Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2016 Aug 19;7:1204. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01204

Gut Bifidobacteria Populations in Human Health and Aging

Silvia Arboleya 1,2, Claire Watkins 1,2,3, Catherine Stanton 1,2, R Paul Ross 1,2,4,*
PMCID: PMC4990546  PMID: 27594848

Abstract

The intestinal microbiota has increasingly been shown to have a vital role in various aspects of human health. Indeed, several studies have linked alterations in the gut microbiota with the development of different diseases. Among the vast gut bacterial community, Bifidobacterium is a genus which dominates the intestine of healthy breast-fed infants whereas in adulthood the levels are lower but relatively stable. The presence of different species of bifidobacteria changes with age, from childhood to old age. Bifidobacterium longum, B. breve, and B. bifidum are generally dominant in infants, whereas B. catenulatum, B. adolescentis and, as well as B. longum are more prevalent in adults. Increasingly, evidence is accumulating which shows beneficial effects of supplementation with bifidobacteria for the improvement of human health conditions ranging from protection against infection to different extra- and intra-intestinal positive effects. Moreover, bifidobacteria have been associated with the production of a number of potentially health promoting metabolites including short chain fatty acids, conjugated linoleic acid and bacteriocins. The aim of this mini-review is to describe the bifidobacteria compositional changes associated with different stages in life, highlighting their beneficial role, as well as their presence or absence in many disease states.

Keywords: bifidobacteria, intestinal microbiota, health, aging, probiotics

Introduction

The study of the intestinal microbiota, linked with its impact on human health, has become a transforming topic in microbiology research. From the pioneering studies using culture-dependent techniques to the current omics’ approach, composition and functionality of the intestinal microbiota has been assessed in a wide variety of studies (Lagier et al., 2015). The complex microbiota and the relationships it plays in the prevention and alleviation of diseases have been a major focus of many works (Turnbaugh et al., 2009; Qin et al., 2010; Karlsson et al., 2013). Members of the genus Bifidobacterium have been identified as almost ubiquitous inhabitants of the human host (Biavatti and Mattarelli, 2006), performing an important role in the gut from birth. Due to the traditional interest in bifidobacteria as probiotics this genus has been studied in depth, and changes in the species composition, diversity or relative abundance have been investigated at different stages of life and in several diseases. The aim of this mini-review is to describe the bifidobacteria compositional changes associated with different stages in life, highlighting their beneficial role, as well as the possible role of their presence in the protection against many disease states.

Intestinal Microbiota

The intestinal microbiota plays an important role in human health and has long been associated with such functions as metabolic, protective, and trophic (Guarner and Malagelada, 2003) and more recently functions related to the gut-brain axis or liver-gut axis (Clarke et al., 2014). The current exponential increase in sequencing and the explosion of other “omics” approaches has allowed us to gain a deep knowledge of intestinal microbiota.

The establishment of the intestinal microbiota was initially considered to occur at birth; however, the presence of microorganisms in placenta or amniotic fluid (Collado et al., 2016) suggests a primary fetal colonization. Moreover, the process is determined by different factors which undoubtedly have an effect on microbiota homeostasis (Penders et al., 2006; Faa et al., 2013). Actinobacteria, followed by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes are the main phyla in early childhood, characterized by low diversity and complexity (Koenig et al., 2011; Turroni et al., 2012). The main changes in gut microbiota composition take place in the first stages of life, getting to a relative stability at 1–2 years old (Voreades et al., 2014). The adult-like structure of the gut microbiota is thought to occur after the 3rd year of life (Koenig et al., 2011; Yatsunenko et al., 2012), and reaches a total number of 1014 microorganisms, comprising of bacteria, eukarya, viruses and archaeal members (Mihajlovski et al., 2010; HMP, 2012). At phylum level, the gut microbiota is made up of 80–90% Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. At species and strain taxonomic level, the diversity is very high in adult life, and is characterized by high interindividual variability (HMP, 2012). However, the functionality and metabolism of the gut microbiota is highly conserved (Qin et al., 2010). Aging was defined by Imahori (1992) as “the regression of physiological function accompanied by advancement of age.” It is a natural process which entails changes in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), immunosenescence and, in some cases, malnutrition (Woodmansey, 2007; Biagi et al., 2012). In addition, alterations in lifestyle, diet and medication have an unavoidable effect on the elderly microbiota composition and function (Biagi et al., 2012; Claesson et al., 2012). Microbial diversity is reduced in old age; however, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes still constitute the dominant phyla, with increases in the relative abundance of some other Phyla – most notably Proteobacteria (Biagi et al., 2012; Odamaki et al., 2016).

Bifidobacteria And Their Relevance: From The Infant-Type To The Aged-Type Microbiota

Bifidobacteria are normal inhabitants of the GIT belonging to the Actinobacteria phylum. After the depletion of oxygen by facultative anaerobes, bifidobacterial populations are the most abundant genus present in the healthy infant gut (Favier et al., 2002). During adulthood the levels decrease considerably but remain relatively stable; decreasing again in old age (Odamaki et al., 2016; Figure 1). Certain strains of Bifidobacterium are widely used as probiotics – the safety of which is supported by the long historical consumption in fermented milks and the growing knowledge about their physiology and genomes (Arboleya et al., 2016; O’Callaghan and van Sinderen, 2016). The genus Bifidobacterium has been shown to play an important role in the barrier effect, the stimulation of immune system, being associated with a range of beneficial health effects (Picard et al., 2005).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

At birth levels of bifidobacteria are found to be at their highest. In cases of natural childbirth the numbers are highest at birth. In contrast, they are lower in C sectioned babies. Various diseases such as obesity, diabetes and allergies have been associated with lower numbers of bifidobacteria at various stages of life. When weaned onto solid foods diet is more of an intervening factor and an adult-like (stable) microbiota develops. In this figure the authors hypothesize with regard to the relative abundance of bifidobacteria present at each stage of the life cycle, based on the literature cited in the following review by Voreades et al. (2014).

Early Stages of Life

The initial colonization by bifidobacteria is dependent on a number of extrinsic factors. In terms of vertical transfer, many studies have linked the transmission of bifidobacteria from the mother’s vaginal tract, GIT, breast milk, placenta and amniotic fluid to the infant (Makino et al., 2013; Collado et al., 2016). Birth mode, in particular, has a significant impact on this initial colonization, with an increased abundance of bifidobacteria found in infants born vaginally, versus those born by cesarean section (Dominguez-Bello et al., 2010).

Gestational age has been described in terms of its impact on the infant gut, whereby pre-term infants have been characterized in many studies by a dominance of Proteobacteria, with increases in members of Clostridium and Staphylococcus, and much lower levels of Actinobacteria. In contrast, the full-term infant gut has been correlated with much higher levels of Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides, which tend to be dominant in the early weeks of life (Arboleya et al., 2012; Barrett et al., 2013; Arboleya et al., 2015).

Numerous studies investigating the effects of breast feeding versus formula feeding have identified specific bifidobacterial species that correlate with the feeding regime (Roger et al., 2010). Using both culture-dependent and molecular methods, studies have found that Bifidobacterium breve, B. bifidum, B. longum ssp. longum, and B. longum spp. infantis are present in both breast- and formula-fed infants (Mevissen-Verhage et al., 1987; Klaassens et al., 2009). However, B. longum ssp. infantis is more commonly associated with breast fed infants, whereas B. longum ssp. longum has been found more commonly amongst bottle-fed infants (Guaraldi and Salvatori, 2012). B. adolescentis, which is commonly found in adults, was found to be present only in formula-fed babies (Klaassens et al., 2009). Numerous studies have focused on the bifidogenic effect that human breast milk has on the infant gut microbiota (Musilova et al., 2014). Specific glycans found within breast milk are known to be utilized by bifidobacteria; however, it has been shown that breast milk provided by mothers with an inactive allele of the Fucosyltransferase 2 gene (FUT2), an enzyme involved in the transfer of fucose to glycans, delays the establishment of bifidobacteria in the infant (Lewis et al., 2015). Similarly, bifidobacteria provide an important role in the breakdown of human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs; Garrido et al., 2013), creating a clear evolutionary link between the mother, infant and the microbial species present. Indeed, B. longum ssp. infantis has specifically been studied for its ability to digest different HMO structures (Sela et al., 2008). This species is also associated with anti-inflammatory properties, and the ability to decrease intestinal permeability (Underwood et al., 2015). The growth of infant-derived Bifidobacterium, B. longum ssp. infantis, and B. bifidum, in the presence of HMOs has also been shown to promote the adhesive properties of these strains, as well as the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines and tight junction proteins in eukaryotic cells (Chichlowski et al., 2012). Interestingly, a study published by Del Chierico et al. (2015) focused on the co-correlation between the metabolome and the OTUs occurrence in infant stool samples. Results found that Bifidobacterium OTUs were positively correlated with the presence of lactate and alanine during this 1st month of life. Another recent work, negatively correlated the lactase gene with Bifidobacterium levels in the gut microbiota of twins, speculating that lactase-persisters babies harbor lower levels of bifidobacteria because of low lactose availability (Goodrich et al., 2016).

In terms of species, B. longum, B. breve, and B. bifidum are most abundant (Table 1) in infants (Favier et al., 2002; Gueimonde et al., 2007; Turroni et al., 2012). A recent study described the different Bifidobacterium species profile between monozygotic twins (entirely dominated by B. breve) and their fraternal sibling (exhibiting higher species diversity) at 1 month of life (Murphy et al., 2015; Table 1).

Table 1.

(A) Distribution of the most abundant Bifidobacterium species in the intestinal microbiota at different stages of life analyzed using different techniques.

(A) Human population Bifidobacterium spp. Techniques Reference
Infants
Breast-fed, 22–24 days of age B. brevea
B. longum ssp. longum, B. longum ssp. infantisb
PCR Matsuki et al., 1999
Breast- and Formula fed, 28–90 days of age B. longum ssp. infantis
B. breve, B. longum ssp. longum
PCR Haarman and Knol, 2005
Breast-fed, 1 month of age B. longum
B. bifidum, B. animalis, B. breve
PCR Grönlund et al., 2007
Breast-fed, 3–6 weeks of age B. breve
B. longum ssp. longum, B. longum ssp. infantis
PCR Mikami et al., 2009
Full-term, 1 month of age B. longum q-PCR Grzeskowiak et al., 2015
Preterm, CS, 1 month of age B. longum, B. lactis
Preterm, Vaginal, 1 month of age B. longum, B. bifidum
Twins, 1 month of age B. breve 16S Metagenomics Murphy et al., 2015
Fraternal infant, 1 month of age B. breve, B. longum
B. dentium, B. adolescentis
Adults
23–54 years old, Japanese B. catenulatum,
B. longum, B. adolescentis
PCR Matsuki et al., 1999
25–59 years old, Japanese B. longum,
B. adolescentis, B. catenulatum
q-PCR Matsuki et al., 2004
≤57 years old, Russian B. adolescentis MALDI-TOF Chaplin et al., 2015
20–40 years old, Finnish B. longum,
B. catenulatum
q-PCR Gueimonde et al., 2007
18–39 years old, lean subjects (BMI = 19.83 ± 0.94 kg/m2) B. longum q-PCR Mayorga Reyes et al., 2016
Elderly
69–89 years old, French B. adolescentis
B. longum
DNA–DNA hybridization Gavini et al., 2001
67–75 years old, Scottish B. angulatum
B. longum
Culture-based analyses Woodmansey et al., 2004
>70 years old, Finish B. catenulatum
B. longum, B. bifidum
q-PCR Gueimonde et al., 2007
77–95 years old, Spanish B. longum
B. bifidum, B. pseudocatenulatum
q-PCR Salazar et al., 2013
Centenaries
100–104 years old, Italian B. longum
B. adolescentis, B. bifidum
Culture-based analyses Drago et al., 2012
80–108 years old, Chinese B. dentium
B. longum
q-PCR Wang et al., 2015
(B) Disease in human population Bifidobacterium spp. Techniques Reference
Infants
Allergic mothers B. adolescentis q-PCR Grönlund et al., 2007
Coeliac disease (Non-active) B. longum;B. dentium q-PCR Collado et al., 2008a
Celiac disease B. longum q-PCR Palma et al., 2012
Allergic diseases B. longum
B. pseudocatenulatum, B. catenulatum
Culture-based analyses Akay et al., 2014
Adults
Allergy B. adolescentis PCR-DGGE Stsepetova et al., 2007
IBS B. catenulatum q-PCR Kerckhoffs et al., 2009
IBS B. catenulatum/pseudocatenulatum q-PCR Lyra et al., 2009
IBS B. pseudocatenulatum, B. gallicum HITChip phylogenetic microarray Rajilic-Stojanovic et al., 2009
IBS B. adolescentis 16S Metagenomics Jeffery et al., 2012
Hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis B. dentium
B. catenulatum, B. longum
PCR-DGGE and q-PCR Xu et al., 2012
Obesity B. animalis q-PCR Million et al., 2013
Cystic fibrosis B. catenulatum/pseudocatenulatum, B. longum, B. adolescentis PCR-DGGE Duytschaever et al., 2013
Long-term asthma B. adolescentis 16S Metagenomics Hevia et al., 2016

First row indicates the most abundant species founda. Second row indicates other abundant species foundb. (B) Studies focusing on Bifidobacterium species altered in certain diseases.

Increased levels; ↓ Decreased levels.

Adulthood and Old Age

In adulthood, the levels of bifidobacteria are lower (2–14% relative abundance) but remain stable (Odamaki et al., 2016). Gueimonde et al. (2007) identified significantly higher levels of Bifidobacterium in infants than in adults by q-PCR technique. They postulated that B. longum is the most widely abundant species, which is in agreement with other studies (Gavini et al., 2001; Matsuki et al., 2004). However, Matsuki et al. (2004) observed higher levels of B. adolescentis and B. catenulatum in their adult population. Chaplin et al. (2015) reported a decreased frequency of isolation of B. bifidum and B. breve with age and an increased trend in B. adolescentis.

Currently, there is no agreed definition of old-age-specific gut microbiota profile due to the high inter-individual variability, differences in diet and lifestyle, and the unclear definition of the term “elderly.” However, some trends are repetitively observed such as the decrease of bifidobacteria in the elderly population, confirmed by several studies using different technologies (Mitsuoka et al., 1974; Mitsuoka, 1992; Gavini et al., 2001; Hopkins et al., 2001; Gueimonde et al., 2010; Biagi et al., 2012; Salazar et al., 2013). Woodmansey et al. (2004) reported that the decline in bifidobacteria population with aging was accompanied by a decrease in species diversity. This decline was associated with the reduction in adhesion to the intestinal mucosa, but it is not clear if it is due to the changes in the microbiota or in the structure of mucus (He et al., 2001).

The bifidobacteria composition in centenary populations was also reported in some studies; however, the results remain somewhat controversial. In a European population, the microbiota composition of centenarians was still similar to that of adults (Biagi et al., 2010), however, higher proportions of bifidobacteria were found in centenarians than in younger elderlies from a region of China (Zhao et al., 2011). Regarding species (Table 1), B. longum was the most abundant in Italian centenarians followed by B. adolescentis and B. bifidum (Drago et al., 2012), but B. dentium was dominant in Chinese centenaries (Wang et al., 2015).

Other extrinsic factors indirectly related to the aging process also affect the bifidobacteria composition. The extended use of antibiotics in the older population undoubtedly has a huge impact on the intestinal microbiota composition, decreasing the bifidobacteria population (Woodmansey et al., 2004; O’Sullivan et al., 2013). While antibiotics remain an essential medical tool, therapies targeted toward the reestablishment of microbiota have been explored, in particular the use of probiotics to correct the imbalance in the bifidobacteria population and the alteration in the intestinal microbiota after antibiotic therapy (Rondanelli et al., 2015). In terms of frailty, van Tongeren et al. (2005) did not find differences in bifidobacteria between elderly people divided into a low and high frailty category. The same trend was observed by Bartosch et al. (2004) between elderly living in the local community and elderly in a hospitalized environment.

Bifidobacteria And Diseases

Several diseases, both intra- and extra-intestinal, have been associated with alterations in the gut microbiota composition and function (Wu and Lewis, 2013). Although, there is still not a detailed description of “potential alterated-microbiota types,” some authors postulate that intestinal microbial alterations could be the prelude to a wide range of disease (Putignani et al., 2014).

Bifidobacterial Composition in Diseases

Given the widespread use of bifidobacteria as probiotics, they have been studied extensively and as such the aberrancies in bifidobacteria species composition, diversity or changes in their relative abundance have been reported in several diseases.

Obesity is a worldwide disease affecting children and adults, which is commonly associated with alterations in the microbiota. Some studies have shown lower levels of bifidobacteria, linked to higher prevalence of enterobacteria or Staphylococcus in obese children (Kalliomäki et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2015). Interestingly, women who gain weight during pregnancy have displayed lower levels of Bifidobacterium in contrast to healthy weight pregnant women (8.36 vs. 9.10 log genome equivalents/g feces; Santacruz et al., 2010). These results are correlated with the decreased levels of bifidobacteria in babies whose mother gained significant weight during pregnancy (Collado et al., 2008b), that is over and above the pregnancy itself. In terms of allergic disease, Hevia et al. (2016) observed lower levels of Bifidobacterium in patients with long-term asthma. The same study showed a dominance of B. adolescentis in both short- and long-term asthmatic individuals, in concordance with other previous studies (Stsepetova et al., 2007). This species was only found in infants of allergic mothers, who displayed lower levels of bifidobacteria in their breast milk (Grönlund et al., 2007). One particular Turkish study described a statistical difference between the increased levels of B. longum in healthy children (30.3%) when compared to children with allergic disease (11.1%), suggesting that B. longum may play a beneficial role in the disease and thus may be useful as a probiotic for the prevention of allergic pathologies (Akay et al., 2014). Different studies have focused on the relationship between the intestinal microbiota and the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), showing an altered microbiota related to IBS patients and lower levels in the Bifidobacterium genus (Taverniti and Guglielmetti, 2014).

In the elderly gut microbiota, Hopkins and Macfarlane (2002) focused on the impact of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, describing a reduction in numbers of bifidobacteria in elderly people suffering the infection compared to a healthy control group. Decreased numbers of bifidobacteria have also been observed in other illnesses such as cystic fibrosis, hepatitis B and both diabetes Types I and II (Wu et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2012; Duytschaever et al., 2013; Murri et al., 2013).

Overall, there is a repetitive trend between lower bifidobacteria and a variety of common disease states, suggesting a role of bifidobacteria in health. However, whether bifidobacteria numbers have any causal relationship to any of these conditions remains unknown.

Bifidobacteria as Probiotics in Diseases

Numerous health-promoting effects have been ascribed to strains of the Bifidobacterium genus based on their use as probiotics in intervention strategies to address many ill health conditions.

In that regard, the capability of bifidobacteria to stimulate the immune system seems to be species specific as shown in a particular study where the effect of infant derived bifidobacteria on the T-helper 1(TH1)/TH2 balance was examined. Results published by Ménard et al. (2008) demonstrated that B. bifidum, B. dentium, and B. longum were capable of stimulating systemic and intestinal immunity. It is not surprising that bifidobacteria are so widely used as probiotics in the treatment and prevention of infant disease given their dominance in the infant gut. Their application in pathologies such as allergies, celiac disease, obesity, diarrheas, colic, infections or necrotizing enterocolitis has returned very good results (Di Gioia et al., 2014). They have also been extensively used in adults and elderly, in the treatment of gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases (Biagi et al., 2012; Malaguarnera et al., 2012; Tojo et al., 2014). In an attempt to restore the lipoprotein imbalance found in the blood of children with dyslipidemia, Guardamagna et al. (2014) examined the effects of a probiotic which contained three Bifidobacterium strains, selected due to their bile salt hydrolase activity. Their results found a decrease in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

In terms of brain gut disorders, several studies have examined the use of bifidobacteria for their psychobiotic effects in reducing stress, anxiety and depressive like behavior in BALB/c mice. It was concluded that the behavioral effects observed may be partially explained by the differential effects on the immune system, although mechanisms underlying the effects are unknown (Savignac et al., 2014). Furthermore, a particular strain of B. longum was shown to have anxiolytic effects in a model of non-infectious colitis through vagal pathways whereby the fermentation products of this species were capable of modifying the excitation of enteric neurons in the gut (Bercik et al., 2011).

Bifidobacteria have also been studied for their ability to specifically localize at tumor sites (Nakamura et al., 2002). Cronin et al. (2010) showed in that B. breve UCC 2003 was able to target tumors in athymic MF1 nu/nu mice bearing s.c. B16-F10 murine melanoma tumors, as well as C57 mice bearing s.c. Lewis lung carcinoma tumors. Interestingly, an increasing bacterial load of B. breve UCC 2003 was found in the metastatic nodules in the lungs of the B-16 mouse model where oxygen is transferred. Bifidobacteria have also been shown to have an effect on tumor specific T-cell responses in C57BL/6 mice bearing s.c. B16.SIY melanoma growth (Sivan et al., 2015). In this study bifidobacteria were found to have an effect on dendritic cell function and CD8+ T cell responses, reducing tumor cell growth.

Bifidobacterium species may have positive effects on human health, while it should be stressed that the increase only in fecal bifidobacteria level cannot in itself a health benefit. However, given the strong association of bifidobacteria to health it may provide a contributory biomarker to disease status lined to some illnesses in the future. Moreover the use of bifidobacteria as delivery vehicles for the administration of therapeutic agents to target tumors due to their anaerobic nature, is a very promising and safe form of therapy for this disease state.

Conclusion

Bifidobacteria are one of the most abundant genera present in the healthy infant gut and represent a significant portion of the microbiota throughout a healthy adult life, playing an important role in gut homeostasis and health. During late adulthood and within several diseases, the levels of Bifidobacterium and its species diversity decrease. Nowadays, their association with health and aging is undeniable, however, the jury is still out on whether it is a “cause” or “effect” type relationship. Given the prevalence of bifidobacteria at various stages of a healthy life and the many health promoting attributes associated with their use, it is undoubted that these bacteria play an important role in human health maintenance and protection and also may in the future provide a very important biomarker for certain diseases.

Author Contributions

RR, CS, and SA conceived the manuscript. SA and CW drafted the manuscript. CS and RR reviewed the final version of the manuscript. All the authors approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)-funded APC Microbiome Institute; by Department of Agriculture Food and Marine (DAFM)-funded INFANTMET (Ref. No. 10FDairy) and ToddlerFood (Ref. No. 14F821) projects; and by European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (EUFP7)-funded MyNewGut project (Ref. No. 613979).

References

  1. Akay H. K., Bahar Tokman H., Hatipoglu N., Hatipoglu H., Siraneci R., Demirci M., et al. (2014). The relationship between bifidobacteria and allergic asthma and/or allergic dermatitis: a prospective study of 0–3 years-old children in Turkey. Anaerobe 28 98–103. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arboleya S., Binetti A., Salazar N., Fernandez N., Solis G., Hernandez-Barranco A., et al. (2012). Establishment and development of intestinal microbiota in preterm neonates. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 79 763–772. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01261.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arboleya S., Sánchez B., Milani C., Duranti S., Solís G., Fernández N., et al. (2015). Intestinal microbiota development in preterm neonates and effect of perinatal antibiotics. J. Pediatr. 166 538–544. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.09.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arboleya S., Stanton C., Ryan C. A., Dempsey E., Ross P. R. (2016). Bosom Buddies: the symbiotic relationship between infants and Bifidobacterium longum ssp. longum and ssp. infantis. Genetic and probiotic features. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 7 1–21. 10.1146/annurev-food-041715-033151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barrett E., Kerr C., Murphy K., O’Sullivan O., Ryan C. A., Dempsey E. M., et al. (2013). The individual-specific and diverse nature of the preterm infant microbiota. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 98 F334–F340. 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartosch S., Fite A., Macfarlane G. T., McMurdo M. E. T. (2004). Characterization of bacterial communities in feces from healthy elderly volunteers and hospitalized elderly patients by using real-time PCR and effects of antibiotic treatment on the fecal microbiota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70 3575–3581. 10.1128/AEM.70.6.3575-3581.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bercik P., Park A. J., Sinclair D., Khoshdel A., Lu J., Huang X., et al. (2011). The anxiolytic effect of Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 involves vagal pathways for gut-brain communication. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 23 1132–1139. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01796.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Biagi E., Candela M., Fairweather-Tait S., Franceschi C., Brigidi P. (2012). Ageing of the human metaorganism: the microbial counterpart. Age 34 247–267. 10.1007/s11357-011-9217-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Biagi E., Nylund L., Candela M., Ostan R., Bucci L., Pini E., et al. (2010). Through ageing and beyond: gut microbiota and inflammatory status in seniors and centenarians. PLoS ONE 5:e10667 10.1371/journal.pone.0010667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Biavatti B., Mattarelli P. (2006). “The family Bifidobacteriaceae,” in The Prokaryotes, 3rd Edn Vol. 3 eds Falkow S., Rosenberg E., Schleifir K. H., Stackebrandt E., Dworkin M. (New York, NY: Springer – Verlag GmbH; ), 322–382. 10.1007/0-387-30743-5_17 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chaplin A. V., Brzhozovskii A. G., Parfenova T. V., Kafarskaia L. I., Volodin N. N., Shkoporov A. N., et al. (2015). Species diversity of bifidobacteria in the intestinal microbiota studied using MALDI-TOF mass-spectrometry. Vestn. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk 4 435–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chichlowski M., De Lartigue G., German J. B., Raybould H. E., Mills D. A. (2012). Bifidobacteria isolated from infants and cultured on human milk oligosaccharides affect intestinal epithelial function. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 55 321–327. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31824fb899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Claesson M. J., Jeffery I. B., Conde S., Power S. E., O’Connor E. M., Cusack S., et al. (2012). Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature 488 178–184. 10.1038/nature11319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clarke G., Stilling R. M., Kennedy P. J., Stanton C., Cryan J. F., Dinan T. G. (2014). Minireview: gut microbiota: the neglected endocrine organ. Mol. Endocrinol. 28 1221–1238. 10.1210/me.2014-1108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Collado M. C., Donat E., Ribes-Koninckx C., Calabuig M., Sanz Y. (2008a). Imbalances in faecal and duodenal Bifidobacterium species composition in active and non-active coeliac disease. BMC Microbiol. 8:232 10.1186/1471-2180-8-232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Collado M. C., Isolauri E., Laitinen K., Salminen S. (2008b). Distinct composition of gut microbiota during pregnancy in overweight and normal-weight women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 88 894–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Collado M. C., Rautava S., Aakko J., Isolauri E., Salminen S. (2016). Human gut colonisation may be initiated in utero by distinct microbial communities in the placenta and amniotic fluid. Sci. Rep. 6 23129 10.1038/srep23129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cronin M., Morrissey D., Rajendran S., El Mashad S. M., van Sinderen D., O’Sullivan G. C., et al. (2010). Orally administered bifidobacteria as vehicles for delivery of agents to systemic tumors. Mol. Ther. 18 1397–1407. 10.1038/mt.2010.59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Del Chierico F., Vernocchi P., Petrucca A., Paci P., Fuentes S., Pratico G., et al. (2015). Phylogenetic and metabolic tracking of gut microbiota during perinatal development. PLoS ONE 10:e0137347 10.1371/journal.pone.0137347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Di Gioia D., Aloisio I., Mazzola G., Biavati B. (2014). Bifidobacteria: their impact on gut microbiota composition and their applications as probiotics in infants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98 563–577. 10.1007/s00253-013-5405-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dominguez-Bello M. G., Costello E. K., Contreras M., Magris M., Hidalgo G., Fierer N., et al. (2010). Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 11971–11975. 10.1073/pnas.1002601107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Drago L., Toscano M., Rodighiero V., De Vecchi E., Mogna G. (2012). Cultivable and pyrosequenced fecal microflora in centenarians and young subjects. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 46(Suppl.), S81–S84. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182693982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Duytschaever G., Huys G., Bekaert M., Boulanger L., De Boeck K., Vandamme P. (2013). Dysbiosis of bifidobacteria and Clostridium cluster XIVa in the cystic fibrosis fecal microbiota. J. Cyst. Fibros. 12 206–215. 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Faa G., Gerosa C., Fanni D., Nemolato S., van Eyken P., Fanos V. (2013). Factors influencing the development of a personal tailored microbiota in the neonate, with particular emphasis on antibiotic therapy. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 26(Suppl. 2), 35–43. 10.3109/14767058.2013.829700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Favier C. F., Vaughan E. E., De Vos W. M., Akkermans A. D. (2002). Molecular monitoring of succession of bacterial communities in human neonates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 219–226. 10.1128/AEM.68.1.219-226.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gao X., Jia R., Xie L., Kuang L., Feng L., Wan C. (2015). Obesity in school-aged children and its correlation with gut E. coli and Bifidobacteria: a case-control study. BMC Pediatr. 15:64 10.1186/s12887-015-0384-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Garrido D., Dallas D. C., Mills D. A. (2013). Consumption of human milk glycoconjugates by infant-associated bifidobacteria: mechanisms and implications. Microbiology 159(Pt 4), 649–664. 10.1099/mic.0.064113-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gavini F., Cayuela C., Antoine J.-M., Lecoq C., Lefebvre B., Membré J.-M., et al. (2001). Differences in the distribution of bifidobacterial and enterobacterial species in human faecal microflora of three different (children, adults, elderly) age groups. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 13 40–45. 10.1080/089106001750071690 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Goodrich J. K., Davenport E. R., Beaumont M., Jackson M. A., Knight R., Ober C., et al. (2016). Genetic determinants of the gut microbiome in UK twins. Cell Host Microbe 19 731–743. 10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Grönlund M. M., Gueimonde M., Laitinen K., Kociubinski G., Gronroos T., Salminen S., et al. (2007). Maternal breast-milk and intestinal bifidobacteria guide the compositional development of the Bifidobacterium microbiota in infants at risk of allergic disease. Clin. Exp. Allergy 37 1764–1772. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02849.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Grzeskowiak L., Sales Teixeira T. F., Bigonha S. M., Lobo G., Salminen S., Ferreira C. L. (2015). Gut Bifidobacterium microbiota in one-month-old Brazilian newborns. Anaerobe 35(Pt B), 54–58. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Guaraldi F., Salvatori G. (2012). Effect of breast and formula feeding on gut microbiota shaping in newborns. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2:94 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Guardamagna O., Amaretti A., Puddu P. E., Raimondi S., Abello F., Cagliero P., et al. (2014). Bifidobacteria supplementation: effects on plasma lipid profiles in dyslipidemic children. Nutrition 30 831–836. 10.1016/j.nut.2014.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guarner F., Malagelada J. R. (2003). Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet 361 512–519. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12489-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gueimonde M., Debor L., Tölkkö S., Jokisalo E., Salminen S. (2007). Quantitative assessment of faecal bifidobacterial populations by real-time PCR using lanthanide probes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102 1116–1122. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03145.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gueimonde M., Ouwehand A., Pitkälä K., Strandberg T., Finne-Soveri H., Salminen S. (2010). Fecal Bifidobacterium levels in elderly nursing home patients – Are levels as expected? Biosci. Microflora 29 111–113. 10.12938/bifidus.29.111 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Haarman M., Knol J. (2005). Quantitative real-time PCR assays to identify and quantify fecal Bifidobacterium species in infants receiving a prebiotic infant formula. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71 2318–2324. 10.1128/aem.71.5.2318-2324.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. He F., Ouwehand A. C., Isolauri E., Hosoda M., Benno Y., Salminen S. (2001). Differences in composition and mucosal adhesion of bifidobacteria isolated from healthy adults and healthy seniors. Curr. Microbiol. 43 351–354. 10.1007/s002840010315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hevia A., Milani C., Lopez P., Donado C. D., Cuervo A., Gonzalez S., et al. (2016). Allergic patients with long-term asthma display low levels of Bifidobacterium adolescentis. PLoS ONE 11:e0147809 10.1371/journal.pone.0147809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. HMP (2012). Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486 207–214. 10.1038/nature11234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hopkins M., Sharp R., Macfarlane G. (2001). Age and disease related changes in intestinal bacterial populations assessed by cell culture, 16S rRNA abundance, and community cellular fatty acid profiles. Gut 48 198–205. 10.1136/gut.48.2.198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hopkins M. J., Macfarlane G. T. (2002). Changes in predominant bacterial populations in human faeces with age and with Clostridium difficile infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 51 448–454. 10.1099/0022-1317-51-5-448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Imahori K. (1992). How I understand aging. Nutr. Rev. 50 351–352. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1992.tb02477.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jeffery I. B., O’Toole P. W., Ohman L., Claesson M. J., Deane J., Quigley E. M., et al. (2012). An irritable bowel syndrome subtype defined by species-specific alterations in faecal microbiota. Gut 61 997–1006. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kalliomäki M., Collado M. C., Salminen S., Isolauri E. (2008). Early differences in fecal microbiota composition in children may predict overweight. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 87 534–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Karlsson F. H., Tremaroli V., Nookaew I., Bergstrom G., Behre C. J., Fagerberg B., et al. (2013). Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature 498 99–103. 10.1038/nature12198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kerckhoffs A. P., Samsom M., van der Rest M. E., de Vogel J., Knol J., Ben-Amor K., et al. (2009). Lower Bifidobacteria counts in both duodenal mucosa-associated and fecal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome patients. World J. Gastroenterol. 15 2887–2892. 10.3748/wjg.15.2887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Klaassens E. S., Boesten R. J., Haarman M., Knol J., Schuren F. H., Vaughan E. E., et al. (2009). Mixed-species genomic microarray analysis of fecal samples reveals differential transcriptional responses of bifidobacteria in breast- and formula-fed infants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75 2668–2676. 10.1128/AEM.02492-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Koenig J. E., Spor A., Scalfone N., Fricker A. D., Stombaugh J., Knight R., et al. (2011). Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108(Suppl. 1), 4578–4585. 10.1073/pnas.1000081107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lagier J. C., Hugon P., Khelaifia S., Fournier P. E., La Scola B., Raoult D. (2015). The rebirth of culture in microbiology through the example of culturomics to study human gut microbiota. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 28 237–264. 10.1128/cmr.00014-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lewis Z. T., Totten S. M., Smilowitz J. T., Popovic M., Parker E., Lemay D. G., et al. (2015). Maternal fucosyltransferase 2 status affects the gut bifidobacterial communities of breastfed infants. Microbiome 3 13 10.1186/s40168-015-0071-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lyra A., Rinttila T., Nikkila J., Krogius-Kurikka L., Kajander K., Malinen E., et al. (2009). Diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome distinguishable by 16S rRNA gene phylotype quantification. World J. Gastroenterol. 15 5936–5945. 10.3748/wjg.15.5936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Makino H., Kushiro A., Ishikawa E., Kubota H., Gawad A., Sakai T., et al. (2013). Mother-to-infant transmission of intestinal bifidobacterial strains has an impact on the early development of vaginally delivered infant’s microbiota. PLoS ONE 8:e78331 10.1371/journal.pone.0078331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Malaguarnera G., Leggio F., Vacante M., Motta M., Giordano M., Bondi A., et al. (2012). Probiotics in the gastrointestinal diseases of the elderly. J. Nutr. Health Aging 16 402–410. 10.1007/s12603-011-0357-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Matsuki T., Watanabe K., Fujimoto J., Kado Y., Takada T., Matsumoto K., et al. (2004). Quantitative PCR with 16S rRNA-gene-targeted species-specific primers for analysis of human intestinal bifidobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70 167–173. 10.1128/AEM.70.1.167-173.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Matsuki T., Watanabe K., Tanaka R., Fukuda M., Oyaizu H. (1999). Distribution of bifidobacterial species in human intestinal microflora examined with 16S rRNA-gene-targeted species-specific primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65 4506–4512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mayorga Reyes L., Gonzalez Vazquez R., Cruz Arroyo S. M., Melendez Avalos A., Reyes Castillo P. A., Chavaro Perez D. A., et al. (2016). Correlation between diet and gut bacteria in a population of young adults. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 67 470–478. 10.3109/09637486.2016.1162770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ménard O., Butel M. J., Gaboriau-Routhiau V., Waligora-Dupriet A. J. (2008). Gnotobiotic mouse immune response induced by Bifidobacterium sp. strains isolated from infants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74 660–666. 10.1128/aem.01261-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mevissen-Verhage E. A., Marcelis J. H., de Vos M. N., Harmsen-van Amerongen W. C., Verhoef J. (1987). Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, and Clostridium spp. in fecal samples from breast-fed and bottle-fed infants with and without iron supplement. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25 285–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mihajlovski A., Doré J., Levenez F., Alric M., Brugère J.-F. (2010). Molecular evaluation of the human gut methanogenic archaeal microbiota reveals an age-associated increase of the diversity. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2 272–280. 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00116.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Mikami K., Takahashi H., Kimura M., Isozaki M., Izuchi K., Shibata R., et al. (2009). Influence of maternal bifidobacteria on the establishment of bifidobacteria colonizing the gut in infants. Pediatr. Res. 65 669–674. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819ed7a8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Million M., Angelakis E., Maraninchi M., Henry M., Giorgi R., Valero R., et al. (2013). Correlation between body mass index and gut concentrations of Lactobacillus reuteri, Bifidobacterium animalis, Methanobrevibacter smithii and Escherichia coli. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 37 1460–1466. 10.1038/ijo.2013.20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  63. Mitsuoka T. (1992). Intestinal flora and aging. Nutr. Rev. 50 438–446. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1992.tb02499.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Mitsuoka T., Hayakawa K., Kimura N. (1974). [The faecal flora of man. II. The composition of Bifidobacterium flora of different age groups (author’s transl)]. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Orig. A 226 469–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Murphy K., O’ Shea C. A., Ryan C. A., Dempsey E. M., O’ Toole P. W., Stanton C., et al. (2015). The gut microbiota composition in dichorionic triplet sets suggests a role for host genetic factors. PLoS ONE 10:e0122561 10.1371/journal.pone.0122561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Murri M., Leiva I., Gomez-Zumaquero J. M., Tinahones F. J., Cardona F., Soriguer F., et al. (2013). Gut microbiota in children with type 1 diabetes differs from that in healthy children: a case-control study. BMC Med. 11:46 10.1186/1741-7015-11-46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Musilova S., Rada V., Vlkova E., Bunesova V. (2014). Beneficial effects of human milk oligosaccharides on gut microbiota. Benef. Microbes 5 273–283. 10.3920/bm2013.0080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nakamura T., Sasaki T., Fujimori M., Yazawa K., Kano Y., Amano J., et al. (2002). Cloned cytosine deaminase gene expression of Bifidobacterium longum and application to enzyme/pro-drug therapy of hypoxic solid tumors. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 66 2362–2366. 10.1271/bbb.66.2362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. O’Callaghan A., van Sinderen D. (2016). Bifidobacteria and their role as members of the human gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 7:925 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Odamaki T., Kato K., Sugahara H., Hashikura N., Takahashi S., Xiao J. Z., et al. (2016). Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 16:90 10.1186/s12866-016-0708-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. O’Sullivan O., Coakley M., Lakshminarayanan B., Conde S., Claesson M. J., Cusack S., et al. (2013). Alterations in intestinal microbiota of elderly Irish subjects post-antibiotic therapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68 214–221. 10.1093/jac/dks348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Palma G. D., Capilla A., Nova E., Castillejo G., Varea V., Pozo T., et al. (2012). Influence of milk-feeding type and genetic risk of developing coeliac disease on intestinal microbiota of infants: the PROFICEL study. PLoS ONE 7:e30791 10.1371/journal.pone.0030791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Penders J., Thijs C., Vink C., Stelma F. F., Snijders B., Kummeling I., et al. (2006). Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy. Pediatrics 118 511–521. 10.1542/peds.2005-2824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Picard C., Fioramonti J., Francois A., Robinson T., Neant F., Matuchansky C. (2005). Review article: bifidobacteria as probiotic agents – physiological effects and clinical benefits. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 22 495–512. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02615.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Putignani L., Del Chierico F., Petrucca A., Vernocchi P., Dallapiccola B. (2014). The human gut microbiota: a dynamic interplay with the host from birth to senescence settled during childhood. Pediatr. Res. 76 2–10. 10.1038/pr.2014.49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Qin J., Li R., Raes J., Arumugam M., Burgdorf K. S., Manichanh C., et al. (2010). A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464 59–65. 10.1038/nature08821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Rajilic-Stojanovic M., Heilig H. G., Molenaar D., Kajander K., Surakka A., Smidt H., et al. (2009). Development and application of the human intestinal tract chip, a phylogenetic microarray: analysis of universally conserved phylotypes in the abundant microbiota of young and elderly adults. Environ. Microbiol. 11 1736–1751. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01900.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Roger L. C., Costabile A., Holland D. T., Hoyles L., McCartney A. L. (2010). Examination of faecal Bifidobacterium populations in breast- and formula-fed infants during the first 18 months of life. Microbiology 156 3329–3341. 10.1099/mic.0.043224-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Rondanelli M., Giacosa A., Faliva M. A., Perna S., Allieri F., Castellazzi A. M. (2015). Review on microbiota and effectiveness of probiotics use in older. World J. Clin. Cases 3 156–162. 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i2.156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Salazar N., Lopez P., Valdes L., Margolles A., Suarez A., Patterson A. M., et al. (2013). Microbial targets for the development of functional foods accordingly with nutritional and immune parameters altered in the elderly. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 32 399–406. 10.1080/07315724.2013.827047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Santacruz A., Collado M. C., Garcia-Valdes L., Segura M. T., Martin-Lagos J. A., Anjos T., et al. (2010). Gut microbiota composition is associated with body weight, weight gain and biochemical parameters in pregnant women. Br. J. Nutr. 104 83–92. 10.1017/s0007114510000176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Savignac H. M., Kiely B., Dinan T. G., Cryan J. F. (2014). Bifidobacteria exert strain-specific effects on stress-related behavior and physiology in BALB/c mice. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 26 1615–1627. 10.1111/nmo.12427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sela D. A., Chapman J., Adeuya A., Kim J. H., Chen F., Whiteheadf T. R., et al. (2008). The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis reveals adaptations for milk utilization within the infant microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 18964–18969. 10.1073/pnas.0809584105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sivan A., Corrales L., Hubert N., Williams J. B., Aquino-Michaels K., Earley Z. M., et al. (2015). Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Science 350 1084–1089. 10.1126/science.aac4255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Stsepetova J., Sepp E., Julge K., Vaughan E., Mikelsaar M., de Vos W. M. (2007). Molecularly assessed shifts of Bifidobacterium ssp. and less diverse microbial communities are characteristic of 5-year-old allergic children. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 51 260–269. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00306.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Taverniti V., Guglielmetti S. (2014). Methodological issues in the study of intestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome. World J. Gastroenterol. 20 8821–8836. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.8821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Tojo R., Suarez A., Clemente M. G., de los Reyes-Gavilan C. G., Margolles A., Gueimonde M., et al. (2014). Intestinal microbiota in health and disease: role of bifidobacteria in gut homeostasis. World J. Gastroenterol. 20 15163–15176. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Turnbaugh P. J., Hamady M., Yatsunenko T., Cantarel B. L., Duncan A., Ley R. E., et al. (2009). A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 457 480–484. 10.1038/nature07540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Turroni F., Peano C., Pass D. A., Foroni E., Severgnini M., Claesson M. J., et al. (2012). Diversity of bifidobacteria within the infant gut microbiota. PLoS ONE 7:e36957 10.1371/journal.pone.0036957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Underwood M. A., German J. B., Lebrilla C. B., Mills D. A. (2015). Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis: champion colonizer of the infant gut. Pediatr. Res. 77 229–235. 10.1038/pr.2014.156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. van Tongeren S. P., Slaets J. P., Harmsen H. J., Welling G. W. (2005). Fecal microbiota composition and frailty. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71 6438–6442. 10.1128/aem.71.10.6438-6442.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Voreades N., Kozil A., Weir T. (2014). Diet and the development of the human intestinal microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 5:494 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Wang F., Huang G., Cai D., Li D., Liang X., Yu T., et al. (2015). Qualitative and semiquantitative analysis of fecal Bifidobacterium species in centenarians living in Bama, Guangxi, China. Curr. Microbiol. 71 143–149. 10.1007/s00284-015-0804-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Woodmansey E. J. (2007). Intestinal bacteria and ageing. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102 1178–1186. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03400.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Woodmansey E. J., McMurdo M. E., Macfarlane G. T., Macfarlane S. (2004). Comparison of compositions and metabolic activities of fecal microbiotas in young adults and in antibiotic-treated and non-antibiotic-treated elderly subjects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70 6113–6122. 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6113-6122.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wu G. D., Lewis J. D. (2013). Analysis of the human gut microbiome and association with disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11 774–777. 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wu X., Ma C., Han L., Nawaz M., Gao F., Zhang X., et al. (2010). Molecular characterisation of the faecal microbiota in patients with type II diabetes. Curr. Microbiol. 61 69–78. 10.1007/s00284-010-9582-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Xu M., Wang B., Fu Y., Chen Y., Yang F., Lu H., et al. (2012). Changes of fecal Bifidobacterium species in adult patients with hepatitis B virus-induced chronic liver disease. Microb. Ecol. 63 304–313. 10.1007/s00248-011-9925-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Yatsunenko T., Rey F. E., Manary M. J., Trehan I., Dominguez-Bello M. G., Contreras M., et al. (2012). Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486 222–227. 10.1038/nature11053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhao L., Qiao X., Zhu J., Zhang X., Jiang J., Hao Y., et al. (2011). Correlations of fecal bacterial communities with age and living region for the elderly living in Bama, Guangxi, China. J. Microbiol. 49 186–192. 10.1007/s12275-011-0405-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES