Erratum
It has been brought to our attention that the last statement in the Results section of the Abstract of this article [1] is incorrect. This currently reads as: “Multivariate regression analysis, revealed that year of publication (t32 = 5.17, p = 0.000, 95 % CI: 0.76, 1.76), and sample size (t32 = 3.01, p = 0.005, 95 % CI: 1.36, 7.02), were the only two factors associated with reporting quality”. The error is the test statistic for the year of publication. It should be: “Multivariate regression analysis, revealed that year of publication (t32 = 1.26, p = 0.000, 95 % CI: 0.76, 1.76), and sample size (t32 = 3.01, p = 0.005, 95 % CI: 1.36, 7.02), were the only two factors associated with reporting quality”.
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12998-016-0099-6.
Reference
- 1.Karpouzis F, Bonello R, Pribicevic M, Kalamir A, Brown BT. Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;16(24). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]