ABSTRACT
Indoor fungi cause damage in houses and are a potential threat to human health. Indoor fungal growth requires water, for which the terms water activity (aw) and relative humidity (RH) are used. The ability of the fungi Aspergillus niger, Cladosporium halotolerans, and Penicillium rubens at different developmental stages to survive changes in aw dynamics was studied. Fungi grown on media with high aw were transferred to a controlled environment with low RH and incubated for 1 week. Growth of all developmental stages was halted during incubation at RHs below 75%, while growth continued at 84% RH. Swollen conidia, germlings, and microcolonies of A. niger and P. rubens could not reinitiate growth when retransferred from an RH below 75% to a medium with high aw. All developmental stages of C. halotolerans showed growth after retransfer from 75% RH. Dormant conidia survived retransfer to medium with high aw in all cases. In addition, retransfer from 84% RH to medium with high aw resulted in burst hyphal tips for Aspergillus and Penicillium. Cell damage of hyphae of these fungi after incubation at 75% RH was already visible after 2 h, as observed by staining with the fluorescent dye TOTO-1. Thus, C. halotolerans is more resistant to aw dynamics than A. niger and P. rubens, despite its limited growth compared to that of these fungi at a lowered steady-state aw. The survival strategy of this phylloplane fungus in response to the dynamics of aw is discussed in relation to its morphology as studied by cryo-scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM).
IMPORTANCE Indoor fungi cause structural and cosmetic damage in houses and are a potential threat to human health. Growth depends on water, which is available only at certain periods of the day (e.g., during cooking or showering). Knowing why fungi can or cannot survive indoors is important for finding novel ways of prevention. Until now, the ability of fungi to grow on media with little available water at steady state (unchanging conditions) has been important for evaluating whether a fungus can grow indoors. In the present study, we found that the fungus Cladosporium halotolerans, a common indoor fungus, is more resistant to changes in available water than the fungi Aspergillus niger and Penicillium rubens, despite the fact that the latter fungi can grow on media with low water availability. We concluded that the ability of fungi to deal with changes in humidity is at least as important as the ability to grow on low-water media.
INTRODUCTION
People in Europe spend only 1.6 h a day outdoors (1), emphasizing the need for a healthy indoor environment (2). Indoor fungal growth represents a global problem. It has been estimated that about 25% of social housing in the European Union shows fungal growth. This not only causes disfigurement of the building materials but also poses a health threat (3, 4). Asthmatic and allergic patients are particularly at risk due to activation of the immune system by airborne fungal structures that are released from surface-grown fungal colonies (5–9). Mycotoxins produced by indoor fungi may also contribute to the health risk, but it is still unknown to what extent these toxic compounds are produced and released into the indoor environment (10, 11).
Highly diverse fungal species are present in the outdoor air, in particular species of Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Cladosporium (12). Their abundance in temperate climates is influenced by the seasons. For instance, Cladosporium is particularly prevalent during fall (13, 14). The abundance of fungal species in the indoor environment is affected by their predominance in the outdoor environment and by the indoor conditions (13–17). Penicillium chrysogenum and Aspergillus versicolor are particularly abundant after water damage or direct moistening, while Cladosporium occurs predominantly in indoor environments without water-related incidents (12, 18–22).
A lot of studies have been done on fungal growth in relation to water activity (aw) (23–25) and relative humidity (RH) (26, 27). Both aw and RH express water's chemical potential, and therefore the availability of water. In this study, we use both terms, with the following relationship in equilibrium: RH = aw × 100%.
Earlier studies which were done in an attempt to predict indoor fungal growth focused on the effects of RH and fungal growth on building materials, such as gypsum (28–31), wood (32–35), and concrete (36). Most fungi show growth in the range of 90 to 100% RH (12), but a restricted subset of fungi, such as Cladosporium sphaerospermum, P. chrysogenum, and A. versicolor, also grow on building materials, such as plywood, pine sapwood, and gypsum board, at a static RH as low as 75 to 80% (33). However, dynamic humidity of around 80% RH resulted in less-than-expected growth in the case of some materials, such as gypsum board (33, 37). This value of 80% RH is stated as the lower limit for indoor fungal growth. Indoor RH is dynamically averaged to be around 50%, thus raising the question of how fungal cells respond to periods of lower RH (38). Survival of fully developed colonies of Penicillium rubens in response to aw dynamics was reported by Bekker (29). The effect of dynamic RH on the fungi Penicillium brevicompactum, Alternaria tenuissima, and Trichoderma harzianum in wood samples was studied by Li and Wadsö (35). They measured more heat release due to increased metabolic activity of fungal cells following an increase of RH by using an isothermal calorimeter. The impact of dynamic water availability on fungal growth was also studied in a model system of moistened building material that was dried and moistened again (22). The fungal growth seen in that study was due to the moisture content in the building material. The relevance of moisture content was shown in a study done by van Laarhoven et al. (31). Gypsum tablets equilibrated at a certain RH or soaked in a glycerol solution with the corresponding aw were inoculated with P. rubens. The soaked tablets that had a higher moisture content showed markedly faster elongation of hyphae. However, there is a scarcity of knowledge on the effects of humidity changes on the cellular level.
The purpose of this study was to compare the responses of indoor fungi, namely, Aspergillus niger, Cladosporium halotolerans, and P. rubens, at different developmental stages to steady-state and dynamic water activity. C. halotolerans had markedly better survival at both increasing and decreasing aw than that of P. rubens and A. niger. This difference in survival at dynamic aw was despite the growth limit of C. halotolerans at a higher steady-state aw than that for P. rubens and A. niger.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Organisms and growth conditions.
A. niger N402 (39), C. halotolerans CBS 139586 (40), and P. rubens CBS 401.92 (28) were used in this study. The P. rubens strain was first identified as Penicillium chrysogenum but was later reclassified (41). Strains were routinely grown at 25°C on dichloran-18% glycerol agar (DG18 agar; Oxoid) (aw = 0.96) (42, 43).
Growth at steady-state aw.
Measurements of the growth of fungi at lower steady-state aw were done as described by Segers et al. (40). Fungi were grown on malt extract agar (MEA) complemented with 0 to 50% glycerol (aw of 0.99 to 0.75) to assess the lower limits of growth with respect to aw. The aw values for the glycerol-agar mixtures were determined before and after growth experiments by using a Novasina labmaster-aw instrument (Novasina, Lachen, Switzerland) as also described by Segers et al. (40). Cultures were inoculated with 3 μl of a spore solution containing 1 × 106 conidia ml−1. These conidia were harvested from a 7-day-old culture by use of a T spatula (VWR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), using ice-cold sterile 10 mM N-(2-acetamido)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid, 0.02% Tween 80 (ACES; pH 6.8). The colony diameter was measured 3 times a week for 3 weeks. The growth speed was determined from the regression coefficients based on graphs of each colony.
Survival during periods of dynamic aw.
To study survival of fungal cells during changes in aw, DG18 plates were inoculated with 50 μl of spore solution (1 × 106 conidia ml−1). The inoculum was homogeneously spread on the agar surface by use of a T spatula and left to dry. A polycarbonate (PC) filter (47-mm diameter, 0.1-μm pore size; GE Water & Process Technologies) was placed on the surface of the inoculated agar to pick up the spores. Filters were immediately transferred to a new DG18 plate, with the side containing the spores oriented upwards. This “stamping” method resulted in 100 to 500 dispersed conidia per filter. The filters containing conidia were incubated in the dark on DG18 agar for 0 to 50 h, until the developmental stage of interest (Table 1; Fig. 1), as confirmed by light microscopy. Filters were removed from the agar plate and transferred to glass desiccators (6 liters) containing 150 to 300 ml saturated potassium chloride (RH, 84.3% ± 0.2%), sodium chloride (RH, 75.3% ± 0.1%), sodium bromide (RH, 57.6% ± 0.4%), or magnesium chloride (RH, 32.8% ± 0.2%) to control relative humidity (44). The filters were transferred to and from the desiccators within a humid environment (RH of >85%) to prevent exposure to low RH during transfer. The RH was quantified using a Testo 174H hygrometer (Testo, Lenzkirch, Germany). After 1 week of incubation within the desiccator, filters were transferred to DG18 agar plates, and incubation was prolonged at an aw of 0.96 for up to 1 month. Survival of fungal developmental structures, growth, and bursting of hyphal tips were evaluated and documented using a stereomicroscope (Zoom AZ-100; Nikon, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) within 30 min after transfer and after 1 and 2 days of incubation. The fungi were considered to have survived if hyphae reinitiated growth or the conidia germinated. These conidia could be originating from stage I and stage II or be newly formed at stage VI. A flowchart of this experimental setup is depicted in Fig. 2. Experiments were performed using at least two technical replicates and three biological replicates.
TABLE 1.
Developmental stages exposed to changes in aw
Developmental stage no. (description) | Species | Culture time (h)a |
---|---|---|
I (dormant conidia) | A. niger, C. halotolerans, and P. rubens | 0 |
II (swollen conidia) | A. niger, C. halotolerans, and P. rubens | 7–8 |
III (germlings) | A. niger and P. rubens | 18 |
C. halotolerans | 24 | |
IV (microcolonies without aerial hyphae) | A. niger and P. rubens | 24 |
C. halotolerans | 32–36 | |
V (microcolonies with aerial hyphae) | A. niger and P. rubens | 32–36 |
C. halotolerans | 44–48 | |
VI (sporulating microcolonies) | A. niger and P. rubens | 48–50 |
C. halotolerans | 48–60 |
Time needed to reach the indicated developmental stage on DG18 agar.
FIG 1.
Schematic overview of the developmental stages of the indoor fungi used in this study, i.e., dormant conidia (I), swollen conidia (II), germlings (III), and mycelia without aerial hyphae (IV), with aerial hyphae (V), and with conidium-forming conidiophores (VI).
FIG 2.
Flowchart of the experimental setup to study survival of indoor fungi after periods of lowered relative humidity.
Fluorescence microscopy.
A Zeiss Axioplan II microscope, a Zeiss Plan NeoFluar 40×/0.75 objective, and a blue BP450-490 (FT510, LP520) excitation filter were used for fluorescence microscopy. Images were captured with a Zeiss AxioCam MRc digital camera run by Zeiss Axiovision 4. A 0.1 mM solution of the fluorescent dye quinolinium, 1-1′-[1,3-propanediylbis[(dimethyliminio)-3,1-propanediyl]]bis[4-[(3-methyl-2(3H)-benzothiazolylidene)methyl]]-, tetraiodide (TOTO-1; Molecular Probes, Breda, The Netherlands) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as a stain of dead colonies. Colonies without aerial hyphae, grown on top of PC filters on DG18 agar (see above), were placed in a desiccator containing a saturated NaCl solution (75% RH) for 45 or 105 min. Filters were placed back on DG18 agar and stained for 25 min by using 2 μM TOTO-1 in ACES buffer (45, 46). A 1-cm2 square of the filter and the underlying DG18 agar was placed on top of an objective glass and covered with a coverslip. Colonies grown on a PC filter and killed with 70% alcohol or a 20-min steam treatment (47) served as a control.
Cryo-SEM.
Small rectangular 5- by 5-mm blocks of agar medium topped with a filter were transferred to copper cups for snap-freezing in nitrogen slush. They were glued to the copper surface with frozen tissue medium (KP-Cryoblock; Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands) and sputter coated 3 times for 1 min each by using a gold target. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM) was done with a JEOL 5600LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an Oxford CT1500 Cryostation. Electron micrographs were taken at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV.
RESULTS
Minimal and optimal water activities for fungal growth.
The minimal and optimal aw values for growth of A. niger, C. halotolerans, and P. rubens were determined. Colony diameters of A. niger, C. halotolerans, and P. rubens colonies were monitored 3 times a week during a 3-week period on MEA plates with aw values of 0.75 to 0.99 (Fig. 3). A. niger was the fastest-growing species, with an optimal growth speed of 14.4 mm day−1, while the optimal growth speed of P. rubens was 7.9 mm day−1. C. halotolerans has a growth speed of 4.1 mm day−1 as derived from the work of Segers et al. (40). These optimal growth speeds were observed at aw values of 0.96 to 0.98. The minimal aw values needed to support growth of A. niger, C. halotolerans, and P. rubens were 0.80, 0.82 (40), and 0.82, respectively.
FIG 3.
Growth (change in colony diameter) of A. niger (green triangles), C. halotolerans (gray squares) (data derived from the work of Segers et al. [40]), and P. rubens (blue diamonds) on MEA with 0 to 50% glycerol.
Survival during periods of dynamic aw.
A. niger, C. halotolerans, and P. rubens were tested for the ability to survive during periods of defined lowered aw, which were obtained using closed environments containing a saturated salt solution. Filters overlying DG18 agar medium were inoculated with freshly harvested conidia (stage I) and cultured at an aw of 0.96 until conidia were swollen (stage II), conidia formed germ tubes (stage III), or microcolonies formed without aerial hyphae (stage IV), with aerial hyphae (stage V), or with conidium-forming conidiophores (stage VI) (Table 1; Fig. 1). The filters with these developmental stages were removed from agar and transferred to 33%, 58%, 75%, and 84% RH. No growth was observed during incubation in the desiccator at RHs of 33 to 75%, while growth continued in the desiccator at RHs above 84% for all developmental stages of the 3 species.
After 1 week of incubation, survival was assessed by removing the filters from the desiccators and placing them on DG18 agar with an aw of 0.96. The response of the fungi was monitored for up to 1 month. Incubation for 2 weeks to up to 1 month resulted in no more survival as determined 2 days after removal from the desiccator. Developmental stages II to V did not reinitiate growth at an aw of 0.96 after a 1-week incubation at 33% RH. In contrast, about 50% of the conidia (stage I) of the 3 species germinated after transfer to medium with an aw of 0.96. Similarly, germination of newly formed conidia was observed in the case of conidium-producing colonies (stage VI). Similar results were obtained after incubation at 58% RH. However, in this case, more conidia from stages I and VI germinated than those after incubation at 33% RH. Notably, stage V colonies of C. halotolerans also showed some growth at an aw of 0.96 after exposure to 58% RH. All developmental stages of C. halotolerans incubated for 1 week at 75% RH showed survival after transfer of the filters to medium with an aw of 0.96. Incubation of A. niger and P. rubens at 75% RH gave results similar to those obtained after incubation at 33% and 58% RH, except that more conidia of stages I and VI germinated. Thus, A. niger and P. rubens hyphae were unable to reinitiate growth after incubation at 75% RH (Table 2). Figure 4 shows examples of C. halotolerans and P. rubens after 1 week at 75% or 84% RH. P. rubens (stage IV) did not survive for 1 week at 75% RH (Fig. 4A and B), but in contrast, C. halotolerans did (Fig. 4C and D). Both fungi continued to grow during the period of 1 week at 84% RH, and both formed conidiophores (Fig. 4E and G). They showed strongly increased growth after 1 day of being rehydrated on DG18 agar (Fig. 4F and H).
TABLE 2.
Survival of developmental stages of A. niger, C. halotolerans, and P. rubens after 1 week of incubation at 33, 58, 75, or 84% RH and subsequent 1 to 2 days of incubation on DG18 agar
RH (%) during 1 week of incubation | Developmental stagea | Survivalb |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
A. niger | C. halotolerans | P. rubens | ||
33 | I | ++ | ++ | ++ |
II | − | − | − | |
III | − | − | − | |
IV | − | − | − | |
V | − | − | − | |
VI | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
58 | I | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
II | − | − | − | |
III | − | − | − | |
IV | − | − | − | |
V | − | + | − | |
VI | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
75 | I | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
II | − | ++++ | − | |
III | − | ++++ | − | |
IV | − | ++++ | − | |
V | + | ++++ | − | |
VI | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | |
84 | I | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
II | ++++ | ++++ | +++ | |
III | +++ | ++++ | +++ | |
IV | +++ | ++++ | +++ | |
V | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | |
VI | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
The developmental stages comprised dormant conidia (I), swollen conidia (II), germlings (III), and microcolonies without aerial hyphae (IV), with aerial hyphae (V), and with conidium-forming conidiophores (VI).
Survival was qualified as no survival (−), <5% survival (+), <50% survival (++), >50% survival (+++), and >95% survival (++++).
FIG 4.
Branching hyphae of P. rubens (stage IV) (A, B, E, and F) and C. halotolerans (C, D, G, and H) immediately after incubation for 1 week at 75% RH (A and C) or 84% RH (E and G) and after subsequent incubation on DG18 agar for 1 day (B, D, F, and H). Bar = 100 μm.
Staining with TOTO-1 showed that some and most hyphae of A. niger and P. rubens were killed after 45 min (Fig. 5G and I) and 105 min (Fig. 5J and L), respectively, of exposure to 75% RH. In contrast, C. halotolerans showed no or little fluorescence after these exposures (Fig. 5H and K), indicating that most hyphae survived the treatment.
FIG 5.
TOTO-1 staining, an indication of dead fungal structures, of A. niger (A, D, G, and J), C. halotolerans (B, E, H, and K), and P. rubens (C, F, I, and L) after treatment with steam for 20 min (A to C) or after exposure to 70% alcohol (D to F), to 75% RH for 45 min (G to I), or to 75% RH for 105 min (J to L). Bar = 20 μm.
As mentioned above, growth of the colonies of the 3 species continued, albeit at a lower rate, during incubation at 84% RH and subsequent transfer to DG18 agar. However, 14.7% and 7.5% of all hyphal tips of microcolonies, including small branching hyphae, burst directly after the transfer for A. niger and P. rubens, respectively (Fig. 6). In contrast, hyphal tips of C. halotolerans hardly (0.2%) showed rupture. Most bursting hyphae were found at the periphery of the colony (Fig. 6A), while hyphae at the center of the microcolony resumed growth, as indicated with arrows (Fig. 6B).
FIG 6.
(A and B) Leading hyphae of P. rubens growing at 84% RH had burst after transfer to DG18 agar (aw = 0.96). (B) New hyphae formed that originated from the center of the colony (white arrows) when the colony was left to grow for another 24 h after being transferred to DG18 agar. Bars = 100 μm (A) and 200 μm (B).
DISCUSSION
Relative humidity (RH) can change considerably during and between days in indoor situations. As a result, indoor fungi not only have to be able to survive periods of low RH but also have to be able to resume growth within the time frame of favorable RH. In this study, we compared the capacities of A. niger, C. halotolerans, and P. rubens to grow during static or dynamic water activity (aw) regimens.
A. niger grew at an aw of 0.80 at 25°C, which was lower than the minimal aw of 0.82 for C. halotolerans and P. rubens. The latter data confirm earlier findings (23, 40, 48, 49), although A. niger has been reported to grow even at an aw of 0.78. The latter value was obtained at the optimal growth temperature of 30°C (23).
A controlled decrease in aw was used to address the responses of A. niger, C. halotolerans, and P. rubens to dynamic aw conditions. To this end, conidia were inoculated onto filters overlying DG18 medium (aw = 0.96) and cultured until conidia had swollen or germinated or until microcolonies had formed without aerial hyphae, with aerial hyphae, or with conidium-forming conidiophores. The filters were then transferred to 84%, 75%, 58%, and 33% RH (aw = 0.84, 0.75, 0.58, and 0.33). Conidia germinated at 84% RH but not at lower RHs, as could be expected according to the data presented above. Yet some or even all spores that had been exposed to the lower-RH conditions germinated when they were retransferred to DG18 agar after 1 week. The percentage of conidia that germinated increased with increasing RHs used during the 1-week incubation. This is interesting because conidia of Aspergillus fumigatus that had been dried slowly at room temperature survived for a year, with full germination (50). In our study, some of the conidia of the different fungal species lost their viability after a relatively quick shift from 96% to 33% RH and a week-long incubation, which indicates that the speed of change in RH is an important factor in survival even for survival structures, such as conidia. Alternatively, the extent of drying may be a factor that improves survival of spores. Ascospores of Talaromyces macrosporus and Neosartorya fischeri survive better when stringently dried (down to 0% RH) than when dried in ambient air (which is typically 40 to 60% RH as measured with a hygrometer) (51). This can be explained by the large amounts of compatible solutes that result in a glassy state at water contents below 2 to 3%. The mobility of molecules is very low in this state, thus suppressing the incidence of detrimental chemical reactions (e.g., with reactive oxygen species) (52). Environmental conditions during conidium formation are also important for survival of asexual spores. In preliminary experiments, we used MEA instead of DG18 agar, and this indicated less survival after a 1-week incubation period at 75% RH for C. halotolerans. It may well be that colonies grown on DG18 agar had adapted to the lower aw of this medium and transferred this adaptation to the spores (53). It may also be that the glycerol in DG18 medium is taken up and serves as a compatible solute that helps the fungus and its conidia to survive during periods of low RH (24, 51).
This study showed that the capability to grow at low aw does not always reflect survival during changes in RH. All developmental stages of C. halotolerans were able to survive for 1 week at 75% RH. This was not the case for A. niger, despite its ability to grow at a lower steady-state aw. Notably, increasing water availability also affected survival. C. halotolerans hyphae had a much lower bursting incidence after transfer from 85% RH to medium with an aw of 0.96 than those of A. niger and P. rubens. This was probably due to the suddenly increased aw causing water influx into the hyphae. This may be due to differences in accumulation of compatible solutes between the species. Alternatively, the structure of the cell wall at the hyphal tips may differ. A more rigid cell wall at tips of C. halotolerans hyphae would more easily overcome a transfer from low to high water availability. At the same time, such a cell wall would restrict growth speed (54), which agrees with the lower growth speed of this species than those of A. niger and P. rubens. The rigidity of the C. halotolerans cell wall may be due to the presence of melanin. Nonlinear spectral imaging (NLSI) microscopy indicates that the cell wall of vegetative hyphae of C. halotolerans contains melanin, while melanin is absent in P. rubens (our unpublished results). Formation of enlarged cells with strengthened pigmented cell walls in the center of the colony (55), as well as formation of bundles of hyphae, may also help cells to overcome sudden changes in humidity (Fig. 7).
FIG 7.
Cryo-SEM images of C. halotolerans, showing a 1-day-old colony growing on DG18 agar on top of a 0.1-μm-pore-size polycarbonate filter. The microcolony (A) can be seen with strengthened cells in the center (B, D, and E), while bundles of hyphae stretch out as leading hyphae (B and C). Bars = 100 μm (A), 10 μm (B to D), and 5 μm (E).
The ability of C. halotolerans to cope with dynamic water availability is probably related to the ecological niche of this fungus. Cladosporium species grow on leaves and are therefore called phylloplane fungi (56, 57). The available water for fungi growing on leaves is highly dynamic and is influenced by changing temperature, dew formation, sunlight, and rain. It is interesting that the indoor environment is also characterized by changes in humidity during the day. It has been shown that phylloplane fungi can restore growth after minutes to hours of rehydration after drying for 2 to 3 weeks (56). Furthermore, these fungi have to withstand large amounts of UV radiation from direct sunlight. Damage from UV radiation is prevented by melanin within the cell walls of conidia and hyphae (58–60). The protection against UV radiation is of less concern in indoor environments, which are generally darker aside from the small amount of UV passing through open windows. However, melanin can help in protection against reactive oxygen species or other reactive molecules present in building materials.
This study shows for the first time, to our knowledge, that steady-state aw measurements, for so long the hallmark to determine the xerotolerance of a fungus, are not enough to predict the response of a fungus to humidity dynamics. The indoor environment is characterized by periods of lowered aw as well as sudden increases in water availability, and fungal cells have to deal with both types of change. It has to be expected that the adaptability of a fungal species to deal with humidity dynamics is important for the predominance of the species on the relevant building material. Fungi may even be able to influence the (micro)environment by using enzymes or other excretions. For example, germinating conidia of P. rubens are known to produce an extracellular matrix on gypsum (61).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation STW, which is part of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and is partly funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
We thank Joey van den Ende for technical assistance and Bart Theelen and Sylvia Klaubauf for critical readings of the manuscript. Elke van Nieuwenhuijzen is thanked for fruitful discussions.
REFERENCES
- 1.Schweizer C, Edwards RD, Bayer-Oglesby L, Gauderman WJ, Ilacqua V, Juhani Jantunen M, Lai HK, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Kunzli N. 2006. Indoor time-microenvironment-activity patterns in seven regions of Europe. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 17:170–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adan OCG, Ng-A-Tham J, Hanke W, Sigsgaard T, van den Hazel P, Wu F. 2007. In search of a common European approach to a healthy indoor environment. Environ Health Perspect 115:983–988. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bonnefoy X. 2007. Inadequate housing and health: an overview. Int J Environ Pollut 30:411–429. doi: 10.1504/IJEP.2007.014819. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bonnefoy XR, Braubach M, Moissonnier B, Monollbaev K, Robbel N. 2003. Housing and health in Europe: preliminary results of a pan-European study. Am J Public Health 93:1559–1563. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Denning DW, O'Driscoll BR, Hogaboam CM, Bowyer P, Niven RM. 2006. The link between fungi and severe asthma: a summary of the evidence. Eur Respir J 27:615–626. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00074705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reboux G, Bellanger AP, Roussel S, Grenouillet F, Millon L. 2010. Moulds in dwellings: health risks and involved species. Rev Fr D Allergol 50:611–620. doi: 10.1016/j.reval.2010.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miller JD, Sun M, Gilyan A, Roy J, Rand TG. 2010. Inflammation-associated gene transcription and expression in mouse lungs induced by low molecular weight compounds from fungi from the built environment. Chem Biol Interact 183:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rand TG, DiPenta J, Robbins C, Miller JD. 2011. Effects of low molecular weight fungal compounds on inflammatory gene transcription and expression in mouse alveolar macrophages. Chem Biol Interact 190:139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2011.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Green BJ, Schmechel D, Summerbell RC. 2011. Aerosolized fungal fragments, p 211–243. In Adan OCG, Samson RA (ed), Fundamentals of mold growth in indoor environments and strategies for healthy living, vol 1 Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Miller JD, McMullin DR. 2014. Fungal secondary metabolites as harmful indoor air contaminants: 10 years on. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:9953–9966. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6178-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Miller JD. 2011. Health effects from mold and dampness in housing in Western societies: early epidemiology studies and barriers to further progress, p 183–210. In Adan OCG, Samson RA (ed), Fundamentals of mold growth in indoor environments and strategies for healthy living, vol 1 Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nevalainen A, Taubel M, Hyvarinen A. 2015. Indoor fungi: companions and contaminants. Indoor Air 25:125–156. doi: 10.1111/ina.12182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.de Ana SG, Torres-Rodriguez JM, Ramirez EA, Garcia SM, Belmonte-Soler J. 2006. Seasonal distribution of Alternaria, Aspergillus, Cladosporium and Penicillium species isolated in homes of fungal allergic patients. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 16:357–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crawford JA, Rosenbaum PF, Anagnost SE, Hunt A, Abraham JL. 2015. Indicators of airborne fungal concentrations in urban homes: understanding the conditions that affect indoor fungal exposures. Sci Total Environ 517:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adams RI, Miletto M, Taylor JW, Bruns TD. 2013. Dispersal in microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show dispersal limitation at short distances. ISME J 7:1262–1273. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Horner WE, Worthan AG, Morey PR. 2004. Air- and dustborne mycoflora in houses free of water damage and fungal growth. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6394–6400. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6394-6400.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McGinnis MR. 2007. Indoor mould development and dispersal. Med Mycol 45:1–9. doi: 10.1080/13693780600928495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Andersen B, Frisvad JC, Sondergaard I, Rasmussen IS, Larsen LS. 2011. Associations between fungal species and water-damaged building materials. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4180–4188. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02513-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fradkin A, Tarlo SM, Tobin RS, Tucicporretta M, Malloch D. 1987. Species identification of airborne molds and its significance for the detection of indoor pollution. JAPCA 37:51–53. doi: 10.1080/08940630.1987.10466201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pasanen P, Korpi A, Kalliokoski P, Pasanen AL. 1997. Growth and volatile metabolite production of Aspergillus versicolor in house dust. Environ Int 23:425–432. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(97)00027-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Polizzi V, Delmulle B, Adams A, Moretti A, Susca A, Picco AM, Rosseel Y, Kindt R, Van Bocxlaer J, De Kimpe N, Van Peteghem C, De Saeger S. 2009. Jem spotlight: fungi, mycotoxins and microbial volatile organic compounds in mouldy interiors from water-damaged buildings. J Environ Monit 11:1849–1858. doi: 10.1039/b906856b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pasanen AL, Kasanen JP, Rautiala S, Ikaheimo M, Rantamaki J, Kaariainen H, Kalliokoski P. 2000. Fungal growth and survival in building materials under fluctuating moisture and temperature conditions. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 46:117–127. doi: 10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00093-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ayerst G. 1969. The effects of moisture and temperature on growth and spore germination in some fungi. J Stored Prod Res 5:127–141. doi: 10.1016/0022-474X(69)90055-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hallsworth JE, Magan N. 1995. Manipulation of intracellular glycerol and erythritol enhances germination of conidia at low water availability. Microbiology 141:1109–1115. doi: 10.1099/13500872-141-5-1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Magan N, Lacey J. 1984. Effect of temperature and pH on water relations of field and storage fungi. Trans Br Mycol Soc 82:71–81. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(84)80213-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Grant C, Hunter CA, Flannigan B, Bravery AF. 1989. The moisture requirements of molds isolated from domestic dwellings. Int Biodeterior 25:259–284. doi: 10.1016/0265-3036(89)90002-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nielsen KF, Holm G, Uttrup LP, Nielsen PA. 2004. Mould growth on building materials under low water activities. Influence of humidity and temperature on fungal growth and secondary metabolism. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 54:325–336. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Adan OCG. 1994. On the fungal defacement of interior finishes. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bekker M. 2014. Growth of Penicillium rubens after desiccation. Technical University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bekker M, Erich SJF, Hermanns SPM, van Maris MPFHL, Huinink HP, Adan OCG. 2015. Quantifying discoloration caused by the indoor fungus Penicillium rubens on building material at controlled humidity. Build Environ 90:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.van Laarhoven KA, Huinink HP, Segers FJJ, Dijksterhuis J, Adan OCG. 2015. Separate effects of moisture content and water activity on the hyphal extension of Penicillium rubens on porous media. Environ Microbiol 17:5089–5099. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Johansson P, Bok G, Ekstrand-Tobin A. 2013. The effect of cyclic moisture and temperature on mould growth on wood compared to steady state conditions. Build Environ 65:178–184. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Johansson P, Ekstrand-Tobin A, Svensson T, Bok G. 2012. Laboratory study to determine the critical moisture level for mould growth on building materials. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 73:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Viitanen HA. 1997. Modelling the time factor in the development of mould fungi—the effect of critical humidity and temperature conditions on pine and spruce sapwood. Int J Biol Chem Phys Technol Wood 51:6–14. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li Y, Wadsö L. 2013. Fungal activities of indoor moulds on wood as a function of relative humidity during desorption and adsorption processes. Eng Life Sci 13:528–535. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201200100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Viitanen H, Ojanen T. 2007. Improved model to predict mold growth in building materials. In Abstr Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings X, Clearwater Beach, FL, 2 to 7 December 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Johansson P, Svensson T, Ekstrand-Tobin A. 2013. Validation of critical moisture conditions for mould growth on building materials. Build Environ 62:201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Adan OCG, Samson RA. 2011. Introduction, p 15–36. In Adan OCG, Samson RA (ed), Fundamentals of mold growth in indoor environments and strategies for healthy living. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bos CJ, Debets AJM, Swart K, Huybers A, Kobus G, Slakhorst SM. 1988. Genetic-analysis and the construction of master strains for assignment of genes to 6 linkage groups in Aspergillus niger. Curr Genet 14:437–443. doi: 10.1007/BF00521266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Segers FJJ, Meijer M, Houbraken J, Samson RA, Wösten HAB, Dijksterhuis J. 2015. Xerotolerant Cladosporium sphaerospermum are predominant on indoor surfaces compared to other Cladosporium species. PLoS One 10:e0145415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Houbraken J, Frisvad JC, Samson RA. 2011. Fleming's penicillin producing strain is not Penicillium chrysogenum but P. rubens. IMA Fungus 2:87–95. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Beuchat LR, Hwang CA. 1996. Evaluation of modified dichloran 18% glycerol (DG18) agar for enumerating fungi in wheat flour: a collaborative study. Int J Food Microbiol 29:161–166. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(95)00042-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hocking AD, Pitt JI. 1980. Dichloran-glycerol medium for enumeration of xerophilic fungi from low-moisture foods. Appl Environ Microbiol 39:488–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Greenspan L. 1977. Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions. J Res Natl Bureau Stand 81:89–96. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Van Leeuwen MR, Golovina EA, Dijksterhuis J. 2009. The polyene antimycotics nystatin and filipin disrupt the plasma membrane, whereas natamycin inhibits endocytosis in germinating conidia of Penicillium discolor. J Appl Microbiol 106:1908–1918. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04165.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Van Leeuwen MR, Van Doorn TM, Golovina EA, Stark J, Dijksterhuis J. 2010. Water- and air-distributed conidia differ in sterol content and cytoplasmic microviscosity. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:366–369. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01632-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fritsche W, Laplace F. 1999. Mikrobiologie. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Samson RA, Houbraken J, Thrane U, Frisvad JC, Andersen B. 2010. Food and indoor fungi. CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sautour M, Dantigny P, Divies C, Bensoussan M. 2001. A temperature-type model for describing the relationship between fungal growth and water activity. Int J Food Microbiol 67:63–69. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00471-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lamarre C, Sokol S, Debeaupuis JP, Henry C, Lacroix C, Glaser P, Coppee JY, Francois JM, Latge JP. 2008. Transcriptomic analysis of the exit from dormancy of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia. BMC Genomics 9:417. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wyatt TT, van Leeuwen MR, Golovina EA, Hoekstra FA, Kuenstner EJ, Palumbo EA, Snyder NL, Visagie C, Verkennis A, Hallsworth JE, Wosten HAB, Dijksterhuis J. 2015. Functionality and prevalence of trehalose-based oligosaccharides as novel compatible solutes in ascospores of Neosartorya fischeri (Aspergillus fischeri) and other fungi. Environ Microbiol 17:395–411. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hoekstra FA, Golovina EA, Buitink J. 2001. Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 6:431–438. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02052-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dantigny P, Nanguy SPM. 2009. Significance of the physiological state of fungal spores. Int J Food Microbiol 134:16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wessels JG. 1993. Tansley review no. 45. Wall growth, protein excretion and morphogenesis in fungi. New Phytol 123:397–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dijksterhuis J. 2011. The fungal cell, p 83–100. In Adan OCG, Samson RA (ed), Fundamentals of mold growth in indoor environments and strategies for healthy living, vol 1 Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Park D. 1982. Phylloplane fungi: tolerance of hyphal tips to drying. Trans Br Mycol Soc 79:174–178. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(82)80212-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Moody SA, Newsham KK, Ayres PG, Paul ND. 1999. Variation in the responses of litter and phylloplane fungi to UV-B radiation (290–315 nm). Mycol Res 103:1469–1477. doi: 10.1017/S0953756299008783. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dadachova E, Bryan RA, Howell RC, Schweitzer AD, Aisen P, Nosanchuk JD, Casadevall A. 2008. The radioprotective properties of fungal melanin are a function of its chemical composition, stable radical presence and spatial arrangement. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 21:192–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2007.00430.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Feofilova EP. 2010. The fungal cell wall: modern concepts of its composition and biological function. Microbiology 79:711–720. doi: 10.1134/S0026261710060019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gostincar C, Grube M, de Hoog S, Zalar P, Gunde-Cimerman N. 2010. Extremotolerance in fungi: evolution on the edge. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:2–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bekker M, Huinink HP, Adan OCG, Samson RA, Wyatt T, Dijksterhuis J. 2012. Production of an extracellular matrix as an isotropic growth phase of Penicillium rubens on gypsum. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:6930–6937. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01506-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]