Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1982 Sep;35(9):986–998. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.9.986

The test request form: a neglected route for communication between the physician and the clinical chemist?

A R Henderson
PMCID: PMC497850  PMID: 7119131

Abstract

The requirements for a clinical biochemistry test request form are reviewed. The interaction between the configuration of the main analysers and the number of individual tests, or profiles, that are ordered using different request form formats were monitored for three-month periods over a three-year period while the main analysers were being "reconfigured" or replaced. Although there was a significant increase in orders for individual tests (compared to profile requests) required on outpatients this did not occur with the inpatient ordering pattern. Instead, the numbers of discretionary tests dropped and more miniprofiles--for example, the electrolyte group, were ordered, although the total number of profiles (per patient day) did not increase because the "electrolyte-urea-creatinine" profile numbers markedly decreased during rhe period of the study. This shift in ordering patterns was assumed to be due to the faster turnaround of "priority" (emergency) test requests which could, due to improved instrumentation, be analysed as quickly as individual test requests. Glucose was dropped from the major profile and the numbers of discretionary glucose requests did not increase. It was concluded that, providing this single test can be performed efficiently, there is no need for glucose to be included in test profiles.

Full text

PDF
986

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Henderson A. R., Gardner M. D. Clinical chemistry laboratory productivity: a comparison between a Canadian and a British teaching hospital. J Clin Pathol. 1981 Jan;34(1):44–48. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.1.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Henderson A. R., Gardner M. D., Griffiths P. D., Owen J. A., Porter C. J., Tonks D. B. Clinical chemistry usage in Britain and Canada. N Engl J Med. 1980 Jul 10;303(2):113–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Henderson A. R. Use, and abuse, of the telephone in clinical laboratories: a simple solution. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Sep;30(9):890–893. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.9.890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Svirbely J. R., Speicher C. E. The importance of request and report forms in the interpretation of therapeutic drug monitoring data. Ther Drug Monit. 1980;2(3):211–216. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198007000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Walters M. I., Speicher C. E. Organization of a laboratory service for therapeutic drug monitoring. Clin Lab Med. 1981 Sep;1(3):439–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES