Abstract
A prototype Malthus Microbiological Growth Analyser was compared with conventional methods for examining blood cultures in a trial of 651 cultures mostly from patients with haematological malignancy or undergoing haemodialysis or renal transplantation. Of 100 significantly positive cultures, organisms from 82 grew in the conventional aerobic (+ CO2) bottle, 78 in the conventional anaerobic bottle and 71 in the Malthus bottle. The differences were not statistically significant (p greater than 0.05). The Malthus system detected 83.6% of significantly positive cultures earlier than the comparable conventional bottles while 7.3% positive cultures were detected earlier by the conventional system. When use of the Malthus system was restricted to the hours of 09.00 to 17.30 daily 27.3% positive cultures were detected earlier by the Malthus system and 16.4% were detected earlier by the conventional system. One of the organisms which grew in the Malthus bottle, a contaminating Staphylococcus epidermidis, was not detected by the Malthus system. Instability of electrodes resulted in 26.9% false positive cultures with the prototype Malthus system. Contamination rates in both the Malthus and conventional anaerobic bottles were lower than in the aerobic bottles.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Braunstein H., Tomasulo M. A quantitative study of the multiplication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vented and unvented blood-culture bottles. Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Jul;66(1):80–86. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/66.1.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards J. C., Jason A. C., Hobbs G., Gibson D. M., Christie R. H. Electronic measurement of bacterial growth. J Phys E. 1978 Jun;11(6):560–568. doi: 10.1088/0022-3735/11/6/017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ur A., Brown D. F. Impedance monitoring of bacterial activity. J Med Microbiol. 1975 Feb;8(1):19–28. doi: 10.1099/00222615-8-1-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]