Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1982 Dec;35(12):1345–1348. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.12.1345

Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, radioimmunoassay, complement fixation, anticomplement immunofluorescence and passive haemagglutination techniques for detecting cytomegalovirus IgG antibody.

J C Booth, G Hannington, T M Bakir, H Stern, H Kangro, P D Griffiths, R B Heath
PMCID: PMC497975  PMID: 6294144

Abstract

The radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques were found to be comparable in sensitivity and specificity for detecting cytomegalovirus IgG antibody, and 10 to 100 times more sensitive than complement-fixation (CF), anticomplement immunofluorescence (ACIF) and passive haemagglutination (PHA). In screening tests for antibody, the frequency of false-positive and -negative results was 0.6% for RIA and ELISA, 1.5% for CF, 1.6% for ACIF and 3.6% for PHA. PHA was the least satisfactory test, largely because of technical problems. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important cause of congenital brain damage and is also a major complication of both prolonged immunosuppressive therapy, especially in patients with organ transplants, and multi-donor blood transfusions. For serological diagnosis of infection, as well as for screening for antibody in patients and in blood donors, the solid-phase indirect radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques offer distinct improvements in sensitivity over previous methods. Although the principle of both tests, based on the detection of antigen-antibody reactions by means of a labelled anti-antibody, is the same, each possesses its own particular technical advantages and disadvantages, and both require their own expensive equipment for the reading of the results. There is still a lack of data on how they compare in sensitivity and specificity. The present study was undertaken to compare the two methods for the detection of CMV IgG and to evaluate them against the older techniques of complement-fixation (CF), passive haemagglutination (PHA) and anticomplement immunofluorescence (ACIF).

Full text

PDF
1345

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernstein M. T., Stewart J. A. Indirect hemagglutination test for detection of antibodies to Cytomegalovirus. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Jan;21(1):84–89. doi: 10.1128/am.21.1.84-89.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Booth J. C., Hannington G., Aziz T. A., Stern H. Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique and complement-fixation test for estimation of cytomegalovirus IgG antibody. J Clin Pathol. 1979 Feb;32(2):122–127. doi: 10.1136/jcp.32.2.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cappel R., de Cuyper F., de Braekeleer J. Rapid detection of IgG and IgM antibodies for cytomegalovirus by the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Arch Virol. 1978;58(3):253–258. doi: 10.1007/BF01317608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cremer N. E., Hoffman M., Lennette E. H. Analysis of antibody assay methods and classes of viral antibodies in serodiagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Aug;8(2):153–159. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.2.153-159.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forghani B., Schmidt N. J., Lennette E. H. Antisera to human cytomegalovirus produced in hamsters: reactivity in radioimmunoassay and other antibody assay systems. Infect Immun. 1976 Nov;14(5):1184–1190. doi: 10.1128/iai.14.5.1184-1190.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Griffiths P. D., Buie K. J., Heath R. B. A comparison of complement fixation, indirect immunofluorescence for viral late antigens, and anti-complement immunofluorescence tests for the detection of cytomegalovirus specific serum antibodies. J Clin Pathol. 1978 Sep;31(9):827–831. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.9.827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ho M. Virus infections after transplantation in man. Brief review. Arch Virol. 1977;55(1-2):1–24. doi: 10.1007/BF01314475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jankowski M. A., Gut W., Nawrocka E., Kantoch M. Detection and differentiation of cytomegalovirus antibodies by radioimmunoassay. J Virol Methods. 1980;1(3):133–138. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(80)90009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kangro H. O. Evaluation of a radioimmunoassay for IgM-class antibodies against cytomegalovirus. Br J Exp Pathol. 1980 Oct;61(5):512–520. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kangro H. O., Pattison J. R., Heath R. B. The detection of rubella-specific IgM antibodies by radioimmunoassay. Br J Exp Pathol. 1978 Dec;59(6):577–583. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Knez V., Stewart J. A., Ziegler D. W. Cytomegalovirus specific IgM and IgG response in humans studied by radioimmunoassay. J Immunol. 1976 Nov;117(5 PT2):2006–2013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Krishna R. V., Meurman O. H., Ziegler T., Krech U. H. Solid-phase enzyme immunoassay for determination of antibodies to cytomegalovirus. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Jul;12(1):46–51. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.1.46-51.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lang D. J. Cytomegalovirus infections in organ transplantation and post transfusion. An hypothesis. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1972;37(4):365–377. doi: 10.1007/BF01241460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stern H. Cytomegalovirus infection in the neonate and its prevention. Postgrad Med J. 1977 Oct;53(624):588–591. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.53.624.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stern H. Cytomegalovirus infection in the neonate and its prevention. Postgrad Med J. 1977 Oct;53(624):588–591. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.53.624.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yeager A. S. Improved indirect hemagglutination test for cytomegalovirus using human O erythrocytes in lysine. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jul;10(1):64–68. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.1.64-68.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van Loon A. M., van der Logt J. T., van der Veen J. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for measurement of antibody against cytomegalovirus and rubella virus in a single serum dilution. J Clin Pathol. 1981 Jun;34(6):665–669. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.6.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES