Abstract
Objective:
The aim of this study was to report the first cases of salvage radiotherapy (RT) using the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) targeted on choline positron emission tomography (PET) uptake in a local recurrent prostate cancer, after a radical prostatectomy.
Methods:
Four patients received salvage irradiation for biochemical relapse that occurred after the initial radical prostatectomy. The relapse occurred from 10 months to 6 years with PSA levels ranging from 2.35 to 4.86 ng ml−1. For each patient, an 18F-choline PET-CT showed a focal choline uptake in prostatic fossa, with standardized uptake value calculated on the basis of predicted lean body mass (SUL) max of 3.3–6.8. No involved lymph node or distant metastases were diagnosed. IMRT doses were of 62.7 Gy (1.9 Gy/fraction, 33 fractions), with a SIB of 69.3 Gy (2.1 Gy/fraction, 33 fractions) to a PET-guided target volume.
Results:
Acute toxicities were limited. We observed no gastrointestinal toxicity ≥grade 2 and only one grade 2 genitourinary toxicity. At 1-month follow-up evaluation, no complication and a decrease in PSA level (6.8–43.8% of the pre-therapeutic level) were reported. After 4 months, a decrease in PSA level was obtained for all the patients, ranging from 30% to 70%. At a median follow-up of 15 months, PSA level was controlled for all the patients, but one of them experienced a distant lymph node recurrence.
Conclusion:
Salvage irradiation to the prostate bed with SIB guided by PET-CT is feasible, with biological efficacy and no major acute toxicity.
Advances in knowledge:
IMRT with PET-oriented SIB for salvage treatment of prostate cancer is possible, without major acute toxicity.
INTRODUCTION
Curative salvage radiotherapy (RT) is the cornerstone of local prostate adenocarcinoma recurrence treatment, after radical prostatectomy (RP).1 A clinical examination cannot usually determine the site (local, regional and systemic) of the recurrence in case of biochemical relapse (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 0.2 ng ml−1). As a consequence, various image modalities were developed. Positron emission tomography (PET) labelled with 11Ccholine or with 18Fcholine was shown to be more sensitive than the conventional imaging techniques for detection of prostate cancer recurrence,2 with a sensitivity and a specificity (depending on PSA value and PSA kinetics) up to 75.4% and 82%, respectively.3 As suggested in a recent meta-analysis, choline PET-CT can be proposed as the first image examination for patients with biochemical relapse and PSA levels between 1 and 50 ng ml−1.4 Because salvage RT was shown to be more effective when the treatment is delivered at the earliest sign of the recurrence, an early relapse imaging is of primary importance for therapeutic decision.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) allows the simultaneous delivery of different doses, to different target volumes, within a single RT fraction. The possibility to determine the target volume delineation for a recurrent prostate cancer by choline PET-CT has been demonstrated and choline PET-CT was proven to impact the planning target volume (PTV) of patients experiencing salvage RT.5,6
The aim of this pilot study was to report the first cases of salvage RT using IMRT with SIB targeted on choline PET-CT uptake in prostate cancers' local recurrence.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
The institutional review board approved the study, which was conducted in compliance with the Helsinki declaration. All patients signed informed consent.
Patient population
Patients with a local recurrence within the prostatic fossa confirmed by a choline PET-CT, were included in 2013 after multidisciplinary team decision. Inclusion criteria were a biochemical relapse after previous RP, an intense focal choline uptake near vesicourethral anastomosis in the prostatic fossa and the absence of metastases (confirmed by a CT scan and a bone scintigraphy). All choline PET-CT were performed in the same nuclear medicine department. The patients' characteristics (age, pre-operative D'Amico risk classification, time to biochemical relapse and hormonal treatment) and the prior treatment history (pelvic lymphadenectomy and surgical margins of resection) were reported.
Choline PET-CT characteristics
Choline PET-CT were performed on the same PET-computed tomography (Discovery™, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). Patients received 2 MBq kg−1 of 18F-choline (IASOCholine®; AAA, IASON Graz, France). PET was acquired by a time-of-flight technique in 3D mode with a Discovery 690 system. CT images were used for attenuation correction and topographic localization. The emission data were corrected for scatter and attenuation, then reconstructed by a fully OSEM 3D iterative algorithm. Pelvic static acquisition was performed 5- to 10-min post-choline injection. A whole-body scan was acquired 60 min after choline injection. Images were reviewed by a nuclear medicine and molecular imaging physician. Evaluation was based on visual and semiquantitative analysis of SULmax (maximum standard uptake value normalized to lean body mass) to reduce body fat percentage related variability. The uptake in prostatic fossa was considered pathological when it was higher than baseline and associated with a rising SULmax between the two PET-CT acquisitions.
Treatment definition
Simulation CT scan
Maximum delay between the choline PET-CT and the simulation CT scan was 1 week. Patients underwent simulation CT scan on a Discovery CT Simulator (GE Healthcare) in supine position with 2.5-mm slice thickness, without contrast agent infusion.
Volume definition
All plans were delineated and calculated using the Eclipse™ treatment planning system (Varian® Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The clinical target volume (CTV) delineation was based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Guidelines and included the prostatic fossa and the periprostatic tissue. The planning target volume number 1 (PTV1) was generated using a 5-mm margin to the CTV. The delineation of the choline PET-CT uptake in prostatic bed was performed after PET-CT images fusion based on rigid transformations (Registration; Varian Medical Systems). This biological target volume (BTV) was approved by one nuclear medicine and molecular imaging physician and one radiation oncologist. The BTV was transferred to the contouring and simulation system (Eclipse, SomaVision; Varian Medical Systems). Planning target volume number 2 (PTV2) was generated using an 8-mm margin to the BTV. Segmented organs at risk (OAR) were the femoral heads, the bowel, the bladder and the rectum.
Dosimetry
The calculation was performed with the Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems) based on the AAA algorithm and a grid of 2 mm. The optimization process was based on the iterative algorithm Helios-DVO-10028 (Varian Medical Systems). International commission guidelines on radiation units and measurements (ICRU 83 report) were applied. Dose constraints to OAR were optimized using the QUANTEC dose constraints.7
Dose prescription and delivery
Prescribed doses were 62.7 Gy (1.9 Gy/fraction, 33 fractions) to PTV1, and 69.3 Gy (2.1 Gy/fraction, 33 fractions, i.e. a biologically equivalent dose of 70 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction) to PTV2. Patients were treated using Varian linear accelerators (Clinac® iX and 2100C upgraded with multi-leaf collimators and an on board imaging system; Varian, Salt Lake City, UT) in IMRT.
Toxicity evaluation and follow-up
The follow-up was calculated from the end of RT. Patients were assessed for toxicity every week during RT, 1 month after RT completion and every 3 months after this. RT-related toxicities were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 4.0 (CTCAEv4.0). Acute toxicities were defined by toxicity occurrences within 3 months from the beginning of the RT. Late toxicities occurred after these 3 months. Simultaneously, the PSA was assessed 1 month after RT completion and every 3 months after this.
RESULTS
Patient characteristics
Four consecutive patients were treated using IMRT with SIB for a local prostate cancer recurrence, after RP. At the time of the RT, mean age was 66.8 years. At diagnosis, based on D'amico classification, two patients were staged “intermediate risk”, one “low risk” and one “high risk”. One patient was diagnosed with positive resection margins. One patient received a 6-month hormonal treatment after surgery, because of a detectable PSA. Patients and prior-to-treatment characteristics are reported in Table 1.
Table 1.
Patient and prior to radiation therapy characteristics
| Characteristics | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 52 | 72 | 72 | 71 |
| d'Amico risk stratificationa | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | Low |
| Gleasona | 8 (4 + 4) | 7 (3 + 4) | 7 (3 + 4) | 7 (3 + 4) |
| PSAa | 36 | 15.3 | 12.5 | 9.9 |
| Radical prostatectomy | + | + | + | + |
| Pelvic lymphadenectomy | + | + | + | − |
| pTNM | pT3a pN0 M0 | pT2c pN0 M0 | pT2c pN0 M0 | pT2a Nx M0 |
| Resection margins | R1 | R0 | R0 | R0 |
| Post-operative detectable PSA | − | − | − | + |
| Short hormonal treatmentb | − | − | − | + |
| Adjuvant radiotherapy | − | − | − | − |
| Long hormonal treatmentc | − | − | − | − |
| Time to biochemical relapse (months) | 10 | 85 | 29 | 88 |
PSA, prostate-specific antigen.
In clinical pre-operative setting.
In 6-month duration.
In 36-month duration.
Treatment characteristics
The dose constraints to PTVs and OAR were respected. The mean PTV1 and PTV2 were 188 cm3 (range: 133–255 cm3) and 21 cm3 (range: 12–40 cm3), respectively. The mean dose received by 95% (D95) of the PTV1 and PTV2 were 61.4 and 68.4 Gy, respectively. The mean maximal dose received by the PTV1 and PTV2 were 64.0 and 70.8 Gy, respectively. The mean percentage of bladder and rectal wall volume receiving at least 60 Gy (V60) were 34% (21–41%) and 24% (20–31%), respectively. PTV and OAR dose–volume histograms are resumed in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Delineation of PTV1 (clear blue) and PTV2 (red), and HDV of PTV1 (clear blue), PTV2 (red), the bladder (blue), the rectum (brown) and the femoral heads (grey). PTV, planning target volume. For colour image see online.
Toxicities
The median follow-up was 15 months (range: 15–23 months). No grade 3, 4 or 5 toxicities were reported. One acute grade 2 genitourinary toxicity was reported (pollakiuria). One patient experienced acute grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicity (diarrhoea). The other two patients experienced grade 1 genitourinary (pollakiuria) and gastrointestinal (diarrhoea) toxicities. Two months after RT completion, all acute toxicities were resolved. Three patients experienced late toxicities at last follow-up. One grade 2 digestive toxicity was reported, with bleeding haemorrhoids. One grade 1 digestive toxicity (haemorrhoids) and one grade 1 urinary toxicity (pollakiuria) were also diagnosed.
Efficacy
At last follow-up, all patients were alive. One month after RT, the mean PSA level decreased for all patients [from 3.22 ng ml−1 (range: 2.77–4.86 ng ml−1) to 2.37 ng ml−1 (range: 2.19–2.70 ng ml−1)] corresponding to a decrease of 7–44%. Three months later, the PSA decreased with values ranging from 0.86 to 1.55 ng ml−1, corresponding to a decrease of 29–64% compared with the first PSA measurement and a decrease of 34–70% compared with the PSA value before the salvage RT. At last follow-up, PSA level was stable, in constant decline or undetectable for all but one patient. One patient presented a biochemical recurrence 11 months after the salvage radiation therapy. The choline PET-CT confirmed an abnormal uptake on one left iliac lymph node. This patient could be included in the GETUG P07 protocol and SIB-IMRT could be performed again, concurrently with a hormonal treatment. 54 Gy/1.8 Gy on pelvic lymph nodes, with a 66 Gy/2.2 Gy boost on the abnormal PET-CT uptake were delivered in 30 fractions. 23 months after the initial radiation therapy, the PSA level was undetectable. Data on efficacy are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Data on efficacy
| Characteristics | Patient 1a | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial PSA, before radical prostatectomyb | 36.00 | 15.30 | 12.51 | 9.94 |
| PSA at biochemical recurrence (baseline)b | 2.77 | 2.89 | 2.35 | 4.86 |
| M1 post-salvage radiotherapy PSAb | 2.39 | 2.19 | 2.19 | 2.70 |
| M4 post-salvage radiotherapy PSAb | 0.86 | 0.95 | 1.55 | 1.45 |
| PSA at last follow-upb | <0.03 | 0.23 | 1.59 | 0.5 |
| Month post-salvage radiotherapy | M23 | M15 | M17 | M15 |
M, month; PSA, prostate-specific antigen.
Patient who was diagnosed with a biochemical recurrence 11 months post-salvage radiation therapy.
All PSA values are given in nanograms per millilitre.
DISCUSSION
In case of a biochemical relapse, all conventional imaging modalities have shown a limited sensitivity for the relapsing site detection. The choline PET-CT has the advantage to localize all sites of the disease with a good sensitivity and specificity.3 Of course, PET-CT sensitivity depends on the PSA value, and the present study could not have been conducted if the PET-CT had been performed at time of biochemical recurrence (PSA > 0.2 ng ml−1), because of the low sensitivity of the choline PET at these PSA values. It is well recognized that the salvage radiation therapy probably has better results when it is performed on patients with a PSA < 0.5 ng ml−1. The present study highlights particular cases where the salvage RT cannot be performed at low values of PSA, either because of an extremely fast rising of the PSA level (Patient 1: +2 ng l−1 in 9 months) or because of an elderly age and reluctance to treat patients with rising PSA (Patients 2, 3 and 4). In these specific situations, the choline PET-CT might improve the salvage RT's efficacy, with a higher dose delivered on the detected local recurrence area. This strategy is not validated and should not be an option for patients with low PSA values, since it is not ethical to wait until the PSA is rising to high levels to be able to find a corresponding localization on the PET-CT. However, salvage RT indications in patients with a PSA level > 1 ng ml−1 is becoming a daily routine situation, especially among a geriatric population that wants to defer the treatment as much as possible. In these particular cases, the PET-CT-guided integrated dose escalation could be a good treatment option. In the present study, the delineation of the choline uptake volume was performed manually, based on a visual analysis. The manual delineation of target volumes is the most used technique, despite its highly operator-dependent nature. Automated delineation might not only reduce the operator's error and subjectivity, improve the reproducibility, but also increase the volumes.8 Several studies described different techniques for the delineation of volumes, using the choline uptake for salvage RT after an initial irradiation. Even so, the choice of the optimal BTV delineation technique remains an unanswered question. Pinkawa et al9 defined the BTV using a tumour-to-background uptake ratio >2 in choline PET-CT. Wang et al10 suggested that the semiautomated techniques might replace the manual delineation for partial prostate reirradiation especially with the threshold-based approaches with a median value ≈44%. The post-operative volumes delineation is also a controversial matter. Malone et al11 compared four of the guidelines and reported that the recommended CTV was significantly different between all these guidelines. A recent study12 described an optimal target volume for the salvage RT, including 97% of the suspected tumour recurrences.
To our knowledge, the present study is the first report on IMRT with an integrated boost and a dose escalation in the prostatic fossa. Only one study described a salvage RT after a RP with integrated boost targeted on local relapses in the prostatic bed visualized on endorectal MRI but no data on efficacy was provided.13 Regarding the acute toxicities, no major toxicities were reported, in accordance with other authors.14,15 Regarding the efficacy, although the very small number of patient is a limitation, the image-guided radiation therapy with choline PET might be an attractive solution, in the particular cases of biochemical relapses with PSA values >1,0. The development of more specific PET radiotracers (e.g. prostate-specific membrane antigen) or hybrid PET-MRI, which could improve target volume delineation, is also truly challenging. The PET-CT using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (68Ga-labelled-PSMA PET/CT) might be a very interesting option in a close future. Preliminary studies suggested a better sensitivity and specificity compared to the choline PET, especially when it is associated with low PSA levels (<0.5 ng ml−1).16 Early imaging of targets in case of a biochemical relapse might allow image-guided dose escalation with a PSA level <0.5 ng ml−1.
CONCLUSION
The present pilot study suggests that a salvage RT of a local recurrent prostate cancer confirmed by choline PET-CT can be performed with IMRT-SIB. Dose escalation on the choline uptake could be performed without any excessive acute toxicity and with acceptable efficacy. These results are very preliminary and should be confirmed by a future phase I/II trial evaluating the true clinical benefit of this strategy. Salvage radiation therapy should be performed when PSA <0.5 ng ml−1 for a maximal efficacy, indeed. PET-CT-guided integrated dose escalation could be a treatment option only for patients who decide not to be treated by salvage RT as soon as the biochemical relapse is diagnosed.
Acknowledgments
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Bill and Sally Miller for their English reviewing.
Contributor Information
Aurélien Wahart, Email: aurelien.wahart@icloire.fr.
Jean-Baptiste Guy, Email: jeanbaguy@gmail.com.
Alexis Vallard, Email: alexis.vallard@icloire.fr.
Benjamin Geissler, Email: benjamin.geissler@icloire.fr.
Majed Ben Mrad, Email: majed.benmrad@icloire.fr.
Alexander T Falk, Email: alexander@falk.re.
Nathalie Prevot, Email: nathalie.prevot@icloire.fr.
Guy de Laroche, Email: guy.delaroche@icloire.fr.
Chloé Rancoule, Email: chloe.rancoule@icloire.fr.
Cyrus Chargari, Email: chargari-vdg@hotmail.fr.
Nicolas Magné, Email: nicolas.magne@icloire.fr.
REFERENCES
- 1.Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 467–79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mitchell CR, Lowe VJ, Rangel LJ, Hung JC, Kwon ED, Karnes RJ. Operational characteristics of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence after initial treatment. J Urol 2013; 189: 1308–13. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.De Bari B, Alongi F, Lestrade L, Giammarile F. Choline-PET in prostate cancer management: the point of view of the radiation oncologist. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2014; 91: 234–47. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Von Eyben FE, Kairemo K. Meta-analysis of 11C-choline and 18F-choline PET/CT for management of patients with prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2014; 35: 221–30. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marzola MC, Chondrogiannis S, Ferretti A, Grassetto G, Rampin L, Massaro A, et al. Role of 18F-choline PET/CT in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: correlation with trigger PSA, PSA velocity, PSA doubling time, and metastatic distribution. Clin Nucl Med 2013; 38: e26–32. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318266cc38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Souvatzoglou M, Krause BJ, Pürschel A, Thamm R, Schuster T, Buck AK, et al. Influence of 11C-choline PET/CT on the treatment planning for salvage radiation therapy in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2011; 99: 193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, Eisbruch A, Jackson A, Marks LB, et al. Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76(Suppl. 3): S3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hong R, Halama J, Bova D, Sethi A, Emami B. Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 720–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pinkawa M, Attieh C, Piroth MD, Holy R, Nussen S, Klotz J, et al. Dose-escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer—evaluation of the dose distribution with and without 18F-choline PET-CT detected simultaneous integrated boost. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93: 213–9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang H, Vees H, Miralbell R, Wissmeyer M, Steiner C, Ratib O, et al. 18F-fluorocholine PET-guided target volume delineation techniques for partial prostate re-irradiation in local recurrent prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93: 220–5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Malone S, Croke J, Roustan-Delatour N, Belanger E, Avruch L, Malone C, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of four consensus guidelines and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-CRT versus tomotherapy IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84: 725–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Park JS, Park W, Pyo HR, Park BK, Park SY, Choi HY, et al. Suggestion for the prostatic fossa clinical target volume in adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after a radical prostatectomy. Radiother Oncol 2014; 110: 240–4. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zilli T, Jorcano S, Peguret N, Caparrotti F, Hidalgo A, Khan HG, et al. Dose-adapted salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy based on an erMRI target definition model: toxicity analysis. Acta Oncol Stockh Swed 2014; 53: 96–102. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.837584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ippolito E, Cellini N, Digesù C, Cilla S, Mantini G, Balducci M, et al. Postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost in prostate cancer: a dose-escalation trial. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig 2013; 31: 87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Katayama S, Habl G, Kessel K, Edler L, Debus J, Herfarth K, et al. Helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the pelvic lymph nodes with integrated boost to the prostate bed-initial results of the PLATIN 3 Trial. BMC Cancer 2014; 14: 20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, et al. Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014; 41: 11–20. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2525-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

