Highlights
-
•
The effects of maternal smoking on the term placental proteome was studied.
-
•
Maternal smoking significantly affected 18% of protein spots.
-
•
Maternal smoking affects systems controlling the development and function of placenta.
-
•
The observed placental changes may contribute to the lowered birth weights.
Keywords: Foetus, Maternal smoking, Metabolism, Placenta, Proteomics, Steroid hormones
Abstract
Detrimental effects of maternal smoking on the term placental proteome and steroid-metabolizing activities, and maternal hormone levels, were studied by using seven non-smoker and seven smoker placentae. Smoking significantly affected 18% of protein spots. The functional networks affected were i) cell morphology, cellular assembly and organization, cellular compromise (15 hits) and ii) DNA replication, recombination, and repair, energy production, nucleic acid metabolism (6 hits). Smoking significantly up-regulated such proteins as, SERPINA1, EFHD1 and KRT8; and down-regulated SERPINB2, FGA and HBB. Although maternal plasma steroids were not significantly altered, the catalytic activity of CYP1A1 was increased whereas CYP19A1 activity was reduced by smoking. Furthermore, transcript expression of CYP1A1 and CYP4B1 were induced while HSD17B2, NFKB and TGFB1 were repressed by smoking. The observed smoking induced wide-spread changes on placental proteome and transcript levels may contribute to the lowered birth weights of the new-born child and placenta.
1. Introduction
Tobacco smoke contains over >7000 [1] harmful substances that can have direct effects on placental and foetal cell proliferation and differentiation. Many of these substances, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, readily pass through the placental barrier into the foetal compartment [2]. Maternal smoking increases the risk of miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, placenta praevia and foetal orofacial clefts in early pregnancy and foetal growth restriction, placental insufficiency, placental abruption, premature rupture of placental membranes and preterm delivery in late pregnancy [3], [4]. Long-term, prenatal exposure to smoking is a major risk factor for respiratory ailments in children [5], and it may impair their innate and adaptive immunity [6]. In addition, the risks for childhood and adulthood obesity [7], cardiovascular disease [8] and impaired fertility [9] in the offspring are increased by maternal smoking.
Xenobiotic-induced oxidative stress, including maternal smoking, results in placental-associated syndromes and structural changes in placenta, such as increased villous mesenchymal collagen content, trophoblastic membrane thickening, decreased vascularization, villous arteriole oedema and basal plate calcification [3]. Such alterations can result in impaired trophoblast proliferation, differentiation and regulation, as well as disturbed mRNA transcript levels and altered activities of xenobiotic and steroid metabolizing enzymes [10], [11]. This highlights the need for a systematic analysis of placental proteins altered by maternal smoking. In addition, since the term placenta is one of the few tissues that can be used to assess the developmental environment of the newborn child, it would be of considerable value if markers of placental xenotoxicant exposure could be identified.
In this proof of concept study, we selected a 2-D gel approach to enable us to also examine isoform changes, which have functional implications, as well as expression changes in placental proteins following smoke-exposure, as previously published for the human foetal liver [12].
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Human placental tissue
Fourteen full-term human placentae were obtained, with approval of the local ethic committee, from Kuopio University Hospital, Finland and conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Maternal smoking was confirmed with a questionnaire during pregnancy and confirmed by measurement of maternal cotinine levels using a liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC–MS) method with a lower sensitivity of 2 ng/ml [13]. Activities associated with the diagnostic placental enzymes 7-ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase (ECOD) and 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD) were determined as a measure of smoking-induced cytochrome P450 subfamily 1A1 (CYP1A1) activity. All placentae, except for three non-smoker placentae, were obtained from vaginal deliveries and were collected immediately after delivery. After delivery, connective tissue and coagulated blood were removed from the placenta and placental tissue was rinsed in cold saline solution. Small pieces (5–10 g) including the central area of the placenta were excised, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. For 2-D gel proteomics, equal amounts of protein from each individual placenta were pooled according to maternal smoking status and then four replicate gels were electrophoresed for each groups separately. For 1-D gels and Western blot, all 14 samples were electrophoresed individually in separate lanes.
2.2. Measurement of placental enzyme activity
EROD activity was measured to determine the induction of CYP1A1 according to Burke et al. [14]. The activity of ECOD was measured as a general marker for placental CYP-associated activities using the method of Greenlee and Poland [15]. Aromatase (AROM) activity was measured to determine CYP19A1 steroid-metabolizing activity by the method of Pasanen [16]. Microsomal UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) activity was measured using the fluorescent microplate method [17] while glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity was measured by the method of Habig et al. [18].
2.3. Quantification of serum steroid hormones
Ten maternal steroid hormones (oestrone, testosterone, androstenedione, androstanedione, dehydroepiandrosterone, dihydrotestosterone, progesterone, pregnenolone, 17-OH-progesterone and 17-OH-pregnenolone) were quantified in whole blood samples collected at delivery using a validated liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method [19].
2.4. Extraction of total RNA
Total RNA was extracted with a GenElute Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) or with a Qiagen AllPrep mini kit (Qiagen Ltd., Crawley, UK) followed by DNase treatment (Ambion Turbo DNA-Free Kit, Ambion/Life Technologies, USA). The quantity of RNA was analysed with a NanoVue (GE Healthcare, USA) spectrophotometer and the integrity was monitored by gel electrophoresis. The total RNA was stored at −80 °C.
2.5. Extraction of protein
Proteins were extracted from placentae with a Qiagen AllPrep DNA/RNA/Protein mini kit (Qiagen Ltd., Crawley, UK), see Ref. [20]. Tissues were homogenized following the manufacturer’s instructions with two main modifications: (i) the addition of protease inhibitors (Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd., Gillingham, UK) to the lysis buffer (RLT) to maximize protein integrity and yield and (ii) the re-suspension of protein pellets in Modified Reswell Solution [21]. Reproducibility of protein recovery and quality is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1.
2.6. Quantitative real-time PCR
cDNA was synthesized with the First-Strand cDNA synthesis technique (M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase, Fermentas/Thermo Scientific, USA) and 2 μg of total RNA was used in each synthesis. Real-time PCR was performed using Taqman primer probe sets (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies, USA) or SYBR (Brilliant II, Agilent technologies). Gene expression was normalized with β-actin (ACTB) and each sample were measured in triplicate. The commercial probes and primers used are presented in Supplementary Table 1.
2.7. Proteomics
For small-scale or proof of concept studies where proteomics is used, we have found that pooling samples to build-in biological variation, with quadruplicate gel electrophoresis to contribute the technical variation is a successful design. Therefore, protein pools, to which individual placentae contributed equally in term of protein quantity, were prepared for each experimental group and soluble proteins separated by 2-DE in quadruplicate using commercial 7 cm gels, as previously described [21]. The gels were stained with Colloidal Coomassie Brilliant Blue, scanned and analysed with Progenesis SameSpots software, V6.01 (Nonlinear Dynamics, Newcastle, UK). The software was used to combine the gel quadruplicates and to calculate fold-changes and significance. Briefly, a single reference gel for the whole experiment was selected from one of the four control gels (Fig. 1A), based on image quality, this also served as the reference gel for the control group while the highest quality gel in the smoking group served as the reference gel for that group. Spots around the edge of the gel were excluded and spots were detected based on all detected spots in all 8 gels followed by automatic alignment, first to reference gels for each group separately and then to the experiment reference gel. The alignments were checked manually and poorly matched spots within groups were excluded from the analysis. Additional manual editing was not required. Spots on all gels were normalised (no gels were excluded from the analysis) using the automatic normalisation routine of the software (see http://totallab.com/samespots-technical-details/for further information). Spots with fold-differences of ≥1.2-fold at p < 0.05 were included in the overall analysis. Differentially-expressed protein spots were selected for spot cutting once statistical significance (provided within SameSpots by ANOVA of log-normalised spot volumes) had been independently verified by the authors (see Statistical Analysis below) and all were consistently expressed across all 8 gels with fold-differences of ≥1.5-fold at p < 0.05. Molecular masses and pI values of spots of interest were estimated from separate gels electrophoresed with pH and MW markers. Proteins in the gel pieces were digested with trypsin and analysed see Ref. [21] for details. Mass lists in the form of Mascot Generic Files were created automatically and used as the input for Mascot MS/MS Ions searches of the NCBInr database using the Matrix Science web server (www.matrixscience.com). The default search parameters used were: Enzyme = Trypsin, Max. Missed cleavages = 1; Fixed modifications = Carbamidomethyl (C); Variable modifications = Oxidation (M); Peptide tolerance ± 1.5 Da; MS/MS tolerance ± 0.5 Da; Peptide charge = 2+ and 3+; Instrument = ESI-TRAP. Statistically significant MOWSE scores and good sequence coverage were considered to be positive identifications.
2.8. 1-D gel electrophoresis and 1-D and 2-D western blot
Individual (n = 7/group) placental protein extracts were electrophoresed (30 μg protein/lane) on 26-lane 1-DE 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen Ltd, Paisley, UK) under reducing conditions (MOPS buffer, Invitrogen) [20], [21]. The same pooled placental protein samples as used for proteomics (section 2.7 above) were also used to generate additional 2-D gels. Both 1-D and 2-D gels were transferred to Immobilon™-FL membranes (Millipore (UK) Ltd, Watford, UK) as described previously [20], [21]. Odyssey Two-Colour Protein Molecular Weight Markers (LI-COR Biosciences UK Ltd, Cambridge, UK) were electrophoresed in 3 lanes of every gel. The membranes were blocked (1 h, room temperature) with (Odyssey Blocking Buffer, 927–4000: LICOR +PBS) and were incubated with primary antibodies (diluted in blocking buffer + PBST) at 4 °C overnight: (i) Transgelin (TAGLN2) 0.001 μg/ml, goat, AHP2034, ABD Serotec, Kidlington, Oxfordshire, UK; (ii) Carbonic anhydrase-1 (CA1) 1:1000, mouse, H00000759-A01, Abnova, Stratech Scientific Ltd, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK; (iii) Peroxiredoxin-1 (PRDX1) 1:500, rabbit, PA0007, LabFrontier, no longer available; (iv) Alpha-1-antitrypsin (SERPINA1) 1:500, rabbit, HPA00129, Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd, Gillingham, Dorset, UK. Membranes were also immuno-stained with an anti-ACTB (anti β-actin) load control from a different species (1:5000, mouse, ab8226, Abcam Plc, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK or 1:10000, rabbit A5060, Sigma-Aldrich). IRDye® infrared secondary antibodies were supplied by LI-COR. Protein bands were visualized using the LI-COR Odyssey® Infrared Imaging System and the resulting electronic images were analysed using TotalLab TL120 software (v2008.1; Nonlinear Dynamics Ltd, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK) to determine the molecular weights and band volumes. The band volumes of ACTB were compared between groups to check the validity of this load control for placentae from the non-smoking and smoking groups. 1-D load control SDS PAGE gel of all placental protein extracts studied is presented in Supplementary Fig. 1.
2.9. Statistical and pathway analysis
Statistical significance of demographic, biochemical and hormonal data was carried out by Mann-Whitney U-test and data are presented as mean ± SD, and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The normality of proteomic data distribution was tested with the Shapiro-Wilk test and where distribution of data was skewed, they were log-transformed prior to analysis or analysed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test. The 1-DE Western blot band volumes (normalized relative to ACTB expression separate for each lane) and normalized spot volumes (% of total spot volume for each gel separately) were compared in control and smoke-exposed groups, using one-way ANOVA. Statistically significant differences in log-transformed, normalized volumes were an important determinant of the spots selected for identification by LC/MS-MS. Unless otherwise stated, data are presented as mean ± SEM. Where fold-changes are presented, a positive value indicates an increase, and a negative value is a reduction, relative to controls. Proteins and transcripts exhibiting treatment-specific alterations in expression were analysed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, Ingenuity Systems, http://www.ingenuity.com), as described previously [12], [21], [22].
3. Results
3.1. The weights of newborns were reduced by maternal smoking
The mean birth weight of neonates was significantly (p < 0.01) reduced in the smoking group compared with those in the non-smoking group (Table 1). In the smoking group, a non-significant trend (p = 0.165) for reduced placental weight was observed. Women were significantly younger (p < 0.05) in the smoking group compared to the non-smoking group (Table 1).
Table 1.
Variable | Non-smokersa | Smokersa | p-Valueb |
---|---|---|---|
Maternal age (years) | 32.14 ± 6.28 | 26.00 ± 3.74 | 0.026* |
Number of previous pregnancies | 2.43 ± 0.53 | 2.14 ± 1.07 | 0.456 |
Duration of pregnancy (weeks) | 39.65 ± 0.66 | 39.21 ± 1.60 | 1.000 |
Birth weight (g) | 3719.29 ± 196.86 | 3202.50 ± 309.38 | 0.002** |
Placental weight (g) | 680.83 ± 63.12 | 588.57 ± 73.35 | 0.165 |
Non-smokers = 4 male, 3 female; Smokers = 7 males.
As determined by Mann-Whitney U test, Values are shown as mean ± SD. Non-smokers vs. smokers.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
3.2. Maternal smoking alters placental metabolizing enzyme activity
In the smoking group, placental enzyme activities ECOD and EROD were significantly induced (p < 0.01) and AROM levels significantly repressed (p < 0.05) compared to the non-smoking group (Table 2). However, GST and UGT were not altered. A significant increase was observed in placental mRNA transcript levels of CYP1A1 and CYP4B1 (Table 3) in the smoking group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively).
Table 2.
Variable | Non-smokers (n = 7) | Smokers (n = 7) | p-valuea |
---|---|---|---|
Blood cotinine (ng/ml) | <2.00b | 51.51 ± 26.94 (16.78–96.84) |
– |
EROD (pmol*mg/min) | 0.30 ± 0.34 (0.02–0.78) |
151.28 ± 180.56 (1.77–516.28) |
0.001** |
ECOD (pmol*mg/min) | 5.50 ± 4.14 (1.93–13.86) |
297.38 ± 264.79 (13.02–782.60) |
0.001** |
AROM (pmol*mg/min) | 33.01 ± 7.28 (22.05–45.28) |
27.78 ± 31.36 (10.84–98.26) |
0.026* |
GST (nmol*mg/min) | 178.89 ± 36.45 (126.19–219.25) |
230.41 ± 85.89 (183.98–418.27) |
0.209 |
UGT (pmol*mg/min) | 5.00 ± 1.38 (3.66–7.28) |
5.37 ± 1.89 (3.65–8.69) |
0.902 |
Values are shown as mean ± SD and range in brackets below.
EROD = 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase, ECOD = 7-ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase, AROM = aromatase, GST = glutathione S-transferase, UGT = uridine 5′-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase.
As determined by Mann-Whitney U test.
Below limit of quantitation. Non-smokers vs. smokers.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
Table 3.
Gene | Non-smokers | Smokers | p-valuea |
---|---|---|---|
Xenosensors | |||
AHR | 1 ± 0.29 | 1.98 ± 0.42 | 0.701 |
Endocrine receptors | |||
KISSR | 1 ± 0.44 | 0.89 ± 0.42 | 1.000 |
Steroidogenic enzymes | |||
AKR1C3 | 1 ± 0.49 | 1.44 ± 0.81 | 0.523 |
CYP11A1 | 1 ± 0.49 | 0.49 ± 0.45 | 0.702 |
CYP19A1 | 1 ± 0.54 | 0.66 ± 0.71 | 0.259 |
HSD3B1 | 1 ± 0.50 | 0.90 ± 0.60 | 0.710 |
HSD3B2 | 1 ± 0.43 | 1.13 ± 0.47 | 0.898 |
HSD11B2 | 1 ± 0.37 | 0.54 ± 0.65 | 0.097 |
HSD17B1 | 1 ± 0.66 | 0.29 ± 0.38 | 0.702 |
HSD17B2 | 1 ± 0.32 | 0.15 ± 0.37 | 0.048 |
HSD17B6 | 1 ± 0.77 | 1.44 ± 0.81 | 0.705 |
POR | 1 ± 0.47 | 0.43 ± 0.60 | 0.710 |
Phase I enzymes | |||
CYP1A1 | 1 ± 0.64 | 142.86 ± 0.95 | 0.001 |
CYP2B6 | 1 ± 0.76 | 0.26 ± 0.58 | 0.898 |
CYP4B1 | 1 ± 0.63 | 6.88 ± 1.45 | 0.026 |
CBR1 | 1 ± 0.48 | 0.83 ± 0.54 | 0.535 |
EPHX1 | 1 ± 0.54 | 3.37 ± 0.49 | 0.201 |
Phase II enzymes | |||
GSTA1 | 1 ± 0.59 | 1.69 ± 0.67 | 0.701 |
GSTP1 | 1 ± 0.28 | 3.21 ± 0.48 | 0.159 |
GSTT1 | 1 ± 0.54 | 0.60 ± 0.53 | 0.798 |
NQO1 | 1 ± 0.95 | 5.73 ± 0.71 | 0.201 |
Other pathways | |||
GGT1 | 1 ± 0.96 | 0.01 ± 0.32 | 0.203 |
SERPINA1 | 1 ± 0.52 | 2.59 ± 0.46 | 0.250 |
TGFB1 | 1 ± 0.28 | 0.28 ± 0.40 | 0.046 |
FOS | 1 ± 0.40 | 0.58 ± 0.25 | 0.999 |
NFKB | 1 ± 0.42 | 0.22 ± 0.27 | 0.047 |
WISP2 | 1 ± 0.33 | 1.10 ± 0.35 | 0.818 |
CEBPB | 1 ± 0.50 | 0.36 ± 0.34 | 0.798 |
IGF1 | 1 ± 0.70 | 0.10 ± 0.56 | 0.250 |
IGF2 | 1 ± 0.30 | 1.17 ± 0.25 | 0.688 |
Values are transformed to relative expression ± SEM. Percentual expressions were calculated by comparing smokers against non-smoker expressions, assuming that non-smoker expressions are 1.
As determined by ANOVA.
3.3. Smoking has little effect on maternal plasma steroid hormone levels
Maternal plasma steroid hormone concentrations demonstrated a wide inter-individual variation without any significant alterations between the smoking and non-smoking groups (Table 4). In the smoking group one mother displayed, low estrogen and progestogen levels, and exceptionally high androgen levels although her placental AROM activity was similar to the others. Of the 10 steroidogenic enzyme transcripts quantified (Table 3), only hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 17B2 (HSD17B2) displayed a significantly decreased expression in the smoking group (p < 0.05).
Table 4.
Hormone | Non-smokers (n = 7) | Smokers (n = 7) | p-valuea |
---|---|---|---|
Estrone | 119.98 ± 56.90 (44.36–216.10) |
135.44 ± 88.45 (21.96–248.41) |
0.710 |
Testosterone | 0.23 ± 0.13 (0.076–0.385) |
0.65 ± 1.07 (0.082–3.042) |
0.535 |
Androstenedione | 3.18 ± 0.59 (2.23–3.87) |
4.76 ± 4.92 (1.16–15.68) |
0.805 |
Androstanedione | <1.33b | <1.33b | – |
Dehydroepiandrosterone | 8.16 ± 3.13 (5.15–13.40) |
12.66 ± 5.63 (5.15–21.28) |
0.165 |
Dihydrotestosterone | <0.325b | <0.325b | – |
Progesterone | 3189.35 ± 1795.52 (1036.93–5740.57) |
3005.66 ± 1179.88 (493.65–4305.20) |
1.000 |
Pregnenolone | 97.49 ± 27.46 (50.66–127.96) |
109.74 ± 45.92 (17.99–167.78) |
0.535 |
17α-Hydroxyprogesterone | 81.66 ± 56.06 (35.83–184.28) |
79.74 ± 45.13 (29.61–164.53) |
1.000 |
17α-Hydroxypregnenolone | 12.19 ± 4.44 (5.24–19.45) |
18.62 ± 10.73 (5.45–32.00) |
0.209 |
Values are shown as mean ± SD and range in brackets below. All units of variables are nM.
As determined by Mann-Whitney U test.
Below limit of quantitation.
3.4. The placental proteome is disturbed by maternal smoking
Maternal smoking significantly affected 72 protein spots (p < 0.05, ≥1.2-fold change) out of 392 protein spots included in the study (based on quality criteria of size and reproducibility). Maternal smoking increased 27 and decreased 45 protein spot volumes (Fig. 1A). Sixteen of the most altered and consistent of these protein spots were identified by using LC–MS/MS (Table 5). Because protein spots can contain more than one protein and different protein isoforms may have different migration patterns [22], selected proteins with likely roles in the placenta were further analysed by Western blot. Maternal smoking significantly increased the cleaved (48 kDA) form of α-1-antitrypsin (SERPINA1) but not the 55 kDa full-length protein or transcript (Fig. 1B, C). Vimentin (VIM) was identified in two protein spots, which had significantly increased spot volumes in the smoking group (Table 5 and Fig. 1D). In the 2-D Western blot of VIM the antibody used marginally overlapped with the spots in blue in Fig. 1D. Therefore, VIM is a minor component of spot # 2047 and 2048 (Fig. 1D, peptide intensity ration 2.30:1.00 in favour of SERPINA1) and, in contrast, immunodetected VIM protein was significantly decreased (Fig. 1E). A non-significant trend for decreasing immune-detectable protein expression of carbonic anhydrase 1 (CA1), peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1) and transgelin 2 (TAGLN2) was observed among smokers (Fig. 2), similar to the proteomics findings (Table 5). By using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), the proteomic findings shown in Table 5 were mapped to two networks: I) Cell Morphology, Cellular Assembly and Organization, Cellular Compromise (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 2) and II) DNA Replication, Recombination, and Repair, Energy Production, Nucleic Acid Metabolism (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 2). These pathways mapped to toxicological and biological functions shown in Supplementary Table 3 and included liver function and disease and cell death, survival and function. Canonical pathways in the term human placental proteome affected by maternal smoking (Supplementary Fig. 2) include several detoxification and metabolic pathways as well as signalling and blood function pathways. Based on the pathway analysis, eight mRNA transcripts associated with placental consequences of smoking, intra-uterine growth restriction, or with SERPINA1, were quantified by qPCR. Among the transcripts measured (Table 3 “other pathways”), only nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated beta cells (NFKB) and transforming growth factor, beta 1 (TGFB1) were statistically significantly decreased.
Table 5.
Spot # | Gene symbol | Protein name | Accession # | Fold-change | p-valuea | MW | pI | MOWSE Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Network 1: Cell Morphology, Cellular Assembly and Organization, Cellular Compromise | ||||||||
118 | SERPINB2 | Plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 | NP_002566 | −1.9 | 0.041 | 46.8 | 5.46 | 528 |
1828 | SERPINA1 | Alpha-1-antitrypsin | NP_000286 | −1.5 | 0.035 | 46.9 | 5.37 | 974 |
2047b | SERPINA1 | Alpha-1-antitrypsin (or S variant) | 1QMB_A | +1.8 | 0.004 | 36.6 | 5.44 | 1086 |
1077 | SERPINA1 | Alpha-1-antitrypsin | AAH15642 | +1.8 | <0.001 | 39.1 | 5.27 | 942 |
2048b | SERPINA1 | Alpha-1-antitrypsin | AAB59495 | +1.6 | 0.016 | 46.8 | 5.43 | 716 |
1468b | PPIB | Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase B | AAA52150 | −1.5 | 0.008 | 22.8 | 9.33 | 309 |
1487b | PRDX1 | Peroxiredoxin 1 | NP_002565 | −1.5 | 0.036 | 22.3 | 8.27 | 480 |
1468b | FGA | Fibrinogen alpha chain | 0501249A | −1.5 | 0.008 | 26.6 | 9.08 | 444 |
1470 | FGA | Fibrinogen alpha chain | 0501249A | −1.7 | 0.002 | 26.6 | 9.08 | 425 |
2047b | VIM | Vimentin | AAA61279 | +1.8 | 0.004 | 53.7 | 5.03 | 426 |
2048b | VIM | Vimentin | AAA61279 | +1.6 | 0.016 | 53.7 | 5.03 | 724 |
1793 | COL1A1 | Collagen alpha 1(I) Chain | AAH36531 | −1.5 | 0.005 | 139.9 | 5.70 | 187 |
2105d | COL1A1 | Collagen alpha 1(I) Chain | AAH36531 | −1.6 | <0.001 | 140.0 | 5.70 | 125 |
1966 | KRT8 | KRT8 protein | AAH11373 | +1.5 | 0.017 | 41.1 | 4.94 | 582 |
1107 | KRT18 | KRT18 protein, cytoskeletal | CAA31377 | −1.5 | <0.001 | 47.3 | 5.27 | 1337 |
Network 2: DNA Replication, Recombination, and Repair, Energy Production, Nucleic Acid Metabolism | ||||||||
1342 | PNP | Purine nucleoside phosphorylase | NP_000261 | −1.6 | <0.001 | 32.3 | 6.45 | 684 |
1379 | CA1 | Carbonic anhydrase 1 | NP_001729 | −1.5 | 0.004 | 28.9 | 6.59 | 617 |
1468b | ATP5F1 | ATP synthase subunit b, mitochondoral | AAH05960 | −1.5 | 0.008 | 28.9 | 9.45 | 218 |
1487b | TAGLN2 | Transgelin-2 | NP_003555 | −1.5 | 0.036 | 22.5 | 8.41 | 450 |
1969c | HBB | Hemoglobin subunit beta | 2DXM_D | −2.6 | 0.032 | 15.9 | 6.55 | 643 |
1349 | EFHD1 | EF-hand domain-containing protein D1 | NP_079479 | +1.6 | 0.004 | 27.0 | 5.34 | 408 |
As determined using log-normalized spot volumes.
More than one protein highly likely to be in the spot.
Poor gel match with MW and pI but sequence coverage of 94% and an ion score of 21 suggests an accurate identification.
Poor sequence coverage and gel MW match.
4. Discussion
In this study, placental proteins relating to two main functional protein networks (i: Cell Morphology, Cellular Assembly and Organization, Cellular Compromise; ii: DNA Replication, Recombination, and Repair, Energy Production, Nucleic Acid Metabolism) were significantly affected by maternal smoking in the human term placentae. The protein affected included constructs of haemoglobin subunits and protective proteases (e.g. SERPINA1) and proteins directly involved in cellular structure or carbon dioxide metabolism.
SERPINA1 is a protease inhibitor that belongs to the serine proteinase (serpin) superfamily and protects against inflammatory cells initiated cell damage [24]. In addition, there are multiple forms of SERPINA1, which are associated with the expression of the different pro-inflammatory molecules [25]. In the present study, the expression of the cleaved 48 kDa form of SERPINA1 (NP_000286) protein was significantly lower in the smoking group compared to non-smoking group (fold-change −1.5). However, maternal smoking significantly increased (fold-change +1.6 to +1.8) expression levels of three other SERPINA1 protein variants (1QMB_A, AAH15642 and AAB59495). This suggests that maternal smoking can disturb transcript splicing in placenta. According to the literature there are contradictory data based on placental SERPINA1 protein expression levels. This is due to the differences in risk factors for pregnancy: SERPINA1 was increased in placentas of obese mothers [26] and decreased in preeclamptic mothers [27]. SERPINA1 is increased in the lung and sputum of smokers [28], which, together with our data and known effects of smoking on the placenta [29], suggests that specific SERPINA1 isoforms could serve as a biomarker for oxidative stress. It is also possible that the alterations in placental SERPINA1 expression levels reflect responses to external stress factors and, therefore, could reflect the overall maturation process or well-being of the foeto-placental unit. Strikingly, our data showed good agreement with a recently published study on the effects of growth restriction on the human placenta in which SERPINA1 was increased and SERPINB2 decreased [30]. The identification of multiple proteins in other spots (e.g. #1468) and their isoforms (e.g. VIM) will require follow-up in further studies because of the potential functional importance of these differences [23].
Other placental proteins affected by maternal smoking included carbonic anhydrase 1 (CA1), haemoglobin subunit β (HBB) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 (SERPINB2). The expression of SERPINB2 protein was significantly decreased in the placentae of smokers. Biologically SERPINB2 is a coagulation factor produced in the human placenta. It inactivates urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) [31]. In line with our data, SERPINB2 transcript was significantly down-regulated in a study performed with umbilical cords of maternal smokers [32]. Potentially, the down-regulation of SERPINB2 will lead to increased risk for haemorrhage during pregnancy. As a consequence, this may increase risk for gestational complications such as placental abruption in smokers.
HBB expression was reduced significantly in the placentae from smoking women. Lower levels of proteins associated with haemoglobin synthesis could lead to inadequate oxygen transfer to the foetus and increase risk of intrauterine oxygen depletion and foetal growth retardation seen in maternal smoking. Similarly, placentae from severe preeclamptic mothers have demonstrated comparable decrease in haemoglobin–β-chain levels [27]. In contrast, HBB, HBA and HBG levels were significantly elevated in proteomic studies of: (i) cord blood from maternal smokers [33] and (ii) the effects of growth restriction on the human placenta [30]. Carbonic anhydrases are key components in transporting carbon dioxide from tissues to circulation, and maintaining the acid-base balance in tissues. Therefore, the significant reduction in placental levels of CA1 combined with the repressed synthesis of haemoglobin subunits in the smoking group would be expected to exert synergistic effects leading to impaired oxygen supply and acid-base imbalance.
Levels of transcripts identified by IPA analysis of the smoking-responsive placental proteome, specifically those encoding NFKB and TGFB1, were significantly decreased in the placenta by maternal smoking. Oxidative stress is usually associated with increased NFKB, which also mediates responses to hypoxia and up-regulates cellular responses to inflammation in placental cells [34]. Failure of NFKB levels to increase in placentae from maternal smokers may limit the ability of the placenta to protect itself from the outcomes rising from the oxidative stress [35]. However, this will require further study due to the occurrence of at least two NFKB isoforms. TGFB1 is a multifunctional cytokine that regulates placental trophoblast cell proliferation and differentiation, and hormone production [36]. A decrease in transcript levels has, therefore, the potential to affect several aspects of placental function and growth and to increase the risk of placental insufficiency.
Maternal smoking also affected several intra-cellular structure-related members of the placental proteome. Significant decreases in the levels of collagen (COL1A1), fibrinogen (FBA), keratin (KRT18), and VIM (the latter measured by Western blot) occurred if the mother smoked. The expression changes in these specific placental structural proteins may reflect growth restriction, structural and functional consequences, e.g. placental abruption, insufficiency, premature rupture of placental membranes and preterm delivery [3]. VIM is a component of the cytoskeleton, which is required to maintain cellular integrity and its expression levels were altered in women suffering preterm labour [37]. However, in the current study no difference was seen in terms of pregnancy duration between smoking and non-smoking mothers.
Maternal smoking altered several functional enzyme activities in the placental samples (Table 3). The placental monooxygenase activities, EROD and ECOD, were both induced among smokers’ placentae probably by constituents of the cigarette smoke [10]. CYP19A1 activity was also decreased in the smokers’ placentae [38], which could lead to reduced placental oestrogen synthesis capacity and housekeeping functions. Maternal smoking also led to an induction of CYP1A1 and CYP4B1 mRNA levels and a repression of CYP19A1 mRNA levels. These findings agree with our previous study [10], although gross CYP1A1 and CYP19A1 protein levels were not significantly altered in our Western blot analysis (data not shown). Among the hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases, the mRNA of HSD17B2 was repressed in the smoker group. HSD17B2 converts testosterone to androstenedione, estradiol to estrone, and 20-alpha-dihydroprogesterone to progesterone. In human placenta HSD17B2 is located in the endothelial cells lining the foetal compartment. It has been hypothesized that HSD17B2 acts as a barrier to reduce the rate of estradiol secretion into the foetal circulation [39] and it is possible, therefore, that maternal smoking alters circulating foetal estradiol levels. This is supported by our recent publication demonstrating significantly increased second trimester estrogen levels in human foetal plasma [40]. The maternal serum steroid hormone levels displayed wide inter-individual variations in both of the studied groups. Despite the changes observed in the placental hormone metabolism no significant alterations were detected in maternal serum steroid hormone levels, although cigarette smoking has been demonstrated to affect maternal steroid hormone levels and reduce estriol levels in the cord blood [41].
All pregnancies included in the present study were classified as clinically “normal” and resulted in healthy babies and none of the women underwent long-term medication during gestation. When the smoking and non-smoking groups were analysed, foetal sex was added as a covariate and there were no significant interactions between foetal sex and maternal smoking for any of the reported data. Sample size in this study was small but was sufficient to confirm the epidemiological findings that maternal smoking was associated with lower birth weights [4]. One limitation of the study is that the women were significantly younger in the smoking group compared to non-smoking group. In general, smoking mothers are younger than non-smokers as demonstrated in the USA where 20% of pregnant women aged <25 years smoke and 9% of those aged >35 years [42]. Our data agrees with the previous findings that the mean placental weight was reduced in the smoker group [43]. However, also maternal age may influence placental weight or morphometry [44]. The changes observed in the present proteomic analysis will not directly reflect to the weight or size or histology of placenta as reported in other studies [45]. Nonetheless our data support the working hypothesis that maternal smoking affects multiple fundamental cellular systems controlling the growth, development and function of placenta. This is emphasized in Supplementary Table 3 where the biological functions with the largest number of members with overlapping proteins identified in the present study were found in the categories of cell growth, survival, movement and death. One caveat of course is that by looking at the term placenta we cannot determine when over the 9 months of pregnancy, the changes in placental function occurred. This does not reduce the importance of studying the term placenta both due to its own intrinsic biomedical importance and because it is a readily accessible product of conception that can act as a cumulative read-out for the whole of gestation.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, based on the literature, altogether 4239 proteins have been identified in human placental tissue, covering around 21% of the human proteome [46]. In the present study we show that maternal smoking significantly affected term placental levels of at least 70 proteins. The two functional protein networks affected were: (1) cell morphology, cellular assembly and organization; (2) DNA replication, recombination, and repair, energy production, nucleic acid metabolism. The clinical significance of increased SERPINA1 expression among smokers’ placentae is not known but its known functions suggest significant deviation in placental function in cigarette smoking women. The changes described at the placental proteome and transcript levels may reflect the increased oxidative stress due to maternal smoking, resulting in lowered birth weight of a new born child and placenta. Based on the concept, developmental origin of diseases, it remains unresolved whether the maternal smoking-induced placental proteomic changes reflect to the wellbeing or morbidity of children later in life.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Transparency document
Acknowledgements
This paper belongs to the studies carried out by Kuopio Birth Cohort consortium (www.KuBiCo.fi). We thank Ms Pirjo Hänninen for expert laboratory assistance at University of Eastern Finland, Ms Margaret Fraser, Dr Panagiotis Filis and the Proteomics Core Facility at the University of Aberdeen for their expert assistance. We also thank the staff of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Kuopio University Hospital for skilful collection of these specimens. This work was supported by the Academy of Finland [122859/2007], the Helena Vuorenmies Foundation, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, the University of Eastern Finland Doctoral Programme in Drug Research and the Medical Research Council, UK [MR/L010011/1]. The funders played no roles in study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript preparation and/or publication decisions.
Footnotes
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.05.009.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following are Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Rodgman A., Perfetti T.A. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; Boca Raton (FL): 2009. The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Karttunen V., Myllynen P., Prochazka G., Pelkonen O., Segerback D., Vahakangas K. Placental transfer and DNA binding of benzo(a)pyrene in human placental perfusion. Toxicol. Lett. 2010;197:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jauniaux E., Burton G.J. Morphological and biological effects of maternal exposure to tobacco smoke on the feto-placental unit. Early Hum. Dev. 2007;83:699–706. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Salihu H.M., Wilson R.E. Epidemiology of prenatal smoking and perinatal outcomes. Early Hum. Dev. 2007;83:713–720. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hylkema M.N., Blacquiere M.J. Intrauterine effects of maternal smoking on sensitization, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2009;6:660–662. doi: 10.1513/pats.200907-065DP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sopori M. Effects of cigarette smoke on the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2:372–377. doi: 10.1038/nri803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Riedel C., Schonberger K., Yang S., Koshy G., Chen Y.C., Gopinath B. Parental smoking and childhood obesity: higher effect estimates for maternal smoking in pregnancy compared with paternal smoking-a meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2014;43:1593–1606. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hafstrom O., Milerad J., Sandberg K.L., Sundell H.W. Cardiorespiratory effects of nicotine exposure during development. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2005;149:325–341. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2005.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Virtanen H.E., Sadov S., Toppari J. Prenatal exposure to smoking and male reproductive health. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2012;19:228–232. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3283537cb8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huuskonen P., Storvik M., Reinisalo M., Honkakoski P., Rysa J., Hakkola J. Microarray analysis of the global alterations in the gene expression in the placentas from cigarette-smoking mothers. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008;83:542–550. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Suter M., Ma J., Harris A., Patterson L., Brown K.A., Shope C. Maternal tobacco use modestly alters correlated epigenome-wide placental DNA methylation and gene expression. Epigenetics. 2011;6:1284–1294. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.11.17819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Filis P., Nagrath N., Fraser M., Hay D.C., Iredale J.P., O'Shaughnessy P. Maternal smoking dysregulates protein expression in second trimester human fetal livers in a sex-specific manner. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015;100:E861–70. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tuomisto J., Holl K., Rantakokko P., Koskela P., Hallmans G., Wadell G. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and testicular cancer in the sons: a nested case-control study and a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer. 2009;45:1640–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Burke M.D., Thompson S., Elcombe C.R., Halpert J., Haaparanta T., Mayer R.T. Ethoxy-, pentoxy- and benzyloxyphenoxazones and homologues: a series of substrates to distinguish between different induced cytochromes P-450. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1985;34:3337–3345. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(85)90355-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Greenlee W.F., Poland A. An improved assay of 7-ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase activity: induction of hepatic enzyme activity in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice by phenobarbital, 3-methylcholanthrene and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1978;205:596–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pasanen M. Human placental aromatase activity: use of a C18 reversed-phase cartridge for separation of tritiated water or steroid metabolites in placentas from both smoking and non-smoking mothers in vitro. Biol. Res. Pregnancy Perinatol. 1985;6:94–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Collier A.C., Tingle M.D., Keelan J.A., Paxton J.W., Mitchell M.D. A highly sensitive fluorescent microplate method for the determination of UDP-glucuronosyl transferase activity in tissues and placental cell lines. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2000;28:1184–1186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Habig W.H., Pabst M.J., Jakoby W.B. Glutathione S-transferases: the first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1974;249:7130–7139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Keski-Rahkonen P., Huhtinen K., Poutanen M., Auriola S. Fast and sensitive liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay for seven androgenic and progestagenic steroids in human serum. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011;127:396–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.O'Shaughnessy P.J., Monteiro A., Bhattacharya S., Fowler P.A. Maternal smoking and fetal sex significantly affect metabolic enzyme expression in the human fetal liver. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;96:2851–2860. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bellingham M., Amezaga M.R., Mandon-Pepin B., Speers C.J., Kyle C.E., Evans N.P. Exposure to chemical cocktails before or after conception-the effect of timing on ovarian development. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2013;376:156–172. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fowler P.A., Flannigan S., Mathers A., Gillanders K., Lea R.G., Wood M.J. Gene expression analysis of human fetal ovarian primordial follicle formation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;94:1427–1435. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Karve T.M., Cheema A.K. Small changes huge impact: the role of protein posttranslational modifications in cellular homeostasis and disease. J. Amino Acids. 2011;2011:207691. doi: 10.4061/2011/207691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gettins P.G. Serpin structure, mechanism, and function. Chem. Rev. 2002;102:4751–4804. doi: 10.1021/cr010170+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Aldonyte R., Jansson L., Ljungberg O., Larsson S., Janciauskiene S. Polymerized alpha-antitrypsin is present on lung vascular endothelium. New insights into the biological significance of alpha-antitrypsin polymerization. Histopathology. 2004;45:587–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.02021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oliva K., Barker G., Riley C., Bailey M.J., Permezel M., Rice G.E. The effect of pre-existing maternal obesity on the placental proteome: two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2012;48:139–149. doi: 10.1530/JME-11-0123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Feng Y.L., Zhou C.J., Li X.M., Liang X.Q. Alpha-1-antitrypsin acts as a preeclampsia-related protein: a proteomic study. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2012;73:252–259. doi: 10.1159/000334820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Linja-aho A., Mazur W., Toljamo T., Nieminen P., Ohlmeier S., Rönty M. Distribution and levels of alpha-1-antitrypsin in the lung and plasma in smokers and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. APMIS. 2013;121:11–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02936.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stone W.L., Bailey B., Khraisha N. The pathophysiology of smoking during pregnancy: a systems biology approach. Front. Biosci. (Elite Ed.) 2014;6:318–328. doi: 10.2741/e708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Miao Z., Chen M., Wu H., Ding H., Shi Z. Comparative proteomic profile of the human placenta in normal and fetal growth restriction subjects. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2014;34:1701–1710. doi: 10.1159/000366371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cochran B.J., Gunawardhana L.P., Vine K.L., Lee J.A., Lobov S., Ranson M. The CD-loop of PAI-2 (SERPINB2) is redundant in the targeting, inhibition and clearance of cell surface uPA activity. BMC Biotechnol. 2009;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-9-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hussain N., Krueger W., Covault J., Walsh S., Kranzler H.R., Oncken C. Effects of prenatal tobacco exposure on gene expression profiling in umbilical cord tissue. Pediatr. Res. 2008;64:147–153. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31817c5507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Colquhoun D.R., Goldman L.R., Cole R.N., Gucek M., Mansharamani M., Witter F.R. Global screening of human cord blood proteomes for biomarkers of toxic exposure and effect. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009;117:832–838. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Basar M., Yen C.F., Buchwalder L.F., Murk W., Huang S.J., Godlewski K. Preeclampsia-related increase of interleukin-11 expression in human decidual cells. Reproduction. 2010;140:605–612. doi: 10.1530/REP-10-0263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Obolenskaya M.Y., Teplyuk N.M., Divi R.L., Poirier M.C., Filimonova N.B., Zadrozna M. Human placental glutathione S-transferase activity and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon DNA adducts as biomarkers for environmental oxidative stress in placentas from pregnant women living in radioactivity- and chemically-polluted regions. Toxicol. Lett. 2010;196:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.03.1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhou H., Fu G., Yu H., Peng C. Transforming growth factor-beta inhibits aromatase gene transcription in human trophoblast cells via the Smad2 signaling pathway. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2009;7:146. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-146. 7827-7-146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mushahary D., Gautam P., Sundaram C.S., Sirdeshmukh R. Expanded protein expression profile of human placenta using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Placenta. 2013;34:193–196. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kitawaki J., Inoue S., Tamura T., Yamamoto T., Honjo H., Higashiyama T. Cigarette smoking during pregnancy lowers aromatase cytochrome P-450 in the human placenta. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1993;45:485–491. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(93)90163-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Drolet R., Simard M., Plante J., Laberge P., Tremblay Y. Human type 2 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase mRNA and protein distribution in placental villi at mid and term pregnancy. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2007;5:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-5-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fowler P.A., Childs A.J., Courant F., MacKenzie A., Rhind S.M., Antignac J.P. In utero exposure to cigarette smoke dysregulates human fetal ovarian developmental signalling. Hum. Reprod. 2014;29:1471–1489. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Duskova M., Hruskovicova H., Simunkova K., Starka L., Parizek A. The effects of smoking on steroid metabolism and fetal programming. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014;139:138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tong V.T., J.R. Jones, P.M. Dietz, D. D'Angelo, J.M. Bombard, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy-Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 31 sites, 2000–2005 MMWR Surveill Summ 2009;58:1–29. [PubMed]
- 43.Demir R., Demir A.Y., Yinanc M. Structural changes in placental barrier of smoking mother. A quantitative and ultrastructural study. Pathol. Res. Pract. 1994;190:656–667. doi: 10.1016/s0344-0338(11)80744-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Haavaldsen C., Samuelsen S.O., Eskild A. The association of maternal age with placental weight: a population-based study of 536,954 pregnancies. BJOG. 2011;118:1470–1476. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03053.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van Oppenraaij R.H., Koning A.H., van den Hoff M.J., van der Spek P.J., Steegers E.A., Exalto N. The effect of smoking on early chorionic villous vascularisation. Placenta. 2012;33:645–651. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee H.J., Jeong S.K., Na K., Lee M.J., Lee S.H., Lim J.S. Comprehensive genome-wide proteomic analysis of human placental tissue for the Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project. J. Proteome Res. 2013;12:2458–2466. doi: 10.1021/pr301040g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.