Skip to main content
Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
letter
. 2016 Sep;22(9):1677–1679. doi: 10.3201/eid2209.160446

Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Mycoplasma genitalium, Southwestern France

Chloé Le Roy 1,2,3, Nadège Hénin 1,2,3, Sabine Pereyre 1,2,3, Cécile Bébéar 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC4994369  PMID: 27533360

To the Editor: Mycoplasma genitalium is a sexually transmitted bacterium involved in nongonococcal urethritis in men and associated with cervicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease in women. Azithromycin regimens have been commonly used as a first-line treatment of these conditions, but a recent increase in M. genitalium with azithromycin resistance has been described worldwide; in 2012, resistance in the organism was detected in France at a prevalence of 14% (1). In case of azithromycin failure, moxifloxacin is a second-line treatment; however, moxifloxacin treatment failures have also been reported and are associated with mutations in ParC or GyrA (2).

Prevalence of M. genitalium infection was ≈4% in 2013–2014 at Bordeaux University Hospital (Bordeaux, France). To evaluate the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. genitalium in southwestern France, we examined the quinolone resistance–determining regions (QRDRs) of the gyrA and parC genes in M. genitalium–positive specimens obtained during 2013–2014. We retrospectively collected (from the Department of Bacteriology, Bordeaux University Hospital) 369 M. genitalium–positive urogenital specimens and DNA extracts from 344 patients. The gyrA and parC QRDRs were amplified and sequenced as described (3,4). We also assayed macrolide resistance–associated mutations using real-time PCR and melting curve analysis (1). To determine resistant genotypes A2058G or A2059G, we sequenced PCR products. Nucleotide positions in the 23S rRNA and amino acid positions in GyrA and ParC were identified according to Escherichia coli numbering.

From the 344 M. genitalium–positive patients, 200 specimens underwent complete analysis for the gyrA and parC genes, specimens from 221 patients were investigated for macrolide resistance, and specimens from 168 patients were examined for 23S rRNA, gyrA, and parC genes. Unsuccessful amplifications could be attributed to low bacterial loads of M. genitalium or to the degradation of frozen DNA during storage. Strains from 12/200 patients (6%; 95% CI 3.47%–10.19%) had QRDR mutations, with rates of 6.4% (6/93) for 2013 and 5.6% (6/107) for 2014. This prevalence is in accordance with the 4.5% moxifloxacin resistance described in the United Kingdom in 2011 (3) but lower than prevalences found in small numbers of strains in Japan and Australia during 2006–2014, which ranged from 10% to 47% (48).

Strains from 11 patients (patient nos. 6, 8, 12, 20, 23, 28–31, 46, 47) harbored alterations in the ParC QRDR (Table) at positions 80 (Ser→Asn or Ile) or 84 (Asp-84→Tyr or Asn). These mutations have been previously described for M. genitalium (4,68). In addition, 1 new amino acid alteration, Asn-96→Ser (strain from patient 20), was found in ParC. We detected a GyrA modification with the Ala-93→Thr transition in a strain from 1 patient (patient 3). These 2 amino acid changes were not previously reported; however, mutations at the next positions (97 in ParC and 95 in GyrA) have been described for M. genitalium (4,7), and these positions are within the QRDRs, suggesting their involvement in fluoroquinolone resistance. As previously described, M. genitalium ParC alterations predominate over GyrA alterations.

Table. Fluoroquinolone resistance–associated amino acid changes in GyrA and ParC and macrolide resistance–associated mutations in the 23S rRNA gene in Mycoplasma genitalium, France, 2013–2014*.

Patient no. Date of collection Patient sex Specimen type Mutation in the 23S rRNA gene Amino acid changes in
GyrA ParC
1 2013 Jan 9 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G NA NA
2 2013 Feb 1 F Vaginal swab A2058G
3 2013 Feb 1 M Urethral swab A2058G/A2059G Ala-93→Thr
4 2013 Feb 18 M Urethral swab A2058G/A2059G
5 2013 Feb 20 M Urine A2058G/A2059G
6 2013 Mar 11 M Urine A2058G/A2059G Asp-84→Tyr
7 2013 Mar 28 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G NA
8 2013 Apr 3 M Urine Wild-type Asp-84→Tyr
9 2013 Apr 8 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G
10 2013 Apr 11 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G NA NA
11 2013 Apr 16 F Vaginal swab A2058G NA
12 2013 Apr 19 F Vaginal swab Wild-type Ser-80→Asn
13 2013 May 21 M Urethral swab A2059G
14 2013 Jul 4 M Urine A2059G
15 2013 Jul 4 M Urethral swab A2059G
2013 Jul 19 M Urine A2059G
16 2013 Jul 19 M Urine A2058G
17 2013 Aug 9 F Vaginal swab A2059G NA
18 2013 Sep 30 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G
19 2013 Sep 30 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G
20 2013 Oct 29 F Vaginal swab Wild-type Asn-96→Ser
21 2013 Nov 22 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G NA NA
22 2013 Nov 29 F Vaginal swab A2062T
23 2013 Dec 1 F Vaginal swab Wild-type Asp-84→Tyr
24 2014 Jan 21 F Vaginal swab A2059G
25 2014 Jan 29 F Vaginal swab A2059G
26 2014 Jan 30 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G NA
27 2014 Feb 13 F Vaginal swab A2059G
28 2014 Feb 18 M Urine Wild-type Ser-80→Ile
29 2014 Feb 24 F Vaginal swab Wild-type Asp-84→Asn
30 2014 Mar 5 F Vaginal swab Wild-type Asp-84→Asn
31 2014 Mar 14 M Urine NA Ser-80→Asn
32 2014 Apr 3 F Endocervical swab A2058G
33 2014 Apr 7 M Urethral swab A2059G
34 2014 Jun 24 F Vaginal swab A2059C
35 2014 Jul 9 F Endocervical swab A2059G NA
36 2014 Jul 25 F Urine A2058G/A2059G NA NA
37 2014 Jul 25 F Vaginal swab A2058G
38 2014 Aug 19 F Endocervical swab A2062T NA
39 2014 Aug 28 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G
40 2014 Sep 24 F Vaginal swab A2059G
41 2014 Oct 7 F Vaginal swab A2059G
42 2014 Oct 15 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G
43 2014 Oct 31 M Urine A2058G
44 2014 Nov 5 F Vaginal swab A2058G/A2059G NA
45 2014 Nov 28 F Vaginal swab A2058G
46 2014 Dec 3 F Vaginal swab Wild-type Asp-84→Asn
47 2014 Dec 3 M Urethral swab Wild-type Asp-84→Asn
48
2014 Dec 4
M
Urine
A2059G


*A2058/A2059G indicates a macrolide–resistant (A2058G or A2059G) genotype. Positions in the 23S rRNA and in GyrA and ParC are identified according to Escherichia coli numbering. NA, not available; –, no amino acid change.

None of the 12 patients with strain parC or gyrA mutations had a history of fluoroquinolone treatment. Six patients received no treatment; 4 patients received azithromycin (1 g); 2 patients received extended azithromycin (1.5 g), 1 patient after azithromycin (1 g) failure, and 1 after receiving doxycycline for 7 days. Therapeutic outcomes were not available except for 1 patient, who experienced clinical failure after 2 azithromycin treatments.

Regarding macrolide resistance, 38 of 221 patients (17.20%; 95% CI 12.79%–22.72%) had M. genitalium with macrolide resistance–associated 23S rRNA mutations; prevalence was 17% (19/112) for 2013 and 17.4% (19/109) for 2014. This prevalence is increasing compared to that described in France in 2012 (14%). We found 35 A→G substitutions at position 2058 or 2059, two A2062T mutations and one A2059C mutation (Table) (1,9). Notably, in patients 15 and 33, who were infected with strains with macrolide resistance–associated mutations, M. genitalium infection was unsuccessfully treated with azithromycin, with treatment failures after azithromycin (1 g) and extended azithromycin (1.5 g for 5 d), but moxifloxacin treatment was effective. Patient 15 had been treated 1 year earlier with azithromycin (1 g) for nongonococcal urethritis.

Among the 168 patients whose isolates were examined for the 23S rRNA, gyrA, and parC genes, strains from 2 patients (patients 3 and 6) had both macrolide- and fluoroquinolone-associated mutations (1.2%; 95% CI 0.33%–4.24%). Both patients received azithromycin (1 g), and patient 6 received additional azithromycin (1.5 g) after failure of azithromycin (1 g). Patient 6 experienced azithromycin failure again after the extended regimen. M. genitalium multidrug resistance is described in France at a prevalence of 1.2%, lower than prevalence described in Australia (7.5%) (7) and Japan (30.8%) (10).

In conclusion, M. genitalium fluoroquinolone resistance is emerging in France, with a prevalence of 6% in 2013–2014. Further, macrolide resistance also increased during this period, to a rate of 17.2%. Patients infected with M. genitalium strains containing both macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance mutations associated with therapeutic failure raise concerns about untreatable M. genitalium infections.

Acknowledgments

We thank Manon Zerbib and Manon Passard for technical assistance.

Footnotes

Suggested citation for this article: Le Roy C, Hénin N, Pereyre S, Bébéar C. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium, southwestern France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Sep [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2209.160446

References

  • 1.Touati A, Peuchant O, Jensen JS, Bébéar C, Pereyre S. Direct detection of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium isolates from clinical specimens from France by use of real-time PCR and melting curve analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:1549–55. 10.1128/JCM.03318-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Couldwell DL, Tagg KA, Jeoffreys NJ, Gilbert GL. Failure of moxifloxacin treatment in Mycoplasma genitalium infections due to macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance. Int J STD AIDS. 2013;24:822–8. 10.1177/0956462413502008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pond MJ, Nori AV, Witney AA, Lopeman RC, Butcher PD, Sadiq ST. High prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium in nongonococcal urethritis: the need for routine testing and the inadequacy of current treatment options. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:631–7. 10.1093/cid/cit752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shimada Y, Deguchi T, Nakane K, Masue T, Yasuda M, Yokoi S, et al. Emergence of clinical strains of Mycoplasma genitalium harbouring alterations in ParC associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36:255–8. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deguchi T, Yasuda M, Horie K, Seike K, Kikuchi M, Mizutani K, et al. Drug resistance-associated mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium in female sex workers, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:1062–4. 10.3201/eid2106.142013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bissessor M, Tabrizi SN, Twin J, Abdo H, Fairley CK, Chen MY, et al. Macrolide resistance and azithromycin failure in a Mycoplasma genitalium–infected cohort and response of azithromycin failures to alternative antibiotic regimens. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:1228–36. 10.1093/cid/ciu1162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tagg KA, Jeoffreys NJ, Couldwell DL, Donald JA, Gilbert GL. Fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance-associated mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2245–9. 10.1128/JCM.00495-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kikuchi M, Ito S, Yasuda M, Tsuchiya T, Hatazaki K, Takanashi M, et al. Remarkable increase in fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:2376–82 . 10.1093/jac/dku164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jensen JS, Bradshaw CS, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Hamasuna R. Azithromycin treatment failure in Mycoplasma genitalium-positive patients with nongonococcal urethritis is associated with induced macrolide resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1546–53. 10.1086/593188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Deguchi T, Kikuchi M, Yasuda M, Ito S. Multidrug-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium is increasing. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:405–6. 10.1093/cid/civ898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES