Abstract
Crop wild relatives are valuable resources for future genetic improvement. Here, we report the de novo genome assembly of Musa itinerans, a disease-resistant wild banana relative in subtropical China. The assembled genome size was 462.1 Mb, covering 75.2% of the genome (615.2Mb) and containing 32, 456 predicted protein-coding genes. Since the approximate divergence around 5.8 million years ago, the genomes of Musa itinerans and Musa acuminata have shown conserved collinearity. Gene family expansions and contractions enrichment analysis revealed that some pathways were associated with phenotypic or physiological innovations. These include a transition from wood to herbaceous in the ancestral Musaceae, intensification of cold and drought tolerances, and reduced diseases resistance genes for subtropical marginally distributed Musa species. Prevalent purifying selection and transposed duplications were found to facilitate the diversification of NBS-encoding gene families for two Musa species. The population genome history analysis of M. itinerans revealed that the fluctuated population sizes were caused by the Pleistocene climate oscillations, and that the formation of Qiongzhou Strait might facilitate the population downsizing on the isolated Hainan Island about 10.3 Kya. The qualified assembly of the M. itinerans genome provides deep insights into the lineage-specific diversification and also valuable resources for future banana breeding.
Crop wild relatives (CWRs) are composed of progenitors and more or less distantly related species of crops1. They were gene pools for many desirable traits including yields, nutrition quality, resistances to pests and diseases, and abiotic tolerances to drought, salt, cold etc. Due to substantial loss of genetic variations during domestication, several domestication syndromes such as disease susceptibility were common to many crop species. To help cope with these challenges, plant breeders have resorted to CWRs, and made significant advances in the past 30 years2. However, due to climate change and human-mediated disturbances, many of the CWRs were threatened and poorly conserved, so it’s imperative to take immediate action to collect, conserve and evaluate them3. In recent years, the coined term ‘super-domestication’ referred to the process of obtaining target traits by manipulation on crops or CWRs via genetic and genomic approaches4. Thus, genome sequencing of CWRs will facilitate the discovery of useful alleles or key genomic elements that can contribute to the improvement of targeted traits5. Banana is one of the most favoured fruits worldwide, and also an important staple food for people in some African and Latin American countries. Bananas are diploid or triploid hybrids between Musa acuminata (A genome) and M. balbisiana (B genome) or hybrids between subspecies of M. acuminata. Originally, domesticated in Southeast Asia about 7000 years ago6, the seedless and parthenocarpic hybrids have been thereafter widely propagated by vegetative reproduction. Long-standing human selections on these spontaneous triploids or diploids have contributed to the diversity of cultivated bananas7. Today, one triploid subgroup (AAA genome group), namely Cavendish that originated from a single clone, contributes to almost half of the world’s banana production. However, an emerging strain of Fusarium wilt disease, Tropical Race 4′ (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4, Foc-TR4) has caused devastating damages to this cultivar. There are about 60 species in the Musa genus, and some of them have been utilized in banana resistance improvement, for instance, a wild non-edible accession of M. acuminata ssp. burmannica was once extensively used in banana breeding for its resistances to black Sigatoka and some races of Fusarium wilt2. Therefore, wild relatives potentially harbour beneficial alleles for cultivated crop, and are very important resources for future banana breeding strategies.
In 2012, the genome of M. acuminata ssp malaccensis (A genome), one progenitor of the cultivated banana, was sequenced and the genome evolution peculiarities of the Musaceae in the monocots were thus revealed8. Recently, the draft genome of the other progenitor of banana, M. balbisiana (B genome) has been released9. With the ever-decreasing costs of genome sequencing, it is becoming routine to sequence more genomes even within a genus, which can elucidate lineage-specific diversification mechanisms and genome diversities, as the case of rice10. Being one of the most valued crop species worldwide, the additional genome resources of banana are required to reveal hidden genetic diversity for future crop improvements. In this study, we contributed the draft genome sequence for M. itinerans, a close relative to both banana progenitors with wide distribution across subtropical China11. Musa itinerans var itinerans, known also as Yunnan banana, is native to south-east Asia and can be found in moist ravines to mountainous areas up to 2200 m12. In China, it is usually found in secondary tropical rainforests. It grows fast and can produce long rhizome with sucker emerging more than 2 meters from the mother plant, explaining its name origin. Interestingly, it was shown as one of the most Foc-TR4 resistant and cold tolerant species in the Musa genus13, providing valuable resource for the disease resistance and hardiness improvement in banana breeding. M. itinerans also displays interesting agronomic characteristic such as rapid fruit maturation (personal observation, Häkkinen M). Moreover, the studies will facilitate the understanding of the lineage-specific genome evolution in the Musa genus.
Results and Discussion
Genome sequencing and annotation
One individual plant of M. itinerans collected from Baoting County on Hainan Island and transplanted in South China Botanical Garden was sequenced by whole-genome shotgun strategy on the Illumina Hiseq2000 platform (Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Fig. 1). A total of 74.2 Gb clean reads (approximately 120.7 fold coverage) derived from five libraries with insertion size ranging from 170 bp to 10 kb were used (Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Note 2). Hierarchical assembly implemented in SOAPdenovo214 yielded a draft genome of 462.1 Mb, representing 75.2% of the estimated genome size (615.2 Mb) based on a 17-mer statistics (Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Note 3, 4). In total, the assembly comprised 7194 scaffolds (above 2 kb) with N50 of 192 kb, and 103,534 contigs (above 100 bp) with N50 of 33.9 kb (Table 1, Supplementary Table 3). The post-assembly quality evaluations showed that the distribution of GC content was concentrated around 0.388, well in accord with that of the published genome M. acuminata8, and the average base coverage was about 92× (Supplementary Figs 3 and 4). The total heterozygous rate was estimated to be 0.25% based on the ratio of the number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms to the overall genome length, after excluding ‘N’ sites of assembly gaps (Supplementary Note 4). Using the package CEGMA15, the complete and partial coverage of core eukaryotic gene sets (CEGMA) for the M. itinerans genome assembly were 79.8% and 94.4% respectively, which were very close to the M. acuminata genome assembly (81.9% and 93.6% respectively) (Supplementary Table 4). Thus, we obtained a qualified draft genome assembly, which should be valuable genomic resources to support banana breeding.
Table 1. Statistics of the assembly of the Musa itinerans genome.
Statistics of genome assembly | Value |
---|---|
Assembled genome size (Mb) | 462.1 |
Effective genome size (Mb)a | 422.1 |
Sequencing depth (×) | 120 |
Filtered data (Gb) | 74.2 |
N ratio in assembled genome (%) | 8.6 |
Number of scaffolds (scaffold’s length >=2 kb) | 7194 |
Contig N50 (bp)b | 33,903 |
Scaffold N50 (bp)b | 192,092 |
GC content (%)c | 38.8 |
Repeat rate (%) | 38.9 |
Predicted protein-coding genes | 32,456 |
Sequence anchored on chromosome(%) | 57.0 |
Genes anchored on chromosome(%) | 80.4 |
aEffective genome size, without calculating Ns.
bN50 values of the genome assembly were calculated using the fragments larger than 100 bp.
cGC, guanine-cytosine.
cGC, guanine-cytosine.
Using both homology-search against the RepBase library16, and de novo predictions with RepeatModeler approaches, 38.95% (179.99 Mbp) of the Musa itinerans genome were predicted to contain repetitive elements, somewhat higher than that of M. acuminata (35.43%, 167.59 Mbp) (Supplementary Table 5), and the higher level of repetitive elements for M. itinerans might be caused by using heterozygous diploids instead of the double haploid used for M. acuminata. Of the most abundant retrotransposons, long-terminal repeats (LTRs) were predominant in M. itinerans, and the two most common subfamilies LTR/Copia (16.7%) and LTR/Gypsy (16.3%) were almost in equal proportions in M. itinerans. The two peaks around sequence divergence rate were 20% and 30%, indicating that LTRs families in M. itinerans underwent two rounds of expansion events (Supplementary Fig. 5). Using the intact 5′- and 3′- LTR sequences of the retrotransposons within the genome, the insertion time of these LTRs for both Musa species were estimated, and quite large proportions of them burst after the divergence between M. itinerans and M. acuminata (approximately 5.8 million years ago (Mya), estimated by this study), suggestive of high turnover rates of retrotransposable elements in the Musa genomes. One recent burst of LTRs occurring at about 0.2 Mya in M. itinerans but not in M. acuminata, showed rapid dynamic evolution for these repeat elements (Supplementary Fig. 6). For M. itinerans, only 3.15% of the genome was the class II elements, and the compositions resembled those of M. acuminata, in which CACTA and Mariner, the most common superfamilies in other plants were absent. Instead, two super-families CMC (0.97%) and hAT (0.90%) were the most common types (Supplementary Table 5). Using the protein sequences of six species (M. acuminata, Phoenix dactylifera, Oryza sativa, Sorghum bicolor, Zea mays, and Arabidopsis thaliana) as queries against the repeat-masked assemblies, 32,456 protein-coding genes were predicted with an average coding sequence length of 1065 bp and 5.2 exons per gene (Supplementary Table 6). For these predicted genes, 86.9% of them were annotated with the SWISS-PROT, KEGG, GO, InterPro and TrEMBL databases (Supplementary Table 7). In addition to protein-coding genes, other non-coding RNA including 345 microRNA, 977 tRNA, 278 rRNA, and 299 snRNA were also identified (Supplementary Table 8).
Genome evolution
Gene family expansions and contractions
We conducted protein-based clustering with OrthoMCL among M. itinerans and other eight species, namely, M. acuminata, M. balbisiana, Phoenix dactylifera, Elaeis guineensis, Oryza sativa, Sorghum bicolor, Vitis vinifera, and Arabidopsis thaliana. Of the 28,524 predicted protein sequences (>100 amino-acids in length) in M. itinerans, 26,955 (94.5%) were assigned into 16,742 gene families with 1201 single-copy orthologs, and 177 gene families were found to be unique to M. itinerans (Supplementary Table 9, Supplementary Fig. 7). A 5-way comparison of the three Musa species and two closely related Arecaceae species P. dactylifera, and E. guineensis showed that 7810 gene families were shared among them, and 2723 uniquely shared gene families between the three Musa genomes (Fig. 1a). M. itinerans shared more gene families with M. auminata (2727 gene families) than with M. balbisiana (140 gene families), which were suggestive of higher similarity for the latter two species. The unique gene families of M. itinerans among the five species were significantly enriched for 40 GO terms and involved in some essential functional categories such as DNA polymerase activity (GO: 0034061, P = 1.56e-9, hyper-geometric test), endoribonuclease activity (GO: 0016891, P = 5.12e-9, hyper-geometric test), and ribonuclease activity (GO:0004540, P = 4.15e-7, hyper-geometric test) (Supplementary Table 10). Twelve genes were significantly mapped on the ribosome pathway (ko03010, P = 4.64e-5, hyper-geometric test) (Supplementary Table 11), and it has been suggested that ribosomes might play some roles in the intrinsic regulation of a subset of mRNAs translation with unique cis-regulatory elements17. The followed proteasome pathway (ko03050, P = 1.77e-5, hyper-geometric test) involved the degradation of abnormal or damaged proteins in the cell, and played crucial roles in response to diverse intracellular signals and changing environmental conditions such infection, heat and cold etc18. Other enriched pathways fell into diverse categories with development process, growth, response to biotic or abiotic stresses, such as plant hormone signal transduction (ko04075), inositol phosphate metabolism (ko00562), fatty acid biosynthesis (ko00061), plant-pathogen interaction (ko04626), and starch and sucrose metabolism (ko00500) etc. (Supplementary Table S11). Overall, these unique gene families of M. itinerans might also give some hints on how a subtropical marginally distributed species coped with the challenging environmental conditions.
Comparison of orthologous gene families among nine related species revealed that 2870 expanded and 1032 contracted gene families in the ancestor of the three Musa species (Fig. 1b). The expanded gene families were enriched in 29 pathways, of which the most striking expansions were associated with phagosome (ko04145, hyper-geometric test, P = 2.18e-20), and plant-pathogen interaction (ko04626, hyper-geometric test, P = 1.11e-19) (Supplementary Table 12). Phagosome biogenesis was a key process in tissue remodeling, clearing apoptotic cells, and restricting the spread of intracellular pathogens19, together with the plant-pathogen interaction pathway (ko04626), both of which provided some clues on how tropical emergent taxa coped with the intrinsic or exogenous biotic stresses. Besides these two important functional categories, the remaining 27 pathways involved in many other important component biogenesis processes, and might be associated with some phenotypic or physiological innovations in the ancestral Musa species (Supplementary Table 12). In contrast, the ancestral Musa species lost fewer gene families, and only 15 pathways were significantly over-represented (Supplementary Table 13). One noteworthy pathway, phenylalanine metabolism (ko00360, P = 3.44e-05, hyper-geometric test) was considered to be a key step in the lignin biosynthesis of vascular plants, and the contraction of this pathway might perturb the lignin biosynthesis and cell-wall architecture20, thus might result in the crucial transition from a woody to herbaceous disposition in the ancestors of Musa species. As one of the most marginally distributed Musa species in subtropical areas, 21 expanded and 24 contracted pathways were enriched for M. itinerans (Supplementary Tables 14 and15), some of which were in accordance with the release from biotic-stresses such as pathogens (ABC transporter21, ko02010, P = 1.25e-17, hyper-geometric test; plant-pathogen interaction, ko04626, P = 2.28e-9, hyper-geometric test), and intensification of abiotic stresses such as drought and cold (phagosome19, ko04145, P = 6.61e-24, hyper-geometric test; amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism22, ko00520, P = 8.13e-13, hyper-geometric test).
Genome duplication and divergence
According to a calibrated divergence time of 187.9 Mya (95% confidence interval:124.0~248.4 Mya) between Arabidopsis and sorghum23, the divergence time between M. itinerans and M. acuminata was estimated to be 5.8 Mya (95% confidence interval: 3.4~9.0 Mya) based on four-fold degenerated sites (4DTv sites) of 1201 single-copy orthologs, and the ancestor of M. itinerans and M. acuminata diverged with M. balbisiana about 8.3 Mya (95% confidence interval: 4.8~13.1 Mya), and Musaceae and Arecaceae coalesced to 120.9 Mya (95% confidence interval 73.4~181.2 Mya) (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 8).
Using SynMap, a web-based tool on the plant comparative genome platform CoGe (https://genomevolution.org/CoGe/), syntenic regions between M. itinerans and M. acuminata were generated. Based on the collinear blocks between M. itinerans and M. acuminata, 26,670 genes, comprising of 82.5% of the M. itinerans gene sets distributed on 1043 scaffolds, were oriented and anchored to the 11 linkage groups (Supplementary Fig. 9, Supplementary Table 16). The global view of the genome M. itinerans including gene density, GC content distribution, repeat elements distribution were also plotted along the pseudo-chromosomes (Fig. 2), and it showed that these genes unevenly distributed among given window slides (P = 0, Chi-square test), and positively correlated with the GC content significantly (P = 2.2e-16, Spear’s rank correlation rho = 0.35), as predicted by GC content and gene density24. Using the MCScanX Program25, 510 syntenic blocks covered 36.25% of gene repertoire of M. itinerans were identified, with average number of 13, ranging from 6 to 164 (Fig. 2f); and 695 syntenic blocks composed of 36.10% of the final gene set in M. acuminata were found (Supplementary Fig. 10). Based on the distributions of synonymous substitutions rate (Ks) of these syntenic orthologous and paralogous gene pairs, the speciation and paleoploidization events in the Musa genus were inferred. When following an average Ks of 3.47 per 109 years for nuclear genes in the Zingiberales8, M. itinerans and M. acuminata diverged approximately about 5.8 million years ago with peak Ks around 0.04 (Fig. 3). This divergence time estimation was consistent with that based on the phylogeny of 1201 single copy nuclear genes among nine plant species (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 8). For both Musa species, one peak around Ks 0.40~0.42 for intragenomic syntenic paralogs indicated an ancient genome duplication event occurred about 57.6~61.0 Mya, which was consistent with the polyploidization explosions in many plant species around Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary26. According to the ancestral syntenic blocks inferences in Musa8, this genome duplication should correspond to the two in separate successive duplication events (α/β) in M. acuminata.
Evolution of NBS and MYB gene families
Following the method described in D’Hont et al.8, 62, 93, 117 NBS-encoding genes were identified in the genomes of M. itinerans, M. balbisiana, M. acuminata, respectively (Supplementary Table 17). The decreasing number of NBS genes was consistent with the latitudinal ascending of the three species. During the transition from humid tropical to cool subtropical habitats, some NBS related genes would be less numerous due to relaxed selection constraints on them. The absence of Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR)-like (TIR-NBS types) in the three Musa species was consistent with previous reports in monocots27, and these NBS genes were distributed unevenly among the 11 chromosomes with skewed distributions on chromosome 3, 6, 9, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 11). A large proportion of the NBS-encoding genes were singletons, and only a few of them clustered into gene families (Supplementary Table 17, Supplementary Fig. 12). The predominant transposed duplication mode for the NBS-encoding genes might contribute to the widespread singletons (Supplementary Tables 18 and 19), which was prone to cause drastic gene structural divergence and function diversification28. Transposed duplication modes were found to be responsible for the proliferation of other important gene families including MADS-box, F-box, B3 transcription factors in Brassicales29. In addition, transposed duplications were observed to span wider time scales than other duplication modes in both Musa species (Supplementary Fig. 13). With duplication ages in terms of Ks ranged from 0.01 to 5.50 with average 1.59 for M. itinerans, and from 0.02 to 3.93 with average 0.83 for M. acuminata, vast majority of the NBS-encoding genes were duplicated well prior to the divergence of M. itinerans and M. acuminata (Ks = 0.04), hence, the ancient ages of these duplicated NBS-encoding genes were not in accordance with the classic arm-race model, which predicted a high turnover rate and predominant young NBS-encoding genes within a genome30,31. Ka/Ks (nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution ratio) values of most duplicated pairs (segmental duplication, tandem duplication, proximate duplication, transposed duplication) within both genomes were less than 1, indicating that purifying selection played an essential role in the maintenance of intra-genomic diversity of these NBS-encoding genes in Musa, as the cases in chestnut32, sorghum33, Solanum34. In our comparative studies in Musa, the NBS-encoding gene repertoire seemed to be associated with their specific habitat shift.
Transcription factor (TF) genes for the two Musa species were identified by blast against known transcription factor gene families of related species, as well as homology prediction using all the known transcription factor proteins to blast against the M. itinerans genome. In total, 3176 and 2898 putative transcription factor genes, from 58 families, were identified for M. itinerans and M. acuminata, respectively (Supplementary Table 20). These numbers represent 9.8% and 7.9% of the 32,456 and 36,542 predicted protein-coding loci. Among the 58 transcription factor families identified, MYB, AP2, Dof, G2-like, SBP, HD-zip, WOX, RAV, LBD and SAP were over-represented in both Musa species relative to other taxa (Supplementary Fig. 14). Similarly to M. acuminata, the M. itinerans genome contains a large number of TFs that can be explained by the 3 rounds of specific WGD in the Zingiberales order8.
The MYB family was the largest transcription factor family in the two Musa species. With the number of repeats in the N-terminal conserved MYB DNA-binding domain, the MYB super-family can been categorized into four classes, 1R-, R2R3-, 3R-, and 4R-MYB, and the largest one R2R3 MYB was plant specific and key regulators in metabolism and responses to biotic and abiotic stress, also in flowering or fruit development35. About 292 and 304 MYB genes were identified in the genomes of M. acuminata and M. itinerans after manual inspection, respectively (Supplementary Table 21, Supplementary Fig. 15), and 92.1% and 93.4% of them were R2R3-type MYB genes, and much higher than in Arabidopsis (56.8%) and rice (70.1%)36. The extensive collinearity between M. itinerans and M. acuminata for these MYB gene pairs was observed (Supplementary Fig. 16a). The intragenomic duplicated MYB gene pairs also showed good synteny and relatively even distribution across chromosomes (Supplementary Fig. 16b,c). For M. acuminata, this gene family arose primarily by segmental duplications (about 186 gene pairs) with median Ks = 0.57 and followed by transposed duplications with median Ks = 0.89 (about 97 gene pairs), both of which were prior to the ancient α/β whole genome duplication events (Ks = 0.40~0.42) in Musaceae (Supplementary Table 22). The MYB TFs’ gene families are essential to plant morphogenesis and diverse physiological processes, and the gene balance hypothesis assumed that these regulating gene families were dosage sensitive and robust to gene loss after whole genome duplication events37.About 89.7% of these segmental duplicated gene pairs were under purifying selection (with Ka/Ks < 1), followed by transposed duplications (about 97 gene pairs, 84.6% of them with Ka/Ks < 1). Under this scenario, purifying selections were expected to wipe out deleterious mutations and stabilize the MYB TFs gene repertoire for their essential functions. Similar evolutionary patterns were observed in M. itinerans (Supplementary Table 23), indicating that the conservative evolutionary pattern of MYB transcription factor families in the Musaceae family.
Demographic history of M. itinerans
To infer the demographic history of M. itinerans, each individual from three populations along different latitudes were sampled and re-sequenced in high depth (HN: 71.0-fold coverage; LC: 48.4-fold coverage; YC: 54.8-fold coverage) (Supplementary Note1). Using the pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent (PSMC) model38, the population size changes of the three populations were inferred respectively. The PSMC model estimated the coalescent time distributions between two alleles across all chromosomes based on the density of heterozygous sites across the diploid genome of a single individual, which in turn can be transformed into effective population size (Ne) since the inverse relationship between the effective population size and coalescent rate. The population history analysis of each individual from one population depicted the nearly identical trajectory (Fig. 4). Using a generation time of one year and mutation rate 1.30 × 10−8 substitution rate per site per year39, the genomic variations of the three populations coalesced between 3Ma and 300 kya. Since approximately 150 Kya, the Ne of the marginal ancestral HN population (HN population, Hainan, China) was substantial less than either of the two central populations (LC, Lechang population, northern Guangdong province, China; YC, Yangchun population. southern Guangdong, China), and this spatial pattern of genetic variations was consistent with theoretical prediction40,41. The effective population size of the three populations increased since 300 kya and lasted until 70 kya for the HN population and about 20 kya for the two continental populations. During the Pleistocene cycles of glacial and interglacial episodes, frequent population bottlenecks and subsequent expansions were expected to reduce the effective population sizes, however, population migrations and concomitant admixtures during expansions among highly heterogeneous populations might lead to increased Ne42 on the other hand, the heterogeneous topography in South China would result in the persistent population substructure, which was also possible for the elevated Ne during the glacial and interglacial cycles. It’s possible that the counter effect of admixtures between populations of M. itinerans overrode that of the population bottleneck until the progressive disappearance of population heterogeneities at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, c.a 18–20 Kya). However, due to genetic deficiency or less frequent admixtures, the isolated HN population showed more rapid decay of heterogeneity and earlier shrinkage of Ne than either of the continental populations (Fig. 4). The final formation of the Qiongzhou Strait was in the Middle Holocene when marine strata transgressed the original lowland, and the Hainan Island was completely isolated from Leizhou Peninsula43, so an additional Ne reduction of the HN Island population was observed at the time 10.3 Kya.
Conclusion
Genome sequencing of the wild banana Musa itinerans, one of the most disease-resistant wild banana species, provides invaluable genetic resources for future banana genetic improvement. The M. itinerans diverged from M. acuminata only 5.8 Mya, and exhibited extensive collinearity between them, but the two species occupy distinct habitats, which provides an unpreceded chance to unravel the diversification within the Musa genus. Resorting to lineage-specific gene family expansions and contractions approaches, a batch of candidate genes categorized into diverse pathways or GO terms were inferred to be associated with some peculiar traits. However, more delicate experiments were required to clarify their roles in the physiological or phenotypic innovations, as one of the most disease resistant and cold hardy species in the Musa genus, the gene repertoire space of M. itinerans should be mined in the future. The non-synonymous to synonymous ratio Ka/Ks of <1 for most NBS-encoding gene family revealed pervasive purifying selections, together with the ancient duplication ages, both in support of the trench-warfare model hypothesis and against the classic arms-race model. A similar evolution pattern was also observed in the MYB transcription factor family, in which the purifying selection wiped out deleterious mutations and stabilize the MYB TFs’ gene repertoire for their essential functions. Demographic history has a profound effect on the genetic diversity of extant species. The isolated HN population of M. itinerans was more prone to genetic loss during glacial and interglacial cycles than the counterpart mainland populations, in which admixture differentially buffered against genetic loss. Furthermore, the detailed scenarios of demographic history for this marginally distributed species will be revealed with more extensive sampling and population genome resequencing studies.
Methods
Sampling preparation and Sequencing
Natural populations of M. itinerans are distributed in subtropical China, and individual leaves of M. itinerans were harvested and immediately storied with sillica-gel in the field (the source of material see Supplementary Notes 1). The total genomic DNA was extracted with the CTAB (cetyl trimethylammonium bromide) method, and qualified with A260/280 ratio and agarose gel electrophoresis for further use. To obtain a high-quality reference genome, we sequenced one individual of M. itinerans from Hainan population using a whole-genome shotgun sequencing strategy. Paired and mate-pair Illumina genomic DNA libraries with varying insert size (180 bp, 500 bp, 2 kb, 5 kb, and 10 kb) were constructed following the manufacturer’s instructions. All the libraries were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq2000 platform. Raw reads were subject to the removals of PCR duplicates, adaptor sequences, and contaminants of bacterial or viruses. The processed high-quality reads were assembled into contigs and scaffolds using SOAPdenovo2 package14 and gaps were filled using Gapcloser (version 1.12, http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapdenovo.html). The reference genome size of M. itinerans was estimated based on the K-mer frequency distribution analysis (details for Supplementary Note 2). Two individuals each from the YC and LC populations were sampled and sequenced using a paired-end library size of 500 bp with >30-fold coverage.
Genome annotation
For the draft genome of M. itinerans, interspersed repeats were identified using RepeatMasker v3.30 (http://www.repeatmasker.org) and homolog research for the Repbase database16. Repeat proteins were characterized using RepeatProteinMask v3.30 with default parameters, de novo interspersed repeats were annotated using RepeatModeler (http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatModeler.html). Tandem repeats in the genome of M. itinerans were screened using Tandem Repeat Finder v4.0444. Next, a homology searching approach was used to identify protein-coding genes. We obtained the protein sequences of Musa acuminata v1 from the Banana Genome Hub45 and Phoenix dactylifera DPV01, Oryza sativa IRGSP-1.0, Sorghum bicolor v3.1, Zea mays, and Arabidopsis thaliana TAIR10 from Phytozome (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov) or related databases (Supplementary Note 5) and then blasted against the repeat-masked genome assembly of M. itinerans using TBLASTN46 with percentage identity over 70% and coverage not less than 50%. Gene models were predicted based on these alignments using Genewise47. De novo gene predictions were performed using Augustus48 and GENSCAN49. Both sets of genes were integrated using GLEAN50. The annotations of the final gene sets were obtained by searching against the protein database KEGG51, SwissProt52, TrEMBL53 using an e-value cut-off of 1e-5, and motifs and domains for the gene set were determined using InterProScan54. Using CEGMA package, the completeness of the gene space for the draft genome assembly was evaluated with the highly conserved 248 core eukaryotic gene (CEGs).
For noncoding RNAs, tRNAs were identified using tRNAscan-SE55, snRNAs and miRNAs, and rRNAs were obtained by searching the genome assembly against the Rfam database using InFERNAL with default parameters (http://infernal.janelia.org/). All the raw short reads, genome assembly were deposited in NBCI’s Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database with accession number PRJNA312694, and the gene annotation used for the analyses were provided to the Banana Genome Hub (banana-genome-hub.southgreen.fr/organism/Musa_itinerans).
Genome-wide duplications and estimation of the insertion times for LTR retrotransposons
Using the web-based tool SynMap on the plant comparative genome platform CoGe (https://genomevolution.org/CoGe/)56, the syntenic regions between M. itinerans and M. acuminata were generated, and scaffolds or contigs of M. itinerans were mapped or oriented on the 11 pseudo-chromosomes of M. acuminata. Reciprocal BLASTP between protein sequences of two Musa species with E-value cut-off of 1e-5, were implemented to identify orthologs between species, and self BLASTP for both species were used to obtain paralogs within species. After removing the self-matches of the BLASTP results, the syntenic blocks (≥5 genes per block) were determined with the package MCScanX25. The remaining aligned results were used to generate dot plots. Paralogous gene pairs in each block within species were used to infer genome duplication events. Meanwhile, orthologous gene pairs in each block between species provided some insights into the speciation events. The four-fold transversion (4DTv) ratio for each gene pair in the block was calculated on concatenated nucleotide alignments with HKY substitution models, and the distributions of these 4DTv values were used to estimate the whole genome duplication events and speciation events.
The 5′- and 3′-LTR sequences of the full-length LTR retrotransposons were aligned, and the K value (the average number of substitutions per aligned site) were calculated in the package MEGA57. The insertion times were estimated using this formula: T = K/(2 × r), where r represents the average substitution rate and is estimated to be 1.30 × 10−8 substitutions per site per year in rice39.
Phylogenetic analysis
The protein sequences of eight plant species including Arabidopsis thaliana, Vitis vinifera, Oryza sativa, Sorghum bicolor, Phoenix dactylifera, Elaeis guineensis, M. acuminata, and M. balbisiana were downloaded (sources details in Supplementary Note 5). After filtering out protein sequences with amino acid length of less than 50, the longest protein sequence was chosen among spliced variants. All the eight protein datasets together with those of M. itinerans were clustered into paralogous and orthologous groups using the program OrthoMCL v1.4 with the inflation parameter of 1.558. Protein sequences of each single-copy gene obtained from the nine species were aligned using MUSCLE v3.8.3159, and corresponding nucleotide sequences alignment of different genes were concatenated into one supergene. Using 4DTv sites of the supergene with the nucleotide substitution model HKY85 + gamma, a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the nine species was constructed using the package PhyML with NNI (Nearest Neighbor Interchange) tree improvement60. Bootstrap supports of the internal branches were evaluated by 1000 full-heuristic searches. Divergence time estimations between species were determined using MCMCtree in PAML 4.761, and the “correlated molecular clock” and “REV” substitution model were used in the approximate likelihood calculation. The MCMC process was run for 2,000,000 steps and sampled every 20,000 steps. A calibrated divergence time of 124~248.4 Ma between Arabidopsis and Sorghum was used23. Gene family expansions and contractions of extant species and ancient lineages were estimated using CAFE v2.162. Using a random birth and death model, the gene birth (λ) and death (μ = −λ) rates were estimated across the species tree composed of M. itinerans and eight other species, using the maximum likelihood method, and gene families with accelerated rate of expansion and contraction were determined with a threshold conditional P-value (P < 0.05).
Gene family evolution
Using HMMER V3 (http://hmmer.janelia.org/software), protein sequences of M. acuminata, M. itinerans, and M. balbisiana were aligned against the raw hidden Markov model (HMM) corresponding to the Pfam NBS (NB-ARC) family (PF00931, downloaded from website http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/). Following the method described in D’ Hont et al.8, the hit NBS-domain sequences were aligned and used to construct a new NBS HMM profile using the module ‘hmmbuild’ . Using this Musa specific model, we identified NBS- candidate proteins in the three Musa species respectively. TIR and LRR domains of these NBS-encoding amino acid sequences were identified with Pfam_scan. Coiled-Coil (CC) motif was identified using MARCOIL63 with a threshold probability of 90 and double-checked using paircoil64. Duplication modes of these NBS-encoding genes were identified in MCScanX25.
Transcription factors’ gene families (TFs) of the M. itinerans were identified by two complementary approaches. First, protein sequences of M. itinerans were BLASTP against the TFs of five other species including Musa acuminata, Arabidopsis thaliana, Vitis vinifera, Oryza sativa, Phoenix dactylifera (http://planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn/). Second, de novo predicted TFs were obtained using all the TFs of the other five species to TBLASTN against the genome of M. itinerans and corresponding gene models were predicted using Genewise47. Using GLEAN50, non-overlapping TFs of M. itinerans were obtained. The duplication history of the MYB gene family was inferred using the programme MCScanX25.
Demographic history inference
One individual from each of the three populations was sequenced in high depth (Supplementary Note 1), and qualified reads from the short insert size library (500 bp or 180 bp) were realigned to the assembly with BWA with default parameters65. Consensus sequences were called using samtools66, and converted into the Fastq format using bcftools and vcfutils in the package pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent model38 (PMSC). The consensus sequences were split into non-overlapping 100 bp bins marked as homozygous or heterozygous and these split sequences were used to reconstruct the demographic history with the PSMC model with the following parameters: “N30 -t15 -r3 -b -p “4 + 5 * 3 + 4”. The variance of the simulation results was assessed with 100 bootstrap replicates. Finally, the PSMC profiles were scaled using generation time (g) of one year, and neutral mutation rate μ of 1.30 × 10−8 substitution per site per year.
Additional Information
Accession codes: The whole Genome assembly sequences and raw reads have been deposited in GenBank DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the BioProject ID PRJNA312694, with accession numbers SRR3180710, SRR3180652, SRR3180729, SRR3180738, and SRR3180744 for raw reads, and LVTN00000000 for genome assembly, and the version described in this paper is version LVTN01000000. The genome assembly and annotation files for Musa itinerans can also be accessed by The Banana Genome Hub (banana-genome-hub.southgreen.fr/organism/Musa_itinerans).
How to cite this article: Wu, W. et al. Whole genome sequencing of a banana wild relative Musa itinerans provides insights into lineage-specific diversification of the Musa genus. Sci. Rep. 6, 31586; doi: 10.1038/srep31586 (2016).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Jian-Bo Jian, Dr. Chi Zhang, Dr. Shan-Ceng Zhao, and Dr. Xiao-Dong Fang for their helpful suggestions on data analysis. The authors appreciate Dr Vincent Johnson at CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas in Bioversity-France, who has polished the manuscripts. Thanks are also given the people in BGI who are not in the author list but performed the genome sequencing experiments as business service. The study was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31261140366).
Footnotes
Author Contributions W.W. and Y.-L.Y. contributed equally to this project. X.-J.G. designed and managed the project. W.W., X.-J.G., M.R. and N.R. wrote the manuscript. X.-J.G. and W.-M.L. collected plant material. W.-M.H. and Y.-L.Y. processed the RAW data. Y.-L.Y. assembled and annotated the genome. W.W., W.-M.H., Y.-L.Y., M.R., W.-M.L. and X.M. conducted genome evolution analysis including gene family, phylogenetic analysis, and demographic history inference. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
- Hajjar R. & Hodgkin T. The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 156, 1–13 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- Heslop-Harrison J. S. & Schwarzacher T. Domestication, genomics and the future for banana. Ann. Bot. 100, 1073–1084 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ford-Lloyd B. V. et al. Crop Wild Relatives—Undervalued, Underutilized and under Threat? Bioscience 61, 559–565 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- Vaughan D. A., Balazs E. & Heslop-Harrison J. S. From Crop Domestication to Super-domestication. Ann. Bot. 100, 893–901 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brozynska M., Furtado A. & Henry R. J. Genomics of crop wild relatives: expanding the gene pool for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 1070–1085 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denham T. P. et al. Origins of agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of New Guinea. Science 301, 189–193 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perrier X. et al. Multidisciplinary perspectives on banana (Musa spp.) domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11311–11318 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D’Hont A. et al. The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. Nature 488, 213–217 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davey M. W. et al. A draft Musa balbisiana genome sequence for molecular genetics in polyploid, inter- and intra-specific Musa hybrids. BMC Genomics 14, 683 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Q.-J. et al. Rapid diversification of five Oryza AA genomes associated with rice adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, E4954–E4962 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L. F., Häkkinen M., Yuan Y. M., Hao G. & Ge X. J. Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the banana family (Musaceae) inferred from multiple nuclear and chloroplast DNA fragments, with a special reference to the genus Musa. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 57, 1–10 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Häkkinen M., Wang H. & Ge Xue-jun. Musa itinerans(Musaceae) and its intraspecific taxa in China. Nord. J. Bot. 26, 317–324 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- Li W. M. et al. Resistance sources to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 in banana wild relatives. Plant Pathol. 64, 1061–1067 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- Luo R. et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1, 18 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parra G., Bradnam K. & Korf I. CEGMA: A pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23, 1061–1067 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jurka J. et al. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 462–467 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xue S. & Barna M. Specialized ribosomes: a new frontier in gene regulation and organismal biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 355–369 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan J. a., Shirasu K. & Deng X. W. The diverse roles of ubiquitin and the 26S proteasome in the life of plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 948–958 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parniske M. Intracellular accommodation of microbes by plants: A common developmental program for symbiosis and disease? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3, 320–328 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson N. A. & Chapple C. Perturbing Lignin Biosynthesis: Metabolic Changes in Response to Manipulation of the Phenylpropanoid Pathway. Recent Adv. Polyphen. Res. 39–59 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- Kang J. et al. Plant ABC Transporters. Arabidopsis Book 9, e0153 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vinocur B. & Altman A. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: Achievements and limitations. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 123–132 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clarke J. T., Warnock R. C. M. & Donoghue P. C. J. Establishing a time-scale for plant evolution. New Phytol. 192, 266–301 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glémin S., Clément Y., David J. & Ressayre A. GC content evolution in coding regions of angiosperm genomes: A unifying hypothesis. Trends Genet. 30, 263–270 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y. et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 1–11 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van de Peer Y., Fawcett J. A., Proost S., Sterck L. & Vandepoele K. The flowering world: a tale of duplications. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 680–688 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peraza-Echeverria S., Dale J. L., Harding R. M., Smith M. K. & Collet C. Characterization of disease resistance gene candidates of the nucleotide binding site (NBS) type from banana and correlation of a transcriptional polymorphism with resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Ceubense race 4. Mol. Breed 22, 565–579 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Tan X. & Paterson A. H. Different patterns of gene structure divergence following gene duplication in Arabidopsis. BMC Genomics 14, 652 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeling M. et al. Many or most genes in Arabidopsis transposed after the origin of the order Brassicales. Genome Res. 18, 1924–1937 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holub E. B. The arms race is ancient history in Arabidopsis, the wildflower. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 516–527 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergelson J., Kreitman M., Stahl E. a. & Tian D. Evolutionary dynamics of plant R-genes. Science (80-). 292, 2281–2285 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhong Y., Li Y., Huang K. & Cheng Z.-M. Species-specific duplications of NBS-encoding genes in Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima). Sci. Rep. 5, 16638 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mace E. et al. The plasticity of NBS resistance genes in sorghum is driven by multiple evolutionary processes. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 253 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Couch B. C., Spangler R., Ramos C. & May G. Pervasive purifying selection characterizes the evolution of I2 homologs. Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact. 19, 288–303 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubos C. et al. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 573–581 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katiyar A. et al. Genome-wide classification and expression analysis of MYB transcription factor families in rice and Arabidopsis. BMC Genomics 13, 544 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birchler J. A., Riddle N. C., Auger D. L. & Veitia R. A. Dosage balance in gene regulation: Biological implications. Trends Genet. 21, 219–226 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H. & Durbin R. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature 475, 493–496 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma J. & Bennetzen J. L. Rapid recent growth and divergence of rice nuclear genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12404–12410 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antonovics J., McKane A. J. & Newman T. J. Spatiotemporal dynamics in marginal populations. Am. Nat. 167, 16–27 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mandák B., Bímová K., Plačková I., Mahelka V. & Chrtek J. Loss of genetic variation in geographically marginal populations of Atriplex tatarica (Chenopodiaceae). Ann. Bot. 96, 901–912 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J. & Whitlock M. C. Estimating Effective Population Size and Migration Rates From Genetic Samples Over Space and Time. Genetics 163, 429–446 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao H., Wang L. & Yuan J. Origin and time of Qiongzhou Strait. Mar. Geol. Quat. Geol. 27, 33–39 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573–580 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Droc G. et al. The banana genome hub. Database 2013 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gertz E. M., Yu Y.-K., Agarwala R., Schäffer A. a. & Altschul S. F. Composition-based statistics and translated nucleotide searches: improving the TBLASTN module of BLAST. BMC Biol. 4, 41 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birney E. & Durbin R. Using GeneWise in the Drosophila annotation experiment. Genome Res. 10, 547–548 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stanke M. et al. AUGUSTUS: A b initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salamov A. A. & Solovyev V. V. Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA. Genome Res. 10, 516–522 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elsik C. G. et al. Creating a honey bee consensus gene set. Genome Biol. 8, R13 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanehisa M. & Goto S. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bairoch A. & Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 45–48 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boeckmann B. et al. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 365–370 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zdobnov E. M. & Apweiler R. InterProScan--an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics 17, 847–848 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowe T. M. & Eddy S. R. tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955–964 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyons E. & Freeling M. How to usefully compare homologous plant genes and chromosomes as DNA sequences. Plant J. 53, 661–673 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M. & Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1596–1599 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L., Stoeckert C. J. & Roos D. S. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13, 2178–2189 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar R. C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guindon S., Dufayard J.-F., Lefort V. & Anisimova M. New Alogrithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum- Likelihoods Phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Z. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13, 555–556 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Bie T., Cristianini N., Demuth J. P. & Hahn M. W. CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution. Bioinformatics 22, 1269–1271 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delorenzi M. & Speed T. An HMM model for coiled-coil domains and a comparison with PSSM-based predictions. Bioinformatics 18, 617–625 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonnell A. V., Jiang T., Keating A. E. & Berger B. Paircoil2: Improved prediction of coiled coils from sequence. Bioinformatics 22, 356–358 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H. & Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.