Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1985 May;38(5):561–564. doi: 10.1136/jcp.38.5.561

Evaluation of Bactigen latex agglutination and Phadebact coagglutination for detection of bacterial antigens in cerebrospinal fluid.

Y M Coovadia, K K Naidu
PMCID: PMC499209  PMID: 3923058

Abstract

The Bactigen latex agglutination and Phadebact coagglutination tests were evaluated for their ability to detect bacterial antigens of Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae (83 serotypes) and Neisseria meningitidis groups A, B, C, and Y in 214 samples of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Bactigen latex agglutination was more sensitive than Phadebact coagglutination: it detected 87% (59/68) of culture positive CSF specimens, whereas Phadebact detected 72% (52/72). Bactigen detected all cases of meningitis caused by S pneumoniae and H influenzae. Of the 19 specimens that were positive for N meningitidis, 74% were detected by Phadebact and only 53% by Bactigen. Gram stain results were positive for 85% of all specimens positive on culture. Bactigen was slightly more specific (97%) than Phadebact (96%). Bactigen, however, showed less specificity (81%) than Phadebact (94%) on 31 CSF specimens that were culture positive for organisms other than the test organisms. These included two CSF specimens from patients with tuberculous meningitis which gave false positive results for S pneumoniae with the Bactigen reagents. No false positive results were obtained on 104 culture negative CSF samples. Bactigen latex agglutination was superior to Phadebact coagglutination and Gram stain for the detection of S pneumoniae and H influenzae in CSF specimens from patients with bacteriologically proved meningitis.

Full text

PDF
561

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Colding H., Lind I. Counterimmunoelectrophoresis in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Apr;5(4):405–409. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.4.405-409.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Drow D. L., Welch D. F., Hensel D., Eisenach K., Long E., Slifkin M. Evaluation of the Phadebact CSF test for detection of the four most common causes of bacterial meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Dec;18(6):1358–1361. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.6.1358-1361.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. LaForce F. M., Brice J. L., Tornabene T. G. Diagnosis of bacterial meningitis by gas-liquid chromatography. II. Analysis of spinal fluid. J Infect Dis. 1979 Oct;140(4):453–464. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.4.453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Marcon M. J., Hamoudi A. C., Cannon H. J. Comparative laboratory evaluation of three antigen detection methods for diagnosis of Haemophilus influenzae type b disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Mar;19(3):333–337. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.3.333-337.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tilton R. C., Dias F., Ryan R. W. Comparative evaluation of three commercial products and counterimmunoelectrophoresis for the detection of antigens in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Aug;20(2):231–234. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.2.231-234.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wasilauskas B. L., Hampton K. D. Determination of bacterial meningitis: a retrospective study of 80 cerebrospinal fluid specimens evaluated by four in vitro methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):531–535. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.531-535.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Welch D. F., Hensel D. Evaluation of Bactogen and Phadebact for detection of Haemophilus influenzae type b antigen in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Nov;16(5):905–908. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.5.905-908.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES