Abstract
Developments in the United Kingdom national external quality assessment scheme for virology are described. There are about 198 participants (170 in the UK) who are enrolled for examination of any or all of five categories of specimen (distribution types). These are detection of rubella antibody (128 UK participants), detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (130 UK participants), general virus serology (86 UK participants), virus identification (85 UK participants), and electron microscopy (56 UK participants). Specimens of a sixth category (rubella IgM antibody), not yet formally established, have also been distributed to 67 UK participants. Specimens in each distribution type are sent out once or twice a year, and, except for rubella IgM antibody, participants have been given a score of 2, 1, 0 or -1 marks for their reports on each specimen. Their cumulative scores and performance ratings are calculated retrospectively over a 12 month period for each distribution type separately and for combined distributions. The performance rating is defined by the number of standard errors by which the individual's cumulative score differs from the mean for all participants and carries a + or - sign depending on whether the cumulative score lies above or below the mean. Performance ratings have been found generally to be close to the mean in rubella serology and detection of hepatitis B surface antigen but are more variable in virus identification and electron microscopy. Ratings of less than -1.96 are considered to be significantly worse than average and to constitute poor performance.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- College of American Pathologists Quality Assurance Programs. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Oct;80(4 Suppl):551–647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanson M. R., Polesky H. F. Radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay methods for detecting viral hepatitis markers. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Oct;80(4 Suppl):590–593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hart R. J. Quality control in diagnostic virology. Proc R Soc Med. 1975 Oct;68(10):622–624. doi: 10.1177/003591577506801010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skendzel L. P., Wilcox K. R., Edson D. C. Evaluation of assays for the detection of antibodies to rubella. A report based on data from the College of American Pathologists Surveys of 1982. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Oct;80(4 Suppl):594–598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snell J. J., Brown D. F., Gardner P. S. Comparison of results from two antibiotic susceptibility testing trials that formed part of the United Kingdom national external quality assessment scheme. J Clin Pathol. 1984 Mar;37(3):321–328. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.3.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snell J. J., De Mello J. V., Gardner P. S. The United Kingdom national microbiological quality assessment scheme. J Clin Pathol. 1982 Jan;35(1):82–93. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.1.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor R. N., Fulford K. M., Przybyszewski V. A., Pope V. Center for Disease Control Diagnostic Immunology Proficiency Testing Program results for 1978. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Dec;10(6):805–814. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.6.805-814.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor R. N., Fulford K. M. Results of the Center for Disease Control Proficiency Testing Program for the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jul;4(1):32–39. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.1.32-39.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tillett H. E., Crone P. B. Quality control of the isolation rate of pathogens in medical microbiology laboratories. J Hyg (Lond) 1976 Dec;77(3):359–367. doi: 10.1017/s002217240005573x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitehead T. P., Woodford F. P. External quality assessment of clinical laboratories in the United Kingdom. J Clin Pathol. 1981 Sep;34(9):947–957. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.9.947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]