Skip to main content
Schizophrenia Bulletin logoLink to Schizophrenia Bulletin
. 2016 Jun 25;42(5):1304. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw091

Erratum

PMCID: PMC4988754  PMID: 27343488

Erratum to: Pinkham AE, Penn DL, Green MF, Harvey PD. Social cognition psychometric evaluation: results of the initial psychometric study. Schizophr Bull. 2015;42(2):494–504.

In table 5, several lines were inadvertently omitted during typesetting, making it appear that the regression model for the SSPA average contained redundant variables. The complete table is provided below, and the formerly missing lines are now in bold.

Table 5.

Regression Models Demonstrating the Overall Contribution of the Social Cognitive Tasks to Outcomes

R 2 Adjusted R 2 F P b* t P sr 2
UPSA total .332 .308 13.92 <.001
 BLERT −.08 −.88 .382 .003
 ER-40 .11 1.28 .20 .007
 Eyes .09 .99 .32 .004
 Hinting .29 3.91 <.001 .06
 RAD .19 2.29 .02 .02
 TASIT .13 1.47 .15 .008
SSPA average .186 .156 6.35 <.001
 BLERT .04 .39 .70 .000
 ER-40 .05 .48 .63 .001
 Eyes .08 .77 .44 .002
 Hinting .29 3.46 .001 .06
 RAD .01 .12 .91 .000
 TASIT .09 .90 .37 .004
SLOF total .125 .104 6.04 <.001
 BLERT .21 2.35 .02 .03
 Hinting .04 .52 .60 .001
 RAD −.02 −.26 .79 .000
 TASIT .19 1.94 .05 .02
SLOF-HQ .190 .159 6.13 <.001
 AIHQ-BS −.12 −1.52 .13 .01
 BLERT .38 3.83 <.001 .09
 Hinting −.01 −.08 .94 .000
 RAD −.05 −.47 .64 .001
 TASIT .08 .72 .47 .003

Note: SLOF-HQ indicates ratings from high-quality informants (ie, professionals with mental health experience). AIHQ, Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire; BLERT, Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task; b*, standardized coefficients; RAD, Relationships Across Domains; TASIT, The Awareness of Social Inferences Test.


Articles from Schizophrenia Bulletin are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES