Abstract
Objective
To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of transurethral holmium laser cystolithotripsy (HLC) under local anaesthesia using a flexible cystoscope.
Patients and methods
A prospective study was undertaken from January 2013 to June 2015. In all, 37 men with bladder calculi underwent HLC under local anaesthesia, preferably in a lithotomy position using a flexible cystoscope, followed by per urethral Foley catheter placement postoperatively.
Results
The mean (SD; range) patient age was 46.6 (5.6; 32–76) years. All patients were rendered stone-free, regardless of stone size. The mean (SD; range) stone size was 2.1 (1.2; 1.4–4.1) cm and operative time was 35 (6; 26–52) min. The whole procedure was well tolerated and there were no major intraoperative complications. The mean (SD; range) hospital stay was 2.4 (1.5; 1–5) days. After a mean follow-up of 6 months, no recurrent stones, urinary retention or urethral strictures had developed.
Conclusions
Transurethral HLC using a flexible cystoscope under local anaesthesia is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of bladder calculi and can be used as an alternative treatment option.
Abbreviations: HLC, holmium laser cystolithotripsy; KUB, plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; US, ultrasonography
Keywords: Holmium laser, Laser cystolithotripsy, Local anaesthesia, Transurethral
Introduction
Bladder calculi management has developed greatly in recent years. Methods currently available include pneumatic or laser transurethral cystolithotripsy, percutaneous cystolithotripsy, cystolitholapaxy, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), and open surgery.
The holmium laser has revolutionised urinary lithiasis management, with several trials demonstrating its superiority over other methods for stone clearance with dusting and minimal mucosal damage [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].
Generally, transurethral cystolithotripsy is performed under general or spinal anaesthesia. But some patients, especially elderly patients with cardiac and/or pulmonary co-morbidities, are not fit to be administered general or regional anaesthesia. Similarly, patients with spinal deformities, pelvic implants or hip joint pathologies are difficult to position in the lithotomy position, making transurethral procedures difficult. With the above background, the present study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of holmium laser cystolithotripsy (HLC) under local anaesthesia using a flexible cystoscope.
Patients and methods
A prospective study was undertaken from January 2013 to June 2015. In all, 37 men with bladder calculi of various sizes, regardless of aetiology, were included in the study. All patients were counselled about the potential benefits of undergoing transurethral HLC under local anaesthesia, and written consent was obtained.
Elderly patients with prostate enlargement and vesical calculi, who were not fit or refused to undergo TURP, were included, but patients with urethral stricture and those who consented for simultaneous TURP and those with stones of >4 cm were excluded from the study.
Preoperatively, patients were evaluated with history and physical examination, routine laboratory investigations including: complete blood count, urine routine, renal function test, coagulation profile, serology, and urine culture. Radiological investigations included plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder (KUB) and ultrasonography (US). Patients with a UTI were treated with antibiotics and all patients had a sterile urine culture before the procedure.
Patients were placed in the lithotomy position, except for five patients who had pelvic or spine conditions and thus were operated upon in the supine position. Lignocaine 2% gel was used as the local anaesthetic agent, which was instilled and a penile clamp was applied for 10 min. A flexible cystoscope (Richard Wolf) was introduced and stones were visualised and dusted with a 100-W holmium laser (VersaPulse Power Suite, Lumenis), using a 365-μm laser fibre with an energy setting of 0.5–0.8 J at 30–40 Hz. The bladder was regularly emptied by connecting the cystoscope to an aspirator, to prevent excessive bladder distension during the procedure and to clear the stone dust. The flexible cystoscope has a conical irrigation channel; the distal tip is narrowest, measuring 2.5 mm, and becomes broader proximally. Hence, stone dust entering the channel during suction, will never block the lumen. At the end of the procedure, a three-way 18-F Foley catheter was placed and the bladder irrigated to clear the residual fragments.
Stone clearance was assessed by US on the first postoperative day. Complete clearance was defined as absence of any significant stone fragments on US.
Pain intensity was recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (0, no pain; 10, worst possible pain). The catheter was removed after 3–4 h of irrigation. The patients were discharged when they were able to void normally without the catheter. They were followed-up with US and KUB at 6 months.
Results
In all, 37 patients were enroled in the study. The mean (SD; range) patient age was 46.6 (5.6; 32–76) years. The mean (SD; range) stone size was 2.1 (1.2; 1.4–4.1) cm. Six patients had multiple stones and three patients (8.1%) had radiolucent stones. All patients underwent HLC under local anaesthesia and complete stone clearance was achieved in all (100%). Eight patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade of ⩾III. In five patients, where the lithotomy position was difficult due to various conditions of the hip joint and spine, the procedure was done in the supine position.
The mean (SD; range) operative time was 35 (6; 26–52) min. There were no major complications during the surgery and patient’s vital parametres remained within normal ranges. Slight haematuria was seen due to minor mucosal injuries that resolved by irrigation, without any episode of clot retention in any patient. None of the patients received any blood transfusion as a result of the procedure. Three patients had an episode of mild fever that resolved with conservative management.
The Foley catheter was removed after 3–4 h of irrigation. Most of the patients (26, 70.3%) reported passage of stone fragments for the first few voids after removal of the Foley catheter. Postoperative oral analgesics (tramadol 50 mg) were offered, on demand, but rarely required.
All patients tolerated the procedure well with a mean (SD; range) VAS score of 2.8 (1.1; 2–4). None of the patients required an additional dose of analgesia during the procedure. The mean (SD; range) hospital stay was 2.4 (1.5; 1–5) days. Seven patients with benign prostatomegaly needed to be re-catheterised after removing the Foley catheter on the first postoperative day, which was then removed after 72 h of the initiation of α-blockers.
The mean (SD; range) follow-up was 6 (0.3; 5–7) months. During this period, none of the patients had urethral strictures, stone recurrence or retention of urine.
Discussion
Bladder stones constitute ∼5% of all urolithiasis with causes ranging from urinary infection, BOO, a foreign body, to neurogenic bladder [6]. Despite the availability of various treatment methods, such as open cystolithotomy, pneumatic or laser transurethral cystolithotripsy, percutaneous cystolithotripsy, cystolitholapaxy and ESWL, there is no consensus as to which is better.
Open surgery is performed rarely now, being restricted to patients with either a large stone burden or who are undergoing open prostatectomy or diverticulectomy [7]. ESWL results depend upon the stone size and is plagued by incomplete stone fragment evacuation, especially in patients with prostatomegaly [8]. Percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy is safe and effective [9], but is an invasive procedure.
Today, transurethral procedures are most commonly used, as they provide a wide array of tools that can be used to achieve stone clearance, e.g. mechanical stone crushers and instruments delivering electrohydraulic, ultrasonic, pneumatic, and laser energy [1]. Mechanical and pneumatic cystolithotripsy are associated with haematuria, mucosal injuries, and infrequently bladder perforations. Haematuria usually leads to reduced endoscopic vision. The use of the holmium laser has made it possible to fragment the stone into minute dust and has now become the energy source of choice for intracorporeal lithotripsy. Also, there is minimal haematuria and mucosal trauma with laser fragmentation [10].
However, all these procedures need either regional or general anaesthesia, which is sometimes not possible in old and frail patients with cardiac and pulmonary co-morbidities. Also, patients with pelvic implants, hip arthritis or with certain spine conditions are difficult to place in the lithotomy position, which is required for these transurethral procedures.
We preformed transurethral HLC under local anaesthesia using a flexible cystoscope in 37 patients, achieving 100% stone clearance, with minimal discomfort to the patient [mean (SD) VAS score 2.8 (1.1)]. Also, in five patients who found the lithotomy position difficult due to various conditions of the hip joint and spine, the procedure was done in the supine position with equal efficacy and comfort. There were no major intra- or postoperative complications associated with the procedure. The larger stone fragments that remained after laser dusting were easily voided after removal of the Foley catheter.
Our present results are comparable to those reported in other series, in which the technique was performed under local anaesthesia [1], [11]. In the Kara et al. [1] study, the overall success rate was 100% and Uzun et al. [11] achieved a total clearance rate of 89%. The mean pain scores were 2.15 and 1.75, respectively in the two studies.
The HLC procedure can easily be performed on out-patient basis, but our present study was conducted in a teaching hospital, where most patients are covered under various types of government schemes, which do not cover this as day-care procedure, and obtaining approval and other formalities before discharge takes some time, leading to a relatively prolonged hospital stay. This was also one of the reasons that we were not able to comment on the cost efficacy of this procedure in our setting.
A larger randomised trial comparing this procedure to those done under spinal or general anaesthesia is also planned.
Conclusion
HLC under local anaesthesia using a flexible cystoscope is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of vesical calculi, especially in patients with co-morbidities precluding administration of regional or general anaesthesia, or in those who cannot be placed in the lithotomy position for any reason.
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Source of funding
None.
Stones/Endourology
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Arab Association of Urology.
References
- 1.Kara C., Resorlu B., Cicekbilek C., Unsal A. Transurethral cystolithotripsy with holmium laser under local anesthesia in selected patients. Urology. 2009;74:1000–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sofer M., Kaver I., Greenstein A., Bar Yosef Y., Mabjeesh N.J., Chen J. Refinements in treatment of large bladder calculi: simultaneous percutaneous suprapubic and transurethral cystolithotripsy. Urology. 2004;64:651–654. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Teichman J.M., Rogenes V.J., McIver B.J., Harris J.M. Holmium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser cystolithotripsy of large bladder calculi. Urology. 1997;50:44–48. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00201-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Leveillee R.J., Lobik L. Intracorporeal lithotripsy: which modality is best? Curr Opin Urol. 2003;13:249–253. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200305000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grasso M. Experience with the holmium laser as an endoscopic lithotrite. Urology. 1996;48:199–206. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00158-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schwartz B.F., Stoller M.L. The vesical calculus. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27:333–346. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70262-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bhatia V., Biyani C.S. Vesical lithiasis: open surgery versus cystolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy. J Urol. 1994;151:660–662. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35041-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Papatsoris A.G., Varkarakis I., Dellis A., Deliveliotis C. Bladder lithiasis: from open surgery to lithotripsy. Urol Res. 2006;34:163–167. doi: 10.1007/s00240-006-0045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Salah M.A., Holman E., Khan A.M., Toth C. Percutaneous cystolithotomy for pediatric endemic bladder stone: experience with 155 cases from 2 developing countries. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:1628–1631. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Teichman J.M., Rao R.D., Rogenes V.J., Harris J.M. Ureteroscopic management of ureteral calculi: electrohydraulic versus holmium: YAG lithotripsy. J Urol. 1997;158:1357–1361. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64214-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Uzun H., Tomak Y., Zorba O.U., Bostan H., Kalkan M. Transurethral cystolithotripsy with a ureteroscope under local urethral anaesthesia and sedoanalgesia. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63:961–964. [Google Scholar]