Abstract
Background: Homeless and unstably housed women living in an urban setting are at risk for sexually transmitted diseases, yet the seroprevalence and correlates of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) specific to impoverished women are poorly understood.
Materials and Methods: Between April and October 2010, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of sociodemographic, structural, and behavioral factors associated with prevalent HSV-2 infection (recent and historical infections) within a community-recruited cohort of homeless and unstably housed women. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify independent sociobehavioral correlates of HSV-2 infection.
Results: Among 213 women (114 HIV positive and 99 HIV negative), the median age was 49, 48% were African American, and 63% had completed high school. HSV-2 seroprevalence was 88%, and only 17% of infected women were aware of their infection. In adjusted analysis, odds of HSV-2 infection were significantly higher for those reporting at-risk drinking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 7.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.59, 67.91), heterosexual orientation (AOR = 4.56; 95% CI = 1.81, 11.69), and for those who were HIV positive (AOR = 3.64; 95% CI = 1.43, 10.30). Odds of HSV-2 infection decreased as current income increased (AOR for each $500 monthly increase = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.78, 0.997).
Conclusions: There is an extremely high seroprevalence of HSV-2 infection among homeless and unstably housed women, and most are unaware of their HSV-2 status. Screening all unstably housed women for HSV-2 infection, with additional counseling for sexual risk and alcohol use, may lead to the identification of more infections and be a first step in reducing additional disease transmission.
Introduction
The seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type-2 (HSV-2) is 21%–24% among women in the United States (US).1 In contrast to symptomatic HSV-2 infections, which clinically warn of transmission risk, most women become infected during intermittent periods of asymptomatic viral shedding from their sexual partners2 and are unaware of their infection.3,4 Sex without a condom and with an HSV-2 infected partner contributes to the transmission of HSV-2.5 HSV-2 infection increases the risk of acquiring HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and may contribute to disease progression among HIV-infected women.2,6
HSV-2 infection has consistently been associated with social determinants of health, including older age,7 female gender,8,9 African American and Latina race/ethnicity,7,10 a lower level of education,8 and low income.7,10 It is also associated with behaviors related to both social determinants of health and mental health such as sex work,7,11 drug use,7,12 and mental illness.13 While female sex and circumstances surrounding poverty are consistently linked to HSV-2 infection, few studies have evaluated correlates of HSV-2 that are unique to impoverished women, such as housing instability. In addition, few have conducted studies exclusively among impoverished women, which would allow for a more thorough understanding of unique challenges this population faces. As a result of the complexities where biological and unique behavioral factors both influence health, there have been calls for a paradigm shift in epidemiology, which “take into account the causes of disease at multiple levels, reciprocal relations, and interrelation between causes that characterize [the outcome].”14 Housing instability has been described as the result of complex social histories that commonly include mental illness, victimization,15 and substance abuse.16 These factors tie into theoretical frameworks of homelessness and have been shown to have independent associations with HSV-2 infection. As a result of the above, further investigation of unstably housed and homeless women could assist public health officials and healthcare providers in developing targeted screening strategies for HSV-2.
Current guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend HSV-2 screening in people with genital ulcers, HIV-infected persons, and men who have sex with men.17 Additional guidelines developed by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) recommend HSV-2 screening for select people who are at risk for STD/HIV acquisition (i.e., those with a current STD, recent STD, or high-risk behaviors) and motivated to change risk behavior, HIV-infected persons, and those who are in or are considering a partnership with an HSV-2 infected person.18 In this study, we sought to determine the seroprevalence and correlates of HSV-2 infection in a high-risk sample of homeless and unstably housed women to inform current HSV-2 screening guidelines.
Materials and Methods
Between April and October 2010, we conducted a cross-sectional STD study within “Shelter, Health and Drug Outcomes among Women” (SHADOW), a cohort study designed to evaluate health and health services use of homeless and unstably housed women living in San Francisco. Women were recruited from all free meal programs serving over 100 meals per day, homeless shelters, and low-cost single room occupancy hotels selected with probability proportionate to the number of residents. This methodology was based on those originally developed by Burman and Koegel and was used to recruit individuals who reflect the larger population of San Francisco homeless persons.18 Women who were present at these venues on recruitment days were invited to participate in screening activities for potential study participation. Inclusion criteria included biological female sex, age greater than 18, and a history of housing instability (slept in a public place, a shelter, or stayed with other people because she had no other place to sleep [“couch-surfed”] in the past 6 months). HIV testing took place at screening. Antibody to HIV was detected with an HIV type 1/2 enzyme immunoassay (OraSure), and repeatedly, reactive samples were tested with an HIV type 1 Western blot (Quest Diagnostics). HIV-infected women were oversampled on additional recruitment days to ensure statistical power for HIV-specific analyses. Participants underwent a behavioral interview, which was administered using a combination of interviewer-administered questionnaires and Audio Computer Assisted Self-Interview (ACASI) for socially sensitive questions, and phlebotomy to obtain serum samples.
HSV-2 testing and cross-sectional data presented in this study represent results from a single visit. The outcome of interest was HSV-2 infection; testing for HSV-2 antibodies was performed using the HerpeSelect 2 IgG (Quest Diagnostics). Participants were paid $35 for completing the interview and phlebotomy. All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of California, San Francisco.
Independent variables obtained through study interviews were selected based on correlates of sexually transmitted infections and general health found in previous studies of impoverished women. Data were self-reported and referred to the prior 6 months. Variables included age, race/ethnicity, income, sexual orientation (prefers to have sex with men [heterosexual] or women/both [homosexual/bisexual]), incarceration (any jail or prison time),19 sex exchange (for money, drugs, a place to sleep, etc.),20 proportion of time spent sleeping in a homeless shelter, and proportion of time spent sleeping in a public place.20 Substance use variables included at-risk alcohol use (>1 drink/day for women),21 heroin use, and cocaine use. Individuals were also screened for depression, manic episodes, PTSD, and schizophrenia using the computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule-IV, based on DSM-IV criteria.22,23 Vaginal sex without a condom, physical assault, intimate partner violence, and number of sexual partners were assumed to be in the causal pathway between study factors and HSV-2 infection, thus, they were not included as potential correlates to avoid over adjustment. Analyses were considered by HIV status to assess effect modification of other study factors.
One-way frequency tables and measures of central tendency were generated to characterize the sample population. Bivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression with Firth's penalized likelihood correction to handle partial or complete separation due to the small sample size. As recommended by Hosmer and Lemeshow, independent variables with a bivariate p-value of 0.25 or less were included into the initial backwards elimination model for multivariate analysis, and variables were eliminated according to the highest p-value24 to obtain the most parsimonious model. Missing data were minimal (<5%) and listwise deletion was used.
Results
A total of 300 women were enrolled in the SHADOW study population. Interview and HSV-2 testing data existed for 213 participants (114 HIV positive and 99 HIV negative) and were included in the current analysis. There were no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics pertaining to race/ethnicity, age, income, or other variables of interest between the initial study sample and those included in this analysis.
Nearly half (48%) of the study participants were African American and the median age of participants was 49 years. At baseline, the median monthly income was $929 and 18% of participants had slept on the street or in a public place in the prior 6 months. Half of the participants (49%) reported recent cocaine use, 56% screened positive for depression, and 12% screened positive for schizophrenia (Table 1).
Table 1.
Population prevalence, n (%) | |
---|---|
Race | — |
African American | 102 (47.9) |
White | 58 (27.2) |
Mixed | 30 (14.1) |
Other | 23 (10.8) |
Age, median (IQR) | 49 (43–54) |
Monthly income, median (IQR) | 950 (800–1,100) |
% Time slept in public | — |
0 | 175 (82.2) |
1–25 | 30 (14.1) |
26–100 | 8 (3.8) |
% Time slept in a shelter | — |
0 | 186 (87.3) |
1–25 | 16 (7.5) |
26–100 | 11 (5.2) |
Heterosexual orientation | 167 (78.4) |
Exchanged sex (6 months) | 22 (10.3) |
Recent incarceration (6 months) | 23 (10.8) |
At-risk drinking (>1/day) | 47 (22.1) |
Cocaine use (6 months) | 105 (49.3) |
Heroin use (6 months) | 27 (12.7) |
Schizophrenia diagnosisa | 24 (11.7) |
PTSD diagnosisa | 86 (42.6) |
Manic episode diagnosisa | 47 (23.4) |
Depression diagnosisa | 112 (55.9) |
HIVb | 114 (53.5%) |
Diagnosed by the Diagnostic Interview Survey.
By design, half of the population was recruited on the basis of HIV infection.
IQR, interquartile range.
Among the 213 tested participants, 88% were HSV-2 seropositive, of which only 17% had received a prior diagnosis. In unadjusted analysis, HSV-2 infection was significantly associated with at-risk alcohol use, heterosexual orientation, HIV infection, and income status (Table 2). In adjusted analysis, these factors maintained their significant associations. HSV-2 infection was significantly higher among persons reporting at-risk alcohol use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 7.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.59, 67.91), heterosexual orientation (AOR = 4.56, 95% CI = 1.81, 11.69), and HIV infection (AOR = 3.64, 95% CI = 1.43, 10.30). Women reporting higher incomes had lower odds of HSV-2 infection (AOR for each $500 monthly increase = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.78, 0.997). Factors that did not reach levels of significance in this population included race, age, time homeless, sex exchange, incarceration, drug use, and mental health diagnoses (schizophrenia, PTSD, manic episodes, and depression).
Table 2.
Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | AdjustedaOR (95% CI) Final Model | |
---|---|---|
Race | ||
African American | — | |
White | 0.52 (0.21, 1.33) | |
Mixed | 1.29 (0.35, 7.00) | |
Other | 0.66 (0.19, 2.82) | |
Age (per 10 years) | 1.33 (0.83, 2.12) | |
Monthly income (per $500) | 0.91 (0.76, 0.9998) | 0.90 (0.78, 0.997) |
% Time slept in public | ||
0 | — | |
1–25 | 0.54 (0.20, 1.68) | |
26–100 | 0.31 (0.07, 1.76) | |
% Time slept in a shelter | ||
0 | — | |
1–25 | 0.79 (0.22, 4.21) | |
26–100 | 0.96 (0.21, 9.16) | |
Heterosexual orientation | 4.14 (1.75, 9.80) | 4.56 (1.81, 11.69) |
Exchanged sex (6 months) | 1.14 (0.33, 5.95) | |
Recent incarceration (6 months) | 0.55 (0.19, 1.89) | |
At-risk drinking (>1/day) | 5.33 (1.32, 48.64) | 7.04 (1.59, 67.91) |
Cocaine use (6 months) | 1.06 (0.46, 2.43) | |
Heroin use (6 months) | 0.39 (0.15, 1.11) | |
Schizophrenia diagnosisb | 2.10 (.50, 19.47) | |
PTSD diagnosisb | 1.06 (0.44, 2.64) | |
Manic episode diagnosisb | 0.76 (0.30, 2.15) | |
Depression diagnosisb | 0.49 (0.18, 1.24) | |
HIVc | 3.25 (1.38, 8.45) | 3.64 (1.43, 10.30) |
Final model only includes variables significant after adjustment.
Diagnosed by the Diagnostic Interview Survey.
By design, half of the population was recruited on the basis of HIV infection.
Bold values are statistically significant 95% CI, which does not include 1.
CI, confidence interval; HSV-2, herpes simplex virus type 2; OR, odds ratio.
Restricted analysis of HSV-2 infections by HIV status resulted in only minor changes to significant variables, suggesting modest effect modification by HIV status. Among HIV-infected women, the unadjusted odds of HSV-2 infection were lower among persons who were recently incarcerated and used heroin; however, associations did not reach levels of significance after adjusting for sexual orientation (Table 3). In addition, while the unadjusted odds of HSV-2 infection were over 3.5-fold higher for both HIV-infected and uninfected participants who self-reported at-risk drinking, only the estimate for HIV-uninfected individuals was statistically significant.
Table 3.
HIV+ (n = 114) unadjusted OR (95% CI) | HIV+ (n = 114) adjustedaOR (95% CI) Final Model | HIV− (n = 99) unadjusted OR (95% CI) | HIV− (n = 99) adjustedaOR (95% CI) Final Model | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Race | ||||
African American | — | — | — | |
White | 0.32 (0.05, 1.76) | 0.73 (0.24, 2.26) | ||
Mixed | 0.49 (0.06, 5.59) | 1.94 (0.38, 19.52) | ||
Other | 0.31 (0.04, 3.63) | 0.98 (0.22, 5.78) | ||
Age (per 10 years) | 1.54 (0.64, 3.49) | 1.28 (0.72, 2.25) | ||
Monthly income (per $500) | 0.88 (0.66, 0.98) | 0.94 (0.72, 1.36) | ||
% Time slept in public | ||||
0 | — | — | ||
1–25 | 0.22 (0.04, 1.40) | 0.92 (0.27, 3.89) | ||
26–100 | 0.15 (0.02, 1.67) | 0.37 (0.05, 4.25) | ||
% Time slept in a shelter | ||||
0 | — | — | ||
1–25 | 0.19 (0.03, 1.21) | 3.32 (0.36, 440.85) | ||
26–100 | 0.40 (0.03, 56.19) | 1.28 (0.25, 12.68) | ||
Heterosexual orientation | 6.22 (1.40, 30.01) | 6.22 (1.40, 30.01) | 3.21 (1.10, 9.28) | 3.59 (1.17, 11.25) |
Exchanged sex (6 months) | 0.37 (0.07, 3.85) | 2.10 (0.45, 20.17) | ||
Recent incarceration (6 months) | 0.18 (0.04, 0.90) | 1.00 (0.19, 10.08) | ||
At-risk drinking (>1/day) | 4.88 (0.56, 640.85) | 3.89 (0.88, 36.71) | 4.99 (1.05, 49.98) | |
Cocaine use (6 months) | 0.82 (0.18, 3.54) | 1.09 (0.40, 3.05) | ||
Heroin use (6 months) | 0.17 (0.04, 0.83) | 0.58 (0.16, 2.54) | ||
Schizophrenia diagnosisb | 1.47 (0.15, 197.39) | 1.87 (0.40, 18.14) | ||
PTSD diagnosisb | 2.02 (0.36, 20.72) | 0.96 (0.34, 2.73) | ||
Manic episode diagnosisb | 0.24 (0.04, 1.29) | 1.09 (0.33, 4.60) | ||
Depression diagnosisb | 0.34 (0.03, 1.92) | 0.68 (0.21, 2.01) |
Final model only includes variables significant after adjustment.
Diagnosed by the Diagnostic Interview Survey.
Bold values are statistically significant 95% CI, which does not include 1.
Discussion
Compared to infection rates of 21%–24% among women from the general US population, this study found an extremely high seroprevalence (88%) of HSV-2 infection among homeless and unstably housed women. Infection was significantly higher among HIV-infected individuals and the vast majority of all infected individuals (83%) were unaware of their infection before study participation, which is similar to prior studies.3,4 Under current CDC guidelines, being HIV infected or a man who has sex with men are risk factors and reasons to test for HSV-2.17 Recent estimates among all sexually active men who have sex with men living in a large metropolitan area indicate that the seroprevalence of HSV-2 infection is 24.5%.25 Homeless and unstably housed women are not currently included as a high-risk population in national guidelines, yet the seroprevalence of HSV-2 infection is more than three times higher. Data presented in this study indicate that revising current guidelines to include women who experience housing instability in screening strategies would target a population with an especially high seroprevalence of infections.
Because most HSV-2 transmission occurs during asymptomatic viral shedding,2 and because such a high proportion of homeless and unstably housed study participants were seropositive, screening all women who experience housing instability is an approach that could lead to improved health and reductions in disease transmission. Over one-quarter of the participants were of reproductive age, and screening this subpopulation of women has additional relevance since mother-to-child HSV-2 transmission is associated with very high neonatal morbidity and mortality.26 If screened before or during pregnancy, antiviral therapy against HSV-2 infections can reduce vertical transmission and clinical sequela.27 The benefits of treatment of HSV-2 extend to women in general; antiviral therapy has been shown to decrease symptoms related to genital ulcers and reduce the transmission of HSV-2 to uninfected partners, regardless of symptoms and genital ulcers.2,5 In addition, people who know their HSV-2 status can benefit from behavioral interventions (i.e., condoms, counseling, and abstinence), which have an independent role in reducing HSV-2 and/or HIV transmission.5,28
Based on prior research linking social determinants of health to HSV-2 infection, we restricted the population of the study to low-income women with disproportionately high rates of housing instability. Within this high-risk population, results were consistent with national samples that point to female heterosexual orientation as a risk factor for prevalent HSV-2 infection.29,30 They are also similar to prior studies linking alcohol consumption to risky sexual intentions,31 risky sexual behaviors,32–35 HSV-2 infection,9,36 and other STDs,33 an association especially important among HIV-negative individuals in this analysis (Table 2). Thus, in addition to screening for HSV-2 infection among all women experiencing housing instability, additional sexual risk and alcohol counseling may assist in tailoring services and interventions aimed at reducing HSV-2 in impoverished women.
Results should be considered in the context of several potential limitations. First, our study had a small sample size. While using techniques specifically designed to recruit a study sample that reflects the larger population of homeless and unstably housed women in San Francisco minimized the possibility of a biased sample, data were obtained from a single geographical location and may not be representative of homeless women in other areas. However, prior research regarding impoverished adults from different geographic areas has been similar on a variety of social, behavioral, health, and health services-related observations,37–39 increasing the likelihood that results reported in this study may be generalizable to impoverished women in other areas. Second, the study design was also cross-sectional and assessed the previous 6 months, so causation cannot be inferred from the results, especially because HSV-2 was probably acquired before this study. This limitation inherent with cross-sectional data may have also contributed to the lack of significant associations between HSV-2 and other factors, including drug use and sex exchange. While ACASI interviews were used to minimize socially desirable responses, self-reported substance use, sexual orientation, and sexual behaviors may still be affected by social desirability bias and misreporting. In this case, at-risk alcohol consumption and homosexual orientation may have been underreported; however, this would have biased results toward the null. Thus, effects are at least as strong as those reported in this study.
In this study, 88% of participants were seropositive for HSV-2 infection suggesting that homeless and unstably housed women are at disproportionately high risk for negative health outcomes. Pending replication of study results in geographically diverse locations, findings reported in this study suggest that augmenting current guidelines for HSV-2 testing among women by including housing instability and at-risk alcohol use as triggers for HSV-2 testing may be an effective strategy to identify, treat, and reduce HSV-2 infections in this high-risk population.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the SHADOW study participants and the SHADOW study team, including Kara Marson, Alyson Weber, and Kathleen Fitzpatrick. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health R21A179439, DA15605, UL1 RR024131, and UL1TR000004.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
- 1.Xu F, Sternberg MR, Kottiri BJ, et al. . Trends in herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 seroprevalence in the United States. JAMA 2006;296:964–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Celum C, Wald A, Lingappa JR, et al. . Acyclovir and transmission of HIV-1 from persons infected with HIV-1 and HSV-2. N Engl J Med 2010;362:427–439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schillinger JA, McKinney CM, Garg R, et al. . Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 and characteristics associated with undiagnosed infection: New York City, 2004. Sex Transm Dis 2008;35:599–606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.CDC. Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 among persons aged 14–49 years—United States, 2005–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010;59:456–459 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wald A. Herpes simplex virus type 2 transmission: Risk factors and virus shedding. Herpes 2004;11 Suppl 3:130A–137A [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tan DH, Murphy K, Shah P, Walmsley SL. Herpes simplex virus type 2 and HIV disease progression: A systematic review of observational studies. BMC Infect Dis 2013;13:502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Buchacz K, McFarland W, Hernandez M, et al. . Prevalence and correlates of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in a population-based survey of young women in low-income neighborhoods of Northern California. The Young Women's Survey Team. Sex Transm Dis 2000;27:393–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gottlieb SL, Douglas JM, Schmid DS, et al. . Seroprevalence and correlates of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in five sexually transmitted-disease clinics. J Infect Dis 2002;186:1381–1389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sudenga SL, Kempf MC, McGwin G, Wilson CM, Hook EW, Shrestha S. Incidence, prevalence, and epidemiology of herpes simplex virus-2 in HIV-1-positive and HIV-1-negative adolescents. Sex Transm Dis 2012;39:300–305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ameli N, Bacchetti P, Morrow RA, et al. . Herpes simplex virus infection in women in the WIHS: Epidemiology and effect of antiretroviral therapy on clinical manifestations. AIDS 2006;20:1051–1058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cohan DL, Kim A, Ruiz J, et al. . Health indicators among low income women who report a history of sex work: The population based Northern California Young Women's Survey. Sex Transm Infect 2005;81:428–433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Semaan S, Leinhos M, Neumann MS. Public health strategies for prevention and control of HSV-2 in persons who use drugs in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013;131:182–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pratt LA, Xu F, McQuillan GM, Robitz R. The association of depression, risky sexual behaviours and herpes simplex virus type 2 in adults in NHANES, 2005–2008. Sex Transm Infect 2012;88:40–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Galea S, Riddle M, Kaplan GA. Causal thinking and complex system approaches in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:97–106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Girardet RG, Lahoti S, Howard LA, et al. . Epidemiology of sexually transmitted infections in suspected child victims of sexual assault. Pediatrics 2009;124:79–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stein JA, Leslie MB, Nyamathi A. Relative contributions of parent substance use and childhood maltreatment to chronic homelessness, depression, and substance abuse problems among homeless women: Mediating roles of self-esteem and abuse in adulthood. Child Abuse Negl 2002;26:1011–1027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Workowski KA, Berman S, (CDC) CfDCaP. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59:1–110 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guerry S, Allen B, Branagan B, et al. . Guidelines for the use of herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 2 serologies: Recommendations from the California sexually transmitted diseases (STD) controllers Association and the California Department of Health Services (CA DHS), 2003. http://www.cdph.ca.gov/healthinfo/discond/Documents/Herpes-Full-Guide.pdf Accessed May23, 2016
- 19.Weiser SD, Neilands TB, Comfort ML, et al. . Gender-specific correlates of incarceration among marginally housed individuals in San Francisco. Am J Public Health 2009;99:1459–1463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Weiser SD, Dilworth SE, Neilands TB, Cohen J, Bangsberg DR, Riley ED. Gender-specific correlates of sex trade among homeless and marginally housed individuals in San Francisco. J Urban Health 2006;83:736–740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moore AA, Hays RD, Greendale GA, Damesyn M, Reuben DB. Drinking habits among older persons: Findings from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study (1982–84). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47:412–416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zimmerman M, Coryell W. The validity of a self-report questionnaire for diagnosing major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:738–740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed., Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow SL. Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000 [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oster AM, Sternberg M, Nebenzahl S, et al. . Prevalence of HIV, sexually transmitted infections, and viral hepatitis by urbanicity, among men who have sex with men, injection drug users, and heterosexuals in the United States. Sex Transm Dis 2014;41:272–279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.James SH, Kimberlin DW. Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection: Epidemiology and treatment. Clin Perinatol 2015;42:47–59, viii [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. No. 82 June 2007. Management of herpes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:1489–1498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wald A, Langenberg AG, Krantz E, et al. . The relationship between condom use and herpes simplex virus acquisition. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:707–713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tao G. Sexual orientation and related viral sexually transmitted disease rates among US women aged 15 to 44 years. Am J Public Health 2008;98:1007–1009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xu F, Sternberg MR, Markowitz LE. Women who have sex with women in the United States: Prevalence, sexual behavior and prevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection-results from national health and nutrition examination survey 2001–2006. Sex Transm Dis 2010;37:407–413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rehm J, Shield KD, Joharchi N, Shuper PA. Alcohol consumption and the intention to engage in unprotected sex: Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Addiction 2012;107:51–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ghebremichael M, Paintsil E, Larsen U. Alcohol abuse, sexual risk behaviors, and sexually transmitted infections in women in Moshi urban district, northern Tanzania. Sex Transm Dis 2009;36:102–107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li Q, Li X, Stanton B. Alcohol use and sexual risk behaviors and outcomes in China: A literature review. AIDS Behav 2010;14:1227–1236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Davis KC. The influence of alcohol expectancies and intoxication on men's aggressive unprotected sexual intentions. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2010;18:418–428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stappenbeck CA, Norris J, Kiekel PA, et al. . Patterns of alcohol use and expectancies predict sexual risk taking among non-problem drinking women. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2013;74:223–232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rosenberg M, Pettifor A, Van Rie A, et al. . The relationship between alcohol outlets, HIV risk behavior, and HSV-2 infection among South African young women: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0125510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Riley ED, Gandhi M, Hare C, Cohen J, Hwang S. Poverty, unstable housing, and HIV infection among women living in the United States. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2007;4:181–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wenzel SL, Tucker JS, Elliott MN, Hambarsoomians K. Sexual risk among impoverished women: Understanding the role of housing status. AIDS Behav 2007;11:9–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kidder DP, Wolitski RJ, Campsmith ML, Nakamura GV. Health status, health care use, medication use, and medication adherence among homeless and housed people living with HIV/AIDS. Am J Public Health 2007;97:2238–2245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]