Skip to main content
Brain logoLink to Brain
. 2014 Feb 4;137(2):308–309. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu005

Weighing in on Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: effects of mitochondrial mass

Michio Hirano 1,
PMCID: PMC4990816  PMID: 24501072

Among mitochondrial diseases, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) stands out as a prototype in several respects. It was the first mitochondrial disease to be clinically recognized by Dr Albrecht von Graefe (1858) but was named after Dr Theodore Leber who, 13 years after the original report, described 15 patients with the disease, from four different families (Leber, 1871). LHON also has the distinction of being the initial human disorder noted to be maternally inherited (Wallace, 1970) and the first to be linked to a pathogenic point mutation of mitochondrial DNA (Wallace et al., 1988).

This common mitochondrial disease typically presents in males during adolescence or young adulthood with painless loss of central vision in one eye, followed by loss of vision in the second eye within weeks or months (Newman, 2005; Barboni et al., 2010). The loss of vision is because of selective vulnerability of retinal ganglion cells in the papillomacular bundle. In the majority of cases, LHON is a result of one of three mitochondrial DNA point mutations within genes encoding polypeptide subunits of complex I of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Unlike most mitochondrial DNA mutations, which are heteroplasmic (a mixture of both mutant and normal mitochondrial genomes) in the majority of patients, LHON mutations are homoplasmic (only mutant mitochondrial DNA is present). Despite the early recognition of this mitochondrial disease and its cause, many features of LHON are still unknown.

One of the most vexing features of LHON mutations is their incomplete inheritance; thus, all matrilineal members of a LHON pedigree carry the pathogenic mitochondrial DNA genotype, but only some individuals develop the blindness. Previously, the team led by Drs Valerio Carelli and Carla Giordano reported that oestrogens improved mitochondrial dysfunction in cultured cells harbouring LHON mutations, thereby providing an explanation for the predominance of males affected by this disease (Giordano et al., 2011).

In this issue of Brain, Giordano et al. (2014) report elegant results indicating that increased mass of mitochondria is neuroprotective in unaffected carriers of LHON mutations. Mitochondrial proliferation is a well recognized phenomenon in many mitochondrial diseases and manifests as ragged-red fibres in muscle biopsies (DiMauro and Schon, 2008). The ragged-red fibres are striking in skeletal muscle treated with the modified Gomori trichrome stain that highlights the abundant mitochondria in the subsarcolemmal regions of muscle fibres. This histological hallmark of mitochondrial diseases is most often observed in patients with mitochondrial DNA point mutations or large-scale deletions that affect transfer RNA genes required for mitochondrial protein synthesis. In contrast, when mitochondrial DNA point mutations affect genes encoding polypeptide subunits of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, ragged-red fibres are often not seen, as is the case in LHON. Nevertheless, subtle subsarcolemmal increases in mitochondria were observed in muscle and blood cells of patients with LHON (Larsson et al., 1991) but largely ignored by investigators in the field.

Giordano et al. (2014) not only noted the earlier reports of increased mitochondrial mass in cells of patients with LHON, they also performed meticulous analyses of mitochondria mass in cells and tissues of a large cohort of affected and carrier individuals with LHON mutations. Surprisingly, they observed that the average mitochondrial DNA content in white blood cells of LHON patients was twice as high as the mean mitochondrial DNA content in healthy controls whereas asymptomatic LHON mutation carriers had about three times more mitochondrial DNA in leucocytes compared with controls. They recorded similar increases in mitochondrial DNA in muscle and cultured fibroblasts of LHON mutation carriers and patients, as well as increases in mitochondrial transcripts, respiratory chain proteins and enzyme activities, and biogenesis factors relative to controls indicating a generalized increase in mitochondria rather than just mitochondrial DNA. The high mitochondrial DNA content in leucocytes was associated with milder subclinical signs of ocular pathology (e.g. temporal retinal nerve fibre thickness assessed by ocular coherence tomography) while pathological studies of a single asymptomatic LHON mutation carrier revealed increased mitochondrial DNA level in the vulnerable macular retinal ganglion cells further suggesting that increased mitochondrial mass is protective against the adverse effects of LHON mutations. Functional studies of fibroblasts demonstrated that after stress, cells from asymptomatic mutation carriers activated mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial DNA replication more effectively than cells from patients with LHON. Collectively, these findings indicate that mitochondrial mass increases in response to LHON mutations and large increases may be protective in asymptomatic carriers. Presumably, the increased amount of mitochondrial compensates for the defect of respiratory chain complex I in the patients.

Although this excellent translational research study by Giordano et al. (2014) strongly supports the notion that mitochondrial biogenesis is protective in LHON, proof of this concept will require identification of the factor(s) responsible for activating mitochondrial proliferation and experimental manipulation of the biogenesis factors in cells and animal models. If validated and extended, these observations will have clinical diagnostic and therapeutic implications, as noted by the authors. For example, they note that levels of mitochondrial DNA in white blood cells of LHON mutation carriers may prove to be a biomarker predictive of developing blindness. Identification of the pathway responsible for mitochondrial DNA biogenesis will provide a pharmacological target to prevent blindness in unaffected mutation carriers. Studies have already demonstrated promising therapeutic effects of activating mitochondrial biogenesis in mouse models of mitochondrial diseases with defects of the respiratory chain (Wenz et al., 2008; Viscomi et al., 2011). Remarkably, Giordano et al. have shown that asymptomatic LHON mutation carriers may already be taking advantage of enhancing mitochondrial mass to prevent blindness.

References

  1. Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Savini G, Ramos Cdo V, Carta A, Berezovsky A, et al. Natural history of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy: longitudinal analysis of the retinal nerve fiber layer by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:623–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DiMauro S, Schon EA. Mitochondrial disorders in the nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:91–123. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Giordano C, Iommarini L, Giordano L, Maresca A, Pisano A, Valentino ML, et al. Efficient mitochondrial biogenesis drives incomplete penetrance in Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Brain. 2014;137:335–53. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Giordano C, Montopoli M, Perli E, Orlandi M, Fantin M, Ross-Cisneros FN, et al. Oestrogens ameliorate mitochondrial dysfunction in Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Brain. 2011;134:220–34. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Larsson NG, Andersen O, Holme E, Oldfors A, Wahlstrom J. Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy and complex I deficiency in muscle. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:701–8. doi: 10.1002/ana.410300511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Leber TH. Ueber hereditäre und congenital-angelegte Sehnervenleiden. Graefe's Archiv Ophthalmol. 1871;17:249–91. [Google Scholar]
  7. Newman NJ. Hereditary optic neuropathies: from the mitochondria to the optic nerve. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:517–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Viscomi C, Bottani E, Civiletto G, Cerutti R, Moggio M, Fagiolari G, et al. In vivo correction of COX deficiency by activation of the AMPK/PGC-1alpha axis. Cell Metab. 2011;14:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. von Graefe A. Ein ungewöhnlicher Fall von hereditäre amaurose. Arch Ophthalmol. 1858;4:266–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wallace DC. A new manifestation of Leber's disease and a new explanation for the agency responsible for its unusual pattern of inheritance. Brain. 1970;93:121–32. doi: 10.1093/brain/93.1.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wallace DC, Singh G, Lott MT, Hodge JA, Schurr TG, Lezza AMS, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutation associated with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Science. 1988;242:1427–30. doi: 10.1126/science.3201231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wenz T, Diaz F, Spiegelman BM, Moraes CT. Activation of the PPAR/PGC-1 alpha pathway prevents a bioenergetic deficit and effectively improves a mitochondrial myopathy phenotype. Cell Metab. 2008;8:249–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]

Articles from Brain are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES