Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2016 Apr 12;20(9):1718–1728. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12867

Identification of HLA‐A*11:01‐restricted Mycobacterium tuberculosis CD8+ T cell epitopes

Su‐Dong Liu 1,, Jin Su 2,, Shi‐Meng Zhang 1, Hai‐Ping Dong 3, Hui Wang 1, Wei Luo 1, Qian Wen 1, Jian‐Chun He 1, Xiao‐Fan Yang 1, Li Ma 1,
PMCID: PMC4988290  PMID: 27072810

Abstract

New vaccines are needed to combat Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infections. The currently employed Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin vaccine is becoming ineffective, due in part to the emergence of multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB) strains and the reduced immune capacity in cases of HIV coinfection. CD8+ T cells play an important role in the protective immunity against MTB infections, and the identification of immunogenic CD8+ T cell epitopes specific for MTB is essential for the design of peptide‐based vaccines. To identify CD8+ T cell epitopes of MTB proteins, we screened a set of 94 MTB antigens for HLA class I A*11:01‐binding motifs. HLA‐A*11:01 is one of the most prevalent HLA molecules in Southeast Asians, and definition of T cell epitopes it can restrict would provide significant coverage for the Asian population. Peptides that bound with high affinity to purified HLA molecules were subsequently evaluated in functional assays to detect interferon‐γ release and CD8+ T cell proliferation in active pulmonary TB patients. We identified six novel epitopes, each derived from a unique MTB antigen, which were recognized by CD8+ T cells from active pulmonary TB patients. In addition, a significant level of epitope‐specific T cells could be detected ex vivo in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from active TB patients by an HLA‐A*11:01 dextramer carrying the peptide Rv3130c194‐204 (from the MTB triacylglycerol synthase Tgs1), which was the most frequently recognized epitope in our peptide library. In conclusion, this study identified six dominant CD8+ T cell epitopes that may be considered potential targets for subunit vaccines or diagnostic strategies against TB.

Keywords: MTB, CD8+ T cell epitope, class I restriction, ELISPOT, CFSE, Dextramer staining, active TB patient

Background

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infects one‐third of the world's population with a majority of the cases occuring in developing countries. Of those infected, 5–10% are likely to develop active tuberculosis (TB) during their lifetime 1, 2. The World Health Organization estimates that in 2014 alone, 9.6 million people developed TB and 1.5 million died from it. Meanwhile, the prevalence of multidrug‐resistant TB and HIV coinfection increases the difficulty of preventing and treating TB 3.

Host–pathogen interactions between mycobacteria and humans are complicated and have not been fully elucidated. However, strong evidence suggests that adaptive CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses represent an important mechanism for host recognition and contain of MTB 4. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II‐restricted CD4+ T cells play an essential role in protective immunity against MTB; this is supported by evidence that HIV‐positive patients, who have reduced circulating CD4+ pools, are more susceptible to MTB infection 5. CD4+ T cells activate macrophages by releasing lymphokines such as interferon (IFN)‐γ and tumour necrosis factor‐α 6. CD8+ T cells protect against MTB by lysing infected cells and killing intracellular bacterial by the release of the antimicrobial peptide granulysin 7. β2‐microglobulin (β2m)‐deficient mice, which are unable to develop MHC class I‐restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), rapidly succumb to MTB infection 8.

The only currently available vaccine against TB is the Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin (BCG) vaccine. The BCG vaccine is routinely administered to protect children against severe TB but fails to protect against pulmonary TB in adults and has safety issues in HIV‐positive or otherwise immunocompromised individuals 9, 10. Efforts have been made to identify immunogenic MTB antigens that could be used in a subunit vaccine to boost immune responses to MTB infection 11, 12, 13, 14. Identification of CD8+ T cell epitopes associated with protective responses would provide insight for the design of more effective vaccines against TB 15.

Epitopes recognized by the CD8+ T cell receptor are presented by HLA class I molecules expressed on the surface of antigen‐presenting cells, resulting in CD8+ T cell activation. Several MTB epitopes have been identified that are presented by HLA class I molecules to T cells leading to restricted infection. For instance, many epitopes derived from antigens like ESAT‐6, Ag85B and PPE68 were found to be immunogenic 16, 17, 18. However, these analyses were limited either to a few MHC alleles (primarily HLA‐A2) or a confined subset of candidate antigen proteins.

In this study, we sought to identify novel CD8+ T epitopes derived from MTB proteins that could be presented by the MHC class I molecule, HLA‐A*11:01. HLA‐A*11:01 is a predominant allele in Southeast Asia where MTB infections are common 19. Our hope is that the MHC class I‐restricted CD8+ T epitopes identified in this study contribute to the development of an effective subunit vaccine against MTB infection.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Southern Medical University. HIV‐negative patients diagnosed with TB were recruited from the Guangzhou Chest Hospital after obtaining written informed consent. Healthy individuals were recruited from Southern Medical University. HLA class I genes were genotyped using sequence‐based typing at the Beijing Genomic Institute.

Preparation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from fresh whole blood by density gradient centrifugation using Hypaque‐Ficoll (GE Healthcare Bio‐sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). The isolated PBMCs were resuspended in a mixture of 90% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and 10% DMSO (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and frozen in liquid nitrogen until use.

Bioinformatic analysis

Ninety‐four MTB proteins were chosen as sources for potential HLA‐A*11:01 restricted peptide epitopes as guided by previous studies. Among them, 45 proteins were selected from an analysis undertaken by Zvi et al. designed to identify TB vaccine candidates (Table 1, Part 1) 12. Sixteen proteins were reported to significantly reduce MTB loads in mouse vaccination experiments (Table 1, Part 2) 11. The remaining 33 MTB proteins were representative of antigens reported to elicit substantial CD8+ T cell responses (Table 1, Part 3) 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29. Amino acid sequences of 94 MTB proteins were obtained from GenBank. The sequences were scanned for HLA‐A*11:01‐restricted epitopes using the NetMHCcons prediction method (www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetMHCcons) 30. Epitopes were ranked according to their predicted binding affinity to HLA‐A*11:01, which was reported as a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) and ranked as high (IC50 ≤50 nM), intermediate (50 nM < IC50 ≤ 500 nM) or weak (IC50 >500 nM) binders 31. Forty‐eight peptides with a predicted IC50 <15 nM were selected for further analysis. In addition, one peptide with an IC50 of 50–500 nM (intermediate binder) and another peptide with an IC50 >500 nM (weak binder) were used as control peptides. Epitopes were checked on the Immune Epitope Database to ensure they had not been reported previously 32. The epitopes were evaluated for homology to confirm their uniqueness within the MTB genome/proteome (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/blast/).

Table 1.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens (n = 94) selected for HLA‐A*11:01‐restricted epitope mapping

Part 1* Part 2 Part 3
Rv0079 Rv1908c Rv2629 Rv0496 Rv0315 Rv2034
Rv0288 Rv1926c Rv2744c Rv0577 Rv0350 Rv2108
Rv0467 Rv1980c Rv2780 Rv0733 Rv0440 Rv2244
Rv0685 Rv1996 Rv3127 Rv0831 Rv0475 Rv2324
Rv0824c Rv2005c Rv3130c Rv1411 Rv0754 Rv2380c
Rv0867c Rv2006 Rv3131 Rv1569 Rv0932c Rv2468c
Rv1009 Rv2029c Rv3132c Rv1626 Rv0934 Rv2770c
Rv1130 Rv2030c Rv3347c Rv1789 Rv0978c Rv2903c
Rv1169c Rv2031c Rv3804c Rv1860 Rv1363c Rv3353c
Rv1174c Rv2032 Rv3873 Rv2220 Rv1478 Rv3418c
Rv1349 Rv2389c Rv3875 Rv2608 Rv1787 Rv3420c
Rv1733c Rv2450c Rv2875 Rv1788 Rv3615c
Rv1738 Rv2620c Rv3020c Rv1790 Rv3716c
Rv1793 Rv2623 Rv3044 Rv1791 Rv3803c
Rv1813c Rv2626c Rv3478 Rv1837c Rv3874
Rv1884c Rv2627c Rv3619c Rv1956 Rv3914
Rv1886c Rv2628 Rv1966

*Reference 12; Reference 11; Reference 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29.

Peptide competition binding assay

The binding affinity of peptides to HLA‐A*11:01 was assessed using the UV‐induced peptide exchange assay 33. Briefly, 50 candidate peptides (see above) were synthesized with a purity of more than 75%. Conditional HLA‐A*11:01 complexes containing UV‐labile peptide ligands were exposed to UV light (366 nm) in the presence or absence of candidate peptides for 30 min. The efficiency of peptide exchange was assessed using an HLA class I‐specific ELISA detecting the β2m, which signals successful HLA class I complex formation. The ELISA product is monitored via absorbance at 414 nm. The net average absorbance of each candidate peptide was normalized to that of the positive control peptide (EBNA416‐424: IVTDFSVIK) 34. The negative control peptide (NPKASLLSL) was included to confirm the specificity of the assay.

Peptide synthesis

Based on the results of UV‐induced peptide exchange assay, the highest binding epitopes were selected for synthesis. These peptides were synthesized by Proimmune (Oxford, UK) and had a purity ≥96% as assessed by HPLC and mass spectroscopy. Peptides were dissolved in PBS or distilled water containing 10% DMSO to stock concentrations of 1 mg/ml. All peptides were aliquoted and stored at −20°C until use.

IFN‐γ ELISPOT assays

ELISPOT assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions to test the ability of the candidate epitopes to activate cytokine release (Mabtech AB, Ellensviksvagen, Sweden). Briefly, PBMCs were thawed and rested overnight before use. Dead cells were removed using magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) to ensure viability. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were seeded (2.5 × 105 cells/well) in anti‐IFN‐γ‐coated ELISPOT plates in 100 μl of complete medium (RPMI + 10% FBS) containing 10 μg/ml peptide. Cells stimulated with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) were used as a positive control and cells cultured in medium alone were used as negative controls. We included a reported HLA class I A*11:01‐restricted epitope peptide (Rv02883‐11, QIMYNYPAM) 35 and ESAT‐6 as referenced in this assay. After incubation for 24 hrs, plates were processed on an ImmunoSpot Analyzer S5 Versa (Cellular Technology Ltd., Cleveland, OH, USA) and spots were counted by ImmunoSpot software 5.0.3 (Cellular Technology Ltd). Results are expressed as the mean number of spot‐forming cells (SFC) per 106 cells from triplicate assays.

Only assays with <50 spots/106 cells for the negative control and >300 spots/106 cells for the PHA positive control were considered valid 36. A response was defined as positive if two criteria were met: (i) the SFC per million of PBMC at least twofold over background, and (ii) the SFC per million of PBMC >50 spots.

T cell proliferation assays

T cell proliferation was assessed using carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) assays as described previously 37, 38. Briefly, PBMCs from study subjects were thawed and dead cells were removed using magnetic beads (see above). The viable cells were washed with PBS and labelled with CFSE (Molecular Probes, Leiden, the Netherlands) at a final concentration of 5 μM for 10 min. at room temperature. After washing and counting, viable cells were seeded in 96‐well round‐bottom plates at a concentration of 2 × 105 cells/well in the presence or absence of each peptide (10 μg/ml) 38 and incubated for 7 days. Phytohemagglutinin (10 μg/ml) was used as positive control to stimulate T cells.

On day 7, cells were stained 20 min. at 4°C for surface markers with anti‐CD8‐phycoerythrin (PE; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and anti‐CD3‐PE‐Cy 7 (eBioscience) and analysed by flow cytometry. Gated CD8+ T cells were examined for CFSE incorporation in proliferated CD8+ T cells. The proportion of proliferating CD8+ T cells was determined based on the reduction in CFSE fluorescence over time.

Dextramer staining of MTB specific T cells

An HLA‐A*11:01 allophycocyanin (APC)‐labelled dextramer carrying Rv3130c194‐204 (p12) and an HLA‐A*02:01 APC‐labelled dextramer carrying an irrelevant epitope, ENV120‐128 (derived from HIV‐1 envelope glycoprotein gp160) 39, were purchased from Immudex (Copenhagen, Denmark). MHC‐dextramer staining was performed following the protocol offered by manufacturer. Briefly, PBMCs of active pulmonary TB patients were stained with dextramers for 10 min. at room temperature, followed by incubation with anti‐CD3 and anti‐CD8 fluorescence‐conjugated mAbs (eBioscience) for 20 min. Then, the cells were analysed by flow cytometry.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. Comparisons between different groups were analysed using anova followed by Tukey's post test correction. Differences with a value of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were analysed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Prediction of epitopes

We tested 350 TB patients from southern China and discovered that HLA‐A*11:01 (32.5%) was the most frequent HLA‐A allele, with a frequency at least 10% higher than other alleles (Fig. 1). This was consistent with the reports published on Allele Frequency Net Database on HLA frequency distribution in China 40.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Frequency of HLA‐A alleles in active pulmonary TB patients from southern China. Fresh blood samples of active pulmonary TB patients (n = 350) were collected and HLA alleles were typed by the sequence‐based typing method. HLA‐A*11:01 is the most frequent allele in the HLA‐A loci as shown.

HLA‐A*11:01‐restricted CD8+ T cell epitopes were predicted by NetMHCcons. We choose 48 top‐ranked epitopes based on binding affinity. These epitopes consist of 8–11 amino acids, none of which had been defined as an epitope previously. Besides, we analysed the homology of the epitopes within the MTB genome/proteome and the uniqueness of their amino acid sequences were confirmed except for Rv1787163‐172 (p45), which has 100% sequence identity with Rv1790163‐172 (not included). Because both antigens are PPE family proteins with high identity among them, we did not exclude this epitope. The information of the epitopes is shown in Table 2. For control purposes, one peptide with an intermediate affinity (p49) and one with weak affinity (p50) were included.

Table 2.

Predicted CD8+ T cell epitopes based on their affinity to HLA‐A*11:01

No. Antigen Sequence Binding affinity (IC50, nM)a
p1 Rv3478258‐267 MTNTLHSMLK 4.67
p2 Rv2220258‐265 KTVTFMPK 5.29
p3 Rv3130c5‐13 TTLDAGFLK 5.90
p4 Rv1569231‐239 VVMTTTLSK 6.16
p5 Rv2029c186‐194 ISSGVFLLK 6.40
p6 Rv391478‐87 VSIPTLILFK 6.97
p7 Rv1884c SSMTRIAK 7.16
p8 Rv119652‐62 MLFSMHGELYK 7.36
p9 Rv100934‐42 TAMRVTTMK 7.69
p10 Rv049642‐49 STIDEFAK 7.73
p11 Rv3347c1794‐1801 TTSPIPLK 7.94
p12 Rv3130c194‐204 AVMAGIVRAAK 8.07
p13 Rv1349477‐485 VSIARALLK 8.11
p14 Rv1790286‐295 AVAAPAFAEK 8.16
p15 Rv1980c122‐130 GTHPTTTYK 8.25
p16 Rv0867c9‐17 TTSNVSVAK 8.25
p17 Rv3873159‐166 AVNTLFEK 8.34
p18 Rv313182‐90 KVNRFPDPK 8.34
p19 Rv3347c2924‐2933 MTSGSSSGFK 8.34
p20 Rv1980c108‐115 GTQAVVLK 8.52
p21 Rv20061135‐1143 SVNNYQASK 8.61
p22 Rv0467326‐334 ATIAKFQK 8.80
p23 Rv1363c153‐161 MTSLDFNK 8.80
p24 Rv0824262‐269 VVMPVLKK 8.94
p25 Rv0440267‐275 GTFKSVAVK 9.65
p26 Rv3130c439‐448 AVARLVAISK 9.86
p27 Rv068526‐34 TTLTAAITK 9.86
p28 Rv1908c632‐639 RVLGANYK 10.07
p29 Rv232421‐29 ATFAEIGHK 10.69
p30 Rv1908c179‐187 KTFGFGFGR 11.11
p31 Rv2389c111‐120 KTQGPGAWPK 11.60
p32 Rv1980c26‐33 KTYCEELK 11.66
p33 Rv1411216‐223 SVQMTLSK 11.79
p34 Rv2108186‐196 TVFDYHNENAK 11.79
p35 Rv3132c501‐509 VSNAVRHAK 12.24
p36 Rv2780297‐307 CVANMPASVPK 12.58
p37 Rv2108114‐121 RVQTTVLK 12.64
p38 Rv2780250‐259 VSNSLVAHMK 12.64
p39 Rv2380c1276‐1283 AVAVVLHK 12.99
p40 Rv203237‐45 HTVALFLDK 12.99
p41 Rv195618‐26 AIAADPSFK 13.06
p42 Rv2030c289‐297 MTQWLIEEK 13.13
p43 Rv0932c192‐199 GTSDNFQK 13.20
p44 Rv1130239‐248 KAFAPAHAGK 13.71
p45 Rv1787163‐172 RLIPFAAPPK 13.71
p46 Rv2380c720‐728 TVINASRFK 13.79
p47 Rv0440261‐270 VVNKIRGTFK 13.94
p48 Rv1966108‐115 ATTAFGAK 14.09
p49 Rv1037c67‐74 QANAHGQK 326.55
p50 Rv1037c80‐89 NNMAQTDSAV 29,745.00
a

Epitope‐binding affinity is indicated as 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50). IC50 ≤ 50 nM: high affinity; 50 nM ≤ IC50 ≤ 500 nM: intermediate affinity; IC50 ≥ 500 nM: weak affinity.

Binding affinity of candidate peptides

To evaluate the actual binding of candidate peptides to HLA‐A*11:01, we performed HLA stabilization assays utilizing UV‐induced peptide exchange. The binding of each peptide to HLA‐A*11:01 is reported as a percentage relative to the positive control peptide EBNA416‐424, which is a strong binder to HLA‐A*11:01. From these experiments, 22 peptides showed stronger binding (>100%) to HLA‐A*11:01 than the positive peptide; 11 peptides showed a relative binding of 81–98%, 16 peptides showed a relative binding of 17–79% and one peptide did not bind (Fig. 2). We set a cut‐off value on 100% for binders. A subset of 22 peptides >100% relative binding were selected for further studies to assess their ability to stimulate PBMCs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Binding affinity of predicted peptides to HLA‐A*11:01 by UV‐induced peptide exchange assay. HLA class I‐specific ELISA assays based on the detection of β2‐microglobulin were used to compare the stability of HLA complexes after UV‐illumination without (UV) or with rescue peptides (Pos., Neg. or predicted peptides). The net average absorbance of the exchanged peptide is normalized to Pos. Binding affinity of each peptide to HLA‐A*11:01 is reported as a percentage relative to Pos. The dotted line indicates a 100% cut‐off value. Bars represent mean ± S.D. of n = 3 for each group. Pos., positive control peptide; Neg., negative control peptide; UV, no peptide.

T cell recognition of peptides in active pulmonary TB patients

To examine the recognition of peptides in MTB‐infected subjects, we tested IFN‐γ response of PBMCs from 30 HLA‐A*11:01‐restricted active pulmonary TB patients. We used fresh peripheral blood‐derived PBMCs ex vivo to minimize artifacts from in vitro restimulation. The frequency of epitope‐specific IFN‐γ‐producing CD8+ T cells was determined by ELISPOT assay. Rv02883‐11, a strong CD8+ T cell epitope belonging to the low molecular weight protein antigen 7 esxH (i.e., protein TB10.4) and antigen ESAT‐6, was used as positive control. Each of the 22 tested peptides was recognized by PBMCs of at least one patient. Moreover, all patients responded to at least one peptide, though some patients responded to as many as 9 or 10 peptides (i.e. patients 3 and 30) (Table 3). Six of the 22 tested peptides showed significant recognition by active TB patients, with a rate of response of more than 40%. These six epitopes were derived from different proteins (Fig. 3B and Table 4). As expected, the antigen ESAT‐6 was recognized by almost all of the patients (29/30). The highest frequency of IFN‐γ‐producing CD8+ T cell responses was detected against p12 (Rv3130c194‐204) peptide epitope (70%), with a higher rate than that observed for Rv02883‐11 (55%). Obviously, peptides that were widely recognized also elicited more potent T cell responses (Fig. 3A). Six epitopes that were extensively recognized by active TB patients were selected for further immunogenic analyses.

Table 3.

Characteristics of patients with TB and recognized peptides

Patient ID Gender Age HLA‐A*11:01 peptide recognition
1 M 25 p16/p24/P45/p46
2 M 30 p6/p9/p12/p15/p25/p29/46
3 F 35 p8/p9/p12/p16/p24/p25/p26/p29/p45/p46
4 M 33 p12/p24/p46
5 F 32 p3/p12/p35/P45
6 F 23 p1/p5/p9/p12/p13/p29
7 M 45 p12/p15/p21/p31/p45
8 M 39 p4/p15/p26/p29/45
9 M 29 p1/p3/p6/p8/p14/p21/p46
10 F 29 p1/p12/p15/p29/p46
11 F 68 p15/p16/p45/p46
12 M 22 p13/p15/p45
13 F 21 p12/p15/p29/p47
14 F 25 p8/p13/p16/p29
15 F 26 p12/p13/p15/p16/p26
16 F 28 p15/45/p46
17 M 43 p12/p16
18 M 40 P12/p16/p29
19 F 40 p12/p45
20 M 44 p12/p16/p46
21 M 21 p45
22 M 32 p12/p15/p46
23 M 38 p12/p16/p29
24 F 35 p12/p15/p45
25 F 40 p12/p16/p29/p46
26 F 50 p16/24/p45/p46
27 M 43 p6/p9/p12/p15/p25/p29/p46
28 M 47 p12/p15/p16/p29/p45/p46
29 M 31 p12/p16/p29/p45
30 F 26 p8/p9/p12/p16/p24/p25/p29/p45/p46

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Recognition of HLA‐A*11:01‐restricted peptides by active pulmonary TB patients. PBMCs from HLA‐A*11:01‐positive active pulmonary TB patients (n = 30) were stimulated in vitro with individual peptides for 24 hrs. The number of epitope‐specific IFN‐γ‐producing T cells was determined by the ELISPOT assay (A). Percentage of HLA‐A*11:01‐positive active pulmonary TB patients responding to each individual epitope (B).

Table 4.

Information of six MTB proteinsa

Epitope Gene name Molecular mass (kD) Product
Rv3130c194‐204 Tgs1 50.7 Triacylglycerol synthase Tgs1
Rv1980c122‐130 Mpt64 24.8 Immunogenic protein Mpt64
Rv0867c9‐17 RpfA 39.9 Resuscitation‐promoting factor RpfA
Rv232421‐29 Rv2324 16.3 Transcriptional regulatory protein
Rv1787163‐172 PPE25 37.1 PPE family protein PPE25
Rv2380c720‐728 MbtE 18.3 Peptide synthetase MbtE
a

Information is from http://www.tbdb.org/.

Next, we compared the IFN‐γ‐producing CD8+ T cells from HLA‐A*11:01‐positive healthy individuals and HLA‐A*11:01‐negative active pulmonary TB patients with that of HLA‐A*11:01‐positive patients. For all six epitopes, significantly (P < 0.05) more CD8+ T cells from HLA‐A*11:01‐positive TB patients produced IFN‐γ than cells from the other groups (Fig. 4). p5 (Rv2029c186‐194), which was inefficient at stimulating IFN‐γ production from the CD8+ T cells of HLA‐A*11:01‐positive patients (3% response), also failed to elicit significant IFN‐γ‐producing CD8+ T cell responses in other two groups (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of the frequency of epitope‐specific IFN‐γ‐producing CD8+ T cells in HLA‐A*11:01‐positive healthy individuals, HLA‐A*11:01‐negative active pulmonary TB patients and HLA‐A*11:01‐positive active pulmonary TB patients. PBMCs from healthy individuals (n = 15) and active pulmonary TB patients (n = 15 and n = 25 for HLA*11:01‐negative and ‐positive individuals, respectively) were stimulated in vitro with individual peptides for 24 hrs and the frequency of epitope‐specific IFN‐γ‐producing CD8+ T cells were determined by the ELISPOT assay. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 versus the HLA‐A*11:01(+)PTB.

Specific CD8+ T cell proliferation induced by HLA‐A*11:01‐restricted peptides

The epitopes were further assessed for their capacity to induce CD8+ T cell proliferation in active TB patients and healthy subjects. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were labelled with CFSE and restimulated in vitro with individual epitope peptides.

Figure 5A shows representative proliferation profiles of CD8+ T cells (one patient) in response to different epitopes and control conditions in one active TB patient. Following stimulation of PBMCs with epitopes or PHA (positive control), significant CD8+ T cell proliferation was observed. Little proliferation was observed in response to peptide Rv2029c186‐194 or medium alone. We also tested the proliferation of CD8+ T cells from HLA‐A*11:01‐positive healthy individuals (n = 10) and HLA‐A*11:01‐negative TB patients (n = 10) after in vitro restimulation with different epitopes. As expected, epitope‐specific CD8+ T cell expansion only occurred in in PBMCs from HLA‐A*11:01‐positive TB patients (n = 10) (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Epitope‐specific CD8+ T cell proliferation in PBMCs from active pulmonary TB patients. PBMCs from HLA‐A*11:01‐positive healthy individuals, HLA‐A*11:01‐negative active TB patients and HLA‐A*11:01‐positive active pulmonary TB patients were stimulated with individual peptides or PHA. After 7 days, CD8+ T cell proliferation were examined by flow cytometry. Plots are gated on CD3+ CD8+. The proliferation of CD8+ T cells is shown as the percentage of decrease in CFSE expression. (A) A proliferation profile of CD8+ T cells from a representative active pulmonary TB patient after in vitro stimulation with individual epitopes for 7 days. (B) Proliferation of epitope‐specific CD8+ T cells in HLA‐A*11:01‐positive healthy individuals, HLA‐A*11:01‐negative active TB patients and HLA‐A*11:01‐positive active TB patients. Bars represent mean ± S.D. of n = 10 for each group. w/o: negative control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 versus the HLA‐A*11:01(+)PTB.

HLA‐A*11:01 tetramer staining of epitope specific CD8+ T in active TB

An HLA‐A*11:01 dextramer was constructed carrying the epitope p12, the epitope most frequently recognized by patient CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3B); an HLA‐A*02:01 dextramer carrying an irrelevant peptide (ENV120‐128) was used as negative control. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HLA‐A*11:01‐positive or ‐negative TB patients were stained ex vivo with optimized concentrations of APC‐labelled dextramers. While significant amount of epitope‐specific CD8+ T cells were detectable in PBMCs from HLA‐A*11:01‐positive TB patients (Fig. 6, right panel), no dextramer‐positive CD8+ T cells were observed in the control groups (Fig. 6, left and middle panels). This demonstrates that MTB‐specific CD8+ T cells accumulate to a substantial number in response to exposure to p12.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Dextramer staining of epitope‐specific CD8+ T cell in active pulmonary TB patients. PBMCs from HLA‐A*11:01‐positive pulmonary TB patients (n = 4) were stained with dextramers displaying epitopes ENV 120‐128 (left panel) or p12 (right panel), and PBMCs from HLA‐A*11:01‐negative active pulmonary TB patients (n = 4) were stained with dextramers displaying p12 (middle panel). PBMCs were costained with anti‐CD3 and ‐CD8 antibodies. Peptide‐specific CD8+ T cells were analysed by flow cytometry. Dextramers displaying ENV 120‐128 and HLA‐A*11:01‐negative PBMCs were used as negative controls. Representative flow cytometry patterns are shown.

Discussion

Tuberculosis remains a major public health problem and economic burden worldwide because of the morbidity and mortality caused by this disease 41. Intense efforts had been offered to develop a new vaccine to prevent this deadly disease. Mouse studies have suggested that MHC class I‐mediated CD8+ T cells have a critical role in protective immunity against TB 42. Identification of antigens and/or their epitopes that are capable of boosting CD8+ T cell responses could be of great importance in vaccine development.

Although new immunogenic MTB antigen epitopes have been defined recently, significant voids remain in the area of epitope identification. Epitopes detectable by human T cells have only been identified in approximately 4% of the MTB proteome and about 65% of the reported epitopes are derived from the top 30 most frequently studied proteins (e.g., ESAT‐6 and CFP‐10), leaving the majority of the MTB proteome (consisting of approximate 4000 proteins) unexplored. In addition, relatively few of the known epitopes reported are detectable by CD8+ T cell epitopes 32, 44. Present vaccine candidates are often based on a limited number of T cell protein or epitope antigens, which might narrow the breadth of the immune response. For example, focused immune response against immunodominant epitopes were reported to deregulate the immune system's ability to centre on protective subdominant epitopes of MTB 45, 46 and were associated with a poor prognosis in an AIDS model 47.

Furthermore, most published CD8+ T cell epitopes to date are presented by HLA subtypes expressed by Caucasian populations, particularly the HLA‐A*02:01 allele 40, 43. This is problematic because the highest TB burdens in the world are located in South‐East Asia, Sub‐Saharan Africa and Western Pacific 3. As more attention is put into these areas, we need to identify immunodominant epitopes restricted by HLA‐type prominent in these areas, such as HLA‐A*11:01, to develop new subunit vaccines and diagnostic strategies.

Binding affinity to allele‐specific MHC molecules proved to be an important parameter for discovering immunodominant epitopes. A study led by Sette built a binding threshold that was suitable for many known CTL epitopes 31. This finding was confirmed by a later study, which suggested the correlation between affinity and immunogenicity 48. An increasing number of in silico methods based on binding affinity have been developed. Algorithms that narrow the number of peptides that may generate peptide‐MHC interactions reduce both experimental and financial burdens 49. NetMHCcons is a consensus method for the MHC I binding motif predictions, which takes advantage of three mainstream prediction methods including NetMHC, NetMHCpan and Pickpocket 30. However, experimental assays are still needed to validate these predictions. The UV‐induced peptide exchange technique, introduced first by Ton N M Schumacher for the generation of MHC multimers, is well suited for the rapid assessment of MHC binding properties of extensive peptide libraries 33, 50. EBNA416‐424 (IVTDFSVIK) is an immunogenic epitope with high affinity to HLA‐A11 and properly used as a reference to narrow the scope and obtain optimal epitopes, although this reference method may miss some epitopes for which the binding affinity is below the cut‐off value.

Binding affinity alone is not sufficient for immunogenicity; functional assays are also needed to validate the predicted peptide epitopes. Various types of functional assays are used for detection of antigen‐specific T cells, such as ELISPOT, intracellular cytokine stain and cytokine capture. ELISPOT assay is sensitive for low‐frequency antigen‐specific T cells detection, with a resolution of one in 100,000 cells, which is one or two orders of magnitude higher than that of flow cytometry‐based techniques 51. In addition, ELISPOT assay identifies antigen‐specific T cells at the single cell level without long‐term in vitro culture. This provides the unbiased information of the in vivo cellular frequency in an individual and offers a strong evidence of immunological activation 51, 52. Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester has been found to be effective at monitoring T cell division since its first description by Lyons and Parish, and then became a routine tool for the assessment of proliferation of lymphocytes with its high sensitivity and low toxicity to cells 37, 53. In our experiments, significant epitope‐specific CD8+ T cell proliferation was observed after 7 days of stimulation in active TB patients, which highlights the capability of our epitopes in boosting the MTB‐specific responses.

Only limited number of studies have reported the use of an MHC tetramer to gauge MTB‐specific T cells in PBMCs. In most cases, the HLA‐A*02:01 tetramer has been used. Multimers constructed with other HLA molecules are needed to visualize the complexity of MHC‐restricted T cell responses 54. Dextramers have a higher valency than tetramers and are useful for the detection of T cells with low‐affinity T cell receptors 55. In this study, we used a dextramer synthesized with the Rv3130c194‐204 epitope and found a significantly higher fraction of CD8+ T cells stained positive for the Rv3130c194‐204 dextramer from HLA‐A*11:01‐positive patients than from the controls. This further confirmed the HLA restriction of this epitope. Importantly, ex vivo identification of the epitope‐specific T cells interaction signifies the value of this particular epitope for vaccine development and clinical diagnosis. Because of our limited funds, we couldn't afford to construct dextramers loaded with the other five epitopes. However, it is highly probable that antigen‐specific CD8+ T cells could be detected for these other epitopes because they displayed immunogenic properties similar to Rv3130c194‐204.

In conclusion, combining algorithmic prediction with experimental validation, we defined six novel CD8+ T cell epitopes. These epitopes were derived from six different antigenic MTB proteins (Rv3130c, Rv1980c, Rv0867c, Rv2324, Rv1787 and Rv2380c) and are presented by HLA‐A*11:01. Epitope‐specific CD8+ T cells were detected by an HLA‐A*11:01 dextramer loaded with one of the six epitopes, Rv3130c194‐204. Our results suggested that these epitopes might serve as potential targets for future vaccine design and diagnostic strategies.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by grants from National Science and Technology Key Projects on Major Infectious Diseases (2012ZX10003002‐007), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81171539, 81371764, 81571951), Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2012), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2014A030313322), Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province (2013B010404020), Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Guangdong Province Discipline Construction Special Funds (2013KJCX0036) and Guangzhou Municipal Industry and Research Collaborative Innovation Program (201508020248).

References

  • 1. Dye C, Scheele S, Dolin P, et al Consensus statement. Global burden of tuberculosis: estimated incidence, prevalence, and mortality by country. WHO Global Surveillance and Monitoring Project. JAMA. 1999; 282: 677–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Vynnycky E, Fine PE. Lifetime risks, incubation period, and serial interval of tuberculosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152: 247–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. WHO Report—Global tuberculosis control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available at http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cooper AM. Cell‐mediated immune responses in tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009; 27: 393–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Barker LF, Brennan MJ, Rosenstein PK, et al Tuberculosis vaccine research: the impact of immunology. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009; 21: 331–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Foulds KE, Wu CY, Seder RA. Th1 memory: implications for vaccine development. Immunol Rev. 2006; 211: 58–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Stenger S. An antimicrobial activity of cytolytic t cells mediated by granulysin. Science. 1998; 282: 121–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Flynn JL, Goldstein MM, Triebold KJ, et al Major histocompatibility complex class I‐restricted T cells are required for resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992; 89: 12013–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Colditz GA, Brewer TF, Berkey CS, et al Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis. Meta‐analysis of the published literature. JAMA. 1994; 271: 698–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Revised BCG vaccination guidelines for infants at risk for HIV infection. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2007; 82: 193–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Bertholet S, Ireton GC, Kahn M, et al Identification of human T cell antigens for the development of vaccines against Mycobacterium tuberculosis . J Immunol. 2008; 181: 7948–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Zvi A, Ariel N, Fulkerson J, et al Whole genome identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine candidates by comprehensive data mining and bioinformatic analyses. BMC Med Genomics. 2008; 1: 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Coler RN, Dillon DC, Skeiky YAW, et al Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine candidates using human CD4+ T‐cells expression cloning. Vaccine. 2009; 27: 223–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sundaramurthi JC, Brindha S, Shobitha SR, et al In silico identification of potential antigenic proteins and promiscuous CTL epitopes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Infect Genet Evol. 2012; 12: 1312–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kaufmann SH. How can immunology contribute to the control of tuberculosis? Nat Rev Immunol. 2001; 1: 20–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Caccamo N, Guggino G, Meraviglia S, et al Analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis‐specific CD8 T‐cells in patients with active tuberculosis and in individuals with latent infection. PLoS ONE. 2009; 4: e5528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 17. Geluk A, van Meijgaarden KE, Franken KL, et al Identification of major epitopes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis AG85B that are recognized by HLA‐A*0201‐restricted CD8+ T cells in HLA‐transgenic mice and humans. J Immunol. 2000; 165: 6463–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mustafa AS, Al‐Attiyah R, Hanif SNM, et al Efficient testing of large pools of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RD1 peptides and identification of major antigens and immunodominant peptides recognized by human Th1 cells. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008; 15: 916–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chang CXL, Tan AT, Or MY, et al Conditional ligands for Asian HLA variants facilitate the definition of CD8+ T‐cell responses in acute and chronic viral diseases. Eur J Immunol. 2013; 43: 1109–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Commandeur S, van Meijgaarden KE, Prins C, et al An unbiased genome‐wide Mycobacterium tuberculosis gene expression approach to discover antigens targeted by human T cells expressed during pulmonary infection. J Immunol. 2013; 190: 1659–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Al‐Attiyah R, Mustafa AS. Characterization of human cellular immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins encoded by genes predicted in RD15 genomic region that is absent in Mycobacterium bovis BCG. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010; 59: 177–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Christy AJ, Dharman K, Dhandapaani G, et al Epitope based recombinant BCG vaccine elicits specific Th1 polarized immune responses in BALB/c mice. Vaccine. 2012; 30: 1364–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Place S, Verscheure V, de San N, et al Heparin‐binding, hemagglutinin‐specific IFN‐γ synthesis at the site of infection during active tuberculosis in humans. Am J Resp Crit Care. 2010; 182: 848–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wang L, Nagata T, Tsujimura K, et al Identification of HLA‐DR4‐restricted T‐cell epitope on MPT51 protein, a major secreted protein derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis using MPT51 overlapping peptides screening and DNA vaccination. Vaccine. 2010; 28: 2026–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Deenadayalan A, Heaslip D, Rajendiran AA, et al Immunoproteomic identification of human T cell antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that differentiate healthy contacts from tuberculosis patients. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010; 9: 538–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mukhopadhyay S, Balaji KN. The PE and PPE proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Tuberculosis. 2011; 91: 441–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Byun E, Kim WS, Shin A, et al Rv0315, a novel immunostimulatory antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, activates dendritic cells and drives Th1 immune responses. J Mol Med. 2012; 90: 285–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Li Q, Ding X, Thomas JJ, et al Rv2468c, a novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein that costimulates human CD4+ T cells through VLA‐5. J Leukoc Biol. 2012; 91: 311–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Millington KA, Fortune SM, Low J, et al Rv3615c is a highly immunodominant RD1 (Region of Difference 1)‐dependent secreted antigen specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108: 5730–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Karosiene E, Lundegaard C, Lund O, et al NetMHCcons: a consensus method for the major histocompatibility complex class I predictions. Immunogenetics. 2012; 64: 177–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sette A, Vitiello A, Reherman B, et al The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes. J Immunol. 1994; 153: 5586–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Vita R, Zarebski L, Greenbaum JA, et al The immune epitope database 2.0. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 38: D854–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Toebes M, Coccoris M, Bins A, et al Design and use of conditional MHC class I ligands. Nat Med. 2006; 12: 246–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Reali E, Guerrini R, Marastoni M, et al A single specific amino acid residue in peptide antigens is sufficient to activate memory CTL: potential role of cross‐reactive peptides in memory T cell maintenance. J Immunol. 1999; 162: 106–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Axelsson‐Robertson R, Weichold F, Sizemore D, et al Extensive major histocompatibility complex class I binding promiscuity for Mycobacterium tuberculosis TB10.4 peptides and immune dominance of human leucocyte antigen (HLA)‐B*0702 and HLA‐B*0801 alleles in TB10.4 CD8 T‐cell responses. Immunology. 2010; 129: 496–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Harari A, Rozot V, Enders FB, et al Dominant TNF‐α+ Mycobacterium tuberculosis–specific CD4+ T cell responses discriminate between latent infection and active disease. Nat Med. 2011; 17: 372–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Hawkins ED, Hommel M, Turner ML, et al Measuring lymphocyte proliferation, survival and differentiation using CFSE time‐series data. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2: 2057–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Commandeur S, Lin MY, van Meijgaarden KE, et al Double‐ and monofunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis DosR antigens and peptides in long‐term latently infected individuals. Eur J Immunol. 2011; 41: 2925–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Altfeld MA, Livingston B, Reshamwala N, et al Identification of novel HLA‐A2‐restricted human immunodeficiency virus type 1‐specific cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte epitopes predicted by the HLA‐A2 supertype peptide‐binding motif. J Virol. 2001; 75: 1301–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Gonzalez‐Galarza FF, Christmas S, Middleton D, et al Allele frequency net: a database and online repository for immune gene frequencies in worldwide populations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 39: D913–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Raviglione M, Marais B, Floyd K, et al Scaling up interventions to achieve global tuberculosis control: progress and new developments. Lancet. 2012; 379: 1902–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Woodworth JS, Behar SM. Mycobacterium tuberculosis‐specific CD8+ T cells and their role in immunity. Crit Rev Immunol. 2006; 26: 317–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Blythe MJ, Zhang Q, Vaughan K, et al An analysis of the epitope knowledge related to Mycobacteria. Immunome Res. 2007; 3: 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Axelsson‐Robertson R, Magalhaes I, Parida SK, et al The immunological footprint of Mycobacterium tuberculosis T‐cell epitope recognition. J Infect Dis. 2012; 205: S301–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Geluk A, van Meijgaarden KE, Joosten SA, et al Innovative strategies to identify M. tuberculosis antigens and epitopes using genome‐wide analyses. Front Immunol. 2014; 5: 256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Aagaard CS, Hoang TT, Vingsbo‐Lundberg C, et al Quality and vaccine efficacy of CD4+ T cell responses directed to dominant and subdominant epitopes in ESAT‐6 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis . J Immunol. 2009; 183: 2659–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Friedrich TC, Valentine LE, Yant LJ, et al Subdominant CD8+ T‐cell responses are involved in durable control of AIDS virus replication. J Virol. 2007; 81: 3465–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Alexander J, Oseroff C, Sidney J, et al Derivation of HLA‐A11/Kb transgenic mice: functional CTL repertoire and recognition of human A11‐restricted CTL epitopes. J Immunol. 1997; 159: 4753–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kessler JH, Melief CJ. Identification of T‐cell epitopes for cancer immunotherapy. Leukemia. 2007; 21: 1859–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hoppes R, Ekkebus R, Schumacher TNM, et al Technologies for MHC class I immunoproteomics. J Proteomics. 2010; 73: 1945–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Anthony DD, Lehmann PV. T‐cell epitope mapping using the ELISPOT approach. Methods. 2003; 29: 260–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. McMurry JA, Kimball S, Lee JH, et al Epitope‐driven TB vaccine development: a streamlined approach using immuno‐informatics, ELISpot assays, and HLA transgenic mice. Curr Mol Med. 2007; 7: 351–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Mannering SI, Morris JS, Jensen KP, et al A sensitive method for detecting proliferation of rare autoantigen‐specific human T cells. J Immunol Methods. 2003; 283: 173–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Weichold FF, Mueller S, Kortsik C, et al Impact of MHC class I alleles on the M. tuberculosis antigen‐specific CD8+ T‐cell response in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Genes Immun. 2007; 8: 334–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Schøller J, Singh M, Bergmeier L, et al A recombinant human HLA‐class I antigen linked to dextran elicits innate and adaptive immune responses. J Immunol Methods. 2010; 360: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES