Abstract
Venous congestion and volume overload are important in cardiorenal syndromes, in which multiple regulated factors are involved, including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). To investigate the underlying role of lncRNAs in regulating the development of venous congestion, an Affymetrix microarray associated with peripheral venous congestion was annotated, then a bipartite dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network was constructed in which nodes indicated lncRNAs or mRNAs. The nodes were connected when the lncRNAs or mRNAs were dynamically co-expressed. Following functional analysis of this network, several dynamic alternative pathways were identified, including the calcium signaling pathway during venous congestion development. Additionally, certain lncRNAs (LINC00523, LINC01210 and RP11-435O5.5) were identified that may potentially dynamically regulate certain proteins, including plasma membrane calcium ATPase (PMCA) and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), in the calcium signaling pathway. Particularly, the dynamically regulated switch of LINC00523 from co-expression with PMCA to GPCR may be involved in damage to steady state intracellular calcium. In brief, the current study demonstrated a potential novel mechanism of lncRNA function during venous congestion.
Keywords: long noncoding RNAs, venous congestion, co-expression network, calcium signaling pathway
Introduction
Despite advances in pharmacological and mechanical therapies, acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains one of the most frequently encountered cardiovascular diseases and its post-discharge mortality rates can reach 8.1 and 20.5% within 3 months and 1 year, respectively (1–3). Over the past decades, it has become evident that acute heart failure (HF) and renal failure (RF) are associated with systemic inflammatory activation (4). It has become increasingly recognized that venous congestion and volume overload are involved in the cardiorenal syndrome (4,5). Certain animal and human studies indicate that congestion may lead to venous endothelial activation with peripheral synthesis and release of proinflammatory mediators, including cyclooxygenase-2, inducible nitric oxide synthase, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (6–8). These suggest that the venous endothelium is in a proinflammatory state in times of venous congestion (4). To investigate global mRNA changes during peripheral venous congestion, Colombo et al (5) simulated peripheral venous congestion and analyzed mRNA by using the Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarray.
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have become a research hotspot for numerous diseases. A number of lncRNAs have been demonstrated to have important and diverse functions (9,10). LncRNA-associated dysfunction has been demonstrated to be important in cancer (11), cardiovascular diseases (12), and neurodegeneration diseases (11). Particularly, it is becoming evident that lncRNA may be involved in cardiovascular diseases. For example, the myocardial infarction-associated transcript lncRNA is associated with myocardial infarction (13). Another study identified 15 lncRNAs modulated in the heart of mice subjected to aortic constriction (14). However, global analysis of lncRNA associated with peripheral venous congestion is required and the potential underlying regulatory mechanisms remain unclear, due to the limited RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data. Thus, the present study re-annotated an Affymetrix microarray associated with peripheral venous congestion, then constructed a dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network (5). Following functional analysis of this network, it was demonstrated, although the genes (mRNAs) and lncRNAs were different, certain venous congestion-associated GO terms, including ion channel activity, were identified. The current study also identified certain lncRNA dynamically regulated pathways, including dilated cardiomyopathy and the calcium signaling pathway, in which the involvement of lncRNAs persistently occurred from normal and peripheral venous congestion conditions. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to analyze the dynamic lncRNA-associated mechanism of peripheral venous congestion and provide insights into the understanding of the functional mechanism of peripheral venous congestion and lncRNAs.
Materials and methods
Microarray data
The microarray data set GSE38783 was accessed using the Gene Expression Omnibus database (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE38783). This data set was obtained from 12 healthy subjects using the Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarray (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) (5). Venous arm pressure was increased to 30 mmHg above the baseline level by inflating a tourniquet cuff around the dominant arm (test arm). Then endothelial cells were obtained from blood samples from the test and control arm (lacking an inflated cuff) before and after 75 min of venous congestion (5).
Functional re-annotation of lncRNAs
To re-annotate micro-array data, a non-coding RNA function annotation server (ncFANs) was used to re-annotate the probes of the HG-U133 Plus 2.0 array as described on the ncFANs website (15). Then each probe was converted into gene Ensembl Gene IDs. There were 3495 lncRNAs re-annotated. When a gene matched more than one probe, the expression value of this mRNA or lncRNA was computed by taking the average expression value of all the corresponding probes.
Construction of dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network
Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) was calculated between expressed values of each lncRNA-mRNA pair in normal samples and venous congestion samples. The co-expressed lncRNA-mRNA pairs with PCC>0.99 or <−0.99 and P<0.01 were selected. To construct the dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network, two lncRNA-mRNA co-expression networks were initially constructed based on lncRNA-mRNA co-expression associations in normal samples and venous congestion samples. Then, the different sets of the above two networks were calculated and the following two novel networks identified: i) 'Lost' network, in which lncRNA-mRNA co-expression pairs only appeared in normal samples and not in the venous congestion samples; and ii) 'obtained' network in which co-expression pairs only appeared in venous congestion samples and not in normal samples. Finally, the 'lost' and 'obtained' networks were combined together to obtain the final dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network (the edges of 'lost' and 'obtained' network were added). The procedure is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of construction of the dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network. The 'normal' and 'venous congestion' samples represented the arms before and after the induced hypertension treatment, respectively. PCC, Pearson's correlation coefficient; lncRNA, long non-coding RNA.
Functional enrichment
To determine potential functions of lncRNAs, co-expressed genes for the lncRNAs were obtained then GO enrichment was implemented to identify the affected GO terms of lncRNA co-expressed genes using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery 6.7 (16). P<0.01 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Pathway annotation used the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) search and color tools.
Results
Co-expression networks based on normal and venous congestion samples
To construct the dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network, two lncRNA-mRNA co-expression networks based on lncRNA-mRNA co-expression associations in normal samples and venous congestion samples were initially constructed. In the 'venous congestion' co-expression network, there were 56 lncRNA nodes, 61 mRNA nodes and 64 edges, whereas the 'normal' network contained 364 lncRNA-gene co-expressing associations composed of 175 lncRNAs and 275 mRNAs (Fig. 2A and B).
Figure 2.
lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network in (A) venous congestion samples and (B) normal samples. lncRNA, long noncoding RNA.
'Lost' and 'obtained' network
The different sets of the above two networks were then calculated and the following two novel networks were created: i) The 'lost' network contained 350 edges composed by 172 lncRNA and 266 mRNA nodes and ii) the 'obtained' network contained 56 edges composed of 52 lncRNA and 54 mRNA nodes (Fig. 3A and B). To investigate the 'lost' and 'obtained' functions, GO enrichment was performed on the two networks (Tables I and II). Certain terms (including ion channel activity) were significantly enriched (P<0.01), although the mRNAs in the two networks differed.
Figure 3.
(A) 'Obtained' lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network and (B) the 'lost' lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network. lncRNA, long noncoding RNA.
Table I.
GO terms enriched by 'obtained' genes.
| GO term | P-value |
|---|---|
| GO:0005216 ion channel activity | 0.002033 |
| GO:0022838 substrate specific channel activity | 0.002323 |
| GO:0015267 channel activity | 0.002700 |
| GO:0022803 passive transmembrane transporter activity | 0.002728 |
| GO:0005261 cation channel activity | 0.003950 |
| GO:0022836 gated channel activity | 0.006033 |
| GO:0046873 metal ion transmembrane transporter activity | 0.007346 |
GO, gene ontology.
Table II.
GO terms enriched by 'lost' genes.
| GO terms | P-value |
|---|---|
| GO:0015267 channel activity | 0.001265 |
| GO:0022803 passive transmembrane transporter activity | 0.001296 |
| GO:0043565 sequence-specific DNA binding | 0.001758 |
| GO:0003700 transcription factor activity | 0.002589 |
| GO:0005261 cation channel activity | 0.002731 |
| GO:0046873 metal ion transmembrane transporter activity | 0.003682 |
| GO:0005216 ion channel activity | 0.005109 |
| GO:0043176 amine binding | 0.005961 |
| GO:0022838 substrate specific channel activity | 0.006561 |
| GO:0000287 magnesium ion binding | 0.007641 |
GO, gene ontology.
Dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network
The 'lost' and 'obtained' networks were combined to obtain the final dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network (Fig. 4). This network contained 524 nodes (211 lncRNA nodes and 313 mRNA nodes) and 406 edges. The giant component was formed of 172 nodes. The top 10 highest degree nodes are demonstrated in Tables III and IV. The current study demonstrated that certain lncRNAs exhibited co-expressed mRNAs in the normal and venous congestion conditions, indicating that these lncRNAs may dynamically regulate certain biological process during the development of venous congestion. Certain mRNAs also had co-expressed lncRNA partners in both conditions, indicating that they were dynamically regulated by different lncRNAs during the development of venous congestion.
Figure 4.
Dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network. The triangle nodes denote lncRNA and rectangle nodes denote mRNAs. The red and green edge denotes co-expression associations between a lncRNA and an mRNA were lost in normal conditions or 'newly' obtained in venous congestion conditions, respectively. lncRNA, long noncoding RNA.
Table III.
Top 10 long non-coding RNA nodes with the highest degree.
| Ensembl ID | Name | Degree |
|---|---|---|
| ENSG00000196273 | LINC00523 | 14 |
| ENSG00000225946 | RP11-395B7.2 | 11 |
| ENSG00000267649 | CTD-2587H24.10 | 11 |
| ENSG00000233101 | HOXB-AS3 | 8 |
| ENSG00000260394 | LA16c-313D11.9 | 8 |
| ENSG00000224184 | AC096559.1 | 8 |
| ENSG00000270168 | LA16c-380H5.4 | 7 |
| ENSG00000272933 | RP11-47A8.5 | 7 |
| ENSG00000228008 | CTD-2330K9.3 | 7 |
| ENSG00000259905 | PWRN1 | 7 |
LINC00523, long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 523; HOB-AS3, HOXB cluster antisense RNA 3; PWRN1, Prader-Willi region non-protein coding RNA 1.
Table IV.
Top 10 mRNA nodes with the highest degree.
| Ensembl ID | Name | Degree |
|---|---|---|
| ENSG00000176884 | GRIN1 | 7 |
| ENSG00000183250 | C21orf67 | 5 |
| ENSG00000167011 | NAT16 | 5 |
| ENSG00000108342 | CSF3 | 4 |
| ENSG00000086205 | FOLH1 | 4 |
| ENSG00000186868 | MAPT | 4 |
| ENSG00000123989 | CHPF | 4 |
| ENSG00000178498 | DTX3 | 3 |
| ENSG00000141150 | RASL10B | 3 |
| ENSG00000154252 | GAL3ST2 | 3 |
GRIN1, glutamate ionotropic receptor N-methyl D-aspartate 1; C21orf67, long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1547; NAT16, N-acetyltransferase 16; CSF3, colony stimulating factor 3; FOLH1, folate hydrolase (prostate-specific membrane antigen) 1; MAPT, microtubule associated protein tau; CHPF, chondroitin polymerizing factor; DTX3, deltex 3, E3 ubiquitin ligase; RASL10B, RAS like family 10 member B; GAL3ST2, galactose-3-O-sulfotransferase 2.
Detection of dynamically alternative pathways potentially regulated by lncRNAs
To investigate the dynamic alternative biological functions of lncRNAs during the development of venous congestion, lncRNA co-expressing mRNAs in the 'lost' and 'obtained' networks were mapped into KEGG pathways. A dynamic alternative pathway network was constructed (Fig. 5A). The present study demonstrated that i) There were certain pathways directly associated with venous congestion (hsa05414, dilated cardiomyopathy; these pathways are illustrated with red labels in Fig. 5A); and ii) certain pathways (hsa05414, dilated cardiomyopathy; hsa04020, calcium signaling pathway), were annotated by the 'lost' and 'obtained' mRNAs. For detailed investigation of the dynamic changes, the 'lost' and 'obtained' mRNAs were mapped into proteins in the calcium signaling pathway (Fig. 5B; pink rectangle and blue pentagram represent proteins which were potentially regulated by lncRNAs in normal and venous congestion samples).
Figure 5.
(A) Dynamically alternative pathway network. (B) Calcium signaling pathway; the pink rectangle and blue pentagram denoted proteins which were annotated by 'lost' and 'obtained' mRNAs, meaning that they were dynamically regulated lncRNAs in normal and venous congestion condition, respectively. lncRNA, long non-coding RNA; NCX: Na+/Ca2+ exchanger-3; PMCA, plasma membrane calcium ATPase; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; ORAI, calcium release-activated calcium modulator; CAV, certain voltage-activated Ca2+ channels; ROC, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α-7; Gq, guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(q) subunit α; PTK, receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2; TCR, T cell receptor α-chain V region; BCR, immunoglobulin heavy chain; CD38, ADP-ribosyl cyclase 1; Gs, guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) subunit α; ADCY, adenylate cyclase 1; PLC, phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C; SPHK, sphingosine kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; STIM, stromal interaction molecule; PLN, phospholamban; SERCA, Ca2+ transporting ATPase, sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum; RYR, ryanodine receptor; IP3R, inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor type; CALM, calmodulin; VDAC, voltage-dependent anion channel protein; TnC, troponin C, slow skeletal and cardiac muscles; MLCK, myosin-light-chain kinase; PHK, phosphorylase kinase; CaN, serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B; CAMK, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase; NOS, nitric-oxide synthase; PDE1, phosphodiesterase 1; FAK2, focal adhesion kinase 2; IP33K, 1D-myo-inositol-triphosphate 3-kinase; PKC, protein kinase C.
Discussion
In recent years, the significant functional molecular mechanisms of lncRNAs have been recognized, particularly in cardiovascular diseases. RNA-Seq is currently a prevalent technique to profile lncRNAs. However, due to relatively high cost of RNA-Seq techniques, publicly available RNA-Seq data are limited compared with microarray expression profile data. Furthermore, RNA-Seq data lack high sample numbers, in contrast with microarray expression profile data that often contains dozens to hundreds of pair-matched samples. Thus, the current study adopted a re-annotation method to identify lncRNAs associated with venous congestion (15).
Furthermore, increasing evidence has demonstrated that lncRNAs may be important for regulating gene expression. The functions of lncRNAs are predominantly performed by their secondary structures, however, this is difficult to decipher (17). Due to considerable challenges in investigating the lncRNA functions, a co-expression-based method was developed, in which lncRNA functions were predicted based on the functions of their co-expressed protein-coding genes (17), as genes with similar expression patterns under multiple conditions tend to be involved in the same pathways (18). The co-expressed protein-coding genes are potentially regulated by the corresponding lncRNAs.
Thus, in the current study, an Affymetrix microarray associated with peripheral venous congestion was re-annotated and normal and venous congestion co-expression networks were constructed (Fig. 2A and B). Based on these networks, another two networks were created; the 'lost' and 'obtained' networks. The 'lost' network represented the lncRNA-mRNA co-expression associations that occurred in the normal condition but disappeared in the venous congestion condition. By contrast, the 'obtained' network represented the novel lncRNA-mRNA co-expression associations that occurred in the venous congestion conditions, but were not present in the normal conditions. Then, GO enrichment was performed on the protein-coding mRNAs of the two networks. It was assumed that the GO terms of 'obtained' network represented 'novel' biological processes that were potentially influenced by lncRNAs, whereas the GO terms of the 'lost' network represented dysregulated biological processes that maintained the normal functions of the human body. Notably, numerous terms closely associated with venous congestion, including ion channel activity (19), were significantly enriched, suggesting that lncRNAs may be involved in similar biological processes by regulating the same mRNAs or different mRNAs in the same functional term (Tables I and II).
To decipher the dynamically regulated process during the development of venous congestion, the 'lost' and 'obtained' networks were combined to form the dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network (Fig. 4). The nodes with the highest degree are demonstrated in Tables III and IV. The most-connected mRNAs nodes were glutamate ionotropic receptor N-methyl D-aspartate 1 (GRIN1). It has been previously reported that the release of proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β in venous congestion condition enhanced GRIN1 responses through IL-1 receptor activation (20).
The current study also demonstrated that certain lncRNAs were 'dynamically' co-expressed with different mRNAs, and certain mRNAs were 'dynamically' co-expressed with different lncRNAs. To further investigate the dynamic biological pathways, a dynamic alternative pathway network was constructed (Fig. 5A). This demonstrated that there were certain pathways (for example, the pathway of 'dilated cardiomyopathy') directly associated with venous congestion or cardiovascular diseases (21). Furthermore, certain pathways, for example, hsa04020: calcium signaling pathway, were annotated by the 'lost' and 'obtained' mRNAs, suggesting that lncRNA dynamically regulate this pathway. The 'lost' and 'obtained' mRNAs and their corresponding lncRNAs were annotated to the calcium signaling pathway (Fig. 5B). G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were potentially regulated in the normal and venous congestion conditions, but by different lncRNAs (LINC01210 in venous congestion and RP11-435O5.5 in normal samples; Fig. 5B). A previous novel study demonstrated the importance of GPCR signaling partners in endothelial cell nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) function and the fundamental implications for vascular disorders involving dysregulated eNOS (22). In the normal samples, lncRNA-LINC00523 were co-expressed with PMCA, indicating the potential regulated association of LINC00523 with PMCA. However, in the venous congestion, this association was changed. LINC00523 were co-expressed with GPCRs. PMCA is a calcium pump, with a pivotal function in maintaining intracellular calcium homeostasis (23,24). Therefore, this observation indicated that, although further experimental validation is required, the dynamic regulated switch of LINC00523 from PMCA to GPCR may be involved in the damage to steady state intracellular calcium levels.
In the current study, the underlying role of lncRNAs in the development of venous congestion was investigated by the construction of a dynamic lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network. Functional analysis identified several dynamic alternative pathways, including the calcium signaling pathway. Notably, it was suggested that the dynamically regulated switch of LINC00523 from PMCA to GPCR may be involved in damage to the intracellular calcium homeostasis, leading to the development of venous congestion. In brief, the current study demonstrated a potential novel mechanism of lncRNA function during venous congestion.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the Health and Family Planning Commission of Heilongjiang Province [Grant Nos. 2012-357] and Health and Family Planning Commission of Heilongjiang Province [Grant Nos. 2013-110].
References
- 1.Gheorghiade M, Braunwald E. Reconsidering the role for digoxin in the management of acute heart failure syndromes. JAMA. 2009;302:2146–2147. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gheorghiade M, Pang PS. Acute heart failure syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:557–573. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Sato N, Kajimoto K, Keida T, Mizuno M, Takano T, ATTEND Investigators Prognostic impact of renal dysfunction does not differ according to the clinical profiles of patients: Insight from the acute decompensated heart failure syndromes (ATTEND) registry. PloS One. 2014;9:e105596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Colombo PC, Ganda A, Lin J, Onat D, Harxhi A, Iyasere JE, Uriel N, Cotter G. Inflammatory activation: Cardiac, renal and cardio-renal interactions in patients with the cardiorenal syndrome. Heart Fail Rev. 2012;17:177–190. doi: 10.1007/s10741-011-9261-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Colombo PC, Onat D, Harxhi A, Demmer RT, Hayashi Y, Jelic S, LeJemtel TH, Bucciarelli L, Kebschull M, Papapanou P, et al. Peripheral venous congestion causes inflammation, neurohormonal and endothelial cell activation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:448–454. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang BW, Chang H, Lin S, Kuan P, Shyu KG. Induction of matrix metalloproteinases-14 and -2 by cyclical mechanical stretch is mediated by tumor necrosis factor-alpha in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;59:460–469. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(03)00428-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Onat D, Jelic S, Schmidt AM, Pile-Spellman J, Homma S, Padeletti M, Jin Z, Le Jemtel TH, Colombo PC, Feng L. Vascular endothelial sampling and analysis of gene transcripts: A new quantitative approach to monitor vascular inflammation. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2007;103:1873–1878. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00367.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Colombo PC, Banchs JE, Celaj S, Talreja A, Lachmann J, Malla S, DuBois NB, Ashton AW, Latif F, Jorde UP, et al. Endothelial cell activation in patients with decompensated heart failure. Circulation. 2005;111:58–62. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151611.89232.3B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Mattick JS. Long non-coding RNAs: Insights into functions. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:155–159. doi: 10.1038/nrg2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang KC, Chang HY. Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2011;43:904–914. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Spizzo R, Almeida MI, Colombatti A, Calin GA. Long non-coding RNAs and cancer: A new frontier of translational research? Oncogene. 2012;31:4577–4587. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schonrock N, Harvey RP, Mattick JS. Long noncoding RNAs in cardiac development and pathophysiology. Circ Res. 2012;111:1349–1362. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.268953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ishii N, Ozaki K, Sato H, Mizuno H, Saito S, Takahashi A, Miyamoto Y, Ikegawa S, Kamatani N, Hori M, et al. Identification of a novel non-coding RNA, MIAT, that confers risk of myocardial infarction. J Hum Genet. 2006;51:1087–1099. doi: 10.1007/s10038-006-0070-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee JH, Gao C, Peng G, Greer C, Ren S, Wang Y, Xiao X. Analysis of transcriptome complexity through RNA sequencing in normal and failing murine hearts. Circ Res. 2011;109:1332–1341. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.249433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liao Q, Xiao H, Bu D, Xie C, Miao R, Luo H, Zhao G, Yu K, Zhao H, Skogerbø G, et al. ncFANs: A web server for functional annotation of long non-coding RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Web Server issue):W118–W124. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liao Q, Liu C, Yuan X, Kang S, Miao R, Xiao H, Zhao G, Luo H, Bu D, Zhao H, et al. Large-scale prediction of long non-coding RNA functions in a coding-non-coding gene co-expression network. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:3864–3878. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:14863–14868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Witthoft A, Filosa JA, Karniadakis GE. Potassium buffering in the neurovascular unit: Models and sensitivity analysis. Biophysical J. 2013;105:2046–2054. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu T, Jiang CY, Fujita T, Luo SW, Kumamoto E. Enhancement by interleukin-1b of AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated currents in adult rat spinal superficial dorsal horn neurons. Mol Pain. 2013;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-9-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Young R, Worthley LI. Current concepts in the management of heart failure. Crit Care Resusc. 2004;6:31–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu S, Premont RT, Rockey DC. G-protein-coupled receptor kinase interactor-1 (GIT1) is a new endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) interactor with functional effects on vascular homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:12309–12320. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.320465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cicek FA, Ozgur EO, Ozgur E, Ugur M. The interplay between plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) ATPases in agonist-induced temporal Ca(2+) dynamics. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2014;46:503–510. doi: 10.1007/s10863-014-9587-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Roy N, Chakraborty S, Paul Chowdhury B, Banerjee S, Halder K, Majumder S, Majumdar S, Sen PC. Regulation of PKC mediated signaling by calcium during visceral leishmaniasis. PloS One. 2014;9:e110843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]