Abstract
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are prevalent slow-flow vascular lesions which harbour the risk to develop intracranial haemorrhages, focal neurological deficits, and epileptic seizures. Autosomal dominantly inherited CCMs were found to be associated with heterozygous inactivating mutations in 3 genes, CCM1 (KRIT1), CCM2 (MGC4607), and CCM3 (PDCD10) in 1999, 2003 and 2005, respectively. Despite the availability of high-throughput sequencing techniques, no further CCM gene has been published since. Here, we report on the identification of an autosomal dominantly inherited frameshift mutation in a gene of thus far unknown function, FAM222B (C17orf63), through exome sequencing of CCM patients mutation-negative for CCM1-3. A yeast 2-hybrid screen revealed interactions of FAM222B with the tubulin cytoskeleton and STAMBP which is known to be associated with microcephaly-capillary malformation syndrome. However, a phenotype similar to existing models was not found, neither in fam222bb/fam222ba double mutant zebrafish generated by transcription activator-like effector nucleases nor in an in vitro sprouting assay using human umbilical vein endothelial cells transfected with siRNA against FAM222B. These observations led to the assumption that aberrant FAM222B is not involved in the formation of CCMs.
Key Words: Angiogenesis, Animal models, Cerebrovascular disease, Cerebral cavernous malformations, Intracerebral haemorrhage
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are angiographically occult vascular malformations of the central nervous system. With the availability of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including gradient-echo (GRE/T2*) and susceptibility-weighted imaging sequences, their prevalence has been demonstrated to be about 1:650 among neurologically asymptomatic people [Morris et al., 2009]. Familial CCM (MIM 116860, 603284, 603285) has been assumed to occur in close to 20% of all cases and is associated with the development of multiple CCMs earlier in life [Fischer et al., 2013]. At-risk family members are threatened by the uncertainties of recurrent haemorrhages which may cause chronic headache, epilepsy, neurological deficits, and haemorrhagic stroke with intrafamilial variability [Fauth et al., 2015].
Disease penetrance has been reported to be 63, 55, and 68% for individuals carrying a heterozygous loss-of-function (LOF) mutation in CCM1, CCM2 or CCM3, respectively [Denier et al., 2006]. Fulminant disease courses with hemiparesis during the first years of life have only rarely been reported for CCM1 and CCM3 mutation carriers. However, one third of index patients were children or adolescents when referred for genetic testing [Spiegler et al., 2014]. The identification of a mutation within one of the known CCM genes in an index case enables predictive genetic testing of further at-risk family members. Most importantly, exclusion of a specific familial mutation relieves relatives and their families from unnecessary anxieties and medical examinations [Schröder et al., 2014].
If genetic screening of index cases follows stringent inclusion criteria, mutation detection rates are 87% for affected individuals with a positive family history and 57% for isolated cases carrying multiple CCMs, the overall proportions being 60% for CCM1, 18% for CCM2, and 22% for CCM3 mutations [Spiegler et al., 2014]. While some of the isolated mutation-negative cases may be explained by the occurrence of postzygotic somatic mutations, mutation negativity for the known CCM1-3 genes in familial cases alludes to further genetic heterogeneity. In this study, we analysed FAM222B as a putative candidate gene for CCMs and showed that it does not play a role in maintaining vascular integrity in vitro and in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Clinical Samples
After step-wise sequencing, MLPA and transcript analyses of CCM1-3 had been performed with informed consent according to the German Gene Diagnostics Act for all index cases fulfilling the established criteria [Stahl et al., 2008; Spiegler et al., 2014]. For the 4 isolated cases and the father-daughter duo (fig. 1A), multiple cavernomas have been verified by MRI. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes using standard protocols.
Whole Exome Sequencing
For exome capture, the SOLiD-optimized SureSelect Human All Exon 50Mb kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, Calif., USA) was used following the manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing on a SOLiD 5500XL platform (Life Technologies - Thermo Fisher, Waltham, Mass., USA) was performed in pools of 4 samples on 2 lanes of a sequencing slide. On average, mean target sequencing depth was 29 and 67% of the exome was covered at least 10 times. To verify the results and increase the depth of coverage, target enrichment and exome sequencing was repeated for all 4 isolated probands and the father-daughter duo (mean target sequencing depth was 78×). In brief, primary data analysis and variant annotation was done with the bioinformatics pipeline from Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) as described [Neveling et al., 2013]. Using an overlap strategy for index probands I, III-VI (fig. 1A) [Hoischen et al., 2010, 2011], we searched for heterozygous mutations that occur in a single gene in at least 2 patients and are expected to disrupt protein function (frameshift, stop, and splice mutations). For the father-daughter duo (probands I and II, fig. 1A), a linkage strategy based on the suspected autosomal dominant mode of inheritance was applied. For both approaches, exclusion of frequent variants in an in-house database consisting of 670 exomes as well as frequent variants in dbSNP132 (>1%), the exome variant server (EVS, >1%) and gonosomes was followed by manual validation of the remaining genes through evaluation of mapped reads, conservation scores, expression data, and known phenotypes in mice or zebrafish. Following validation of the FAM222B (ENSEMBL ENST00000581407, GenBank NM_018182) frameshift mutation, verification analyses were done in a cohort of 15 further CCM probands that presented with multiple cavernomas on MRI but without a causative mutation in CCM1-3. Sanger sequencing was performed on an ABI 3130xl automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems - Thermo Fisher) using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing v3.1 kit (Applied Biosystems - Thermo Fisher). FAM222B primer sequences are available on request.
Yeast 2-Hybrid Analysis
The screen was carried out by Hybrigenics Services SAS, Paris, France (http://www.hybrigenics-services.com). To screen a human fetal brain cDNA library, the cDNA coding for full-length human FAM222B (SC320887, Origene, Rockville, Md., USA) was cloned as a C-terminal fusion to the DNA-binding domain of LexA into the pB27 vector (N-LexA-FAM222B-C). Yeast cells were transfected and 90 million clones (9× coverage of the library complexity) were screened, providing a total of 197 positive clones on selective medium supplemented with 1 mM 3-aminotriazole. Positive clones were sequenced at 5′- and 3′-junctions and the identification of corresponding interacting proteins in the GenBank database was performed on a fully automated basis. Interactions were attributed by a confidence score as described [Formstecher et al., 2005].
In vivo Studies
Zebrafish were maintained in accordance with the approved institutional protocols at the Hubrecht Institute. For the generation of a fam222bb and fam222ba mutant zebrafish line, transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN)-mediated genome editing was performed as described elsewhere [van Impel et al., 2014]. TALEN sequences were identified in candidate genes using TAL Effector Nucleotide Targeter 2.0 (https://tale-nt.cac.cornell.edu/). TALEN binding sites in fam222bb exon 3 were: TAL1 5′-TACCCACCTCAGGTCA-3′, TAL2 5′-TCTTGGCCATAGTCAAA-3′. For Fam222ba the TALEN recognition sites were placed in exon 2: TAL1 5′-TGTTTCTACCTCAACCATTCC-3′, TAL2 5′-GGGCTCCATCAGGGCCGGCA-3′. Lines were outcrossed into a Tg(kdrl:GFP)s843/Tg(gata1:dsRed)sd2 background.
Image Acquisition
For all imaging experiments, larvae were treated with 0.2 mM 1-phenyl-2-thiocarbamide no later than 24 h after fertilization to prevent the formation of pigment in skin cells. Confocal imaging was performed on living embryos embedded in 0.8-1% low melting point agarose (Invitrogen - Thermo Fisher) with tricaine. Imaging of the vascular network was achieved using Leica SPE and SP7 microscopes. Images were visualized by ImageJ FIJI software (http://fiji.sc/Fiji) or Leica LAS AF software and processed with Adobe Photoshop CS5.1.
In vitro Studies
Primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were transfected with small interfering RNA (siRNA s226861, Ambion - Thermo Fisher) (final concentration: 10 nM) and 8 μl of oligofectamine (Invitrogen - Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer's protocol. OPTI-MEM was replaced after 4 h by ECGM (PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany) containing 10% FCS. Total RNA was extracted using PeqGold (Peqlab - VWR, Radnor, Pa., USA) reagent and purified using Absolutely RNA Miniprep Kit (Agilent Technologies). Reverse transcription was done with First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher) and knockdown was assessed using the QuantStudio 3D Digital PCR System (LifeTechnologies - Thermo Fisher) or the LightCycler480 instrument (Roche, Rotkreuz, Swiss) with a specific Universal Probe Library Assay for FAM222B (Roche, UPL #38, primer left: 5′-CCAGAACAGCTTGATGCAAA-3′, primer right: 5′-CATGGCCAGGCTCTGTTC-3′). For spheroid formation, the cells were harvested one day after transfection and cultured as hanging drops for another 24 h. After crop of the spheroids, they were embedded into a collagen matrix. Following polymerisation, they were stimulated with basal medium or a medium containing 25 ng/ml VEGF or FGF2 growth factors. After 24 h, sprouting was terminated by adding 10% paraformaldehyde to the wells.
Results
Identification of a Frameshift Mutation in FAM222B through Exome Analysis
To address the question of further genetic heterogeneity for CCMs, exome sequencing was performed for one familial (father and daughter) and 4 isolated cases (fig. 1A) that had remained mutation-negative for CCM1-3 [Stahl et al., 2008]. Of note, all probands reported early disease onset with a mean age at manifestation of 10.8 years (ranging from 9 months to 23 years). Clinical symptoms varied but tended to be severe with refractory epilepsy (individual I) and significant neurological deficits because of recurrent bleedings (individual II, IV-VI).
Whole exome sequencing of DNA from these patients led to ∼210,000 variants in total. Bioinformatic filtering following the overlap strategy [Gilissen et al., 2012] resulted in only 1 compelling candidate gene, FAM222B (C17orf63), harbouring a Sanger-validated 2-bp deletion, c.1651_1652delAG (p.Arg552Lysfs*10), which segregated with CCMs within the family (fig. 1A, individuals I and II), but was not observed in any of the other 4 isolated cases. The second exome analyses with higher coverage again revealed the known FAM222B frameshift mutation as the only compelling candidate.
Among the 6,503 controls from the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (EVS, Version v.0.0.14; http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), no LOF mutation was found in FAM222B which consists of 1 non-coding and 2 coding exons with the ATG initiator codon located in the second exon (fig. 2). Sanger sequencing of the entire coding region and adjacent splice sites of FAM222B was performed for 15 further CCM1-3 mutation-negative probands [Spiegler et al., 2014]. However, this did not reveal a second CCM individual carrying a FAM222B LOF or likely pathogenic missense mutation. Since the additional CCM individuals tested were mainly isolated cases with disease onset later in life (ranging from 12 to 59 years), the lacking genetic verification of FAM222B may not only be due to genetic heterogeneity, but also to phenocopies or somatic mosaicism [McDonald et al., 2014; Lodato et al., 2015].
Yeast 2-Hybrid Interactors of FAM222B Are Components of the Cytoskeleton and the RAS-MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathways
FAM222B encodes for a widely expressed 60 kDa protein of thus far unknown function (Multi-Omics Profiling Expression Database, PaxDb, The Human Protein Atlas). In silico analyses indicated the absence of a signal peptide, transmembrane domain or membrane anchor. In order to get a first idea on its putative roles, a human fetal brain cDNA library was screened using full-length human FAM222B as a bait in a LexA-based yeast 2-hybrid system. The most confident binding partners of FAM222B are listed in online supplementary table 1 (see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000446884, for all online suppl. material) and can be grouped into cytoskeletal components and proteins that are involved in different signalling cascades. In particular, the putative interactions of FAM222B with the tubulin cytoskeleton (TUBB, TUBB2A, TUBB2B, and TUBA1B) represented a possible link to subcellular localisation and function of known CCM proteins. Of note, CCM1 has been suggested to be a microtubule-associated protein [Gunel et al., 2002; Béraud-Dufour et al., 2007; Fisher and Boggon, 2014]. Another interactor of FAM222B, STAM-binding protein (STAMBP), has been described as a microtubule-associated protein involved in endosomal sorting of ubiquitinated proteins [Tsang et al., 2006; McDonell et al., 2013]. Mutations in STAMBP are associated with microcephaly-capillary malformation syndrome and also cause dysregulation of the RAS-MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways [McDonell et al., 2013]. This suggested that FAM222B may act in concert with the known CCM proteins in common networks.
Table 1.
Gene | Nonsense | Frameshift | Splice | Total | HGMD | Overlapping | EVS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCM1 | 6 | 7 (6) | 3 | 15 (14) | 6 | 2 (1× fs, 1× nonsense) | 2 |
CCM2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 (splice site) | 0 |
CCM3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FAM222B | 5 (2) | 8 (5) | 0 | 13 (7) | – | – | 0 |
The number of unique LOF mutations is given in brackets. The column HGMD indicates the number of mutations listed as disease causing in the HGMD database, another mutation at the same position is classified as overlapping (source: HGMD® Professional database 2015.4). The column EVS specifies the number of LOF mutations included in the Exome Variant Database (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/). None of them are listed in the HGMD database. fs = Frameshift.
TALEN-Generated fam222bb/fam222ba Double Mutants Display Normal Vascular Morphology
Large-scale forward genetic screens have identified a characteristic cardiovascular phenotype in zebrafish carrying mutations in either ccm1 (santa) or ccm2 (valentine) [Chen et al., 1996; Stainier et al., 1996; Mably et al., 2006; Hogan et al., 2008]. At 2-4 days after fertilisation, this phenotype mainly consists of dilated, slowly contracting heart chambers, disturbed blood circulation and pericardial edema, disorganised sprouting of subintestinal vessels, and an enlarged caudal vein which is spatially barely distinguishable from the caudal artery. All these features could later be reproduced by simultaneous knockdown of ccm3a and its duplicate ccm3b using antisense morpholino oligomers [Voss et al., 2009]. However, since these oligomers are known to often have off-target effects [Kok et al., 2015], we intended to analyse the effects of a fam222b knockout in mutant zebrafish embryos generated by TALENs (fig. 2). First, a founder fish bearing a 10-bp deletion was selected since this frameshift mutation in the fam222bb gene (fam222bbhu10539) is expected to result in protein truncation or nonsense-mediated decay. Then, the founder fish was crossed with Tg(kdrl:GFP)s843/Tg(gata1:dsRed)sd2 transgenic zebrafish in order to be able to visualise vascular morphology. Homozygous mutant, heterozygous and wild-type progeny was detected at the expected ratios, but no overt phenotype could be seen in embryos until 5 days after fertilisation.
In 2013, a new update of the zebrafish reference genome assembly (Zv9) revealed the existence of a fam222bb duplicate, fam222ba. Thus, a double mutant line was generated carrying a 10-bp deletion in the fam222ba gene (fam222bahu10755) in addition to the above-mentioned fam222bbhu10539 mutation. However, homozygous double mutants, 7 out of 59 analysed, were again indistinguishable from wild-type siblings 5 days after fertilisation (fig. 3). In addition, homozygous double mutants were viable to adulthood.
Normal Sprouting of HUVECs after siRNA-Mediated Knockdown of FAM222B
Silencing of either CCM1 or CCM3 had been shown to induce sprouting angiogenesis in vitro [Wüstehube et al., 2010; Schleider et al., 2011; You et al., 2013]. Therefore, a specific siRNA was used to knock down FAM222B (fig. 2) in HUVECs and to study the corresponding in vitro angiogenic phenotype in a 3D, spheroid-based sprouting assay as previously described [Korff and Augustin, 1998; Heiss et al., 2015]. Although FAM222B expression of siRNA-treated HUVECs was efficiently downregulated, no activation of angiogenic sprouting could be observed (fig. 4). Neither length nor number of sprouts were significantly altered in FAM222B knockdown spheroids upon stimulation with VEGF or FGF2. These observations were in line with the lack of a vascular phenotype in fam222bbhu10539/fam222bahu10755 double mutant zebrafish and strengthened the assumption that FAM222B is not involved in pathways keeping endothelial cells quiescent.
Discussion
The identification of inactivating mutations in CCM1, CCM2, and CCM3 in individuals affected with CCM led to the insight that the 3 gene products contribute to regulate angiogenesis and to maintain vascular homeostasis. Similarly, the association of a FAM222B frameshift mutation with early disease manifestation in an affected daughter and her father had raised the hope that this gene of thus far unknown function might be essential for vascular morphogenesis and integrity. However, despite the recent observation that deleterious mutations may activate compensatory networks in zebrafish [Rossi et al., 2015], our experimental studies using in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis model systems suggest that FAM222B is not required for vasculogenesis and angiogenesis.
During the course of our experiments, the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database was published, which comprises 60,706 exomes from individuals not affected by severe paediatric diseases. While no FAM222B LOF mutation was found in 6,503 controls from the EVS at the time the exome analyses had been performed, 13 heterozygous FAM222B LOF mutations were later found in the ExAC database. The 2-bp deletion c.1651_1652delAG which segregated with CCM in the familial case is listed 3 times in ExAC (Cambridge, Mass., Version 0.3/ 02/2016, http://exac.broadinstitute.org/) (table 1).
Therefore, we reviewed the ExAC database for LOF mutations in the known CCM1-3 genes (table 1): it is remarkable that 6 of the 15 LOF mutations within CCM1 and 1 of 3 LOF mutations within CCM2 have been described as disease causing in the HGMD database (HGMD® Professional database 2015.4; online suppl. table 2). This fact may be reconciled with the observation that disease penetrance is age-dependent and incomplete and disease manifestation variable for CCM. Notably, asymptomatic carrier parents harbouring at least one CCM have been observed in 75% of ‘apparently sporadic index cases with multiple lesions’ [Labauge et al., 1998], while bona fide de novo mutations have only rarely been documented for CCM1 [Stahl et al., 2008] and CCM3 [Bergametti et al., 2005]. In contrast to CCM1 and CCM2, not a single LOF mutation within CCM3 is mentioned in the ExAC database. This may be in line with the observation that 50-53% of index cases carrying a CCM3 mutation became symptomatic prior to age 15 - mostly with early-onset cerebral haemorrhages [Denier et al., 2006; Spiegler et al., 2014; Shenkar et al., 2015].
For the exome study presented here, we selected affected individuals with early and rather severe disease onset in order to search for a putative fourth causative gene in the remaining 13-43% of CCM1-3 mutation-negative probands. Thus, a bioinformatic filtering process considering the ExAC data may orientate towards the CCM2 and CCM3 data in ExAC and rather not allow more than 3 LOF mutations within the same gene and no recurrence for exactly the same mutation. On the one hand, our experimental data seem to support such strict filter criteria. On the other hand, CCM1 would have been excluded. Therefore, filter criteria need to be individually adapted even within one genetically heterogeneous condition [Albers et al., 2012], and a small number of occurrences in ExAC may not disqualify a candidate gene.
The advent of the ExAC database also prompted us to review disease prevalence of CCM1-3 LOF mutations. Based on the ExAC data, 1 in 3,373 individuals that do not display a severe paediatric disease harbour an inactivating heterozygous CCM1 or CCM2 germline mutation. Given that almost all CCM mutation carriers reveal at least one cavernous lesion if high-resolution MRI is performed [Denier et al., 2006], one can assume that the carriers of the 18 LOF CCM1-2 mutations listed in the ExAC database (table 1) bear asymptomatic CCMs that would have been detected in high-resolution MRI or autopsy study series. These had revealed that CCM occurs with a prevalence of about 0.5%/1:185-1:255 in hospital-based series [Del Curling et al., 1991; Robinson et al., 1991] and autopsies [Otten et al., 1989]. For neurologically asymptomatic people, the prevalence is lower and has been reported to be about 0.15%/1:676 [Morris et al., 2009] in a large meta-analysis. A recent prospective, population-based cohort study also pointed out that 24 of 139 (i.e., 17%) adults with CCMs had multiple lesions [Al-Shahi Salman et al., 2012]. In conclusion, the ExAC data most likely reflect the frequency of asymptomatic familial cases carrying CCM1 and CCM2 mutations and are in agreement with the previously published assumption that close to 20% of Caucasians that carry at least one CCM are in fact familial [Denier et al., 2006; Fischer et al., 2013].
Conclusion
Taken together, our experimental results as well as the ExAC data, FAM222B variants would currently not qualify to be used for predictive genetic testing of relatives. Even with high-throughput sequencing techniques, it remains challenging to identify unambiguously disease-causing mutations in a novel gene for a genetically heterogeneous condition with incomplete penetrance and variable clinical manifestations such as CCM. A further major obstacle is the likely occurrence of somatic mutations in a proportion of isolated CCM cases with multiple lesions but CCM1-3 mutation negativity in lymphocytes.
Statement of Ethics
Written informed consent for exome analyses was obtained from all study participants in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approval of the local ethics committee of the University Medicine Greifswald (registration No.: BB 067/13).
Disclosure Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the patients for their cooperation, C. Jensen and C. Sperling for excellent technical assistance, and C. Paperlein for verification analyses of mutation-negative patients. This work was supported by the Bavarian Genome Network (UF), EU project EnVision (FP7-REGPOT-2010-1, grant No. 264143, UF) and the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FE432/9-1, UF). A.F. is funded by the Helmholtz Society and the DFG (SFB-TR23). The authors would like to thank the Exome Aggregation Consortium and the groups that provided exome variant data for comparison. A full list of contributing groups can be found at http://exac.broadinstitute.org/about.
References
- 1.Albers CA, Paul DS, Schulze H, Freson K, Stephens JC, et al. Compound inheritance of a low-frequency regulatory SNP and a rare null mutation in exon-junction complex subunit RBM8A causes TAR syndrome. Nat Genet. 2012;44:435–439. doi: 10.1038/ng.1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Al-Shahi Salman R, Hall JM, Horne MA, Moultrie F, Josephson CB, et al. Untreated clinical course of cerebral cavernous malformations: a prospective, population-based cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:217–224. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70004-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Béraud-Dufour S, Gautier R, Albiges-Rizo C, Chardin P, Faurobert E. Krit1 interactions with microtubules and membranes are regulated by Rap1 and integrin cytoplasmic domain associated protein-1. FEBS J. 2007;274:5518–5532. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06068.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bergametti F, Denier C, Labauge P, Arnoult M, Boetto S, et al. Mutations within the programmed cell death 10 gene cause cerebral cavernous malformations. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:42–51. doi: 10.1086/426952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen JN, Haffter P, Odenthal J, Vogelsang E, Brand M, et al. Mutations affecting the cardiovascular system and other internal organs in zebrafish. Development. 1996;123:293–302. doi: 10.1242/dev.123.1.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Del Curling O, Jr, Kelly DL, Jr, Elster AD, Craven TE. An analysis of the natural history of cavernous angiomas. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:702–708. doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.75.5.0702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Denier C, Labauge P, Bergametti F, Marchelli F, Riant F, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations in cerebral cavernous malformations patients. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:550–556. doi: 10.1002/ana.20947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fauth C, Rostasy K, Rath M, Gizewski E, Lederer AG, et al. Highly variable intrafamilial manifestations of a CCM3 mutation ranging from acute childhood cerebral haemorrhage to late-onset meningiomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;128:41–43. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fischer A, Zalvide J, Faurobert E, Albiges-Rizo C, Tournier-Lasserve E. Cerebral cavernous malformations: from CCM genes to endothelial cell homeostasis. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19:302–308. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2013.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fisher OS, Boggon TJ. Signaling pathways and the cerebral cavernous malformations proteins: lessons from structural biology. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:1881–1892. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1532-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Formstecher E, Aresta S, Collura V, Hamburger A, Meil A, et al. Protein interaction mapping: a Drosophila case study. Genome Res. 2005;15:376–384. doi: 10.1101/gr.2659105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gilissen C, Hoischen A, Brunner HG, Veltman JA. Disease gene identification strategies for exome sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:490–497. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gunel M, Laurans MS, Shin D, DiLuna ML, Voorhees J, et al. KRIT1, a gene mutated in cerebral cavernous malformation, encodes a microtubule-associated protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:10677–10682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122354499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heiss M, Hellström M, Kalén M, May T, Weber H, et al. Endothelial cell spheroids as a versatile tool to study angiogenesis in vitro. FASEB J. 2015;29:3076–3084. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-267633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hogan BM, Bussmann J, Wolburg H, Schulte-Merker S. ccm1 cell autonomously regulates endothelial cellular morphogenesis and vascular tubulogenesis in zebrafish. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:2424–2432. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hoischen A, van Bon BW, Gilissen C, Arts P, van Lier B, et al. De novo mutations of SETBP1 cause Schinzel-Giedion syndrome. Nat Genet. 2010;42:483–485. doi: 10.1038/ng.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hoischen A, van Bon BW, Rodríguez-Santiago B, Gilissen C, Vissers LE, et al. De novo nonsense mutations in ASXL1 cause Bohring-Opitz syndrome. Nat Genet. 2011;43:729–731. doi: 10.1038/ng.868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kok FO, Shin M, Ni CW, Gupta A, Grosse AS, et al. Reverse genetic screening reveals poor correlation between morpholino-induced and mutant phenotypes in zebrafish. Dev Cell. 2015;32:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Korff T, Augustin HG. Integration of endothelial cells in multicellular spheroids prevents apoptosis and induces differentiation. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:1341–1352. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.5.1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Labauge P, Laberge S, Brunereau L, Levy C, Tournier-Lasserve E, et al. Hereditary cerebral cavernous angiomas: clinical and genetic features in 57 French families. Société Française de Neurochirurgie. Lancet. 1998;352:1892–1897. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lodato MA, Woodworth MB, Lee S, Evrony GD, Mehta BK, et al. Somatic mutation in single human neurons tracks developmental and transcriptional history. Science. 2015;350:94–98. doi: 10.1126/science.aab1785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mably JD, Chuang LP, Serluca FC, Mohideen MA, Chen JN, Fishmann MC. santa and valentine pattern concentric growth of cardiac myocardium in the zebrafish. Development. 2006;133:3139–3146. doi: 10.1242/dev.02469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McDonald DA, Shi C, Shenkar R, Gallione CJ, Akers AL, et al. Lesions from patients with sporadic cerebral cavernous malformations harbor somatic mutations in the CCM genes: evidence for a common biochemical pathway for CCM pathogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:4357–4370. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McDonell LM, Mirzaa GM, Alcantara D, Schwartzentruber J, Carter MT, et al. Mutations in STAMBP, encoding a deubiquitinating enzyme, cause microcephaly-capillary malformation syndrome. Nat Genet. 2013;45:556–562. doi: 10.1038/ng.2602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Morris Z, Whiteley WN, Longstreth WT, Jr, Weber F, Lee YC, et al. Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2009;339:b3016. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Neveling K, Martinez-Carrera LA, Hölker I, Heister A, Verrips A, et al. Mutations in BICD2, which encodes a golgin and important motor adaptor, cause congenital autosomal-dominant spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;92:946–954. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Otten P, Pizzolato GP, Rilliet B, Berney J. 131 cases of cavernous angioma (cavernomas) of the CNS, discovered by retrospective analysis of 24, 535 autopsies (in French) Neurochirurgie. 1989;35:82–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Robinson JR, Awad IA, Little JR. Natural history of the cavernous angioma. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:709–714. doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.75.5.0709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rossi A, Kontarakis Z, Gerri C, Nolte H, Hölper S, et al. Genetic compensation induced by deleterious mutations but not gene knockdowns. Nature. 2015;524:230–233. doi: 10.1038/nature14580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schleider E, Stahl S, Wüstehube J, Walter U, Fischer A, Felbor U. Evidence for anti-angiogenic and pro-survival functions of the cerebral cavernous malformation protein 3. Neurogenetics. 2011;12:83–86. doi: 10.1007/s10048-010-0261-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schröder W, Najm J, Spiegler S, Mair M, Viera J, et al. Predictive genetic testing of at-risk relatives requires analysis of all CCM genes after identification of an unclassified CCM1 variant in an individual affected with cerebral cavernous malformations. Neurosurg Rev. 2014;37:161–165. doi: 10.1007/s10143-013-0478-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shenkar R, Shi C, Rebeiz T, Stockton RA, McDonald DA, et al. Exceptional aggressiveness of cerebral cavernous malformation disease associated with PDCD10 mutations. Genet Med. 2015;17:188–196. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Spiegler S, Najm J, Liu J, Gkalympoudis S, Schröder W, et al. High mutation detection rates in cerebral cavernous malformation upon stringent inclusion criteria: one-third of probands are minors. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2014;2:176–185. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stahl S, Gaetzner S, Voss K, Brackertz B, Schleider E, et al. Novel CCM1, CCM2, and CCM3 mutations in patients with cerebral cavernous malformations: in-frame deletion in CCM2 prevents formation of a CCM1/CCM2/CCM3 protein complex. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:709–717. doi: 10.1002/humu.20712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stainier DY, Fouquet B, Chen JN, Warren KS, Weinstein BM, et al. Mutations affecting the formation and function of the cardiovascular system in the zebrafish embryo. Development. 1996;123:285–292. doi: 10.1242/dev.123.1.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tsang HT, Connell JW, Brown SE, Thompson A, Reid E, Sanderson CM. A systematic analysis of human CHMP protein interactions: additional MIT domain-containing proteins bind to multiple components of the human ESCRT III complex. Genomics. 2006;88:333–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.van Impel A, Zhao Z, Hermkens DM, Roukens MG, Fischer JC, et al. Divergence of zebrafish and mouse lymphatic cell fate specification pathways. Development. 2014;141:1228–1238. doi: 10.1242/dev.105031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Voss K, Stahl S, Hogan BM, Reinders J, Schleider E, et al. Functional analyses of human and zebrafish 18-amino acid in-frame deletion pave the way for domain mapping of the cerebral cavernous malformation 3 protein. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:1003–1011. doi: 10.1002/humu.20996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wüstehube J, Bartol A, Liebler SS, Brütsch R, Zhu Y, et al. Cerebral cavernous malformation protein CCM1 inhibits sprouting angiogenesis by activating DELTA-NOTCH signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:12640–12645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000132107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.You C, Sandalcioglu IE, Dammann P, Felbor U, Sure U, Zuh Y. Loss of CCM3 impairs DLL4-Notch signalling: implication in endothelial angiogenesis and in inherited cerebral cavernous malformations. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:407–418. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]