison of all strains was performed using the described script “get_homologues.pl” [18]. In this analysis, the core proteome of each strain was identified and then the pairwise average similarity was determined. The genome comparison and the circular representation of this analysis were performed using the described CGView Comparison Tool program [19]. To investigate in details the genetic differences between HV and LV strains, Count software [20] was used with Tree_3strains and the corresponding matrix of absence/presence of genes for each strain generated by the first perl script and supplemented with annotations obtained from NCBI. At first, the Family history by Dollo Parsimony tool was used to identify genes that were acquired and maintained specifically in both HV strains and absent from the LV strain. Using a similar approach with Tree_9strains, the presence of homologs to genes identified in the first analysis was checked in all other strains included in this study. In addition, contig sequences of each strain were submitted to RAST v 2.0 [21]. Topology of LPXTG proteins was predicted using Phobius (http://phobius.sbc.su.se) and Clustal Omega was used to perform alignment of gene products (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo).
Results
Whole-genome sequencing, assembly and annotation
More than 12 millions high quality 100-bp paired-end reads were obtained for each of the four strains that were de novo sequenced in this study and no trimming was therefore needed. Reads assembled into 35, 38, and 14 contigs for strains AZ_8, AZ_14, and 859 respectively (Table 1). PacBio sequencing of strain ATCC15914 resulted in full genome recovery on a single contig. No plasmid sequences were identified in the assembled contigs. The whole genome sequences of S. tigurinus AZ_3aT, 1366, 2425, 2426 and S. oralis Uo5 were retrieved from NCBI database and consisted in 22, 14, 15, 25, and 1 contigs, respectively (Table 1). Genome sizes of all strains ranged from 1.87 Mb to 2.18 Mb. Number of ORFs automatically predicted by RAST server ranged from 1’842 to 2’191 encoding between 1’833 and 2’141 proteins (Table 1). %GC content of all strains ranged from 39.17% to 45.48% and, interestingly, the genomes of the two HV strains harbored the lowest %GC contents (39.17% and 39.9% for AZ_14 and AZ_3aT, respectively).
Table 1. General features of genomes investigated in this study.
Strain | Isolation source | Accession number | Number of contigs | Genome size (Mb) | % GC content | Number of genes | Number of proteins | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sequenced genomes in this study | ||||||||
S. tigurinus | Infection | LNVF00000000 | 35 | 2.13 | 42.20 | 2’134 | 2’079 | |
AZ_8 | (blood) | |||||||
S. tigurinus | Infection | LNVG00000000 | 38 | 1.97 | 39.17 | 2’142 | 1’893 | |
AZ_14 | (blood) | |||||||
S. tigurinus | Carriage | PJRNA302887 | 1 | 1.91 | 41.40 | 1’918 | 1’845 | |
ATCC15914 | (throat) | |||||||
S. tigurinus | Carriage | LNVH00000000 | 14 | 2.04 | 40.46 | 2’066 | 2’010 | |
859 | (nasopharynx) | |||||||
Genome sequences retrieved from NCBI database | ||||||||
S. tigurinus | Infection | AORU01 | 22 | 2.18 | 39.98 | 2’191 | 2’141 | |
AZ_3aT | (blood) | |||||||
S. tigurinus | Infection | AORX01 | 14 | 1.87 | 45.34 | 1’891 | 1’833 | |
1366 | (knee joint fluid) | |||||||
S. tigurinus | Infection | ASWZ01 | 15 | 1.87 | 45.48 | 1’903 | 1’833 | |
2425 | (knee tissue biopsy) | |||||||
S. tigurinus | Infection | ASXA01 | 25 | 1.88 | 41.51 | 1’842 | 1’842 | |
2426 | (knee tissue biopsy) | |||||||
S. oralis | Carriage | 331265438 | 1 | 1.96 | 41.10 | 1’991 | 1’909 | |
Uo5 | (mouth) |
Phylogeny on core genes
The phylogenetic tree obtained from the alignment of 1’331 core genes present in single copies in the core genome of the eight S. tigurinus strains and S. oralis Uo5 is presented in Fig 1. As expected, S. oralis Uo5 (S. tigurinus most closely relative) used as outgroup readily diverged from the S. tigurinus strains. Of note, clustering of strains 2425 and 2426 together with strain 1366 supported accuracy of the phylogenetic tree. Indeed, strains 2425 and 2426 were previously described as two highly similar small-colony variants derived from the parental wild-type strain 1366 [12]. Interestingly, the two HV strains AZ_3aT and AZ_14 clustered together (red branches, Fig 1) far from the LV strain AZ_8 (green branch, Fig 1).
Pairwise comparison of the core proteomes
In addition to the phylogenetic analysis from the multiple alignment of 1’331 single copies core genes (see above), the corresponding core proteomes were compared. As represented in Fig 2, the average % of similarity between the core proteomes of each pair of strains ranged from 94.9% (between S. oralis Uo5 and AZ_3aT or AZ_8) to 98.8% (between the three isogenic strains 1366, 2425 and 2426). Similar to the observation made in the phylogenetic tree (see above), high homology between strains 1366, 2425, 2426 (98.8%; highlighted in orange, Fig 2) supported accuracy of the core proteome comparative analysis. Interestingly, besides this cluster of isogenic strains, the core proteomes of the two HV strains AZ_3aT and AZ_14 exhibited the highest % of identity (96.3%; highlighted in yellow, Fig 2).
Genes specifically acquired in both HV strains
After having identified some general trends specific to the HV strains through phylogenetic analysis using core genes and pairwise comparison of core proteomes we decided to focus on and investigate further genetic determinants acquired and/or maintained in both HV strains but absent from the LV strain. Indeed we thought that such determinants could represent good candidates to explain, at least in part, the observed phenotype of increased infectivity of HV strains in the experimental infective endocarditis model [10]. Comparison of both HV strains with the LV strain using the Family history by Dollo Parsimony tool of Count software revealed 188 genes found in both HV strains that were absent in the LV strain (S1 Table). Amongst the list, several gene clusters harboring significant numbers of annotated gene products (S1 Table, highlighted in light grey)—i.e. having known potential functions, in the opposite of many other gene products annotated as hypothetical proteins—are further described thereafter.
Carbohydrates metabolism
Hyaluronate utilization: A cluster of 13 genes involved in hyaluronate utilization was identified in the two HV strains (AZ3a_ORF_19305 to AZ3a_ORF_19365 and AZ14_ORF_08215 to AZ14_ORF_08155 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively, Table 2 and S1 Fig). This operon was absent from S. oralis Uo5 and all other S. tigurinus strains studied except ATCC15914 (Table 2). Genes coding for enzymes involved in substrate degradation and transformation such as hyaluronate and oligohyaluronate lyases (encoded by hylA and ohl, respectively), unsaturated glucuronyl hydrolase (ugl), a deshydrogenase (kduD), an isomerase (kduI), hyaluronate-oligosaccharide-specific phosphotransferase system components (PTSa-d) and a repressor of the PTS system (regR) were present in this gene cluster. A very similar cluster was found in S. pneumoniae TIGR4 (S1 Fig).
Table 2. Presence and absence of the identified relevant gene clusters in the genomes of all strains investigated in this study.
ORF N° | Gene name | AZ_8 (LV) | AZ_3aT (HV) | AZ_14 (HV) | ATCC 15914 | 1366 | 2425 | 2426 | 859 | Uo5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZ3a_ORF_0110920 | pitA | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_11620 | sipA | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_11625 | pitB | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_11630 | srtG1 | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_11635 | srtG2 | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_13870 | trpAa | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_13865 | trpAb | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_13840 | trpEa | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_13845 | trpEb | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_13860 | trpB | truncated | ||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_13850 | trpC | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_13855 | trpD | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_18870 | pitC | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_18875 | pitD | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_18880 | pitA | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_18890 | reg_SK | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_22340 | reg_RR | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19305 | hylA | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19310 | kdgA | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19315 | kdgK | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19320 | kduI | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19325 | kduD | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19330 | PTSa | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19335 | ugl | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19340 | PTSb | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19345 | PTSc | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19350 | PTSd | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19355 | ||||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19360 | ohl | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_19365 | regR | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_21750 | ulaG | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_21755 | ulaR | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_21760 | sgaESgbE | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_21765 | sgaU | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_21770 | sgaH | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_21775 | ulaA | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_21780 | ulaB | |||||||||
AZ3a_ORF_21785 | ulaC |
Entner-Doudoroff pathway: Both HV strains and ATCC15914 harbored genes kdgA (AZ3a_ORF_19310 and AZ14_ORF_08210 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively) and kdgK (AZ3a_ORF_19315 and AZ14_ORF_08205 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively) encoding an aldolase and a kinase involved in the Entner-Doudoroff pathway, respectively (Table 2 and S1 Fig). Both genes were localized between hylA and kduI within the hyaluronate gene cluster described above. This was also true for S. pneumoniae TIGR4 (S1 Fig).
Iron uptake and metabolism
Three genes (AZ3a_ORF_18880, pitA; AZ3a_ORF_18870, pitC and AZ3a_ORF_18875, pitD) coding for structural components of a ferric iron ABC transporter and two genes reg_RR and reg_SK coding for a response regulator and a sensor kinase of a two-component system associated with the transporter, respectively, were acquired by both HV strains (Table 2 and S2 Fig). A similar operon was found in the three isogenic strains 1366, 2425 and 2426 (Table 2 and S2 Fig). Of note, a very similar operon was also identified in S. mitis strain NCTC12261 and S. pneumoniae TIGR 4 (S2 Fig).
Ascorbate utilization
The two HV strains harbored eight genes of a metabolic pathway transforming ascorbate in D-xylulose-5-phosphate (AZ3a_ORF_21750 to AZ3a_ORF_21785 and AZ14_ORF_08755 to AZ14_ORF_08790 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively, Table 2, S1 Table and S3 Fig). Interestingly, this pathway was not found in the other strains described in this study (Table 2). This gene cluster inserts between a gene coding for sakacin-like protein and a transketolase (S3 Fig). Similar gene clusters were identified in several pathogens such as S. pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus suis, Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus pyogenes (S3 Fig for S. pneumoniae TIGR4). Of note, no further genes were found between both genes in AZ_8 as well as S. mitis NTCC 12261 (S3 Fig).
Adhesion
A region encompassing five ORFs (AZ3a_ORF_0110920 to AZ3a_ORF_11635 and AZ14_ORF_04295 to AZ14_ORF_04315 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively) was found in both HV strains but not in the LV strain (Fig 3).
The first ORF with gene name pitA annotated as adhesin (587 Aa encoded by AZ3a_ORF_0110920 and 844 Aa encoded by AZ14_ORF_04295 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively) was truncated at N-terminal part in AZ_3aT removing a predicted VWA_2 domain, see below. The full length ORF could be retrieved from RAST annotation (862 Aa encoded by AZ3a_RAST_1017) (S4 Fig). AZ3a_RAST_1017 and AZ14_ORF_04295 share 86% identity and 100% coverage. They both harbor a von Willebrand factor type A domain (pfam13519, VWA_2) at the N-terminus and a sortase processing LPXTG-like motif (VPETG) at C-terminus (S4 Fig). Phobius predicted i) a signal peptide at position 1–35 for both proteins, ii) a non-cytoplasmic N-terminus (position 36–834 and 36–812 for AZ3a_RAST_1017 and AZ14_ORF_04295, respectively), iii) a transmembrane domain (position 835–857 and 813–840 for AZ3a_RAST_1017 and AZ14_ORF_04295, respectively) and iv) a cytoplasmic C-terminus (position 858–861 and 841–844 for AZ3a_RAST_1017 and AZ14_ORF_04295, respectively) (S4 Fig). Homologs showing 90%, 83% and 64% and 100% coverage with AZ14_ORF_04295 were present in S. tigurinus strains ATCC15914, S. tigurinus 859 and S. oralis Uo5, respectively (Table 2 and Fig 3). Moreover, homologs showing 87% identity and 76% coverage were annotated as fibronectin-binding proteins in several S. pneumoniae strains (not shown). Of note, despite pitA is a shared gene name for both the present adhesin and AZ3a_ORF_18880 of the gene cluster involved in iron uptake and metabolism (see above), both proteins are indeed distinct with different functions.
The second ORF, annotated as S26 family signal peptidase, was encoded by AZ3a_ORF_11620 and by AZ14_ORF_04300 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively. Both homologs shared 99% identity and 100% coverage. Further homologs harboring 99% identity and 100% coverage were also found in many strains of S. pneumoniae (not shown).
The third ORF, annotated as a phosphate-transport permease PitB, was encoded by AZ3a_ORF_11625 and by AZ14_ORF_04305 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively. Gene product homologs harbored 59% identity over 100% coverage (S5 Fig) and 53% identity over 100% coverage with a PitB protein of S. oralis Uo5 (Fig 3). As for the adhesin (first ORFs described above), Phobius predicted for both PitB-like homologs i) a signal peptide at position 1–40, ii) a non-cytoplasmic N-terminal (position 41–411 and 41–390 for AZ3a_ORF_11620 and AZ14_ORF_04305, respectively), iii) a transmembrane domain (position 412–429 and 391–408 for AZ3a_ORF_11620 and AZ14_ORF_04305, respectively) and iv) a cytoplasmic C-terminus (position 430–435 and 409–414 for AZ3a_ORF_11620 and AZ14_ORF_04305, respectively) (S5 Fig). Moreover both proteins harbored an FcTA conserved protein domain making them new members of the pfam 12892. Interestingly, other members of this family include fibronectin- and collagen-binding proteins.
Fourth ORF encoded by AZ3a_ORF_11630 and AZ14_ORF_04310 was annotated in NCBI as sortase SrtG1 and SrtB family sortase in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively. Both proteins harbored 99% identity and 100% coverage. Fifth ORF encoded by AZ3a_ORF_11635 and AZ14_ORF_04315 was annotated as SrtG1, sortase_B family protein and sortase in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively. Both proteins harbored 95% identity and 100% coverage. Of note, similar gene clusters were identified in S. tigurinus ATCC15914, S. tigurinus 895 and S. oralis Uo5 (Table 2).
Genes specifically lost in the AZ8 LV strain
A total of 12 genes were predicted to be lost by the LV strain AZ_8. Besides isolated genes encoding for different enzymes (a methionine-R- sulfoxide reductase, an haloacid dehalogenase and a NUDIX hydrolase) and one sodium-dependent transporter (data not shown), six genes involved in tryptophan synthesis from chorismate (described below) were lost in AZ_8.
Chorismate to tryptophan pathway—indole production
Count predicted the loss by the LV strain AZ_8 of nearly all the genes—except trpEB and a truncated version of trpB—of a cluster encoding for enzymes involved in tryptophan synthesis from chorismate (Table 2 and S6 Fig). This gene cluster, that is maintained in both HV and other strains studied in this work, encompass AZ3a_ORF_13845 to AZ3a_ORF_13875 and AZ14_ORF_07355 to AZ14_ORF_07385 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively (Table 2). A similar cluster was also identified in Streptococcus gordonii strain Challis substr. CH1 (S6 Fig).
Discussion
S. tigurinus is a recently described streptococcal species responsible for severe invasive infections, including infective endocarditis, spondylodiscitis and meningitis [3–8]. As the identification of S. tigurinus by conventional phenotypic methods is limited, its contribution as a human pathogen is probably underestimated [3, 9]. Our group showed that infectivity was heterogeneous between S. tigurinus strains in an experimental model of infective endocarditis [10]. While some isolates yielded to severe infections (highly virulent, HV phenotype), other isolates were clearly less virulent (low virulent, LV phenotype). HV S. tigurinus strains clustered together and showed higher proteome similarity than LV or other strains. This finding suggests a more close relationship between these two HV strains, as shown from the phylogenetic analysis tree (Figs 1 and 2). This finding supports the hypothesis of some common genetic features between HV strains that are responsible of the exhibited high infectivity phenotype. Focusing on genes acquired by the two most virulent S. tigurinus strains AZ_3aT and AZ_14, our comparative genomics analysis allowed us to identify genetic determinants potentially involved in enhanced infectivity in the model of experimental infective endocarditis in rat [10]. Of note, since our work focused on S. tigurinus intraspecies differences only, we limited the inclusion of S. oralis strains to the strain Uo5 that was identified as the closest strain to S. tigurinus species and served therefore as outgroup. In other words, adding other S. oralis strains to reflect the high heterogeneity of this species [23, 24] would not have modify the list of identified genetic differences between the S. tigurinus HV and LV strains.
Hyaluronate utilization
A major finding was the presence of a complete operon coding for proteins involved in degradation and assimilation of a major constituent of the extracellular matrix throughout the human body, namely hyaluronate. Hyaluronate lyases which are the hyaluronate degrading enzymes [25] have often been considered as virulence factors in various bacterial pathogens [26, 27]. Besides, we identified in all strains a complete Entner-Doudoroff pathway that is involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates [28] and many transporters for host-tissue degradation products to be imported within the bacterial sacculus. Interestingly, Entner-Doudoroff pathway was shown to contribute to pathogenicity in Vibrio cholerae [29] and of highest importance regarding the present study, concomitant up regulation of this pathway with hyaluronate lyases was recently reported in invasive diseases induced by Streptococcus dysgalactiae [30]. It is therefore highly suspected that similar tissue-destroying enzymes and enzymes involved in carbohydrates metabolism and transport acting in concert significantly contribute to the high infectivity of HV S. tigurinus strains.
Chorismate to tryptophan pathway—indole production
Presence of trpAa suggested that HV strains have the capacity to produce anthranilate from chorismate through the two-component enzymatic system TrpAa/TrpAb. In turns, TrpB, TrpC and TrpD—also absent from the LV strain—convert anthranilate into (3-Indoyl)-glycerol phosphate which is a precursor of both indole and tryptophan through two different reactions catalyzed by the same enzymatic complex formed by TrpEa and TrpEb [31]. Therefore, besides the fact that tryptophan might be an non-essential amino acid for HV strains, we believe that the maintained capacity to produce indole independently from the availability of exogenous tryptophan is highly relevant regarding regulation of pathogenicity of HV strains. Indeed, indole—which is mainly produced from L-tryptophan degradation by tryptophanases—is considered as an important intercellular signaling molecule sometime assimilated to a quorum sensing (QS) signal [32]. It has been shown to modulate biofilm production and expression of several virulence and antibiotic resistance genes and plays therefore a crucial role in the pathogenesis of several human bacterial pathogens [33]. Accordingly, such non-essential capacity for a strain of low virulence was lost in AZ_8.
Ascorbate utilization
Our analysis identified an ascorbate metabolism pathway in both HV strains. To the best of our knowledge such pathway has not previously been linked to enhanced bacterial virulence. However, we believe that it could provide S. tigurinus with a relevant alternative carbon source possibly enhancing survival in blood in which ascorbic acid is available as a powerful antioxidant [34]. Indeed, D-Xylulose-5P—the end product of the ascorbate metabolism pathway—is the substrate of Xylulose-5P phosphoketolase to produce D-Glyceraldehyde-3P that in turn enters glycolysis. Regarding potential implication of this pathway in the HV phenotype, it is likely that increased survival in blood would correlate with increased chances for the bacteria to establish endocarditis.
Iron uptake
In the same manner and as described in S. aureus for isd genes [35], we hypothesize that, besides the iron uptake ABC transporter coded by piuABCD present in all strains, the presence of pitACD encoding for an additional ferric ABC transporter allows HV strains to efficiently capture free iron in blood. It is known that concentration of free iron in blood usually accessible for bacteria is below the concentration required for bacterial survival [35]. However, despite the fact that under normal condition most transition metal ions are not free but attached to carrier proteins [36–38], under pathological conditions release of metal ions from their binding protein ferritin can occur [39]. Therefore, similarly to the capacity to metabolize ascorbate, improved capacity to capture free irons could lead to increased survival of HV strains in blood and subsequent capacity to induce infective endocarditis.
Adhesion
We believe that the gene clusters spanning AZ3a_ORF_0110920 to AZ3a_ORF_11635 and AZ14_ORF_04295 to AZ14_ORF_04305 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively correspond to a PI-2-like pilus islets previously described in several streptococcal species among which S. pneumoniae, S. mitis and S. sanguinis [22]. Indeed, the genetic organization of the islets identified in S. tigurinus AZ_3aT, AZ_14, ATCC15914 and 859 is very similar to the previously described PI-2 pilus islets. The gene product encoded by the first ORF harbor a VWA_2 domain at the N-terminus and a sortase processing LPXTG-like motif (VPETG) at C-terminus. This protein could therefore well represent a PitA homolog since PitA has been shown to harbor such domains in several S. pneumoniae strains [40]. Moreover, VWA_2 domains have been identified in Gram-positive pilus proteins having adhesive functions [41–44] and LPXTG proteins are involved in various functions, including host colonization in which they play crucial roles in bacterial adhesion to host tissues, and are often termed adhesins [45]. Therefore it is very likely that AZ3a_RAST_1017 and AZ14_ORF_04295 encode for a PitA homolog with adhesive function. Similarly the third ORF (i.e. AZ3a_ORF_11625 and AZ14_ORF_0305 in AZ_3aT and AZ_14, respectively) encode for proteins harboring a non-canonical LPXTG-like motif (VTPTG). Regarding genomic localization and since VTPTG motifs have been reported in pilus backbone proteins PitB from several other streptococci [22, 44], it is highly likely that both proteins represent PitB homologs. The second ORFs potentially encode for S26 family signal peptidase SipA homologs and accordingly harbor peptidase_26 domains (pfam 10512). Members of this protein family are essential membrane-bound serine proteases that function to cleave the amino-terminal signal peptide extension from proteins that are translocated across biological membranes. SipA has been shown to be required for biosynthesis of pilus in S. pyogenes [46] and very interestingly, expression of a S. suis SipA homolog was found to be highly upregulated when the bacterium interacted with brain microvascular endothelial cells, suggesting a role in the infection process of this pathogen [47]. Finally, as found in other PI-2 pilus islets, two sortases of the B class, SrtG1 and SrtG2, were present on S. tigurinus PI-2 pilus islets. Sortases are classified within families of classes A–F [48]. These enzymes are involved in cell adhesion, iron acquisition, and spore formation [49]. Sortase A recognize LPXTG sorting motifs to anchor surface proteins to the cell wall envelope [50] and sortase B recognize variants of this canonical LPXTG motif such as NPQTN or NPKTG depending on the organism [51, 52]. While the role of the dispensable SrtG2 remains unclear, SrtG1 was found to catalyze the covalent association of PitB monomers [44, 53]. Taken together, these results indicating the presence of PI-2 pilus islets in HV but not in LV strains appears very relevant regarding the phenotype of highly infectivity of the HV strains. Indeed, such PI-2 pili have been shown to mediate adhesion of S. pneumoniae to eukaryotic cells [44] and were proposed as candidates for contributing to adhesive interactions in S. mitis [22]. To the best of our knowledge, this is first report of PI-2-like pilus islets in S. tigurinus.
Conclusions
Using comparative genomics approaches, we were able to identify several genetic features acquired only by the two S. tigurinus HV strains AZ-3aT and AZ_14 but not present in the S. tigurinus LV strain AZ_8. We believe that the identified features could largely explain the phenotype of high virulence previously observed for both HV strains in an experimental model of infective endocarditis in rats. Indeed, these features include determinants that could be involved at different stages of the disease. First of all, determinants involved in iron uptake and ascorbate metabolism could directly promote survival of S. tigurinus in blood. Second, specific adhesins encoded on new PI-2-like islets could mediate initial attachment of bacterial pathogen to the damaged cardiac tissue and/or vegetation that formed on site. Third, newly acquired tissue-destroying enzymes (hyaluronate operon), enzymes involved in carbohydrates metabolism (Entner-Doudoroff pathway) and associated transporters could act in concert to increase tissue invasion. In addition, some of these steps could well be coordinated within the pathogenic population through a specific indole based QS. Obviously, these hypotheses need experimental validations, but our list of genes potentially responsible for the increased infectivity of HV strains represents relevant genetic determinants to explore further. For instance, deletion mutants could be evaluated in our model of infective endocarditis. Moreover, if correlation between our findings and experimental results is demonstrated, new PCR assays targeting HV specific genes aiming at predicting the infectivity potential of any S. tigurinus isolate could well be developed.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We address our deep thank to Marco Pagni for his precious assistance with the perl scripts and Nicolas Salamin for very fruitful discussions and assistance with the phylogenetic analyses.
Data Availability
The genome sequences of the four S. tigurinus strains de novo sequenced in this study have been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database under the following accession numbers: S. tigurinus AZ_8, LNVF00000000; S. tigurinus AZ_14, LNVG00000000; S. tigurinus 859, LNVH00000000; and S. tigurinus ATCC15914, PRJNA302887.
Funding Statement
The cost of this work was supported in part by the project 31003A_153474 from the Swiss National Foundation (to PF). There was no additional external funding received for this study.
References
- 1.Zbinden A, Aras F, Zbinden R, Mouttet F, Schmidlin PR, Bloemberg GV, et al. Frequent detection of Streptococcus tigurinus in the human oral microbial flora by a specific 16S rRNA gene real-time TaqMan PCR. BMC microbiology. 2014;14:231 10.1186/s12866-014-0231-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dhotre SV, Mehetre GT, Dharne MS, Suryawanshi NM, Nagoba BS. Isolation of Streptococcus tigurinus—a novel member of Streptococcus mitis group from a case of periodontitis. FEMS microbiology letters. 2014;357(2):131–5. 10.1111/1574-6968.12519 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zbinden A, Mueller NJ, Tarr PE, Eich G, Schulthess B, Bahlmann AS, et al. Streptococcus tigurinus, a novel member of the Streptococcus mitis group, causes invasive infections. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2012;50(9):2969–73. 10.1128/JCM.00849-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zbinden A, Mueller NJ, Tarr PE, Sproer C, Keller PM, Bloemberg GV. Streptococcus tigurinus sp. nov., isolated from blood of patients with endocarditis, meningitis and spondylodiscitis. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology. 2012;62(Pt 12):2941–5. 10.1099/ijs.0.038299-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zbinden A, Quiblier C, Hernandez D, Herzog K, Bodler P, Senn MM, et al. Characterization of Streptococcus tigurinus small-colony variants causing prosthetic joint infection by comparative whole-genome analyses. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2014;52(2):467–74. 10.1128/JCM.02801-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kanamori H, Kakuta R, Yano H, Suzuki T, Gu Y, Oe C, et al. A case of culture-negative endocarditis due to Streptococcus tigurinus. Journal of infection and chemotherapy: official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy. 2015;21(2):138–40. 10.1016/j.jiac.2014.08.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Isaksson J, Rasmussen M, Nilson B, Stadler LS, Kurland S, Olaison L, et al. Comparison of species identification of endocarditis associated viridans streptococci using rnpB genotyping and 2 MALDI-TOF systems. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2015;81(4):240–5. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.12.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Michelena A, Bonavila C, Zubeltzu B, Goenaga MA. [Endocarditis due to Streptococcus tigurinus: presentation of a case and a review of the literature]. Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica. 2015;33(8):575–6. 10.1016/j.eimc.2015.01.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bourassa L, Clarridge JE 3rd. Clinical Significance and Characterization of Streptococcus tigurinus Isolates in an Adult Population. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2015;53(11):3574–9. 10.1128/JCM.01551-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Veloso TR, Zbinden A, Andreoni F, Giddey M, Vouillamoz J, Moreillon P, et al. Streptococcus tigurinus is highly virulent in a rat model of experimental endocarditis. International journal of medical microbiology: IJMM. 2013;303(8):498–504. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.06.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Farber BF, Eliopoulos GM, Ward JI, Ruoff K, Moellering RC Jr. Resistance to penicillin-streptomycin synergy among clinical isolates of viridans streptococci. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1983;24(6):871–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gizard Y, Zbinden A, Schrenzel J, Francois P. Whole-Genome Sequences of Streptococcus tigurinus Type Strain AZ_3a and S. tigurinus 1366, a Strain Causing Prosthetic Joint Infection. Genome announcements. 2013;1(2). 10.1128/genomeA.00210-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hernandez D, Francois P, Farinelli L, Osteras M, Schrenzel J. De novo bacterial genome sequencing: millions of very short reads assembled on a desktop computer. Genome research. 2008;18(5):802–9. 10.1101/gr.072033.107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gupta PK. Single-molecule DNA sequencing technologies for future genomics research. Trends in biotechnology. 2008;26(11):602–11. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.07.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular biology and evolution. 2013;30(4):772–80. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PloS one. 2010;5(3):e9490 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Perriere G, Gouy M. WWW-query: an on-line retrieval system for biological sequence banks. Biochimie. 1996;78(5):364–9. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Contreras-Moreira B, Vinuesa P. GET_HOMOLOGUES, a versatile software package for scalable and robust microbial pangenome analysis. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2013;79(24):7696–701. 10.1128/AEM.02411-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Grant JR, Arantes AS, Stothard P. Comparing thousands of circular genomes using the CGView Comparison Tool. BMC genomics. 2012;13:202 10.1186/1471-2164-13-202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Csuros M. Count: evolutionary analysis of phylogenetic profiles with parsimony and likelihood. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(15):1910–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq315 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC genomics. 2008;9:75 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zahner D, Gandhi AR, Yi H, Stephens DS. Mitis group streptococci express variable pilus islet 2 pili. PloS one. 2011;6(9):e25124 10.1371/journal.pone.0025124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kilian M, Poulsen K, Blomqvist T, Havarstein LS, Bek-Thomsen M, Tettelin H, et al. Evolution of Streptococcus pneumoniae and its close commensal relatives. PloS one. 2008;3(7):e2683 10.1371/journal.pone.0002683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Denapaite D, Rieger M, Kondgen S, Bruckner R, Ochigava I, Kappeler P, et al. Highly Variable Streptococcus oralis Strains Are Common among Viridans Streptococci Isolated from Primates. mSphere. 2016;1(2). 10.1128/mSphere.00041-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Linhardt RJ, Galliher PM, Cooney CL. Polysaccharide lyases. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology. 1986;12(2):135–76. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ibberson CB, Jones CL, Singh S, Wise MC, Hart ME, Zurawski DV, et al. Staphylococcus aureus hyaluronidase is a CodY-regulated virulence factor. Infection and immunity. 2014;82(10):4253–64. 10.1128/IAI.01710-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Makris G, Wright JD, Ingham E, Holland KT. The hyaluronate lyase of Staphylococcus aureus—a virulence factor? Microbiology. 2004;150(Pt 6):2005–13. 10.1099/mic.0.26942-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Conway T. The Entner-Doudoroff pathway: history, physiology and molecular biology. FEMS microbiology reviews. 1992;9(1):1–27. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Patra T, Koley H, Ramamurthy T, Ghose AC, Nandy RK. The Entner-Doudoroff pathway is obligatory for gluconate utilization and contributes to the pathogenicity of Vibrio cholerae. Journal of bacteriology. 2012;194(13):3377–85. 10.1128/JB.06379-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Watanabe S, Shimomura Y, Ubukata K, Kirikae T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T. Concomitant regulation of host tissue-destroying virulence factors and carbohydrate metabolism during invasive diseases induced by group g streptococci. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2013;208(9):1482–93. 10.1093/infdis/jit353 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pittard J, Yang J. Biosynthesis of the Aromatic Amino Acids. EcoSal Plus. 2008;3(1). 10.1128/ecosalplus.3.6.1.8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lee HH, Molla MN, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Bacterial charity work leads to population-wide resistance. Nature. 2010;467(7311):82–5. 10.1038/nature09354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee JH, Wood TK, Lee J. Roles of Indole as an Interspecies and Interkingdom Signaling Molecule. Trends in microbiology. 2015;23(11):707–18. 10.1016/j.tim.2015.08.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Frei B, England L, Ames BN. Ascorbate is an outstanding antioxidant in human blood plasma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1989;86(16):6377–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Malachowa N, DeLeo FR. Staphylococcus aureus survival in human blood. Virulence. 2011;2(6):567–9. 10.4161/viru.2.6.17732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. Clarenton, Oxford: 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM. Iron as biological pro-oxidant. Atl Sci Biochem 1988;1:48–52. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gutteridge JM, Richmond R, Halliwell B. Oxygen free-radicals and lipid peroxidation: inhibition by the protein caeruloplasmin. FEBS lett. 1980;112(2):265–68.7371864 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Koorts AM, Viljoen M. Acute Phase Proteins: Ferritin and Ferritin Isoforms In: Veas PF, editor. Acute Phase Proteins—Regulation and Functions of Acute Phase Proteins 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Colombatti A, Bonaldo P. The superfamily of proteins with von Willebrand factor type A-like domains: one theme common to components of extracellular matrix, hemostasis, cellular adhesion, and defense mechanisms. Blood. 1991;77(11):2305–15. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kankainen M, Paulin L, Tynkkynen S, von Ossowski I, Reunanen J, Partanen P, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reveals pili containing a human- mucus binding protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(40):17193–8. 10.1073/pnas.0908876106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Konto-Ghiorghi Y, Mairey E, Mallet A, Dumenil G, Caliot E, Trieu-Cuot P, et al. Dual role for pilus in adherence to epithelial cells and biofilm formation in Streptococcus agalactiae. PLoS pathogens. 2009;5(5):e1000422 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Izore T, Contreras-Martel C, El Mortaji L, Manzano C, Terrasse R, Vernet T, et al. Structural basis of host cell recognition by the pilus adhesin from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Structure. 2010;18(1):106–15. 10.1016/j.str.2009.10.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bagnoli F, Moschioni M, Donati C, Dimitrovska V, Ferlenghi I, Facciotti C, et al. A second pilus type in Streptococcus pneumoniae is prevalent in emerging serotypes and mediates adhesion to host cells. Journal of bacteriology. 2008;190(15):5480–92. 10.1128/JB.00384-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Roche FM, Massey R, Peacock SJ, Day NP, Visai L, Speziale P, et al. Characterization of novel LPXTG-containing proteins of Staphylococcus aureus identified from genome sequences. Microbiology. 2003;149(Pt 3):643–54. 10.1099/mic.0.25996-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zahner D, Scott JR. SipA is required for pilus formation in Streptococcus pyogenes serotype M3. Journal of bacteriology. 2008;190(2):527–35. 10.1128/JB.01520-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fittipaldi N, Gottschalk M, Vanier G, Daigle F, Harel J. Use of selective capture of transcribed sequences to identify genes preferentially expressed by Streptococcus suis upon interaction with porcine brain microvascular endothelial cells. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2007;73(13):4359–64. 10.1128/AEM.00258-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Spirig T, Weiner EM, Clubb RT. Sortase enzymes in Gram-positive bacteria. Molecular microbiology. 2011;82(5):1044–59. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07887.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Maresso AW, Schneewind O. Sortase as a target of anti-infective therapy. Pharmacological reviews. 2008;60(1):128–41. 10.1124/pr.107.07110 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ton-That H, Marraffini LA, Schneewind O. Protein sorting to the cell wall envelope of Gram-positive bacteria. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2004;1694(1–3):269–78. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.04.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mazmanian SK, Ton-That H, Su K, Schneewind O. An iron-regulated sortase anchors a class of surface protein during Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99(4):2293–8. 10.1073/pnas.032523999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Maresso AW, Chapa TJ, Schneewind O. Surface protein IsdC and Sortase B are required for heme-iron scavenging of Bacillus anthracis. Journal of bacteriology. 2006;188(23):8145–52. 10.1128/JB.01011-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shaik MM, Lombardi C, Maragno Trindade D, Fenel D, Schoehn G, Di Guilmi AM, et al. A structural snapshot of type II pilus formation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2015;290(37):22581–92. 10.1074/jbc.M115.647834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequences of the four S. tigurinus strains de novo sequenced in this study have been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database under the following accession numbers: S. tigurinus AZ_8, LNVF00000000; S. tigurinus AZ_14, LNVG00000000; S. tigurinus 859, LNVH00000000; and S. tigurinus ATCC15914, PRJNA302887.
The genome sequences of the four S. tigurinus strains de novo sequenced in this study have been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database under the following accession numbers: S. tigurinus AZ_8, LNVF00000000; S. tigurinus AZ_14, LNVG00000000; S. tigurinus 859, LNVH00000000; and S. tigurinus ATCC15914, PRJNA302887.