Abstract
Background: Well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) incidence in pediatrics is rising, most being papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The objective of the study was to assess the prevalence of different mutations in pediatric WDTC and correlate the genotype with the clinical phenotype.
Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study. Thyroid tissue blocks from 42 consecutive pediatric WDTC patients who underwent thyroidectomy between 2001 and 2013 were analyzed at Quest Diagnostics for BRAFV600E, RAS mutations (N,K,H), and RET/PTC and PAX8/PPARγ rearrangements, using validated molecular methods. Thyroid carcinomas included PTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC), and follicular variant of PTC (FVPTC).
Results: Thirty-nine samples (29 females) were genotyped. The mean age at diagnosis was 14.7 years (range 7.9–18.4 years), and most were Hispanic (56.4%) or Caucasian (35.9%). The mean follow-up period was 2.9 years. Mutations were noted in 21/39 (53.8%), with both BRAFV600E (n = 9), and RET/PTC (n = 6) detected only in PTC. Mutations were detected in 2/5 FTC (PAX8/PPARγ and NRAS) and 3/6 FVPTC cases (PAX8/PPARγ). Of 28 PTC patients, 57.1% had mutations: 32.1% with BRAFV600E, 21.4% with RET/PTC, and 3.6% with NRAS. Of patients with BRAFV600E, 77.8% were Hispanic and 88.9% were >15 years, while all RET/PTC-positive patients were ≤15 years (p = 0.003). Tumor size, lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis at diagnosis (or soon after 131I ablation) did not vary significantly based on the mutation.
Conclusions: BRAFV600E was the most common mutation, especially in older and Hispanic adolescents. A larger, ethnically diverse pediatric cohort followed long term will enable the genotypic variability, clinical presentation, and response to therapy to be better assessed.
Introduction
Thyroid cancer represents the third most common pediatric solid tumor and the most common endocrine malignancy (1). The incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States has been rising in both adults and pediatric patients. Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, the average age-adjusted annual incidence for thyroid cancer in children 0–20 years old, from 2008 to 2011, was 0.886 per 100,000 persons (2). Pediatric thyroid carcinoma and especially papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) has a more favorable course compared with adults, with a disease-specific mortality of <2% (3). However, at the time of diagnosis, pediatric patients often present with more advanced disease, and they frequently suffer from persistent or recurrent disease due to metastatic lymph nodes or lung metastases (3).
The prevalence of different mutations in adult thyroid cancer has been presented in various reports. The most common genetic alteration is BRAF (29–83%) with an overall prevalence of ∼44% (4–6). The prevalence of RET/PTC rearrangements in adults has been estimated to be ∼35% (7). Point mutations in HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS are less frequent in PTC, with an overall frequency of 10–20% (8), whereas a higher prevalence (40–50%) has been reported in follicular carcinomas (9,10). Finally, PAX8/PPARγ rearrangements are found in 30–40% of follicular adult thyroid carcinoma, and rarely in FVPTC (11).
The prevalence and type of mutations appear to differ between adult and childhood thyroid carcinoma, though pediatric data are still limited (1). Initial reports with relatively small sample sizes have shown a much lower prevalence of BRAF mutations in pediatric populations, ranging from 0% to 24% (12–14). In contrast, two recent reports demonstrated a much higher prevalence of the mutation in pediatric PTC of 34.5% and 71.4% (15,16). Sporadic pediatric thyroid cancer shows a variable prevalence of RET/PTC rearrangements, ranging from 37.5% to 71%, with RET/PTC1 being the predominant mutation (17–19). RAS mutations are uncommon in children and adolescents (20–22). The significance of these genetic mutations in terms of tumor presentation, progression, and response to therapeutic interventions in pediatrics is not clear. Therefore, this study investigated the rate of the common mutations implicated in non-medullary pediatric well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma (WDTC) in patients who underwent surgery at the authors' institution. This is the first pediatric study where all four mutation classes were examined on thyroidectomy-obtained thyroid tissue, and the findings were recently reported as an abstract (23). Correlations between genotype and clinical phenotype were also explored.
Materials and Methods
Patients aged ≤18 years old who underwent thyroid surgery and who were treated at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego (RCHSD) for thyroid cancer were included after Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained. The patients were identified based on ICD9 codes (193, 244.0, 244.1), and review of pathology records. Patients with medullary carcinoma were excluded. Forty-six consecutive children and adolescent patients with WDTC were identified between 2001 and 2013. Tumors of patients with only one tissue block available were not submitted for analysis. A total of 42 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks from the thyroid gland obtained at the time of thyroid surgery were sent to Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute for mutational analysis as a collaborative research study. The protocol was IRB approved to analyze these blocks for commercially available BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS point mutations, as well as RET/PTC and PAX8/PPARγ rearrangements, using validated molecular methods.
Total nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) was extracted from thyroid FFPE specimens using an Agencourt FormaPure FFPE extraction Kit (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN) according to the manufacturer's protocol (24). Molecular testing was performed blinded to the result of cytopathological diagnosis. BRAFV600E and BRAFK601E mutations were detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using allele-specific primers and probes using TaqMan Universal PCR Mix (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). The mixture was pre-amplified for 14 cycles on ABI Veriti with denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec, annealing at 56°C for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 30 sec. The PCR products were then cleaned up with Ampure (Beckman Coulter) and subjected to 40 cycles of PCR amplification on ABI 7900 (Life Technologies) with denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec, annealing at 62°C for 30 sec, and extension at 68°C for 30 sec, and the result was analyzed by SDS software (Life Technologies). Sanger sequencing was performed on the positive cases for BRAFV600E. Six out of 10 samples verified the presence of BRAFV600E mutation, while four of the samples failed to amplify, likely not having enough DNA and/or having fragmented DNA smaller than the target size for Sanger sequencing.
RAS mutations were detected by pyrosequencing targeting codons 12, 13, and 61 of HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS. Extracted DNA was mixed with biotinylated primers and subjected to 45 cycles of PCR amplification (denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 30 sec). After PCR, DNA strands were separated on a PyroMark Q96 vacuum workstation (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Then pyrosequencing was performed using a PyroMark Q96 MD instrument (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
RET/PTC1, RET/PTC3, and PAX8/PPARγ rearrangements were detected by real-time reverse transcription PCR. Extracted RNA was first reverse transcribed into cDNA using Superscript III (Life Technologies), then mixed with sequence-specific primers and probes in TaqMan Universal PCR Mix. The mixture was subjected to 45 cycles of PCR amplification (95°C for 15 sec, then at 60°C for 60 sec) on ABI 7900, and the result was analyzed by SDS software. For PAX8/PPARγ, the cDNA was pre-amplified as described above before qPCR. Three cases (7%) were excluded from the data analysis, all due to RNA quality issue in the samples. Four cases failed to result part of the RAS mutation analysis (HRAS and/or NRAS), but as two had mutations in other genes (one in BRAF, the other a PAX8/PPARγ rearrangement), only the other two that had no mutations in other genes were excluded. The third case excluded failed both RET-PTC and PAX8/PPARγ analysis. In the final genotype-phenotype analysis, patients were included with either one positive mutation or who were genotyped for all cited molecular markers. A total of 39 such cases met the above criteria.
A comprehensive chart review was performed, including patients' demographics, family history, history of external beam or other radiation exposure, and disease characteristics such as histology and tumor size. The staging and the type of metastasis were based on initial surgery and the whole-body scan findings following the initial radioiodine 131I treatment.
Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows v22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used when appropriate to compare the rates of the various mutations with different clinical characteristics (e.g., presence of lymph node metastasis or thyroiditis). The p-value was considered statistically significant when it was <0.05 and as a trend with borderline significance when it was ≥0.05 and <0.10.
Results
Patient characteristics
A total of 39/42 patients were included in the final analysis. The number of thyroid cancer cases seen at RCHSD increased significantly after 2005, with 89.7% of the cases diagnosed with non-medullary thyroid cancer after 2005, which is in accordance with the SEER incidence data for pediatric thyroid cancer (2). Demographic data are shown in Table 1. The mean age at diagnosis was 14.7 ± 2.6 years, with females (mean = 14.9 years) being slightly older than males (mean = 14.1 years; p = 0.235). As in other pediatric series (13,17,25,26), there was a female predominance (74.4%). The majority of the patients were Hispanic (56.4%) of Mexican American descent, and Caucasian (35.9%; Table 1). The histologic cancer types included 28 (71.8%) classic PTC, six (15.4%) FVPTC, and five (12.8%) FTC. The distribution is similar to the reported pediatric WDTC SEER data (25), for rates of PTC (64.5%), FVPTC (24.7%), and FTC (12.5%).
Table 1.
Patient Characteristics
Characteristic | No. (%) |
---|---|
Age at diagnosis (years) | |
Mean (SD), range | 14.7 (2.6), 7.9–18.4 |
Sex | |
Male/female | 10 (25.6)/29 (74.4) |
Ethnicity | |
Caucasian | 14 (35.9) |
Hispanic | 22 (56.4) |
African American | 1 (2.6) |
South Asian | 2 (5.1) |
Histologic subtype | |
PTC | 28 (71.8) |
FVPTC | 6 (15.4) |
FTC | 5 (12.8) |
Tumor size (cm) | |
<2 | 15 (38.5) |
2–4 | 12 (30.8) |
>4 | 12 (30.8) |
Neck dissection | |
Central | 7 (17.9) |
Central and lateral | 13 (33.3) |
Other | 1 (2.6) |
No neck dissection | 18 (46.2) |
Lymph node metastasesa | 21 (53.8) |
Pulmonary metastasesb | 3 (8.1) |
Thyroiditis | 16 (41) |
Lymph node metastasis at the completion of initial treatment.
Pulmonary metastases noted post initial radioiodine 131I course.
PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; FVPTC, follicular variant of PTC; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma.
Two of the patients with PTC had a history of radiation exposure. One was treated with cranial radiation for an anaplastic ependymoma and the other with cranial and spinal radiation for medulloblastoma. The latency period from radiation treatment to diagnosis of thyroid cancer was nine and seven years, respectively. Both patients' molecular testing was negative.
As detailed in Table 1, almost one third of the tumors were 2–4 cm in size, close to 30% were >4 cm, and the rest were <2 cm. Neck dissection was performed in 21/39 (53.8%) patients; seven (33.3%) had central neck dissection, 13 (61.9%) both central and lateral, and one dissection of compartment I (not associated with an ectopic thyroid tissue). Neck dissections were planned if there were clinically and/or radiological positive nodal disease preoperatively, and occasionally neck dissections were performed based on the surgeon's determination of pathologic nodal disease intraoperatively with judicious use of frozen sections. Prophylactic central compartment (level VI) or lateral neck dissections were not routinely performed at this institution. Twenty-one of the patients (53.8%) were found to have pathologically positive nodal metastasis and almost all with PTC (95%). Only one patient with FVPTC had lymph node metastasis at diagnosis, and none of those with FTC (p = 0.002). Radioiodine ablation was administered to 37/39 patients. One subject did not receive radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment after thyroidectomy due to a small tumor (<1 cm) and one was lost to follow-up. All cases were presumed to be RAI avid at the time of their initial therapeutic 131I course, as this is more likely to be the case in pediatric tumors (27). The post 131I treatment whole-body scan revealed uptake indicative of neck lymph metastasis in four patients, all of whom already had positive lymph nodes identified during their initial thyroidectomy. Pulmonary metastases were noted, per available post 131I data, in 2/26 patients with PTC, and in one subject with FVPTC. The findings were confirmed by subsequent computed tomography (CT) in the two PTC cases. The mean initial 131I dose was 130 mCi (range 54–184.2 mCi). Four patients had more than one 131I course due to persistent metastases. The mean follow-up period was 34.4 months.
Thyroiditis was diagnosed in 16/39 (41%) patients based on either pathology or positive thyroid antibodies. Most had thyroglobulin (Tg) antibodies measured together with antithyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) antibodies before their thyroidectomy, and all had documented post-thyroidectomy Tg level and antibody titers. Of the 39 patients, 28 had anti-TPO antibody testing, and 12 (43%) were elevated. Thirteen (81.25%) of those with thyroiditis were diagnosed with PTC, and three (18.75%) with non-PTC (p = 0.27). From the cases with positive mutations, 62.5% of the PTC cases had thyroiditis compared with 20% of the non-PTC cases (p = 0.01). Patients with thyroiditis compared with those without thyroiditis had mutations in 68.7% versus 43.5%, respectively (p = 0.12), and a BRAFV600E mutation was present in both groups. The small number of cases with mutations does not allow us to comment on whether thyroiditis affects the type of mutation noted.
Mutational analysis
Mutations were noted in 21/39 (53.8%) samples. A detailed breakdown of the various mutations is shown in Table 2. Multiple mutations were not identified in any patient. The most prevalent mutation was BRAFV600E, found exclusively in PTC (Fig. 1). No BRAFK601E was noted. A total of six RET/PTC rearrangements were identified, and only in PTC. Three out of six FVPTC were positive for PAX8/PPARγ, which was also found in one FTC. Two NRAS codon 61 mutations (c.181C>A, p.Q61K) were also found, one in FTC and one in PTC.
Table 2.
Distribution of Genetic Mutations/Alterations
RET/PTC | RAS | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mutation | BRAFV600E | 1 | 3 | H codons 12/13 | H codon 61 | K codons 12/13/61 | N codons 12/13 | N codon 61 | PAX8/PPARγ |
Sample | 39 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 37 | 39 | 38 | 38 | 37 |
n | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
M/F | 3/6 | 1/4 | 0/1 | 0/2 | 1/3 | ||||
PTC | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | |||||
FVPTC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||||
FTC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||||
n total (%) | 9 (23.1) | 6 (15.4) | 2 (5.3) | 4 (10.8) |
M, male; F, female.
FIG. 1.
Mutational analysis by histology.
Of the 28 patients with classic PTC, 57.1% (n = 16) had mutations. Mutations were noted in 50% (n = 3/6) of those with FVPTC and in 40% (n = 2/5) of those with FTC, but the numbers in those two cancer types were small. BRAFV600E was the most common mutation in PTC (Fig. 2). It was found in 32.1% of PTC cases, and 77.8% and 22.2% of those cases were Hispanic and Caucasian, respectively (p = 0.10). RET/PTC was found in 21.4% of PTC cases and was evenly distributed, with 33.3% being Hispanic and 33.3% Caucasian. The five patients with a RET/PTC1 rearrangement tended to have smaller tumors, four being <2 cm, and only one >4 cm, but 80% of them had positive lymph nodes.
FIG. 2.
Mutational analysis in PTC.
Approximately 89% of the BRAFV600E mutations were found in adolescents >15 years of age, and 11.1% in ≤15 years old (Fig. 3), while RET/PTC rearrangements were exclusively found in children <15 years old (p = 0.003). Taking into consideration the female predominance in WDTC, no sex differences were noted in the relative rate of BRAFV600E mutations and RET/PTC rearrangements (p = 0.6).
FIG. 3.
Mutational distribution by age in PTC.
There was no statistically significant difference noted in the tumor size, lymph node status, and iodine-avid distant metastasis at the completion of the initial treatment (thyroidectomy and 131I ablation), based on the presence or the type of mutations. Of all the patients found to be positive for a mutation, 66.7% underwent a neck dissection in comparison with 38.9% of those who did not have a mutation (p = 0.113). Alternatively, those who presented with positive lymph nodes at diagnosis were not more likely to have positive mutations detected. Of the PTC cases positive for a mutation, 81.25% presented with lymph node metastasis at diagnosis versus 58.3% of those without a mutation (p = 0.231). Close to 89% (88.9%) of the cases with a BRAFV600E mutation and 83.3% of the cases with a RET/PTC rearrangement had central and/or lateral neck dissection, all with positive lymph nodes. Of the BRAFV600E-positive PTC tumors, 22.2% were >4 cm, and of the cases with a RET/PTC rearrangement, 33% were >4 cm (p = 0.393). There were no iodine-avid distant metastases noted in the PTC cases positive for a mutation, whereas two cases, representing 18.2% of the PTC cases without a mutation, had distant pulmonary metastasis identified at diagnosis. The FVPTC case with pulmonary metastasis was positive for a PAX8/PPARγ rearrangement.
Discussion
The presence of the common mutations and rearrangements reported for adults with WDTC has been described previously in non-medullary pediatric thyroid carcinoma (12–19). However, prior pediatric studies tended to be small, and typically examined only one type of mutation, with recent studies focusing on BRAFV600E (15,16). The current study is the first pediatric study to examine all four mutation types simultaneously on thyroidectomy-obtained thyroid tissue from histologically confirmed WDTC using a commercially available analysis, performed by Quest Diagnostics (23). The recently published pediatric guidelines (28) state that molecular studies on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cannot be recommended in routine clinical practice, as they are not yet validated. Data from this study may help fill some of the knowledge gaps. The currently reported study population is mostly of Hispanic (Mexican American) and Caucasian descent (both groups representing 92.3% of all cases). Due to the lack of long-term follow-up and very small number of recurrences (data not shown), only genotype–phenotype correlations are reported on, with the clinical presentation and course up to six months post-diagnosis. Buryk et al. recently published their experience with mutational analysis of these four genes on FNA material from thyroid nodules from 89 pediatric patients up to the age of 18 years, of whom 24 had thyroid cancer, and only 12 had PTC (29). However, all nodules with mutations were found to be malignant, similar to their earlier conclusions in a pediatric study on patients up to 21 years of age, with molecular data available on 66 FNAs (30).
It was noted that 56.4% of the present pediatric cohort was Hispanic, and 35.9% was Caucasian. This is similar to their relative distribution in the general pediatric population in San Diego County (<18 years old), which is 45.4% versus 34.1%, respectively (31). This is in contrast to SEER data, where the incidence of WDTC was greater in white compared with Hispanic children (2) and may be due to the more varied origins of Hispanic patients nationally, whereas in this San Diego cohort they were all Mexican American. BRAFV600E was the most common mutation in all cases and was exclusively found in PTC cases. It was noted mainly in older adolescents of Hispanic descent, a finding that was not recognized previously, and will require corroboration in future studies that also involve Hispanic subjects. RET/PTC rearrangements in PTC were exclusively found in younger patients (≤15 years old), with a lower prevalence than prior U.S. pediatric studies. It is unclear if puberty has an impact on the type of mutation or whether it is just the age itself. The present finding of a cutoff at 15 years of age affecting the likelihood of being positive for a mutation (Fig. 3), while arbitrary, should be further explored. At the completion of the initial treatment, there was no statistically significant difference between tumor size and lymph node metastases based on the presence or type of the mutation; the number of distant metastasis is too small to draw any conclusions. Distant metastases were primarily identified with post-therapeutic 131I whole-body scans. Other imaging such as CT was not done in all of the patients. The majority of children with pulmonary metastases have micronodular disease that typically demonstrates excellent RAI uptake. Because of this, distant metastases in children are more amenable and responsive to 131I therapy compared with adults. In the present cohort, Tg levels were measured in each patient post treatment, and there was no suspicion for metastases based on those levels.
BRAFV600E is considered to be the most common mutation in adult thyroid carcinoma (4–6,32) and was initially thought to have a much lower prevalence in the pediatric population. In a series of 15 cases of children exposed to radiation (Chernobyl), no BRAFV600E mutations were found in those <15 years of age, whereas 8/33 (24%) cases in the older age group (15–31 years old) harbored this mutation (12); this latter rate does not truly reflect pediatric patients only. In two pediatric series of sporadic PTC published a decade ago, the BRAFV600E mutation prevalence was 0% (13) and 20% (14), respectively. In two more recent reports from the United States, the rates were higher (15,16), perhaps signifying a shift. In the first study, the BRAFV600E mutation was detected in 63% of pediatric PTC and FVPTC cases (n = 27) and 71.4% of classic PTC cases (n = 21) (15). The mean age of the cohort was 18.6 years (range 5.8–21.2 years). The authors did not find any significant correlation between BRAFV600E status and age, though most of their BRAFV600E-positive cases (70.6%) were found in children >15 years of age, similar to the finding reported here. Previous reports speculated that higher rates of BRAF mutations likely reflect an older age distribution (33). Another recent study found BRAFV600E mutations in 36.8% (n = 19) of their overall cohort and in 63.6% (n = 11) of PTC cases (16). The reported median age was 13.6 years (range 2.8–18 years). Of the BRAFV600E-positive cases, 4/7 were found in children >15 years of age. This study had a larger cohort of 39 cases, with 28 of those being classic PTC. A higher prevalence of BRAFV600E mutation was also found compared with the older pediatric reports (13,14). The present study reports 23% of all cases and 32.1% of the PTC cases being positive for BRAFV600E. The method used for the detection of the BRAFV600E mutation was allele-specific real-time PCR, which is considered to be more sensitive than Sanger sequencing. In order to verify the results, the mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing in 6/10 of the BRAFV600E-positive samples. Four of the samples failed to amplify due to technical reasons. In agreement with two recent reports (15,16), the majority of the BRAFV600E-positive cases were found in children >15 years of age. The finding is important, as it has been speculated in the past that the presence of a BRAFV600E mutation might contribute to the different biological behavior of adult versus pediatric PTC. The relationship between this mutation and the clinicopathological outcomes of PTC in adults have been investigated in several studies (4,34–37). There is no consensus regarding the correlation of the disease characteristics and the presence of a BRAF mutation. In the majority of the studies, significant associations have been found between the presence of a BRAF mutation and extrathyroidal invasion, advanced stages, distant metastasis, thyroid recurrence, and loss of RAI avidity in the recurrent thyroid cancer. However, a recent large study of adults with PTC failed to demonstrate the same correlations (37). This might be explained by recent findings from the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, which suggest that BRAFV600E-positive PTC should not be considered a homogeneous group in clinical studies (38).
Fewer studies have addressed the same issue in pediatric thyroid carcinoma, but in none of those was presence of the BRAFV600E mutation associated with more aggressive disease (13,39), or correlated with the extent of the disease at diagnosis or risk factors associated with poor prognosis (15,16). The present study confirms that latter observation, but like the other small pediatric studies, it is not powered to detect a significant association between the presence of BRAFV600E and tumor behavior.
Although the prevalence of RET/PTC rearrangements in thyroid tumor varies in different series, it has been reported to be more frequent in childhood than in adulthood thyroid cancer (18,40). Of the 13 different types of RET/PTC rearrangements described, RET/PTC1 and RET/PTC3 are the most common. RET/PTC1 and in particular RET/PTC3 have been highly associated with radiation-induced PTC (18). None of the RET/PTC cases in the current report had a history of radiation-induced PTC. RET/PTC rearrangements in this cohort were found in 21.4% of the PTC cases, which represents a much lower prevalence than that found in prior pediatric studies, such as a report of an overall frequency of 45.5% in a cohort of 33 American children with sporadic PTC (17). In a recent small pediatric series on FNA material, 3/12 PTC cases had RET/PTC rearrangements (25%) (29). In a report from Italy, 40% of children with PTC, unexposed to radiation, were positive for RET/PTC rearrangements (19). All of the current RET/PTC positive cases were children ≤15 years of age. When Elisei et al. compared the frequency of RET/PTC rearrangements in children and adults within the same country, they did not find any significant difference, and they concluded that age does not predict the presence of RET/PTC rearrangements in PTC, but rather that it is a matter of different ethnic groups (40). The cohort presented here consists predominantly of children of Hispanic descent or Caucasians (Table 1). Both RET/PTC and BRAFV600E were found only in classic PTC (n = 28). A novel finding from this cohort was the high rate of BRAFV600E mutations in those of Hispanic descent (77.8% of cases). This contrast with RET/PTC rearrangements, which were evenly distributed.
The PAX8/PPARγ rearrangement is found in 30–40% of adult FTC, and rarely in FVPTC (11), whereas 3/6 FVPTC cases in the present study were positive for PAX8/PPARγ, and 1/5 cases with FTC was positive for a PAX8/PPARγ rearrangement. A larger series is needed to explore whether these findings are consistent in pediatric WDTC.
In the current study, a NRAS Q61 mutation was found in two (5.1%) cases (one FTC, one PTC). The low mutation frequency for RAS mutations in pediatric PTC (3.6%) is similar to those reported previously (22–24), and the significance of the mutation frequency for RAS mutations in pediatric FTC (20%) needs to be further investigated due to the small sample size in this category of patients.
Thyroiditis was documented in 41% cases, a higher rate than in the general population, where 4.8% of adolescents (12–19 years old) in the United States are reported to have positive anti-TPO antibodies (41). In addition, the finding of thyroiditis being more prevalent in PTC (81.5%) versus non-PTC (18.7%) cases (p = 0.27) may reach significance in a larger cohort. There are mixed data reported on the association of autoimmune thyroiditis and differentiated thyroid cancer. Most studies based on FNA biopsy report no correlation, whereas the studies on thyroidectomy tissue report a positive relationship. In patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis, the average rate of PTC is 1.20% in studies using FNA and 27.56% using tissue from thyroidectomies (42). A recent study based on analysis of thyroidectomy tissue failed to demonstrate an association between anti-TPO antibodies and the diagnosis of thyroid cancer (43). In a study from Italy, 39/365 children with autoimmune thyroiditis had FNA performed for suspicious thyroid nodules, and 11 were found to have a PTC on histology, giving an overall prevalence of 3% (44).
One of the limitations of the study is that it is retrospective. Obtaining consecutive cases helps eliminate some bias. The single-center sample size is small, although larger than previous studies in pediatrics. The mean follow-up period was 2.9 years. Since WDTC is typically a slowly progressive tumor, a longer follow-up is needed for better genotype–phenotype analysis of recurrence. Extracted DNA and RNA from FFPE tissues are known to be fragmented and prone to degradation over time (45). The samples that failed to result were from patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2008 and not necessarily from the oldest samples. Overall, genotyping of RET/PTC and RAS was associated with some technical difficulties in a minority of patients, which did not seem to affect the overall conclusions.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that in a pediatric population of WDTC consisting mostly of Hispanic and Caucasian patients, the frequency of the BRAFV600E mutation is comparable to that found in the adult population, and it is mostly observed in those >15 years old and of Hispanic descent. RET/PTC rearrangements were less prevalent in this cohort compared with prior pediatric studies. More advanced molecular analysis using next-generation sequencing will likely reveal other types of mutations, rearrangements, and fusions that may affect the genotype–phenotype correlations. A larger, multicenter, and ethnically diverse pediatric cohort followed long term is needed to study genotype–phenotype correlations better in thyroid cancer at diagnosis and beyond.
Acknowledgments
This study was presented as an abstract at the 2014 Endocrine Society meeting and the 2014 American Thyroid Association meeting.
Author Disclosure Statement
F.M.H., F.W., M.M., R.E.R., and S.C. are employees of Quest Diagnostics, and some have equity interest in the company. No other conflicts of interest exist. No competing financial interests exist for the remaining authors.
References
- 1.Dinauer CA, Breuer C, Rivkees SA. 2008. Differentiated thyroid cancer in children: diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Oncol 20:59–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database Incidence—SEER 13 Regs Research Data, Nov 2013 Sub (1973–2011) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment>—Linked To County Attributes—Total U.S., 1969–2012 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2014, based on the November 2013. submission [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hay ID, Gonzalez-Losada T, Reinalda MS, Honetschlager JA, Richards ML, Thompson GB. 2010. Long-term outcome in 215 children and adolescents with papillary thyroid cancer treated during 1940 through 2008. World J Surg 34:1192–1202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Xing M. 2005. BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 12:245–262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kimura ET, Nikiforova MN, Zhu Z, Knauf JA, Nikiforov YE, Fagin JA. 2003. High prevalence of BRAF mutations in thyroid cancer: genetic evidence for constitutive activation of the RET/PTC-RAS-BRAF signaling pathway in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 63:1454–1457 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cohen Y, Xing M, Mambo E, Guo Z, Wu G, Trink B, Beller U, Westra WH, Ladenson PW, Sidransky D. 2003. BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:625–627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nikiforov YE. 2002. RET/PTC rearrangement in thyroid tumors. Endocr Pathol 13:3–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Namba H, Rubin SA, Fagin JA. 1990. Point mutations of ras oncogenes are an early event in thyroid tumorigenesis. Mol Endocrinol 4:1474–1479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Esapa CT, Johnson SJ, Kendall‐Taylor P, Lennard TW, Harris PE. 1999. Prevalence of RAS mutations in thyroid neoplasia. Clin Endocrinol 50:529–535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nikiforov YE, Nikiforova MN. 2011. Molecular genetics and diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol 7:569–580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nikiforova MN, Lynch RA, Biddinger PW, Alexander EK, Dorn GW, Tallini G, Kroll TG, Nikiforov YE. 2003. RAS point mutations and PAX8-PPARγ rearrangement in thyroid tumors: evidence for distinct molecular pathways in thyroid follicular carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:2318–2326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kumagai A, Namba H, Saenko VA, Ashizawa K, Ohtsuru A, Ito M, Ishikawa N, Sugino K, Ito K, Jeremiah S. 2004. Low frequency of BRAF T1796A mutations in childhood thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:4280–4284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Penko K, Livezey J, Fenton C, Patel A, Nicholson D, Flora M, Oakley K, Tuttle RM, Francis G. 2005. BRAF mutations are uncommon in papillary thyroid cancer of young patients. Thyroid 15:320–325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rosenbaum E, Hosler G, Zahurak M, Cohen Y, Sidransky D, Westra WH. 2005. Mutational activation of BRAF is not a major event in sporadic childhood papillary thyroid carcinoma. Mod Pathol 18:898–902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Henke LE, Perkins SM, Pfeifer JD, Ma C, Chen Y, DeWees T, Grigsby PW. 2014. BRAF V600E mutational status in pediatric thyroid cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61:1168–1172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Givens DJ, Buchmann LO, Agarwal AM, Grimmer JF, Hunt JP. 2014. BRAF V600E does not predict aggressive features of pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma. Laryngoscope 124:E389–E393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fenton CL, Lukes Y, Nicholson D, Dinauer CA, Francis GL, Tuttle RM. 2000. The RET/PTC Mutations are common in sporadic papillary thyroid carcinoma of children and young adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1170–1175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nikiforov YE, Rowland JM, Bove KE, Monforte-Munoz H, Fagin JA. 1997. Distinct pattern of ret oncogene rearrangements in morphological variants of radiation-induced and sporadic thyroid papillary carcinomas in children. Cancer Res 57:1690–1694 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bongarzone I, Fugazzola L, Vigneri P, Mariani L, Mondellini P, Pacini F, Basolo F, Pinchera A, Pilotti S, Pierotti M. 1996. Age-related activation of the tyrosine kinase receptor protooncogenes RET and NTRK1 in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:2006–2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fenton C, Anderson J, Lukes Y, Dinauer CW, Tuttle R, Francis G. 1999. RAS mutations are uncommon in sporadic thyroid cancer in children and young adults. J Endocrinol Investig 22:781–789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nikiforov YE, Nikiforova MN, Gnepp DR, Fagin JA. 1996. Prevalence of mutations of RAS and p53 in benign and malignant thyroid tumors from children exposed to radiation after the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Oncogene 13:687–693 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Suchy B, Waldmann V, Klugbauer S, Rabes H. 1998. Absence of RAS and p53 mutations in thyroid carcinomas of children after Chernobyl in contrast to adult thyroid tumours. Br J Cancer 77:952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nikita M, Jiang W, Newburry R, Phillips S, Reitz R, Waldman F, Hantash F, Newfield R. 2014. Genetic variability in 43 pediatric thyroid cancer cases and correlation with their clinical presentation up to 6 months post-diagnosis. Thyroid 24:A25–26 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cheng S-M, Qu K, Abdool A, Sferruzza A, Waldman F, Reitz RE. 2012. A molecular diagnostic panel for thyroid cancer disease management. J Clin Oncol 30:(suppl; abstr 5510) [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hogan AR, Zhuge Y, Perez EA, Koniaris LG, Lew JI, Sola JE. 2009. Pediatric thyroid carcinoma: incidence and outcomes in 1753 patients. J Surg Res 156:167–172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Scholz S, Smith JR, Chaignaud B, Shamberger RC, Huang SA. 2011. Thyroid surgery at Children's Hospital Boston: a 35-year single-institution experience. J Pediatr Surg 46:437–442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jarząb B, Handkiewicz-Junak D, Włoch J. 2005. Juvenile differentiated thyroid carcinoma and the role of radioiodine in its treatment: a qualitative review. Endocr Relat Cancer 12:773–803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Francis G, Waguespack SG, Bauer AJ, Angelos P, Benvenga S, Cerutti J, Dinauer CA, Hamilton JK, Hay ID, Luster M; The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Pediatric Thyroid Cancer 2015. Management guidelines for children with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 25:716–759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Buryk MA, Simons JP, Picarsic JL, Monaco SE, Ozolek JA, Joyce J, Gurtunca N, Nikiforov YE, Witchel SF. 2015. Can malignant thyroid nodules be distinguished from benign thyroid nodules in children and adolescents by clinical characteristics? A review of 89 pediatric patients with thyroid nodules. Thyroid 25:392–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Monaco SE, Pantanowitz L, Khalbuss WE, Benkovich VA, Ozolek J, Nikiforova MN, Simons JP, Nikiforov YE. 2012. Cytomorphological and molecular genetic findings in pediatric thyroid fine‐needle aspiration. Cancer Cytopathol 120:342–350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bureau USC Children Characteristics, San Diego, California 2008–2012. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_12_5YR_S0901&prodType=table
- 32.Jung CK, Little MP, Lubin JH, Brenner AV, Wells SA, Sigurdson AJ, Nikiforov YE. 2013. The increase in thyroid cancer incidence during the last four decades is accompanied by a high frequency of BRAF mutations and a sharp increase in RAS mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:E276–E285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yamashita S, Saenko V. 2007. Mechanisms of disease: molecular genetics of childhood thyroid cancers. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 3:422–429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Namba H, Nakashima M, Hayashi T, Hayashida N, Maeda S, Rogounovitch TI, Ohtsuru A, Saenko VA, Kanematsu T, Yamashita S. 2003. Clinical implication of hot spot BRAF mutation, V599E, in papillary thyroid cancers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:4393–4397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nikiforova MN, Kimura ET, Gandhi M, Biddinger PW, Knauf JA, Basolo F, Zhu Z, Giannini R, Salvatore G, Fusco A. 2003. BRAF mutations in thyroid tumors are restricted to papillary carcinomas and anaplastic or poorly differentiated carcinomas arising from papillary carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:5399–5404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim KH, Kang DW, Kim SH, Seong IO, Kang DY. 2004. Mutations of the BRAF gene in papillary thyroid carcinoma in a Korean population. Yonsei Med J 45:818–821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gouveia C, Can NT, Bostrom A, Grenert JP, van Zante A, Orloff LA. 2013. Lack of association of BRAF mutation with negative prognostic indicators in papillary thyroid carcinoma: the University of California, San Francisco, experience. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:1164–1170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Network CGAR 2014. Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell 159:676–690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sassolas G, Hafdi-Nejjari Z, Ferraro A, Decaussin-Petrucci M, Rousset B, Borson-Chazot F, Borbone E, Berger N, Fusco A. 2012. Oncogenic alterations in papillary thyroid cancers of young patients. Thyroid 22:17–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Elisei R, Romei C, Vorontsova T, Cosci B, Veremeychik V, Kuchinskaya E, Basolo F, Demidchik EP, Miccoli P, Pinchera A. 2001. RET/PTC rearrangements in thyroid nodules studies in irradiated and not irradiated, malignant and benign thyroid lesions in children and adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3211–3216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hollowell JG, Staehling NW, Flanders WD, Hannon WH, Gunter EW, Spencer CA, Braverman LE. 2002. Serum TSH, T4, and thyroid antibodies in the United States population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:489–499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jankovic B, Le KT, Hershman JM. 2013. Hashimoto's thyroiditis and papillary thyroid carcinoma: is there a correlation? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:474–482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Azizi G, Keller J, Lewis M, Piper K, Puett D, Rivenbark KM, Malchoff C. 2014. Association of Hashimoto's thyroiditis with thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 21:845–852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Corrias A, Cassio A, Weber G, Mussa A, Wasniewska M, Rapa A, Gastaldi R, Einaudi S, Baronio F, Vigone MC. 2008. Thyroid nodules and cancer in children and adolescents affected by autoimmune thyroiditis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 162:526–531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Srinivasan M, Sedmak D, Jewell S. 2002. Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids. Am J Pathol 161:1961–1971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]