Abstract
The aim of emergency imaging is to detect treatable lesions before secondary neurological damage occurs. CT plays a primary role in the acute setting of head trauma, allowing accurate detection of lesions requiring immediate neurosurgical treatment. CT is also accurate in detecting secondary injuries and is therefore essential in follow-up. This review discusses the main characteristics of primary and secondary brain injuries.
INTRODUCTION
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major health issue responsible for considerable mortality and long-term morbidity worldwide, especially among subjects under the age of 44 years.1 The incidence of traumatic craniocerebral injuries is approximately 1.6 million per year in the USA, resulting in >50,000 deaths and >70,000 patients with permanent disability.2,3
The aim of emergency imaging is to detect treatable lesions before secondary neurological damage occurs.4 There is evidence that prompt neurosurgical management of TBI can significantly improve outcome, especially if decompression is performed within 48 h of injury.5–7
CT is the imaging modality of choice for evaluation of the acute head-injured patient. It is quick, non-invasive and widely available and has few contraindications. CT advantages for assessment of TBI include its sensitivity for demonstrating acute intra-axial and extra-axial haemorrhage, mass effect, ventricular size and bone fractures. Limitations include low sensitivity in detecting small non-haemorrhagic lesions such as cortical contusions and diffuse axonal injuries (DAIs), as well as in early demonstration of hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy.8
This review discusses the role of imaging in TBI with special focus on CT and illustrates the main characteristics of primary and secondary brain injuries.
INDICATIONS FOR CT IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD TRAUMA
The major appropriateness criteria for imaging of acute head trauma include the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria, the New Orleans Criteria and the Canadian Head CT rules.9–11 There is general agreement that patients considered at high or moderate risk for craniocerebral injury should undergo non-enhanced CT (NECT) early on admission. Whether patients with minor head injury should be imaged remains controversial. Clinical risk factors considered as predictive of need for neurosurgical intervention or of clinically important brain damage in patients with mild or minor TBI include failure to reach a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 within 2 h, the presence of a suspected open skull fracture or a basal skull fracture, vomiting, an age over 60 or 65 years, drug or alcohol intoxication, deficits in short-term memory and seizure.12 In all children aged less than 2 years, imaging deems to be “very appropriate”, given the difficulties with neurological assessment in this age group.
TBI is an evolving process with biochemical changes occurring within the injured brain that may result in progression of primary lesions or eventually lead to secondary injury. Therefore, the presence of intra- or extra-axial lesions on the initial CT scan warrants close observation and imaging follow-up.13 Approximately 25–45% of parenchymal contusions increase in size and 16% of diffuse injuries demonstrate significant evolution with evidence of new mass lesions on subsequent CT (Figure 1).14,15 Progression of primary lesions typically occurs within the first 24 h after the baseline CT.16 CT is also essential in detecting secondary injuries, such as cerebral oedema, ischaemia and herniation.17,18
Figure 1.
Delayed post-traumatic haemorrhage in a 76-year-old female. (a) Non-enhanced CT (NECT) shows left parietal soft-tissue swelling in the site of impact (arrow) and contrecoup right frontal haemorrhagic contusions (arrows). A small right hemispheric isodense subdural haematoma is also noted (arrowheads). (b) NECT obtained 4 h later depicts a large right frontal intraparenchymal haematoma with severe mass effect and subfalcine herniation (arrow). The patient died shortly after the scan was obtained.
MRI is seldom performed in the acute setting of TBI because of the complex logistics of patient transport and monitoring, long imaging times and sensitivity to patient motion. However, MRI is more sensitive than CT for detection of small post-traumatic focal brain lesions.19 MRI is considered the modality of choice for patients with subacute and chronic TBI and is recommended for patients with acute head trauma when CT fails to explain the neurological findings.
MULTIDETECTOR CT IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
In recent years, there have been notable advances in CT technology. Multidetector CT allows near-isotropic voxel acquisition that can be used to generate high-quality two-dimensional multiplanar reformation and three-dimensional (3D) images. Similarly, major advances have been made in image-processing software and hardware.
NECT scans of the brain should be obtained from just below the foramen magnum through the vertex. CT images are usually obtained at 120 kV and 200–400 mA in adults. Rotation time, slice collimation and pitch vary depending on the type of the scanner. CT images can be reconstructed at different thicknesses, using different algorithms. Two series of axial data sets should be obtained, one using soft tissue and one with bone-reconstruction algorithms, which both can be used for interpretation or to create multiplanar or 3D images.20 Transverse reconstructed images are usually 1 mm thick with a reconstruction interval of 0.4 mm.
With the increasingly widespread use of picture archiving and communication system, imaging interpretation is now performed on computer workstations, allowing for optimal window setting. A narrow window width (80–100 HU) is used to view the brain, whereas a slightly wider window (150–200 HU) is recommended to increase contrast between extra-axial collections and the adjacent skull.21
In patients with head trauma, multiplanar reformation is recommended to better evaluate fracture lines and orientation of displaced fragments, especially in patients with complex facial and temporal bone fractures, thus facilitating surgical planning.22 Multiplanar images can be thickened into slabs by means of projectional techniques including average, maximum and minimum intensity projection; surface-shaded display; and volume rendering.23 3D reconstructions of the skull are generally limited to difficult cases. The two main techniques for 3D reconstruction of bones are surface-shaded display and volume rendering, which both significantly improve fracture detection when compared with transverse sections alone.24–26 3D angiographic maximum-intensity projections and volume rendering imaging are also essential in vessel imaging interpretation, providing detailed characterization of arterial narrowing or occlusion, and in planning surgical or endovascular intervention.27
These capabilities have considerably enhanced the utility of CT, and CT usage has correspondingly increased. Given the health risk associated with ionizing radiation, new technologies have been developed, aimed at reducing radiation exposure. Currently, it is common practice to adapt radiation level using weight- or size-based protocols, which is also a requirement for American College of Radiology accreditation of paediatric imaging centres.28,29 Scanning techniques that depend on patient size include one or more of the following elements: size-dependent beam-shaping filters, manual tube current technique charts, automatic exposure control and optimal tube potential.30 These strategies have proven particularly useful in children.
MULTIDETECTOR CT ANGIOGRAPHY
Craniocervical CT angiography (CTA) is often obtained as part of a whole-body work-up for trauma patients. CTA provides high spatial resolution and allows rapid assessment of penetrating and blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs). The spectrum of traumatic vascular injuries includes arterial dissection, pseudoaneurysm formation, carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF), dural venous sinus injury or active haemorrhage.31
An appropriate screening algorithm for BCVIs allows early detection and treatment, ultimately reducing the associated morbidity and mortality rates.32–34 Craniocervical CTA should be obtained in trauma patients meeting the “Modified Denver Criteria”, which can be classified into risk factors, and signs and symptoms. Signs and symptoms include arterial haemorrhage, cervical bruits, expanding neck haematomas, focal neurological deficits, major discrepancies between neurological and imaging findings, and ischaemic stroke on follow-up CT.35–37 Risk factors considered as predictors of BCVI include cervical spine fractures, mid-face Lefort II and III fractures, DAI with a GCS score of <6, skull base fractures with involvement of the carotid canal, and near hanging with anoxic brain injury.
Sensitivity of integrated craniocervical CTA protocols in detecting BCVIs has been proven comparable to that of dedicated neck CTA despite venous contamination due to reflux of contrast material and a low signal-to-noise ratio from arm elevation.38
Moreover, the introduction of advanced CT techniques such as dual-energy CT for cervical CTA has allowed more accurate and faster bone subtraction as compared with threshold-based bone subtraction.39 Dual-energy CT allows better visualization of the neck vessels, especially in their intraosseous segments, namely the petrous portions of the carotid arteries and vertebral arteries coursing through the foramina transversaria.40
Digital subtraction angiography remains the definitive diagnostic tool for vascular injury because of its high sensitivity and specificity. However, because of invasiveness with a 1.3% complication rate, which includes arterial dissection, thrombosis and stroke, and owing to its limited accessibility, digital subtraction angiography is usually reserved to unresolved cases with dubious imaging findings and high clinical suspicion.41,42
CT FOR PREDICTION OF OUTCOME IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
Outcome prediction in TBI has been notably difficult. Mortality correlates with the severity of injury based on the GCS score.43,44 TBI has also been classified according to damage severity as demonstrated by neuroimaging. The Marshall CT score was published in 1992 and proved to correlate the presence of intracranial abnormalities on CT with intracranial pressure (ICP) and outcome.45 The Marshall CT classification identifies six groups of patients with head trauma based on the following parameters on CT: the presence of a focal mass lesion (evacuated or non-evacuated) and/or diffuse intracranial abnormalities including brain swelling and midline shift. Some authors claim that the Marshall classification, broadly classifying injuries into diffuse and focal categories, fails to distinguish between subtypes of intracranial lesions and suggest that it may be preferable to use combinations of individual CT predictors.46,47 The Rotterdam score is a more recent classification system which allows single CT abnormalities to be scored separately and includes two additional parameters: traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage and intraventricular haemorrhage.46 Another classification scheme is the Helsinki CT score, which considers bleeding type and size, intraventricular haemorrhage and suprasellar cisterns.47 Because neurological examination may be unreliable following sedation in patients with severe TBI, these CT scoring systems play a primary role in the early management of brain lesions and in predicting outcome.
CLASSIFICATION OF HEAD INJURY
Craniocerebral lesions can be classified into primary and secondary. Primary lesions occur as a direct result of a trauma to the head and include scalp injuries, skull fractures, extra-axial haemorrhage and intra-axial lesions. Secondary brain injury occurs as a complication of primary lesions and includes ischaemic and hypoxic damage, cerebral oedema and brain herniations. Extra-axial haemorrhage includes epidural haematoma (EDH), subdural haematoma (SDH), and subarachnoid (SAH) and intraventricular (IVH) haemorrhage. Primary intra-axial injuries include DAI, cortical contusions, intraparenchymal haematomas (IPHs) and vascular lesions.
The main imaging characteristics of primary and secondary TBIs are presented below.
PRIMARY INJURY
Fractures
Fractures of the skull are seen as calvarial or skull base disruption on bone algorithm CT images. Skull fractures can be closed or open, simple or comminuted, linear, depressed, elevated or diastatic. Fractures can involve the calvaria, the base of the skull or both.
Major complications that can occur with fractures of the skull base include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and infection, cranial nerves damage and injury to the dural sinuses, jugular vein or internal carotid artery (ICA).48 The highest incidence of carotid injury has been associated with fractures involving the petrous segment of the carotid canal, whereas the most frequently fractured portion of the carotid canal is represented by the lacerum–cavernous junction.49
Thin-section (1-mm) multidetector CT with bone algorithm and 3D reconstructions is recommended for the evaluation of fractures in the skull base, orbit and facial bones.50
The presence of skull fracture does not correlate with the severity of TBI. Skull fractures are observed in only 25% of fatal head injury at autopsy.51 However, the incidence of contusion and/or haematoma is significantly higher in patients with a skull fracture than in those with no fractures.52
Temporal bone fractures
Fractures of the temporal bone have been traditionally classified into longitudinal, transverse or mixed depending on their orientation relative to the long axis of the petrous bone. A newly proposed classification system divides temporal bone fractures into petrous (involving the otic capsule and/or petrous apex) and non-petrous (NPF) types (Figure 2).53 NPFs are further subdivided based on the presence of middle ear and/or mastoid involvement.
Figure 2.
Temporal bone fractures. (a) Petrous fracture of the right temporal bone. Axial CT shows fracture line (arrows) involving the vestibule, labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve canal and cochlea, resulting in sensorineural hearing loss and facial nerve palsy. (b) Non-petrous fracture of the right temporal bone. Axial CT demonstrates fracture of the temporal squama (arrowheads) and dislocation of the incus (arrows), responsible for conductive hearing loss. Haemorrhage in the mastoid air cells and middle ear is also noted.
This more recent classification scheme demonstrated better correlation with clinical complications of temporal bone fractures such as facial nerve weakness, CSF leakage, sensorineural and conductive hearing loss. Petrous fractures appear to be significantly associated with an increased risk of facial nerve injury, carotid injury, CSF leaks and sensorineural hearing loss because of involvement of the inner ear structures. Likewise, the “middle ear” subcategory of NPFs carries an increased risk of conductive hearing loss secondary to ossicular chain damage. “Mastoid” NPFs seem to appear clinically less relevant.54,55
Extra-axial haemorrhage
Extra-axial haemorrhage includes EDH, SDH, and SAH and IVH.
Epidural haematoma
EDHs occur in 0.2–12% of acute head-injured patients, and the overall mortality is 5%.56–60 EDHs generally occur at the site of impact, and a fracture is associated in >90% of cases.61 In contrast to SDHs, EDHs rarely cross the cranial sutures but can extend across the dural reflections. Hence, EDHs may be seen extending above and below the tentorium cerebelli or crossing the midline (Figure 3). 95% of EDHs are supratentorial. Most are temporal or parietal and usually result from disruption of the middle meningeal artery or one of its branches. Conversely, the vast majority of extra-axial haemorrhages in the cerebral posterior fossa are venous in origin, from disruption of dural veins and sinuses, which are especially abundant in this anatomic compartment.
Figure 3.
Venous epidural haematoma from superior longitudinal sinus disruption. (a) Coronal reconstruction CT shows subgaleal haemorrhage (arrows) and a large biconvex hyperattenuating extra-axial collection (large arrows), extending across the midline. The vertex epidural haematoma (EDH) exerts moderate mass effect on the underlying frontal lobes. At the vertex, the periosteal layer of the dura, which forms the external wall of the superior longitudinal sinus, is scarcely adherent to the sagittal suture. Therefore, EDHs of the vertex can cross the midline. Some foci of subarachnoid haemorrhage are noted on the medial surface of the frontal lobes (curved arrows). There is also right frontal encephalomalacia following previous injury (arrowheads). (b) Three-dimensional CT reconstruction viewed from above shows a sagittal fracture line (arrows) involving the left frontal and bilateral parietal bones, crossing the coronal and sagittal sutures.
Acute EDHs typically present as biconvex, hyperattenuating extra-axial collections on NECT. Occasionally, an acute EDH can appear heterogeneous because of areas of low attenuation, representing actively extravasating unclotted blood, also referred to as the swirl sign (Figure 4).61
Figure 4.
Delayed epidural haematoma following decompressive craniectomy (courtesy of Dr MC Valentini). Non-enhanced CT demonstrates a large temporoparietal biconvex epidural haematoma, with low-density areas suggesting active bleeding (swirl sign) (arrow). There is severe mass effect, with left-to-right midline shift, and external cerebral herniation through the craniectomy defect. A small left frontal subdural haematoma with fluid–fluid levels is also seen (arrows). The development of a delayed epidural haematoma as a result of decompressive craniectomy represents a life-threatening complication and warrants immediate neurosurgical intervention.
According to previous observations, up to 8% of EDHs are not present on the initial CT scan but rather appear on follow-up.60,62,63 Delayed EDH formation is a rare but well-described complication following evacuation of cerebral haematomas (Figure 4). Contralateral intracranial haematoma formation has been reported in up to 7.4% of cases after decompressive surgery, which is responsible for decreasing the original mass effect supposed to tamponade the disrupted vessels.64 Delayed EDH has also been associated with medical treatment aimed at re-establishing normal blood pressure or ICP in patients presenting with other intracranial lesions.65
Subdural haematoma
SDHs are seen in 12–29% of patients with severe TBI.66 As well as EDHs, the major causes of SDHs are motor vehicle accidents, falls and assaults. SDHs usually arise from rupture of cortical bridging veins because of angular acceleration or deceleration of the head in the sagittal plane.67
On axial CT, acute SDHs appear as crescent-shaped hyperdense collections between the cerebral hemisphere and inner table of the skull, frequently extending along the entire hemispheric convexity. Most SDHs are supratentorial in location and are frequently seen along the falx and tentorium as well. Unlike EDHs, SDHs may cross suture lines, but not dural reflections, and are rarely associated with skull fracture. There is commonly diffuse swelling of the underlying cerebral hemisphere, with midline shift and subfalcine herniation.
According to the literature, mortality rates for acute SDHs approach 60%.68
Rarely, acute SDHs may be isodense or hypodense because of severe anaemia (Figure 5). A heterogeneous CT appearance may occasionally be noted because of active extravasation or mixture of fresh blood and CSF from associated arachnoid tears. A sediment level or haematocrit effect may be observed in patients with clotting disorders (Figure 6).69
Figure 5.
Acute isodense subdural haematoma in a 74-year-old female. (a) Non-enhanced CT shows effacement of the right lateral ventricle, mild dilation of the contralateral ventricle and moderate right-to-left midline shift. The haematoma is poorly seen. (b) Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates enhancement of the cortical veins along the brain surface, allowing easier detection of left frontoparietal isodense subdural haematoma, which displaces the grey–white matter junction medially (arrows).
Figure 6.
Subdural haematoma (SDH) with haematocrit level in a 77-year-old male. Non-enhanced CT shows bilateral hemispheric SDH with fluid–fluid levels, also referred to as the haematocrit effect. SDH with haematocrit levels are frequently encountered in the setting of anticoagulation therapy or coagulopathy. There is no midline shift because of bilateral mass effect with sulcal and ventricular effacement.
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
SAH is demonstrated in approximately 40% of patients with moderate to severe TBI.70 It may result from injury to small subarachnoid vessels or from rupture of haemorrhagic contusions or haematomas into the subarachnoid space. SAH appears as curvilinear foci of increased attenuation within sulci and cisterns on NECT (Figure 7).
Figure 7.
Traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage in a 73-year-old female. (a, b) Non-enhanced CT depicts increased density material in the basal cisterns, fronto-orbital sulci and left sylvian fissure (arrows). Subdural haematomas are noted overlying the tentorium (curved arrows). There is soft-tissue swelling in the right fronto-orbital region (arrowheads).
Intraventricular haemorrhage
The incidence of traumatic IVH varies between 1.5% and 3%, with rates approaching 10% in patients with severe TBI.71 IVH may result from stretch injury to the subependymal vessels that line the walls of the lateral and third ventricles or from bleeding of the choroid plexuses. Recent research demonstrated that the presence of IVH on CT was associated with corpus callosum injury on MRI in patients with blunt TBI, suggesting the role of IVH as a predictor for this disease.71 IVH may also result from direct extension of a parenchymal haematoma into the ventricular system or from retrograde flow of SAH.
On CT, IVH is seen as hyperdense material, tending to pool dependently within the ventricular system (Figure 8a).
Figure 8.
Intraventricular haemorrhage and diffuse axonal injury (DAI) of the corpus callosum in a 30-year-old male with closed head trauma from high-speed motor vehicle accident. (a) Axial non-enhanced CT (NECT) shows hyperattenuation in the trigone of the right lateral ventricle consistent with haemorrhage (curved arrow). NECT also demonstrates mixed density subdural collection over the right convexity, with low attenuation areas indicating active bleed (arrows). There is moderate swelling of the underlying hemisphere and right to left midline shift. A small hyperattenuating left frontal subdural haematoma is also noted. CT also shows a large right parietal subgaleal haematoma (arrowheads). (b) Diffusion-weighted imaging in the same patient demonstrates restricted diffusion in the genu and splenium of corpus callosum (arrows) consistent with DAI.
Parenchymal injuries
Cerebral contusions
Cortical contusions are bruises of the brain surface.51 They occur in 43% of patients with blunt or non-penetrating head injuries and account for approximately half of all intra-axial lesions.72 Cerebral contusions involve the crowns of gyri, causing full-thickness necrosis and haemorrhage of the cortex and leptomeninges.51
In severe injuries, lesions may extend into subcortical white matter.
Contusions can occur in coup or contrecoup sites. They are typically focal or multifocal and are most often haemorrhagic. Coup contusions occur at the site of cranial impact; contrecoup contusions develop opposite or distant from the site of initial impact and are usually larger in size.
The most common locations for cerebral contusions are the inferior frontal and anterior temporal lobes. Cerebral contusions are seen on NECT as small foci of high attenuation within gyral crests; the association with ill-defined hypodense areas of vasogenic oedema is common.
Approximately 25–45% of contusions evolve, increasing in size over time, sometimes coalescing into larger intracerebral haematomas.73 Delayed haemorrhages in areas of the brain that had previously appeared normal occur in approximately 15% of cases.74
Compared with DAI, cerebral contusions are rarely associated with severe impairment of consciousness and are also associated with a better prognosis than DAI.
Intraparenchymal haematoma
Intracerebral haematomas and haemorrhagic contusions are part of the same spectrum of injuries. IPHs are less common than contusions and are observed in approximately 15% of acute head-injured patients.75 As for cerebral contusions, traumatic IPHs are often multiple and show predilection for the frontal and temporal lobes.75
Rarely, IPHs are unrelated to cerebral contusions, resulting from penetrating trauma such as gunshot or stab wounds.
Diffuse axonal injury
DAI is caused by acceleration–deceleration forces in the coronal or sagittal plane usually resulting from non-impact trauma and is also referred to as “axonal stretch injury”.76 Association with skull fracture is rare. DAI is one of the most common parenchymal lesion in patients involved in high-velocity road accidents and is characterized by multiple small haemorrhagic and non-haemorrhagic lesions at the grey–white matter junction, corpus callosum, deep periventricular white matter, dorsolateral aspect of the mid-brain and upper pons. The basal ganglia, internal capsule and hippocampi are also sites of involvement.77
Loss of consciousness typically starts at the moment of impact. DAI rarely causes death but represents the most frequent cause of persistent vegetative state following trauma.
Anatomic distribution of DAI correlates with disease severity, with progressively deeper structural injury occurring with the increase of the acceleration–deceleration forces.78
CT is known to have low sensitivity in detecting DAI, with only a minority of lesions demonstrated on NECT. Only 19% of non-haemorrhagic DAIs are demonstrated on CT and only 20% of haemorrhagic DAIs contain sufficient haemorrhage to be detectable on CT as hyperdense foci.21,79 NECT may show focal areas of decreased attenuation secondary to oedema or punctate foci of increased density at the grey–white matter junction, corpus callosum and brain stem consistent with haemorrhagic DAI (Figure 9).
Figure 9.
Diffuse axonal injury. (a) Non-enhanced CT (NECT) in a 12-year-old female with severe closed head trauma shows small haemorrhagic foci in the subcortical white matter consistent with grade I diffuse axonal injury (DAI) (arrows). A large left parietal subgaleal haematoma is also noted (arrowheads). (b) NECT in a 32-year-old male with severe non-impact head trauma shows low attenuation in the body of the corpus callosum consistent with non-haemorrhagic grade II DAI (arrows). (c) NECT in a patient with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 shows haemorrhage in the dorsolateral aspect of the brain stem consistent with grade III DAI (arrow). According to the Adams and Gennarelli classification, in grade I DAI, lesions involve the grey–white matter interfaces of the frontal and temporal lobes. Grade II DAI involves the corpus callosum in addition to grade I lesions. In Grade III DAI, the dorsolateral mid-brain and upper pons are also affected.70
MRI is superior to CT for demonstrating DAI and is performed to search for DAI in unconscious patients with no evidence of structural brain damage on CT. Gradient-recalled-echo sequences are highly sensitive for detecting small haemorrhages, which are seen as foci of decreased signal intensity.80 Diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI has been proven to be more sensitive than any other sequence in acute stages of non-haemorrhagic DAI and to highly correlate with initial GCS score as well as modified Rankin outcome scale score.81 In the acute stage, DAIs appear as foci of increased signal intensity on DW MRI because of cytotoxic oedema resulting from axonal necrosis (Figure 8b). In the chronic stages of TBI, increased diffusivity and decreased fractional anisotropy are frequent findings, reflecting diffuse white matter abnormalities. Commonly damaged white matter tracts include the superior and inferior longitudinal fasciculus, anterior corona radiata, and frontal and temporal lobes.82 Microstructural white matter injury on diffusion tensor imaging in patients with mild TBI syndrome has been significantly associated with poor cognitive outcome as opposed to traumatic microhaemorrhages on conventional 3-T MRI.83
Diffuse vascular injury
Previous research has shown that diffuse vascular injury is significantly associated with Grade 2 and 3 DAI, suggesting that the two entities depend on the same mechanism and are part of a pathological continuum.84 Autopsy series of patients with diffuse vascular injury show innumerable punctate haemorrhages in the subcortical and deep white matter, as well as in the basal ganglia and thalami, because of disruption of microvasculature by high tensile forces.76 CT findings may be subtle or absent. Susceptibility-weighted MR sequences show uncountable punctate and linear fan-shaped, convergent-type hypointensities that predominate in the subcortical and deep white matter and are classically oriented perpendicularly to the ventricles. The corpus callosum, deep grey nuclei, brain stem and cerebellum are often involved.85 The major differential diagnosis is DAI. The number and anatomic distribution of the haemorrhages allow differentiation from DAI (Figure 10).
Figure 10.
Diffuse vascular injury in a 27-year-old male with severe closed head trauma. (a) Follow-up non-enhanced CT obtained 10 days after admission shows marked hypoattenuation of the deep white matter without mass effect (arrowheads). (b) T2* GRE image shows innumerable punctate hypointensities in the subcortical and deep white matter consistent with diffuse vascular injury (arrows). Brain stem and cerebellum are also affected.
Vascular injuries
Traumatic vascular injury includes arterial occlusion, dissection, pseudoaneurysm formation, arteriovenous fistula and dural venous sinus injury.31 Although uncommon, traumatic vascular injuries represent the most common cause of stroke in subjects younger than 45 years of age.86 At present, the reported incidence of BCVIs varies between 0.3% and 1.6% among all patients with blunt trauma.34 Associated mortality and morbidity rates are 24% and 58%, respectively.87,88
Extracranial vascular trauma
Blunt extracranial vascular injuries typically occur as the result of motor vehicle accidents. The most common mechanism of injury is stretching of the artery from rapid deceleration.89 The ICA is assumed to stretch over the lateral masses of the third and fourth cervical vertebrae, with formation of an intimal tear, which can progress into a dissection in the wall of the artery for a variable distance.90 In most cases, cervical ICA affects the ICA distal to the carotid bulb and does not extend intracranially.91 Other mechanisms involved in ICA injury include direct blows to the head, neck or face; skull base fractures; blunt intraoral trauma; and hyperflexion of the neck. Bilateral dissections have been documented in as many as 45% of patients.92
Extracranial vertebral artery dissection has a more varied aetiology and has been associated with chiropractic manipulation, tennis, seat belt use, yoga, head banging and kickboxing.93
In both carotid and vertebral dissection, delayed onset is common, with symptoms developing after hours or even weeks from the initial injury. Therefore, screening protocols to detect BCVIs are essential in order to decrease mortality and morbidity.
Cervical CTA is the modality of choice for the diagnosis of BCVIs. Pseudoaneurysms appear as contrast material-filled sacs outside the wall of the injured artery. With dissections, CTA typically shows severe narrowing and irregularity of the vessel lumen, creating a “string-like” appearance (Figure 11). The external diameter of the artery is typically increased.94 In acute dissection, NECT may depict a crescent-shaped hyperattenuating area corresponding to a mural haematoma at the upper portion of the cervical ICA.95
Figure 11.
Post-traumatic right carotid-cavernous fistula following fracture of the carotid canal. (a, b) CT angiography shows early opacification of the cavernous sinuses (arrow in a) and a markedly enlarged right superior ophthalmic vein (arrow in b).
Cerebrovascular injuries are more common with penetrating wounds than with blunt trauma, with rates of approximately 25%.96 Blunt trauma and penetrating trauma cause similar lesions, resulting in the formation of pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulae, arterial transection and dissection.80
Intracranial vascular trauma
Intracranial arterial injuries are generally associated with penetrating trauma or skull base fractures. The most commonly injured artery is the ICA, especially at its entrance to the carotid canal at the base of petrous bone or at its exit from the cavernous sinus beneath the anterior clinoid process. Traumatic injuries of the intracranial arteries include dissection, pseudoaneurysm and CCF.96
Traumatic CCF is a direct high-flow arteriovenous shunt that develops within the cavernous sinus as a result of a tear of the cavernous portion of the ICA. The consequent increase in venous pressure causes dilatation of the cavernous sinus and retrograde venous outflow through the superior and inferior ophthalmic veins. Traumatic CCF may present weeks or even months after the initial trauma.97
In patients with CCF, contrast-enhanced CT may demonstrate an enlarged superior ophtalmic vein and cavernous sinus. Other CT features include extraocular muscles enlargement, proptosis and preseptal soft-tissue swelling (Figure 12). Rarely, a unilateral CCF may present with bilateral symptoms, because of venous intercavernous communication.
Figure 12.
Left carotid artery dissection following motor vehicle accident. (a) Axial image from CT angiography (CTA) shows that the left internal carotid is markedly narrowed (arrow). The intramural haematoma cannot be differentiated from the surrounding muscles. (b) Sagittal reformatted image from CTA demonstrates marked narrowing and irregularity of the left carotid lumen (arrows).
SECONDARY INJURY
Post-traumatic brain swelling
Massive brain swelling with severe intracranial hypertension is the most severe of all secondary lesions. Post-traumatic brain swelling is an increase in brain volume resulting from an increase in tissue water content.75 The underlying mechanism is unclear: brain swelling appears to be the result of cerebral oedema, both intracellular (cytotoxic) and extracellular (vasogenic). Brain swelling may be focal or diffuse and occurs in 10–20% of patients with TBI. Children and young adults are especially at risk to develop this condition. Delayed onset is typical, with cerebral oedema appearing 24–48 hours after the initial trauma.97
Decompressive craniectomy is the treatment of choice but prognosis remains poor. Complications include herniation of the cortex through the bone defect, subdural effusions, hydrocephalus, seizures and syndrome of the “trephined” or “sinking skin flap syndrome”.98
CT findings include ill-defined mass effect and effacement of sulci. In early stages of brain swelling, there is normal attenuation of the brain, and grey–white matter differentiation is relatively preserved. As oedema increases, all grey–white matter interfaces fade. The falx and circulating blood into cerebral vessels appear hyperdense relative to the swollen, hypodense cerebral hemispheres. The cerebellum and brain stem are typically spared and also show increased attenuation.97
Brain herniation
Cerebral herniation is the displacement of brain tissue from one cranial compartment to another due to mass effect produced by primary intracranial injury.99
Subfalcine herniation is the most common type of cerebral herniation and is caused by displacement of the anterior cingulate gyrus beneath the falx cerebri. Subfalcine herniation is also known as midline shift and is frequently associated with downward displacement of the corpus callosum. Compression of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle due to mass effect and dilatation of the contralateral ventricle due to obstruction of the foramen of Monro are common CT findings. In severe cases, compression of the pericallosal arteries may result in anterior cerebral artery (ACA) infarction.
Descending transtentorial herniation (DTH) is the second most common type of brain herniation and consists of caudal descent of brain tissue through the tentorial incisura, secondary to mass effect in the frontal, parietal and occipital lobes.100 In DTH, the uncus of the temporal lobe is displaced over the free margin of the tentorium into the ipsilateral suprasellar cistern. As the mass effect increases, the hippocampus also herniates medially over the edge of the tentorium into the ipsilateral quadrigeminal cistern, pushing the mid-brain against the contralateral tentorial edge. As herniation progresses, both the uncus and hippocampus are displaced inferiorly through the tentorial incisura. Displacement of the mid-brain can result in compression of the contralateral cerebral peduncle against the opposite side of the incisura (Kernohan's notch).101 Complications of DTH include damage to the corticospinal and corticobulbar tracts, compression of the posterior cerebral artery and oculomotor nerve, resulting in hemiparesis, infarction and ipsilateral third nerve palsy.100 Compression or stretching of the perforating branches of the basilar artery may occur, resulting in a secondary haemorrhagic mid-brain infarction, known as a Duret haemorrhage.102 Hydrocephalus may develop following distortion and obstruction of the mesencephalic acqueduct.
Axial CT shows effacement of the ambient and lateral suprasellar cisterns from medial displacement of the uncus and hippocampus.
Tonsillar herniation consists in downward displacement of cerebellar tonsils and medial aspect of cerebellar hemispheres through the foramen magnum into the cervical spinal canal. Up to 50% of cases of tonsillar herniation occur in association with descending transtentorial herniation.99 Complications of tonsillar herniation include obstructive hydrocephalus and cerebellar infarction from occlusion of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Compression of the lower brain stem may lead to impairment of consciousness secondary to mass effect on the ascending reticular activating system. As herniation progresses, involvement of the cardiac and respiratory centres of the brain stem may occur, eventually leading to death.99 Tonsillar herniation may be difficult to diagnose on CT. CT may show effacement of the cisterna magna and CSF spaces surrounding the medulla oblongata.
Tonsillar herniation has also been related to intracranial hypotension, the tonsils being pulled downward because of decreased intraspinal CSF pressure.
In ascending transtentorial herniation, the superior vermis and cerebellar hemispheres are displaced superiorly through the tentorial incisura into the supratentorial compartment. Ascending transtentorial herniation occurs rarely in TBI and is generally the result of large posterior fossa haematomas.
Axial CT demonstrates effacement of the supravermian and quadrigeminal cisterns along with mass effect and distortion of the mid-brain.
Post-traumatic cerebral infarction
Post-traumatic cerebral infarction is a rare but severe complication of TBI. In addition to cerebral herniation, other potential causes of infarction include vasospasm, increased ICP, global hypoxia or hypoperfusion, and compressive ischaemia from intracerebral haematomas.103
SUMMARY
Imaging plays a primary role in the management of patients with TBI. CT is the imaging technique of choice in the setting of acute head trauma, allowing accurate detection, and thereby treatment, of extra- and intra-axial haemorrhage, hydrocephalus, mass effect and vascular injuries. CT is also accurate in detecting secondary injuries and is therefore essential in follow-up. In the acute setting, MRI is reserved to patients with severe neurological impairment despite the absence of structural brain damage on CT. MRI is the imaging modality of choice in subacute and chronic TBI and appears to be more reliable in CT in predicting outcome.
Contributor Information
Valentina Lolli, Email: valentina.lolli@erasme.ulb.ac.be.
Martina Pezzullo, Email: martinapezzullo@yahoo.it.
Isabelle Delpierre, Email: isabelle.delpierre@erasme.ulb.ac.be.
Niloufar Sadeghi, Email: nsadeghi@ulb.ac.be.
REFERENCES
- 1.MacDorman MF, Minino AM, Strobino DM, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics–2001. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 1037–52. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.6.1037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sosin DM, Sniezek JE, Waxweiler RJ. Trends in death associated with traumatic brain injury, 1979 through 1992. Success and failure. JAMA 1995; 273: 1778–80. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520460060036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Traumatic brain injury–Colorado, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Utah, 1990–1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 46: 8–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2000; 24(Suppl 1): S1–106. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hoyt DB, Holcomb J, Abraham E, Atkins J, Sopko G. Working Group on Trauma Research Program Summary Report: National Heart Lung Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Department of Defense (DOD). J Trauma 2004; 57: 410–15. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200408000-00038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Bogaev CA, Tisdale N, Germanson T, Bocchicchio B, et al. Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 84–94. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199707000-00018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sahuquillo J, Arikan F. Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (1): CD003983. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003983.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Davis PC; Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging. Head trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1619–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Davis PC, Drayer BP, Anderson RE, Braffman B, Deck MD, Hasso AN, et al. Head trauma. American College of Radiology, ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000; 215(Suppl): 507–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 100–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, Clement C, Lesiuk H, Laupacis A, et al. The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001; 357: 1391–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04561-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maas A, Dearden M, Teasdale GM, Braakman R, Cohadon F, Iannotti F, et al. EBIC guidelines for management of severe head injury in adults. European Brain Injury Consortium. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997; 139: 286–94. doi: 10.1007/BF01808823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chang EF, Meeker M, Holland MC. Acute traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage: risk factors for progression in the early post-injury period. Neurosurgery 2006; 58: 647–56. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000197101.68538.E6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Servadei F, Murray GD, Penny K, Teasdale GM, Dearden M, Iannotti F, et al. The value of the “worst” computed tomographic scan in clinical studies of moderate and severe head injury. European Brain Injury Consortium. Neurosurgery 2000; 46: 70–5. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200001000-00014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Narayan RK, Maas AI, Servadei F, Skolnick BE, Tilinger MN, Marshall LF, et al. Progression of traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage: a prospective observational study. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25: 629–39. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sifri ZC, Livingston DH, Lavery RF, Homnick AT, Mosenthal AC, Mohr AM, et al. Value of repeat cranial computed axial tomography scanning in patients with minimal head injury. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 338–42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Figg RE, Burry TS, Vander Kolk WE. Clinical efficacy of serial computed tomographic scanning in severe closed head injury patients. J Trauma 2003; 55: 1061–4. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000096712.90133.5C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee H, Wintermark M, Gean AD, Ghajar J, Manley GT, Mukherjee P. Focal lesions in acute mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive outcome: CT versus 3T MRI. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25: 1049–56. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Osborn A. Trauma overview. In: Osborn's brain: imaging, pathology, and anatomy. 1st edn. Manitoba, Canada: Amirsys; 2013. pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Le TH, Gean AD. Imaging of head trauma. Semin Roentgenol 2006; 41: 177–89. doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2006.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Saigal K, Winokur RS, Finden S, Taub D, Pribitkin E. Use of three-dimensional computerized tomography reconstruction in complex facial trauma. Facial Plast Surg 2005; 21: 214–20. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-922862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dalrymple NC, Prasad SR, Freckleton MW, Chintapalli KN. Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD). Introduction to the language of three-dimensional imaging with mulidetector CT. Radiographics 2005; 25: 1409–28. doi: 10.1148/rg.255055044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fishman EK, Magid D, Ney DR, Chaney EL, Pizer SM, Rosenman JG, et al. Three-dimensional imaging. Radiology 1991; 181: 321–37. doi: 10.1148/radiology.181.2.1789832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fishman EK, Ney DR. Advanced computer applications in radiology: clinical applications. Radiographics 1993; 13: 463–75. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.13.2.8460231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Philipp MO, Kubin K, Mang T, Hormann M, Metz VM. Three-dimensional volume rendering of multidetector-row CT data: applicable for emergency radiology. Eur J Radiol 2003; 48: 33–8. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00197-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dreizin D, Munera F. Blunt polytrauma: evaluation with 64-section whole-body CT angiography. Radiographics 2012; 32: 609–31. doi: 10.1148/rg.323115099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yu L, Bruesewitz MR, Thomas KB, Fletcher JG, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. Radiographics 2011; 31: 835–48. doi: 10.1148/rg.313105079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for diagnostic reference levels in medical x-ray imaging. In: Practice guidelines and technical standards. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2008. pp. 799–804. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yu L, Liu X, Leng S, Kofler JM, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Qu M, et al. Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med 2009; 1: 65–84. doi: 10.2217/iim.09.5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gaskill-Shipley MF, Tomsick TA. Angiography in the evaluation of head and neck trauma. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1996; 6: 607–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schneidereit NP, Simons R, Nicolaou S, Graeb D, Brown DR, Kirkpatrick A, et al. Utility screening for blunt vascular neck injuries with computed tomographic angiography. J Trauma 2006; 60: 209–15. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000195651.60080.2c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Eastman AL, Chason DP, Perez CL, McAnulty AL, Minei JP. Computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cervical vascular injury: is it ready for primetime? J Trauma 2006; 60: 925–9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197479.28714.62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liang T, Tso DK, Chiu RYW, Nicolaou S. Imaging of blunt vascular neck injuries: a review of screening and imaging modalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201: 884–92. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cothren CC, Moore EE, Ray CE, Jr, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Burch JM. Cervical spine fracture patterns mandating screening to rule out blunt cerebrovascular injury. Surgery 2007; 141: 76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Franz RW, Willette PA, Wood MJ, Wright ML, Hartman JF. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injuries. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 214: 313–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bromberg WJ, Collier BC, Diebel LN, Dwyer KM, Holevar MR, Jacobs DG, et al. Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma 2010; 68: 471–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sliker CW, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE. Diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injuries with 16-MDCT: accuracy of whole-body MDCT compared with neck MDCT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 790–9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Morhard D, Fink C, Graser A, Reiser MF, Becker C, Johnson TR. Cervical and cranial computed tomographic angiography with automated bone removal: dual energy computed tomography versus standard computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2009; 44: 293–7. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31819b6fba [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Deng K, Liu C, Ma R, Sun C, Wang XM, Ma ZT, et al. Clinical evaluation of dual-energy bone removal in CT angiography of the head and neck: comparison with conventional bone subtraction CT angiography. Clin Radiol 2009; 64: 534–41. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003; 227: 522–8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272012071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Biffi WL, Cothren CC, Moore EE. Western Trauma Association clinical decisions in trauma: screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries. J Trauma 2009; 67: 1150–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Marshall LF, Gautille T, Klauber MR, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, Luerssen TG, et al. The outcome of severe closed head injury. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: S28–36. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rimel RW, Giordani B, Barth JT, Jane JA. Moderate head injury: completing the clinical spectrum of brain trauma. Neurosurgery 1982; 11: 344–51. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198209000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, van Berkum Clark M, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, et al. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: S14–20. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Maas AI, Hukkelhoven CW, Marshall LF, Steyerberg EW. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery 2005; 57: 1173–82. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000186013.63046.6B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Raj R, Siironen J, Skrifvars MB, Hernesniemi J, Kivisaari R. Predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury: development of a novel computerized tomography classification system (Helsinki computerized tomography score). Neurosurgery 2014; 75: 632–46. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Baugnon KL, Hudgins PA. Skull base fractures and their complications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014; 24: 439–65. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2014.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Resnick DK, Subach BR, Marion DW. The significance of carotid canal involvement in basilar fracture. Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 1177–81. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199706000-00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Soto JA, Lucey BC, Stuhlfaut JW, Varghese JC. Use of 3D imaging in CT of the acute trauma patient: impact of a PACS-based software package. Emerg Radiol 2005; 11: 173–6. doi: 10.1007/s10140-004-0384-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hardman JM, Manoukian A. Pathology of head trauma. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 2002; 12: 175–87. doi: 10.1016/S1052-5149(02)00009-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Macpherson BC, Macpherson P, Jennett B. CT evidence of intracranial contusion and haematoma in relation to the presence, site and type of skull fracture. Clin Radiol 1990; 42: 321–6. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)82145-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ishman SL, Friedland DR. Temporal bone fractures: traditional classification and clinical relevance. Laryngoscope 2004; 114: 1734–41. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200410000-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dahiya R, Keller JD, Litofsky NS, Bankey PE, Bonassar LJ, Megerian CA. Temporal bone fractures: otic capsule sparing versus otic capsule violating clinical and radiographic considerations. J Trauma 1999; 47: 1079–83. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199912000-00014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Little SC, Kesser BW. Radiographic classification of temporal bone fractures: clinical predictability using a new system. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 132: 1300–4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.12.1300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Baykaner K, Alp H, Ceviker N, Keskil S, Seçkin Z. Observation of 95 patients with extradural hematoma and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 1988; 30: 339–41. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(88)90195-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cordobés F, Lobato RD, Rivas JJ, Muñoz MJ, Chillon D, Portillo JM, et al. Observations on 82 patients with extradural hematoma. Comparison of results before and after the advent of computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1981; 54: 179–86. doi: 10.3171/jns.1981.54.2.0179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Freytag E. Autopsy findings in head injuries from blunt forces: statistical evaluation of 1,367 cases. Arch Pathol 1963; 75: 402–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Galbraith SL. Age-distribution of extradural haemorrhage without skull fracture. Lancet 1973; 1: 1217–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(73)90529-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rivas JJ, Lobato RD, Sarabia R, Cordobés F, Cabrera A, Gomez P. Extradural hematoma: analysis of factors influencing the courses of 161 patients. Neurosurgery 1988; 23: 44–51. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198807000-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zimmerman RA, Bilanuk IT. Computed tomographic staging of traumatic epidural bleeding. Radiology 1982; 144: 809–12. doi: 10.1148/radiology.144.4.7111729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Oertel M, Kelly DF, McArthur D, Boscardin WJ, Glenn TC, Lee JH, et al. Progressive hemorrhage after head trauma: predictors and consequences of the evolving injury. J Neurosurg 2002; 96: 109–16. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.1.0109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Piepmeier JM, Wagner FC, Jr. Delayed posttraumatic extracerebral hematomas. J Trauma 1982; 22: 455–60. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198206000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yang XF, Wen L, Shen F, Li G, Lou R, Liu WG, et al. Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008; 150: 1241–7. doi: 10.1007/s00701-008-0145-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Milo R, Razon N, Schiffer J. Delayed epidural hematoma. A review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1987; 84: 13–23. doi: 10.1007/BF01456345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell D, et al. Surgical management of acute subdural hematomas. Neurosurgery 2006; 58: 16–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE. Biomechanics of acute subdural hematoma. J Trauma 1982; 22: 680–6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198208000-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zumkeller M, Behrmann R, Heissler HE, Dietz H. Computed tomography criteria and survival rate for patients with acute subdural hematoma. Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 708–12. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199610000-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Reed D, Robertson WD, Graeb DA, Lapointe JS, Nugent RA, Woodhurst WB. Acute subdural hematomas: atypical CT findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1986; 7: 417–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Murray GD, Teasdale GM, Braakman R, Cohadon F, Dearden M, Iannotti F, et al. The European Brain Injury Consortium survey of head injuries. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141: 223–36. doi: 10.1007/s007010050292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Matsukawa H, Shinoda M, Fujii M, Takahashi O, Murakata A, Yamamoto D, et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage on computed tomography and corpus callosum injury on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with isolated blunt traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2012; 117: 334–9. doi: 10.3171/2012.5.JNS112318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thomson B. MR imaging of head trauma: review of the distribution and radiopathologic features of traumatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150: 663–72. doi: 10.2214/ajr.150.3.663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Beaumont A, Gennarelli T. CT prediction of contusion evolution after closed head injury: the role of pericontusional edema. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2006; 96: 30–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yamaki T, Hirakawa K, Uequchi T, Tenjin H, Kuboyama T, Nakagawa Y. Chronological evaluation of acute traumatic intracerebral haematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990; 103: 112–15. doi: 10.1007/BF01407516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Graham DI, Gennarelli TA, McIntosh TK. Trauma. In: Graham DI, Lantos PL, eds. Greeenfield's neuropathology. London, UK: Arnold; 2002. pp. 823–98. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Osborn A. Primary effects of CNS trauma. In: Osborn's brain: imaging, pathology, and anatomy. 1st edn. Manitoba, Canada: Amirsys; 2013. pp. 9–49. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bodanapally UK, Sours C, Zhuo J, Shanmuganathan K. Imaging of traumatic brain inury. Radiol Clin North Am 2015; 53: 695–715. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Adams JH, Doyle D, Ford I, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI, McLellan DR. Diffuse axonal injury: definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology 1989; 15: 49–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1989.tb03040.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gentry LR, Godersky LR, Thomson B, Dunn VD. Prospective comparative study of internmediate-field MR and CT in the evaluation of closed head trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150: 673–82. doi: 10.2214/ajr.150.3.673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Carmody RF. Craniocerebral trauma. Vascular injury and parenchymal changes. In: Imaging of the brain. 1st edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2012. pp. 603–25. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Schaefer PW, Huisman TA, Sorensen AG. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in closed head injury: high correlation with initial Glasgow coma scale score and score on modified Rankin scale at discharge. Radiology 2004; 233: 58–66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2323031173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Messe A, Caplain S, Paradot G, Garrigue D, Mineo JF, Soto Ares G, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and white matter lesions at the subacute stage in mild traumatic brain injury with persistent neurobehavioral impairment. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32: 999–1011. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Niogi SN, Mukherjee P, Ghajar J, Johnson C, Kolster RA, Sarkar R, et al. Extent of microstructural white matter injury in postconcussive syndrome correlates with impaired cognitive reaction time: a 3T diffusion tensor imaging study of mild traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 967–73. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Pittella JE, Gusmão SN. Diffuse vascular injury in fatal road traffic accident victims: its relationship to diffuse axonal injury. J Forensic Sci 2003; 48: 626–30. doi: 10.1520/JFS2002244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Iwamura A. Diffuse vascular injury: convergent-type hemorrhage in the supratentorial white matter on susceptibility-weighted images in case of severe traumatic brain damage. Neuroradiology 2012; 54: 335–43. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-0892-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hilton-Jones D, Warlow CP. The causes of stroke in the young. J Neurol 1985; 232: 137–43. doi: 10.1007/BF00313888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Krajewski LP, Hertzer NR. Blunt carotid artery trauma: report of two cases and review of the literature. Ann Surg 1980; 191: 341–6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198003000-00014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Perry MO, Snyder WH, Thal ER. Carotid arteries injuries caused by blunt trauma. Ann Surg 1980; 192: 74–7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198007000-00013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Larsen DW. Traumatic vascular injuries and their management. Neuroimag Clin N Am 2002; 12: 249–69. doi: 10.1016/S1052-5149(02)00006-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kraus RR, Bergstein JM, DeBord JR. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of blunt carotid arterial injuries. Am J Surg 1999; 178: 190–3. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00157-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Schievink WI. Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 898–906. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103223441206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Mokri B. Traumatic dissection of the extracranial internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 1988; 68: 189–97. doi: 10.3171/jns.1988.68.2.0189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Malek AM, Halbach VV, Phatouros CC, Meyers PM, Dowd CF, Higashida RT. Endovascular treatment of a ruptured intracranial dissecting vertebral aneurysm in a kickboxer. J Trauma 2000; 48: 143–5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200001000-00027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Petro GR, Witwer GA, Cacayorin ED, Hodge CJ, Bredenberg CE, Jastremski MS, et al. Spontaneous dissection of the cervical internal carotid artery: correlation of arteriography, CT, and pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 393–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Rodallec MH, Marteau V, Gerber S, Desmottes L, Zins M. Craniocervical arterial dissection: spectrum of imaging findings and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1711–28. doi: 10.1148/rg.286085512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.LeBlang SD, Nunez DB, Rivas LA, Falcone S, Pogson SE. Helical computed tomographic angiography in penetrating neck trauma. Emerg Radiol 1997; 4: 200–6. doi: 10.1007/BF01508171 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Osborn A. Secondary effects and sequelae of CNS trauma. In: Osborn's brain: imaging, pathology, and anatomy. 1st edn. Manitoba, Canada: Amirsys; 2013. pp. 51–72. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Honeybul S, Ho KM, Lind CR, Gillett GR. Decompressive craniotomy for diffuse cerebral swelling after trauma: long-term outcome and ethical considerations. J Trauma 2011; 71: 128–32. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182117b6c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Johnson PL, Eckard DA, Chason DP, Brecheisen MA, Batnitzky S. Imaging of acquired cerebral herniations. Neuroimag Clin N Am 2002; 12: 217–28. doi: 10.1016/S1052-5149(02)00008-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Plum F, Posner JB. The diagnosis of stupor and coma. 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis; 1980. [Google Scholar]
- 101.Kernohan JW, Woltman HW. Incisura of the crus due to contralateral brain tumor. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1929; 21: 274–87. doi: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1929.02210200030004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Thompson RK, Scalman M. Brainstem hemorrhages: historical perspective. Neurosurgery 1988; 22: 623–8. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198804000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Marino R, Gasparotti R, Pinelli L, Manzoni D, Gritti P, Mardighian D, et al. Post-traumatic cerebral infarction in patients with moderate or severe head trauma. Neurology 2006; 67: 1165–71. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238081.35281.b5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]












