Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2016 Aug 16;7(4):e01237-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01237-16

Accessory Gene Regulator-1 Locus Is Essential for Virulence and Pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile

Charles Darkoh a,b,, Chioma Odo a, Herbert L DuPont a,b
PMCID: PMC4992976  PMID: 27531912

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is responsible for most of the definable cases of antibiotic- and hospital-associated diarrhea worldwide and is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in older patients. C. difficile, a multidrug-resistant anaerobic pathogen, causes disease by producing toxins A and B, which are controlled by an accessory gene regulator (Agr) quorum signaling system. Some C. difficile strains encode two Agr loci in their genomes, designated agr1 and agr2. The agr1 locus is present in all of the C. difficile strains sequenced to date, whereas the agr2 locus is present in a few strains. The functional roles of agr1 and agr2 in C. difficile toxin regulation and pathogenesis were unknown until now. Using allelic exchange, we deleted components of both agr loci and examined the mutants for toxin production and virulence. The results showed that the agr1 mutant cannot produce toxins A and B; toxin production can be restored by complementation with wild-type agr1. Furthermore, the agr1 mutant is able to colonize but unable to cause disease in a murine CDI model. These findings have profound implications for CDI treatment because we have uncovered a promising therapeutic target for the development of nonantibiotic drugs to treat this life-threatening emerging pathogen by targeting the toxins directly responsible for disease.

IMPORTANCE

Within the last decade, the number of cases of C. difficile infections has been increasing exponentially in the United States, resulting in about 4.8 billion U.S. dollars in health care costs annually. As a multidrug-resistant, spore-forming, anaerobic pathogen, C. difficile overpopulates the colon after the gut microbiota has been altered by antibiotic therapy. With increasing resistance to antibiotic treatment of C. difficile infections, patients are experiencing higher costs of health care and a lower quality of life as treatment options decrease. During infection, C. difficile produces toxins A and B, which directly cause disease. As a result, the toxins have become promising nonantibiotic treatment targets. Here, we have identified a pathway responsible for activating the production of the toxins. This important finding opens up a unique therapeutic target for the development of a novel nonantibiotic therapy for C. difficile infections.

INTRODUCTION

Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) account for most of the cases of antibiotic- and hospital-associated diarrhea with defined etiology worldwide and are a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in older hospitalized patients (1). CDI has traditionally been treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, antibiotic therapy is the highest risk factor for CDI (2, 3), because it significantly alters and weakens the colonization resistance provided by the diverse microbiota that protects the colon. This allows multidrug-resistant C. difficile, usually a normal commensal, to proliferate and cause disease. Antibiotic-based treatment of CDI also leads to recurrence in as many as 25 to 30% of the cases (4, 5). Thus, there is a critical need for nonantibiotic CDI therapies that preserve the colonic microbiota, as either stand-alone or adjunctive therapies to augment the efficacy of the current treatment options. During infection, C. difficile produces toxins A and B, which are directly responsible for disease (69). As a result, the toxins have become promising nonantibiotic treatment targets. Despite the enormous significance of the toxins in C. difficile pathogenesis, the molecular mechanisms and key players involved in the regulation of the toxins are not fully understood. Knowledge of the mechanism of C. difficile toxin regulation will be critical in developing novel nonantibiotic therapies to target the toxins for the treatment of this pathogen of significant public health importance.

The accessory gene regulator (Agr) quorum signaling system regulates virulence and colonization factors in several Gram-positive bacteria (3, 10, 11). In Staphylococcus aureus, where it has been excellently characterized, the Agr system is transcribed as a four-gene operon comprising agrA, -B, -C, and -D (1214). The agrD gene encodes a prepeptide that is processed by the transmembrane protein AgrB to produce an autoinducer peptide (AIP) and released into the extracellular milieu. The AgrC histidine kinase protein senses and binds extracellular AIP, which activates its ATPase activity, resulting in autophosphorylation and phosphoryl group transfer to AgrA. Phosphorylated AgrA forms a dimer, which enables the C-terminal DNA binding domain to bind either to the promoter region of the agr operon to produce more transcripts of the agr system components or at the RNAIII promoter to regulate the transcription of target genes (10, 15).

The agr operon can commonly be divided into two pathways: (i) a signal generation pathway that generates the AIP and (ii) a response pathway that senses and transduces the AIP to activate target gene expression. Some C. difficile strains possess two loci of the agr component genes, designated agr1 and agr2. The agr1 locus is present in all of the C. difficile strains sequenced to date (including the historical 630 strain) and contains only the AIP generation pathway genes (agrB1 and agrD1). On the other hand, the agr2 locus, which is mostly present in a small number of strains, including the hypervirulent NAP1/027 R20291 strain, contains both AIP generation (agrB2, agrD2) and AIP response (agrC2, agrA2) genes. The main roles of these two accessory gene loci in C. difficile pathogenesis have not been clear until now. We previously demonstrated that C. difficile toxins A and B are regulated by an Agr-like quorum signaling system and purified a peptide thiolactone AIP (termed the TI signal) from the stationary-phase culture supernatant that activates toxin production (16). Because of the presence of the agr1 locus in the genomes of all sequenced toxigenic C. difficile strains, we hypothesized that it is responsible for TI signal generation and plays a central role in toxin production. Using allelic exchange, we deleted the agr loci from the 630 and NAP1/027 R20291 strains, and the results demonstrate that the agr1 mutant of each strain is avirulent. This important finding underscores the clinical implication of Agr quorum signaling in C. difficile pathogenesis and opens up a unique therapeutic target for the development of a novel nonantibiotic therapy for CDI.

RESULTS

To examine the roles of the two accessory gene regulator loci in C. difficile toxin production and virulence, the proposed AIP generation pathway loci agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 were deleted by allelic exchange. DNA sequences upstream and downstream of these loci (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) were PCR amplified, assembled, and cloned into plasmid pMTL82151 (17). Following conjugation, single-crossover mutants were selected by subculturing three times in a medium with antibiotic selection. Double-crossover mutants were subsequently selected by subculturing the single-crossover mutants 10 times without antibiotic selection and the deletion mutants were confirmed by PCR. Deletion of the agrB1D1 locus resulted in a PCR product of 756 bp, compared to 1,500 bp for wild-type strain 630 and 258 bp (wild type, 1,500 bp) for strain R20291 (Fig. 1A and B). Deletion of the agrB2D2 locus from strain R20291 also resulted in a 560-bp (wild type, 1,340 bp) PCR product. To confirm the locations of the deletions in the genome, the PCR products were sequenced and the DNA sequence results demonstrated complete deletion of the agrB1D1 locus from the genomes of both strains and of the agrB2D2 locus from that of strain R20291.

FIG 1 .

FIG 1 

Deletion of the C. difficile accessory gene regulator autoinducing peptide generation loci (agrB1D1 and agrB2D2) by allelic exchange. DNA sequences upstream and downstream of the agrB1D1 locus of strain 630 (A) and the agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 loci of strain R20291 (B) were cloned into the pMTL82151 plasmid and transferred into the C. difficile strains by conjugation with E. coli CA434 bearing the assembled allelic-exchange cassette. The deletion mutants were confirmed by PCR and analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. (C) Western blot analysis of 48-h culture supernatant fluids from the R20291 agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 mutants. Supernatants from 48-h cultures were concentrated with the Pierce 150-kDa concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL) and subjected to 6% PAGE. The protein bands were transferred onto a 0.45-µm nitrocellulose membrane and probed with monoclonal antibodies specific for toxins A and B. The toxin bands on the transferred membrane were detected with the Protein Detector Western blot BCIP/NBT kit (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD). WT, wild type; MT, mutant; I, wild type; II, agrB1D1 mutant; III, complemented agrB1D1 mutant; IV, agrB2D2 mutant.

C. difficile R20291 and 630 agrB1D1 mutants cannot produce toxins.

To evaluate the effects of agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 deletions on toxin production, 48-h culture supernatant fluids collected from the mutant and wild-type strains were concentrated and analyzed by Western blotting with monoclonal antibodies that specifically recognize toxins A and B. No toxin bands were detected in the culture fluids collected from the R20291 agrB1D1 mutant (Fig. 1C) and the 630 agrB1D1 mutant (see Fig. S2A in the supplemental material). However, the bands corresponding to toxins A and B were detected in the culture supernatant fluids collected from the R20291 wild-type strain and the agrB2D2 mutant. The culture fluids were further tested for the presence of toxins by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the results corroborated those obtained by Western blotting (see Fig. S2B and C). To examine whether the type of growth medium may affect toxin production by the mutants, the cells were also cultured in TY medium (3% Bacto tryptose, 2% yeast extract) and the supernatant fluids were tested for toxin. No toxin was detected in the supernatant fluids collected from the agrB1D1 mutants of both strains (see Fig. S3), suggesting that the function of the agrB1D1 locus in toxin production is not affected by the type of growth medium.

To examine whether the agr mutants transcribe the toxin genes, total RNA was isolated from mid-stationary-phase cultures of the mutants grown in either brain heart infusion (BHI) medium or TY medium and quantitative PCR was performed with cDNA converted from total RNA as the template. No significant mRNA transcripts corresponding to the toxin genes (tcdA and tcdB) were detected from the 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants cultured in either BHI or TY medium (Fig. 2A to D). On the contrary, the toxin gene transcripts were detected in the wild-type strains and R20291 agrB2D2 mutant cultured in both media. Furthermore, there was no significant difference (P = 0.235) in the mRNA transcripts detected in the mutants cultured in both media. These results demonstrate that the agrB1D1 mutant is unable to transcribe significant amount of the toxin genes and that the agrB1D1 locus plays a central role in toxin production.

FIG 2 .

FIG 2 

Analysis of agr mutants for transcription of the toxin genes (tcdA and tcdB) in BHI and TY media. The 630 wild-type, agrB1D1 mutant, and complemented agrB1D1 mutant strains were cultured in either BHI (A) or TY (B) medium. The R20291 wild-type, agrB1D1 mutant, complemented agrB1D1 mutant, and agrB2D2 mutant strains were also cultured in either BHI (C) or TY (D) medium. The cultures were incubated for 16 h anaerobically at 37°C. Total RNA was isolated with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen), and this was followed by cDNA synthesis by reverse transcription using the ProtoScript AMV First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) with 1 µg of the isolated total RNA. Quantitative PCR was performed with primers specific for tcdA, tcdB, and the cDNA used as the template. Known quantities of tcdA and tcdB DNA were used as standards. The difference between the tcdA and tcdB transcript levels detected in the wild-type and agrB1B1 mutant strains was significant (P = 0.0001), but there was no significant difference (P = 0.235) between the two culture media. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three independent experiments.

To confirm that loss of toxin production by the mutants was directly due to the absence of the agrB1D1 genes, the mutants were transformed with a plasmid bearing the wild-type agrB1D1 locus. This restored toxin production in both 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants at levels comparable to those of the wild-type strains (Fig. 3A and B), indicating that agrB1D1, which is universally present in all of the C. difficile strains whose genomes have been sequenced to date, is essential in toxin production.

FIG 3 .

FIG 3 

Plasmid-mediated and extracellular complementation restores toxin production in the hypervirulent NAP1/027 R20291 (A) and nonhypervirulent 630 (B) toxin-deficient agrB1D1 mutants. The R20291 and 630 agrB1D1 mutants were complemented with a plasmid bearing the wild-type agrB1D1 locus, and the complemented mutants were tested for toxin production. The mutants were also incubated in BHI medium anaerobically for 48 h in the presence or absence of the TI signal purified from wild-type strain 630. Toxin production was detected with the Cdifftox activity assay (30). agrB2D2 Mut, R20291 agrB2D2 deletion mutant; agrB1D1 Mut, agrB1D1 deletion mutant; agrB1D1 Mut+Comp, agrB1D1 deletion mutant complemented with a plasmid bearing the wild-type agrB1D1 locus. The difference in toxin activity between the wild type and the agrB1D1 mutant was significant (P = 0.0001 for both strains). Error bars represent the standard deviations of three independent experiments.

We previously purified a thiolactone AIP (designated the TI signal) from strain 630 and R20291 stationary-phase culture supernatant fluids that induced toxin production in all strains (16). Bioinformatic analysis suggested that the TI signal originates from the agrD1 gene, which is a component of the agrB1D1 locus. To investigate whether the purified TI signal can restore toxin production in R20291 and 630 agrB1D1 mutants, these mutants were incubated with the TI signal and their culture fluids were tested for toxin. In the absence of the TI signal, no toxin was detected in the culture fluids collected from both R20291 and 630 agrB1D1 mutants (Fig. 3A and B). Remarkably, toxin was detected when the agrB1D1 mutants were cultured in the presence of the TI signal, indicating that the TI signal restored the ability of the agrB1D1 mutants to make toxins.

To determine whether agrB1D1 mutants can produce the TI signal, culture supernatant fluids from the mutants were examined for the presence of the TI signal by a previously described high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-based purification method (16). No HPLC peak associated with the TI signal was observed in the culture fluids from 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants. Likewise, fractions collected at elution times similar to that of the TI signal did not induce toxin production. On the other hand, the TI signal peak was observed in the culture fluids collected from either the complemented agrB1D1 mutants or the R20291 agrB2D2 mutant that has a wild-type agrB1D1 locus. HPLC fractions associated with the observed TI signal peak induced toxin production in both 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants (see Fig. S4A and B in the supplemental material). These series of experiments provide direct evidence that the agrB1D1 mutant is deficient in TI signal synthesis and that the agrB1D1 locus is responsible for TI signal generation.

Culture supernatant fluids from 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants do not cause cytotoxicity and have no effect on cell viability.

The C. difficile toxins are cytotoxic and cause cell rounding when incubated with human foreskin fibroblast cells. To investigate whether culture supernatant fluids from the mutants can cause cytotoxicity, human foreskin fibroblast cells were incubated with sterilized 48-h culture fluids collected from the agr mutant strains and analyzed by microscopy for pathologic effects. As expected, fibroblast cells incubated with culture fluids collected from the wild-type 630 and R20291 strains and the R20291 agrB2D2 mutant appeared rounded and spindle-like and generally exhibited altered morphology (Fig. 4B and E and H); all of these phenotypes are consistent with previous reports describing the cytopathic and cytotoxic effects of the toxins (11, 18, 19). On the contrary, fibroblast cells incubated with culture fluids from the 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants did not exhibit either cytopathic or cytotoxic effects and appeared morphologically similar to untreated control fibroblast cells (Fig. 4A, C, and F). The cytotoxic effects associated with the toxins were observed when fibroblast cells were treated with culture fluids from the complemented 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants that harbored a plasmid-borne wild-type agrB1D1 locus (Fig. 4D and G).

FIG 4 .

FIG 4 

Culture supernatant fluids collected from the agrB1D1 mutants are not cytotoxic to human foreskin fibroblast cells. Strain 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 mutants were cultured for 48 h in BHI medium anaerobically at 37°C. The culture supernatant fluids were collected, filter sterilized with a 0.45-µm filter, and examined for cytotoxicity with the Bartels Clostridium difficile cytotoxicity assay kit (Trinity Biotech, Jamestown, NY). The culture fluids were incubated with the fibroblast cells for 24 h and observed under a microscope for cytotoxic effects. Images were taken with an EVOS XL microscope (Advanced Microscopy Group) at ×20 magnification. Panels: A, a representative image of fibroblast cells cultured in growth medium only; B, wild-type 630; C, 630 agrB1D1 mutant; D, 630 complemented agrB1D1 mutant; E, wild-type R20291; F, R20291 agrB1D1 mutant; G, complemented R20291 agrB1D1 mutant; H, R20291 agrB2D2 mutant.

To assess the viability of the treated fibroblast cells, the inherent ability of living cells to convert tetrazolium salt into a blue formazan product was measured using the CellTiter 96 Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Madison, WI). In this assay, the amount of tetrazolium salt conversion to formazan corresponds to the number of viable cells. The results showed no significant difference (P = 0.305) between the amount of formazan produced by fibroblast cells incubated with culture fluids from the 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants and that produced by untreated control cells (Fig. 5A and B). Similarly, the amount of formazan produced by fibroblast cells treated with culture supernatants from the complemented 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants, the R20291 agrB2D2 mutant, and the respective wild-type strains were also comparable and not significantly different (P = 0.356). However, the amount of formazan produced by fibroblast cells treated with culture fluids collected from the agrB1D1 mutants and untreated controls was significantly higher (P = 0.001) than that produced by the wild-type, complemented agrB1D1 mutant, and R20291 agrB2D2 mutant strains. These results demonstrate that the culture fluid from the agrB1D1 mutant is not cytotoxic and this is likely due to the absence of toxin.

FIG 5 .

FIG 5 

Culture supernatants from C. difficile agrB1D1 mutants have no effect on cell viability. Strain 630 (A) and R20291 (B) agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 mutants were cultured for 48 h in BHI medium anaerobically at 37°C. The culture supernatant fluids were collected, filter sterilized with a 0.45-µm filter, and tested for their effect on cell viability. Briefly, ready-made fibroblast cells (Trinity Biotech, Jamestown, NY) were treated with the culture supernatant fluids and incubated for 48 h at 37°C aerobically. Following the incubation period, cell viability was examined with the CellTiter 96 nonradioactive cell proliferation assay (Promega, Madison, WI) in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer. agrB1D1 Mut, agrB1D1 deletion mutant; agrB1D1 Mut+Comp, agrB1D1 mutant complemented with a plasmid bearing the wild-type agrB1D1 locus; agrB2D2 Mut, R20291 agrB2D2 deletion mutant. The differences between the amounts of formazan produced by fibroblast cells treated with supernatants from the agrB1D1 mutants and wild-type strains, the complemented agrB1D1 mutants, and the R20291 agrB2D2 mutant were significant (P = 0.0012). Error bars represent the standard deviations of three independent experiments.

R20291 agrB1D1 mutant is avirulent in mice.

The hypervirulent C. difficile NAP1/027 R20291 strain is known to cause severe disease due to high toxin production, and it is commonly isolated from stool samples of CDI patients (2023). To evaluate whether the agr mutant can cause disease in an oral CDI infection model, mice were infected with wild-type R20291, the agrB1D1 mutant, and the complemented agrB1D1 mutant. The animals were monitored for 14 days postinfection and scored on the basis of three endpoint symptoms: (i) diarrhea, hunched posture, and physical appearance; (ii) movement and response to external stimulus; and (iii) weight loss. Mice (n = 12 in each group) infected with the wild-type strain became moribund from day 2, and only 8% survived for 14 days (Fig. 6A). Of the mice infected with the R20291 agrB1D1 mutant, 92% survived the 14-day postinfection monitoring period. The difference between the survival rates of mice treated with the agrB1D1 mutant and mice treated with the wild type was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). However, when the mice were infected with the complemented agrB1D1 mutant, 42% survived and the survival rate was not statistically significantly different from that of mice treated with the wild-type strain (P = 0.2206).

FIG 6 .

FIG 6 

Hypervirulent R20291 agrB1D1 mutant is unable to cause C. difficile-associated disease in mice. Seven-week-old (both male and female) C57BL/6 mice (n = 12 in each group) were first treated with a cocktail of antibiotics; infected with the R20291 wild type, agrB1D1 mutant, agrB2D2 mutant, or complemented agrB1D1 mutant; and then monitored for 14 days. The animals were scored on the basis of the following endpoint symptoms: (i) diarrhea, hunched posture, and physical appearance (0, normal [good hair coat, normal posture, frequent grooming, no discharge from the eyes or nose]; 1, hunched posture and infrequent grooming; 2, hunched posture, no grooming [ruffled hair], distended stomach, and diarrhea [noticeable dehydration]); (ii) movement and response to external stimuli (0, normal [normal activity, alertness, response to stimuli, regular eating and drinking habits]; 1, reduced movement, reduced alertness, reduced response to stimuli, or uncoordinated movement; 2, no movement, no activity, no eating, no drinking or alertness); and (iii) body weight changes (0, normal [normal food consumption with normal urine and fecal output]; 1, 5 to 15% loss of body weight; 2, 15 to 20% loss of body weight). Animals that were assessed an endpoint score of 2 for any of the above three parameters during the 14-day observation period were euthanized because they were always moribund. Percent survival is the proportion of animals assessed an endpoint score of <2. (B) colonization of mice by the agrB1D1 mutant and the complemented mutant. (C) No toxins were detected in pellets of mice infected with the R20291 agrB1D1 mutant. Pellets collected from the mice on day 5 were tested for the presence of C. difficile cells by counting the CFU on selective plates and for toxins A and B with the Wampole C. difficile TOX A/B II assay (Technologies Lab, Blacksburg, VA). Data presented are the average readings from the 12 mice evaluated per group. The difference between the survival rates of mice treated with the agrB1D1 mutant and the wild type was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference (P = 0.439) between the CFU counts of mice infected with the wild-type strain, the agrB1D1 mutant, or the complemented agrB1D1 mutant. Error bars represent the standard deviations of the 12 samples tested per group.

To examine the ability of the agrB1D1 mutant to colonize, collected stool pellets were diluted and cultured on selective plates for CFU counting. There was no significant difference (P = 0.335) between the CFU counts of mice infected with the wild-type strain, mice infected with the agrB1D1 mutant, and mice infected with the complemented agrB1D1 mutant (Fig. 6B). These results demonstrate that the agrB1D1 mutant is able to colonize, similar to the wild type. The collected stool pellets were also tested for toxin by ELISA. No toxin was detected in the pellets from the animals infected with the agrB1D1 mutant. On the other hand, toxins were detected in all of the mice infected with the wild-type and complemented agrB1D1 mutant strains (Fig. 6C). All together, these results provide further evidence that the agrB1D1 locus is essential for C. difficile virulence and underscore the importance of the Agr quorum signaling system in the pathogenesis of this multidrug-resistant pathogen.

DISCUSSION

Recent years have seen an increase in the incidence of CDIs related to antibiotic use (3). Broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is a major risk factor for CDI (2). With increasing resistance to antibiotic treatment of CDIs, patients are experiencing higher costs of health care and a lower quality of life as treatment options decrease (21, 2426). These problems, along with reduced colonization resistance associated with alteration of the gut microbiota, make long-term treatment of recurrent CDIs with antibiotics ineffective. As a result, there is a new interest in developing effective nonantibiotic therapies for CDIs. Since the A and B toxins are directly associated with disease, targeting these toxins by inhibiting either their production or their activity is deemed a promising approach. Antimicrobial resistance is expected to be greatly reduced because of the lack of selective pressure with this approach. In fact, several studies have proposed using nontoxigenic C. difficile strains to outcompete toxigenic strains as a treatment method (27). Here, we have identified a bona fide C. difficile toxin regulatory pathway that can be targeted therapeutically as a nonantibiotic therapy for CDI.

Using a genetic approach, we systematically deleted the agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 quorum signaling loci from the C. difficile 630 and R20291 strains and evaluated the mutants for toxin production. Our results demonstrate that the agrB1D1 locus is responsible for generating the TI signal, a peptide thiolactone required to activate toxin production (16). We further show that the agrB1D1 mutant is unable to produce toxin because it cannot generate the TI signal. The agrB1D1 locus is present in all of the toxigenic C. difficile strains whose genomes have been sequenced to date, unlike the agrB2D2 locus that is present in a few strains. In the NAP1/027 R20291 strain that has both the agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 loci in its genome (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), only agrB1D1 deletion leads to loss of toxin production, suggesting that the agrB1D1 locus plays a central role in C. difficile toxin A and B production. An agrB2D2 deletion mutant that has the wild-type agrB1D1 genes is able to generate the TI signal and thus produce toxin (Fig. 3). Moreover, the purified TI signal from the R20291 agrB2D2 mutant is able to activate toxin production in the 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants (see Fig. S3). We have also demonstrated that the R20291 agrB1D1 mutant is able to colonize, but unable to cause disease in a mouse model of CDI. These findings provide strong support for the roles of the agrB1D1 locus and toxin production in C. difficile pathogenesis and virulence.

We note that our attempt to generate an isogenic mutant agrD1 gene was unsuccessful because of its small size (147 bp). However, the AgrB1 protein is required to process and cleave the AgrD1 autoinducing prepeptide to generate the TI signal, and hence, deletion of the agrB1D1 locus was the most plausible alternative. Also, Martin et al. (28) observed a modest decrease in toxin A level in the R20291 strain with a TargeTron insertion in agrA2. The basis for the slightly different results is unclear at present. Also, the agr1 locus has no cognate two-component sensor histidine kinase and response regulator in its vicinity in the genome, as would be expected in other quorum signaling systems. We previously demonstrated that the R20291 strain utilizes the two-component response regulator agrA2 present at the agr2 locus to transduce the TI signal (16), now established to be produced solely from its agr1 locus. However, how other strains, such as 630, that do not have the agr2 locus in their genomes sense and transduce the TI signal has yet to be determined. Our investigations to identify all of the key players of the two C. difficile Agr quorum signaling systems and their respective roles are ongoing. We anticipate that identification and characterization of the TI signal sensory and response regulatory elements in all of the strains will likely provide evolutionary insights into this unique toxin regulatory system. Overall, our current findings have uncovered a promising target for the development of a novel nonantibiotic therapy to combat C. difficile, a multidrug-resistant pathogen of significant public health importance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.

Toxigenic C. difficile strain ATCC BAA-1382 (tcdA+ tcdB+; strain 630) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA), and the R20291 stock (NAP1/027; tcdA+ tcdB+) was from a previous study (16). Bacterial cultures were grown in BBL BHI medium (Becton, Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD) or TY medium. Single colonies were also isolated on Cdifftox agar (29) plates. Cultures were incubated anaerobically in an atmosphere of 10% H2, 5% CO2, and 85% N2 at 37°C in a Controlled Atmosphere Anaerobic Chamber (PLAS LABS, Lansing, MI). The BHI medium used in all of the experiments was reduced by incubation overnight in the anaerobic chamber prior to use. The substrate for the Cdifftox activity assay (30), p-nitrophenyl-β-d-glucopyranoside, was purchased from Biosynth International (Itasca, IL).

Sample storage conditions for bacterial stocks.

Bacterial stocks were stored short-term in chopped meat broth (BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lakes, NJ) at room temperature or long-term in autoclaved 10% dimethyl sulfoxide at −80°C.

Toxin assays. (i) Cdiff activity assay.

The Cdifftox activity assay (30) was used to detect the combined activities of C. difficile toxins A and B in culture supernatant fluid. Briefly, the culture was centrifuged for 15 min at 10,000 × g at 4°C; 250 µl of the supernatant fluids was incubated with 30 µl of 30 mM p-nitrophenyl-β-d-glucopyranoside and incubated either for 4 h at 37°C or overnight at room temperature. The assay was quantitated spectrophotometrically by reading the absorbance of 410 nm. Total protein concentrations were determined with the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). A molar extinction coefficient (ε) of 17,700 M−1 cm−1 for p-nitrophenol (31) was used for the calculation of the number of micromoles of p-nitrophenol produced per microgram of protein.

(ii) ELISA.

The presence of toxins A and B in the culture supernatants was also tested with the Wampole C. difficile TOX A/B II assay (Technologies Lab, Blacksburg, VA). This assay was performed by the protocol provided by the manufacturer.

Cytotoxicity assay.

The effect of the culture supernatant on cytotoxicity was tested with the Bartels Clostridium difficile cytotoxicity assay kit (Trinity Biotech, Jamestown, NY). The protocol used was based on the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Briefly, human foreskin fibroblast cells were incubated for 24 to 48 h at 37°C with 48-h culture supernatant fluids collected from the wild-type 630 and R20291 strains and the respective agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 mutants. Cells were observed with an EVOS XL microscope (Advanced Microscopy Group, Bothell, WA).

Cell viability assay.

The culture supernatants from the wild-type 630 and R20291 strains and the respective agr mutants were tested for their effects on foreskin fibroblast cell viability with the CellTiter 96 Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Madison, WI). This assay measures the ability of living cells to convert tetrazolium salt into a blue formazan product, which can be measured with a spectrophotometer. Ready-made human foreskin fibroblast cells (Trinity Biotech, Jamestown, NY) in 150 µl of medium were treated with 50 µl of culture supernatant fluids from the wild-type and agr mutant strains and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Following the incubation period, 100 µl of the supernatant was removed and replaced with 15 µl of the dye solution and the cells were incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Solubilization Stop Mix Solution (100 µl) was then added and mixed thoroughly to obtain a uniformly colored solution. Absorbance at 570 nm was measured. A reference wavelength of 650 nm was used to reduce background noise contributed by cell debris and other nonspecific absorbance.

Allelic-exchange-based deletion of the agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 loci.

The allele exchange cassette used for deletion of the agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 loci from the 630 and R20291 strains were constructed in pUC57. To create the cassette for the agrB1D1 locus, 1,527- and 923-bp sequences homologous to the DNA sequences flanking the upstream and downstream regions of the locus, respectively, were amplified with primers RH-AGRB1D1-F, RH-AGRB1D1-R, LH-AGRB1D1-F, and LH-AGRB1D1-R (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). SacI and KasI recognition sequences were incorporated into the primers at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the 1,527 bp upstream of the locus. The 923-bp sequences downstream of the locus also contained KasI and BamHI recognition sequences at the 5′ and 3′ ends. PCR amplification was performed with OneTaq Quickload PCR Mastermix (NEB, Ipswich, MA) and genomic DNA from the 630 or R20291 strain. The PCR fragments were assembled in plasmid pUC57 by using the Sac1 and BamHI sites. The assembled left and right flanking regions of the agrB1D1 locus were inserted into replication-defective C. difficile vector pMTL82151 (kindly provided by Alexandra Faulds-Pain) by using the Sac1 and BamHI sites, resulting in allelic-exchange cassette pAgrB1D1. For the agrB2D2 cassette, 1,118- and 939-bp regions upstream and downstream of the agrB2D2 locus were amplified with primers LH-AgrA2-F, LH-AgrA2-R, RH-AgrB2D2-F, and RH-AgrB2D2-R containing Sac1, Kas1, and BamHI restriction sites. The amplified fragments were assembled in the pBSK(+) Simple-Amp vector and subsequently cloned into pMTL82151, resulting in allelic-exchange cassette pAgrB2D2. Both the pAgrB1D1 and pAgrB2D2 assembled allelic-exchange cassettes were sequenced to confirm the absence of unintended mutations.

To generate the deletion mutants, C. difficile R20291 and 630 cells were incubated with conjugative Escherichia coli CA434 cells bearing either the pAgrB1D1 or the pAgrB2D2 allelic-exchange vector. The conjugants were plated on Cdifftox agar plates (29) without 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside but containing 250 µg/ml d-cycloserine, 8 µg/ml cefoxitin, and 50 µg/ml chloramphenicol. Conjugative E. coli CA434 cannot grow in the presence of d-cycloserine and cefoxitin, and so they were eliminated. Transconjugants were pooled and subcultured three times on the selective medium to obtain single-crossover clones. To allow more opportunity for the second recombination event to occur and to obtain double-crossover clones, the single-crossover clones were serially subcultured without chloramphenicol selection for 10 consecutive days. Double-crossover recombinants were identified by replica plating colonies onto nonselective BHI and BHI medium with chloramphenicol to screen for the loss of the plasmid-specific antibiotic resistance marker. Deletion of the agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 loci from the double-crossover clones was confirmed by PCR and sequencing 200 bp upstream and downstream of the fusion joint. The confirmation primers used were B1D1DelCon1-F and B1D1DelCon1-R for agrB1D1 locus deletion and B2D2-CON-F and B2D2-CON-R for the agrB2D2 locus. The PCR confirmation was performed with OneTaq Quick-Load 2× master mix (New England Biolabs) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 30 s and 36 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 120 s. The PCR products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide.

For complementation studies, the entire regions of the agrB1D1 and agrB2D2 loci were PCR amplified from wild-type R20291 and 630 DNA templates with oligonucleotides containing EcoRI and XbaI restriction sites (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The digested PCR product was inserted into pMTL84151 (kindly provided by Alexandra Faulds-Pain). The plasmid was confirmed by DNA sequencing and conjugated into C. difficile R20291 and 630 agrB1D1 mutants as described above. DNA sequencing was performed at Lone Star Labs (Houston, TX).

Immunoblot analysis.

Culture supernatant fluids from 48-h cultures of the agr mutants and the wild type were concentrated with the Pierce 150-kDa Concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL), and total protein concentrations were determined with the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). The concentrated supernatant fluids (100-µg protein each) were separated by 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred onto a 0.45-µm nitrocellulose membrane (Fisher Scientific Inc.) with a Trans-Blot cell (Bio-Rad) transfer apparatus. The membrane was blocked overnight in 10 mM Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST) containing 5% skim milk. Following blocking, the membrane was incubated with mouse monoclonal antibodies specific for C. difficile toxins A and B (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Blots were washed three times (5 min each) in TBST between incubations. The Protein Detector Western blot BCIP/NBT kit (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD) was then used to probe the membrane for the presence of each toxin with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody, followed by incubation with the BCIP/NBT substrate, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Analysis of mutants for transcription of tcdA and tcdB by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

The 630 and R20291 agr mutants at an optical density at 600 nm of 0.6 were diluted 1:100 in 30 ml of reduced BHI or TY medium and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 16 h. Total RNA was isolated with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s directions. The total RNA (1 µg of each) was converted to cDNA by reverse transcription with the ProtoScript AMV First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Relative expression levels of tcdA and tcdB transcripts were determined with SYBR green JumpStart Taq Ready Mix (Sigma), gene-specific primers (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), and 2 µl of cDNA. The SYBR green reaction mixtures contained each primer at 500 nM in a final volume of 20 µl. Known tcdA and tcdB DNA samples were used as standards. Comparative threshold cycle analysis was performed, and the mean expression levels obtained with three biological replicates. The absolute quantitative method was used to calculate the levels of tcdA and tcdB transcripts. Controls included the rpoB gene as an internal control and samples of the RNA preparation processed without the reverse transcription step, which uniformly yielded no detectable SYBR green signal.

The murine CDI model.

Seven-week-old C57BL/6 mice (both males and females) were given a cocktail of antibiotics (32) for 5 days in their drinking water. The antibiotics were kanamycin (40 mg/kg), gentamicin (3.5 mg/kg), colistin (4.2 mg/kg), metronidazole (21.5 mg/kg), and vancomycin (4.5 mg/kg). One day after the antibiotic treatment, the mice were given 1 mg of clindamycin by oral gavage. About 24 h following clindamycin treatment, the mice were infected with 108 viable spores of the agrB1D1 mutant, the complemented mutant, or the wild-type strain in a suspension of 250 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) by oral gavage. The animals were observed twice daily for 14 days postinfection. An endpoint scoring system was devised and used to evaluate the animals. A scoring chart based on three main parameters ([i] diarrhea, hunched posture, and physical appearance; [i] movement and response to external stimulus; and [iii] weight loss [described below]), was used to determine the endpoint. Diarrhea, hunched posture, and physical appearance were scored as follows: 0, normal (good hair coat, normal posture, frequent grooming, no discharge from the eyes or nose); 1, hunched posture and infrequent grooming; 2, hunched posture, no grooming (ruffled hair), distended stomach, and diarrhea (noticeable dehydration). Movement and response to external stimuli were scored as follows: 0, normal (normal activity, alertness, response to stimuli, usual eating and drinking); 1, reduced movement, reduced alertness, reduced response to stimuli, or uncoordinated movement; 2, no movement, no activity, no eating, no drinking or alertness. Body weight changes were scored as follows: 0, normal (normal food consumption with normal urine and fecal output); 1, 5 to 15% loss of body weight; 2, 15 to 20% loss of body weight. Animals that were assessed an endpoint score of 2 for any of the above three parameters during the 14-day observation period were euthanized.

Pellets collected from the mice on day 5 postinfection were tested for the presence of toxins A and B with the Wampole C. difficile TOX A/B II assay (Technologies Lab, Blacksburg, VA). Briefly, one to three stool pellets or watery diarrheal stool samples were collected from the anal region of each mouse, weighed, suspended in 250 µl of sterile PBS, and centrifuged at 10,000 × g. ELISA of the supernatant was performed, whereas the pellet was evaluated for the number of CFU by resuspension of the pellet in BHI, dilution, and plating on Cdifftox agar plates.

Data analysis.

All of the data were analyzed and plotted with GraphPad Prism version 6.07 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The Student t test was used to compare differences between samples. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze the survival of the animals. In all cases, statistical significance was defined as a P value of <0.05.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Figure S1 

The C. difficile accessory gene regulator loci showing the location of the region deleted by allelic exchange. The agr1 locus in strains 630 (A) and R20291 (B) and the agr2 locus in strain R20291 (C) are shown. Download

Figure S2 

(A) Western blot analysis of 48-h culture supernatant fluid from the 630 agrB1D1 mutant. Supernatant from a 48-h culture was concentrated with the Pierce 150-kDa concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL) and subjected to 6% PAGE. The protein bands were transferred onto a 0.45-µm nitrocellulose membrane and probed with monoclonal antibodies specific for toxins A and B. The toxin bands on the transferred membrane were detected with the Protein Detector Western blot BCIP/NBT kit (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD). I, wild type; II, agrB1D1 mutant. (B) The agr1 deletion abolishes toxin production in both the 630 (B) and R20291 (C) strains. The agrB1D1 mutants of both strains and a agrB2D2 mutant of the R20291 strain were incubated in BHI medium for 48 h anaerobically at 37°C. Toxin production was tested by ELISA with the Wampole C. difficile TOX A/B II assay (Technologies Lab, Blacksburg, VA). agrB1D1 Mut, agrB1D1 deletion mutant; agrB1D1 Mut+Comp, agrB1D1 mutant complemented with a plasmid bearing the wild-type agrB1D1 locus; agrB2D2 Mut, agrB2D2 deletion mutant. There were significant differences (P = 0.0023 for 630 and 0.0001 for R20291) between the amounts of toxins produced by the wild-type and agrB1D1 mutant strains. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three independent experiments. Download

Figure S3 

The agr1 mutants do not produce toxin in TY medium. agrB1D1 mutants of both strains and the R20291 agrB2D2 mutant strain were incubated in TY medium for 48 h anaerobically at 37°C. Toxin production was detected with the Cdifftox activity assay. agrB2D2 Mut, R20291 agrB2D2 mutant; agrB1D1 Mut, agrB1D1 mutant. There was a significant difference (P = 0.003 for 630 and 0.0001 for R20291) between the levels of toxin activity produced by the wild-type and agrB1D1 mutant strains. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three independent experiments. Download

Figure S4 

The R20291 agrB2D2 mutant produces an active TI signal that restores toxin production in 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants unable to make toxins. 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutant strains were incubated in BHI medium anaerobically for 24 h in the presence of the TI signal purified from the R20291 agrB2D2 mutant. Toxin activity was detected with the Cdifftox activity assay (A), and toxin production was tested by nonquantitative ELISA (B) with the Wampole C. difficile TOX A/B II assay (Technologies Lab, Blacksburg, VA). agrB1D1 Mut, agrB1D1 deletion mutant; TI, TI signal. There were significant differences (P = 0.0041 for 630 and 0.0001 for R20291) between the amounts of toxins produced by the wild-type and agrB1D1 mutant strains in the absence of the TI signal. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three independent experiments. Download

Table S1 

Primers used in this study.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by NIH R01 grant R01AI116914, the Molecular Basis of Infectious Diseases Training Grant from the NIH Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI055449), and the Gillson-Longenbaugh Foundation.

We thank Heidi Kaplan (University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas) for the useful discussions and Alexandra Faulds-Pain (Department of Pathogen Molecular Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom) for kindly providing the pMTL82151 and pMTL84151 plasmids used in this study.

Funding Statement

The work was also funded by the Gillson-Longenbaugh Foundation.

Footnotes

Citation Darkoh C, Odo C, DuPont HL. 2016. Accessory gene regulator-1 locus is essential for virulence and pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile. mBio 7(4):e01237-16. doi:10.1128/mBio.01237-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC, Pepin J, Wilcox MH; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America . 2010. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 31:431–455. doi: 10.1086/651706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bartlett JG, Perl TM. 2005. The new Clostridium difficile—what does it mean? N Engl J Med 353:2503–2505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Millan B, Park H, Hotte N, Mathieu O, Burguiere P, Tompkins TA, Kao D, Madsen KL. 2016. Fecal microbial transplants reduce antibiotic-resistant genes in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 62:1479–1486. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hansen D, Pollan LD, Fernando H.. 2013. Fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis: a complication of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:1880–1885. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burke KE, Lamont JT. 2013. Fecal transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in older adults: a review. J Am Geriatr Soc 61:1394–1398. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rupnik M, Brazier JS, Duerden BI, Grabnar M, Stubbs SL. 2001. Comparison of toxinotyping and PCR ribotyping of Clostridium difficile strains and description of novel toxinotypes. Microbiology 147:439–447. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-2-439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Geric B, Rupnik M, Gerding DN, Grabnar M, Johnson S.. 2004. Distribution of Clostridium difficile variant toxinotypes and strains with binary toxin genes among clinical isolates in an American Hospital. J Med Microbiol 53:887–894. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45610-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Voth DE, Ballard JD. 2005. Clostridium difficile toxins: mechanism of action and role in disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 18:247–263. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.2.247-263.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kuehne SA, Cartman ST, Heap JT, Kelly ML, Cockayne A, Minton NP. 2010. The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile infection. Nature 467:711–713. doi: 10.1038/nature09397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Janzon L, Löfdahl S, Arvidson S.. 1989. Identification and nucleotide sequence of the delta-lysin gene, hld, adjacent to the accessory gene regulator (agr) of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Gen Genet 219:480–485. doi: 10.1007/BF00259623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huelsenbeck SC, May M, Schmidt G, Genth H.. 2009. Inhibition of cytokinesis by Clostridium difficile toxin B and cytotoxic necrotizing factors—reinforcing the critical role of RhoA in cytokinesis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 66:967–975. doi: 10.1002/cm.20390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rutherford ST, Bassler BL. 2012. Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2:e01237-16. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Novick RP, Geisinger E.. 2008. Quorum sensing in staphylococci. Annu Rev Genet 42:541–564. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Geisinger E, George EA, Chen J, Muir TW, Novick RP. 2008. Identification of ligand specificity determinants in AgrC, the Staphylococcus aureus quorum-sensing receptor. J Biol Chem 283:8930–8938. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M710227200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Novick RP, Projan SJ, Kornblum J, Ross HF, Ji G, Kreiswirth B, Vandenesch F, Moghazeh S.. 1995. The agr P2 operon: an autocatalytic sensory transduction system in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Gen Genet 248:446–458. doi: 10.1007/BF02191645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Darkoh C, DuPont HL, Norris SJ, Kaplan HB. 2015. Toxin synthesis by Clostridium difficile is regulated through quorum signaling. mBio 6:e02569-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02569-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Faulds-Pain A, Wren BW. 2013. Improved bacterial mutagenesis by high-frequency allele exchange, demonstrated in Clostridium difficile and Streptococcus suis. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:4768–4771. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01195-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Genth H, Dreger SC, Huelsenbeck J, Just I.. 2008. Clostridium difficile toxins: more than mere inhibitors of Rho proteins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 40:592–597. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Darkoh C, Brown EL, Kaplan HB, DuPont HL. 2013. Bile salt inhibition of host cell damage by Clostridium difficile toxins. PLoS One 8:e79631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Buckley AM, Spencer J, Candlish D, Irvine JJ, Douce GR. 2011. Infection of hamsters with the UK Clostridium difficile ribotype 027 outbreak strain R20291. J Med Microbiol 60:1174–1180. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.028514-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RC Jr., Kazakova SV, Sambol SP, Johnson S, Gerding DN. 2005. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 353:2433–2441. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Loo VG, Poirier L, Miller MA, Oughton M, Libman MD, Michaud S, Bourgault AM, Nguyen T, Frenette C, Kelly M, Vibien A, Brassard P, Fenn S, Dewar K, Hudson TJ, Horn R, René P, Monczak Y, Dascal A.. 2005. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med 353:2442–2449. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Petrella LA, Sambol SP, Cheknis A, Nagaro K, Kean Y, Sears PS, Babakhani F, Johnson S, Gerding DN. 2012. Decreased cure and increased recurrence rates for Clostridium difficile infection caused by the epidemic C. difficile BI strain. Clin Infect Dis 55:351–357. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Redelings MD, Sorvillo F, Mascola L.. 2007. Increase in Clostridium difficile-related mortality rates, United States, 1999–2004. Emerg Infect Dis 13:1417–1419. doi: 10.3201/eid1309.061116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.O’Brien JA, Lahue BJ, Caro JJ, Davidson DM. 2007. The emerging infectious challenge of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in Massachusetts hospitals: clinical and economic consequences. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 28:1219–1227. doi: 10.1086/522676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ananthakrishnan AN. 2011. Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, risk factors and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:17–26. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gerding DN, Meyer T, Lee C, Cohen SH, Murthy UK, Poirier A, Van Schooneveld TC, Pardi DS, Ramos A, Barron MA, Chen H, Villano S.. 2015. Administration of spores of nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile strain M3 for prevention of recurrent C. difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:1719–1727. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Martin MJ, Clare S, Goulding D, Faulds-Pain A, Barquist L, Browne HP, Pettit L, Dougan G, Lawley TD, Wren BW. 2013. The agr locus regulates virulence and colonization genes in Clostridium difficile 027. J Bacteriol 195:3672–3681. doi: 10.1128/JB.00473-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Darkoh C, Dupont HL, Kaplan HB. 2011. Novel one-step method for detection and isolation of active-toxin-producing Clostridium difficile strains directly from stool samples. J Clin Microbiol 49:4219–4224. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01033-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Darkoh C, Kaplan HB, Dupont HL. 2011. Harnessing the glucosyltransferase activities of Clostridium difficile for functional studies of toxins A and B. J Clin Microbiol 49:2933–2941. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00037-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shikita M, Fahey JW, Golden TR, Holtzclaw WD, Talalay P.. 1999. An unusual case of “uncompetitive activation” by ascorbic acid: purification and kinetic properties of a myrosinase from Raphanus sativus seedlings. Biochem J 341:725–732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen X, Katchar K, Goldsmith JD, Nanthakumar N, Cheknis A, Gerding DN, Kelly CP. 2008. A mouse model of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology 135:1984–1992. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1 

The C. difficile accessory gene regulator loci showing the location of the region deleted by allelic exchange. The agr1 locus in strains 630 (A) and R20291 (B) and the agr2 locus in strain R20291 (C) are shown. Download

Figure S2 

(A) Western blot analysis of 48-h culture supernatant fluid from the 630 agrB1D1 mutant. Supernatant from a 48-h culture was concentrated with the Pierce 150-kDa concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL) and subjected to 6% PAGE. The protein bands were transferred onto a 0.45-µm nitrocellulose membrane and probed with monoclonal antibodies specific for toxins A and B. The toxin bands on the transferred membrane were detected with the Protein Detector Western blot BCIP/NBT kit (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD). I, wild type; II, agrB1D1 mutant. (B) The agr1 deletion abolishes toxin production in both the 630 (B) and R20291 (C) strains. The agrB1D1 mutants of both strains and a agrB2D2 mutant of the R20291 strain were incubated in BHI medium for 48 h anaerobically at 37°C. Toxin production was tested by ELISA with the Wampole C. difficile TOX A/B II assay (Technologies Lab, Blacksburg, VA). agrB1D1 Mut, agrB1D1 deletion mutant; agrB1D1 Mut+Comp, agrB1D1 mutant complemented with a plasmid bearing the wild-type agrB1D1 locus; agrB2D2 Mut, agrB2D2 deletion mutant. There were significant differences (P = 0.0023 for 630 and 0.0001 for R20291) between the amounts of toxins produced by the wild-type and agrB1D1 mutant strains. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three independent experiments. Download

Figure S3 

The agr1 mutants do not produce toxin in TY medium. agrB1D1 mutants of both strains and the R20291 agrB2D2 mutant strain were incubated in TY medium for 48 h anaerobically at 37°C. Toxin production was detected with the Cdifftox activity assay. agrB2D2 Mut, R20291 agrB2D2 mutant; agrB1D1 Mut, agrB1D1 mutant. There was a significant difference (P = 0.003 for 630 and 0.0001 for R20291) between the levels of toxin activity produced by the wild-type and agrB1D1 mutant strains. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three independent experiments. Download

Figure S4 

The R20291 agrB2D2 mutant produces an active TI signal that restores toxin production in 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutants unable to make toxins. 630 and R20291 agrB1D1 mutant strains were incubated in BHI medium anaerobically for 24 h in the presence of the TI signal purified from the R20291 agrB2D2 mutant. Toxin activity was detected with the Cdifftox activity assay (A), and toxin production was tested by nonquantitative ELISA (B) with the Wampole C. difficile TOX A/B II assay (Technologies Lab, Blacksburg, VA). agrB1D1 Mut, agrB1D1 deletion mutant; TI, TI signal. There were significant differences (P = 0.0041 for 630 and 0.0001 for R20291) between the amounts of toxins produced by the wild-type and agrB1D1 mutant strains in the absence of the TI signal. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three independent experiments. Download

Table S1 

Primers used in this study.


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES