Dear Editor,
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with tissue acquisition plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis of different diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent structures[1] and is known as well for its high accuracy and low complication rate.[2] Moreover, EUS-FNA has proven to be helpful in obtaining tissue samples from mediastinal lesions.[3,4] Different tricks to improve the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA have been proposed.[5]
Germ cell tumor (GCT) differs in frequency in children when compared to adults. Only a smaller proportion of GCTs are present in adults, showing different pathogenesis and features from prepubertal age. Teratoma is almost uniformly benign in children but generally malignant in the older patients.[6]
A 52-year-old man was admitted to our unit for suspicion of a mediastinal mass. At the age of 13 years he underwent orchiectomy plus retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for an embryonal carcinoma, and 7 years ago, thoracic and left sovraclavear lymphadenectomy for teratocarcinoma metastases, followed by chemotherapy.
In March 2015, a follow-up computed tomography (CT)-positron emission tomography (PET) diagnosed a nodular mass of about 3 cm, above the right atrium, closer to the esophageal wall, not confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which showed only an esophageal diverticulum with a partially solid tissue.
Mediastinal EUS evidenced, at the middle third of the esophagus inside the submucosal layers, a type-mixed, ovular-shaped lesion of 3 cm, with an anechoic area and a remnant solid ipoechoic tissue, close to the ascending aorta [Figure 1]. A 25-gauge FNA, with two passes, was performed with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) by a pathologist [Figure 2]. Cytology showed neoplastic cells [Figure 3]. The patient was then referred to surgery, and histology diagnosed a teratoma.
Figure 1.
EUS radial findings of the esophageal teratoma
Figure 2.
EUS-FNA of the esophageal teratoma
Figure 3.
Neoplastic cells revealed at cytopathology examination
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kim EY. Fine-needle biopsy: Should this be the first choice in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition? Clin Endosc. 2014;47:425–8. doi: 10.5946/ce.2014.47.5.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carrara S, Arcidiacono PG, Mezzi G, et al. Pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: Complication rate and clinical course in a single centre. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42:520–3. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jamil LH, Kashani A, Scimeca D, et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound distinguish between mediastinal benign lymph nodes and those involved by sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or metastasis? Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:2191–8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3164-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mehmood S, Loya A, Yusuf MA. Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of mediastinal and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy. Acta Cytol. 2013;57:436–42. doi: 10.1159/000351474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Savides TJ. Tricks for improving EUS-FNA accuracy and maximizing cellular yield. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(Suppl):S130–3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ulbright TM, Young RH. Testicular and paratesticular tumors and tumor-like lesions in the first 2 decades. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2014;31:323–81. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]