Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2016 Aug 10;7:1206. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01206

Root ABA Accumulation Enhances Rice Seedling Drought Tolerance under Ammonium Supply: Interaction with Aquaporins

Lei Ding 1,2,†, Yingrui Li 1,†, Ying Wang 1, Limin Gao 1, Min Wang 1, François Chaumont 2, Qirong Shen 1, Shiwei Guo 1,*
PMCID: PMC4979525  PMID: 27559341

Abstract

In previous studies, we demonstrated that ammonium nutrition enhances the drought tolerance of rice seedlings compared to nitrate nutrition and contributes to a higher root water uptake ability. It remains unclear why rice seedlings maintain a higher water uptake ability when supplied with ammonium under drought stress. Here, we focused on the effects of nitrogen form and drought stress on root abscisic acid (ABA) concentration and aquaporin expression using hydroponics experiments and stimulating drought stress with 10% PEG6000. Drought stress decreased the leaf photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductivity and increased the leaf temperature of plants supplied with either ammonium or nitrate, but especially under nitrate supply. After 4 h of PEG treatment, the root protoplast water permeability and the expression of root PIP and TIP genes decreased in plants supplied with ammonium or nitrate. After 24 h of PEG treatment, the root hydraulic conductivity, the protoplast water permeability, and the expression of some aquaporin genes increased in plants supplied with ammonium compared to those under non-PEG treatment. Root ABA accumulation was induced by 24 h of PEG treatment, especially in plants supplied with ammonium. The addition of exogenous ABA decreased the expression of PIP and TIP genes under non-PEG treatment but increased the expression of some of them under PEG treatment. We concluded that drought stress induced a down-regulation of aquaporin expression, which appeared earlier than did root ABA accumulation. With continued drought stress, aquaporin expression and activity increased due to root ABA accumulation in plants supplied with ammonium.

Keywords: rice, water uptake, ABA, aquaporin, drought stress

Introduction

Previous studies demonstrated that ammonium nitrogen (NH4+) enhances rice seedling drought tolerance due to a higher root water uptake ability (Gao et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2012) compared to that of seedlings under nitrate nitrogen (NO3-) supply. Under drought stress, Yang et al. (2012) reported decreased root hydraulic conductivity in rice plants supplied with nitrate, illustrated by the down-regulation of aquaporin activity and the increased formation of root cortical aerenchyma. It was found that short-term simulated drought stress could increase root AQP expression, activity and root hydraulic conductivity under NH4+ supply but not under nitrate supply (Ding et al., 2015).

Abscisic acid (ABA) potentially plays important roles in AQP regulation and root water uptake in plants facing different nitrogen forms and/or drought stress (Schraut et al., 2005; Parent et al., 2009). In most studies, application of exogenous ABA increased the root PIP gene expression under normal water conditions (Jang et al., 2004; Zhu et al., 2005; Lian et al., 2006). Under drought stress, root ABA accumulation was indispensable for regulating AQP expression (Kaldenhoff et al., 2008; Parent et al., 2009) and for enhancing plant growth (Sharp, 2002; Zhang et al., 2006). Actually, in these conditions, roots-perceived water deficit and accumulated ABA, which would be transported to the leaves to regulate stomatal closure (Zhang and Davies, 1990; Davies and Zhang, 1991; Sengupta et al., 2011). A positive correlation has been observed between drought stress and root ABA accumulation in beans (Puertolas et al., 2013), potato (Puertolas et al., 2015), maize (Zhang and Davies, 1989), rice and Arabidopsis (Xu et al., 2013). Using ‘one shoot-two roots’ potato under partial root-zone drying (PRD), Puertolas et al. (2015) also showed that ABA only accumulated in dry-side roots, which further illustrated this positive correlation. In addition, plant aerial parts accumulated ABA under drought stress in tomato (Perez-Perez and Dodd, 2015), wheat (Guóth et al., 2009), and hops (Korovetska et al., 2014).

However, it remains unclear how nitrogen form affects ABA dynamics, such as how changes in ABA amount regulate root AQP expression and water uptake in plants under drought stress. It was reported that root and aerial tissues accumulated more ABA when NH4+ is supplied as a sole nitrogen source in castor bean (Peuke et al., 1994), pea (Zdunek and Lips, 2001), and tomato (Rahayu et al., 2005). We hypothesized that rice roots could accumulate more ABA and further stimulate AQP expression under drought stress with NH4+ supply. In the present study, we aimed to determine (1) how nitrogen form and drought stress affect ABA dynamics and (2) the potential correlation between ABA change and AQP regulation in roots under drought stress.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Rice seeds (Oryza sativa L., cv. ‘Shanyou 63’ hybrid indica China) were disinfected in 10% H2O2 (W/W) for 30 min and then germinated in a plastic basket (25 cm × 18 cm) with mesh. After the seedlings had developed an average of 2.5 visible leaves, they were transplanted to a 7-L plastic box containing a quarter-strength mixture of NH4+ and NO3- (ANN) nutrient solution (Ding et al., 2015). After 3 days, the rice seedlings were transferred to half-strength ANN for 5 days and then supplied with full-strength ANN for 1 week, after which the seedlings were supplied with either NH4+ (AN) or NO3- (NN) nutrient solution. After an additional week, the seedlings were subjected to simulated drought stress by the addition of 10% PEG (10% w/v, MW 6000) to the nutrient solutions (-0.15 MPa). Four treatments were applied: AN, NN, NH4+ plus 10% PEG 6000 (ANP) and NO3- plus 10% PEG 6000 (NNP). For exogenous ABA treatment, 5 μM ABA in nutrient solution was added.

Cucumber plants were cultured identically to rice plants with the same nutrient solution in 1-L plastic cup. For simulating drought stress, 2% (w/v) PEG6000 was added into the nutrient solution.

The temperature in the glasshouse was maintained at 30°C during the day and 18°C at night. Light was supplied by SON-T AGRO 400 W bulbs; the light intensity was maintained at a minimum of 1000 μmol photons m-2 s-1 (photosynthetically active radiation) at the leaf level using a 14-h photoperiod.

Gas-Exchange Measurement and Thermo Imaging

After 24 h of treatment with PEG, the light-saturated photosynthesis of newly expanded leaves was measured from 09:00 to 11:00 using the Li-Cor 6400 portable photosynthesis system. The leaf temperature during measurement was maintained at 28°C, and the photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was 1500 μmol m-2 s-1.

Meanwhile, infrared images were obtained using an infrared camera (SC620, FLIR Systems, Inc., USA) with a spectral sensitivity ranging from 7.5 to 13 mm and a spatial resolution of 0.65 mrad.

Root Hydraulic Conductivity Measurement and Root Protoplast Swelling Analysis

After 24 h of treatment with PEG, root hydraulic conductance was measured using a high-pressure flow meter (HPFM; Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA) according to Ding et al. (2015). Root protoplasts were isolated after 4 and 24 h of PEG treatment, and a swelling assay was conducted to analyze the water permeability coefficient Pos according to a previous method (Ding et al., 2015).

RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real Time PCR (RT-qPCR)

Root samples were harvested after 4 and 24 h of PEG and ABA treatments, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at -70°C until RNA isolation. The total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScriptTM RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Dalian, China). Reverse transcription quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using the ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR system, and the products were labeled using the SYBR Green master mix (SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II (Tli RNaseH Plus); TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The primers for RT-qPCR were according to Sakurai-Ishikawa et al. (2011), and the 18 sRNA was used as a housekeeping gene. Genes identifiers were listed in Supplementary Table S1. The relative gene expression was calculated with the 2-ΔCt method.

ABA Detection in Roots, Leaves, and Xylem Sap

Root samples were harvested after PEG treatment for 2, 4, 12 and 24 h, followed by storage at -70°C. Leaf samples were harvested after 24 h of PEG treatment. Both the roots and leaves were freeze dried and extracted in glass-distilled water using approximately 1.2 ml per 40 mg dry weight, boiled for 1–2 min, and shaken at 4°C overnight. The extracts were centrifuged, and the supernatants were assayed with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Plant hormone ABA; ELISA Kit, CUSABIO, USA).

To detect xylem sap ABA, xylem sap was collected after 24 h of PEG treatment. The plants were de-topped approximately 2 cm above the interface of the roots and shoots, and the exudation was immediately cleaned with filter paper to avoid contamination. Absorbent cotton was placed on the top of each piece of de-topped xylem and covered with plastic film to avoid evaporation. Xylem sap was collected from the cotton with a syringe and then frozen at -20°C for the ABA assay. Frozen xylem sap was allowed to thaw for approximately 45 min before being assayed.

Statistics

A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences in each parameter among the treatments using the JMP 9 statistical software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). For gene expression analysis, R software package1 was used to generate a hierarchical cluster heat map and cluster tree. The significant differences (P < 0.05) among the treatments as determined by Student’s t-test are indicated with different letters.

Results

Effect of Nitrogen Form and Drought Stress on Leaf Gas Exchange and Temperature

Under non-PEG treatment, no significant differences in the photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductivity (gs), or transpiration (Tr) were observed between NH4+- and NO3--supplied plants (Figure 1). After 24 h of PEG treatment, gs and Tr significantly decreased in plants supplied with either nitrogen form, and Pn decreased in NO3--supplied plants. In plants supplied with NO3-, the gs decreased from 0.32 to 0.17 mol m-2 s-1 and the Pn decreased by approximately 30% by PEG treatment from 22.9 to 16.1 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1 (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Effects of different nitrogen forms and drought stress on newly expanded leaf photosynthetic rate (A), stomatal conductivity (B), and transpiration (C). The data represent the means of five replicates. The error bars indicate the ±SD. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments are indicated by different letters. Rice seedlings were supplied with ammonium or nitrate under control and drought stress simulation by adding 10% PEG6000 (NH4+ + PEG as ANP; NO3- + PEG as NNP). After 24 h of treatment with PEG, newly expanded leave were measured.

To investigate how drought stress affected leaf temperature, an infrared camera was used. A thermograph was used to determine the temperature difference. Leaves showed the highest temperature when supplied with NO3- under PEG treatment (Figures 2A,B). There was a significant negative correlation between stomatal conductivity and leaf temperature (Figure 2C).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Effects of different nitrogen forms and drought stress on leaf thermo image (A), leaf temperature (B) and the correlation between stomatal conductivity and leaf temperature (C). A thermograph was taken before measuring the leaf photosynthetic rate. To calculate leaf temperature, 11 leaves were taken from the thermo image. The error bars indicate the ±SD. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments are indicated by different letters. Rice seedlings were supplied with ammonium or nitrate under control and drought stress stimulation by adding 10% PEG6000 (NH4+ + PEG as ANP; NO3- + PEG as NNP).

Effect of Nitrogen Form and Drought Stress on Root Water Uptake Ability

After 24 h of PEG treatment, the root hydraulic conductivity increased significantly in plants supplied with NH4+. Compared to non-PEG treatment, drought stress enhanced the root hydraulic conductivity approximately twofold when the plants were fed NH4+ (Figure 3A). Similar results were not observed in plants supplied with NO3-.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Effects of different nitrogen forms and drought stress on root hydraulic conductivity (A) and the root protoplast water permeability coefficient Pos(B,C). Root hydraulic conductivity was measured after 24 h of PEG treatment. Root protoplasts were isolated after 4 h (B) and 24 h (C) of PEG treatment. The data represent the means of four replicates. The error bars indicate the ±SD. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments are indicated by different letters. Rice seedlings were supplied with ammonium or nitrate under control and drought stress stimulation by adding 10% PEG6000 (NH4+ + PEG as ANP; NO3- + PEG as NNP).

To further investigate the effect of nitrogen form and drought stress on root cell water permeability, a root protoplast swelling assay was performed. After 4 h of PEG treatment, the water permeability Pos of protoplasts obtained from roots supplied with either nitrogen form decreased (Figure 3B). However, the Pos increased when the plants grew in presence of NH4+ supply after 24 h of PEG treatment compared with the Pos of cells coming from non-PEG treated plants; no change in Pos was observed when the plants were supplied with NO3- (Figure 3C).

Effect of Nitrogen Form and Drought Stress on Root PIP and TIP Gene Expression

To investigate how the expression of the aquaporin genes was affected in roots by drought stress, we measured the mRNA level of nine PIPs genes (PIP1;1 to PIP1;3, PIP2;1 to PIP2;6), including PIP1;1 to 1;3 and PIP2;1 to 2;6, and four TIPs genes (TIP1;1, TIP1;2, TIP2;1, and TIP2;2) by the RT-qPCR. Under non-PEG treatment, the expression of almost all the PIP and TIP genes was higher in plants supplied with NH4+ than that in those supplied with NO3- (Figure 4). After 4 h of PEG treatment, the expression of all genes dramatically decreased in plants supplied with either nitrogen forms compared to that of non-PEG treatment, especially that of PIP2;5, PIP2;6, and TIP1;2. In contrast, after 24 h of PEG treatment, the expression of these genes showed different levels of increase compared to those under 4 h PEG treatment, especially in plants supplied with NH4+. Compared to non-PEG treatment, PIP2;5 expression was higher under NH4+ supply after 24 h of PEG treatment (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

Effects of different nitrogen forms and drought stress on root PIP and TIP gene expression. Root PIP and TIP expression was detected after 4 h (A) and 24 h (B) of PEG treatment. The data were from RT-qPCR and were analyzed with 2-ΔCt and further normalized with the log10 method. Red represents higher in transcript levels than blue colors as indicated in figure. The treatment tree and gene tree were generated based on the expression pattern. The data represent the means of three replicates. Rice seedlings were supplied with ammonium or nitrate under control and drought stress simulated by adding 10% PEG6000 (NH4+ + PEG as ANP; NO3- + PEG as NNP).

Effect of Nitrogen Form and Drought Stress on Root Endogenous Abscisic Acid (ABA), Xylem Sap ABA, and Leaf ABA

To investigate the potential relationship between aquaporin and ABA under drought stress, ABA concentration was measured after 2, 4, 12, and 24 h of PEG treatment. Under non-PEG treatment, the root ABA concentration was higher in plants supplied with NH4+ compared with the plants supplied with NO3- (Figure 5). The ABA concentration was significantly higher in plants supplied with NH4+ after 12 h of PEG treatment than in plants under non-PEG treatment. In particular, after 24 h of treatment, the ABA concentration increased 10-fold from 0.13 to 1.2 μg g-1. In plants supplied with NO3-, PEG treatment increased the ABA concentration from 0.09 to 0.33 μg g-1. After 24 h of PEG treatment, the root ABA concentration was fourfold higher under NH4+ supply than that under NO3- supply.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

Effects of different nitrogen forms and drought stress on the root ABA concentration. Root ABA dynamics were detected after 2, 4, 12, and 24 h of PEG treatment. The data represent the means of three replicates. The error bars indicate the ±SD. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments are indicated by different letters. Rice seedlings were supplied with ammonium (AN) or nitrate (NN) under control and drought stress simulation by adding 10% PEG6000 (NH4+ + PEG as ANP; NO3- + PEG as NNP).

In the aerial parts under non-PEG treatment, both xylem sap and leaf ABA concentrations were higher when supplied with NO3-, but not significantly different than supplied with NH4+ (Figure 6A). However, 24 h of PEG treatment significantly increased the xylem sap ABA concentration, which was threefold higher than that in non-PEG-treated plant supplied with NH4+. There was no increase in the xylem ABA concentration by PEG treatment in plants supplied with NO3-, which was significantly lower than that in plants supplied with NH4+ (Figure 6A). Compared to the xylem sap ABA change, the ABA concentration in the leaves showed the same tendency, increasing by PEG treatment from 2.24 to 8.33 μg g-1 in plants supplied with NH4+ (Figure 6B).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Open in a new tab

Effects of different nitrogen forms and drought stress on xylem (A) and leaf (B) ABA concentration. After 24 h of PEG treatment, xylem sap and leaves were harvested for ABA detection. The data represent the means of three replicates. The error bars indicate the ±SD. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments are indicated by different letters. Rice seedlings were supplied with ammonium or nitrate under control and drought stress simulation by adding 10% PEG6000 (NH4+ + PEG as ANP; NO3- + PEG as NNP).

Effect of Exogenous Abscisic Acid (ABA) on Root AQP Gene Expression

To further investigate the regulation by ABA of root AQP gene expression, exogenous ABA was applied to the roots. Under non-PEG treatment, exogenous ABA applied for 4 h decreased the expression of all PIP and TIP genes in plants supplied with either NH4+ or NO3-. Under PEG treatment, the application of exogenous ABA for 4 h increased PIP1;1, PIP1;2, PIP1;3, PIP2;1, TIP1;1, TIP2;1, and TIP2;2 mRNA levels compared to that in non-ABA-applied plants (Figure 7) supplied with either NH4+ or NO3-, but especially under NH4+ supply. After 24 h of ABA treatment, no increase in gene expression was observed compared with non-ABA application under PEG treatment, and the expression of some genes decreased (Supplementary Figure S2).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Open in a new tab

Effects of exogenous ABA on root PIP and TIP gene expression under non-drought stress (A) and drought stress (B) conditions. Exogenous ABA was applied to the nutrient solution, and the final concentration was 5 μM, as soon as drought stress was applied by using 10% PEG. After 4 h of ABA and/or drought stress treatment, root samples were harvested for gene expression analysis. The data were analyzed as in Figure 4. The treatments were ammonium (AN-control) and with ABA (AN + 5 μM ABA), nitrate (NN-control) and with ABA (NN + 5 μM ABA), ANP-control and ABA (ANP + 5 μM ABA), NNP-control and ABA (NNP + 5 μM ABA).

Discussion

Effect of Drought Stress on Root Water Uptake

Drought stress increased the root hydraulic conductivity (Lpr) in plants supplied with ammonium (Figure 3). Numerous studies have reported Lpr was regulated by drought stress in different plant species, e.g., maize (Hachez et al., 2012), cucumber (Qian et al., 2015), tobacco (Mahdieh et al., 2008), grapevine (Vandeleur et al., 2009), and rice (Yang et al., 2012; Grondin et al., 2016). In these studies, regulation of the Lpr was shown to be dependent on the duration of the stress, the species and even the cultivars. First, long-term drought stress decreases Lpr compared to short-term stress, which might increase Lpr. Grondin et al. (2016) analyzed the Lpr of six different rice cultivars under long term drought stress, and five of them showed obvious conductivity decrease. Our previous results demonstrated no significant difference in the Lpr during several weeks of drought stress compared with normal water treatment in rice plants supplied with ammonium, while Lpr decreased in plants supplied with nitrate under the same conditions (Yang et al., 2012). It is possible that the roots Lpr decreased to avoid water depletion when the plant suffers long-term drought stress. Considering short-term PEG stress (24 h), Lpr increased in plants supplied with ammonium (Figure 3). Compared to our results, Hachez et al. (2012) reported that cell hydraulic conductivity increased approximately fourfold when maize plants stressed with 10% PEG for 2 h. Second, the Lpr varied according to the species under drought stress. Qian et al. (2015) reported that both root and cell hydraulic conductivity decreased in cucumber upon 140 mM PEG treatment for 2 and 24 h, while in tobacco, the root water uptake ability decreased upon PEG treatment (Ψ = -0.35 MPa) for 24 h (Mahdieh et al., 2008). In maize and rice plants, the hydraulic conductivity was increased by short-term drought stress. Both increased and decreased Lpr could enhance drought tolerance, representing different regulation strategies.

Increasing evidence indicates that aquaporin plays vital roles in the process of root radial water transport and affect Lpr, for review see (Chaumont and Tyerman, 2014). The contribution of aquaporin to Lpr is generally high, up to 79% under well-watered conditions and 85% under drought stress in rice plants (Grondin et al., 2016). In the present study, we investigated root protoplast water permeability and PIP and TIP genes expression in response to PEG treatment in presence of different nitrogen forms. We observed that 4 h of drought stress decreased root protoplast Pos in plants supplied with either ammonium or nitrate, while 24 h of drought stress increased Pos in plants supplied with ammonium (Figures 3B,C), which is consistent with previous result (Ding et al., 2015). Interestingly, this is in accordance with the decreased expression of all PIP and TIP genes observed upon 4 h of drought stress in plants supplied with either ammonium or nitrate and the dramatic increase in expression in plants supplied with ammonium after 24 h of stress (Figure 4).

In the present study, drought stress in presence of ammonium induced a decrease in PIP2;5 gene expression after 4 h of treatment and an increase in its expression after 24 h (Figure 4). This flexible shift suggested that PIP2;5 plays an important role in regulating radial water transport under drought stress. Sakurai-Ishikawa et al. (2011) reported that OsPIP2;5 contributed significantly to water radial water movement during diurnal changes and mainly accumulated on the proximal end of the endodermis and in xylem parenchyma cells, where transport resistance is high. In maize plants, both 2 and 8 h of 10% PEG treatment increased ZmPIP2;5 gene expression and protein content (Hachez et al., 2012). Considering TIP genes, Li et al. (2008) found them to be tightly related to tolerance to various stresses, including dehydration, salinity, ABA and seed germination in rice plants. TIP1;2 and TIP2;2 facilitated water transport when expressed in Xenopus oocytes. In addition, a 10 h 15% PEG treatment increased significantly OsTIP1;1 expression, while in our study the expression of four TIP genes significantly increased after 24 h of PEG treatment compared to that after 4 h.

In conclusion, short-term 24 h PEG treatment increased root hydraulic conductivity, root protoplast water permeability and the expression of PIP and TIP genes, which might facilitate the water transport in and out the cells and the whole plant metabolism in plants supplied ammonium. However, after 4 h of PEG treatment, AQP expression and activity decreased to avoid cell dehydration in plants supplied with either ammonium or nitrate (Figure 4).

The Interaction between ABA Change and Aquaporin Expression Regulation in Roots under Drought Stress

We observed that root ABA accumulation peaked after 24 h of PEG treatment in plants supplied with ammonium and increased by approximately 10-fold (Figure 5). In xylem sap and leaves, drought stress also induced ABA accumulation under ammonium supply (Figure 6). However, there is limited evidence suggesting how nitrogen form and drought stress affect the root ABA concentration. Our results showed that there was a greater ABA concentration in rice plants supplied with ammonium rather than with nitrate under drought stress, while no significant difference was observed under normal water condition (Figure 5). In wheat, there was no difference in root ABA concentration between plants supplied with ammonium and those supplied with nitrate (Chen et al., 1998). Root or aerial tissues accumulate more ABA when NH4+ supplied as a sole nitrogen source under non-drought stress in castor bean (Peuke et al., 1994), pea (Zdunek and Lips, 2001), and tomato (Rahayu et al., 2005). In cucumber, a higher but not significant root ABA concentration was observed when supplied with nitrate compared with the ammonium supply. Under drought stress, ABA change varied with duration of stress and nitrogen form (Supplementary Figure S1). It was therefore speculated that plant ABA is dynamically dependent on the nitrogen form, the species and the water status.

In roots, ABA plays important roles in regulating radial water transport and AQP gene expression, and in most cases, ABA increases root AQP gene expression and Lpr (Jang et al., 2004; Zhu et al., 2005; Mahdieh and Mostajeran, 2009; Parent et al., 2009). We observed an expression decrease in PIP and TIP genes by when the plants are incubated with 5 μM ABA under non-drought stress (Figure 7A; Supplementary Figure S2A). Consistent with this result, Beaudette et al. (2007) reported that 0.01 and 100 μM ABA incubation for 24 h decreased PsPIP2;1 expression. However, they also demonstrated that 1 and 10 μM exogenous ABA increased PsPIP2;1 expression. In maize plants, 1 μM ABA increased root cell hydraulic conductivity from 10 min to 1 h incubation, followed by a dramatic decrease after 2 h, indicating a negative effect of long term ABA treatments on the root water radial transport. Lian et al. (2006) reported that upland and lowland rice have different PIP expression levels affected by exogenous ABA apply, even though different PIP genes exhibited different regulation. Based on this evidence, it became controversial how ABA affects root AQP expression and hydraulic conductivity (Lpr), which depend on ABA dose, time responses and interaction with drought stress. However, the above results are based on exogenous ABA treatment. Regardless of the different results of exogenous ABA treatment, the endogenous ABA level should be more positively related to root AQP expression and Lpr regulation (Parent et al., 2009). These authors demonstrated that ABA is essential for root AQP expression by investigating ABA deficiency and over-accumulation maize plants; ABA-accumulated maize plants showed higher root AQP expression, while ABA deficient plants showed lower root AQP expression.

Under drought stress, 5 μM exogenous ABA induced an up-regulation of PIP1;1, PIP1;2, PIP1;3, PIP2;1, TIP1;1, TIP2;1 and TIP2;2 genes, especially in plants supplied with ammonium (Figure 7B). Moreover, drought stress induced more ABA accumulation in roots supplied with ammonium after 24 h of treatment, when root PIP and TIP expression was up-regulated (Figure 5). Our results showed that root ABA accumulation increase AQP expression induced by drought stress. Meanwhile, the AQP expression decreased by 4 h of drought stress independent of ABA regulation. In addition, we observed a higher ABA level, which could explain why the Pos was higher under drought stress in cucumber supplied with nitrate than in that supplied with ammonium (Supplementary Figure S1B). Despite the different effects of nitrogen form and drought stress on rice and cucumber root water uptake, ABA accumulation increased the root and/or cell water hydraulics under drought stress.

In aerial xylem sap and leaves, we observed that ABA levels increased when the plants are supplied with ammonium under drought stress (Figure 6), in which root ABA accumulated 10-fold after 24 h of drought stress (Figure 5). Under drought stress, the stomatal conductivity decreased in leaves supplied with either nitrogen form, especially in plants supplied with nitrate (Figure 1). In previous study, digital infrared thermography (DIT) was employed to detect changes in leaf temperature, which negative associated with leaf transpiration rate (Wang et al., 2012). However, the leaf transpiration was regulated by stomatal conductivity, and therefore thermo image could be an indicator for leaf stomatal opening (Figure 2).

Interestingly, there were higher levels of ABA and stomatal conductivity under drought stress in plants supplied with ammonium rather than with nitrate, indicating that ABA is indispensable for plants under drought stress. Two factors might simultaneously explain the higher stomatal conductivity and ABA under drought stress in plants supplied with ammonium rather than nitrate. First, drought stress could induce the alkalization of apoplastic sap; this process has a crosstalk with nitrate metabolism (Ehlert et al., 2011; Korovetska et al., 2014). Under low pH, most of the leaf ABA was stored in the symplast (inactivation), while drought stress increased the pH, activating ABA, which would reside in the apoplast and enter the stomata (Wilkinson et al., 2007). In the present study, more ABA was stored in the symplast under drought stress in plants supplied with ammonium; in contrast, as most of the ABA resides in the apoplast under nitrate supply, even less ABA could induce the stomatal closure. To support this, plants fertilized with nitrate will tend to show high xylem and apoplastic pH (Supplementary Figure S3; Mengel et al., 1994; Muhling and Lauchli, 2001). Second, ABA accumulation is essential for shoots growing under drought stress (Koornneef et al., 1998; Sharp, 2002). Under drought stress, ABA-deficient mutants wilt and die. As a result, a higher ABA concentration might induce partial stomatal closure, further reducing water loss under drought stress in plant supplied with ammonium. Consistently, Li et al. (2012) showed that drought stress decreased the leaf water potential under nitrate supply, further inducing chloroplast downsizing.

Conclusion

Taken together, one of the possible mechanism of “ABA accumulation in enhanced seedling stage drought tolerance” is given in Figure 8. First, under drought stress, root PIP and TIP expression decreased immediately and intensely, while root ABA tended to accumulate. Second, root PIP and TIP expression increased with stress extension, resulting from endogenous ABA accumulation and further increasing root hydraulic conductivity. Third, root ABA accumulation induced aboveground ABA level increase, including in the leaves, as a result of stomatal closure (partially closure). Photosynthetic CO2 assimilation was maintained under drought stress in rice plants supplied with ammonium.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Open in a new tab

The mechanism by which ammonium nutrition enhances rice seedling drought tolerance.

Author Contributions

SG and LD designed the experiment. LD, YL, YW, and LG performed the experiments. LD analyzed the data. LD, MW, FC, QS, and SG wrote the paper.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB127403), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31172020 and 31272236), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M571768) and Jiangsu Postdoctoral Science Foundation (1402148C).

Abbreviations

AN

ammonium

ANP

ammonium with PEG

AQP

aquaporin

NN

nitrate

NNP

nitrate with PEG

PEG

polyethylene glycol

PIP

plasma membrane intrinsic protein

TIP

tonoplast membrane intrinsic protein

Footnotes

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2016.01206

Click here for additional data file. (504.2KB, DOCX)

References

  1. Beaudette P. C., Chlup M., Yee J., Emery R. J. (2007). Relationships of root conductivity and aquaporin gene expression in Pisum sativum: diurnal patterns and the response to HgCl2 and ABA. J. Exp. Bot. 58 1291–1300. 10.1093/jxb/erl289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chaumont F., Tyerman S. D. (2014). Aquaporins: highly regulated channels controlling plant water relations. Plant Physiol. 164 1600–1618. 10.1104/pp.113.233791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen J. G., Cheng S. H., Cao W., Zhou X. (1998). Involvement of endogenous plant hormones in the effect of mixed nitrogen source on growth and tillering of wheat. J. Plant Nutr. 21 87–97. 10.1080/01904169809365385 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies W. J., Zhang J. (1991). Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 42 55–76. 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.000415 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ding L., Gao C., Li Y., Li Y., Zhu Y., Xu G., et al. (2015). The enhanced drought tolerance of rice plants under ammonium is related to aquaporin (AQP). Plant Sci. 234 14–21. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ehlert C., Plassard C., Cookson S. J., Tardieu F., Simonneau T. (2011). Do pH changes in the leaf apoplast contribute to rapid inhibition of leaf elongation rate by water stress? Comparison of stress responses induced by polyethylene glycol and down-regulation of root hydraulic conductivity. Plant Cell Environ. 34 1258–1266. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02326.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao Y. X., Li Y., Yang X. X., Li H. J., Shen Q. R., Guo S. W. (2010). Ammonium nutrition increases water absorption in rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) under water stress. Plant Soil 331 193–201. 10.1007/s11104-009-0245-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grondin A., Mauleon R., Vadez V., Henry A. (2016). Root aquaporins contribute to whole plant water fluxes under drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Environ. 39 347–365. 10.1111/pce.12616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guóth A., Tari I., Csiszár J., Pécsváradi A., Cseuz L., Erdei L. (2009). Comparison of the drought stress responses of tolerant and sensitive wheat cultivars during grain filling: changes in flag leaf photosynthetic activity, ABA levels, and grain yield. J. Plant Growth Regul. 28 167–176. 10.1007/s00344-009-9085-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hachez C., Veselov D., Ye Q., Reinhardt H., Knipfer T., Fricke W., et al. (2012). Short-term control of maize cell and root water permeability through plasma membrane aquaporin isoforms. Plant Cell Environ. 35 185–198. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02429.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jang J. Y., Kim D. G., Kim Y. O., Kim J. S., Kang H. (2004). An expression analysis of a gene family encoding plasma membrane aquaporins in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 54 713–725. 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000040900.61345.a6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaldenhoff R., Ribas-Carbo M., Flexas J., Lovisolo C., Heckwolf M., Uehlein N. (2008). Aquaporins and plant water balance. Plant Cell Environ. 31 658–666. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01792.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Koornneef M., Léon-Kloosterziel K. M., Schwartz S. H., Zeevaart J. A. (1998). The genetic and molecular dissection of abscisic acid biosynthesis and signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 36 83–89. 10.1016/S0981-9428(98)80093-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Korovetska H., Novák O., Jůza O., Gloser V. (2014). Signalling mechanisms involved in the response of two varieties of Humulus lupulus L. to soil drying: i. changes in xylem sap pH and the concentrations of abscisic acid and anions. Plant Soil 380 375–387. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li G. W., Peng Y. H., Yu X., Zhang M. H., Cai W. M., Sun W. N., et al. (2008). Transport functions and expression analysis of vacuolar membrane aquaporins in response to various stresses in rice. J. Plant Physiol. 165 1879–1888. 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li Y., Ren B. B., Yang X. X., Xu G. H., Shen Q. R., Guo S. W. (2012). Chloroplast downsizing under nitrate nutrition restrained mesophyll conductance and photosynthesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Under Drought Conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 53 892–900. 10.1093/pcp/pcs032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lian H. L., Yu X., Lane D., Sun W. N., Tang Z. C., Su W. A. (2006). Upland rice and lowland rice exhibited different PIP expression under water deficit and ABA treatment. Cell Res. 16 651–660. 10.1038/sj.cr.7310068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mahdieh M., Mostajeran A. (2009). Abscisic acid regulates root hydraulic conductance via aquaporin expression modulation in Nicotiana tabacum. J. Plant Physiol. 166 1993–2003. 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mahdieh M., Mostajeran A., Horie T., Katsuhara M. (2008). Drought stress alters water relations and expression of PIP-type aquaporin genes in Nicotiana tabacum plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 49 801–813. 10.1093/pcp/pcn054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mengel K., Planker R., Hoffmann B. (1994). Relationship between leaf apoplast Ph and iron chlorosis of sunflower (Helianthus-Annuus L). J. Plant Nutr. 17 1053–1065. 10.1080/01904169409364787 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Muhling K. H., Lauchli A. (2001). Influence of chemical form and concentration of nitrogen on apoplastic pH of leaves. J. Plant Nutr. 24 399–411. 10.1081/PLN-100104968 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Parent B., Hachez C., Redondo E., Simonneau T., Chaumont F., Tardieu F. (2009). Drought and abscisic acid effects on aquaporin content translate into changes in hydraulic conductivity and leaf growth rate: a trans-scale approach. Plant Physiol. 149 2000–2012. 10.1104/pp.108.130682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Perez-Perez J. G., Dodd I. C. (2015). Sap fluxes from different parts of the rootzone modulate xylem ABA concentration during partial rootzone drying and re-wetting. J. Exp. Bot. 66 2315–2324. 10.1093/jxb/erv029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peuke A. D., Jeschke W. D., Hartung W. (1994). The uptake and flow of C. J. Exp. Bot. 45 741–747. [Google Scholar]
  25. Puertolas J., Alcobendas R., Alarcon J. J., Dodd I. C. (2013). Long-distance abscisic acid signalling under different vertical soil moisture gradients depends on bulk root water potential and average soil water content in the root zone. Plant Cell Environ. 36 1465–1475. 10.1111/pce.12076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Puertolas J., Conesa M. R., Ballester C., Dodd I. C. (2015). Local root abscisic acid (ABA) accumulation depends on the spatial distribution of soil moisture in potato: implications for ABA signalling under heterogeneous soil drying. J. Exp. Bot. 66 2325–2334. 10.1093/jxb/eru501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Qian Z. J., Song J. J., Chaumont F., Ye Q. (2015). Differential responses of plasma membrane aquaporins in mediating water transport of cucumber seedlings under osmotic and salt stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 38 461–473. 10.1111/pce.12319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rahayu Y. S., Walch-Liu P., Neumann G., Romheld V., Von Wiren N., Bangerth F. (2005). Root-derived cytokinins as long-distance signals for NO3–induced stimulation of leaf growth. J. Exp. Bot. 56 1143–1152. 10.1093/jxb/eri107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sakurai-Ishikawa J., Murai-Hatano M., Hayashi H., Ahamed A., Fukushi K., Matsumoto T., et al. (2011). Transpiration from shoots triggers diurnal changes in root aquaporin expression. Plant Cell Environ. 34 1150–1163. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02313.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schraut D., Heilmeier H., Hartung W. (2005). Radial transport of water and abscisic acid (ABA) in roots of Zea mays under conditions of nutrient deficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 56 879–886. 10.1093/jxb/eri080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sengupta D., Kannan M., Reddy A. R. (2011). A root proteomics-based insight reveals dynamic regulation of root proteins under progressive drought stress and recovery in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Planta 233 1111–1127. 10.1007/s00425-011-1365-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sharp R. E. (2002). Interaction with ethylene: changing views on the role of abscisic acid in root and shoot growth responses to water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25 211–222. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00798.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vandeleur R. K., Mayo G., Shelden M. C., Gilliham M., Kaiser B. N., Tyerman S. D. (2009). The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine. Plant Physiol. 149 445–460. 10.1104/pp.108.128645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang M., Ling N., Dong X., Zhu Y., Shen Q., Guo S. (2012). Thermographic visualization of leaf response in cucumber plants infected with the soil-borne pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 61 153–161. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wilkinson S., Bacon M. A., Davies W. J. (2007). Nitrate signalling to stomata and growing leaves: interactions with soil drying, ABA, and xylem sap pH in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 58 1705–1716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu W. F., Jia L. G., Shi W. M., Liang J. S., Zhou F., Li Q. F., et al. (2013). Abscisic acid accumulation modulates auxin transport in the root tip to enhance proton secretion for maintaining root growth under moderate water stress. New Phytol. 197 139–150. 10.1111/nph.12004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang X. X., Li Y., Ren B. B., Ding L., Gao C. M., Shen Q. R., et al. (2012). Drought-induced root aerenchyma formation restricts water uptake in rice seedlings supplied with nitrate. Plant Cell Physiol. 53 495–504. 10.1093/pcp/pcs003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zdunek E., Lips S. H. (2001). Transport and accumulation rates of abscisic acid and aldehyde oxidase activity in Pisum sativum L. in response to suboptimal growth conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 52 1269–1276. 10.1093/jexbot/52.359.1269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang J., Davies W. (1989). Abscisic acid produced in dehydrating roots may enable the plant to measure the water status of the soil. Plant Cell Environ. 12 73–81. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01918.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang J., Davies W. (1990). Does ABA in the xylem control the rate of leaf growth in soil-dried maize and sunflower plants? J. Exp. Bot. 41 1125–1132. 10.1093/jxb/41.9.1125 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang J., Jia W., Yang J., Ismail A. M. (2006). Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stresses. Field Crops Res. 97 111–119. 10.1007/s11103-015-0327-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhu C., Schraut D., Hartung W., Schäffner A. R. (2005). Differential responses of maize MIP genes to salt stress and ABA. J. Exp. Bot. 56 2971–2981. 10.1093/jxb/eri294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (504.2KB, DOCX)

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES