Skip to main content
BMC Genomics logoLink to BMC Genomics
. 2016 Aug 15;17:640. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2872-2

Supplements of vitamins B9 and B12 affect hepatic and mammary gland gene expression profiles in lactating dairy cows

Bazoumana Ouattara 1,, Nathalie Bissonnette 1, Melissa Duplessis 1,2, Christiane L Girard 1
PMCID: PMC4986251  PMID: 27526683

Abstract

Background

A combined supplement of vitamins B9 and B12 was reported to increase milk and milk component yields of dairy cows without effect on feed intake. The present study was undertaken to verify whether this supplementation positively modifies the pathways involved in milk and milk component synthesis. Thus, by studying the transcriptome activity in these tissues, the effect of supplements of both vitamins on the metabolism of both liver and mammary gland, was investigated. For this study, 24 multiparous Holstein dairy cows were assigned to 6 blocks of 4 animals each according to previous 305-day milk production. Within each block, cows were randomly assigned to weekly intramuscular injections of 5 mL of either saline 0.9 % NaCl, 320 mg of vitamin B9, 10 mg of vitamin B12 or a combination of both vitamins (B9 + B12). The experimental period began 3 weeks before the expected calving date and lasted 9 weeks of lactation. Liver and mammary biopsies were performed on lactating dairy cows 64 ± 3 days after calving. Samples from both tissues were analyzed by microarray and qPCR to identify genes differentially expressed in hepatic and mammary tissues.

Results

Microarray analysis identified 47 genes in hepatic tissue and 16 genes in the mammary gland whose expression was modified by the vitamin supplements. Gene ontology (GO) categorizes genes in non-overlapping domains of molecular biology. Panther is one of the online GO resources used for gene function classification. It classifies the 63 genes according to Molecular Function, Biological Process and Protein Class. Most of the biological processes modulated by the vitamin supplements were associated to developmental process, protein metabolic process, transport and response to inflammation. In the liver, most of the genes modulated by the vitamin treatments involved protein metabolic process while developmental process appeared to be more affected by the treatments in mammary gland. Out of 25 genes analysed by qPCR, 7 were validated.

Conclusion

The results indicate that several metabolic processes were modulated by the supplementation of vitamins in early-lactating dairy cows. In addition, the results suggest that the vitamin supplements promoted liver regeneration and reduced catabolism of lipids in early lactation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2872-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Dairy cow, Liver, Mammary gland, Vitamin B9, Vitamin B12, Microarray

Background

Bacteria present in rumen synthesize B vitamins in generally sufficient amounts to meet their host’s requirements [1]. Notwithstanding, high-producing dairy cows could benefit from vitamin B9 and B12 supplements, especially during the critical period around calving and in early lactation [24]. Vitamin B9 plays a major role in DNA synthesis and in de novo formation of methyl groups required for the methylation cycle. On the other hand, vitamin B12 is involved in two metabolic pathways: the remethylation cycle and as coenzyme of the methylmalonyl-CoA mutase. The former, closely related to folate metabolism, is required for the regeneration of methionine and tetrahydrofolate, whereas the later allows the entry of propionate in the Krebs cycle and gluconeogenesis [5].

Results from two studies suggest that supplementary vitamin B9 might improve efficiency of nutrient utilization, especially for milk protein synthesis [6, 7]. This observation is supported by the observation that in vitro hormonal stimulation of milk protein synthesis by mammary gland explants of dairy cows increased expression of 28 genes; among them, 2 genes related to folate metabolism, FOLR1 and ALDH1L1 [8]. The former is a folate transporter allowing the entry of 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate into the cells whereas the latter is involved in purine synthesis. As vitamin B9 supplement increases milk protein synthesis, it would be interesting to investigate whether similar transcriptomic process takes place in vivo when vitamin supplements are provided to lactating cows.

A combined supplement of vitamins B9 and B12 given during the peripartum period and in early lactation altered energy partitioning during the first weeks of lactation as compared to control cows [3, 4, 9]. However, the mode of action of this supplement is not fully elucidated. We observed that a combined supplement of vitamins B9 and B12 increases whole-body rate of appearance of glucose which is the sum of glucose from portal absorption, glycogenolysis, and gluconeogenesis [3]. Propionate originating from rumen fermentation is the major precursor of glucose in cows [10, 11] and contributes up to 60 % of glucose flux rate [12, 13]. For ruminants, the glucose, essential for synthesis of milk lactose, is mostly provided by liver (up to 90 %) through gluconeogenesis [14].

It has been shown that at the onset of lactation, the liver as well as the mammary gland undergo numerous adaptations to support milk synthesis [15]. In early lactation, feed intake is not sufficient to meet the nutrient demand for milk production, leading to a negative energy balance [15]. Furthermore, the liver undergoes extensive physiological and biochemical changes mediated by significant alterations in hepatic gene expression in an attempt to re-establish metabolic homeostasis and to counteract the adverse effects of negative energy balance [16]. In addition, during this period, the mammary gland is actively remodeling. In fact, by investigating the transcriptional response of the mammary gland during early lactation, Connor et al. [17] observed changes in mammary expression of genes involved in cell proliferation, cellular remodeling, and nutrient transport.

Therefore, the aim of the present project was to profile the genes for which expression undergoes major changes in hepatic and mammary tissues of lactating dairy cows according to vitamins B9 and B12 supply.

Results

At week 9 of lactation, there was no treatment effect (P ≥ 0.1) on dry matter intake, milk production, milk total solid yields as well as milk component contents. Dry matter intake, milk production, milk total solid yields, milk fat, protein and lactose contents averaged 18.8 (SE 1.9) kg/d, 34.7 (SE 2.9) kg/d, 3.92 (SE 0.33) kg/d, 36.0 (SE 2.0) g/kg, 30.2 (SE 1.4) g/kg, and 46.9 (SE 6.0) g/kg, respectively. During the seven weeks following calving, body condition score losses tended to be reduced (interaction vitamin × time, P = 0.10) in cows receiving the vitamin B9 supplements, alone or combined with vitamin B12. Plasma concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate were also lower (P ≤ 0.06), averaging 175 and 243 μM (SEM 17) and 0.70 and 0.77 mM (SEM 0.03) for cows receiving or not receiving supplementary vitamin B9, respectively.

The microarray analysis revealed that, as compared to control cows receiving no vitamin supplement, the vitamin treatments significantly changed (FDR ≤ 0.05) the expression of some genes by more than 2-fold in hepatic and mammary tissues (Fig. 1 a and b, respectively). The expression of 47 genes in hepatic tissue was modified by at least one of the vitamin treatment compared to control cows (Fig. 1a). From this panel of 47 genes, 41 could be assigned to a biological process using the Panther classification system (Tables 1 and 2). Out of these 47 genes, expression of 14 genes was analyzed by qPCR (Fig. 2). Although nine false positive genes were observed, five genes were confirmed to be differentially expressed in the group of cows supplemented with vitamins.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Number of genes (and probes) influenced by the vitamin supplementation. Supplements of vitamin B9 (B9), vitamin B12 (B12) or both vitamins (B9 + B12) were given to dairy cows. The Venn diagram shows the number of significant genes. The number of probes is bracketed “()”. (FDR ≤ 0.05) with more than 2-fold change between the control group and each treatment group in (a) hepatic tissue and (b) mammary tissue

Table 1.

Gene Ontology annotations of the differentially expressed hepatic genes with the Panther Classification Systema

Treatment Gene symbol Gene name Treatment effect Molecular function Biological process Protein class
B9
DLK1 Delta-like 1 homolog (Drosophila) Down-regulated receptor activity
extracellular matrix structural constituent
receptor binding
transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
cell communication
ectoderm development
nervous system development
intracellular protein transport
receptor-mediated endocytosis
regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
membrane-bound signaling molecule
receptor
extracellular matrix structural protein
MYOM1 Myomesin-1 Down-regulated protein kinase activity
structural constituent of cytoskeleton
protein binding
small GTPase regulator activity
guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity
protein phosphorylation
cell communication
cell adhesion
muscle contraction
mesoderm development
muscle organ development
regulation of catalytic activity
non-receptor serine/threonine protein kinase
non-receptor serine/threonine protein kinase
guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor
actin family cytoskeletal protein
cell adhesion molecule
B12
HERC6 HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase family member 6 Up-regulated ligase activity catabolic process
cellular protein modification process
proteolysis
cellular process
ubiquitin-protein ligase
SESN2 Sestrin-2 Up-regulated oxidoreductase activity
peroxidase activity
metabolic process
cell cycle
Peroxidase
GPNMB glycoprotein (transmembrane) nmb Up-regulated receptor binding cellular process membrane-bound signaling molecule
cell adhesion molecule
IFI6 Interferon alpha-inducible protein 6 Up-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
PPP1R3B Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B Up-regulated phosphatase activity
protein binding
phosphatase regulator activity
glycogen metabolic process
regulation of catalytic activity
phosphatase modulator
ID1 ID1 protein Up-regulated sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
transcription factor
IFI27 interferon, alpha-inducible protein 27 Up-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
MEP1B meprin A, beta Up-regulated oxidoreductase activity
serine-type peptidase activity
metallopeptidase activity
receptor activity
lipid transporter activity
transmembrane transporter activity
receptor binding
enzyme regulator activity
immune system process
proteolysis
synaptic transmission
cell-cell adhesion
visual perception
sensory perception
ectoderm development
mesoderm development
skeletal system development
angiogenesis
nervous system development
heart development
blood coagulation
lipid transport
intracellular protein transport
endocytosis
vitamin transport
regulation of catalytic activity
transporter
apolipoprotein
membrane-bound signaling molecule
receptor
metalloprotease
serine protease
oxidase
metalloprotease
serine protease
extracellular matrix protein
enzyme modulator
cell adhesion molecule
FUT5 fucosyltransferase 5 (alpha (1,3) fucosyltransferase Up-regulated transferase activity, transferring glycosyl groups protein glycosylation glycosyltransferase
G0S2 G0/G1switch 2 Up-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
CDK5R1 Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activator 1 Up-regulated kinase activity
protein binding
kinase activator activity
kinase regulator activity
protein phosphorylation
cell cycle
regulation of catalytic activity
kinase activator
ISG15 Ubiquitin-like protein ISG15 Up-regulated structural constituent of ribosome
nucleic acid binding
proteolysis ribosomal protein
 LOC515676 NFX1-type zinc finger-containing protein 1-like Up-regulated peptidase activity
protein binding
serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity
proteolysis
regulation of catalytic activity
serine protease inhibitor
SPP1 Osteopontin Up-regulated cytokine activity immune system process
cellular process
cell adhesion
cellular component morphogenesis
cellular component organization
cytokine
extracellular matrix protein
defense/immunity protein
cell adhesion molecule
DLK1 Delta-like 1 homolog (Drosophila) Down-regulated receptor activity
extracellular matrix structural constituent
receptor binding
transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
cell communication
ectoderm development
nervous system development
intracellular protein transport
receptor-mediated endocytosis
regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
membrane-bound signaling molecule
receptor
extracellular matrix structural protein
MYOM1 Myomesin-1 Down-regulated protein kinase activity
structural constituent of cytoskeleton
protein binding
small GTPase regulator activity
guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity
protein phosphorylation
cell communication
cell adhesion
muscle contraction
mesoderm development
muscle organ development
regulation of catalytic activity
non-receptor serine/threonine protein kinase
non-receptor serine/threonine protein kinase
guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor
actin family cytoskeletal protein
cell adhesion molecule
MT1E Metallothionein
MT1E
Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
NEFH ortholog
Uncharacterized protein (Fragment)
NEFH
ortholog
Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
SFRP1 Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 Down-regulated receptor activity
protein binding
reproduction
cell communication
single-multicellular organism process
nervous system development
response to stimulus
regulation of biological process
signaling molecule
G-protein coupled receptor
KIAA1324 KIAA1324 ortholog Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
MGC126945 Uncharacterized protein Down-regulated receptor activity B cell mediated immunity
antigen processing and presentation
cellular defense response
immunoglobulin receptor superfamily
immunoglobulin receptor superfamily
major histocompatibility complex antigen
MT1A Metallothionein-1A
MT1A
Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
B9 + B12
SAA3 Serum amyloid A protein Down-regulated lipid transporter activity
transmembrane transporter activity
immune system process
lipid transport
transporter
apolipoprotein
defense/immunity protein
 LOC100126815 MHC class I-like family A1 Down-regulated receptor activity B cell mediated immunity
antigen processing and presentation
cellular defense response
immunoglobulin receptor superfamily
immunoglobulin receptor superfamily
major histocompatibility complex antigen
ACMSD 2-amino-3-carboxymuconate-6-semialdehyde decarboxylase Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
THRSP THRSP protein Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
MGC126945 Uncharacterized protein Down-regulated receptor activity B cell mediated immunity
antigen processing and presentation
cellular defense response
immunoglobulin receptor superfamily
immunoglobulin receptor superfamily
major histocompatibility complex antigen
MT1A Metallothionein-1A
MT1A
Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
C4H7orf57 chromosome 4 open reading frame, human C7orf57 Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
CACNA2D1 calcium channel, voltage-dependent, alpha 2/delta subunit Down-regulated cation transmembrane transporter activity cation transport
protein targeting
Unassigned
GSTA5 Glutathione S-transferase Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
 LOC509034 feline leukemia virus subgroup C receptor-related protein 2-like Down-regulated transmembrane transporter activity transport transporter
NHEDC1 solute carrier family 9, subfamily B (cation proton antiporter 2), member 1 Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
SH3YL1 SH3 domain-containing YSC84-like protein 1 Down-regulated structural constituent of cytoskeleton
actin binding
cellular process non-motor actin binding protein
HP Haptoglobin Down-regulated serine-type peptidase activity
calcium ion binding
calmodulin binding
calcium-dependent phospholipid binding
gamete generation
complement activation
proteolysis
cellular process
blood circulation
response to stress
blood coagulation
serine protease
serine protease
complement component
annexin
calmodulin
NGEF neuronal guanine nucleotide exchange factor Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
LGALS3 Lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 3 Up-regulated receptor binding cellular process signaling molecule
cell adhesion molecule
 LOC524810 IgM Up-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
LOXL4 Lysyl oxidase homolog 4 Up-regulated oxidoreductase activity
serine-type peptidase activity
receptor activity
macrophage activation
apoptotic process
proteolysis
cell communication
cell-cell adhesion
neurological system process
cellular defense response
extracellular transport
negative regulation of apoptotic process
receptor
serine protease
oxidase
serine protease
PYCR1 Pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase 1, mitochondrial Up-regulated oxidoreductase activity cellular amino acid biosynthetic process reductase
MSMB Uncharacterized protein Up-regulated hormone activity peptide hormone
IGLL1 immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 1 Up-regulated antigen binding B cell mediated immunity
hemopoiesis
response to stimulus
Immunoglobulin
MT1E Metallothionein
MT1E
Down-regulated Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
GPNMB glycoprotein (transmembrane) nmb Up-regulated receptor binding cellular process membrane-bound signaling molecule
cell adhesion molecule

All genes differentially expressed in liver were classified using the Gene Ontology annotations with the Panther Classification System. Some of these genes were not found by Panther genes list analysing system and some could not be classified. Only three ontology categories are presented: Molecular Function, Biological Process and Protein Class

aPanther gene list classification system of the genes differentially expressed in hepatic tissue of cows receiving vitamin supplements (vitamin B9 alone: B9, vitamin B12 alone: B12 or both vitamins: B9 + B12) as compared to no vitamins treatment (Control)

Table 2.

Identification of the major biological processes of the genes differentially expressed in hepatic tissuea

Biological process Genes
Level 1 Level 2/3 Symbol Fold Change
apoptotic process negative regulation of apoptotic process LOXL4 1.6
biological adhesion cell adhesion MYOM1
SPP1
MEP1B
LOXL4
−2.5
0.9
1.3
1.6
biological regulation regulation of biological process DLK1
SFRP1
ID1
LOXL4
−2.5
−1.8
1.1
1.6
regulation of molecular function MYOM1
CDK5R1
PPP1R3B
MEP1B
LOC515676
−2.5
0.8
1.1
1.3
1.9
cellular component organization or biogenesis cellular component organization SPP1 0.9
cellular process cell communication DLK1
MYOM1
SFRP1
MEP1B
LOXL4
−2.5
−2.5
−1.8
1.3
1.6
cell cycle CDK5R1
SESN2
0.8
0.9
developmental process anatomical structure morphogenesis SPP1 0.9
death LOXL4 1.6
ectoderm development DLK1
MEP1B
−2.5
1.3
mesoderm development MYOM1
MEP1B
−2.5
1.3
system development DLK1
MYOM1
SFRP1
MEP1B
IGLL1
−2.5
−2.5
−1.8
1.3
2.1
immune system process antigen processing and presentation LOC100126815
MGC126945
−2.4
−1.8
immune response LOC100126815
MGC126945
HP
IGLL1
−2.4
−1.8
−1.6
2.1
macrophage activation LOXL4 1.6
localization transport DLK1
LOC509034
SAA3
CACNA2D1
MEP1B
LOXL4
−2.5
−1.5
−1.1
−1.0
1.3
1.6
metabolic process catabolic process HERC6 1.8
carbohydrate metabolic process PPP1R3B 1.1
cellular amino acid metabolic process PYCR1 1.5
nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process DLK1
ID1
−2.5
1.1
protein metabolic process MYOM1
HP
CDK5R1
MEP1B
LOXL4
FUT5
HERC6
LOC515676
ISG15
−2.5
−1.6
0.8
1.3
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.9
2.5
multicellular organismal process single-multicellular organism process MYOM1
SFRP1
HP
MEP1B
LOXL4
−2.5
−1.8
−1.6
1.3
1.6
reproduction gamete generation HP −1.6
response to stimulus cellular defense response LOC100126815
MGC126945
LOXL4
−2.4
−1.8
1.6
immune response LOC100126815
MGC126945
HP
IGLL1
−2.4
−1.8
−1.6
2.1
response to external stimulus HP
MEP1B
−1.6
1.3
response to stress HP −1.6
Not found C20H5orf49 LOC789904
SLC22A9
CFH
SLC26A10
SAA2
M-SAA3
LOC100847494
LOC100335975
LOC617654
−1.9
−1.8
−1.7
−1.5
−1.4
−1.2
−1.1
−0.9
1.4
4.2
Unassigned C4H7orf57
MT1E
MT1A
THRSP
KIAA1324
NGEF
GSTA5
ACMSD
NHEDC1
NEFH
G0S2
LOC524810
IFI27
IFI6
−4.4
−3.4
−3.3
−1.7
−1.6
−1.4
−1.3
−1.2
−1.1
−1.1
1.9
2.6
3.3
3.7

All genes modulated in the liver by the vitamins treatment, including those that were not found or classified by the Panther system are listed. The fold change observed by microarray analysis varies from −4.4 to 4.2 and only significantly (FDR ≤ 0.05) expressed genes (compared to control) are shown

aIdentification of the major biological processes of the genes differentially expressed in hepatic tissue of cows receiving vitamin supplements (vitamin B9 alone: B9, vitamin B12 alone: B12 or both vitamins: B9 + B12) as compared to no vitamins treatment (Control)

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Expression of genes measured by quantitative PCR in the liver of the dairy cows that received either no vitamin supplement: Control: no vitamin supplement; vitamin B9 supplement (B9); vitamin B12 supplement (B12) or a combined supplement of vitamins B9 and B12 (B9 + B12). Means different from the control treatment are indicated by *** when P value ≤ 0.01, ** when P values were between 0.01 and 0.05 and * when there was a trend with P values between 0.05 and 0.1

The expression of two genes was significantly modified in liver by the B9 treatment as illustrated in the Venn diagram (Fig. 1a). One gene that also significantly down-regulated by the B12 treatment was confirmed by qPCR for these cows. This repression of DLK1 in liver was down-regulated by the three vitamin treatments (Fig. 2). The B12 treatment had the greatest impact on the liver with 22 genes (totalizing 39 significant probes; Fig. 1a) whose expression level differed by more than 2-fold compared to control (Table 2).

Among the 22 genes affected by the B12 treatment, four genes were also influenced in cows receiving the B9 + B12 treatment: the methallothioneins 1A (MT1A) and 1E (MTIE), the transmembrane glycoprotein (GPNMB), and an uncharacterized protein (MGC126945) (Table 1). Expression of two of these genes (MT1A and GPNMB) was studied by qPCR (Fig. 2). This analysis confirmed the repression of MTIA in liver of cows receiving B12 and B9 + B12 treatments. Results from the microarray analysis indicated an up-regulation of the expression of GPNMB with both B12 and B9 + B12 treatments. The qPCR analysis showed a numerical but not statistically significant increase with these treatments probably due to the large variation in the expression for this gene among the limited number of animals of this study (Fig. 2). Among the other 17 genes affected by the B12 treatment, the expression of seven genes were studied by qPCR but no effect were confirmed for 6 of them (HERC6, IF127, ISG15, MEP1B, PPP1R3B and SFRP1). Only the expression of the G0/G1switch 2 gene (G0S2) was up-regulated in liver of cows receiving the B12 treatment as compared to control (Fig. 2).

In addition to these four genes influenced by B12 treatment, alone and in combination with B9, 24 other genes were affected when both vitamins were administrated simultaneously to the cows; four genes were studied by qPCR. Two of them, namely the haptoprotein (HP) and lysyl oxidase-like 4 (LOXL4), were confirmed as being respectively down and up-regulated by the combined treatment. Nevertheless, the expression of LOXL4 was also up-regulated in liver of B9 cows whereas, the expression of HP was down-regulated by all vitamin treatments (Fig. 2). No difference in expression of GSTA5 and SLC22A9 could be detected.

In mammary gland, the B9 treatment modified the expression of nine genes by 2-fold as compared to cows receiving no vitamin supplement. The B12 treatment affected five genes and the expression of five genes was influenced by the B9 + B12 treatment (Fig. 1b). The B9 + B12 shared one gene with the B12 treatment. Based on results from the microarray analysis, three genes whose expression was modified by the B9 treatment (Fig. 1b), cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector a (CIDEA), the androgen binding protein beta-like (LOC785756), and the periostin (POSTN) genes were studied by qPCR in addition to some candidate genes (Fig. 3). Out of the 11 genes analyzed by qPCR, two genes were confirmed; then, the percentage of false positive in the mammary was 82 %. RAB15 and POSTN were significantly up-regulated respectively by the B12 and B9 as compared to control (Fig. 3). Out of the 16 genes affected in the mammary gland by vitamin supplements, 13 were classified using Panther classification system (Table 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Expression of genes in mammary gland measured by quantitative PCR according to treatments. Control: no vitamin supplement; B9: vitamin B9 supplement; B12: vitamin B12 supplement; B9 + B12: combined supplement of vitamins B9 and B12. Means different from the control treatment are indicated by *** when P value ≤ 0.01, ** when P values were between 0.01 and 0.05 and * when there was a trend with P values between 0.05 and 0.1

Table 3.

Panther gene list classification system for the genes differentially expressed in mammary gland tissuea

Treatment Gene symbol Gene name Treatment regulation effect Molecular Function Biological Process Protein Class
B9
POSTN Periostin Up- receptor binding cell communication
cell-matrix adhesion
visual perception
sensory perception
mesoderm development
skeletal system development
muscle organ development
signaling molecule
cell adhesion molecule
FUT5 Alpha-(1,3)-Fucosyltransferase Up- transferase activity, transferring glycosyl groups protein glycosylation glycosyltransferase
ATP6V1G3 V-Type Proton Atpase Subunit G 3 Up- hydrolase activity
cation transmembrane transporter activity
proton-transporting ATP synthase activity, rotational mechanism
nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
cation transport
ATP synthase
hydrolase
 LOC785756 androgen binding protein beta-like Down- Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
MGC126945 uncharacterized protein MGC126945 Down- receptor activity B cell mediated immunity
antigen processing and presentation
cellular defense response
immunoglobulin receptor superfamily
major histocompatibility complex antigen
CIDEA cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector a Down- Unassigned induction of apoptosis Unassigned
B12
GPR110 G-Protein Coupled Receptor 110-Related Up- G-protein coupled receptor activity spermatogenesis
immune response
synaptic transmission
neurotransmitter secretion
mesoderm development
heart development
response to stress
intracellular protein transport
synaptic vesicle exocytosis
G-protein coupled receptor
antibacterial response protein
IRX6 iroquois homeobox 6 Up- sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity
sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity
transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
ectoderm development
nervous system development
regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
homeobox transcription factor
nucleic acid binding
RAB15 Ras-related protein Rab-15 Up- Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
B9 + B12
 LOC509034 feline leukemia virus subgroup C receptor-related protein 2-like Down- transmembrane transporter activity transport Transporter
IDO1 indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 Down- Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned
SECTM1 SECTM1 protein Down- Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned

Differentially expressed genes in mammary tissue were assigned to gene ontology pathways using the Panther tool. Some genes were not found in Panther genes list. Furthermore, among the genes ID found by the PANTHER system, some were not classified to a category. Only 3 genes ontology categories are presented: Molecular Function, Biological Process and Protein Class

aClassification with the Panther gene list classification system of the genes differentially expressed in mammary tissue following supplementation with vitamin B9 (B9), vitamin B12 (B12) or both (B9 + B12) as compared to no vitamin treatment (Control)

As shown in Tables 1 and 3, some of the genes identified by microarray in liver and mammary gland were annotated and clustered into three major gene ontology groups: Protein Class, Molecular Function and Biological Process. In Tables 2 and 4, gene expression clusters are categorized within biological processes (levels 1, 2 and 3). This allows looking for statistically over- and under-represented biological process categories among the genes. Most of the genes modulated in the liver by at least one of the vitamin supplements were associated to developmental process, protein metabolic process, transport and immune response (Table 2). However, protein metabolic process was over-represented (with 9 genes: MYOM1, HP, CDK5R1, MEP1B, LOXL4, FUT5, HERC6, LOC515676 and ISG15) in the gene list affected by treatments in the liver (Table 2). In the mammary gland, where very few genes were affected by the vitamin treatments, the over-represented biological process was developmental process involving 4 genes: CIDEA, POSTN, GPR110 and IRX6 (Table 4).

Table 4.

Identification of the major biological processes of the genes differentially expressed in mammary gland tissuea

Biological process Genes
Level 1 Level 2/3 Symbol Fold change
apoptotic process induction of apoptosis CIDEA −1.9
biological adhesion cell adhesion POSTN 1.1
biological regulation regulation of biological process IRX6 1.7
cellular process cell communication POSTN
GPR110
1.1
1.3
developmental process death CIDEA −1.9
ectoderm development IRX6 1.7
mesoderm development POSTN
GPR110
1.1
1.3
system development POSTN
GPR110
IRX6
1.1
1.3
1.7
immune system process antigen processing and presentation MGC126945 −1.5
immune response MGC126945
GPR110
−1.9
1.3
localization transport ATP6V1G3
LOC509034
GPR110
−0.9
−0.6
1.3
metabolic process nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process ATP6V1G3
IRX6
−0.9
1.7
protein metabolic process FUT5 3.6
multicellular organismal process single-multicellular organism process POSTN
GPR110
1.1
1.3
reproduction gamete generation GPR110 1.3
response to stimulus cellular defense response MGC126945 −1.9
immune response MGC126945
GPR110
−1.9
1.3
response to stress GPR110 1.3
Not found LOC751574
VAV1
LOC614268
SAA2
C10H14orf53
H1FNT
−1.3
−1.2
−0.9
−0.9
1.4
4.9
Unassigned LOC785756
IDO1
SECTM1
RAB15
−2.1
−1.2
−0.9
2.0

All genes modulated in the mammary tissue by the vitamins treatment, including those that were not found or classified by the Panther system are listed. The Fold Change, as using FlexArray microarray analysis, varies from −1.9 to 4.9 and only significantly (FDR ≤ 0.05) expressed genes (compared to control) are shown

aIdentification of the major biological processes of the genes differentially expressed in mammary tissue following supplementation with vitamin B9 (B9), vitamin B12 (B12) or both vitamins (B9 + B12) as compared to no vitamin treatment (Control)

Gene symbols were uploaded to the Panther workspace in order to classify the genes of interest by selecting the Bos taurus reference gene list based on the selected organism [18]. Notwithstanding, some genes in both tissues (liver and mammary gland) could not be assigned to any biological process or molecular function category by Panther classification system (Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4). It is also possible that there is no experimental data to support their biological annotation.

Discussion

Microarray analysis was used to investigate the effects of vitamin B9 and B12 supplements given alone or in combination during the peripartum early lactation period on liver and mammary gland tissues. The expression of only a limited number of genes was modulated by the vitamin treatments in both tissues, which suggests a subtle vitamin effect on the tissue metabolism that would have been better characterized using a larger population. Notwithstanding, the qPCR analyses show that, in liver, expression of keys genes, such as DLK1, LOXL4, G0S2, GSTA5, HP, MT1A, IFI27 and SFRP1 was modulated at different extents (significant effects for five genes and a strong trend for three genes) by the vitamin treatments. Delta-like 1 homolog (DLK1/Pref-1) is a surface marker of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) associated with less differentiated hepatocellular phenotypes [19] and it has been shown to act in vitro as an inhibitor of Notch signaling [20, 21] to promote liver regeneration [21]. Interestingly, DLK1 is an imprinted gene which is involved in lipid metabolic reprogramming [22]. An increased concentration of this biomarker in blood serum is associated with hepatic cancer [23] whereas downregulation of DLK1 expression through an epigenetic mechanism contributes to attenuate liver disease [24]. Because vitamin B9 plays a major role in de novo formation of methyl groups and vitamin B12 is required for the remethylation cycle, we can speculate that DLK1 expression could also be repressed in the liver of the lactating cows through an epigenetic mechanism. Because DLK1 suppresses glucose production and fatty acid synthesis and oxidation in hepatocytes [25], supplementation of both vitamins B9 and B12 might increase liver metabolism through a genomic imprinting mechanism which negatively impacts the DLK1 pathway.

Lysyl oxidase-like member 4 (LOXL4), a matrix-remodeling enzymes, is extracellularly secreted and significantly contributes to ECM deposition [26]. Activity of lysyl oxidase (LOX) and LOX like proteins are correlated to collagen and elastin deposition and, in adult mammals, are essential to tissue maintenance [27]. Recent studies have provided compelling evidence that G0S2 is abundantly expressed in metabolically active tissues such as liver, and acts as a molecular brake on triglyceride catabolism [28]. Triglyceride hydrolase activity of adipose triglyceride lipase can be selectively inhibited by G0S2 [28]. Hence, increasing the expression of G0S2 decreased lipolysis [29] which is supported by the reduction of plasma concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids in cows receiving vitamin B9 supplements, alone or combined with vitamin B12 in the present study. Although increased IFI27 expression was not significant, the pattern was highly similar to G0S2 thus suggesting a similar B9 supplement effect on the liver for this gene. Expression of the alpha-inducible protein 27 (IFI27) is up-regulated during inflammatory wound repair process [30] and expression of this gene also alters immune response and mitochondrial function [31]. Interestingly, DLK1 locus expression is also associated with a restriction of the mitochondrial metabolism [32]. These gene expression patterns support the hypothesis that both vitamins B9 and B12 improve the hepatic function which might reduce metabolic stress during the transition period and early lactation of dairy cows. This is further supported by the marked reduction of the HP and MT1A genes. The liver is the major site for the synthesis of acute phase proteins including haptoglobin (HP) and metallothionein 1A (MT1A) [30]. During stress response, it is reported that physiological processes aimed on redistribution of energy utilization in specific organs stimulating mobilization of body reserves. In mammary gland, administration of the three vitamin treatments had a very limited effect on gene expression as described above. Interestingly, in the present study, whereas vitamin treatments had no effect on milk total solids yield and dry matter intake, vitamin B9 supplements, given alone or in combination with vitamin B12, decreased body condition score losses during the first weeks of lactation as well as plasma concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate [9] suggesting an improvement in energy balance for these cows.

In the present study, all the genes that have their expression affected by the vitamin treatments in the liver, are involved in tissue repair, resorption of inflammation and lipid metabolism although no mode of action can be clearly identified. During the first weeks of lactation, dairy cows are generally in negative energy balance because nutrient intake increases less rapidly than nutrient demand for initiation of lactation which leads to mobilization of body reserves. Cows are losing body condition score and non-esterified fatty acids are released from adipose tissues and their plasma concentrations increased. During this period, dairy cows are also prone to liver steatosis because hepatic uptake of non-esterified fatty acids is greater than the amounts oxidized or secreted by the liver [33]. Accumulation of lipids in liver affects integrity and function of hepatic cells [33]; in response, liver parenchymal cells produce an acute-phase glycoprotein haptoglobulin [34]. Because a decrease in DLK1 can improved fatty acid oxidation from hepatocytes [25], an improved β-oxidation of non-esterified fatty acids in liver could help to reduce ketone body formation and plasma concentrations of β-hydroxybutyrate. The improvement in energy balance observed in cows receiving supplementary vitamin B9, alone or combined with vitamin B12, likely reduced the liver burden caused by mobilization of body fat reserves which could explain the changes in hepatic gene expression described above. For instance, the increase of LOXL4 and G0S2 strongly support that these treatments protect body fat from catabolism. Prevention of liver damage or improved liver performance is not only important for maintaining liver function but also for general health of high-yielding dairy cows.

Conclusion

In the present study, a supplement of vitamin B9, given alone or in combination with vitamin B12, reduced mobilization of body fat reserves and hepatic lipid catabolism in early lactation. Changes in expression of genes described above support the hypothesis that hepatic tissue integrity in early lactation was improved by these vitamin supplements.

Methods

Animals and treatments

For the purpose of the present study, biopsies of hepatic and mammary tissues were taken from 24 multiparous Holstein cows from the dairy herd at the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre (Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada) at the end of a larger study [9]. Care of cows followed the guidelines of the National Farm Animal Care Council (2009) [35]. Animals were kept in a tie-stall barn under 18:30 h of light per day (05:00 to 23:30 h) and milked twice daily (07:30 and 19:30 h). The experimental period began 3 weeks before the expected calving date and lasted until 9 weeks of lactation. The cows were fed ad libitum a close-up diet beginning 3 weeks before the expected date of calving until parturition and, then a lactation diet both formulated to meet or exceed the National Research Council (NRC) recommendations [36]. Long hay (0.5 kg) was given at 07:30 h and total mixed ration was served once daily at 08:30 h. Cows had free access to water.

Cows were assigned to 6 blocks of 4 animals each according to their 305-d milk production during the previous lactation. Within each block, cows were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: weekly intramuscular injections of 5 mL of either saline 0.9 % NaCl (Control group), 320 mg of pteroylmonoglutamic acid (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA; (Vitamin B9 group), 10 mg of cyanocobalamin (5 000 μg/mL, Vetoquinol, Lavaltrie, Quebec, Canada; (Vitamin B12 group) or 320 mg of pteroylmonoglutamic acid and 10 mg of cyanocobalamin (B9 + B12 group). Thus, there were 6 animals per treatment group.

Biological material collection and tissue handling

Mammary gland and hepatic tissues were obtained from the lactating dairy cows, 64 ± 3 days after calving. Biopsies were performed under local anesthesia. The process of hepatic biopsies uses ultrasound guidance to minimize the hemorrhagic risks [4]. Both procedures were approved by the Institutional Committee on Animal Care of the Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada according to the guidelines of the Canadian Coucil on Animal Care [37]. Tissues were immediately frozen into liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use.

Total RNA isolation and purification

Total RNA was extracted from hepatic and mammary tissues by using a QIAzol Lysis Reagent (QIAGEN Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada) following the original manufacturer’s protocol, with slight modifications. Briefly, frozen samples (100 mg of tissue) were homogenized in 2 mL of QIAzol Lysis Reagent on ice using a Tissue-Tearor. A volume of 600 μL QIAzol Lysis Reagent was added to 400 μL of homogenate; the mixture was vigorously vortexed and kept at room temperature for 5 min to promote dissociation of nucleoprotein complexes. A volume of 200 μL of chloroform was added; the mixture was shaken and left at room temperature for 3 min followed by a centrifugation at 12 000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C to remove lipids. After centrifugation, the aqueous fraction (upper layer) was taken and RNA was precipitated by adding an equal volume of 70 % ethanol. RNA was purified according to manufacturer’s procedure using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada), including on-column DNase digestion. The purity, concentration, and integrity of total RNA intended for qPCR were assessed. Purity of the RNA was evaluated by absorbance (A) readings (ratio of A260/A230 and A260/A280) using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, US). NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer was also used to measure the concentration. All RNA samples passed the quality control. The RNA Integrity Number calculated by the Bioanalyzer software at McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Center (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) ranged from 7.3 to 8.7.

Microarray

McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Center (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) performed the microarray analysis. Cyanine 3-labeled CTP complementary RNA (cRNA) was produced with 50 ng of total RNA using the Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit, according to manufacturer’s instructions (Agilent Technologies, Inc). The quality of cRNA was evaluated by capillary electrophoresis on 2100 Electrophoresis Bioanalyzer instrument (Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A total of 15 525 genes were analyzed via expression levels of 42 789 probes using the Agilent Bovine Genome Oligo Microarrays 4 × 44 K (G2519F-023647) (Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Labeling, hybridization, and raw data extraction were performed by McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Center (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, as previously described [38]. Hybridizations were performed by batch with samples randomly distributed. The hybridizations of microarrays were compared through a correlation matrix that enables the quick identification of poor and divergent replication (data not shown). Once the slides are scanned, the respective “.tif” image was examined using the Agilent Feature Extraction (FE) software. Scan image information is displayed in the Scan Image Properties for images that were generated using the Agilent Scanner. Then data are extracted with the FE software. A quality control (QC) report is generated for each sample. The FE version 10.7.3.1 with GE1_107_Sep09 protocol and grid associated with the selected type of chip 023647_D_F_20110614 were used. All microarray datasets passed all the quality criteria and were then downloaded into the FlexArray microarray analysis software (http://gqinnovationcenter.com/documents/technicalNotes/technicalNotes_GQ06.pdf). Array data have been submitted to the public databases and assigned Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession number is GSE77421.

FlexArray, a Bioconductor R based software, was developed by Génome Québec to provide researchers with a user-friendly interface for the analysis of microarray experiments. Raw microarray expression intensities were corrected for background using normexp, according to Ritchie et al. [39]. Between-array normalization was performed so that the background corrected intensities have similar distributions across the arrays. Comparison of the vitamin treatments with the control tissue was performed by Cyber-T, a version of the t-test that uses a Bayesian estimate of the within treatment variance [40, 41]. Up- or downregulated genes lists were analyzed on Protein ANalysis THrough Evolutionary Relationships (Panther) classification system [42].

Quantitative real time-PCR

Quantifications by real-time PCR (qPCR) following reverse transcription were performed as previously described [43] with minor modifications. The reverse transcription PCR reactions were performed with the SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies Inc., Burlington ON, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and using 500 ng of total RNA extracted from each of the 24 animals. An equivalent quantity of cDNA is synthesized in a final reaction volume of 20 μL, giving a concentration of 25 ng/μl of cDNA. A pool of cDNA intended to estimate the efficiencies primers, was made using the cDNA of each animal. Primers were designed for each gene using the Primer Express 3 software package (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies Corporation, Burlington, ON, Canada) using the reference sequence from the RefSeq database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information depository. Primers for a total of 34 genes for both tissues were designed. Optimizations of primers were performed for each gene by testing different concentrations of both forward and reverse primers, each ranging from 50 to 900 nM. Estimations of primer efficiencies were analyzed using the standard curves made from a serial of seven dilutions (1/7.5, 1/15, 1/30, 1/60, 1/120, 1/240, 1/480) of the pool of the cDNA samples (25 ng/μl of cDNA). As 3 μl of each dilution were used in a final reaction volume of 10 μl for qPCR, the concentrations used per dilution were: 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625, 0.03125 and 0.015625 (ng/μl). Additional file 1 provides experimental information and PCR amplification efficiency for all genes. The qPCR reactions (10 μL, final volume) were performed on 96 well plates using Fast SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) in a 7500 Fast Real Time-PCR System (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada) as the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR thermal cycling conditions comprised an initial 20 s denaturation step at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 3 s followed by an annealing/elongation period at 60 °C for 30 s. A dissociation step was included for all amplifications to confirm the presence of single discrete PCR products of the expected size. Twenty-five genes (14 from hepatic tissue data and 11 from mammary gland tissue data) were subject to qPCR validation because they were found differentially expressed by microarray as expressed by log2 of their fold change. In addition, in the mammary gland, four genes (FOLR1, ELF5, B4GALT1 and LALBA) were chosen because of their implication in the metabolic pathway involving vitamins B9 and B12. The expression of 5 putative reference genes, namely actin beta (ACTB), ubiquitously-expressed transcript (UXT), peptidylprolyl isomerase A (PPIA), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, zeta polypeptide (YWHAZ) was determined for all samples as recommended [4446]. All the 24 animals were used to perform the qPCR analysis of 34 genes for both tissues. Once the more stable genes were selected, the normalization factor was calculated using a geometrical average as recommended [45]. The combination of ACTB and PPIA was appropriate to normalize the data from hepatic tissue. The appropriated combination was UXT and PPIA to normalize the data from mammary gland.

Data analysis and statistics

Using FlexArray microarray analysis, a significant result at a P value < 0.05 after false discovery rate correction with a minimum of ± two-fold change in gene expression for the respective treatment group compared to control tissues was considered biologically interesting. Gene category over-representation analysis consists in grouping genes into categories by some common biological property and then tested to find categories that are over represented amongst the differentially expressed genes. Gene ontology describes and categorizes gene products in three non-overlapping domains of molecular biology [47]. Panther (http://pantherdb.org) is a visualisation browser of GO [48], using version 10 which included other organisms. Panther ranks proteins (and their genes) according to Family (and subfamily), Molecular function, Biological process and Pathway. The process of classification is extensively explained by Mi and colleagues [42]. Only significant differentially expressed genes were analysed by qPCR. Data from qPCR were analyzed using SAS Institute procedures (2008). Means were assumed to be different at P ≤ 0.05 and tended to differ at 0.05 < P ≥ 0.1. Normfinder indicated the interested combination of reference genes to normalize qPCR data.

Abbreviations

ECM, extracellular matrix components; GO, gene ontology; HPCs, hepatic progenitor cells; Panther, protein analysis through evolutionary relationships; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Véronique Roy for her assistance with tissue sampling, Catherine Thibault for coordinating the extraction step and the design of the qPCR assay, Gloria-Gabrielle Ortega-Delgado providing technical assistance for performing qPCR assays and Steve Méthot for statistical analysis.

Funding

The present project was publicly supported research within Agriculture and Agroalimentaire Canada (ACC) using hepatic and mammary tissue samples collected during a project funded by Novalait - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada - Fonds de recherche du Québec Nature et Technologies - Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.

Availability of data and materials

All microarray datasets were then downloaded into the FlexArray microarray analysis software (http://gqinnovationcenter.com/documents/technicalNotes/technicalNotes_GQ06.pdf). Array raw data have been submitted to the public databases. The following link (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE77421) provides access to all data. The assigned Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession number is GSE77421.

Authors’ contributions

BO, NB, MD and CLG contributed in the design of the study, interpretation of the results, writing of the manuscript, revision of its content and approval of the final version submitted for publication; MD realized the animal phase of the project; BO realized laboratory analyses; N. B. performed microarray analysis and supervised RT-PCR analyses; CLG was the principal investigator of the project. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Care of cows followed the guidelines of the National Farm Animal Care Council. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Committee on Animal Care of the Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada according to the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Consent to participate is not applicable because the study did not involve human subjects, human material or human data.

Additional file

Additional file 1: (32.7KB, docx)

Oligonucleotide primer sequences for quantitative PCR. (DOCX 32 kb)

Contributor Information

Bazoumana Ouattara, Phone: 819 565 9171, Email: bazouma.ouattara@upgc.edu.ci.

Nathalie Bissonnette, Phone: 819 780 7253, Email: Nathalie.Bissonnette@agr.gc.ca.

Melissa Duplessis, Phone: 514-459-3030, Email: mduplessis@valacta.com.

Christiane L. Girard, Phone: 819-780-7233, Email: Christiane.Girard@agr.gc.ca

References

  • 1.Lardinois CC, Mills RC, Elyehjem CA, Hart EB. Rumen synthesis of the vitamin B complex as influenced by ration composition. J Dairy Sci. 1944;27(7):579–583. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(44)92635-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Girard CL, Matte JJ. Effects of intramuscular injections of vitamin B12 on lactation performance of dairy cows fed dietary supplements of folic acid and rumen-protected methionine. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88(2):671–676. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72731-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Preynat A, Lapierre H, Thivierge MC, Palin MF, Matte JJ, Desrochers A, et al. Effects of supplements of folic acid, vitamin B12, and rumen-protected methionine on whole body metabolism of methionine and glucose in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92(2):677–689. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Graulet B, Matte JJ, Desrochers A, Doepel L, Palin MF, Girard CL. Effects of dietary supplements of folic acid and vitamin B12 on metabolism of dairy cows in early lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(7):3442–3455. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scott JM. Folate and vitamin B12. Proc Nutr Soc. 1999;58(2):441–448. doi: 10.1017/S0029665199000580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Girard CL, Matte JJ, Tremblay GF. Gestation and lactation of dairy cows: a role for folic acid? J Dairy Sci. 1995;78(2):404–411. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76649-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Girard CL, Matte JJ. Dietary supplements of folic acid during lactation: effects on the performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81(5):1412–1419. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75705-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Menzies KK, Lefevre C, Macmillan KL, Nicholas KR. Insulin regulates milk protein synthesis at multiple levels in the bovine mammary gland. Funct Integr Genomics. 2009;9(2):197–217. doi: 10.1007/s10142-008-0103-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Duplessis M. Impact d’un supplément combine d’acide folique et de vitamine B12 en période prépartum et en début de lactation chez la vache laitière. Université Laval 2014. PhD Thesis. Univ. Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada, p. 301.
  • 10.McEwen M, Reynolds K. Noninvasive detection of bilirubin using pulsatile absorption. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2006;29(1):78–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Larsen M, Kristensen NB. Precursors for liver gluconeogenesis in periparturient dairy cows. Animal. 2013;7(10):1640–1650. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113001171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Amaral DM, Veenhuizen JJ, Drackley JK, Cooley MH, McGilliard AD, Young JW. Metabolism of propionate, glucose, and carbon dioxide as affected by exogenous glucose in dairy cows at energy equilibrium. J Dairy Sci. 1990;73(5):1244–1254. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78789-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Danfaer A, Tetens V, Agergaard N. Review and an experimental study on the physiological and quantitative aspects of gluconeogenesis in lactating ruminants. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 1995;111(2):201–210. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(94)00242-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nafikov RA, Beitz DC. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in farm animals. J Nutr. 2007;137(3):702–705. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.3.702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grummer RR. Impact of changes in organic nutrient metabolism on feeding the transition dairy cow. J Anim Sci. 1995;73(9):2820–2833. doi: 10.2527/1995.7392820x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McCarthy SD, Waters SM, Kenny DA, Diskin MG, Fitzpatrick R, Patton J, et al. Negative energy balance and hepatic gene expression patterns in high-yielding dairy cows during the early postpartum period: a global approach. Physiol Genomics. 2010;42A(3):188–199. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00118.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Connor EE, Siferd S, Elsasser TH, Evock-Clover CM, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, et al. Effects of increased milking frequency on gene expression in the bovine mammary gland. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:362. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mi H, Muruganujan A, Casagrande JT, Thomas PD. Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(8):1551–1566. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jelnes P, Santoni-Rugiu E, Rasmussen M, Friis SL, Nielsen JH, Tygstrup N, et al. Remarkable heterogeneity displayed by oval cells in rat and mouse models of stem cell-mediated liver regeneration. Hepatology. 2007;45(6):1462–1470. doi: 10.1002/hep.21569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Falix FA, Aronson DC, Lamers WH, Gaemers IC. Possible roles of DLK1 in the Notch pathway during development and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(6):988–995. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhu NL, Asahina K, Wang J, Ueno A, Lazaro R, Miyaoka Y, et al. Hepatic stellate cell-derived delta-like homolog 1 (DLK1) protein in liver regeneration. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(13):10355–10367. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.312751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tsukamoto H. Metabolic reprogramming and cell fate regulation in alcoholic liver disease. Pancreatology. 2015;15(4 Suppl):S61–65. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li H, Cui ML, Chen TY, Xie HY, Cui Y, Tu H, et al. Serum DLK1 is a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(11):8399–8404. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3607-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pan RL, Xiang LX, Wang P, Liu XY, Nie L, Huang W, et al. Low-molecular-weight fibroblast growth factor 2 attenuates hepatic fibrosis by epigenetic down-regulation of Delta-like1. Hepatology. 2015;61(5):1708–1720. doi: 10.1002/hep.27649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee YH, Yun MR, Kim HM, Jeon BH, Park BC, Lee BW, et al. Exogenous administration of DLK1 ameliorates hepatic steatosis and regulates gluconeogenesis via activation of AMPK. Int J Obes (Lond) 2016;40(2):356–365. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Busnadiego O, Gonzalez-Santamaria J, Lagares D, Guinea-Viniegra J, Pichol-Thievend C, Muller L, et al. LOXL4 is induced by transforming growth factor beta1 through Smad and JunB/Fra2 and contributes to vascular matrix remodeling. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(12):2388–2401. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00036-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hayashi K, Fong KS, Mercier F, Boyd CD, Csiszar K, Hayashi M. Comparative immunocytochemical localization of lysyl oxidase (LOX) and the lysyl oxidase-like (LOXL) proteins: changes in the expression of LOXL during development and growth of mouse tissues. J Mol Histol. 2004;35(8–9):845–855. doi: 10.1007/s10735-004-2340-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang X, Zhang X, Heckmann BL, Lu X, Liu J. Relative contribution of adipose triglyceride lipase and hormone-sensitive lipase to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)-induced lipolysis in adipocytes. J Biol Chem. 2010;286(47):40477–40485. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.257923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang X, Lu X, Lombes M, Rha GB, Chi YI, Guerin TM, et al. The G(0)/G(1) switch gene 2 regulates adipose lipolysis through association with adipose triglyceride lipase. Cell Metab. 2011;11(3):194–205. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gessner DK, Schlegel G, Keller J, Schwarz FJ, Ringseis R, Eder K. Expression of target genes of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 in the liver of dairy cows in the transition period and at different stages of lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96(2):1038–1043. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hsiao CP, Araneta M, Wang XM, Saligan LN. The association of IFI27 expression and fatigue intensification during localized radiation therapy: implication of a para-inflammatory bystander response. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(8):16943–16957. doi: 10.3390/ijms140816943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Qian P, He XC, Paulson A, Li Z, Tao F, Perry JM, et al. The Dlk1-Gtl2 Locus Preserves LT-HSC Function by Inhibiting the PI3K-mTOR Pathway to Restrict Mitochondrial Metabolism. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18(2):214–228. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bobe G, Young JW, Beitz DC. Invited review: pathology, etiology, prevention, and treatment of fatty liver in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2004;87(10):3105–3124. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73446-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Katoh N. Relevance of apolipoproteins in the development of fatty liver and fatty liver-related peripartum diseases in dairy cows. J Vet Med Sci. 2002;64(4):293–307. doi: 10.1292/jvms.64.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.NFACC . Code of practice for the care and handling of dairy cattle. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Dairy Farmers of Canada and National Farm Animal care Council (DFCNFCC); 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle . Seventh Revised Edition, 2001. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001. p. 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.CCAC . CCAC guidelines on: laboratory animal facilities - characteristics, design, and development. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rudkowska I, Paradis AM, Thifault E, Julien P, Tchernof A, Couture P, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic signatures of an n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids supplementation in a normolipidemic/normocholesterolemic Caucasian population. J Nutr Biochem. 2013;24(1):54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ritchie ME, Silver J, Oshlack A, Holmes M, Diyagama D, Holloway A, et al. A comparison of background correction methods for two-colour microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(20):2700–2707. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Baldi P, Long AD. A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t -test and statistical inferences of gene changes. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(6):509–519. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kayala MA, Baldi P. Cyber-T web server: differential analysis of high-throughput data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Web Server issue):W553–559. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mi H, Poudel S, Muruganujan A, Casagrande JT, Thomas PD. PANTHER version 10: expanded protein families and functions, and analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D336–342. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Levesque-Sergerie JP, Duquette M, Thibault C, Delbecchi L, Bissonnette N. Detection limits of several commercial reverse transcriptase enzymes: impact on the low- and high-abundance transcript levels assessed by quantitative RT-PCR. BMC Mol Biol. 2007;8:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-8-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lisowski P, Pierzchala M, Goscik J, Pareek CS, Zwierzchowski L. Evaluation of reference genes for studies of gene expression in the bovine liver, kidney, pituitary, and thyroid. J Appl Genet. 2008;49(4):367–372. doi: 10.1007/BF03195635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bionaz M, Loor JJ. Identification of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in the bovine mammary gland during the lactation cycle. Physiol Genomics. 2007;29(3):312–319. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00223.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kadegowda AK, Bionaz M, Thering B, Piperova LS, Erdman RA, Loor JJ. Identification of internal control genes for quantitative polymerase chain reaction in mammary tissue of lactating cows receiving lipid supplements. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92(5):2007–2019. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, Lomax J, Ashburner M, Foulger R, et al. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Database issue):D258–261. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Thomas PD, Campbell MJ, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Karlak B, Daverman R, et al. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res. 2003;13(9):2129–2141. doi: 10.1101/gr.772403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All microarray datasets were then downloaded into the FlexArray microarray analysis software (http://gqinnovationcenter.com/documents/technicalNotes/technicalNotes_GQ06.pdf). Array raw data have been submitted to the public databases. The following link (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE77421) provides access to all data. The assigned Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession number is GSE77421.


Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES