Skip to main content
NIST Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIST Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Phys. 2016 May 13;119(18):184904. doi: 10.1063/1.4948700

Use of the Bethe Equation for Inner-Shell Ionization by Electron Impact

Cedric J Powell 1, Xavier Llovet 2, Francesc Salvat 3
PMCID: PMC4990790  NIHMSID: NIHMS804430  PMID: 27546903

Abstract

We analyzed calculated cross sections for K-, L-, and M-shell ionization by electron impact to determine the energy ranges over which these cross sections are consistent with the Bethe equation for inner-shell ionization. Our analysis was performed with K-shell ionization cross sections for 26 elements, with L-shell ionization cross sections for seven elements, with L3-subshell ionization cross sections for Xe, and with M-shell ionization cross sections for three elements. The validity or otherwise of the Bethe equation could be checked with Fano plots based on a linearized form of the Bethe equation. Our Fano plots, which display theoretical cross sections and available measured cross sections, reveal two linear regions as predicted by de Heer and Inokuti. For each region, we made linear fits and determined values of the two element-specific Bethe parameters. We found systematic variations of these parameters with atomic number for both the low- and the high-energy linear regions of the Fano plots. We also determined the energy ranges over which the Bethe equation can be used.

I. INTRODUCTION

Cross sections for ionization of inner-shell electrons in neutral atoms by electron impact are needed in many branches of physics including atomic physics, plasma physics, radiation physics, materials analysis by electron-probe microanalysis (EPMA), surface analysis by Auger-electron spectroscopy (AES), and thin-film analysis by electron energy-loss spectroscopy. These cross sections are often used in Monte Carlo simulations to predict, for example, radiation transport in matter and the generation of x-ray and Auger-electron signal intensities in EPMA and AES.

In 1930, Bethe1 developed a non-relativistic asymptotic expression for the cross section, per atom, for ionization of shell i in the form

σi=πe4EZibiEiln[ciEEi], (1)

where E = mv2 / 2 is the kinetic energy of the incident electrons, v is the electron velocity, Ei is the binding energy of electrons in shell i, Zi is the number of electrons in that shell, and e and m are the electronic charge and mass, respectively. The parameters bi and ci in Eq. (1) are given by:

bi=EiMi2∕Zi, (2)

and

ln(cimc22Ei)=CiMi2, (3)

where c is the velocity of light. The term Mi2 in Eqs. (2) and (3) is the square of the total dipole-matrix element for ionizing collisions while the term Ci in Eq. (3) is given by an integral of the generalized oscillator strength for inner-shell ionization.2 The parameter bi was estimated by Bethe (using hydrogenic wave functions) to be between 0.2 and 0.6 for inner shells and, for a given shell, to be a function of atomic number, Z. The parameter ci was estimated by Bethe to be about 4. Equation (1) was derived with use of the first Born approximation and is expected to be valid when E >> Ei and when the average energy transfer in the ionizing collision is much less than E.2 A relativistic version of Eq. (1), given as Eq. (4) below, was published by Fano.3

Despite the wide use of Eq. (1) and its relativistic counterpart for estimating cross sections for inner-shell ionization, there is limited knowledge of the Bethe parameters bi and ci and of the energy ranges over which these equations can be expected to be valid. Powell4-6 reported values of the Bethe parameters from fits to measured cross sections for inner-shell ionization, but the resulting parameter values were of necessity limited to the elements and energy ranges for which measurements were available.

We report a new analysis to determine the ranges of incident energy over which the Bethe equation is valid and the corresponding values of the Bethe parameters bi and ci. We make use of cross sections for K-, L- and M-shell ionization that were calculated by Bote et al.7,8 using a composite algorithm that combines the distorted-wave and plane-wave Born approximations. Llovet et al.9 recently reviewed these calculated cross sections and the available measured cross sections. They identified elements for which there were at least three (for K shells) or two (for L and M subshells) mutually consistent sets of cross-section measurements and for which the cross sections varied with energy as expected by theory; these selections were referred to as superior values. Llovet et al. found that the overall average root-mean-square deviation between the calculated cross sections and the selected measured values was 10.9 % and the overall average deviation was − 2.5 %. This degree of agreement was considered to be very satisfactory given the difficulties of making absolute cross-section measurements.9

A simple but valuable method of analyzing sets of cross-sections for inner-shell ionization (or indeed any other inelastic-scattering cross sections10) is the Fano plot.2,3,4-6,10 As suggested by the non-relativistic Bethe equation [Eq. (1)], a Fano plot is made by plotting σiEEi (e.g., from a set of measured or calculated cross sections over a particular energy range) versus ln(E / Ei); as we will see, a similar type of plot can be made based on the relativistic Bethe equation. If such a plot is judged to be linear, we can conclude that the data set is consistent with the Bethe equation and derive values of the Bethe parameters.4-6 However, de Heer and Inokuti11 have pointed out that Fano plots should display two linear regions if the energy range for the data set is sufficiently large. At relatively low energies, one linear region is found typically beginning at several times the threshold energy for inner-shell ionization, Ei.4 Another linear region is expected at higher energies with a smaller slope that occurs in what is termed the asymptotic Bethe region.

The cross sections for K-, L-, and M-shell ionization that were calculated by Bote et al.7,8 extend from the threshold energy for ionization to 100 GeV. The large energy range for these cross sections is thus well suited for a more extensive analysis of the Bethe equation based on Fano plots. Llovet et al.9 identified 26 elements (C, N, O, Ne, Al, Si, Ar, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, Se, Y, Pd, Ag, Sn, Sb, Au, Pb, and Bi) with measured K-shell ionization cross sections that satisfied their selection criteria. They similarly identified seven elements (Ag, Sn, Sm, Ta, Pb, Bi, and U) with satisfactory measurements of total L-shell ionization cross sections and one element (Xe) with satisfactory measurements of L3-subshell ionization cross sections. Finally, Llovet et al. identified three elements (Au, Pb, and Bi) that had satisfactory measurements of total M-shell ionization cross sections. We present Fano plots for each of these elements based on the calculated ionization cross sections. These plots clearly show the existence of two distinct linear regions, and we derive values of the Bethe parameters for each linear region. We then show systematic variations of the derived Bethe parameters with atomic number for the two linear regions and systematic differences in the Bethe parameters for K-, L-, and M-shell ionization.

II. THE FANO PLOT

The relativistic form of the Bethe equation for inner-shell ionization is:2,3

σi=2πe4mv2ZibiEi{[ln(β21−β2)−β2]+ln(cimc22Ei)}, (4)

where β is the ratio of the electron velocity to the velocity of light, c. It is convenient to rewrite Eq. (4) as:

σi=2πe4mv2ZibiEi(X+lnci)=2πe4mv2Mi2(X+lnci), (5)

where

X=[ln(β21−β2)−β2]+ln(mc22Ei). (6)

A Fano plot is prepared by plotting

YFano=σimv2Ei2πe4Zi, (7)

versus X as suggested by Eq. (5). For linear regions of the Fano plot,

YFano=bi(X+lnci). (8)

The Bethe parameter bi is the slope of the linear region of the plot, and the parameter ci is determined by the ordinate at X = 0, where YFano = bi ln ci. In the nonrelativistic limit, X ≈ ln(E / Ei) = ln U and mc2 β2 ≈ 2E where U = E / Ei is the overvoltage and E is the electron kinetic energy. Equation (7) then becomes

YFano=σiEi2Uπe4Zi=σiEEiπe4Zi. (9)

For ionization of L and M shells, we need to determine appropriate values of Ei and Zi depending on whether particular or all subshells contribute to the relevant ionization process. For ionization of all L subshells, for example, we have:

ML2=∑j=13MLj2 (10a)

and

lncL=1ML2∑j=13MLj2lncLj, (10b)

where MLj2 is the total dipole-matrix element squared for ionization of L-subshell j and cLj is the corresponding value of the parameter ci. The total number of electrons in the L shell is

ZL=∑j=13ZLj=8, (11a)

and the average L-shell binding energy, EL¯, is

EL¯=1ZL∑j=13ZLjELj, (11b)

where ZLj is the number of electrons in L-subshell j and ELj is the binding energy for these electrons. Similar equations can be written for ionization of all M subshells.

III. RESULTS

A. K-SHELL IONIZATION CROSS SECTIONS

Figures 1 to 5 show Fano plots in which YFano from Eq. (7) is plotted (solid lines) against X from Eq. (6) for C, N, O, Ne, Al, Si, Ar, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, Se, Y, Pd, Ag, Sn, Sb, Au, Pb, and Bi. In these plots, we have used the K-shell ionization cross sections, σK, calculated by Bote et al.7,8 and the K-shell binding energies tabulated by Williams.12 The abscissa also shows the corresponding electron kinetic energy, E. The Fano plots extend from the threshold for K-shell ionization (X = 0) to X = 20 where the maximum energy ranges from 600 MeV to 10 GeV. The solid circles in Figs. 1 to 5 show values of YFano calculated from Eq. (7) with the preferred measurements of K-shell ionization cross sections of Llovet et al. (Tables 2 and 7 of Ref. 9) versus X from Eq. (6).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Fano plots for C, N, O, Ne, Al, and Si (solid lines) based on K-shell ionization cross sections calculated by Bote et al.7,8 in which YFano from Eq. (7) is plotted against X from Eq. (6). The abscissa also shows the electron kinetic energy, E. The dashed lines show linear fits to the YFano values from the calculated cross sections with Eq. (8) in the asymptotic high-energy region of the Fano plots. The dashed lines have been extrapolated to a lower energy at which the deviation from the solid lines is 5 %. The solid circles show values of YFano calculated from the preferred measured K-shell ionization cross sections of Llovet et al. (Tables 2 and 7 of Ref. 9).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Fano plots for Pb and Bi; see caption to Fig. 1.

The Fano plots in Figs. 1 to 5 display two linear regions, as expected from the discussion of de Heer and Inokuti.11 We will now determine values of the Bethe parameters for each linear region. The dashed lines in Figs. 1 to 5 show linear fits with Eq. (8) to the YFano values from the calculated cross sectionsin the asymptotic high-energy regions of the Fano plots. The dashed lines have been extrapolated to a minimum energy, Emin, at which the deviation from the solid lines becomes 5 %. Table I shows values of the Bethe parameters bK and cK from the fits for each element, the values of Emin, and the corresponding overvoltage, Umin. We note that no uncertainties are given for the values of bK and cK since values of bK were determined from the asymptotic slopes of the Fano plots and then values of cK from the corresponding ordinate values at X = 0 where Y = bK ln cK. We see that the values of bK in Table I are about 0.52 for C, N, O, and Ne, and then gradually decrease with increasing Z to 0.281 for Bi. The values of cK in Table I, however, increase from 5.85 for C to 116 for Bi.

Table I.

Values of the Bethe parameters, bK and cK, derived from the linear fits with Eq. (8) in the high-energy asymptotic regions of the Fano plots with K-shell ionization cross sections in Figs. 1 to 5. We also show the minimum kinetic energy, Emin, at which the deviation of the fitted lines in the Fano plots of Figs. 1 to 5 becomes 5 % and the corresponding value of the overvoltage, Umin.

Element Z b K c K Emin (keV) U min
C 6 0.512 5.85 11.7 41.0
N 7 0.527 6.25 16.1 39.3
O 8 0.524 6.37 21.9 40.3
Ne 10 0.524 6.58 36.3 41.7
Al 13 0.485 8.41 73.6 47.2
Si 14 0.475 9.03 91.2 49.6
Ar 18 0.449 11.5 199.5 62.2
Ca 20 0.435 12.8 275.4 68.2
Ti 22 0.426 14.0 374.4 75.4
Cr 24 0.418 15.1 501.2 83.7
Mn 25 0.414 15.7 566.7 86.7
Fe 26 0.411 16.2 640.7 90.1
Ni 28 0.405 17.3 806.6 96.8
Cu 29 0.403 17.8 898.1 100.0
Zn 30 0.400 18.4 1000 103.5
Ga 31 0.397 19.1 1113 107.4
Ge 32 0.394 19.9 1240 111.7
Se 34 0.388 21.3 1468 116.0
Y 39 0.374 25.7 2291 134.5
Pd 46 0.357 32.9 4105 168.6
Ag 47 0.355 34.0 4365 171.1
Sn 50 0.347 38.0 5580 191.1
Sb 51 0.345 39.5 6026 197.6
Au 79 0.288 101 31623 391.7
Pb 82 0.283 113 38019 432.0
Bi 83 0.281 116 39204 433.1

The solid lines in Figs. 6 to 10 show expanded views of the low-energy regions of the Fano plots in Figs. 1 to 5, from X = 0 to X = 4. The dashed lines in Figs. 6 to 10 indicate linear fits to the YFano values from the calculated cross sections with Eq. (8) over energy regions, Emin to Emax, where the deviations with respect to the solid lines are less than 5 %. Table II shows values of the derived Bethe parameters bK and cK and their one-standard-deviation uncertainties from the fits for each element, the values of Emin and Emax, and the corresponding overvoltage values, Umin and Umax. We see that bK decreases from 0.806 for C and about 0.84 for N, O, and Ne to about 0.58 for Pb and Bi. These bK values are about 50 % larger than those in Table I for the low-Z elements and about 100 % larger than those in Table I for the high-Z elements. In contrast to the relatively large increases of cK in Table I with increasing Z for the high-energy regions of the Fano plots (an increase by a factor of about 20), the values of cK in Table II increase from 0.796 ± 0.002 for C to 1.333 ± 0.007 for Bi, an increase of less than a factor of two. We note that the fractional uncertainties for cK in Table II are larger than those for bK because the uncertainties in cK are determined from the uncertainties of both bK and bKlncK in each fit with Eq. (8).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Expanded view of the Fano plots for C, N, O, Ne, Al, and Si in Fig. 1 (solid lines) from X = 0 to X = 4. The abscissa also shows the electron kinetic energy, E. The dashed lines show linear fits to the YFano values from the calculated cross sections with Eq. (8) over the energy range, Emin to Emax, where the deviations from the solid lines are less than 5 %. The solid circles show values of YFano calculated from the preferred measured K-shell ionization cross sections of Llovet et al. (Tables 2 and 7 of Ref. 9).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Expanded view of the Fano plots for Pb and Bi in Fig. 5 from X = 0 to X = 4; see caption to Fig. 6.

Table II.

Values of the Bethe parameters, bK and cK, and their one-standard-deviation uncertainties derived from fits with Eq. (8) in the low-energy linear regions of the Fano plots with K-shell ionization cross sections in Figs. 6 to 10. We also show the minimum and maximum kinetic energies, Emin and Emax, at which the deviation of the fitted lines in the Fano plots of Figs. 6 to 10 are less than 5 % and the corresponding values of the overvoltage, Umin and Umax.

Element Z b K c K Emin
(keV)
Emax
(keV)
U min U max
C 6 0.8058 ± 0.0009 0.796 ± 0.002 0.66 6.21 2.3 21.8
N 7 0.8396 ± 0.0009 0.822 ± 0.002 0.90 8.07 2.2 19.7
O 8 0.8383 ± 0.0009 0.824 ± 0.002 1.18 10.5 2.2 19.3
Ne 10 0.8412 ± 0.0009 0.832 ± 0.002 1.88 16.9 2.2 19.4
Al 13 0.812 ± 0.001 0.860 ± 0.002 3.26 28.0 2.1 17.9
Si 14 0.804 ± 0.001 0.868 ± 0.002 3.80 32.6 2.1 17.7
Ar 18 0.791 ± 0.001 0.894 ± 0.002 6.31 53.3 2.0 16.6
Ca 20 0.781 ± 0.001 0.905 ± 0.002 7.82 66.1 1.9 16.4
Ti 22 0.775 ± 0.001 0.914 ± 0.002 9.55 80.7 1.9 16.2
Cr 24 0.770 ± 0.001 0.921 ± 0.002 11.5 95.5 1.9 15.9
Mn 25 0.769 ± 0.001 0.926 ± 0.002 12.4 104.7 1.9 16.0
Fe 26 0.767 ± 0.001 0.929 ± 0.002 13.4 113.1 1.9 15.9
Ni 28 0.764 ± 0.001 0.936 ± 0.002 15.6 129.8 1.9 15.6
Cu 29 0.763 ± 0.001 0.939 ± 0.002 16.9 138.0 1.9 15.4
Zn 30 0.762 ± 0.001 0.943 ± 0.002 17.9 146.8 1.9 15.4
Ga 31 0.760 ± 0.001 0.947 ± 0.002 19.3 156.1 1.9 15.1
Ge 32 0.758 ± 0.001 0.951 ± 0.002 20.6 166.0 1.9 14.9
Se 34 0.756 ± 0.001 0.959 ± 0.002 23.3 182.0 1.8 14.4
Y 39 0.747 ± 0.001 0.981 ± 0.002 30.2 225.6 1.8 13.2
Pd 46 0.734 ± 0.001 1.016 ± 0.003 41.7 284.0 1.7 11.7
Ag 47 0.732 ± 0.001 1.021 ± 0.003 43.7 292.9 1.7 11.5
Sn 50 0.724 ± 0.002 1.038 ± 0.003 48.6 321.1 1.7 11.0
Sb 51 0.722 ± 0.002 1.043 ± 0.003 50.9 326.1 1.7 10.7
Au 79 0.601 ± 0.002 1.292 ± 0.006 138.0 670.9 1.7 8.3
Pb 82 0.587 ± 0.002 1.320 ± 0.007 146.8 702.5 1.7 8.0
Bi 83 0.581 ± 0.002 1.333 ± 0.007 153.7 713.4 1.7 7.9

We see from Table II that the linear regions in Figs. 6 to 10 range from Umin ≈ 1.7 to Umax ≈ 8 for the high-Z elements while the linear regions for the low-Z elements range from Umin ≈ 2.2 to Umax ≈ 20. The linear regions for the elements C through Ni occur, as a group, from Umin = 2.3 to Umax = 15.6 . This overvoltage range is comparable to that of the 1976 Powell4 analysis (4 to 24) although the lower limit of the overvoltage range found here (2.3) is about a factor of two smaller than in the sets of data analyzed by Powell.

Values of Umin for the high-energy linear regions in Table I range from about 40 for the low-Z elements to about 400 for the high-Z elements. Values of Umax for the low-energy linear regions in Table II range from about 20 for the low-Z elements to about 8 for the high-Z elements. The Fano plots thus change their slopes (between the two linear regions) over a narrow range of X for the low-Z elements in Fig. 1 while the slope change is much more gradual for the high-Z elements in Figs. 4 and 5.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Fano plots for Y, Pd, Ag, Sn, Sb, and Au; see caption to Fig. 1.

B. L-SHELL IONIZATION CROSS SECTIONS

Figures 11 and 12 show Fano plots based on total cross sections for L-shell ionization, σL, in Ag, Sn, Sm, Ta, Pb, Bi, and U. As for Figs. 1 to 10, we have plotted YFano from Eq. (7) versus X from Eq. (6). The solid lines show YFano with the calculated cross sections of Bote et al.7,8 and the solid circles show YFano with the preferred measured cross sections of Llovet et al. (Tables 3 and 9 of Ref. 9). Values of YFano from Eq. (7) were calculated with the average L-shell binding energies determined from the L-subshell binding energies of Williams12 for each element that were weighted by the corresponding subshell occupancy numbers, as indicated by Eq. (11b). The abscissas in Figs. 11 and 12 also show the electron kinetic energy. As before, the Fano plots extend from the ionization threshold (X = 0) to X = 20 where the maximum energy is between 2 GeV and 5 GeV.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Fano plots for Ag, Sn, Xe, Sm, Ta, and Pb (solid lines) based on total L-shell ionization cross sections calculated by Bote et al.7,8 and Fano plot for Xe (solid line) based on the calculated L3-subshell ionization cross sections of Bote et al.7,8 In these plots, YFano from Eq. (7) is plotted against X from Eq. (6). The abscissa also shows the electron kinetic energy, E. The dashed lines show linear fits to the YFano values from the calculated cross sections with Eq. (8) in the asymptotic high-energy region of the Fano plots. The dashed lines have been extrapolated to a lower energy at which the deviation from the solid lines is 5 %. The solid circles show values of YFano calculated from the preferred measured total L-shell or L3-subshell ionization cross sections of Llovet et al. (Tables 3 and 9 of Ref. 9).

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Fano plots for Bi, and U; see caption to Fig. 11.

The Fano plots in Fig. 11 and 12 display two linear regions like those in Figs. 1 to 5 for K-shell ionization. We have again made linear fits to the YFano values from the calculated cross sections with Eq. (8) in the asymptotic high-energy linear regions of each Fano plot. These fits, indicated by the dashed lines, have been extrapolated, as before, to a minimum energy, Emin, at which the deviations from the solid lines become 5 %. Table III shows the Bethe parameters, bL and cL, from each fit, the values of Emin, and the corresponding values of Umin. We see that the values of bL in Table III decrease from about 0.42 for Ag to about 0.31 for U while the values of cL increase from about 15 for Ag to about 70 for U. The bL values in Table III are between 11 % and 17 % larger than the values of bK in Table I that decrease from about 0.36 for Ag to about 0.28 for Bi. However, the cL values in Table III are appreciably smaller than the cK values in Table I which range from 34 for Ag to 116 for Bi.

Table III.

Values of the Bethe parameters, bL and cL, derived from the linear fits with Eq. (8) in the high-energy asymptotic regions of the Fano plots in Figs. 11 and 12 for Ag, Sn, Sm, Ta, Pb, Bi, and U with total L-shell ionization cross sections. We also show the minimum kinetic energy, Emin, at which the deviation of the fitted lines in the Fano plots of Figs. 11 and 12 becomes 5 % and the corresponding value of the overvoltage, Umin.

Element Z b L c L Emin (keV) U min
Ag 47 0.419 15.4 202.6 57.8
Sn 50 0.405 17.9 259.0 62.9
Sm 62 0.364 29.1 621.3 87.3
Ta 73 0.346 38.6 1148 107.9
Pb 82 0.330 50.6 1848 129.4
Bi 83 0.328 52.2 1935 131.3
U 92 0.313 70.1 3114 161.7

Figures 13 and 14 show expanded views of the low-energy regions, from X = 0 to X = 4, of the Fano plots in Figs. 11 and 12. The dashed lines in Figs. 13 and 14 are, as before, linear fits to the YFano values from the calculated cross sections with Eq. (8) over energy regions, Emin to Emax, where the deviations with respect to the solid lines are less than 5 %. Table IV shows values of the derived Bethe parameters bL and cL and their one-standard-deviation uncertainties from the fits for each element, the values of Emin and Emax, and the corresponding overvoltage values, Umin and Umax. We see that bL decreases from about 0.74 for Ag to 0.68 for U while cL increases slightly from about 1.08 for Ag to about 1.30 for U. The bL values in Table IV are larger than the corresponding values in Table III (by around a factor of two for Ta, Pb, Bi, and U) while the values of cL in Table IV are more than an order of magnitude smaller than those in Table III. We also see that the values of bL and cL in Table IV are roughly comparable with the values of bK and cK in Table II for the elements Ag through Bi.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Expanded view of the Fano plots for Ag, Sn, Xe, Sm, Ta, and Pb in Fig. 11 (solid lines) from X = 0 to X = 4. The abscissa also shows the electron kinetic energy, E. The dashed lines show linear fits to the YFano values from the calculated cross sections with Eq. (8) over the energy range, Emin to Emax, where the deviations from the solid lines are less than 5 %. The solid circles show values of YFano calculated from the measured total L-shell ionization cross sections (or, for Xe, the preferred measured L3-subshell ionization cross sections) of Llovet et al. (Tables 3 and 9 of Ref. 9).

Fig.14.

Fig.14

Expanded view of the Fano plots for Bi, and U in Fig. 12 from X = 0 to X = 4; see caption to Fig. 13.

Table IV.

Values of the Bethe parameters, bL and cL, and their one-standard-deviation uncertainties derived from fits with Eq. (8) in the low-energy linear regions of the Fano plots with total L-shell ionization cross sections in Figs. 13 and 14. We also show the minimum and maximum kinetic energies, Emin and Emax, at which the deviation of the fitted lines in the Fano plots of Figs. 13 and 14 are less than 5 % and the corresponding values of the overvoltage, Umin and Umax.

Element Z b L c L Emin
(keV)
Emax
(keV)
U min U max
Ag 47 0.737 ± 0.001 1.078 ± 0.002 5.29 65.1 1.5 18.5
Sn 50 0.729 ± 0.001 1.096 ± 0.002 6.51 72.4 1.6 17.6
Sm 62 0.706 ± 0.001 1.157 ± 0.003 12.6 109.6 1.8 15.4
Ta 73 0.699 ± 0.001 1.195 ± 0.004 19.3 151.4 1.8 14.2
Pb 82 0.690 ± 0.001 1.240 ± 0.004 27.1 187.6 1.9 13.1
Bi 83 0.691 ± 0.001 1.240 ± 0.004 27.5 190.5 1.9 12.9
U 92 0.681 ± 0.002 1.297 ± 0.005 37.4 229.1 1.9 11.9

We also show Fano plots in Figs. 11 and 13 based on calculations and measurements of L3-subshell ionization cross sections for Xe (Z = 54). We found values of the Bethe parameters, bL3 and cL3, in the asymptotic high-energy region in Fig. 11 to be 0.410 and 20.7, respectively, Emin = 292.9 keV, and Umin = 61.2. These values are similar to the corresponding values from the total L-shell ionization cross sections for neighboring elements in Table III. For the linear fit to the low-energy region for Xe in Fig. 13, we found bL3 = 0.741 ± 0.001, cL3 = 1.165 ± 0.003, Emin = 9.3 keV, Emax = 89.8 keV, Umin = 1.9, and Umax = 18.8. These values are also similar to the corresponding values in Table IV derived from total L-shell ionization cross sections.

Finally, we note that the linear regions of the low-energy Fano plots in Figs. 13 and 14 range from Umin = 1.5 to Umax ≈ 19 for Ag to Umin = 1.9 to Umax ≈ 12 for U. We also see that the values of Umin in Table III for the high-energy Fano plots in Fig. 11 and 12 range from about 60 for Ag to about 162 for U. The Fano plots in Fig. 11 and 12 thus change their slopes (between the two linear regions) over a smaller range of X than for the Fano plots in Figs. 1 to 5.

C. M-SHELL IONIZATION CROSS SECTIONS

Figure 15 shows Fano plots based on total cross-sections for M-shell ionization, σM, in Au, Pb, and Bi. As for Figs. 1 to 14, we have plotted YFano from Eq. (7) versus X from Eq. (6). The solid lines show YFano with the calculated cross sections of Bote et al.7,8 and the solid circles show YFano with the preferred measured cross sections of Llovet et al. (Tables 4 and 11 of Ref. 9). Values of YFano from Eq. (7) were calculated with the average M-shell binding energies determined from the M-subshell binding energies of Williams12 for each element that were weighted by the corresponding subshell occupancy numbers using an equation analogous to Eq. (11b) for L-shell ionization. The abscissas in Figs. 11 and 12 also show the electron kinetic energy. As before, the Fano plots extend from the ionization threshold (X = 0) to X = 20 where the maximum energy is between 1 GeV and 2 GeV.

Fig. 15.

Fig. 15

Fano plots for Au, Pb, and Bi (solid lines) based on total M-shell ionization cross sections calculated by Bote et al.7,8 in which YFano from Eq. (7) is plotted against X from Eq. (6). The abscissa also shows the electron kinetic energy, E. The dashed lines show linear fits to the YFano values from the calculated cross sections with Eq. (8) in the asymptotic high-energy region of the Fano plots. The dashed lines have been extrapolated to a lower energy at which the deviation from the solid lines is 5 %. The solid circles show values of YFano calculated from the preferred measured total M-shell ionization cross sections of Llovet et al. (Tables 4 and 11 of Ref. 9).

Like Figs. 1 to 5, 11, and 12, the Fano plots in Fig. 15 show two linear regions. We have made linear fits to the YFano values from the calculated cross sections with Eq. (8) in the asymptotic high-energy linear regions of each Fano plot. These fits (dashed lines) have been extrapolated to a minimum energy, Emin, at which the deviations from the solid lines become 5 %. Table V shows the Bethe parameters, bM and cM, from each fit, the values of Emin, and the corresponding values of Umin. The values of bM in Table V for Pb and Bi are about 0.53, appreciably larger than the bL values for these elements in Table III (0.33). In contrast, the cM values in Table V for Pb and Bi (about 8.8) are much smaller than the cL values for these elements in Table III (about 51).

Table V.

Values of the Bethe parameters, bM and cM, derived from the linear fits with Eq. (8) in the high-energy asymptotic regions of the Fano plots in Fig. 15 for Au, Pb, and Bi with total M-shell ionization cross sections. We also show the minimum kinetic energy, Emin, at which the deviation of the fitted lines in the Fano plots of Figs. 15 becomes 5 % and the corresponding value of the overvoltage, Umin.

Element Z bM cM Emin (keV) U min
Au 79 0.541 7.79 97.0 37.5
Pb 82 0.529 8.63 111.3 38.3
Bi 83 0.526 8.92 118.4 39.2

Figure 16 shows expanded views of the low-energy regions, from X = 0 to X = 4, of the Fano plots in Fig. 15. As previously, the dashed lines in Fig. 16 are linear fits to the YFano values from the calculated cross sections with Eq. (8) over energy regions, Emin to Emax, where the deviations with respect to the solid line are less than 5 %. Table VI shows values of the resulting Bethe parameters, bM and cM, and their one-standard-deviation uncertainties as well as the values of Emin, Emax, Umin, and Umax. We see that the values of bM in Table VI for Pb are Bi (about 0.790) are larger than the bL values for these elements in Table IV (0.690) while the cM values in Table VI for the same elements (about 1.27) are essentially the same as the corresponding cL values in Table IV (1.24).

Fig. 16.

Fig. 16

Expanded views of the Fano plots for Au, Pb, and Bi in Fig. 15 (solid lines) from X = 0 to X = 4; see also caption to Fig. 15.

Table VI.

Values of the Bethe parameters, bM and cM, and their one-standard-deviation uncertainties derived from fits with Eq. (8) in the low-energy linear regions of the Fano plots with total M-shell ionization cross sections in Fig. 16. We also show the minimum and maximum kinetic energies, Emin and Emax, at which the deviation of the fitted lines in the Fano plots of Fig. 16 are less than 5 % and the corresponding values of the overvoltage, Umin and Umax.

Element Z b M c M Emin
(keV)
Emax
(keV)
U min U max
Au 79 0.795 ± 0.001 1.238 ± 0.002 5.50 83.2 2.1 32.2
Pb 82 0.791 ± 0.001 1.263 ± 0.002 6.12 84.5 2.1 29.1
Bi 83 0.788 ± 0.001 1.274 ± 0.002 6.41 87.1 2.1 28.9

The linear regions of the low-energy Fano plots in Fig. 16 extend from Umin = 2.1 for Au, Pb, and Bi to values of Umax ranging from about 32 for Au to about 29 for Bi. The values of Umin for the high-energy Fano plots in Fig. 15 are about 38. Unlike the L-shell Fano plots in Figs. 11 and 12, the M-shell Fano plots in Fig. 15 change their slopes between the two linear regions over a narrow range of X.

IV. DISCUSSION

Figure 17 shows plots of the Bethe parameters bi and ci (i= K, L, or M) as a function of Z from fits with Eq. (8) in the high-and low-energy regions of the Fano plots in Figs. 1 to 16. The top panels of Fig. 17 show plots of bi and ci from the fits in the high-energy regions of the Fano plots shown in Figs 1 to 5 for K-shell ionization, Figs. 11 and 12 for L-shell ionization, and Fig. 15 for M-shell ionization, as listed in Tables I, III, and V. We see that the values of bK (top-left panel) decrease monotonically from about 0.52 for C, N, O, and Ne to about 0.28 for Au, Pb, and Bi. The values of bL in the top-left panel, decreasing from about 0.41 for Ag and Sn to about 0.32 for Pb, Bi, and U, are about 15 % larger than the bK values for medium-Z (Ag and Sn) and high-Z elements (Pb and Bi). In contrast, the values of bM in the top-left panel of Fig. 17 (about 0.53 for Au, Pb, and Bi) are about 90 % larger than the bK values for the same elements (0.28).

Fig. 17.

Fig. 17

Plots of the Bethe parameters bi and ci (i= K, L, or M) as a function of Z from fits with Eq. (8) in the high-and low-energy regions of the Fano plots in Figs. 1 to 16 for K-shell ionization (blue squares), L-shell ionization (red circles), and M-shell ionization (green diamonds). The left panels show plots of bi while the right panels show plots of ci. The top panels show the Bethe parameters from the fits in the high-energy regions of the Fano plots (Figs. 1 to 5 for K-shell ionization, Figs. 11 and 12 for L-shell ionization, and Fig. 15 for M-shell ionization, as listed in Tables I, III, and V). The bottom panels show the Bethe parameters from the fits in the low-energy regions of the Fano plots (Figs. 6 to 10 for K-shell ionization, Figs. 13 and 14 for L-shell ionization, and Fig. 16 for M-shell ionization, as listed in Tables II, IV, and VI). Error bars, corresponding to one-standard-deviation uncertainties of the Bethe parameters obtained from the fits with the low-energy Fano plots, are smaller than the size of the symbols. Values of bL3 and cL3 for Xe are also included in each panel with values of bL and cL, respectively.

The values of cK from the high-energy fits (top-right panel of Fig. 17) increase monotonically with Z from about 5.9 for C to 116 for Bi. The values of cL, ranging from about 15 for Ag to about 70 for U, are roughly half of the values of cK for medium-Z and high-Z elements. Finally, the values of cM, between 7.8 and 8.9 for Au, Pb, and Bi, are about 13 times smaller than the values of cK for the same elements.

We turn now to the values of bi and ci in the bottom panels of Fig. 17 that were obtained from the fits in the low-energy regions of the Fano plots shown in Figs. 6 to 10 for K-shell ionization, Figs. 13 and 14 for L-shell ionization, and Fig. 16 for M-shell ionization, as listed in Tables II, IV, and VI. The value of bK (bottom-left panel) is 0.806 for C, increases to about 0.84 for N, O, and Ne, and then gradually decreases to 0.581 for Bi. The values of bL for Ag and Sn (about 0.73) are essentially the same as the values of bK for the same elements. However, the values of bL for Pb and Bi (about 0.69) are around 17 % larger than the values of bK for the same elements (about 0.59). We see that the values of bM for Au, Pb, and Bi (about 0.79) are about 34 % larger than the bK values for the same elements (about 0.59).

Overall, the bi values from the low-energy fits range from between 0.806 for C and about 0.84 for N, O and Ne (for K-shell ionization) to about 0.7 as a rough average of the values of bK, bL, and bM for the high-Z elements. In comparison, the bi values from the high-energy fits range from about 0.52 for C, N, O, and Ne to bK values of about 0.28 for Au, Pb, and Bi, to bL values of about 0.32 for Pb, Bi, and U, and to bM values of about 0.53 for Au, Pb, and Bi. The bK values from the low-energy fits are thus about 60 % larger than those from the high-energy fits for the low-Z elements, the bL values from the low-energy fits are roughly double those from the high-energy fits for the medium- and high-Z elements, and the bM values from the low-energy fits are about 50 % larger than those from the high-energy fits.

The values of cK from the low-energy fits (bottom-right panel of Fig. 17) increase monotonically with Z from 0.796 for C to 1.043 for Sb but are then about 1.3 for Au, Pb, and Bi. The values of cL range from 1.078 for Ag to 1.297 for U while the values of cM are about 1.26 for Au, Pb, and Bi. These ci values are appreciably less than those obtained from the high-energy fits which can be larger by between roughly one to two orders of magnitude.

The values of bi from the high-energy fits (top-left panel of Fig. 17) range from about 0.28 (bK values for Au, Pb, and Bi) to about 0.53 (bK value for N and bM values for Au, Pb, and Bi). This range corresponds to that estimated by Bethe1 (0.2 to 0.6) with hydrogenic wave functions. However, the values of ci from the high-energy fits (top-right panel of Fig. 17), between 5 and 116, are generally much larger than the value estimated by Bethe (about 4).

We now comment briefly on the measured cross sections for K-shell ionization shown as solid circles in Figs. 1 to 5. For some of the measured K-shell ionization cross sections (e.g., Si in Fig. 1; Ca, Cr, and Mn in Fig. 2; Ni, Cu, and Ge in Fig. 3; and Y, Ag, Sn, and Au in Fig. 4), there are sufficient measurements in both the low-energy and high-energy regions of the Fano plots to define adequately the two expected linear regions.11 These two regions have not been separately observed before because cross-section measurements made in a particular laboratory were generally made over a limited range of incident electron energies. Other measured K-shell ionization cross sections (e.g., C, N, O, and Ne in Fig. 1; Ti and Fe in Fig. 2; Ga in Fig. 3; and Sb in Fig. 4) were made with incident energies that occurred only in the low-energy regions of the Fano plots. There are fewer measured cross sections for L-shell ionization in Fig. 11 and 12 and for M-shell ionization in Fig. 15 than for K-shell ionization and it is consequently harder to discern, for any one element, the existence of two linear regions in the Fano plots. The calculated ionization cross sections of Bote et al.7,8 were thus not only invaluable for providing a framework for the evaluation of the measured cross sections9 but also for clearly indicating, by the Fano plots shown here, the existence of two linear regions in the Fano plots for each element.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Fano plots for Ar, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, and Fe; see caption to Fig. 1.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Fano plots for Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, and Se; see caption to Fig. 1.

V. SUMMARY

We analyzed the calculated cross sections of Bote et al.7,8 for K-, L-, and M-shell ionization by electron impact to determine the energy ranges over which these cross sections are consistent with the Bethe equation for inner-shell ionization.1-3 The Bethe equation is a relatively simple analytical expression with two element-specific parameters, bi and ci. The validity (or otherwise) of the Bethe equation for a particular set of calculated or measured ionization cross sections can be checked with a Fano plot3 based on a linearized form of the Bethe equation. If such a plot is found to be linear for a specified energy range, the Bethe parameters, bi and ci, can be determined.

Our analysis was performed with calculated7,8 K-shell ionization cross sections for 26 elements (C, N, O, Ne, Al, Si, Ar, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, Se, Y, Pd, Ag, Sn, Sb, Au, Pb, and Bi), for total L-shell ionization cross sections for seven elements (Ag, Sn, Sm, Ta, Pb, Bi, and U), with L3-subshell ionization cross sections of Xe, and with total M-shell ionization cross sections of three elements (Au, Pb, and Bi). We have previously shown that the calculated cross sections for these elements and shells, available from the threshold energy for ionization to 1 GeV, agreed satisfactorily with sets of measured cross sections that were mutually consistent with each other and which varied with energy as expected by theory.9

Our Fano plots for each element and shell showed two linear regions as predicted by de Heer and Inokuti.11 For each region, we made linear fits and obtained values of the Bethe parameters, bi and ci. Values of bi for the high-energy regions were determined from the asymptotic high-energy slopes of the Fano plots after which ci values could be calculated. The resulting straight lines were extrapolated to lower energies at which the deviations between the straight lines and each plot became 5 %. The linear fits for the low-energy regions were made over energy ranges for which the deviations between the fit and each plot were also less than 5 %. Our values of bi and ci for each element and shell are presented in Tables I to VI together with the energy ranges for which they can be used. For the high-energy fits, the minimum overvoltage ranged from about 40 for K-shell ionization of C, N, O, and Ne to around 430 for Pb, and Bi while the minimum overvoltage varied from about 60 for L-shell ionization of Ag and Sn to around 160 for U; for M-shell ionization of Au, Pb, and Bi, the minimum overvoltage was around 38. For the low-energy fits, the overvoltage ranged from between around 2 and 20 for K-shell ionization of C, N, O, and Ne to between 1.7 and about 8 for Au, Pb, and Bi, and the corresponding overvoltage ranged from between 1.6 and about 18 for L-shell ionization of Ag and Sn to between 1.9 and about 12 for Pb, Bi, and U; for M-shell ionization, the overvoltage ranged between about 2 and about 30 for Au, Pb, and Bi.

We found systematic variations of bi and ci with Z. Values of bK for the high-energy regions of the Fano plots decreased monotonically from about 0.52 for C, N, O, and Ne to about 0.28 for Au, Pb, and Bi while values of bL decreased from about 0.41 for Ag and Sn to about 0.32 for Pb, Bi, and U, and bM was about 0.53 for Au, Pb, and Bi. There were much larger variations in ci with Z for the high-energy regions, with cK increasing from about 5.9 for C to 116 for Bi, and cL increasing from about 15 for Ag to about 70 for U. For the low-energy regions of the Fano plots, bK decreased from about 0.84 for N, O, and Ne to 0.581 for Bi, the values of bL decreased from about 0.74 for Ag to about 0.68 for U, and bM was about 0.79 for Au, Pb, and Bi. There are much smaller variations of ci with Z for the low-energy fits than for the high-energy fits, with cK varying between 0.796 for C to about 1.3 for Au, Pb, and Bi, with cL ranging between 1.078 for Ag to 1.297 for U, and with cM about 1.26 for Au, Pb, and Bi.

Our values of bi and ci for the elements in Tables I to VI can be used to determine cross sections from the Bethe equation for ionization of K, L, and M shells by electron impact for the designated energy or overvoltage ranges. Similar evaluations can be made for other elements with values of bi and ci determined by interpolation. For many applications, however, it may be more convenient to determine these cross sections, for any element and for any energy from the ionization threshold to 100 GeV, from the empirical equations and parameters published by Bote et al.8

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Expanded view of the Fano plots for Ar, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, and Fe in Fig. 2 from X = 0 to X = 4; see caption to Fig. 6.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Expanded view of the Fano plots for Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, and Se in Fig. 3 from X = 0 to X = 4; see caption to Fig. 6.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Expanded view of the Fano plots for Y, Pd, Ag, Sn, Sb, and Au in Fig. 4 from X = 0 to X = 4; see caption to Fig. 6.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad and the European Regional Development Fund (project no. FPA2013-44549-P) and from the Generalitat de Catalunya (grant 2014 SGR 846) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  • 1.Bethe H. Ann. Physik. 1930;5:325. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Inokuti M. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1971;43:297. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fano U. Phys. Rev. 1954;95:1198. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Powell CJ. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1976;48:33. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Powell CJ. Chap. 6. In: Märk TD, Dunn GH, editors. Electron Impact Ionization. Springer-Verlag; Vienna: 1985. pp. 198–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Powell CJ. In: Microbeam Analysis – 1990. Michael JR, Ingram P, editors. San Francisco Press; San Francisco: 1990. p. 13. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bote D, Salvat F. Phys. Rev. A. 2008;77:042701. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bote D, Salvat F, Jablonski A, Powell CJ. At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables. 2009;95:871. [Google Scholar]; ibid. 2011;97:186. erratum: [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Llovet X, Powell CJ, Salvat F, Jablonski A. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 2014;43:013102. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tanuma S, Powell CJ, Penn DR. Surf. Interface Anal. 2011;43:689. doi: 10.1002/sia.6123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.de Heer FJ, Inokuti M. Chap. 7. In: Märk TD, Dunn GH, editors. Electron Impact Ionization. Springer-Verlag; Vienna: 1985. pp. 232–276. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Williams GP. In: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 91st ed. Haynes WM, Lide DR, editors. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2011. pp. 221–226. Section 10. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES