Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients have a poor prognosis, with invasion and metastasis as major causes of mortality. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway regulates a wide range of cellular processes crucial for tumorigenesis, and PIK3CA amplification and mutation are among the most common genetic alterations in human HNSCC. Compared to the well-documented roles of the PI3K pathway in cell growth and survival, the roles of the PI3K pathway in tumor invasion and metastasis have not been well delineated. We generated a PIK3CA-genetically engineered mouse model (PIK3CA-GEMM) in which wildtype PIK3CA is overexpressed in head and neck epithelium. Although PIK3CA overexpression alone was not sufficient to initiate HNSCC formation, it significantly increased tumor susceptibility in an oral-carcinogenesis mouse model. PIK3CA overexpression in mouse oral epithelium increased tumor invasiveness and metastasis by increasing epithelial-mesenchymal transition and by enriching a cancer stem cell phenotype in tumor epithelial cells. In addition to these epithelial alterations, we also observed marked inflammation in tumor stroma. AKT is a central signaling mediator of the PI3K pathway. However, molecular analysis suggested that progression of PIK3CA-driven HNSCC is facilitated by PDK1 and enhanced TGFβ signaling rather than by AKT. Examination of human HNSCC clinical samples revealed that both PIK3CA and PDK1 protein levels correlated with tumor progression, highlighting the significance of this pathway. In summary, our results offer significant insight into how PIK3CA-overexpression drives HNSCC invasion and metastasis, providing a rationale for targeting PI3K/PDK1 and TGFβ signaling in advanced HNSCC patients with PIK3CA amplification.
Keywords: HNSCC, invasion and metastasis, PIK3CA, EMT, cancer stem cell, genetically engineered mouse model
Introduction
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, with 650,000 new cases and 350,000 deaths every year.1 There are 55,000 new cases and over 15,000 deaths from HNSCC annually in the U.S.2 The most common etiological factors for HNSCC are tobacco exposure, alcohol, and human papilloma virus infection3. Although tremendous efforts have been made to improve the treatment for HNSCC patients, HNSCC remains a lethal disease, with 5-year survival rates below 50%, a number that has not significantly changed in several decades.2 Locoregional invasion, recurrence, and metastasis are largely responsible for the poor prognosis of HNSCC patients. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms for HNSCC progression are still poorly understood.
The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway is a key mediator of cell survival, growth, and metabolism, and is commonly altered in many human malignancies, including HNSCC.4–6 The PI3K family is comprised of three subclasses of lipid kinases. Class IA PI3K, composed of a heterodimer between a p110 catalytic subunit and a p85 regulatory subunit, has been intensively studied and demonstrated to be commonly altered in human cancers.4,5 PI3K phosphorylates phosphotidylinositol-4,5,bisphosphate (PIP2) to phosphotidylinositol-3,4,5,trisphosphate (PIP3), a reaction which is antagonized by the tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). In turn, PIP3 binds a subset of pleckstrin homology domain-containing proteins, including AKT and 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase (PDK1). AKT is activated by phosphorylation on serine 473 by the mTORC2 complex, and on threonine 308 by PDK1. Activated AKT directly regulates multiple downstream molecules, such as mTORC1 and p70-S6, to transduce the major downstream PI3K signal pathway.4,5 However, it has been shown that, in certain contexts, PI3K signaling and AKT activation can be uncoupled.7–9
Recent exome sequencing in human HNSCC samples revealed that molecular alterations in the PI3K pathway are the most common genetic changes in HNSCC patients’ cells.10–12 Among those changes, PIK3CA, the gene coding for the p110α catalytic subunit of PI3K, is most frequently altered through either gene amplification or gain-of-function mutations.10–12 Over 40% of HNSCC cases exhibit PIK3CA amplification, and about 10% harbor PIK3CA gain-of-function mutations.4–6,10–13 Although several studies suggest PIK3CA alterations correlate with advanced HNSCC stage,10,14,15 vascular invasion,16 and lymph node metastasis,17 there are no in vivo studies that have elucidated the mechanisms by which PIK3CA alterations lead to HNSCC development and progression.
To address this, we generated an inducible head-and-neck specific genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM), in which PIK3CA is overexpressed in head and neck epithelium. Our results showed that in this GEMM overexpression of PIK3CA alone resulted in head and neck epithelial hyperplasia but was not sufficient to initiate tumorigenesis. However, overexpression of PIK3CA significantly increased susceptibility to oral carcinogen-induced head and neck tumorigenesis. Strikingly, PIK3CA overexpression promoted HNSCC invasion and metastasis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and enrichment of putative head-and-neck cancer stem cells (CSCs). Further molecular studies showed that activation of PDK1 and enhanced TGFβ signaling play an important part in HNSCC progression. Our findings highlight the key role of PDK1 and TGFβ signaling in HNSCC invasion and metastasis, and suggest that targeting PDK1 and TGFβ signaling may be effective approaches to controlling HNSCC progression, particularly in patients with PIK3CA gene amplification.
Results
Overexpression of PIK3CA in murine head and neck epithelia resulted in increased susceptibility to head and neck carcinogenesis
Although PIK3CA amplification/mutation has been described in human HNSCC, little is known about its in vivo role during head and neck tumorigenesis. To this end, we developed an inducible, head-and-neck specific PIK3CA genetically engineered mouse model (PIK3CA-GEMM) using previously published methods.18 Briefly, the PIK3CA-GEMM consists a transactivator mouse line (K5.GLp65) and a target mouse line (tata.PIK3CA) (Figure 1a). In the transactivator line, the keratin 5 (K5) promoter is used to restrict expression of the GLp65 fusion protein to the basal layer of stratified epithelia (e.g. buccal mucosa, tongue). GLp65 consists of a GAL4 DNA binding domain, the NF-κB p65 transactivation domain, and an RU486-inducible truncated progesterone receptor ligand binding domain (ΔPR-LBD). The K5.GLp65 mice were bred to the tata.PIK3CA mice to generate the bigenic K5.GLp65/tataPIK3CA (hereafter referred to as PIK3CA-GEMM). The monogenic K5.GLp65 and tata.PIK3CA mouse lines were used as experimental controls. Starting at four week of age, mice were orally treated with RU486 dissolved in sesame oil. As shown in Figure 1b, upon RU486 application, the expression level of PIK3CA mRNA increased about 8–10 fold in the buccal mucusa and tongue tissues from the PIK3CA-GEMM compared to those from the control mice or the PIK3CA-GEMM without RU486 application. Correspondingly, the protein level of p110α (encoded by the PIK3CA gene) was also increased in PIK3CA-GEMM head and neck tissues upon RU486 application (Figure 1c).
Figure 1. Generation and characterization of the inducible, head and neck-specific PIK3CA genetically engineered mouse model (PIK3CA-GEMM).
(a) Schematic of generating the PIK3CA-GEMM by breeding the transactivator mouse line K5.GLp65 to the target mouse line tata.PIK3CA.
(b) Fold inductions of the PIK3CA mRNA quantified by qRT-PCR using transgene specific primers. RU=RU486, n=6, *p<0.05.
(c) Western blot analysis on protein lysates from the buccal mucosa and tongue of the PIK3CA-GEMMs.
After verifying induced expression of PIK3CA in the PIK3CA-GEMM head and neck epithelia following RU486 administration, we treated PIK3CA-GEMMs with oral RU486 (20 μg/mouse) twice weekly. Epithelial hyperplasia and carcinoma in situ with increased cell proliferation were observed in both buccal mucosa and tongue tissue as early as six months after initiation of treatment (Supplementary Figure S1). However, these premalignant lesions failed to progress into squamous cell carcinomas, suggesting that PIK3CA overexpression alone is not sufficient to induce HNSCC formation.
One of the major etiological factors of human HNSCC development is tobacco exposure.3 To mimic this human situation and investigate the interaction between environmental factors and genetic susceptibility, we applied the 4NQO-induced HNSCC carcinogenesis protocol to the PIK3CA-GEMM. 4NQO is a DNA adduct-forming agent widely used as a tobacco surrogate to induce HNSCC in mouse models.19 As shown in Figure 2a, PIK3CA-GEMM and control mice were treated with RU486 applied orally twice weekly and with 4NQO added to drinking water (50 μg/ml) starting when the mice were one month old. Mice were exposed to 4NQO for 16 weeks, and received RU486 through the end of the 12 month experiment. PIK3CA overexpression significantly enhanced susceptibility to 4NQO-induced head and neck carcinogenesis (Figure 2b). By 5–6 months of age, 39% of PIK3CA-GEMMs developed HNSCC, compared to only 8% of control mice (p<0.01). By 10–12 months, all 4NQO-treated control and PIK3CA-GEMM mice developed HNSCC. The authentication of the PIK3CA tumors was validated by transgene-specific genotyping PCR (Supplementary Figure S2). By the time of tumor harvest, there were no differences in the general health and nutritional status (e.g. activity or body weight) between the control mice and the PIK3CA-GEMMs.
Figure 2. Overexpression of PIK3CA together with 4NQO treatment increases tumor susceptibility and promotes tumor invasion and metastasis of the 4NQO-induced HNSCC.
(a) Schematics of the animal experiment. Starting at one month of age, PIK3CA-GEMMs and control mice were given 4NQO (50 μg/ml) in the drinking water for 16 weeks, and RU486 (20 μg/mouse) applied orally twice weekly until harvesting mice at 12 months.
(b) Summary of tumor incidences in the PIK3CA-GEMMs and control mice. All mice underwent a biweekly full oral cavity examination, and any pathologic changes were documented. Tumor onset was significantly earlier for the PIK3CA-GEMMs (5–6 months) than for the control mice. *p<0.01
(c) Gross morphology of tongue SCCs from control mice (upper) and PIK3CA-GEMMs (lower). Dotted lines delineate the tumor boundary. Note that tumors from the control mice are papilloma-like, while those from the PIK3CA-GEMMs are flat.
(d) H&E staining of representative tongue tumors shows that tumors from control mice have an out-growth pattern with intact basement membrane (upper left panel), and are well-differentiated (lower left panel), while tumors from the PIK3CA-GEMMs have a down-growth pattern, with invasion to the tongue muscle (upper right panel), and are poorly-differentiated (lower right panel). Scale bar: 100 μm for upper panel, and 25 μm for lower panel.
(e) Histopathological summary of oral tumors from control mice and PIK3CA-GEMMs. Poorly: poorly differentiated tumors; Mod: moderately differentiated tumors; Well: well differentiated tumors; CIS: carcinoma in situ.
(f) H&E staining of representative lymph node and lung metastases. Dotted line delineates the upper boundary of the tumor. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Overexpression of PIK3CA in murine head and neck epithelia promotes tumor invasion and metastasis
It was immediately clear that tumors from PIK3CA-GEMMs and those from control mice differed in gross appearance: while most control tumors were papillomatous, tumors from the PIK3CA-GEMMs were flat (Figure 2c). Histologically, the majority of the control tumors had an out-growth pattern with intact basement membranes (left panels of Figure 2d and Supplementary Figure S3), while tumors from the PIK3CA-GEMMs predominantly had a down-growth pattern with broken basement membranes and invasion into muscle (right panels of Figure 2d and Supplementary Figure S3). While over 60% of the control tumors were well-differentiated or carcinoma in situ, over 50% of the PIK3CA-overexpressing tumors were poorly-differentiated as confirmed by a head and neck pathologist (Figure 2d, 2e, Supplementary Figure S3). Notably, metastases were observed in ~40% of the PIK3CA-GEMMs (regional lymph node or lung metastases) compared to no metastases in control mice (Figure 2f). These data showed that overexpression of PIK3CA promoted 4NQO-induced HNSCC progression, particularly tumor invasion and metastasis.
PIK3CA overexpression induced de-differentiation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and enriched cancer stem cell properties
The poorly differentiated tumor histology observed in the PIK3CA-GEMMs was further confirmed by immunostaining of several differentiation markers. As shown in Figure 3a, while Keratin 1 (K1, green) was still retained in the control tumors, marking well-differentiated SCC, it was lost in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors. In contrast, Keratin 8 (K8, red), seen in poorly-differentiated SCC, was rarely expressed in control tumors, whereas it was highly expressed in tumors from PIK3CA-GEMMs. This differential keratin expression was further confirmed by K1 and K8 mRNA expression quantified by qPCR (Figure 3b). In addition to these findings, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) was observed in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors. As shown in Figure 3c, in contrast to the universal expression of the epithelial marker E-cadherin (green) in control tumors, E-cadherin expression was lost in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors. Conversely, the mesenchymal marker Vimentin (red) was expressed only in the stroma of the control tumors, but was expressed in the epithelium of PIK3CA-GEMM tumors, suggesting that EMT had taken place. This was further confirmed by qPCR showing decreased E-cadharin and increased Vimentin mRNA expression in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors (Figure 3d). Lastly, relative to controls, the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors showed significantly increased expression of several transcription factors regulating EMT, including Twist1, Zeb1, Zeb2 and Snail1 (Figure 3e). Thus, the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors exhibited both histopathological and molecular signature of EMT.
Figure 3. PIK3CA overexpression in tumor tissue promotes cellular de-differentiation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and enrichment of cancer stem cell properties.
(a) Double immunofluorescence (IF) staining of keratin 1 (K1, green) and keratin 8 (K8, red) markers on tongue tumor samples from control mice and PIK3CA-GEMMs (n=7). K1 indicates well-differentiated cells, while K8 indicates poorly-differentiated cells. Scale bar: 25 μm.
(b) Relative mRNA levels of K1 and K8 measured by qRT-PCR, normalized to β-actin. Results are averages of triplicate experiments. *p<0.05 (n=6 for each group).
(c) Double IF staining of epithelial marker E-cadherin (green) and mesenchymal marker Vimentin (red) on tongue tumor samples from control mice and PIK3CA-GEMMs (n=12). Scale bar: 25 μm.
(d) Relative mRNA levels of E-cadherin and Vimentin measured by qRT-PCR, normalized to β-actin. Results are averages of triplicate experiments. *p<0.05 (n=6 for each group).
(e) Relative mRNA levels of EMT-related molecules measured by qRT-PCR, normalized to β-actin. Results are averages of triplicate experiments. *p<0.05 (n=6 for each group).
(f) Relative mRNA levels of putative markers for cancer stem cell of HNSCC (left panel) and molecules regulating CSC phenotype (right panel) measured by qRT-PCR. Results are averages of triplicate experiments. *p<0.05 (n=6 for each group).
It has been shown that de-differentiation and EMT correlate with enhanced cancer stem cell (CSC)/progenitor activity.20 We thus examined putative CSC markers of HNSCC by qPCR. As shown in Figure 3f, overexpression of PIK3CA significantly increased mRNA expression of CD44 and CD166, and reduced expression of CD24, all of which indicate an enhanced CSC phenotype. This result is further supported by increased mRNA expression of embronic stem cell markers Nanog, Oct4 and EZH2. Interestingly, increased expression of Wnt5a, which is implicated in migration/invasion, was also found in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors (Figure 3f).
PIK3CA-GEMM tumors have increased PDK1 expression and activation
To investigate the molecular mechanisms of PIK3CA-driven HNSCC progression, we examined several key molecules in the PI3K pathway. It has been shown that the change of mRNA expression ratio between AKT1 and AKT2 regulates EMT in breast cancer cells.21 However, there were no significant changes of mRNA expression of AKT1, AKT2, PDK1 or PTEN in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors compared to control tumors (Figure 4a). AKT1 and AKT2 protein levels were similar between control and PIK3CA-GEMM tumors. However, PDK1 protein levels were increased in PIK3CA-GEMM tumors (Supplementary Figure S4). We then examined AKT and PDK1 protein activation by Western blotting. Surprisingly, we did not detect significant differences in AKT phosphorylation at either Ser473 or Thr308 between the control and the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors. However, PDK1 activation by phosphorylation at Ser241 was significantly enhanced in PIK3CA-GEMM tumors (Figure 4b). Similarly, IHC staining showed an increase of total PDK1 protein in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors (Figure 4c). These findings were unexpected and suggested that PDK1 may mediate oncogenic signaling in PIK3CA-driven HNSCC progression. Lastly, we examined several molecules which are commonly altered in human HNSCCs. 4NQO exposure causes the formation of DNA adducts, resulting in mutations.19 We first examined two oncogenes that are commonly mutated in HNSCC, i.e. Ras and PIK3CA. We sequenced eight PIK3CA-GEMM tumors and eight control tumors for mutations at codons 12, 13 and 61 of the K-ras and H-ras genes, and exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene. The only mutation we found was a G to A point mutation in codon 12 of mouse K-ras gene, which changes glutamic acid to aspartic acid (Supplementary Figure S5). This mutation was found only in one control tumor. We then examined the mRNA levels of p16, EGFR, Stat3, CyclinD1, K-ras, H-ras and N-ras in PIK3CA-GEMM and control tumors. We found increased Stat3 and decreased p16 mRNA in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors compared to control tumors (Figure 4d).
Figure 4. Overexpression and activation of PDK1 but not AKT in PIK3CA-GEMM tumors.
(a) Relative mRNA levels of PIK3CA, AKT1, AKT2, PDK1 and PTEN measured by qRT-PCR. Results are averages of triplicate experiment. *p<0.05 (n=6 for each group).
(b) Western blotting analysis of tumor samples from control mice and PIK3CA-GEMMs using the antibodies as indicated.
(c) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of p110α, pAKTser473 and PDK1 in tumors from PIK3CA-GEMMs and control mice. Scale bar: 50 μM
(d) qRT-PCR examination of mRNA levels of molecules commonly altered in human HNSCCs. Results are averages of triplicate experiments. *p<0.05 (n=6 for each group).
(e) Relative mRNA levels of PDK1, E-cadherin, and Vimentin in CU110 cells with PDK1 knockdown (CU110-shPDK1) or with a scramble control (CU110-SCR) measured by qRT-PCR. *p<0.05.
(f) Cell proliferation assay of CU110-shPDK1 and CU110-SCR measured by the Cell Counting Kit-8. *p<0.05.
(g) Migration assay in CU110-shPDK1 and CU110-SCR cells. Dotted line defines the edges of cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate. *p<0.05.
(h) Invasion assay in CU110-SHPDK1 and CU110-SCR cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate. *p<0.05.
To further examine whether PDK1 is involved in the tumor progression of the PIK3CA-GEMM mice, we cultured primary tumor cells from both PIK3CA-GEMM tumors (CU110 cells) and control tumors (CUCON cells). As shown in the Supplementary Figure S6A, consistent with the EMT changes in the tumor tissues, CU110 cells were more spindle-like, while CUCON cells were more round and epithelial-like. Overexpression of p110α was observed in the CU110 cells compared to that in CUCON cells (Figure 6e, left panel). We then stablely knocked down PDK1 in the CU110 cells (CU110-shPDK1), along with CU110 cells with a scramble insert (CU110-SCR) as a control (Figure 4e and Supplementary Figure S6B). Knocking down PDK1 in the CU110 cells increased E-cadherin expression and decreased Vimention expression (Figure 4e), but had no effects on phosphorylations of Smad2 or Smad3 (Supplementary Figure S6B). In addition, knocking down PDK1 (CU110-shPDK1) significanly reduced cell proliferation compared to the control cells (CU110-SCR) (Figure 4f). Moreover, knocking down PDK1 in the CU110 cells moderately attenuated cell migration (Figure 4g) and invasion (Figure 4h) abilities. These data suggested that PDK1 contributed to the tumor progression phenotypes observed in the PIK3CA-overexpression HNSCCs.
Figure 6. Increased TGFβ ligand and smad3 expression and activation in tumors from PIK3CA-GEMMs.
(a) qRT-PCR examination of molecules in the TGFβ signaling pathway. *p<0.05 (n=6 for each group).
(b) ELISA quantification of TGFβ1 ligand (n=5)
(c) Double IF staining of epithelial marker E-cadherin (green) and Smad3 (red). Note the inverse correlation between Smad3 and E-cadherin in control and PIK3CA-GEMM tumors. (n=4), scale bar: 25 μm.
(d) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated Smad3.
(e) Western blot analysis of p110α in cells cultured from a 4NQO-induced control tumor (CUCON) and a 4NQO-induced PIK3CA-GEMM tumor (CU110), and CU110 cells with either a PIK3CA knock-down (sh-PIK3CA), or a scramble control (SCR).
(f) qRT-PCR examination of TGFβ1 mRNA levels in CUCON and CU110 cells (left panel), and CU110 cells with PIK3CA knock-down (sh-PIK3CA) or scramble control (SCR) (right panel). *p<0.05.
(g) Western blot analysis of phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 in CU110 cells treated with a TGFβ type I receptor inhibitor, LY2157299, or DMSO (control).
(h) Migration assay in CU110 cells treated with a TGFβ type I receptor inhibitor, LY2157299, or DMSO (control). Dotted line defines the edges of cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate. *p<0.05.
(i) Invasion assay in CU110 cells treated with a TGFβ type I receptor inhibitor, LY2157299, or DMSO (control). All experiments were performed in triplicate. *p<0.05.
PIK3CA overexpression led to increased inflammation in HNSCC tumor stroma
In addition to the de-differentiation and EMT changes in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumor cells, we observed numerous infiltrated leukocytes in the stroma of the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors on histological sections examined by HE staining (Supplementary Figure S7) and IHC with CD45 (Figure 5a). We then examined subtypes of infiltrated leukocytes using IHC. Tumor-associated macrophages are stained by F4/80 antibody, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in a tumor microenvironment are stained by granulocyte markers Gr1 and CD11b.22 Both cell types were increased in PIK3CA-GEMM tumors compared to control tumors (Figure 5a). Lastly, we evaluated which cancer-associated inflammatory cytokines were up-regulated in PIK3CA-GEMM tumors. Among the fifteen inflammatory chemokines/receptors we evaluated, mRNA levels of CCL3, CCR7, CXCL12 and CXCR4 were all significantly increased in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors compared to the control tumors (Figure 5b).
Figure 5. Increased leukocyte infiltration and inflammation in tumors from PIK3CA-GEMMs.
(a) Detection of leukocyte subtypes in tumors from PIK3CA-GEMMs and control mice using IHC with CD45, F4/80, Gr1, and CD11b. Scale bar: 50 μM.
(b) qRT-PCR examination of inflammatory-related cytokines/chemokines and receptors. Results are averages of triplicate experiments. *p<0.05 (n=6 for each group).
PIK3CA-GEMM tumors have increased TGFβ1 ligand, and increased Smad3 expression and activation
The EMT change in tumor cells and the enhanced leukocyte infiltration in PIK3CA-GEMM tumors are similar to what we observed previously in HNSCC mouse models with aberrant TGFβ signaling.18,23,24 This prompted us to further investigate whether TGFβ signaling contributes to PIK3CA-driven HNSCC progression. We first used qRT-PCR to examine several TGFβ signaling pathway molecules known to be altered in human cancers. We found that mRNA levels of TGFβ1 and Smad3 were significantly higher in PIK3CA-GEMM tumor tissues than in control tumor tissues (Figure 6a). TGFβ1 protein level was also increased in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumor tissues, as determined by ELISA (Figure 6b). We then performed double IF of Smad3 and the epithelial marker E-cadherin. As shown in Figure 6c, the Smad3 positive area was inversely correlated with E-cadherin positive staining, suggesting that Smad3 may contribute to the EMT changes in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors. Increased phosphorylation of Smad3 in the PIK3CA-GEMM tumors compared to the control tumor tissues was also observed through Western blot analysis (Figure 6d).
To further assess the role of TGFβ signaling in mediating the tumor promoting effects of PIK3CA overexpression, we created CU110 cells in which the PIK3CA gene was knocked down (CU110-shPIK3CA), along with CU110 cells with a scramble insert (CU110-SCR) as a control (Figure 6e, right panel). To examine the effect of PIK3CA overexpression or knockdown on TGFβ pathway in the cultured HNSCC cells to check whether PIK3CA-mediated regulation of TGFβ pathway is cell autonomous in cancer cells, we compared TGFβ1 mRNA levels in CUCON, CU110, CU110-shPIK3CA, and CU110-SCR cells. As shown in Figure 6f, TGFβ mRNA levels in the CU110 cells were about four times that in the CUCON cells. Conversely, knocking down PIK3CA significantly reduced TGFβ1 mRNA levels in CU110-shPIK3CA cells compared to the CU110-SCR cells, suggesting that the PIK3CA-mediated regulation of TGFβ pathway is cell autonomous in cancer cells. Lastly, we treated the PIK3CA-overexpressing CU110 cells with a TGFβ type I receptor kinase inhibitor, LY2157299, to address the contribution of TGFβ pathway to the PIK3CA-driven HNSCC progression. Treatment with LY2157288 effectively reduced Smad2 and Smad3 phosphorylation, indicating the effectiveness of the inhibition of the TGFβ signaling pathway (Figure 6g). Following the treatment, both cell migration and invasion were significantly hampered (Figure 6h and i), with a minor effect on cell proliferation (Supplementary Figure 6C), indicating that the TGFβ pathway contributes to migration and invasion of PIK3CA-driven HNSCC tumorigenesis.
PIK3CA and PDK1 are associated with progression in human HNSCC
To address the clinical relevance of our results from the PIK3CA-GEMM, we examined PIK3CA, PDK1, and pAKT expression in primary human HNSCC samples, case-matched adjacent mucosa, and metastatic lesions, compared to normal oropharyngeal samples from patients with sleep apnea as controls. We first performed qRT-PCR to measure PIK3CA mRNA levels. Compared to normal controls, PIK3CA mRNA was increased in both adjacent mucosa and HNSCC samples (Figure 7a). Interestingly, increased PIK3CA expression positively correlated with reduced tumor differentiation and increased lymph node metastasis (Figure 7a). We then carried out IHC staining of p110α, PDK1, and pAKT. Figure 7b summarizes the percentage of cases with immunostaining ≥2+ in HNSCC tumors and metastases. Consistent with PIK3CA qRT-PCR results, we found increased p110α immunostaining both in poorly-differentiated HNSCCs and in metastases (Figures 7b and c). Interestingly, PDK1 expression positively correlated with PIK3CA expression and advanced disease (Figures 7b and c). However, AKT activation showed the opposite pattern, and demonstrated reduced expression in poorly-differentiated tumors and metastases compared to early stage lesions. These data from human tissue sample support our mouse model data that PIK3CA-driven HNSCC progression is predominantly mediated through PDK1, but not through AKT.
Figure 7. PIK3CA, PDK1 and pAKT alterations in human HNSCCs.
(a) qRT-PCR quantitation of PIK3CA mRNA expression in human HNSCCs. Error bars indicate mean±SD. *p<0.05. NN: Normal controls; Adj: adjacent mucosa; Well: well differentiated tumors; Mod: moderately differentiated tumors; Poorly: poorly differentiated tumors; LN mets: Lymph node metastases.
(b) Percentage of human HNSCC cases which exhibited ≥2+ IHC staining of p110α, PDK1, and pAKT. Well: well differentiated tumors; Mod: moderately differentiated tumors; Poorly: poorly differentiated tumors; LN mets: Lymph node metastases. *p<0.05.
(c) IHC staining of serial sections of a poorly differentiated HNSCC. Scale bar: 50 μm.
Discussion
Previous mouse models were generated by knocking in PIK3CA mutant H1047 into different tissue contexts.25–29 However, somatic mutations of PIK3CA are infrequent (~10%) compared to PIK3CA gene amplification (~40%) in HNSCC patients.4,5 Thus, our PIK3CA-GEMM, in which the wild type PIK3CA is overexpressed specifically in murine head and neck epithelium, more closely mimics the majority of human HNSCC patients. Since this transgene can be induced in a spatio-temporal manner, our model is an ideal platform to assess the role of PIK3CA overexpression at each stage of HNSCC tumorigenesis. This also represents the first GEMM in head and neck tissue for studying the in vivo role of PIK3CA.
In the PIK3CA-GEMM we found that PIK3CA overexpression alone is not sufficient to initiate tumor formation in head and neck tissue. This is in contrast to the results of tumor formation in breast and lung cancer mouse models25–27. One explanation is that previous mouse models were based on gene mutations compared to our model which is based on gene overexpression; these two types of gene alterations may play distinct roles in tumorigenesis. The other possibility is that PIK3CA may have a context-specific role in tumorigenesis. For example, the same mutant PIK3CA-H1047 that causes spontaneous breast and lung tumor formation is not sufficient to initiate tumor formation in ovarian or colon tissues unless coupled with either a PTEN or APC deletion.28,29 Our data suggest that PIK3CA overexpression may not initiate tumorigenesis, but instead it promotes tumor progression in HNSCC.
Compared to the well-documented mitogenic signaling of PI3K in cell growth and survival, the role of PI3K in tumor invasion and metastasis has not been well delineated. In a subset of aggressive breast cancer which exhibits EMT and CSC characteristics, the authors found the mutation rate of PIK3CA reached nearly 50%, significantly higher than in any other types of breast cancer.30 Knocking in the PIK3CA mutant into a breast cancer cell line also resulted in an EMT phenotype.31 In line with these data, our PIK3CA-GEMM provides the first in vivo evidence that PIK3CA alteration is able to drive tumor progression at least partially through enriched EMT and CSC characteristics, which may be responsible for the invasive and metastatic phenotype observed in the PIK3CA-GEMM.
AKT is largely regarded as the dominant mediator of oncogenic PI3K signaling.4 However, studies suggest that the link between PI3K and AKT can be uncoupled.7,8,32,33 Recent reports showed that AKT can directly phosphorylate Twist1 to promote EMT,34 and that the ratio of AKT1 and AKT2 and its regulated microRNAs are responsible for EMT and CSCs.21 However, we found no differences in AKT activation or expression of AKT isoforms between control and PIK3CA-GEMM tumors. Lack of AKT activation has also been observed in subset of PIK3CA mutated breast cancer,8 PTEN-null lung cancers,35 and BRAF-initiated melanoma.9 AKT activation can be detected in mouse models as early as pre-neoplastic lesions upon either 4NQO36 or NNK treatment,37 and AKT activation in the oral cavity can initiate benign tumor formation. However, it fails to promote tumor progression unless combined with p53 loss,38 suggesting that AKT activation may be involved in early events in HNSCC carcinogenesis, but not in tumor progression. In some breast cancers with PIK3CA mutations, PDK1, but not AKT, is activated.8 Similarly, our results suggest that PDK1, rather than AKT, facilitates progression of PI3K-driven HNSCC, which raises the possibility of PDK1 as a therapeutic target in HNSCC patients with PIK3CA alterations.
PDK1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase that phosphorylates members of the AGC kinase superfamily, including AKT, and is implicated in cell proliferation, survival and metabolism.39 Interestingly, PDK1 has been shown to regulate cell migration but not proliferation in lymphocytes,40 and to promote EMT in cardiac development.41 Compared to the extensive research into AKT, less is known about the role of PDK1 in human cancers. Overexpression of PDK1 has been reported in several human cancers,42–44 and correlates with disease progression in patients with pancreatic cancer or melanoma.43,44 Interestingly, PDK1 is required for Kras-driven pancreatic cancer in murine models but not for the Kras-driven lung cancer, suggesting a context-specific role of PDK1.45 In HNSCC, PDK1 has been shown to mediate G-protein-coupled receptor and EGFR cross-talk as well as cell growth, both in vitro and in vivo.46 It has become evident recently that the role of PDK1 in physiological and pathological conditions is not limited to AKT activation; it may also evoke other signaling for tumorigenesis. For example, PDK1 has been shown to activate SGK3 in a PI3K-dependent, AKT-independent fashion in breast cancer.8 PDK1 can also directly activate PLCγ1 to mediate cancer cell invasion.47 Moreover, PDK1 directly phosphorylates polo-like kinase 1 (PLK-1) to induce an embryonic stem cell-like gene signature associated with aggressive tumor behaviors and CSC self-renewal.48 Further investigation on the downstream molecular mechanisms underlying PI3K/PDK1 signaling in the PIK3CA-GEMM will provide important insights into PIK3CA-driven HNSCC progression and identify novel therapeutic targets to control HNSCC progression.
The downstream mechanisms of PI3K/PDK1 in HNSCC invasion and metastasis are largely unknown. In this study, we found that the TGFβ1 ligand and its downstream mediator Smad3 are overexpressed in PIK3CA-GEMM tumor tissues. The positive correlation between PIK3CA and TGFβ1 levels was further detected in both PIK3CA-overexpressing tumor cells and PIK3CA-knockdown tumor cells, suggesting that the PIK3CA-mediated regulation of TGFβ pathway is cell autonomous. The contribution of TGFβ pathway to mediate migration and invasion of PIK3CA-overexpressing tumor cells was validated by treating these cells with a TGFβ pathway inhibitor. Cross talk between PI3K and TGFβ signaling can occur at multiple levels.49 For example, PI3K is able to mediate TGFβ-receptor initiated intracellular signaling.50 Additionally, PI3K can antagonize TGF-β-induced cytostasis and cause the shift in TGFβ signaling to tumor progression.49 However, prior reports on PI3K and TGFβ interplay were almost exclusively related to AKT signaling.49 Thus it remains unclear how PI3K/PDK1 interacts with TGFβ/Smad3 signaling during HNSCC progression.
Currently, the only FDA-approved targeted therapy for HNSCC is EGFR inhibitors.51 Targeting the PI3K pathway represents a promising new strategy for treating HNSCC. The role of PDK1 in mediating invasion and metastasis of PIK3CA-driven HNSCC suggests it may be useful as a therapeutic target. Targeting PDK1 using either genetic approaches or pharmaceutical inhibitors has been shown to inhibit CSC self-renewal and metastasis.44,48,52 In one pre-clinical study on HNSCC, PDK1 inhibition showed anti-tumor effects either by itself or in combination with EGFR inhibition.46 Thus targeting PIK3CA or PDK1 presents an important new avenue for HNSCC treatment. Targeting TGFβ as anti-cancer therapy has been evaluated for a decade in multiple cancers.53 However it remains unclear how it may best be used and such therapies are highly stage- and patient-specific. The possible synergistic role of overactivated PI3K and TGFβ signaling in HNSCC progression demonstrated in this study has prompted testing of combination therapy. If proven effective in preclinical trials with PIK3CA-GEMM, this combination therapy will be immediately translated into clinical trials for treating advanced HNSCC patients who have PIK3CA alterations.
In summary, we report a genetically engineered mouse model which the PIK3CA is overexpressed in head and neck epithelia. Although overexpression of PIK3CA alone is not sufficient to initiate HNSCC formation, it significantly increased the susceptibility to the 4NQO-induced HNSCC carcinogenesis. More importantly, PIK3CA overexpression promotes EMT and CSC properties and drives tumor invasion and metastasis, which is likely mediated by increased PDK1 expression and activation, and subsequent increased TGFβ1 ligand and Smad3 expression and activation. Our study lays the foundation for future investigations into the mechanism of PDK1 and its interplay with TGFβ signaling in PIK3CA-driven HNSCC tumorigenesis. Moreover, it suggests that therapeutic targeting of PDK1 and/or TGFβ signaling may effectively control HNSCC progression, particularly in patients with PIK3CA amplification.
Materials and Methods
Generation and characterization of the inducible head-and-neck specific PIK3CA genetically engineered mouse model
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Cancer and Use Committees of the Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) and University of Colorado School of Medicine. The plasmid containing full length cDNA of PIK3CA (pcDNA3.1-PIK3CA) was obtained from Addgene under the MTA agreement. The PIK3CA fragment was subcloned into the target vector (ptata.A) using the XhoI site (Supplemental Figure S8a). A 3.5 kb HindIII/KpnI fragment including Gal4 binding sites, minimal tata promoter, and the PIK3CA cDNA was microinjected into the pronucleus of single-cell embryo by the transgenic mouse core facility at OHSU. The embryos were implanted into pseudo-pregnant females and allowed to develop to term. PCR genotyping was performed at the three weeks of age using genomic DNA isolated from tail biopsies. Three lines (#5840. #5446, #5703) transmitted the transgene through their germline and was called tata.PIK3CA mouse line thereafter (Supplemental Figure S8b). The transgene specific primers covering HA tag were designed, along upstream sequence. The primers used to detect the ptata.PIK3CA transgene were: Forward: TGAGCAAGAGGCTTTGGAGT and Reverse: TGCATTCTAGTTGTGGTTT.
The target mouse line tata.PIK3CA was then bred to the transactivator mouse line, K5.GLp65, which was developed previously.18 The resulting bigenic mouse line K5.GLp65/tata.PIK3CA is hereafter referred to as PIK3CA genetically engineered mouse model (PIK3CA-GEMM). The PIK3CA-GEMMs were selected by using genotyping primers specific for GLp65 (forward: TGTCAAGGTCTTCTCGAGGA; reverse: GGCCATACACTTGAGTGACA), and the same primers that were used for detection of the PIK3CA transgene (above).
All mouse experiments were performed in a C57BL/6 background. Adult bigenic K5.GLp65/tata.PIK3CA and monogenic K5.GLp65, tata.PIK3CA, and non-transgenic mice (around one month old) were treated with RU486 for PIK3CA gene induction and with the rodent oral carcinogen, 4-nitroquinoline 1 oxide (4NQO). For the transgene induction, 100 μl of RU486, dissolved in sesame oil (0.2 μg/ml), was applied in the oral cavity of mouse to induce either acute or sustained PIK3CA transgene expression as described previously.18 For the oral carcinogenesis experiment, 4NQO (Sigma) was prepared weekly in propylene glycol at a concentration of 5 mg/ml, and was placed into drinking water in a final concentration of 50 μg/ml. The water was changed once weekly, and was given to mice for 16 weeks. The general health condition of mice was monitored twice weekly, and their body weight was measured once weekly. Mice were given softened food when there were signs of food-intake difficulty, or decreased body weight. At the end of animal experiment, mice were euthanized. Buccal mucosa, tongue, lymph node and lung tissues were harvested for histological analysis and immunostaining.
Patients
The clinical study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board-approved of OHSU, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to sample collection. HNSCC and case-matched adjacent tissue samples were surgically resected from consenting patients at the Departments of Otolaryngology and Dermatology of OHSU. Tissues examined in this study include a total of 74 HNSCCs (26 SCCs of tongue, 19 SCCs of oral cavity, three SCCs of nasal pharynx, seven SCCs of oropharynx, seven SCCs of hypopharynx, 12 SCCs of larynx) and case-matched tissues adjacent to tumors, and 24 cases of lymph node metastases. 12 normal oropharyngeal samples from sleep apnea patients were used as normal controls.
Histology and Immunostaining
Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned to 5-μm thickness. Sections were stained with H&E and examined for the presence of hyperplasia, dysplasia, papillomas, carcinomas, and metastases. Tumor pathology and metastasis were examined by at least two investigators and confirmed by the head and neck cancer pathologist (SS). Quantitation of IHC staining of human p110α, pAKT and PDK1 was performed by two independent investigators using methods described previously.54 Double immunofluorescence was performed as previously described.24 Incubation with primary antibodies was as follows: Keratin 1 (K1) (Convance, PRB-165P), K8 (Fitzgerald, 20R-CP004), Ecadherin (cell signaling, #3195), Vimentin (BD Pharmingen, RV202), Smad3 (Novus, 378611). Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously.24 Incubation with primary antibodies was as followings: PDK1 (Abcam, ab52893), CD45 (eBioscience, 14-0451), F4/80 (Serotec, MCA497GA), Gr1 (BD Pharmingen, 550291), CD11b (BD Pharmingen, 550282), p110α (cell signaling, #4249), Ki67 (abcam, ab16667) and pAKTSer473 (cell signaling, #3787). Slides were examined with a Leica microscope, and images were taken using the Q Capture Pro software (Q imaging).
DNA sequencing, RNA isolation and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR)
Genomic DNA isolation from mouse tumor tissues was performed as described previously.23 Exon 1 and exon 2 of mouse H-ras, or K-ras, and exon 9 and exon 20 of mouse PIK3CA were amplified by PCR and sequenced using the sequences listed in Table S1. RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis were performed as described previously.24 cDNAs were subjected to qRT-PCR using either the SYBR mix (Biorad) or the TaqMan Assays-on-Demand probes (Applied Biosystems). qRT-PCR was run on the CFX connect qPCR machine (Biorad). β-actin was used as an internal control. Primer sequences for mouse SYBR qRT-PCR assay are listed in Table S2. Primer sequences for human PIK3CA qRT-PCR are: forward-ACCTGAATAGGCAAGTCGAGGCAA, reverse-ACAGAAAGCCCTGTAGAGCATCCA. Each sample was examined in triplicate. The relative RNA expression levels were determined by normalizing to the internal control, the values of which were calculated using the comparative Ct method.
Protein Analysis
Whole head and neck tissues and tumors tissues were lysed using a homogenizer (Pro Scientific) in lysis buffer (Roche) containing a pellet of protease inhibitor cocktail. Protein concentration was measured using Pierce 660 nm protein assay reagent (Thermo), and 40 μg of protein lysates were analyzed using the standard Western protocol we have described previously.37 Blots were incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight and secondary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature. Western blots were imaged by ECL (Biorad) and normalized with respect to GAPDH (Cell Signaling, #5174) expression. The primary antibodies were as follows and purchased from Cell Signaling: p110α (#4255), PDK1 (#3438), pPDK1Ser241 (#3061), pAKTSer473 (#4058), pAKTThr308 (#9275), AKT1 (#2938), AKT2 (#4057), pSmad2 ser465/467 (#3101), and pSmad3ser423/425 (#9520). TGFβ1 ELISA was performed as described previously using the R&D systems kit.18
Cell Culture
Cells were cultured from either a 4NQO-induced control tongue SCC (CUCON), or a 4NQO-induced PIK3CA-GEMM tongue SCC (CU110). Tumor tissues were minced with blade, and digested in 0.35% collagenase (GIBCO) followed by two rounds of 1% trypsin digestion at 37°C. Single cells were obtained through a cell strainer (70 mm nylon, BD Biosciences), and plated at 1×105/ml in 10cm dishes. Cells were cultured in DMEM+10% FBS and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin (GIBCO). The authentication of the cultured cells was validated by the transgene-specific genotyping PCR (Supplementary Figure S2).
Knockdown experiment
PIK3CA or PDK1 knockdown was achieved using a lentiviral-based sh-PIK3CA or sh-PDK1 purchased from Sigma (MISSION shRNA). TRCN0000361413 or TRCN0000361331 was used for mouse PIK3CA or PDK1 Knockdown, respectively, and SHC002 as a scramble control.
Cell Proliferation assay
Cells were seeded into 24-well plates as 1×105 cells/well, and were treated with 0–80μM LY2157299 (MedKoo Biosciences) for 48 hr. The cell proliferation was determined by using Vi-cell XR cell viability analyzer (Beckman Coulter). For the cell proliferation assay in CU110-shPDK1 and CU110-SCR cells, the assay was performed using cell counting kit 8 (Dojindo Molecular Technologies)
Migration and Invasion assay
The migration and invasion assays were performed using CytoSelect 24-well wound healing assay kit (Cell Biolabs) and QCM ECMatrix cell invasion assay kit (EMD Millipore). Three individual experiments were performed for each assay.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis for all qPCR data was performed using a two-sample equal variance and 2-tailed Student’s t-test. All of the above statistical analyses were performed using Prism4 (GraphPad). A P-value of less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01DE021788 (to S.L. Lu), University of Colorado Academic Enrichment Fund (to S.L. Lu), American Cancer Society (to S.L. Lu), University of Colorado Cancer Center (to S.L. Lu), and Cancer League of Colorado (to S.L. Lu). S.L. Lu is an investigator of THANC foundation. The author thanks the Transgenic Core of Oregon Health & Science University for generating founders of the mouse model, and the University of Colorado Skin Disease Research Center Morphology Phenotyping Core (P30 AR057212) for assisting with histological work.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2013;63:11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Leemans CR, Braakhuis BJ, Brakenhoff RH. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:606–619. doi: 10.1038/nrg1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu P, Cheng H, Roberts TM, Zhao JJ. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:627–644. doi: 10.1038/nrd2926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Du L, Shen J, Weems A, Lu SL. Role of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Oncol. 2012:450179. doi: 10.1155/2012/450179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vogt PK, Gymnopoulos M, Hart JR. PI 3-kinase and cancer: changing accents. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19:12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2008.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vasudevan KM, et al. AKT-independent signaling downstream of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in human cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marsh Durban V, Deuker MM, Bosenberg MW, Phillips W, McMahon M. Differential AKT dependency displayed by mouse models of BRAFV600E-initiated melanoma. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:5104–5118. doi: 10.1172/JCI69619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lui VW, et al. Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:761–769. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pickering CR, et al. Integrative genomic characterization of oral squamous cell carcinoma identifies frequent somatic drivers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:770–781. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Iglesias-Bartolome R, Martin D, Gutkind JS. Exploiting the Head and Neck Cancer Oncogenome: Widespread PI3K-mTOR Pathway Alterations and Novel Molecular Targets. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:722–725. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morris LG, et al. Genomic dissection of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/PI3K pathway reveals frequent deletion of the EGFR phosphatase PTPRS in head and neck cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:19024–19029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111963108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Woenckhaus J, et al. Genomic gain of PIK3CA and increased expression of p110alpha are associated with progression of dysplasia into invasive squamous cell carcinoma. J Pathol. 2002;198:335–342. doi: 10.1002/path.1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kozaki K, et al. PIK3CA mutation is an oncogenic aberration at advanced stages of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2006;97:1351–1358. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00343.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Estilo CL, et al. The role of novel oncogenes squamous cell carcinoma-related oncogene and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p110alpha in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:2300–2306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fenic I, Steger K, Gruber C, Arens C, Woenckhaus J. Analysis of PIK3CA and Akt/protein kinase B in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2007;18:253–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lu SL, et al. Overexpression of transforming growth factor beta1 in head and neck epithelia results in inflammation, angiogenesis, and epithelial hyperproliferation. Cancer Res. 2004;64:4405–4410. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vitale-Cross L, et al. Chemical carcinogenesis models for evaluating molecular-targeted prevention and treatment of oral cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2009;2:419–422. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mani SA, et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008;133:704–715. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Iliopoulos D, et al. MicroRNAs differentially regulated by Akt isoforms control EMT and stem cell renewal in cancer cells. Sci Signal. 2009;2:ra62. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marvel D, Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment: expect the unexpected. J Clin Invest. 2015:1–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI80005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lu SL, et al. Loss of transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor promotes metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1331–1342. doi: 10.1101/gad.1413306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bornstein S, et al. Smad4 loss in mice causes spontaneous head and neck cancer with increased genomic instability and inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:3408–3419. doi: 10.1172/JCI38854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu P, et al. Oncogenic PIK3CA-driven mammary tumors frequently recur via PI3K pathway-dependent and PI3K pathway-independent mechanisms. Nat Med. 2011;17:1116–1120. doi: 10.1038/nm.2402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Klarenbeek S, van Miltenburg MH, Jonkers J. Genetically engineered mouse models of PI3K signaling in breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2013;7:146–164. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Engelman JA, et al. Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat Med. 2008;14:1351–1356. doi: 10.1038/nm.1890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kinross KM, et al. An activating Pik3ca mutation coupled with Pten loss is sufficient to initiate ovarian tumorigenesis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:553–557. doi: 10.1172/JCI59309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hare LM, et al. Physiological expression of the PI3K-activating mutation Pik3ca(H1047R) combines with Apc loss to promote development of invasive intestinal adenocarcinomas in mice. Biochem J. 2014;458:251–258. doi: 10.1042/BJ20131412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hennessy BT, et al. Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4116–4124. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wallin JJ, et al. Active PI3K pathway causes an invasive phenotype which can be reversed or promoted by blocking the pathway at divergent nodes. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fan QW, et al. EGFR signals to mTOR through PKC and independently of Akt in glioma. Sci Signal. 2009;2:ra4. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lauring J, et al. Knock in of the AKT1 E17K mutation in human breast epithelial cells does not recapitulate oncogenic PIK3CA mutations. Oncogene. 2010;29:2337–2345. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xue G, et al. Akt/PKB-mediated phosphorylation of Twist1 promotes tumor metastasis via mediating cross-talk between PI3K/Akt and TGF-beta signaling axes. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:248–259. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Curry NL, et al. Pten-null tumors cohabiting the same lung display differential AKT activation and sensitivity to dietary restriction. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:908–921. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wong KK. Oral-specific chemical carcinogenesis in mice: an exciting model for cancer prevention and therapy. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2009;2:10–13. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Weber SM, et al. Tobacco-specific carcinogen nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone induces AKT activation in head and neck epithelia. Int J Oncol. 2011;39:1193–1198. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2011.1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Moral M, et al. Akt activation synergizes with Trp53 loss in oral epithelium to produce a novel mouse model for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1099–1108. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pearce LR, Komander D, Alessi DR. The nuts and bolts of AGC protein kinases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrm2822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Finlay DK, et al. Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 controls migration and malignant transformation but not cell growth and proliferation in PTEN-null lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 2009;206:2441–2454. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Feng Q, et al. PDK1 regulates vascular remodeling and promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cardiac development. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:3711–3721. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00420-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Maurer M, et al. 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 potentiates upstream lesions on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6299–6306. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Garcia-Carracedo D, et al. Loss of PTEN expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:6830–6841. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Scortegagna M, et al. Genetic inactivation or pharmacological inhibition of Pdk1 delays development and inhibits metastasis of Braf::Pten melanoma. Oncogene. 2013;33:4330–4339. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Eser S, et al. Selective requirement of PI3K/PDK1 signaling for Kras oncogene-driven pancreatic cell plasticity and cancer. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:406–420. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bhola NE, et al. Antitumor mechanisms of targeting the PDK1 pathway in head and neck cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11:1236–1246. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Raimondi C, Chikh A, Wheeler AP, Maffucci T, Falasca M. A novel regulatory mechanism links PLCgamma1 to PDK1. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:3153–3163. doi: 10.1242/jcs.100511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tan J, et al. PDK1 signaling toward PLK1-MYC activation confers oncogenic transformation, tumor-initiating cell activation, and resistance to mTOR-targeted therapy. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:1156–1171. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang L, Zhou F, ten Dijke P. Signaling interplay between transforming growth factor-beta receptor and PI3K/AKT pathways in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2013;38:612–620. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yi JY, Shin I, Arteaga CL. Type I transforming growth factor beta receptor binds to and activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:10870–10876. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413223200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Du Y, Peyser ND, Grandis JR. Integration of molecular targeted therapy with radiation in head and neck cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;142:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Signore M, et al. Combined PDK1 and CHK1 inhibition is required to kill glioblastoma stem-like cells in vitro and in vivo. Cell death & disease. 2014;5:e1223. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Akhurst RJ, Hata A. Targeting the TGFbeta signalling pathway in disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:790–811. doi: 10.1038/nrd3810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Han G, et al. Distinct mechanisms of TGF-beta1-mediated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis during skin carcinogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1714–1723. doi: 10.1172/JCI24399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.