Clinical question
For adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA), what is the diagnostic usefulness of anticyclic citrullinated protein antibodies (anti-CCP)?
Bottom line
With a specificity of about 96% and a positive likelihood ratio of about 14, anti-CCP assists with the diagnosis of RA. It is present in only a quarter to half of patients before or at diagnosis, so a negative result does not rule out RA. It can also predict aggressive joint erosion.
Evidence
A positive anti-CCP result means RA is likely but a negative result does not rule out RA.
Context
A positive anti-CCP result also predicts joint erosion in RA (odds ratio 4.4; 95% CI 3.6 to 5.3).8
Anti-CCP is present in 23% of patients with early stage RA, in about 50% of patients at diagnosis, and in about 53% to 70% of patients 2 years after diagnosis.2
Anti-CCP occurs in 1.5% or less of healthy populations and in 10% or less of those with other rheumatic disease, except palindromic rheumatism, in which the occurrence is similar to RA.2 Values might be higher in those with erosive joint disease.9
- Rheumatoid factor has a similar sensitivity but worse specificity.3 Specificities of anti-CCP and rheumatoid factor are 95% and 85%, respectively.
- -Positive likelihood ratios are 12.5 and 4.9, respectively.
- -A positive anti-CCP result is more reliable than a positive rheumatoid factor result for diagnosing RA.
Diagnostic criteria for RA include joint involvement, acute-phase reactants, and the serology markers anti-CCP and rheumatoid factor.10
Implementation
Some clinical features might be particularly helpful when considering RA. First, confirm a history of joint pain with morning stiffness of longer than 1 hour that improves with activity. Second, demonstrate joint tenderness at the metacarpophalangeal joints on hyperextension or stressing the wrists at full flexion or by squeezing the forefoot. Try it on yourself to see how hard to press—it should not hurt! If these maneuvers are painful, the patient could have RA. Check for anti-CCP—a positive anti-CCP result makes RA very likely but a negative result is of little help. Handouts for newly diagnosed patients are available.11
Tools for Practice articles in Canadian Family Physician (CFP) are adapted from articles published on the Alberta College of Family Physicians (ACFP) website, summarizing medical evidence with a focus on topical issues and practice-modifying information. The ACFP summaries and the series in CFP are coordinated by Dr G. Michael Allan, and the summaries are co-authored by at least 1 practising family physician and are peer reviewed. Feedback is welcome and can be sent to toolsforpractice@cfpc.ca. Archived articles are available on the ACFP website: www.acfp.ca.
Footnotes
The opinions expressed in Tools for Practice articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily mirror the perspective and policy of the Alberta College of Family Physicians.
Competing interests: Dr Shojania has consulted for and has stock options with Augurex.
References
- 1.Riedemann JP, Muñoz S, Kavanaugh A. The use of second generation anti-CCP antibody (anti-CCP2) testing in rheumatoid arthritis—a systematic review. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(5 Suppl 39):S69–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Avouac J, Gossec L, Dougados M. Diagnostic and predictive value of anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(7):845–51. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.051391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nishimura K, Sugiyama D, Kogata Y, Tsuji G, Nakazawa T, Kawano S, et al. Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(11):797–808. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-11-200706050-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Whiting PF, Smidt N, Sterne JA, Harbord R, Burton A, Burke M, et al. Systematic review: accuracy of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(7):456–64. W155–66. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-7-201004060-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schoels M, Bombardier C, Aletaha D. Diagnostic and prognostic value of antibodies and soluble biomarkers in undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2011;87:20–5. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Taylor P, Gartemann J, Hsieh J, Creeden J. A systematic review of serum biomarkers anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and rheumatoid factor as tests for rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmune Dis. 2011;2011:815038. doi: 10.4061/2011/815038. Erratum in: Autoimmune Dis 2012;2012:734069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zintzaras E, Papathanasiou AA, Ziogas DC, Voulgarelis M. The reporting quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CCP antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on diagnostic estimates. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jilani AA, Mackworth-Young CG. The role of citrullinated protein antibodies in predicting erosive disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Rheumatol. 2015;2015:728610. doi: 10.1155/2015/728610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Budhram A, Chu R, Rusta-Sallehy S, Ioannidis G, Denburg JA, Adachi JD, et al. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody as a marker of erosive arthritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lupus. 2014;23(11):1156–63. doi: 10.1177/0961203314540967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO, 3rd, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–81. doi: 10.1002/art.27584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rheumatoid arthritis: a guide for adult patients. Vancouver, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Health, British Columbia Medical Association; 2012. [Google Scholar]