Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1984 Mar;37(3):332–334. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.3.332

Comparison of the sensitivity of three methods for the rapid identification of Cryptococcus neoformans.

J Cohen
PMCID: PMC498710  PMID: 6199376

Abstract

The sensitivity of three methods for the rapid identification of Cryptococcus neoformans was compared. These were: direct microscopy of india ink preparations, acridine orange staining followed by fluorescence microscopy and detection of cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen by latex agglutination. The overall limit of detection was 3.5 +/- 5.4 X 10(3) CFU/ml (mean +/- SD, n = 27). When different strains were studied, no single method was consistently superior. False positive results were rare (two of 162 observations, 1.2%) but there were eight false negatives (4.9%), five of which were with acridine orange. Tests such as these are an invaluable aid in the rapid diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis but they cannot be relied upon to detect low grade infections.

Full text

PDF
332

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BUTLER W. T., ALLING D. W., SPICKARD A., UTZ J. P. DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY FINDINGS IN CRYPTOCOCCAL MENINGITIS, A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF FORTY PATIENTS. N Engl J Med. 1964 Jan 9;270:59–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196401092700201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennedsen J., Larsen S. O. Examination for tubercle bacili by fluorescence microscopy. Scand J Respir Dis. 1966;47(2):114–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goodman J. S., Kaufman L., Koenig M. G. Diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis. Value of immunologic detection of cryptococcal antigen. N Engl J Med. 1971 Aug 19;285(8):434–436. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197108192850804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gordon M. A., Vedder D. K. Serologic tests in diagnosis and prognosis of cryptococcosis. JAMA. 1966 Sep 19;197(12):961–967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grossgebauer K. Detection of Cryptococcus neoformans capsule using fluorescent, mucopolysaccharide-binding dyes. Klin Wochenschr. 1980 Sep 15;58(18):943–945. doi: 10.1007/BF01477052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hay R. J., Mackenzie D. W., Campbell C. K., Philpot C. M. Cryptococcosis in the United Kingdom and the Irish Republic: an analysis of 69 cases. J Infect. 1980 Mar;2(1):13–22. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(80)91704-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kwon-Chung K. J. A new genus, filobasidiella, the perfect state of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mycologia. 1975 Nov-Dec;67(6):1197–1200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kwon-Chung K. J., Polacheck I., Bennett J. E. Improved diagnostic medium for separation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans (serotypes A and D) and Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii (serotypes B and C). J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):535–537. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.535-537.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Perfect J. R., Durack D. T., Gallis H. A. Cryptococcemia. Medicine (Baltimore) 1983 Mar;62(2):98–109. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198303000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Salkin I. F., Hurd N. J. New medium for differentiation of Cryptococcus neoformans serotype pairs. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jan;15(1):169–171. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.169-171.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Severance P. J., Kauffman C. A. Diagnosis of cryptococcosis: comparison of various methods to detect Cryptococcus neoformans. Mykosen. 1983 Jan;26(1):29–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1983.tb03934.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES