Abstract
Background
SPATA7 mutations have been associated with different autosomal recessive retinal degeneration phenotypes. Long-term follow-up has not been described in detail.
Materials and methods
A Hispanic patient with SPATA7 mutations was evaluated serially over a 12-year period with kinetic and static chromatic perimetry, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (AF) imaging. Electroretinography (ERG) was performed at the initial visit.
Results
The patient was homozygous for a mutation in SPATA7 (p.V458fs). At age 9, the ERG showed an abnormally reduced but preserved rod b-wave but no detectable cone signals. There were two islands of vision: a midperipheral island with greater cone than rod dysfunction and a central island with normal cone but no rod function. Serial measures of rod and cone vision and co-localized retinal structure showed that the midperipheral island slowly became undetectable. By age 21, only the central island and its cone function remained, but it had become more abnormal in structure and function.
Conclusion
The disease resulting from SPATA7 mutations in this patient initially presented as a cone-rod dystrophy (CRD), but changed over time into a phenotype more reminiscent of late-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The differential diagnosis for both CRD and RP should include this rare molecular cause of autosomal retinal degeneration. An evolving phenotype complicates not only clinical diagnosis and patient counselling but also future strategies aimed at treating specific retinal regions.
Keywords: cone rod dystrophy, optical coherence tomography, perimetry, rod, cilium, cone
INTRODUCTION
The underlying gene for the LCA3 locus on chromosome 14q241 is now known to be SPATA7 (spermatogenesis-associated protein 7).2 The expression of SPATA7 has been localized to the photoreceptor connecting cilium. The main function of SPATA7 is involved in protein trafficking, including the correct localization of rhodopsin from the inner to the outer segments. The mislocalization of rhodopsin to the inner segments is likely to be the main defect that triggers cell degeneration in the retinopathy caused by SPATA7 mutations.2
The original clinical description of patients now known to have SPATA7 mutations was that of autosomal recessive Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), but as more individuals were molecularly identified, other phenotypes were described.3–6 Based on a functional classification, two main forms of SPATA7-retinopathy have been described in the literature: the first one was characterized as having rods more severely affected than cones (i.e. rod-cone dystrophy)4 and a second form showed cones to be more severely affected than rods (i.e. cone-rod dystrophy).5 With some exceptions,5,6 most of the phenotype data are descriptions of patients at their single visits to a clinic.
We had the opportunity to examine clinically and with visual function and retinal imaging the natural history over a 12-year span of a patient with SPATA7 mutations. We noted an unexpected change from a cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) phenotype to a presentation more like severe RP with unmeasurable function other than preserved visual acuity with central retinal lamination. Our case highlights how an evolving phenotype complicates accurate clinical diagnosis and the ability to provide counselling to a patient and their family; and it lends support to the argument for broad molecular DNA testing to complement ophthalmic testing.7 Given increasing treatment options for rare diseases, a diagnosis made at an earlier rather than later disease stage could become vision-saving.
CASE REPORT
A 9-year-old asymptomatic Hispanic boy presented with a diagnosis of RP which was made two years earlier on a routine eye examination. At that time, retinal pigmentary changes were observed by funduscopy and there was an abnormal ERG. We performed complete examinations at ages 9,11,13,17 and 21. At age 9, best-corrected visual acuities were 20/25 (with a −1.50 refraction) OD and 20/32 (with a −1.25 +0.50 × 180° refraction) OS. Color vision with a Farnsworth D15 panel was normal. There was no nystagmus or anterior segment abnormalities. Funduscopy showed a waxy-appearing optic nerve head, minimal vessel attenuation, a bull’s eye-like change in the macula and a tigroid appearance to the periphery. A standard full-field ERG showed reduced rod-mediated b-wave amplitudes, mixed cone-rod ERG with reduced a- and b-waves, and non-detectable cone-mediated responses (Figure 1A). Kinetic fields with the V-4e target were limited to a small (<5°) central island of vision and a midperipheral island of vision (Figure 1B). The ERG and visual field data were consistent with a cone-rod dystrophy (CRD).8,9 Serial data over 12 years showed progressive loss of the midperipheral island of vision by kinetic perimetry and further constriction of the residual central island (Figure 1B). By age 17, vision was detectable only near fixation. Visual acuity remained stable but refractive error became more myopic by about 1.50 diopters.
Molecular screening for mutations in 163 retinal disease genes was performed by next generation sequencing (See Supplementary Table 1). The only mutations found were in the known retinal disease gene SPATA7. These homozygous SPATA7 mutations (c.1373del, p.V458fs) were then confirmed by Sanger sequencing.10 Cosegregation studies were then performed and the parents were both heterozygous for this change. There was no parental consanguinity known. The p.V458fs mutation is one of sixteen known mutations associated with retinal degeneration reported to date in SPATA7 (See Supplementary Figure S1).
Rod- and cone-mediated function was also explored with chromatic static perimetry (dark-adapted with 500- and 650-nm stimuli; light-adapted with 600-nm stimulus; 200-ms duration, 1.7° diameter target). Mediation by rod or cone photoreceptors was determined by comparison of dark-adapted sensitivities to the 500- and 650-nm stimuli.11–13 Sensitivities were measured on a 12° grid across the field and at 2° intervals along vertical and horizontal meridians. Sensitivity profiles at age 9 revealed a central island of near normal, cone-mediated function separated from a nasal field island of near normal rod vision but abnormal cone function by an absolute scotoma (Figure 1C). The nasal field island diminished in rod and cone sensitivity within 4 years and was not detectable at age 17; the central cone island persisted. Remnants of midperipheral cone-mediated function observed at this location at age 9 were no longer detectable at age 13 (Figure 1C).
Maps of rod and cone sensitivity loss provide a view of the disease topography and its progression over the 12-year span (Figure 1D). At age 9, there was measurable rod more than cone function in the midperiphery beyond a dense pericentral scotoma surrounding the island of cone function at fixation; the extracentral function was consistent with the CRD-type ERG findings. At later visits, there was increasing rod and cone dysfunction and by age 17 (and 21, not shown) rod function was not detectable whereas cone function remained measurable at fixation. The pattern of retinal dysfunction at ages 17 and 21 was consistent with RP.13
What is the retinal structure underlying this pattern of dysfunction? OCT retinal cross-sections were acquired at all visits (age 9 and 11: time-domain OCT3, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA; ages 13–21: spectral-domain OCT, RTVue-100; Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA). Scans were along the horizontal and vertical meridians with the fovea at the center and were analyzed as published;14–16 co-localized rod and cone sensitivities were also measured and shown above the scans (Figure 2). At age 9, foveal anatomy appeared normal and, as previously documented (Figure 1), there was mainly cone function retained in and near the fovea. Outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness became reduced with increasing distance from the fovea and was not detectable between ~8° and 20°. At greater eccentricities, there was near normal lamination with both ONL and outer photoreceptor sublaminae becoming detectable. There was also normal rod but abnormal cone sensitivities. At age 11, there was ONL thinning and associated vision loss at the inferior retinal region that had detectable structure and function at age 9 (Figure 2B); superior retina was less affected, and least affected was the temporal retinal region (Figure 2A). At age 21, ONL was detectable only near the foveal center in a small island with cone-mediated function. Magnified images of the relatively preserved regions in superior retina illustrate a sequence of structural changes, particularly those distal to the ONL (Figures 2B, 2C). The signal originating from the rod outer segments (ROS) is clearly visible at age 9. Only two years later, there is ONL and ROS thinning. At ages 13 to 21, ONL is barely detectable and OS unmeasurable (Figure 2C). Serial ONL thickness data are plotted as a function of eccentricity (Figure 2A–C, lowest panels).
En face imaging was performed with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRA2 or Spectralis HRA; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) between ages 11 to 21 using near infrared (NIR) excitation lights in reflectance (REF) and reduced-illuminance autofluorescence imaging (RAFI) modes.17 At ages 11 and 13, there was a central elliptical region of relatively homogeneous high signal on NIR-RAFI (Figure 3A, main panels) and relatively low signal on NIR-REF (Figure 3A, insets). This pattern is thought to represent retained RPE melanization.18 Immediately surrounding this central region was a heterogeneous pattern of hyper- and hypoautofluorescence associated with increased visibility of choroidal vessels. The combination of increased NIR-REF signal and reduced NIR-RAFI signal intensity, and choroidal visibility is likely to be associated with either depigmentation or loss of RPE.18 At subsequent visits, there was a progressive constriction of the central elliptical region (Figure 3A). At age 21, a distinctly darker cresent had formed in the inferior parafovea as the region with brighter and homogeneous NIR-RAFI signal had become delimited only to the immediate foveal region. Wide-angle NIR-RAFI imaging was performed at two ages. Temporal to the macula, a region of relatively homogeneous high signal was apparent at age 11 (Figure 3B, arrows) but this feature was not visible by age 21.
DISCUSSION
Previous descriptions of the phenotype associated with SPATA7 mutations include a severe, childhood-onset disease in the category of LCA, with early loss of central vision, hyperopia, nystagmus, bull’s eye maculopathy, and progression to light perception,1,3–5 as well as juvenile-onset or even later-onset RP-like phenotypes.3,5,6,19 Syndromic forms of SPATA7-associated disease with extra-ocular manifestations have also been reported.5 In some patients with measurable ERGs, a CRD clinical diagnosis was made based on non-detectable cone ERGs and severely abnormal rod function.5 Serial functional and structural data in the patient reported here provides a rare glimpse of a transformation of a CRD phenotype into an RP phenotype. Our CRD diagnosis at presentation was based on the cone>rod dysfunction of the midperiphery (reflected in both perimetry and ERG); the surviving cone central island was an inconsistent feature at the time although it has been reported in some CRD patients.9 After the degeneration of the midperiphery, the central cones were the vestige of function that made the phenotype appear to be end-stage RP. Such an evolution has not been previously documented; more commonly, clinical experience is with evolution through stages of increasing disease severity within one pattern of retinal degeneration.13 Taken together with the reports of different phenotypes in SPATA7 genotypes, the present case of an evolving phenotype raises the larger question about how general or specific a gene screening search should be and whether a definitive clinical diagnosis should dictate a specific group of genetic tests. In other words, should a clinical diagnosis of CRD prompt a genetic testing exercise of currently known CRD genes, or should we test all known retinal genes? Currently, cost must also be factored into such decisions.7
Before the present era of emerging therapies for otherwise incurable genetic retinal degenerations, a discussion over speed and accuracy of clinical and molecular genetic diagnoses had little or no potential clinical or therapeutic impact. Sufficient understanding of the disease would be adequate to advise patient and family about prognosis, as well as inform them of the chances of further disease inheritance within the same generation or other generations. If there had been an opportunity to treat the condition at age 9 in our patient, however, there would have been far more retinal function and structure to treat.
A recent report of efficacy for subretinal gene therapy in the Spata7 knockout mouse is encouraging although the issue of long-term continuing retinal degeneration needs further research.20 A strategy for treating only the residual central island now at age 21 could represent a different challenge and intravitreal delivery of vector (or another therapy) may be more appropriate for remaining fragile central photoreceptors.16
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Supported in part by Hope for Vision, Foundation Fighting Blindness, Macula Vision Research Foundation, the Chatlos Foundation, Research to Prevent Blindness, and NEI/NIH (EY 013203). Also supported by the Canadian Foundation Fighting Blindness (FFB-Canada), the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR), Reseau Vision, the Fondation de Recherche en Sante du Quebec (FRSQ) and the Montreal Children’s Hospital Foundation (MCHF). Parental permission and assent, and then consent at the latest age examined were obtained. Procedures adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Institutional Review Board.
Footnotes
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
The authors report no conflict of interest and are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
References
- 1.Stockton DW, Lewis RA, Abboud EB, et al. A novel locus for Leber congenital amaurosis on chromosome 14q24. Hum Genet. 1998;103:328–333. doi: 10.1007/s004390050825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Eblimit A, Nguyen TM, Chen Y, et al. Spata7 is a retinal ciliopathy gene critical for correct RPGRIP1 localization and protein trafficking in the retina. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:1584–1601. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang H, den Hollander AI, Moayedi Y, et al. Mutations in SPATA7 cause Leber congenital amaurosis and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:380–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Perrault I, Hanein S, Gerard X, et al. Spectrum of SPATA7 mutations in Leber congenital amaurosis and delineation of the associated phenotype. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:E1241–1250. doi: 10.1002/humu.21203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mackay DS, Ocaka LA, Borman AD, et al. Screening of SPATA7 in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis and severe childhood-onset retinal dystrophy reveals disease-causing mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:3032–3038. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-7025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Avila-Fernández A, Cortón M, López-Molina MI, et al. Late onset retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2523–2524. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee K, Garg S. Navigating the current landscape of clinical genetic testing for inherited retinal dystrophies. Genet Med. 2015;17:245–252. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yagasaki K, Jacobson SG. Cone-rod dystrophy. Phenotypic diversity by retinal function testing. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:701–708. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010719034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Szlyk JP, Fishman GA, Alexander KR, et al. Clinical subtypes of cone-rod dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(6):781–788. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060069025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang X, Wang H, Sun V, et al. Comprehensive molecular diagnosis of 179 Leber congenital amaurosis and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa patients by targeted next generation sequencing. J Med Genet. 2013;50:674–688. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jacobson SG, Voigt WJ, Parel JM, et al. Automated light- and dark- adapted perimetry for evaluating retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:1604–1611. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33522-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Roman AJ, Schwartz SB, Aleman TS, et al. Quantifying rod photoreceptor-mediated vision in retinal degenerations: dark-adapted thresholds as outcome measures. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2004.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jacobson SG, Roman AJ, Aleman TS, et al. Normal central retinal function and structure preserved in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1079–1085. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huang Y, Cideciyan AV, Papastergiou GI, et al. Relation of optical coherence tomography to microanatomy in normal and rd chickens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2405–2416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aleman TS, Cideciyan AV, Sumaroka A, et al. Retinal laminar architecture in human retinitis pigmentosa caused by Rhodopsin gene mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1580–1590. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jacobson SG, Cideciyan AV, Huang WC, et al. TULP1 mutations causing early-onset retinal degeneration: preserved but insensitive macular cones. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:5354–5364. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cideciyan AV, Swider M, Aleman TS, et al. Reduced-illuminance autofluorescence imaging in ABCA4-associated retinal degenerations. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007;24:1457–1467. doi: 10.1364/josaa.24.001457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cideciyan AV, Swider M, Jacobson SG. Autofluorescence imaging with near-infrared excitation: normalization by reflectance to reduce signal from choroidal fluorophores. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:3393–3406. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kannabiran C, Palavalli L, Jalali S. Mutation of SPATA7 in a family with autosomal recessive early-onset retinitis pigmentosa. J Mol Genet Med. 2012;6:301–303. doi: 10.4172/1747-0862.1000053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhong H, Eblimit A, Moayedi Y, et al. AAV8(Y733F)-mediated gene therapy in Spata7 knockout mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis and retinitis pigmentosa. Gene Ther. 2015;22:619–627. doi: 10.1038/gt.2015.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.