Abstract
Growth of the fetus is highly sensitive to environmental perturbations, and disruption can lead to problems in pregnancy as well as later in life. This study investigates the relationship between maternal exposure to common plasticizers in pregnancy and fetal growth. Participants from a longitudinal birth cohort in Boston were recruited early in gestation and followed until delivery. Urine samples were collected at up to four time points and analyzed for concentrations of phthalate metabolites and bisphenol A (BPA). Ultrasound scans were performed at four time points during pregnancy for estimation of growth parameters, and birthweight was recorded at delivery. Growth measures were standardized to a larger population. For the present analysis we examined cross-sectional and repeated measures associations between exposure biomarkers and growth estimates in 482 non-anomalous singleton pregnancies. Cross-sectional associations between urinary phthalate metabolites or BPA and growth indices were imprecise. However, in repeated measures models, we observed significant inverse associations between di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) metabolites and estimated or actual fetal weight. An interquartile range increase in summed DEHP metabolites was associated with a 0.13 standard deviation decrease in estimated or actual fetal weight (95% confidence interval=−0.23, −0.03). Associations were consistent across different growth parameters (e.g., head circumference, femur length), and by fetal sex. No consistent associations were observed for other phthalate metabolites or BPA. Maternal exposure to DEHP during pregnancy was associated with decreased fetal growth, which could have repercussive effects.
Keywords: Endocrine disruptors, fetal growth, birthweight, growth restriction, plasticizers, plastics
1. Introduction
Reduced fetal growth is a well-recognized pregnancy endpoint of concern. While definitions and origins may differ, low birthweight, small for gestational age, and intrauterine growth restriction are all associated with increased risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity and have been linked to adverse health effects later in life.1, 2 The process of fetal development is highly sensitive to perturbations from environmental toxicant exposures.3 Maternal behaviors such as smoking are clearly linked to reduced birthweight,4 and evidence also strongly suggests that some classic environmental exposures, such as lead and persistent organic pesticides, are associated with reductions in fetal growth.3 Of emerging concern is the impact of non-persistent pollutants with widespread exposure, including a variety of chemicals found in plastics. Phthalate diesters and bisphenol-A (BPA) are used widely in these and other applications, and leach or are aerosolized into adjacent matrices which make for ready human exposure through ingestion or inhalation.5 Additionally, phthalates and occasionally BPA found in personal care products can be absorbed dermally. Despite rapid metabolism in the human body, contact is so frequent that phthalate metabolites and BPA in urine from pregnant mothers are detected almost ubiquitously in populations worldwide.6-8
A number of studies have examined the relationship between biomarkers of exposure to phthalates and BPA and fetal growth, with conflicting results.9-14 However, biologic plausibility exists for an impact of these chemicals on physical development. Phthalates and BPA have been shown to cause oxidative stress, hormonal disturbances, and epigenetic modifications that all could have deleterious effects on growth.15-19 Inconsistencies in previous studies of phthalate or BPA exposure and fetal growth may be due to the fact that the majority model associations with birthweight or other measures at delivery only.3, 20-23 Longitudinal studies with repeated ultrasound measurements taken during gestation have greater power to detect effects.24 Additionally, specific to these non-persistent chemicals, most studies utilize single spot urine concentrations of phthalate metabolite and BPA as indices of exposure;10, 20, 22, 25, 26 however, due to their short half-lives in the human body, measurements may not be representative of exposure over the course of pregnancy.27 In the present analysis we investigated longitudinal associations between maternal exposure to phthalates and BPA in pregnancy and fetal growth in women from a prospective birth cohort. Notably, this study leverages a robust design including longitudinal exposure biomarker (up to 4 per subject) and growth assessments (up to 4 per subject).
2. Methods
2.1. Study population
Pregnant women were recruited in Boston as part of the LIFECODES birth cohort study. Individuals were eligible for participation if they were less than 15 weeks pregnant, were carrying a singleton non-anomalous fetus, and were planning to deliver at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. At the initial study visit subjects provided informed consent and completed questionnaires detailing demographic information, personal and family health histories, and characteristics of pregnancy. Gestational age was calculated based on protocol established by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.28 Spot urine samples were collected at four time points (visits 1-4) during pregnancy, at median 10, 18, 26, and 35 weeks gestation, in polypropylene cups. Approximately 65% of urine samples were obtained in the morning (8am to 1pm) and the other 35% were collected in the afternoon or evening (after 1pm). At delivery (visit 5), birthweight was recorded. We selected 130 cases of singleton preterm birth, defined as delivery prior to 37 weeks completed gestation, as well as 352 random singleton term controls from the participants recruited between 2006 and 2008 to examine the relationship between urinary phthalate metabolites and BPA and preterm birth. Institutional Review Board approval for the case-control study was obtained from the University of Michigan and from Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
2.2. Fetal growth measurements
At the visit 1 ultrasound fetuses received a crown-rump length as part of the screen for aneuploidy. At visit 2 ultrasound scans were routinely performed for all study subjects for standard clinical assessments of fetal morphology. At visits 3 and 4, ultrasounds were not part of the study protocol. However, additional ultrasounds scans were also performed in cases where there was suspected abnormality of pregnancy (e.g., growth restriction, gestational diabetes, etc.) or at the patient’s request. For all ultrasounds, measurements were abstracted from scans by board certified sonologists in the departments of Radiology and Maternal-Fetal Medicine. We used the following measurements for this analysis: head circumference (HC); abdominal circumference (AC); and femur length (FL). Additionally, measurements were combined using the following formula of Hadlock to create estimates of fetal weight (EFW) at visits 2-4.29
In order to combine growth measurements across different time points during pregnancy for longitudinal models, we created z-scores of each ultrasound measurement. We used mean and standard deviation (SD) ultrasound measurements available on all non-anomalous singleton pregnancies with delivery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital from 2006-2012 (N=18,904) as our standard.30
2.3. Exposure assessment
Urine samples collected during pregnancy were analyzed for a panel of nine phthalate metabolites as well as total urinary BPA by NSF International (Ann Arbor, MI, USA).31 Briefly, urine samples undergo enzymatic deconjugation of glucuronidated metabolites, solid phase extraction, liquid chromatographic separation, and tandem mass spectrometry.31 Concentrations below the limit of detection (LOD) were kept as is if reported, and otherwise were replaced with the LOD divided by the square root of 2. Urinary specific gravity was measured using a digital handheld refractometer (Atago Company Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) as an indicator of urine dilution. In addition to individual phthalate metabolites, we also examined a molar sum of the di-2-ethyl- hexyl (DEHP) metabolites, including mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), mono-2-ethyl-5- hydroxyhexyl phthalate (MEHHP), mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate (MEOHP), and mono-2- ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate (MECPP). For modeling purposes, we calculated cumulative pregnancy exposure to phthalate metabolites or BPA defined as the geometric average of urinary biomarker concentrations collected up until the time of ultrasound for visits 1-4. Cumulative exposure at visit 5 (delivery) was identical to the exposure metric from visit 4, since urine samples were not collected for analysis at birth.
2.4. Statistical analysis
All analyses were performed in R version 3.2.1. All analyses using the combined case-control sample were weighted using inverse probability weights indicative of the probability of preterm birth case and control selection from the base cohort population.32 Thus, the results do not over represent associations within cases of preterm birth. We examined distributions of demographic characteristics within the study population using these weights. We also calculated percentiles of specific gravity corrected27 urinary phthalate metabolite measurements to present distributions.
To examine relationships between exposure and growth, we first used a cross-sectional approach to estimate associations between cumulative exposure at visit 5 (delivery) and birthweight alone. Crude models were adjusted for cumulative urinary specific gravity as well as gestational age at delivery. The fully adjusted model (Model 2) additionally included covariates that were associated with both exposures and outcome, and that impacted effect estimates by greater than 10%. These included maternal age, race/ethnicity (White, African American, Other), visit 1 body mass index (BMI; continuous), health insurance provider (private, public), and infant gender. Finally, we examined adjusted models stratified by infant sex as previous studies have identified sex differences in these relationships (Models 3 and 4 for males and females, respectively).14 Differences in coefficient estimates from male vs. female models were tested using a z statistic. We additionally created cross-sectional models with z-scored growth measures from visits 2-4 with the corresponding cumulative exposure metrics.
Our second modeling approach was to create linear mixed effects (LME) models of the relationship between repeated measures of cumulative exposure and each indicator of fetal growth using the R nlme package.33 As with cross-sectional models, these were created in crude, adjusted, and sex-stratified manners. For LME models we only included fetal growth measurements taken at visits 3-5, as there was poor variation in fetal growth measures taken at visit 1 and 2 in our dataset (see Fig. 1), which is consistent with observations in other studies.9, 34 However, we additionally created models containing measures from visit 2 for comparison. Effect estimates for all analyses were presented as SD change in growth measures in association with an interquartile range (IQR) increase in visit 4 cumulative and specific gravity corrected phthalate metabolite or BPA concentrations.
Fig. 1.
Fetal growth parameters in association with gestational age (in weeks) at measurement as well as respective visit, shown in red (visit 2), blue (visit 3), green (visit 4), and black (visit 5 or delivery) with median (range) of gestational age at each visit shown in the legend.
3. Results
Demographic characteristics are presented in Table 1 for the 482 subjects in this study population. As previously reported, the participants were primarily White (59%), had private health insurance providers (81%), indicating high socioeconomic status, and many were college graduates (41%).35 With weightings, the populations had a preterm delivery rate that was similar to that observed in the general US population (12%). Concentrations of cumulative phthalate metabolite and BPA concentrations from urine samples are shown in Table 2, along with median (25th, 75th percentiles) gestational age at sample collection. DEHP metabolite concentrations, particularly MEHP, were higher in our population compared to those observed in other studies of pregnant women. This may be due to higher exposure levels in the Boston area, as noted in a previous study of phthalates in pregnancy,36 or due to laboratory differences.27 Concentrations of other phthalate metabolites and BPA were similar to those observed in other US studies.22, 36 We previously published intraclass correlation coefficients for urinary phthalate metabolites and BPA in this study population and observed similar variability over pregnancy to what has been observed in other studies.27, 36, 37 Namely, DEHP metabolites showed greater variability over pregnancy compared to other urinary phthalate metabolites, and BPA was much less reliable than other exposure measurements.27, 37
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of study population and standard deviation change in z-score (95% confidence interval, CI) of birthweight or repeated measures of weight from study visits 3-5a in demographic group compared to reference.
N (weighted %) |
Association with weight z- score (visit 5 only)b |
Association with weight z- score (visits 3-5)c |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
SD Δ (95% CI) | p | SD Δ (95% CI) | p | |||
Race/ethnicity | White | 282 (59) | ||||
African American | 77 (16) | −0.40 (−0.66, −0.14) | <0.01 | −0.49 (−0.72, −0.26) | <0.01 | |
Other | 123 (26) | −0.06 (−0.28, 0.15) | 0.58 | −0.16 (−0.35, 0.04) | 0.12 | |
BMI category | < 25 kg/m2 | 250 (53) | ||||
25-30 kg/m2 | 126 (27) | 0.27 (0.06, 0.49) | 0.01 | 0.22 (0.02, 0.42) | 0.03 | |
>30 kg/m2 | 102 (20) | 0.30 (0.06, 0.54) | 0.02 | 0.27 (0.06, 0.48) | 0.01 | |
Health insurance | Private | 385 (81) | ||||
Public | 85 (19) | −0.24 (−0.48, −0.003) | 0.048 | −0.41 (−0.63, −0.20) | <0.01 | |
Education | High school | 68 (14) | ||||
Technical school | 77 (16) | −0.16 (−0.50, 0.17) | 0.35 | 0.04 (−0.25, 0.34) | 0.78 | |
Junior/some college | 139 (30) | 0.17 (−0.13, 0.46) | 0.28 | 0.25 (−0.01, 0.52) | 0.06 | |
College graduate | 187 (41) | 0.17 (−0.11, 0.46) | 0.23 | 0.32 (0.07, 0.58) | 0.01 | |
Gender | Male | 214 (45) | ||||
Female | 268 (55) | 0.29 (0.10, 0.47) | <0.01 | 0.25 (0.09, 0.42) | <0.01 | |
Preterm | No | 352 (88) | ||||
Yes | 130 (12) | 0.14 (−0.26, 0.55) | 0.49 | −0.05 (−0.23, 0.13) | 0.572 | |
IVF | No | 450 (94) | ||||
Yes | 32 (6) | −0.03 (−0.41, 0.35) | 0.88 | −0.06 (−0.38, 0.27) | 0.73 | |
Parity | Nulliparous | 215 (45) | ||||
Parous | 267 (55) | 0.38 (0.20, 0.56) | <0.01 | 0.26 (0.09, 0.42) | <0.01 | |
Tobacco use | No | 445 (94) | ||||
Yes | 31 (6) | −0.42 (−0.80, −0.03) | 0.03 | −0.26 (−0.60, 0.08) | 0.13 | |
Alcohol use | No | 452 (95) | ||||
Yes | 20 (5) | 0.17 (−0.26, 0.60) | 0.44 | 0.25 (−0.20, 0.69) | 0.28 |
BMI, body mass index; IVF, in vitro fertilization.
Visits 3-4 represent ultrasound estimates of fetal weight; Visit 5 represents birthweight.
Estimates from linear regression model of covariate in association with birthweight z-score, adjusted for gestational age at delivery and weighted for study design.
Estimates from LME model of covariate in association with repeated measures of fetal weight (visits 3-5), adjusted for gestational age at ultrasound/delivery (time-varying) and weighted for study design. LME models include random intercepts for subject ID and random slopes for gestational age at ultrasound/delivery.
N missing (%) for each of the covariates is as follows: BMI=4 (0.8%); health insurance=12 (2.5%); education=11 (2.3%); tobacco use=6 (1.2%); and alcohol use=10 (2.1%).
Table 2.
Medians (25th, 75th percentiles) of cumulative urinary phthalate metabolite and bisphenol-A levels (μg/L) and gestational age at sample collectiona in study population by visit (N=479 at visit 1,b N=482 at subsequent visits). All measures standardized to urinary specific gravity.
Visit 1 | Visit 2 | Visit 3 | Visit 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
50th (25th, 75th) | 50th (25th, 75th) | 50th (25th, 75th) | 50th (25th, 75th) | |
| ||||
Gestational age (weeks) | 9.71 (8.29, 11.4) | 18.0 (17.0, 18.9) | 26.1 (25.1, 27.0) | 35.1 (34.4, 35.9) |
MEHP (μg/L) | 10.1 (5.15, 24.8) | 10.9 (5.67, 21.9) | 11.2 (5.75, 18.9) | 10.5 (6.14, 18.3) |
MEHHP (μg/L) | 33.5 (17.4, 80.2) | 34.2 (20.3, 67.1) | 32.8 (18.6, 57.0) | 34.1 (19.9, 57.4) |
MEOHP (μg/L) | 16.8 (8.57, 40.3) | 17.1 (10.3, 35.2) | 16.7 (10.4, 31.6) | 18.3 (11.1, 29.8) |
MECPP (μg/L) | 40.3 (18.9, 107) | 40.3 (21.5, 83.0) | 40.0 (21.6, 73.1) | 42.9 (23.7, 70.7) |
∑DEHP (μmol/L) | 0.37 (0.18, 0.82) | 0.36 (0.22, 0.74) | 0.35 (0.22, 0.63) | 0.39 (0.22, 0.62) |
MBzP (μg/L) | 6.22 (3.36, 13.6) | 6.29 (3.62, 12.8) | 6.19 (3.61, 12.0) | 6.37 (3.70, 11.9) |
MBP (μg/L) | 16.1 (10.8, 26.8) | 16.1 (10.8, 26.1) | 16.5 (11.1, 24.0) | 16.7 (11.7, 25.0) |
MiBP (μg/L) | 7.14 (4.50, 11.1) | 7.10 (4.61, 11.1) | 7.13 (4.75, 11.0) | 7.66 (5.03, 10.9) |
MEP (μg/L) | 122 (48.8, 357) | 133 (56.2, 335) | 136 (59.4, 300) | 130 (62.4, 312) |
MCPP (μg/L) | 1.69 (1.06, 3.41) | 1.84 (1.16, 3.10) | 1.88 (1.18, 3.23) | 1.88 (1.20, 3.02) |
BPA (μg/L) | 1.28 (0.75, 2.08) | 1.33 (0.81, 1.99) | 1.33 (0.92, 1.92) | 1.32 (0.94, 1.87) |
MEHP, mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate; MEHHP, mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate; MEOHP, mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate; MECPP, mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate; <<DEHP, summed di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate metabolites; MBzP, mono-benzyl phthalate; MBP, mono-<<-butyl phthalate; MiBP, mono-iso-butyl phthalate; MEP, mono-ethyl phthalate; MCPP, mono-carboxypropyl phthalate; BPA, bisphenol-A.
Gestational age at sample collection indicates gestational age of specific visit. Cumulative exposure metrics at each visit represent geometric average of all measures taken for each individual prior to and including that visit (e.g., visit 2 represents the geometric average of levels from visit 1 and visit 2).
N=479 for all urinary phthalate metabolite measurements at visit 1, however N=481 for urinary BPA measurements at visit 1.
Raw (i.e., non z-scored) distributions of HC, AC, FL, and EFW/birthweight by gestational age are displayed in Fig. 1. The number of measurements available at visits 3 (n=225) and 4 (n=246 for HC, n=249 for other metrics) were fewer than those available from visit 2 (n=427 for HC, AC, and EFW; n=428 for FL) or visit 5 (n=482).
Table 1 also shows associations between maternal or fetal characteristics and growth. We observed significantly lower birthweight z-scores for infants born to African American compared to White subjects, to mothers who had a visit 1 BMI <25 kg/m2 compared to those with a BMI 25-30 kg/m2 or 30+ kg/m2, to mothers who used tobacco during pregnancy or who were nulliparous, and for male vs. female fetuses. Using LME to look at the association between demographics and repeated z-scores of weight at visits 3-5, effect estimates were similar in direction but generally larger in magnitude with narrower confidence intervals (CIs) compared to those from the cross-sectional analysis.
Table 3 displays cross-sectional associations between cumulative exposures (geometric averages from visits 1-4) and birthweight z-scores from the three different modeling approaches. In Model 1, associations were consistently negative but not statistically significant, with the exception of the association with mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP; SD Δ with IQR increase=−0.12, 95% CI= −0.22, −0.02). (Associations were similar in a crude model restricted to subjects with a complete set of covariates, N=466, data not shown.) In the fully adjusted model (Model 2), associations were again primarily inverse but imprecise. Finally, when adjusted models were stratified by infant sex, no associations were statistically significant but effect estimates were consistently inverse and largest in magnitude between DEHP metabolites, MBP, and BPA and birthweight z-scores in male infants. Cross sectional associations between cumulative exposure and z-scores of HC, AC, FL, and EFW from visits 2-4 are shown in Supplemental Table 1. Few associations were observed at visit 2, but associations at visits 3 and 4 were consistently negative between DEHP metabolites and growth indices.
Table 3.
Standard deviation change in z-score (95% confidence intervals) for birth weight in association with an interquartile range increase in cumulative urinary phthalate metabolite or bisphenol-A concentrations.a
Model 1 (N=482) Crude |
Model 2 (N=466) Adjusted |
Model 3 (N=209) Male infants only |
Model 4 (N=257) Female infants only |
p for differenceb |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
SD Δ (95% CI) | p | SD Δ (95% CI) | p | SD Δ (95% CI) | p | SD Δ (95% CI) | p | ||
MEHP | −0.03 (−0.14, 0.09) | 0.66 | −0.04 (−0.16, 0.07) | 0.45 | −0.13 (−0.30, 0.03) | 0.12 | 0.02 (−0.14, 0.18) | 0.81 | 0.20 |
MEHHP | −0.02 (−0.14, 0.10) | 0.77 | −0.05 (−0.17, 0.07) | 0.39 | −0.11 (−0.28, 0.06) | 0.21 | 0.01 (−0.16, 0.18) | 0.92 | 0.33 |
MEOHP | −0.03 (−0.15, 0.09) | 0.60 | −0.07 (−0.18, 0.05) | 0.24 | −0.13 (−0.29, 0.04) | 0.13 | −0.01 (−0.17, 0.16) | 0.91 | 0.32 |
MECPP | −0.04 (−0.16, 0.07) | 0.47 | −0.08 (−0.2, 0.03) | 0.16 | −0.11 (−0.27, 0.05) | 0.19 | −0.05 (−0.22, 0.12) | 0.54 | 0.65 |
∑DEHP | −0.05 (−0.17, 0.08) | 0.45 | −0.09 (−0.21, 0.03) | 0.14 | −0.13 (−0.30, 0.04) | 0.13 | −0.04 (−0.22, 0.13) | 0.62 | 0.49 |
MBzP | −0.03 (−0.14, 0.09) | 0.63 | 0.05 (−0.08, 0.17) | 0.45 | −0.05 (−0.22, 0.13) | 0.60 | 0.13 (−0.06, 0.31) | 0.18 | 0.18 |
MBP | −0.12 (−0.22, −0.02) | 0.02 | −0.08 (−0.19, 0.02) | 0.11 | −0.12 (−0.27, 0.04) | 0.16 | −0.07 (−0.21, 0.07) | 0.33 | 0.67 |
MiBP | −0.05 (−0.15, 0.06) | 0.39 | 0.03 (−0.08, 0.14) | 0.63 | 0.05 (−0.11, 0.21) | 0.54 | 0.01 (−0.15, 0.17) | 0.90 | 0.73 |
MEP | −0.10 (−0.22, 0.03) | 0.13 | −0.05 (−0.18, 0.08) | 0.46 | −0.06 (−0.24, 0.11) | 0.48 | −0.03 (−0.22, 0.16) | 0.76 | 0.80 |
MCPP | −0.06 (−0.16, 0.04) | 0.23 | −0.08 (−0.18, 0.03) | 0.14 | −0.05 (−0.19, 0.08) | 0.45 | −0.10 (−0.25, 0.06) | 0.21 | 0.67 |
BPA | −0.08 (−0.20, 0.04) | 0.20 | −0.04 (−0.17, 0.09) | 0.56 | −0.10 (−0.27, 0.08) | 0.27 | 0.03 (−0.17, 0.22) | 0.79 | 0.35 |
Cumulative exposure concentration represented by geometric average of urinary concentrations available from visits 1-4.
p-value calculated from Z-statistic for comparison of beta coefficients and standard errors for male and female models.
Note: Model 1: Adjusted for cumulative urinary specific gravity and gestational age at delivery. Model 2: Additionally adjusted for maternal age, race/ethnicity, visit 1 body mass index, health insurance provider, and infant gender. Model 3: Fully adjusted model of male infants only. Model 4: Fully adjusted model of female infants only.
Next we utilized LME models to examine associations between repeated z-scores of HC, AC, FL, and EFW (visits 3-4) or birthweight (visit 5) and cumulative exposures. Adjusted associations are presented in Table 4. MECPP and ∑DEHP were significantly associated with decreases in each of these growth metrics with similar effect sizes. For example, for ∑DEHP, the effect sizes were as follows for each outcome measure: HC (SD Δ=−0.11, 95% CI=−0.21, 0.001); AC (SD Δ=−0.14, 95% CI=−0.26, −0.03); FL (SD Δ=−0.13, 95% CI=−0.25, −0.01); and estimated or actual fetal weight (SD Δ=−0.13, 95% CI=−0.23, −0.03). No associations were detected between other phthalate metabolites or BPA and fetal growth parameters with the exception of mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP), which was inversely associated with HC only. For comparison, associations utilizing visits 2-5 are displayed in Supplemental Table 2. No significant associations were observed when the second visit was included in LME models. Finally, we observed similar effect estimates in male and female fetuses in sex-stratified models (Supplemental Tables 3 and 4, respectively).
Table 4.
Standard deviation change in z-score (95% confidence intervals) for ultrasound and/or delivery measures of growth (visits 3-5) in association with an interquartile range increase in cumulative urinary phthalate metabolite or bisphenol-A concentrations.a Results from adjustedb linear mixed effects models with random intercepts for subject ID and random slopes for gestational age at ultrasound.
Head circumference (visits 3-4; N=459) |
Abdominal circumference (visits 3-4; N=462) |
Femur length (visits 3-4; N=462) | Weight (visits 3-5; N=928) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
SD Δ (95% CI) | p | SD Δ (95% CI) | p | SD Δ (95% CI) | p | SD Δ (95% CI) | p | |
MEHP | −0.09 (−0.20, 0.01) | 0.09 | −0.10 (−0.22, 0.01) | 0.08 | −0.11 (−0.22, 0.01) | 0.08 | −0.08 (−0.18, 0.01) | 0.09 |
MEHHP | −0.04 (−0.15, 0.07) | 0.45 | −0.07 (−0.19, 0.04) | 0.22 | −0.09 (−0.21, 0.03) | 0.14 | −0.08 (−0.18, 0.02) | 0.10 |
MEOHP | −0.08 (−0.18, 0.03) | 0.14 | −0.10 (−0.21, 0.004) | 0.06 | −0.11 (−0.22, 0.01) | 0.07 | −0.10 (−0.20, −0.01) | 0.03 |
MECPP | −0.11 (−0.21, −0.01) | 0.03 | −0.12 (−0.23, −0.02) | 0.02 | −0.12 (−0.23, −0.01) | 0.03 | −0.13 (−0.22, −0.03) | <0.01 |
∑DEHP | −0.11 (−0.21, 0.001) | 0.05 | −0.14 (−0.26, −0.03) | 0.02 | −0.13 (−0.25, −0.01) | 0.03 | −0.13 (−0.23, −0.03) | <0.01 |
MBzP | −0.13 (−0.25, −0.01) | 0.04 | −0.05 (−0.18, 0.08) | 0.47 | −0.01 (−0.15, 0.12) | 0.83 | 0.005 (−0.10, 0.11) | 0.93 |
MBP | −0.004 (−0.08, 0.07) | 0.91 | −0.05 (−0.13, 0.03) | 0.21 | −0.03 (−0.12, 0.05) | 0.41 | −0.05 (−0.13, 0.02) | 0.16 |
MiBP | −0.03 (−0.14, 0.07) | 0.52 | −0.07 (−0.18, 0.04) | 0.23 | 0.01 (−0.10, 0.13) | 0.81 | 0.003 (−0.09, 0.10) | 0.95 |
MEP | −0.10 (−0.22, 0.03) | 0.13 | −0.04 (−0.18, 0.09) | 0.56 | −0.09 (−0.22, 0.05) | 0.22 | −0.07 (−0.18, 0.04) | 0.22 |
MCPP | −0.005 (−0.09, 0.08) | 0.91 | 0.00 (−0.10, 0.10) | 1.00 | −0.05 (−0.15, 0.05) | 0.35 | −0.03 (−0.12, 0.05) | 0.41 |
BPA | −0.02 (−0.14, 0.10) | 0.73 | −0.06 (−0.19, 0.07) | 0.36 | −0.09 (−0.22, 0.04) | 0.18 | −0.07 (−0.17, 0.04) | 0.20 |
Cumulative exposure concentration represented by geometric average of urinary concentrations available from visits 1-4.
Models adjusted for cumulative urinary specific gravity, gestational age at ultrasound, maternal age, race/ethnicity, visit 1 body mass index, health insurance provider, and infant gender.
4. Discussion
When we applied a longitudinal analysis to examine the relationship between average exposure measures and growth we observed inverse associations between head and abdominal circumferences, femur length, and estimated fetal weight and ∑DEHP metabolites. Within the DEHP metabolites, associations were strongest for MECPP. An IQR increase in ∑DEHP was associated with a 0.13 SD decrease in estimated fetal weight in reference to the standard population. No consistent associations were observed for other phthalate metabolites or for BPA. Cross-sectional associations between exposure biomarkers and ultrasound or delivery indices of weight were similar in direction but lacked precision. Additionally, we detected no differences in effect by sex of the fetus in linear mixed models, although in the cross-sectional analysis of average exposure over pregnancy in relation to birthweight effect estimates were greater in magnitude (i.e., more negative) for male compared to female infants.
A number of studies have investigated the relationship between maternal phthalate exposure during pregnancy and fetal growth, but the preponderance of this data utilizes birthweight or other measures at delivery alone.13, 20 Furthermore, the majority of these studies use single spot urine samples to approximate exposure,10, 22 or measurement in other matrices during pregnancy (e.g., maternal serum)38 or at delivery (e.g., cord blood, meconium).23 Phthalate metabolites measured in blood have even shorter half-lives compared to urinary biomarkers, and in cases where phthalate diesters (rather than metabolites) are measured in these matrices there is increased probability of sample contamination at the collection, processing, or measurement steps.39, 40 Additionally, the majority of these studies had sample sizes of ~200 or smaller.14, 20, 41-43 These previous investigations have had mixed, but largely null, results.10, 13, 14, 20, 23, 38, 41-46 The largest studies (n~300-400) reported null associations between phthalate metabolite measurements from spot urine samples collected during pregnancy and birthweight, length, and head circumference.10, 13
Two studies utilized repeated ultrasound measures in combination with birthweight to examine the associations between phthalate exposure during pregnancy and fetal growth. One examining maternal occupational exposure via job exposure matrix found an inverse association with fetal growth (n=4680).47 Another study in the INMA-Sabadell Spanish cohort included repeated ultrasound measures from three time points during pregnancy (12, 20, and 34 weeks gestation) as well as at delivery, in combination with repeated (2) measures of urinary phthalate metabolites during pregnancy (n=390 for phthalate analysis).9 Associations in that study were largely null.9 A notable difference between that analysis and the one presented here is that we combined z-scored growth measures to perform a repeated measures analysis, whereas the Spanish group performed cross-sectional analyses or modeled the relationship with change in SD scores between the first and second visits.9 Similarly, we detected few and unstable associations in our cross sectional analyses, but we observed significant associations between DEHP metabolites and decreased fetal weight in repeated measures models. Another major difference between these studies is that our primary results come from mothers who received clinically indicated ultrasounds later in pregnancy, which was not part of our study protocol. Thus, these findings may reflect relationships that are associated with the underlying clinical indications for the ordered ultrasound exams, and may not be detectable in a healthier population.
A number of studies have also investigated associations between BPA exposure and fetal growth, but again most relied solely on birthweight or other measures at delivery. The evidence here is also conflicting.10, 12, 13, 25, 48-50 Again, this may be due to suboptimal exposure assessment approaches. Two studies performed longitudinal analyses examining repeated urinary BPA concentrations as well as ultrasound scans to estimate the association with fetal growth.9, 11 In the INMA-Sabadell cohort described above, no associations between growth indices and BPA were observed.9 However, in the Generation R study, significant inverse associations were observed between urinary BPA measurements and fetal growth, with clearly improved power to detect effects with additional (up to three per subject) exposure estimates.11 In our analysis we observed no associations between BPA and growth indices.
The greatest strength of our study was having 4 repeated measures of urinary phthalate metabolites and BPA across pregnancy, the largest number of measures in any study of exposure and fetal growth to date. Additionally, our study benefited from repeated ultrasound measurements taken across pregnancy, the latter of which we were able standardize to those taken from a large population of women in Boston. A particular strength of this study was our availability of repeated ultrasound measures from later (>22 weeks) in pregnancy. Other studies in this vein have noted that low variation in ultrasound measures taken early in gestation may be the root of inability to detect effects.9, 34, 51 Our ability to detect effects in this study may alternatively suggest that the mechanism by which DEHP metabolites impact pregnancy is specific to a susceptibility later in gestation. Future investigation of this question should be pursued in animal models and rigorous human observational studies.
Our study was limited by fewer measurements of fetal growth available from later study time points. This was due to the fact that ultrasound measurements were not planned as part of the original study. Importantly, receiving an ultrasound later in pregnancy was not associated with exposure or covariates in our data, so that this limitation would not differentially bias our findings (data not shown). However, the generalizability of our results may extend only to higher risk pregnancies in which subjects are asked by their physicians to receive additional ultrasounds. Models stratified by fetal sex were also limited in terms of sample size, and our conclusions regarding minimal sex differences in effects should be verified in larger populations. Finally, we performed a large number of comparisons in the present analysis and some of the associations observed may have been due to chance.
5. Conclusions
We observed associations between maternal exposure to DEHP metabolites and decreased fetal growth during pregnancy. This is the first study to detect such associations in a population with repeated measures of urinary phthalate metabolite measurements as well as combined ultrasound and birth indices of growth. Due to our study design, these results may be specific to pregnancies for which ultrasound examinations are clinically indicated later in pregnancy, but this limitation in generalizability does not make the findings less impactful. Preventing causes of fetal growth retardation in this subset could make substantial contributions to preventing the negative consequences of this outcome.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
Exposure to phthalates and BPA in pregnancy may impact development of the fetus.
We measured exposure biomarkers at 4 visits during gestation on 482 women.
We used ultrasound scans from pregnancy and birthweight to examine fetal growth.
Urinary di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate metabolites were associated with reduced growth.
This is the first study with a robust repeated measures design to detect this relationship.
Acknowledgements
We thank Gerry Pace and colleagues at NSF International (Ann Arbor, MI) for theier analysis of urinary phthalate metabolites. Initial funding for the recruitment of the birth cohort was provided by Abbott Diagnostics (9MZ-04-06N03). All other funding was provided by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health (R01ES018872, P42ES017198, P01ES022844, P50ES026049, and P30ES017885). Support for Dr. Ferguson was provided in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
ABBREVIATIONS
- BPA
Bisphenol A
- MEHP
mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate
- EHHP
mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate
- EOHP
mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate
- ECPP
mono-2-ethyl-5- carboxypentyl phthalate
- MBzP
mono-benzyl phthalate
- MBP
mono-n-butyl phthalat
- MiBP
mono-iso-butyl phthalate
- MEP
mono-ethyl phthalat
- MCPP
mono-3-carboxypropyl phthalate
- HC
head circumferen
- AC
abdominal circumferen
- FL
femur leng
- EFW
estimated fetal weigh
- SD
standard deviati
- LOD
limit of detectio
- BMI
body mass inde
- LME
liner mixed effect
- IQR
interquartile rang
- CI
confidence interval
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Barker DJ, Eriksson JG, Forsen T, Osmond C. Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of effects and biological basis. International journal of epidemiology. 2002;31(6):1235–1239. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McCormick MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. New England journal of medicine. 1985;312(2):82–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198501103120204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wigle DT, Arbuckle TE, Turner MC, Berube A, Yang Q, Liu S, et al. Epidemiologic evidence of relationships between reproductive and child health outcomes and environmental chemical contaminants. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B. 2008;11(5-6):373–517. doi: 10.1080/10937400801921320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang X, Zuckerman B, Pearson C, Kaufman G, Chen C, Wang G, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking, metabolic gene polymorphism, and infant birth weight. Jama. 2002;287(2):195–202. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heudorf U, Mersch-Sundermann V, Angerer J. Phthalates: toxicology and exposure. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2007;210(5):623–634. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Adibi JJ, Perera FP, Jedrychowski W, Camann DE, Barr D, Jacek R, et al. Prenatal exposures to phthalates among women in New York City and Krakow, Poland. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2003;111(14):1719. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Casas L, Fernández MF, Llop S, Guxens M, Ballester F, Olea N, et al. Urinary concentrations of phthalates and phenols in a population of Spanish pregnant women and children. Environment international. 2011;37(5):858–866. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ye X, Pierik FH, Hauser R, Duty S, Angerer J, Park MM, et al. Urinary metabolite concentrations of organophosphorous pesticides, bisphenol A, and phthalates among pregnant women in Rotterdam, the Netherlands: the Generation R study. Environmental research. 2008;108(2):260–267. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Casas M, Valvi D, Ballesteros-Gomez A, Gascon M, Fernández MF, Garcia-Esteban R, et al. Exposure to Bisphenol A and Phthalates during Pregnancy and Ultrasound Measures of Fetal Growth in the INMA-Sabadell Cohort. Environmental health perspectives. 2015 doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Philippat C, Mortamais M, Chevrier C, Petit C, Calafat AM, Ye X, et al. Exposure to phthalates and phenols during pregnancy and offspring size at birth. Environmental health perspectives. 2012;120(3):464–470. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Snijder CA, Heederik D, Pierik FH, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW, Koch HM, et al. Fetal growth and prenatal exposure to bisphenol A: the generation R study. Environmental health perspectives. 2013;121(3):393–398. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Veiga-Lopez A, Kannan K, Liao C, Ye W, Domino SE, Padmanabhan V. Gender-Specific Effects on Gestational Length and Birth Weight by Early Pregnancy BPA Exposure. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2015:2015–1724. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1724. jc. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wolff MS, Engel SM, Berkowitz GS, Ye X, Silva MJ, Zhu C, et al. Prenatal phenol and phthalate exposures and birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(8):1092–1097. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhao Y, Chen L, Li L-x, Xie C-m, Li D, Shi H-j, et al. Gender-specific relationship between prenatal exposure to phthalates and intrauterine growth restriction. Pediatric research. 2014 doi: 10.1038/pr.2014.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tetz LM, Cheng AA, Korte CS, Giese RW, Wang P, Harris C, et al. Mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate induces oxidative stress responses in human placental cells in vitro. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 2013;268(1):47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hulak M, Gazo I, Shaliutina A, Linhartova P. In vitro effects of bisphenol A on the quality parameters, oxidative stress, DNA integrity and adenosine triphosphate content in sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) spermatozoa. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2013;158(2):64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Medici M, Timmermans S, Visser W, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, et al. Maternal thyroid hormone parameters during early pregnancy and birth weight: the Generation R Study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2012;98(1):59–66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shields BM, Knight BA, Hill A, Hattersley AT, Vaidya B. Fetal thyroid hormone level at birth is associated with fetal growth. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2011;96(6):E934–E938. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sant KE, Dolinoy DC, Jilek JL, Shay BJ, Harris C. Mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP) alters histiotrophic nutrition pathways and epigenetic processes in the developing conceptus. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang P-C, Kuo P-L, Chou Y-Y, Lin S-J, Lee C-C. Association between prenatal exposure to phthalates and the health of newborns. Environment International. 2009;35(1):14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Veiga-Lopez A, Kannan K, Liao C, Ye W, Domino SE, Padmanabhan V. Gender-Specific Effects on Gestational Length and Birth Weight by Early Pregnancy BPA Exposure. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2015;100(11):E1394–E1403. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wolff MS, Engel SM, Berkowitz GS, Ye X, Silva MJ, Zhu C, et al. Prenatal phenol and phthalate exposures and birth outcomes. Environmental health perspectives. 2008;116(8):1092. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang Y, Lin L, Cao Y, Chen B, Zheng L, Ge R-S. Phthalate levels and low birth weight: a nested case-control study of Chinese newborns. The Journal of pediatrics. 2009;155(4):500–504. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Smarr MM, Vadillo-Ortega F, Castillo-Castrejon M, O’Neill MS. The use of ultrasound measurements in environmental epidemiological studies of air pollution and fetal growth. Current opinion in pediatrics. 2013;25(2):240. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835e1e74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huo W, Xia W, Wan Y, Zhang B, Zhou A, Zhang Y, et al. Maternal urinary bisphenol A levels and infant low birth weight: A nested case–control study of the Health Baby Cohort in China. Environment international. 2015;85:96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee B-E, Park H, Hong Y-C, Ha M, Kim Y, Chang N, et al. Prenatal bisphenol A and birth outcomes: MOCEH (Mothers and Children's Environmental Health) study. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2014;217(2):328–334. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ferguson KK, McElrath TF, Ko Y-A, Mukherjee B, Meeker JD. Variability in urinary phthalate metabolite levels across pregnancy and sensitive windows of exposure for the risk of preterm birth. Environment international. 2014;70:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gynecologists ACoOa Method for estimating due date. Committee Opinion No. 611. Obstet Gynecol. 2014:863–866. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000454932.15177.be. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1985;151(3):333–337. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cantonwine DE, Ferguson KK, Mukherjee B, Chen Y-H, Smith NA, Robinson JN, et al. Utilizing longitudinal measures of fetal growth to create a standard method to assess the impacts of maternal disease and environmental exposure. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146532. submitted. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lewis RC, Meeker JD, Peterson KE, Lee JM, Pace GG, Cantoral A, et al. Predictors of urinary bisphenol A and phthalate metabolite concentrations in Mexican children. Chemosphere. 2013;93(10):2390–2398. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jiang Y, Scott AJ, Wild CJ. Secondary analysis of case-control data. Statistics in medicine. 2006;25(8):1323–1339. doi: 10.1002/sim.2283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pinheiro J, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 31-121. 2015 BD. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hindmarsh PC, Geary MP, Rodeck CH, Kingdom JC, Cole TJ. Intrauterine growth and its relationship to size and shape at birth. Pediatric Research. 2002;52(2):263–268. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200208000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ferguson KK, McElrath TF, Meeker JD. Environmental phthalate exposure and preterm birth. JAMA pediatrics. 2014;168(1):61–68. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Braun JM, Smith KW, Williams PL, Calafat AM, Berry K, Ehrlich S, et al. Variability of urinary phthalate metabolite and bisphenol A concentrations before and during pregnancy. Environmental health perspectives. 2012;120(5):739. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cantonwine DE, Ferguson KK, Mukherjee B, McElrath TF, Meeker JD. Urinary bisphenol A levels during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth. Environmental health perspectives. 2015;123(9):895. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang Y, Lin L, Cao Y, Chen B, Ge R. Maternal Exposure of Phthalates in Low-Birth-Weight Newborns: A Case-Control Study in Shanghai, China. Biology of Reproduction. 2008;78(Suppl 1):198–199. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Calafat AM, Longnecker MP, Koch HM, Swan SH, Hauser R, Goldman LR, et al. Optimal exposure biomarkers for nonpersistent chemicals in environmental epidemiology. Environmental health perspectives. 2015;123(7):A166. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1510041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Johns LE, Cooper GS, Galizia A, Meeker JD. Exposure assessment issues in epidemiology studies of phthalates. Environment international. 2015;85:27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Latini G, De Felice C, Presta G, Del Vecchio A, Paris I, Ruggieri F, et al. In utero exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and duration of human pregnancy. Environmental health perspectives. 2003;111(14):1783. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Suzuki Y, Niwa M, Yoshinaga J, Mizumoto Y, Serizawa S, Shiraishi H. Prenatal exposure to phthalate esters and PAHs and birth outcomes. Environment international. 2010;36(7):699–704. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhao Y, Shi Hj, Xie Cm, Chen J, Laue H, Zhang Yh. Prenatal phthalate exposure, infant growth, and global DNA methylation of human placenta. Environmental and molecular mutagenesis. 2015;56(3):286–292. doi: 10.1002/em.21916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huang Y, Li J, Garcia JM, Lin H, Wang Y, Yan P, et al. Phthalate levels in cord blood are associated with preterm delivery and fetal growth parameters in Chinese women. PloS one. 2014;9(2):e87430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Smarr MM, Grantz KL, Sundaram R, Maisog JM, Kannan K, Louis GMB. Parental urinary biomarkers of preconception exposure to bisphenol A and phthalates in relation to birth outcomes. Environmental Health. 2015;14(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12940-015-0060-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lenters V, Portengen L, Rignell-Hydbom A, Jönsson BA, Lindh CH, Piersma AH, et al. Prenatal Phthalate, Perfluoroalkyl Acid, and Organochlorine Exposures and Term Birth Weight in Three Birth Cohorts: Multi-Pollutant Models Based on Elastic Net Regression. Environmental health perspectives. 2015 doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Snijder CA, Roeleveld N, te Velde E, Steegers EA, Raat H, Hofman A, et al. Occupational exposure to chemicals and fetal growth: the Generation R Study. Human reproduction. 2012;27(3):910–920. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chou W-C, Chen J-L, Lin C-F, Chen Y-C, Shih F-C, Chuang C-Y. Biomonitoring of bisphenol A concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord blood in regard to birth outcomes and adipokine expression: a birth cohort study in Taiwan. Environ Health. 2011;10(94):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Troisi J, Mikelson C, Richards S, Symes S, Adair D, Zullo F, et al. Placental concentrations of bisphenol A and birth weight from births in the Southeastern US. Placenta. 2014;35(11):947–952. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.08.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tang R, Chen M-j, Ding G-d, Chen X-j, Han X-m, Zhou K, et al. Associations of prenatal exposure to phenols with birth outcomes. Environmental Pollution. 2013;178:115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aguilera I, Garcia-Esteban R, Iñiguez C, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Rodríguez À , Paez M, et al. Prenatal exposure to traffic-related air pollution and ultrasound measures of fetal growth in the INMA Sabadell cohort. Environmental health perspectives. 2010;118(5):705–711. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.