ABSTRACT
Microorganisms in the environment do not exist as the often-studied pure cultures but as members of complex microbial communities. Characterizing the interactions within microbial communities is essential to understand their function in both natural and engineered environments. In this study, we investigated how the presence of a nitrite-oxidizing bacterium (NOB) and heterotrophic bacteria affect the growth and proteome of the chemolithoautotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacterium (AOB) Nitrosomonas sp. strain Is79. We investigated Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 in co-culture with Nitrobacter winogradskyi, in co-cultures with selected heterotrophic bacteria, and as a member of the nitrifying enrichment culture G5-7. In batch culture, N. winogradskyi and heterotrophic bacteria had positive effects on the growth of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79. An isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) proteomics approach was used to investigate the effect of N. winogradskyi and the co-cultured heterotrophic bacteria from G5-7 on the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79. In co-culture with N. winogradskyi, several Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 oxidative stress response proteins changed in abundance, with periplasmic proteins increasing and cytoplasmic proteins decreasing in abundance. In the presence of heterotrophic bacteria, the abundance of proteins directly related to the ammonia oxidation pathway increased, while the abundance of proteins related to amino acid synthesis and metabolism decreased. In summary, the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was differentially influenced by the presence of either N. winogradskyi or heterotrophic bacteria. Together, N. winogradskyi and heterotrophic bacteria reduced the oxidative stress for Nitrosomonas sp. Is79, which resulted in more efficient metabolism.
IMPORTANCE Aerobic ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms play an important role in the global nitrogen cycle, converting ammonia to nitrite. In their natural environment, they coexist and interact with nitrite oxidizers, which convert nitrite to nitrate, and with heterotrophic microorganisms. The presence of nitrite oxidizers and heterotrophic bacteria has a positive influence on the growth of the ammonia oxidizers. Here, we present a study investigating the effect of nitrite oxidizers and heterotrophic bacteria on the proteome of a selected ammonia oxidizer in a defined culture to elucidate how these two groups improve the performance of the ammonia oxidizer. The results show that the presence of a nitrite oxidizer and heterotrophic bacteria reduced the stress for the ammonia oxidizer and resulted in more efficient energy generation. This study contributes to our understanding of microbe-microbe interactions, in particular between ammonia oxidizers and their neighboring microbial community.
INTRODUCTION
Nitrification, the oxidation of ammonia (NH3) to nitrate (NO3−) via nitrite (NO2−), is a microbially driven two-step process within the global nitrogen cycle (1, 2). The first step, the oxidation of NH3 to NO2−, is carried out aerobically by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) (3–6). AOB are chemolithoautotrophic bacteria that generate energy through ammonia oxidation and fix carbon through the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle (3). The second step of nitrification is performed by nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB), which generate energy from the oxidation of NO2− to NO3− (7–9). Recently, it has been discovered that members of the phylum Nitrospira are able to perform complete ammonia oxidation (i.e., comammox), oxidizing NH3 via NO2− to NO3− (10, 11).
Betaproteobacterial AOB are comprised of the genera Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira. Within the genus Nitrosomonas, AOB form several clusters that can be distinguished by ecophysiological characteristics, such as affinity for NH4+ and tolerance to increasing salt or NO2− concentrations (1, 6, 12). Nitrosomonas cluster 6a is comprised of AOB adapted to low ammonium (NH4+) concentrations that can be found in a range of environments (13–17). Nitrosomonas sp. strain Is79, a member of Nitrosomonas cluster 6a, was isolated from the freshwater sediment nitrifying enrichment culture G5-7 (18–20).
In the environment, microorganisms do not exist in isolation but live as members of complex communities of interacting microbial species. Within microbial communities, negative interactions such as competition or predation can be detected along with mutually beneficial or synergistic interactions such as cross-feeding, co-metabolism or cell-to-cell communication (21–23). Photo- and chemolithoautotrophic microbes interact with heterotrophic microbes in many different environments (24, 25). For example, macro- and microalgae live with specific heterotrophic microbial subcommunities. The exchange of nutrients, enzymes, and bioactive compounds in these communities results in increased community productivity (24, 25). AOB have been shown to interact positively with NOB and heterotrophic bacteria (26–30). The positive effect of NOB on the growth of AOB is in large part due to the removal of NO2− by NOB, as it inhibits AOB growth (8, 29, 31). In the transcriptome of Nitrosomonas europaea, increases in transcript abundance for electron transport proteins (NADH dehydrogenase complex, ATP synthase complex, and several cytochromes, including cytochrome c552) were identified as possible positive effects of co-cultivation with the NOB Nitrobacter winogradskyi (29). In addition, AOB provide organic carbon in the form of soluble microbial products to co-cultured heterotrophic bacteria (26, 27, 32). The positive growth response of AOB to the presence of heterotrophic bacteria could be due to a variety of compounds that may be secreted by the heterotrophic bacteria, such as organic compounds (33–36), acyl-homoserine lactones (37, 38), or siderophores (28). Studies of AOB-heterotroph interactions have mainly focused on the members, structure, and functionality of the heterotrophic bacterial communities (26, 27). It has not been elucidated how the proteomes of AOB respond to the presence of co-cultured NOB or heterotrophic bacteria.
To our knowledge, only a few studies have been conducted focusing on the transcriptome or proteome of AOB. These studies have mainly utilized Nitrosomonas europaea or Nitrosomonas eutropha, two relatively fast-growing AOB often found in nutrient-rich environments (29, 39–43). The AOB proteome analyses have focused on the effect of variable environmental or physiologic growth conditions, such as starvation (42), heavy-metal contamination (41), biofilm formation (43), and the effect of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) or anoxia (40).
Here, we present a study investigating the effects of N. winogradskyi as well as co-cultured heterotrophic bacteria isolated from the enrichment culture G5-7 on the growth and physiology of the AOB Nitrosomonas sp. Is79. We employed a combination of growth experiments and isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) proteomics to determine how the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 is influenced by the presence of N. winogradskyi and heterotrophic bacteria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cultures and media. (i) Cultures.
We utilized the following cultures derived from the original AOB enrichment culture G5-7 (18, 19): (i) AOB isolate Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 (20), (ii) the AOB enrichment culture G5-7 itself, which contained Nitrosomonas sp. Is79, N. winogradskyi, and co-cultured heterotrophic bacteria, and (iii) heterotrophic bacteria isolated from the enrichment culture G5-7. G5-7 was originally enriched in a chemostat with an initial NH4+ concentration of 0.05 mM using Glyceria maxima rootzone sediment (18). The chemostat culture was transferred to batch culture using an initial NH4+ concentration of 0.25 mM first and 5 mM later. The enrichment culture was transferred every 4 to 6 weeks to fresh medium. Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was isolated from the enrichment culture G5-7 using serial dilution, and the complete genome has been sequenced (20). The NOB N. winogradskyi (ATCC 25391) was also used in the experiments.
(ii) Medium to cultivate AOB and NOB.
The AOB mineral salts (AOB-MS) medium used for AOB growth experiments contained various amounts of (NH4)2SO4, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2·2H2O, 0.2 mM MgSO4·7H2O, and 1 ml · liter−1 trace element solution (44, 45). Batch cultures were buffered with HEPES, which was added in a 4-fold molar ratio to the NH4+ concentration, and the pH was adjusted to 7.8 before autoclaving (44). After autoclaving, sterile KH2PO4 was added to a final concentration of 0.4 mM. N. winogradskyi was cultivated in NOB mineral salts (NOB-MS) medium that contained 14.5 mM NaNO2, 8.6 mM NaCl, 1.1 mM KH2PO4, 0.2 mM MgSO4·7H2O, 0.03 mM CaCO3, and 1 ml · liter−1 trace element solution with a pH of 7.8 (45, 46).
(iii) Media to cultivate the heterotrophic bacteria.
LB medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), R2A medium (47), and spent AOB-MS medium were used to isolate and cultivate heterotrophic bacteria. Spent AOB-MS medium consisted of 25% sterile filtered medium from an outgrown Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 culture, 75% AOB-MS medium, and either 0.01 g/liter Casamino Acids (Difco, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) or 0.01 g/liter yeast extract (Difco). If necessary, medium was solidified with 1.5% Bacto agar (Difco).
(iv) Isolation of heterotrophic bacteria from the enrichment culture G5-7.
Late log phase G5-7 culture was serially diluted with AOB-MS medium without NH4+ and inoculated onto agar plates containing either LB, 0.1× LB, R2A, or spent AOB-MS medium. Individual colonies were selected based on colony morphology, subcultured, and further maintained on R2A agar plates. Colony PCR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were used to identify the isolated colonies.
(v) Contamination tests.
Axenic cultures of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 and N. winogradskyi were inoculated into LB medium (0.1×) and incubated at 27°C for 2 weeks to test for purity. Cultures exhibiting growth of heterotrophic bacteria were discarded.
Kinetic studies. (i) Apparent Michaelis constant.
Batch cultures of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 grown as a pure culture, in co-culture with N. winogradskyi and in the enrichment culture G5-7 were cultivated with continuous stirring and bubbling at 25°C in the dark. Late logarithmic growth phase cells (1 liter) were harvested by centrifugation (20 min, 30,000 × g, 4°C), washed, and resuspended in NH4+-free AOB-MS medium (10 ml). NH4+-free AOB-MS medium (3.6 ml) was mixed with the concentrated cell suspension (0.4 ml). Concentrated NH4+ solution was added to obtain final NH4+ concentrations between 20 and 1,000 μM. NO2−/NO3− production was followed by a NO2−/NO3− biosensor and used to calculate NO2−/NO3− production rates (48). Michaelis-Menten kinetics were applied to calculate the apparent half saturation constant of ammonia oxidation [Km(app)] (49).
Growth experiments. (i) Half-saturation constant of growth (Ks).
The growth rate of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 as a pure culture, in co-culture with N. winogradskyi and in the enrichment culture G5-7 was determined across a range of initial NH4+ concentrations (0.25 to 5 mM). The cultures were inoculated with 10% (vol/vol) of a late logarithmic phase culture, incubated at 25°C in the dark, and shaken at 120 rpm. Samples were taken regularly to determine NH4+, NO2− and NO3− concentrations. Growth rates were determined by calculating the slope of the log-transformed NO2− or NO2−/NO3− concentrations against time, assuming a correlation between NO2−/NO3− production and growth (44, 50). Monod kinetics were applied to determine the half saturation constant of growth (Ks) of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 in the different cultures (49).
(ii) Growth experiments of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 with heterotrophic bacteria and N. winogradskyi.
All growth experiments were conducted in AOB-MS medium with 1 mM NH4+. Cultures were inoculated with 1% (vol/vol) late logarithmic phase Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 and one or more of the following: 0.2% (vol/vol) R2A medium, 0.2% (vol/vol) culture of heterotrophic bacteria cultivated in R2A, or 1% (vol/vol) N. winogradskyi culture. In addition, we used the enrichment culture G5-7. Heterotrophic bacterial cultures were precultured in liquid R2A for 2 days prior to inoculation. All 10 heterotrophic isolates were combined into a mixed culture, which was added to Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 to resemble as well as possible the original G5-7 heterotrophic population. When the cultures had consumed the NH4+, they were transferred to fresh AOB-MS medium (1% vol/vol). This transfer was repeated once more, resulting in three successive growth cycles. Samples were taken regularly during the third growth cycle, stored at −20°C, and later used to determine NO2−/NO3− concentrations. Following the third growth cycle, co-cultures were plated on R2A agar. Colony PCR and sequencing were used to confirm the identity of the heterotrophic bacteria.
(iii) Chemostat setup.
Chemostats with a working volume of 5 liters were assembled and autoclaved with 4.5 liters of unbuffered AOB-MS medium with 5 mM NH4+. Once the temperature was adjusted to 27°C with a temperature blanket, continuous stirring (300 rpm) and bubbling (500 ml · min−1) with 0.2-μm sterile atmospheric air were started. Sterile KH2PO4 was added to a final concentration of 0.4 mM and the pH was adjusted to 7.8 with sterile 3% (wt/vol) NaCO3. Chemostats were incubated in the dark and inoculated with late logarithmic phase batch cultures (0.5 liter) of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79, Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 co-cultured with N. winogradskyi, or the enrichment culture G5-7. Samples (20 ml) were taken at regular intervals, filtered through a polycarbonate filter (0.2 μm, Whatman Nuclepore), and stored at −20°C for chemical analysis. Contamination tests were conducted each time a sample was taken. When the initial NH4+ in the chemostat was consumed, unbuffered AOB-MS medium containing 5 mM NH4+ was added at a dilution rate of approximately 1.25 liter · day−1 (growth rate, 0.25 day−1). Chemostats were run for 12 days, which corresponded to 3 volume changes (equal to 3 generations). Total cell biomass was harvested by centrifugation (20 min, 22,000 × g, 4°C). The cell pellets were washed in phosphate buffer (20 mM KH2PO4, pH 8), centrifuged (20 min, 28,000 × g, 4°C), and stored at −80°C for proteomic analysis.
(iv) Chemical analysis.
Colorimetric assays were used to determine NH4+, NO2−, and NO3− concentrations in cell-free supernatants (44, 51–53).
Molecular analysis. (i) Identification of the heterotrophic isolates.
Cell material of the isolated heterotrophic bacteria was used as the template for 16S rRNA PCR with the eubacterial primers 27F and 1492R (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) and GoTaq Green master mix (Promega, Madison, WI) (54). PCR products were purified using the Wizard SV gel and PCR cleanup system (Promega, Madison, WI) and sequenced with the two different sequencing primers 357F and 518R (see Table S1) (55) using a BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit on an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA analyzer (Life Technology Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at the Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics (CBFG) at Miami University. The sequences were edited in 4Peaks (A. Griekspoor and T. Groothuis, the Netherlands Cancer Institute). The phylogenetic program ARB was used to align the sequences and to determine the closest cultured relatives (56).
(ii) Molecular analysis of the heterotrophic community in the enrichment culture G5-7 using next-generation sequencing (NGS).
The enrichment culture G5-7 (50 ml) was filtered onto a 0.2-μm nucleopore filter (Whatman Nuclepore). DNA was extracted with the FastDNA spin kit for soil (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH) according to the manufacturer's recommendations, with the following modifications. Filters were homogenized using a bead beater (Biospec Products, Bartlett, OK) three times for 30 s at 4,800 rpm. Samples were stored on ice for 10 min between bead-beating steps and centrifuged (15 min, 28,000 × g, 4°C).
Enrichment culture G5-7 DNA was amplified in triplicate with Illumina-compatible indexed primers designed to amplify the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene (515F-806R) (57). Since the sample was part of a larger sequencing project, a 12-base barcode was incorporated in the reverse primers (57, 58). The PCR products were quantified using a Sybr green I double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) assay, and the concentration was measured on a NanoDrop 3300 fluorospectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). All PCR products were mixed in equal ratio and sequenced in a MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at the CBFG at Miami University.
The sequences were processed by the software package MiSeq Reporter into two files: sequences and barcodes. The sequences were split based on the barcodes, quality filtered with a minimum quality score of 25, truncated to 150 bp, and exported as sequence files (fasta) using the software package QIIME (59). The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were picked against the Greengenes database gg_13_8_otus with 97% similarity. Since there might be an increased diversity in pyrosequencing libraries due to sequencing errors, and to focus on the dominant sequences, all OTUs with abundances below 10 were discarded. The taxonomic affiliations of the sequences were determined, and representative sequences of each OTU were aligned to the ARB database to determine the similarity to the isolated heterotrophic bacteria. The analysis of the community focused on the heterotrophic bacteria.
Protein quantification and analysis. (i) Total cell protein extraction.
Wet cell pellets (0.033 to 0.08 g) were suspended in phosphate buffer (500 μl, 20 mM KH2PO4, pH 8.0), combined with 1 g of 0.1-mm zirconia/silica beads and bead beaten three times for 30 s at 4,800 rpm. Samples were stored on ice for 10 min between each round. Samples were centrifuged (20 min, 28,000 × g, 4°C) and the supernatant was stored at −80°C.
(ii) Solubilization and isolation of peptides.
Cell lysates from Nitrosomonas sp. Is79, Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 co-cultured with N. winogradskyi, and the enrichment culture G5-7 were solubilized in Laemmli gel buffer with heating to 110°C for 10 min. Then, 50 μg of each sample (5 samples total) was loaded onto separate lanes of two one-dimensional, 4% to 12% Bis-Tris acrylamide 1.0-mm mini gels, and electrophoresed for 15 min. The gel region containing the proteins (∼1.5 cm by 2.5 cm) was cut from the gel and subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion, and the peptides were recovered as described previously (60).
(iii) iTRAQ labeling.
The Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 sample was used as the control versus each of the treatments. A total of 25 μg of each sample for the two comparative groups was tagged using iTRAQ reagents following the vendor's (Sciex) instructions and as described previously (61). The 116 and 117 reporter tags were used for the isolated peptides of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 co-cultured with N. winogradskyi samples (Run1) and the enrichment culture G5-7 (Run2), while the 115 reporter tag was used for the Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 control sample in both runs. In each case, labeling reagent sufficient to uniformly tag up to 100 μg of digested protein was used, thus ensuring complete labeling of all peptides when using only 25 μg of protein in each labeling reaction. After labeling, samples were mixed in equal quantities for subsequent separation, identification, and quantitative analysis.
(iv) NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS.
Nanoscale LC-electrospray ionization-MS/MS (nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS) analyses were performed on a TripleTOF 5600+ (Sciex, Toronto, ON, Canada) coupled to an Eksigent (Dublin, CA) nanoLC.ultra nanoflow system. Then, 2 μg of total protein from each mixture was loaded and analyzed as described by Huang et al. in 2015 (62), with the following modifications. The time for desalting and concentration was increased to 15 min, and 2,916 cycles of time of flight (TOF) MS scans were performed in 80 min. The data were recorded using Analyst-TF (v.1.6) software.
Data analyses.
Searches from the nanoLC-MS/MS were accomplished using ProteinPilot software (version 4.5, revision 1656) that utilizes a Paragon algorithm (version 4.5.0.0, revision 1654) against a database consisting of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 and N. winogradskyi protein sequences retrieved from the NCBI whole-genome database supplemented with common contaminating proteins (human keratins, porcine trypsin, etc.) for a total of 12,988 proteins searched. ProteinPilot search parameters included iTRAQ tagging of all primary amines as a variable modification, all biological modifications as variable modifications and carboxyamidomethyl cysteine used as a fixed modification as a result of the reduction and alkylation of any disulfide bond with iodoacetamide prior to trypsin digestion. Gel-based identification (ID) was selected as a special factor in the software to account for any modifications associated with proteins that have been exposed to polyacrylamide gels. The precursor mass tolerance was set to quadrupole-tof instrument in the ProteinPilot software. Data normalization across all iTRAQ tag channels was accomplished in the ProteinPilot software using the bias correction function. This function evaluates the relative ratio of the iTRAQ tags across all the peptides identified and normalizes the ratios, such that the collective ratio of the tags used is 1:1:1 (i.e., 115:116:117 tag), prior to calculating relative differences among individual peptides/proteins. The output files from the ProteinPilot database search contained a summary statistics page, the peptide identification tables, protein identification tables, and relative quantitation data from the iTRAQ reporter ions from each peptide. Further statistical analysis was conducted using the ProteinPilot descriptive statistics template (PDST, version 3.005pB) (http://www.absciex.com/Documents/Downloads/Literature/ProteinPilot-Descriptive-Stats-Template-MassSpec-1910211-01.pdf). This analysis includes processing the relative quantitation data among the sample sets and provides statistical probabilities related to the confidence of the protein identification in relationship to an inverse (decoy) protein database, which consisted of hypothetical proteins based on the inverse amino acid primary sequence of all 12,988 proteins in the database. Only those peptides at 99% or greater confidence (<1% false discovery rate) were presented. P values for the quantitative difference between proteins were calculated from the collective reporter ion ratios of all the peptides identified and quantified for a given protein with a minimum of 2 peptide measurements per protein. A significant change in relative protein abundance between the treatment and control was only presented if the abundance of at least 2 peptides of the same protein changed by a factor of at least 1.5 with a P value of <0.01 (see Table 3).
TABLE 3.
Significant changesa in relative abundance to Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 proteins in Is79 + NOBb or as part of the G5-7 enrichment culture compared to growth as pure culturec
gi no. | Locus tag (Nit79A3) | Description | Influence of: |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N. winogradskyi (Rep1/Rep2) | G5-7 (Rep1/Rep2) | Heterotrophic community of G5-7 (Rep1/Rep2)d | |||
Energy generation and nitrogen metabolism | |||||
gi|338804015 | 370 | ATP synthase F1 complex subunit delta | −1.50/−1.73 | − | |
gi|338804016 | 371 | ATP synthase F1 complex subunit alpha | −2.55/−3.20 | −5.35/−5.01 | − |
gi|338804017 | 372 | ATP synthase F1 complex subunit gamma | −1.65/−1.91 | −2.05/−2.17 | − |
gi|338804018 | 373 | ATP synthase F1 complex subunit beta | −2.47/−2.84 | −4.12/−3.98 | − |
gi|338805865 | 2335 | Nitrite reductase, copper-containing (NirK) | +2.40/+3.54 | +4.34/+3.00 | − |
gi|338806391 | 2882 | Hypothetical protein: ORF5 | −1.91/−2.04 | −2.78/−2.64 | − |
gi|338806393 | 2884 | Ammonia monooxygenase, subunit B | +1.99/+1.70 | + | |
gi|338806394 | 2885 | Ammonia monooxygenase, subunit A | +2.04/+1.93 | + | |
gi|338806449 | 2940 | Cytochrome c554 | +7.13/+3.58 | + | |
gi|338806451 | 2942 | Hydroxylamine dehydrogenase | +1.74/(+1.28)e | + | |
gi|338805203 | 1628 | Cytochrome P460 | +2.96/+2.46 | + | |
Oxidative stress response | |||||
gi|338803966 | 317 | Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase/thiol specific antioxidant | (−1.42)/−1.50 | − | |
gi|338804387 | 754 | Di-heme cytochrome c peroxidase | (+1.35)/+1.89 | − | |
gi|338804428 | 795 | Di-heme cytochrome c peroxidase | +1.99/+2.99 | +3.28/+2.32 | − |
gi|338805421 | 1860 | Di-heme cytochrome c peroxidase | +1.55/+1.87 | − | |
gi|338805484 | 1928 | ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit | −1.73/−1.69 | + | |
gi|338805487 | 1931 | 60-kDa chaperonin (GroEL) | (−1.42)/−1.79 | −1.82/−2.15 | − |
gi|338805488 | 1932 | 10-kDa chaperonin (GroES) | −1.59/−1.57 | −1.85/−2.11 | − |
gi|338804827 | 1225 | Thiol peroxidase | −1.75/−1.52 | −2.19/−1.95 | − |
gi|338805541 | 1988 | Manganese/iron superoxide dismutase | −1.74/−1.73 | −2.29/−2.73 | − |
gi|338805570 | 2021 | Cysteine desulfurase, SufS subfamily | (−1.49)/−1.80 | −2.21/−2.18 | − |
gi|338806009 | 2479 | Rubrerythrin | −1.80/−1.51 | −2.00/−2.33 | − |
gi|338806646 | 3150 | Ankyrin | +1.97/+1.75 | − | |
gi|338805517 | 1961 | Sigma E regulatory protein, MucB/RseB | +1.72/+1.85 | + | |
Carbon metabolism | |||||
gi|338804098 | 457 | Phosphoglycerate kinase | −1.64/−1.78 | −3.14/−2.89 | − |
gi|338805124 | 1544 | Glyoxalase/bleomycin resistance protein/dioxygenase | (−1.47)/−1.74 | − | |
gi|338805269 | 1697 | Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase | −1.52/−1.77 | −2.97/−2.98 | − |
gi|338806036 | 2508 | 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase | −2.36/−2.18 | − | |
gi|338806059 | 2533 | Succinate dehydrogenase, flavoprotein subunit | −1.59/−1.48 | − | |
gi|338803769 | 104 | Succinyl-CoA ligase (ADP-forming) subunit beta | −1.66/−1.67 | + | |
gi|338803900 | 235 | Phosphofructokinase | (−1.48)/−1.70 | + | |
gi|338804096 | 455 | Transketolase | −1.57/−1.83 | + | |
gi|338805641 | 2094 | Enolase | (−1.39)/−1.65 | + | |
gi|338806444 | 2935 | Triosephosphate isomerase | −1.61/−1.79 | + | |
gi|338806728 | 3236 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chain | (−1.17)/−1.54 | + | |
gi|338806727 | 3235 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain | (−1.15)/−1.58 | + | |
Nutrient binding | |||||
gi|338804077 | 436 | Hemolysin-type calcium-binding region | +3.29/+2.63 | (+1.43)/+1.91 | − |
gi|338804618 | 997 | Sulfate ABC transporter, periplasmic sulfate-binding protein | +1.50/+1.72 | +2.09/+1.78 | − |
gi|338804785 | 1174 | Extracellular solute-binding protein family 1 | +2.28/+2.17 | +2.22/+1.85 | − |
gi|338806154 | 2629 | OmpA/MotB domain protein | −1.54/−1.51 | −1.64/−1.63 | − |
gi|338807030 | 3552 | Copper resistance protein CopC | +2.10/+1.91 | − | |
Macromolecule degradation | |||||
gi|338805167 | 1591 | Polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase | (−1.32)/−1.64 | −1.52/−1.57 | − |
gi|338805200 | 1625 | RNase T2 | +5.15/+3.58 | +2.93/+2.83 | − |
gi|338805583 | 2034 | Cytosol aminopeptidase | −1.63/−1.57 | − | |
gi|338806285 | 2776 | Lipase class 3 | +2.18/+2.13 | +3.12/+2.53 | − |
gi|338806518 | 3014 | Alpha-glucan phosphorylase | −2.03/−1.79 | + | |
gi|338806969 | 3490 | Peptidase M4 thermolysin | (−1.29)/−1.73 | + | |
Nitrogen assimilation and amino acid synthesis/metabolism | |||||
gi|338804310 | 673 | Aminotransferase class V | −1.69/−2.03 | −2.57/−2.67 | − |
gi|338805895 | 2365 | Glutamine synthetase, type I | (−1.40)/−1.54 | −2.09/−2.21 | − |
gi|338806043 | 2515 | Nitrogen regulatory protein P-II | −2.38/−2.11 | −1.52/−1.52 | − |
gi|338806861 | 3379 | Alanine dehydrogenase/PNT domain protein | (−1.35)/−1.51 | −2.15/−2.01 | − |
gi|338803826 | 161 | Glycine hydroxymethyltransferase | −1.60/−1.69 | + | |
gi|338804474 | 841 | Threonine synthase | −1.65/(−1.48) | + | |
gi|338804826 | 1224 | Glycine dehydrogenase (decarboxylating) subunit 1 | −1.99/−2.26 | + | |
gi|338804828 | 1226 | Glycine dehydrogenase (decarboxylating) subunit 2 | −1.75/−1.93 | + | |
gi|338805276 | 1704 | Glutamate-1-semialdehyde 2,1-aminomutase | −1.50/−1.57 | + | |
gi|338805542 | 1989 | ATP phosphoribosyltransferase | −1.53/(−1.42) | + | |
gi|338806404 | 2895 | 2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate N-succinyltransferase | (−1.10)/−1.55 | + | |
gi|338806806 | 3317 | Glu/Leu/Phe/Val dehydrogenase | −1.52/−1.50 | + | |
Replication, transcription, translation, and nucleotide biosynthesis | |||||
gi|338804081 | 440 | Integration host factor subunit beta | −1.83/(−1.25) | − | |
gi|338804209 | 572 | Dihydroorotase, multifunctional complex type | −1.53/(−1.23) | − | |
gi|338804216 | 579 | PpiC-type peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase | (+1.45)/+1.67 | +1.72/+1.94 | − |
gi|338804452 | 819 | 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 | −1.93/−1.79 | −2.32/−1.86 | − |
gi|338804691 | 1073 | Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase cyclophilin type | +2.34/+1.56 | − | |
gi|338805468 | 1912 | S-adenosylmethionine synthase | (−1.43)/−1.66 | −2.19/−2.42 | − |
gi|338803669 | 2 | DNA polymerase III, beta subunit | −1.62/−1.52 | + | |
gi|338806332 | 2823 | Translation elongation factor Tu | +2.14/+1.63 | + | |
gi|338806665 | 3172 | Single-strand binding protein | −1.67/−1.87 | + | |
Miscellaneous | |||||
gi|338806370 | 2861 | Tetratricopeptide TPR_2 repeat-containing protein | +1.56/(+1.45) | − | |
gi|338804646 | 1025 | Peptidoglycan-binding domain-containing protein | +2.79/+2.73 | + | |
Bacteriophage related | |||||
gi|338804625 | 1004 | Phage tail sheath protein, putative | +2.07/+1.56 | + | |
Hypothetical and unknown function | |||||
gi|338804162 | 524 | Hypothetical protein | +3.26/+2.88 | − | |
gi|338804471 | 838 | Hypothetical protein | +2.57/+3.81 | +3.59/+2.96 | − |
gi|338804597 | 974 | Hypothetical protein | −2.70/−1.67 | (−1.25)/−1.68 | − |
gi|338804892 | 1299 | Hypothetical protein | −1.72/−1.58 | −2.25/−1.91 | − |
gi|338805151 | 1573 | Protein of unknown function | +1.87/+2.02 | − | |
gi|338805427 | 1867 | Hypothetical protein | +1.75/+2.01 | +3.14/+2.13 | − |
gi|338805428 | 1868 | Hypothetical protein | +1.64/+1.70 | +2.17/+1.54 | − |
gi|338805889 | 2359 | Hypothetical protein | +1.85/+2.49 | − | |
gi|338805974 | 2444 | Hypothetical protein | +2.21/+1.84 | +2.10/+1.59 | − |
gi|338806490 | 2984 | Hypothetical protein | +1.57/(+1.44) | − | |
gi|338806603 | 3107 | Hypothetical protein | +1.96/+1.53 | − | |
gi|338806604 | 3108 | Hypothetical protein | +2.26/(+1.38) | − | |
gi|338806650 | 3154 | Hypothetical protein | −1.52/−1.65 | −2.00/−2.54 | − |
gi|338804639 | 1018 | Hypothetical protein | +1.72/+1.61 | + | |
gi|338805185 | 1609 | Hypothetical protein | (−1.49)/−1.89 | + | |
gi|338805805 | 2265 | Hypothetical protein | +1.79/(+1.41) | + | |
gi|338806101 | 2576 | Hypothetical protein | (−1.47)/−1.77 | + | |
gi|338806350 | 2841 | Hypothetical protein | −1.69/−1.79 | + | |
gi|338806966 | 3487 | Hypothetical protein | −2.31/−2.69 | + |
Significance, >1.5-fold positive or negative change; P < 0.01.
Is79 + NOB, Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 proteins when in co-culture with N. winogradskyi.
All co-cultures (N. winogradskyi Reps 1 and 2, and G5-7 Reps 1 and 2) were compared to one control of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79. Positive (+) or negative (−) notations for the N. winogradskyi and G5-7 replicates (Rep1/Rep2) indicate increased or decreased absolute abundance, respectively.
Indirect measurements on the effect of the heterotrophic community are indicated by + or − in the last column (see the text for details).
Relative protein abundance changes reported that are less than a >1.5-fold positive or negative change are shown in parentheses.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]) was conducted with SSPS (version 19).
Accession number(s).
The sequences of the heterotrophic community of the enrichment culture G5-7 determined by NGS were deposited in the NCBI SRA database under BioProject accession no. PRJNA289396. The individual 16S rRNA gene sequences of the isolates were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KT267186 to KT267195.
RESULTS
Phylogenetic analysis of the heterotrophic bacteria in the enrichment culture G5-7.
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the heterotrophic subcommunity of the enrichment culture G5-7 revealed a total of 19 unique OTUs (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Based on reads, the community was comprised of Alphaproteobacteria (70.3%), Gammaproteobacteria (24.4%), Betaproteobacteria (2.5%), and Bacteriodetes (2.8%). Ten unique heterotrophic Proteobacteria were isolated from the enrichment culture G5-7 (Table 1). All 10 isolates were detected in the NGS library and comprised 87.7% of the nonnitrifyer sequences (Table 1; see also Table S2 in the supplemental material).
TABLE 1.
Phylogenetic affiliation and abundance of the cultivated bacterial isolates from enrichment culture G5-7 in the 16S rRNA NGS librarya
Isolate | Closest cultured relative | Similarity (%) | Sequence length (bp) | Abundance (%) in G5-7 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alphaproteobacteria | ||||
Is42 | Afipia broomeae (U87759) | 99.7 | 1,099 | 44.8 |
Is3 | Ancylobacter aquaticus (M62790) | 99.0 | 625 | 8.7 |
Is2 | Afipia genospecies 7 (U87773) | 99.4 | 1,089 | 4.4 (= Is28)b |
Is28 | Mesorhizobium huakii (D12797) | 99.8 | 1,372 | 4.4 (= Is2)b |
Is32 | Caulobacter fusiformis (AJ007803) | 98.5 | 1,082 | 1.3 |
Is17 | Rhizobium radiobacter (M11223) | 96.6 | 1,071 | 1.1 |
Is23 | Sphingomonas adhaesiva (D13722) | 98.8 | 1,100 | 0.5 |
Betaproteobacteria, Is22 | Pandoraea pnomenusa (AF139174) | 99.8 | 1,076 | 2.3 |
Gammaproteobacteria | ||||
Is19 | Pseudomonas putida (AF094743) | 99.6 | 1,137 | 23.9 |
Is39 | Lysobacter antibioticus (AB019582) | 95.7 | 1,091 | 2.3 |
Percent abundance in enrichment culture G5-7 is based on the total reads assigned to OTUs representing heterotrophic bacteria.
Based on the short read length in NGS, Is2 and Is28 cluster together as OTU1 (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).
Ammonia-oxidizing activity and growth characteristics of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79.
Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 exhibited a longer lag phase and a lower rate of NO2− production in pure culture than when grown in co-culture with N. winogradskyi or as part of the enrichment culture G5-7 (Fig. 1). The growth rate of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 significantly increased when co-cultured with N. winogradskyi and increased even more when grown as part of the enrichment culture G5-7 (Table 2). The half saturation constant of growth (Ks) decreased significantly when Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was co-cultured with N. winogradskyi or grown as part of the enrichment culture G5-7 (Table 2). However, the apparent Michaelis constant [Km(app)] of NH4+ consumption remained constant in all three cultures (Table 2).
FIG 1.
Nitrite or nitrite/nitrate production (μM) by Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 (Is79), by Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 co-cultured with N. winogradskyi (Is79 + NOB), and by the enrichment culture G5-7 (mean ± standard deviation; n = 3).
TABLE 2.
Half saturation constant of ammonia-oxidizing activity [Km(app)], growth (Ks), and growth rate at 1 mM ammonium of Is79, Is79 + NOB, and G5-7a
Measure | Culture |
||
---|---|---|---|
Is79 | Is79 + NOB | G5-7 | |
Km(app) (μM NH3)b | 3.32/3.56 | 3.10/3.56 | 3.37/3.53 |
Ks (μM NH3)c | 17.9 ± 3.1 A | 9.4 ± 1.9 B | 8.2 ± 2.9 B |
Growth rate (h−1)c,d | 0.023 ± 0.003 A | 0.037 ± 0.002 B | 0.055 ± 0.002 C |
Is79, Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 in pure culture (Is79); Is79 + NOB, Is79 co-cultured with N. winogradskyi; G5-7, Is79 cultured as part of the enrichment culture G5-7.
Measurement of biological replicates.
Mean ± SD; n = 3. Different capital letters indicate significant differences determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (P < 0.05).
Growth rate calculated based on the nitrite/nitrate production over time (see Fig. 1).
The effect of N. winogradskyi and heterotrophic bacteria on the growth rate of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79.
The growth rate of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was determined in artificially designed co-cultures containing combinations of the isolated heterotrophic bacteria or N. winogradskyi over the course of 3 growth cycles (i.e., 2 culture transfers). The growth rate of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 significantly increased in the presence of N. winogradskyi or heterotrophic isolates (Fig. 2). The growth rate of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 co-cultured with all 10 heterotrophic isolates plus N. winogradskyi was comparable to the growth rate of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 in the enrichment culture G5-7 (Fig. 2). In addition, the growth rate of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 as part of the enrichment culture G5-7 was significantly higher than the growth rate of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 co-cultured with N. winogradskyi or any of the heterotrophic isolates (Fig. 2). The growth of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 in the AOB-MS medium with R2A was not significantly different from its growth in AOB-MS medium (Fig. 2).
FIG 2.
Growth (h−1) of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 in co-culture with different combinations of N. winogradskyi and heterotrophic bacteria isolated from the enrichment culture G5-7 during the third growth cycle (mean ± standard deviation; n = 3). Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was combined with all of the heterotrophic isolates and N. winogradskyi individually in co-cultures and with a mixed culture containing all heterotrophs with and without N. winogradskyi (All isolates and N. winogradskyi + all isolates). Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was also tested as part of the enrichment culture G5-7. R2A medium was added in place of heterotrophic bacteria as a control. Letters indicate significant differences between Nitrosomonas sp. Is79, the enrichment culture G5-7, and each particular treatment determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (P < 0.05).
Chemostat growth.
Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was grown with NH4+ as the sole energy source and growth-limiting substrate as (i) a pure culture, (ii) in co-culture with N. winogradskyi, and (iii) as part of the enrichment culture G5-7 in continuous cultures. Consumption of NH4+ started 2 to 4 days after inoculation, the pumps for media addition and waste removal were started 5 to 10 days after inoculation, and all chemostats were run as continuous cultures for 3 volume changes (12 days) after reaching steady state (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). A temporary accumulation of NO2− was observed in the enrichment culture G5-7 and in the co-culture with N. winogradskyi (see Fig. S1). During steady-state growth, the concentration of the growth-limiting substrate, NH4+, in the chemostats was higher in the pure culture of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 (115.94 μM) than in the co-culture of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 with N. winogradskyi (2.54 to 6.35 μM) or the enrichment culture G5-7 (0.92 to 1.88 μM) (see Table S3).
Proteomics.
SDS-PAGE of whole-cell extracts from the chemostat cultures showed different protein-banding patterns (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). However, direct inferences about the Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 proteome could not be made, because each culture contained a different bacterial community. Isobaric tagging using iTRAQ reagents followed by LC-MS/MS was used to determine the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 in the chemostat cultures. Relative protein abundance ratios were based on the abundance of detected iTRAQ tags for each protein in each sample. The proteomic analysis presented here focused solely on Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 proteins that significantly changed in abundance (positive or negative change by a factor of >1.5; P < 0.01) when co-cultured with N. winogradskyi or as part of the enrichment culture G5-7, relative to the pure culture. A full list of detected proteins, their change in abundance, and their calculated significances can be found in Tables S4 and S5 in the supplemental material. Due to technical problems, only one Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 chemostat culture was analyzed and used for comparison to the biological duplicates of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 co-cultured with N. winogradskyi (Set1) and G5-7 (Set2) chemostat cultures. Since accurate relative quantitation is predicated on uniform labeling of the primary amines with the iTRAQ reagents, the overall iTRAQ label efficiency was captured for all peptides detected in each comparative set. For Set1, 100% of 10,317 peptides terminating in lysine and 95.3% of 16,523 peptides at the amino terminus were labeled with an iTRAQ tag. For Set2, 100% of 9,684 peptides terminating in lysine and 95.6% of 15,318 peptides at the amino terminus were labeled with an iTRAQ tag. Thus, collectively, a labeling efficiency above 95% allows for excellent relative quantitation measurement.
The influence of N. winogradskyi on the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79.
The levels of 55 Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 proteins significantly changed in abundance by a factor of more than 1.5 (P < 0.01) when co-cultured with N. winogradskyi (Table 3; see also Table S4 in the supplemental material). Of these 55 proteins, 42 had an assigned function, while 13 were hypothetical proteins (Table 3; see also Table S4). In total, 24 proteins increased and 31 decreased in abundance. Many of these proteins had cellular functions related to energy generation, oxidative stress response, nutrient-binding, macromolecule degradation, or carbon metabolism (Table 3). The ATP synthase F1 complex proteins (subunits α, β, γ, and δ) significantly decreased in abundance, while the F1 subunit ε and the Fo subunit β also decreased but had P values above 0.01 (Table 3; see also Table S4). Proteins related to the cellular oxidative stress response changed in a site-specific manner. The cytoplasmic proteins superoxide dismutase, rubrerythrin, thiol peroxidase, and two chaperonins decreased in abundance, while several periplasmic di-heme cytochrome peroxidases increased in abundance (Table 3). The abundance of proteins involved in macromolecule degradation also changed in a site-specific manner. The cytoplasmic proteins aminopeptidase A and polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase decreased in abundance, while a periplasmic lipase and RNase increased in abundance (Table 3). Nutrient-binding proteins for sulfate (periplasmic sulfate-binding protein), copper (CopC), and iron (extracellular solute-binding protein family 1) all increased in abundance (Table 3). Proteins related to central carbon metabolism, such as phosphoglycerate kinase, ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase, and the flavoprotein subunit of the succinate dehydrogenase complex, decreased in abundance in the presence of N. winogradskyi (Table 3). Interestingly the relative abundance of the copper-containing nitrite reductase NirK increased when Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was co-cultured with N. winogradskyi (Table 3).
The influence of the G5-7 community on the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79.
Seventy Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 proteins significantly changed in abundance, by a factor of >1.5 (P < 0.01), in the enrichment culture G5-7 relative to their abundance in the pure culture of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 (Table 3; see also Table S5 in the supplemental material). The abundance of 23 proteins increased, and the abundance of 47 decreased; out of these 70 proteins, 55 had an annotated function. Most changes in the Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 proteome observed when Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was co-cultured with N. winogradskyi were also observed in the enrichment culture G5-7. Similar decreases of ATP synthase F1 complex proteins and increases in nutrient-binding proteins were detected. In addition, proteins involved in the cellular oxidative stress response and macromolecule degradation decreased in abundance in the cytoplasm, but increased in the periplasm. In contrast to being co-cultured with only N. winogradskyi, several Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 proteins involved in ammonia oxidation increased in abundance in the enrichment culture G5-7: ammonia monooxygenase subunits A and B, open reading frame 5 (ORF5), hydroxylamine dehydrogenase, cytochrome P460 and cytochrome c554 (Table 3; see also Table S5).
The influence of heterotrophic bacteria on the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79.
The effect of the heterotrophic community in the enrichment culture G5-7 was determined indirectly. If significant changes (positive or negative change by a factor of >1.5; P < 0.01) were observed in the presence of N. winogradskyi and in the enrichment culture G5-7, these changes were assumed to be due to the presence of the NOB N. winogradskyi. Significant changes (positive or negative change by a factor of >1.5; P < 0.01) only detected in the presence of the heterotrophic bacteria (G5-7) were assigned to be the effect of the heterotrophic bacteria (Table 3). One major effect of the presence of the heterotrophic community was the increase of proteins related to the ammonia oxidation pathway. In the presence of the heterotrophic community, the abundance of proteins related to carbon metabolism decreased, i.e., triosephosphate isomerase, enolase, phosphofructokinase, succinyl coenzyme A (succinyl-CoA) ligase subunit β, transketolase and the ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (RuBisCO) large- and small-chain subunits (Table 3). In addition, several proteins involved in amino acid synthesis and metabolism, such as glycine dehydrogenase subunits 1 and 2, threonine synthase, glycine hydroxymethyltransferase, and ATP phosphoribosyltransferase, were less abundant in the presence of heterotrophic bacteria (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
Individually as well as together, N. winogradskyi and the heterotrophic community of the enrichment culture G5-7 positively affected the growth of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 (Fig. 1 and 2 and Table 2; see also Fig. S1 and Table S3 in the supplemental material). When co-cultured with N. winogradskyi or as part of the enrichment culture G5-7, Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 grew at a lower steady-state NH4+ concentration in continuous culture and at a significantly higher growth rate in batch culture (Fig. 1 and 2 and Table 2; see also Fig. S1 and Table S3). We used this collection of cultures to investigate the mechanisms underlying the positive influence of NOB and heterotrophic bacteria on the growth of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79. iTRAQ proteomics was used to determine the effect of N. winogradskyi and the heterotrophic community of G5-7 on the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 when grown in continuous cultures (Table 3; Fig. 3).
FIG 3.
Model of the effect of heterotrophic bacteria (left) and N. winogradskyi (right) on the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79. Select proteins that increased (white) or decreased (gray) in abundance are shown. Proteins with dashed lines are shown for illustrative purposes only and were not significantly differentially regulated. AMO, ammonia monooxygenase; HAO, hydroxylamine dehydrogenase; c554, cytochrome c554; cm552, cytochrome cm552; Q/QH2, ubiquinone-ubiquinol pool; bc1, cytochrome bc1 (complex III); c552, cytochrome c552; HCO (c)aa3, cytochrome (c)aa3; ATP Syn, ATP synthase; NADH DH, NADH dehydrogenase; PMF, proton-motive force; P460, cytochrome P460; GDH1, glycine dehydrogenase subunit 1; GDH2, glycine dehydrogenase subunit 2; ThrS, threonine synthase; GlyT, glycine hydroxymethyltransferase; GroEL, 60-kDa chaperonin; GroES 10-kDa chaperonin; TDST, 2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate N-succinyltransferase; AADH, Glu/Leu/Phe/Val dehydrogenase; PRT, ATP phosphoribosyltransferase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Rr, rubrerythrin; NirK, nitrite reductase; TPX, thiol peroxidase; Ahp, alkyl hydroperoxide reductase; CcP, di-heme cytochrome c peroxidase; Clp, Clp protease subunit; αGP, α-glucan phosphorylase; PNPT, polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase; CA, cytosol aminopeptidase; CopC, copper resistance protein; ESBP, extracellular solute-binding protein family 1; PSBP, sulfate ABC transporter periplasmic binding protein; HCBR, hemolysin-type calcium-binding region; Lipase, lipase class 3; T2, RNase T2.
Effects of N. winogradskyi.
In AOB-NOB co-cultures, NO2− is removed by NOB, resulting in a relief of NO2−-induced toxic effects and stress on AOB (3, 29, 63). Direct comparison of the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 when grown in pure culture and when co-cultured with N. winogradskyi was used to determine possible mechanisms contributing to the positive influence of N. winogradskyi on the growth Nitrosomonas sp. Is79. Site-specific changes of several proteins related to oxidative stress were observed in the presence of N. winogradskyi (Table 3). The abundance of proteins responsible for the neutralization of reactive oxygen species significantly decreased in the cytoplasm and increased in the periplasm, while intracellular chaperonins also decreased (Table 3; Fig. 3). These proteome shifts indicate that the removal of NO2− from the growth environment of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 resulted in a reduction of intracellular oxidative stress for Nitrosomonas sp. Is79. The reduced intracellular stress response very likely freed up energy in the form of proton motor force (PMF), ATP, or NADPH, as Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 would have less intracellular damage to repair. More energy could then be used for biomass production and growth. Oxidative stress relief has been shown to be the underlying mechanism for other microbial autotroph-heterotroph positive interactions, i.e., between the photoautotroph Prochlorococcus and the marine heterotroph Alteromonas sp. (64).
Nitrosomonas sp. Is79, like N. europaea, utilizes PMF to produce both ATP and NADPH (65). NADPH is generated through reverse electron flow, which makes the production of NADPH energetically more expensive for AOB than the production of ATP (65). The abundance of several protein components of the F1-ATP synthase were significantly lower when Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was co-cultured with N. winogradskyi (Table 3; Fig. 3), indicating that Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 reduced ATP production in the presence of N. winogradskyi. This suggests that Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 co-cultured with N. winogradskyi could divert a larger portion of PMF produced by ammonia oxidation toward NADPH production. The increased generation of reducing power at the expense of lower ATP production would favor biosynthetic pathways, such as carbon fixation. This contrasts with a study focusing on the transcriptome of N. europaea in the presence of N. winogradskyi, which found N. europaea ATP synthase subunit transcripts upregulated in co-cultures with N. winogradskyi (29). These differences could be due to AOB exhibiting species-specific responses to NOB, different tolerances to oxidative and nitrosative stress, or dynamic transcriptional, translational, and posttranslational levels of control (40).
The abundance of the nitrite reductase NirK increased when Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was co-cultured with N. winogradskyi (Table 3; Fig. 3). However, nirK in N. europaea has been shown to be induced by NO2− accumulation and downregulated in the presence of N. winogradskyi (29, 63). Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 lacks most of the nitrogen oxide metabolism genetic inventory present in N. europaea, including the rest of the nir operon; therefore, it is possible that NirK plays different roles in Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 and N. europaea (20, 66). During ammonia oxidation, NirK is hypothesized to act as an electron sink and prevent the buildup of the toxic intermediate hydroxylamine in AOB (67, 68). NirK has been shown to be essential for efficient ammonia oxidation in N. europaea, with ammonia oxidation rates decreasing in nirK mutants compared to the rate in the wild type (68). Since the NO2− concentration in the chemostats decreased from 4,653 μM in the absence of N. winogradskyi to below 15 μM when N. winogradskyi was present (see Table S3 in the supplemental material), our results suggest that NirK in Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 might be associated with more efficient ammonia oxidation rather than acting in response to NO2−. Future work is required to decipher the exact and possibly multiple roles of NirK in different AOB.
In summary, the shifts in the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 in the presence of N. winogradskyi were very likely caused by the reduction of the NO2− stress and resulted in a decrease of energy spent in stress response, more energy efficient ammonia oxidation, and a subsequently higher growth rate (Table 2; Fig. 2 and 3). This conclusion is supported by the lower Ks and the higher growth rate of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 when co-cultured with N. winogradskyi in batch culture (Table 2; Fig. 2).
Effects of heterotrophic bacteria.
The heterotrophic community in the enrichment culture G5-7 consists of Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Bacteriodetes (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Members of these phylogenetic groups have previously been found in AOB and cyanobacterial enrichment cultures (26, 27, 69, 70). The addition of heterotrophic isolates as single isolates or together as a community resulted in enhanced growth rates of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 (Fig. 1 and 2). Positive effects of heterotrophic bacteria on the growth and metabolism of autotrophic bacteria have been previously observed in methanotrophic bacteria (71) and cyanobacteria (64, 69, 70, 72). The underlying mechanisms of these interactions appear broad and are often not limited to distinct phylogenetic groups. Heterotrophic bacteria are hypothesized to provide a common cellular metabolite, eliminate toxic compounds, or reduce oxidative stress on autotrophs (70–74).
When Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was grown as part of the enrichment culture G5-7, several proteins directly related to the ammonia oxidation pathway were significantly more abundant relative to their presence in the Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 and N. winogradskyi co-culture (Table 3). Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 relies on ammonia oxidation for energy generation, and a higher abundance of proteins involved in ammonia oxidation could result in more energy production and faster growth (Fig. 3). The increased growth rate and ability of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 in the enrichment culture G5-7 to grow at a lower steady-state NH4+ concentration (Fig. 2; see also Table S3 and Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) support this conclusion.
In addition, 6 proteins related to amino acid synthesis and metabolism significantly decreased in abundance when Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 was grown as part of the enrichment culture G5-7 (Table 3; Fig. 3). This suggests that, when grown in co-culture with other heterotrophic bacteria, Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 might downregulate specific amino acid biosynthetic pathways, because they receive exogenous amino acid(s) or amino acid metabolite(s) from the heterotrophic community (Fig. 3). In support of this idea, certain amino acids have previously been shown to enhance the growth rate of N. europaea (34, 35, 75) and Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 has two annotated amino acid transporters in its genome (20). The positive interaction between Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 and the diverse group of heterotrophic bacteria (Table 1; see also Table S2 in the supplemental material) could therefore involve the exchange of amino acids and/or amino acid metabolites. Amino acid exchange has been shown to facilitate bacterial interactions between Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola (76).
The effect of N. winogradskyi and heterotrophic bacteria combined.
The shifts in the proteome of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 grown as a part of G5-7 are a combination of the effects of both N. winogradskyi and heterotrophic bacteria (Table 3; Fig. 3). The combination of positive interactions in the enrichment culture G5-7 resulted in the lowest Ks (Table 2), the lowest steady-state NH4+ concentration in continuous culture (0.75 to 1.22 μM) (see Table S2 in the supplemental material) and the highest growth rate in batch culture (Fig. 2) of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79. The increased abundance of proteins involved in energy generation and the decreased abundance of ATP synthase proteins provides insight into how interactions with both N. winogradskyi and heterotrophic bacteria had a positive effect on the growth of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 (Fig. 3). In summary, Nitrosomonas sp. Is79 positively interacted with both N. winogradskyi and heterotrophic bacteria individually and in defined mixed cultures, resulting in less stress and more energy for the AOB (Fig. 3). This type of controlled community culture experiment begins to bridge the gap between pure culture physiologic experiments and natural environmental microbial community studies.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Rachael Morgan-Kiss and Andor Kiss for technical support with the NGS and critical reading of the manuscript. The work was supported by start-up funds and Funds from the Committee of Faculty Research at Miami University, by a National Science Foundation grant (DEB-1120443) to A.B., by a grant from the 5th Framework Program of the European Commission (ICON EKW-CT-2000-00054) to N.P.R., and by an NIH shared instrumentation grant (S10 RR027015-01 to K.D.G.).
This article is dedicated to the memory of Gary Janssen (Department of Microbiology, Miami University).
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01171-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kowalchuk G, Stephen J. 2001. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: a model for molecular microbial ecology. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:485–529. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sayavedra-Soto LA, Arp DJ. 2011. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: their biochemistry and molecular biology, p 11–38. In Ward BB, Arp DJ, Klotz MG (ed), Nitrification. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arp D, Sayavedra-Soto L, Hommes N. 2002. Molecular biology and biochemistry of ammonia oxidation by Nitrosomonas europaea. Arch Microbiol 178:250–255. doi: 10.1007/s00203-002-0452-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Könneke M, Bernhard AE, la Torré de JR, Walker CB, Waterbury JB, Stahl DA. 2005. Isolation of an autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon. Nature 437:543–546. doi: 10.1038/nature03911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martens-Habbena W, Berube PM, Urakawa H, la Torré de JR, Stahl DA. 2009. Ammonia oxidation kinetics determine niche separation of nitrifying Archaea and Bacteria. Nature 461:976–979. doi: 10.1038/nature08465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Koops H, Purkhold U, Pommerening-Röser A, Timmermann G, Wagner M. 2006. The lithoautotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, p 778–811. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E (ed), The prokaryotes, vol 5. Proteobacteria: alpha and beta subclasses. Springer, New York, NY. doi: 10.1007/0-387-30745-1_36. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bock E. 1976. Growth of Nitrobacter in presence of organic matter. 2. Chemoorganotrophic growth of Nitrobacter agilis. Arch Microbiol 108:305–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bock E, Wagner M. 2006. Oxidation of inorganic nitrogen compounds as an energy source, p 457–495. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E (ed), The prokaryotes, vol 2. Ecophysiology and biochemistry. Springer, New York, NY. doi: 10.1007/0-387-30742-7_16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chain PSG, Xie G, Starkenburg SR, Scholz MB, Beckloff N, Lo C-C, Davenport KW, Reitenga KG, Daligault HE, Detter JC, Freitas TAK, Gleasner CD, Green LD, Han CS, McMurry KK, Meincke LJ, Shen X, Zeytun A. 2011. Genomics for key players in the N cycle from guinea pigs to the next frontier. Methods Enzymol 496:289–318. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386489-5.00012-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.van Kessel MAHJ, Speth DR, Albertsen M, Nielsen PH, Op den Camp HJM, Kartal B, Jetten MSM, Lücker S. 2015. Complete nitrification by a single microorganism. Nature 528:555–559. doi: 10.1038/nature16459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Daims H, Lebedeva EV, Pjevac P, Han P, Herbold C, Albertsen M, Jehmlich N, Palatinszky M, Vierheilig J, Bulaev A, Kirkegaard RH, Bergen von M, Rattei T, Bendinger B, Nielsen PH, Wagner M. 2015. Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria. Nature 528:504–509. doi: 10.1038/nature16461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Koops H, Pommerening-Röser A. 2001. Distribution and ecophysiology of the nitrifying bacteria emphasizing cultured species. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 37:1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00847.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bollmann A, Laanbroek H. 2002. Influence of oxygen partial pressure and salinity on the community composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in the Schelde estuary. Aquatic Microb Ecol 28:239–247. doi: 10.3354/ame028239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.de Bie M, Speksnijder A, Kowalchuk G, Schuurman T, Zwart G, Stephen J, Diekmann O, Laanbroek HJ. 2001. Shifts in the dominant populations of ammonia-oxidizing beta-subclass Proteobacteria along the eutrophic Schelde estuary. Aquat Microb Ecol 23:225–236. doi: 10.3354/ame023225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Freitag T, Chang L, Prosser J. 2006. Changes in the community structure and activity of betaproteobacterial ammonia-oxidizing sediment bacteria along a freshwater-marine gradient. Environ Microbiol 8:684–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00947.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hayden CJ, Beman JM. 2014. High abundances of potentially active ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea in oligotrophic, high-altitude lakes of the Sierra Nevada, California, USA. PLoS One 9:e111560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Speksnijder A, Kowalchuk G, Roest K, Laanbroek HJ. 1998. Recovery of a Nitrosomonas-like 16S rDNA sequence group from freshwater habitats. Syst Appl Microbiol 21:321–330. doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(98)80040-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bollmann A, Laanbroek HJ. 2001. Continuous culture enrichments of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria at low ammonium concentrations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 37:211–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00868.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bollmann A, Bar-Gilissen M, Laanbroek HJ. 2002. Growth at low ammonium concentrations and starvation response as potential factors involved in niche differentiation among ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4751–4757. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.10.4751-4757.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bollmann A, Sedlacek CJ, Norton J, Laanbroek HJ, Suwa Y, Stein LY, Klotz MG, Arp D, Sayavedra-Soto L, Lu M, Bruce D, Detter C, Tapia R, Han J, Woyke T, Lucas SM, Pitluck S, Pennacchio L, Nolan M, Land ML, Huntemann M, Deshpande S, Han C, Chen A, Kyrpides N, Mavromatis K, Markowitz V, Szeto E, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Pagani I, Pati A, Peters L, Ovchinnikova G, Goodwin LA. 2013. Complete genome sequence of Nitrosomonas sp. Is79, an ammonia oxidizing bacterium adapted to low ammonium concentrations. Stand Genomic Sci 7:469–482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Keller L, Surette MG. 2006. Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:249–258. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Little AEF, Robinson CJ, Peterson SB, Raffa KE, Handelsman J. 2008. Rules of engagement: interspecies interactions that regulate microbial communities. Annu Rev Microbiol 62:375–401. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.030608.101423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Williams P, Winzer K, Chan WC, Cámara M. 2007. Look who's talking: communication and quorum sensing in the bacterial world. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:1119–1134. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Martin M, Portetelle D, Michel G, Vandenbol M. 2014. Microorganisms living on macroalgae: diversity, interactions, and biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:2917–2935. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5557-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Santos CA, Reis A. 2014. Microalgal symbiosis in biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:5839–5846. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5764-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kindaichi T, Ito T, Okabe S. 2004. Ecophysiological interaction between nitrifying bacteria and heterotrophic bacteria in autotrophic nitrifying biofilms as determined by microautoradiography-fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1641–1650. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1641-1650.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Okabe S, Kindaichi T, Ito T. 2005. Fate of C-14-labeled microbial products derived from nitrifying bacteria in autotrophic nitrifying biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3987–3994. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3987-3994.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Keluskar R, Nerurkar A, Desai A. 2013. Mutualism between autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and heterotrophs present in an ammonia-oxidizing colony. Arch Microbiol 195:737–747. doi: 10.1007/s00203-013-0926-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pérez J, Buchanan A, Mellbye B, Ferrell R, Chang JH, Chaplen F, Bottomley PJ, Arp DJ, Sayavedra-Soto LA. 2015. Interactions of Nitrosomonas europaea and Nitrobacter winogradskyi grown in co-culture. Arch Microbiol 197:79–89. doi: 10.1007/s00203-014-1056-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schramm A, Larsen LH, Revsbech NP, Ramsing NB, Amann R, Schleifer KH. 1996. Structure and function of a nitrifying biofilm as determined by in situ hybridization and the use of microelectrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:4641–4647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bae W, Baek S, Chung J, Lee Y. 2001. Optimal operational factors for nitrite accumulation in batch reactors. Biodegradation 12:359–366. doi: 10.1023/A:1014308229656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Noguera DR, Araki N, Rittmann BE. 1994. Soluble microbial products (SMP) in anaerobic chemostats. Biotechnol Bioeng 44:1040–1047. doi: 10.1002/bit.260440904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Clark C, Schmidt E. 1966. Effect of mixed culture on Nitrosomonas europaea simulated by uptake and utilization of pyruvate. J Bacteriol 91:367–373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Clark C, Schmidt E. 1967. Growth response of Nitrosomonas europaea to amino acids. J Bacteriol 93:1302–1308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Clark C, Schmidt E. 1967. Uptake and utilization of ammonia acids by resting cells of Nitrosomonas europaea. J Bacteriol 93:1309–1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pan P, Umbreit WW. 1972. Growth of obligate autotrophic bacteria on glucose in a continuous flowthrough apparatus. J Bacteriol 109:1149–1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Batchelor S, Cooper M, Chhabra S, Glover L, Stewart G, Williams P, Prosser J. 1997. Cell density-regulated recovery of starved biofilm populations of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2281–2286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Burton E, Read H, Pellitteri M, Hickey W. 2005. Identification of acyl-homoserine lactone signal molecules produced by Nitrosomonas europaea strain Schmidt. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4906–4909. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.8.4906-4909.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cho C, Yan T, Liu X, Wu L, Zhou J, Stein L. 2006. Transcriptome of a Nitrosomonas europaea mutant with a disrupted nitrite reductase gene (nirK). Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4450–4454. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02958-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kartal B, Wessels HJCT, van der Biezen E, Francoijs K-J, Jetten MSM, Klotz MG, Stein LY. 2012. Effects of nitrogen dioxide and anoxia on global gene and protein expression in long-term continuous cultures of Nitrosomonas eutropha C91. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4788–4794. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00668-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Park S, Ely RL. 2008. Candidate stress genes of Nitrosomonas europaea for monitoring inhibition of nitrification by heavy metals. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:5475–5482. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00500-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pellitteri-Hahn MC, Halligan BD, Scalf M, Smith L, Hickey WJ. 2011. Quantitative proteomic analysis of the chemolithoautotrophic bacterium Nitrosomonas europaea: comparison of growing and energy-starved cells. J Proteomics 74:411–419. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schmidt I, Steenbakkers P, Op den Camp H, Schmidt K, Jetten M. 2004. Physiologic and proteomic evidence for a role of nitric oxide in biofilm formation by Nitrosomonas europaea and other ammonia oxidizers. J Bacteriol 186:2781–2788. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2781-2788.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bollmann A, French E, Laanbroek HJ. 2011. Isolation, cultivation, and characterization of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea adapted to low ammonium concentrations. Methods Enzymol 486:55–88. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381294-0.00003-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Verhagen F, Laanbroek HJ. 1991. Competition for ammonium between nitrifying and heterotrophic bacteria in dual energy-limited chemostats. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:3255–3263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bock E, Sundermeyer-Klinger H, Stackebrandt E. 1983. New facultative lithoautotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Arch Microbiol 136:281–284. doi: 10.1007/BF00425217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Reasoner D, Geldreich E. 1985. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bollmann A, Schmidt I, Saunders A, Nicolaisen M. 2005. Influence of starvation on potential ammonia-oxidizing activity and amoA mRNA levels of Nitrosospira briensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1276–1282. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.3.1276-1282.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kovarova-Kovar K, Egli T. 1998. Growth kinetics of suspended microbial cells: from single-substrate-controlled growth to mixed-substrate kinetics. Microbiol Mol Biol R 62:646–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Belser L, Schmidt E. 1980. Growth and oxidation-kinetics of 3 genera of ammonia-oxidizing nitrifiers. FEMS Microbiol Lett 7:213–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1980.tb01628.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kandeler E, Gerber H. 1988. Short-term assay of soil urease activity using colorimetric determination of ammonium. Biol Fert Soils 6:68–72. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Keeney DR, Nelson DW. 1982. Nitrogen-inorganic forms, p 643–698. In Page AL. (ed), Methods of soil analysis, part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shand CA, Williams BL, Coutts G. 2008. Determination of N species in soil extracts using microplate techniques. Talanta 74:648–654. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar Buchner A, Lai T, Steppi S, Jobb G, Förster W, Brettske I, Gerber S, Ginhart AW, Gross O, Grumann S, Hermann S, Jost R, König A, Liss T, Lüssmann R, May M, Nonhoff B, Reichel B, Strehlow R, Stamatakis A, Stuckmann N, Vilbig A, Lenke M, Ludwig T, Bode A, Schleifer K-H. 2004. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1363–1371. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R. 2011. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(Suppl 1):S4516–S4522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, Owens SM, Betley J, Fraser L, Bauer M, Gormley N, Gilbert JA, Smith G, Knight R. 2012. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Eismann T, Huber N, Shin T, Kuboki S, Galloway E, Wyder M, Edwards MJ, Greis KD, Shertzer HG, Fisher AB, Lentsch AB. 2009. Peroxiredoxin-6 protects against mitochondrial dysfunction and liver injury during ischemia-reperfusion in mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 296:G266–G274. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90583.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, Williamson B, Parker K, Hattan S, Khainovski N, Pillai S, Dey S, Daniels S, Purkayastha S, Juhasz P, Martin S, Bartlet-Jones M, He F, Jacobson A, Pappin DJ. 2004. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 3:1154–1169. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M400129-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Huang Y, Powers C, Madala SK, Greis KD, Haffey WD, Towbin JA, Purevjav E, Javadov S, Strauss AW, Khuchua Z. 2015. Cardiac metabolic pathways affected in the mouse model of Barth syndrome. PLoS One 10:e0128561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Stein L, Arp D. 1998. Loss of ammonia monooxygenase activity in Nitrosomonas europaea upon exposure to nitrite. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4098–4102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Morris JJ, Johnson ZI, Szul MJ, Keller M, Zinser ER. 2011. Dependence of the cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus on hydrogen peroxide scavenging microbes for growth at the ocean's surface. PLoS One 6:e16805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Whittaker M, Bergmann D, Arciero D, Hooper A. 2000. Electron transfer during the oxidation of ammonia by the chemolithotrophic bacterium Nitrosomonas europaea. Biochim Biophys Acta 1459:346–355. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(00)00171-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chain P, Lamerdin J, Larimer F, Regala W, Lao V, Land M, Hauser L, Hooper A, Klotz M, Norton J, Sayavedra-Soto L, Arciero D, Hommes N, Whittaker M, Arp D. 2003. Complete genome sequence of the ammonia-oxidizing bacterium and obligate chemolithoautotroph Nitrosomonas europaea. J Bacteriol 185:2759–2773. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.9.2759-2773.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Cantera JJL, Stein LY. 2007. Role of nitrite reductase in the ammonia-oxidizing pathway of Nitrosomonas europaea. Arch Microbiol 188:349–354. doi: 10.1007/s00203-007-0255-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kozlowski JA, Price J, Stein LY. 2014. Revision of N2O-producing pathways in the ammonia-oxidizing bacterium Nitrosomonas europaea ATCC 19718. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:4930–4935. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01061-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Cole JK, Hutchison JR, Renslow RS, Kim Y-M, Chrisler WB, Engelmann HE, Dohnalkova AC, Hu D, Metz TO, Fredrickson JK, Lindemann SR. 2014. Phototrophic biofilm assembly in microbial-mat-derived unicyanobacterial consortia: model systems for the study of autotroph-heterotroph interactions. Front Microbiol 5:109. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sher D, Thompson JW, Kashtan N, Croal L, Chisholm SW. 2011. Response of Prochlorococcus ecotypes to co-culture with diverse marine bacteria. ISME J 5:1125–1132. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ho A, De Roy K, Thas O, De Neve J, Hoefman S, Vandamme P, Heylen K, Boon N. 2014. The more, the merrier: heterotroph richness stimulates methanotrophic activity. ISME J 8:1945–1948. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Morris JJ, Kirkegaard R, Szul MJ, Johnson ZI, Zinser ER. 2008. Facilitation of robust growth of Prochlorococcus colonies and dilute liquid cultures by helper heterotrophic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:4530–4534. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02479-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Paerl H, Pinckney J. 1996. A mini-review of microbial consortia: their roles in aquatic production and biogeochemical cycling. Microb Ecol 31:225–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Paerl HW, Pinckney JL, Steppe TF. 2000. Cyanobacterial-bacterial mat consortia: examining the functional unit of microbial survival and growth in extreme environments. Environ Microbiol 2:11–26. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00071.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Frijlink M, Abee T, Laanbroek HJ, DeBoer W, Konings W. 1992. Secondary transport of amino acids in Nitrosomonas europaea. Arch Microbiol 157:389–393. doi: 10.1007/BF00248686. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tan KH, Seers CA, Dashper SG, Mitchell HL, Pyke JS, Meuric V, Slakeski N, Cleal SM, Chambers JL, McConville MJ, Reynolds EC. 2014. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola exhibit metabolic symbioses. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003955. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.