Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroendocrinol. 2014 Oct;26(10):685–696. doi: 10.1111/jne.12176

Functional Significance of Hormonal Changes in Mammalian Fathers

Wendy Saltzman 1,*, Toni E Ziegler 2
PMCID: PMC4995091  NIHMSID: NIHMS808784  PMID: 25039657

Abstract

In the 5–10% of mammals in which both parents routinely provide infant care, fathers as well as mothers undergo systematic endocrine changes as they transition into parenthood. Although fatherhood-associated changes in such hormones and neuropeptides as prolactin, testosterone, glucocorticoids, vasopressin, and oxytocin have been characterised in only a small number of biparental rodents and primates, they appear to be more variable than corresponding changes in mothers, and experimental studies typically have not provided strong or consistent evidence that these endocrine shifts play causal roles in the activation of paternal care. Consequently, their functional significance remains unclear. We propose that endocrine changes in mammalian fathers may enable males to meet the species-specific demands of fatherhood by influencing diverse aspects of their behaviour and physiology, similar to many effects of hormones and neuropeptides in mothers. We review the evidence for such effects, focusing on recent studies investigating whether mammalian fathers in biparental species undergo systematic changes in 1) energetics and body composition, 2) neural plasticity, cognition, and sensory physiology, and 3) stress responsiveness and emotionality, all of which may be mediated by endocrine changes. The few published studies, based on a small number of rodent and primate species, suggest that hormonal and neuropeptide alterations in mammalian fathers might mediate shifts in paternal energy balance, body composition, and neural plasticity, but do not appear to have major effects on stress responsiveness or emotionality. Further research is needed on a wider variety of biparental mammals, under more naturalistic conditions, to more fully elucidate the functional significance of hormone and neuropeptide profiles of mammalian fatherhood and to clarify how fatherhood may trade off with, or perhaps enhance, aspects of organismal function in biparental mammals.

Keywords: Biparental care, Paternal behaviour, Energy balance, Stress, Anxiety, Nurogenesis

Introduction

During the transition to motherhood, female mammals undergo a series of hormonal changes that prepare the body and brain for the myriad challenges of parenting. These hormonal changes involve predictable fluctuations in circulating concentrations of steroids (e.g., oestrogens, progestagens, androgens, glucocorticoids) as well as peptides (e.g., prolactin and other lactogenic hormones, oxytocin, vasopressin, gonadotrophins). Functional effects of these endocrine changes fall into three broad categories. First, they directly regulate the physiological processes in the mother necessary for the production and maintenance of offspring – i.e., pregnancy, parturition and lactation – through actions on the reproductive tract and accessory tissues. During gestation, for example, oestrogen and progesterone act on the uterus to regulate endometrial morphology and function, and thereby play a critical role in maintaining the pregnancy, whereas during lactation, prolactin and oxytocin act on the mammary glands to stimulate the synthesis and release of milk (13). Second, the so-called maternal hormones directly stimulate maternal behaviour through actions on the central nervous system. Importantly, these actions involve the same hormones involved in the physiological regulation of pregnancy, parturition, and lactation. Thus, oestrogen, progesterone, prolactin, and oxytocin, among other hormones and neuropeptides, all act within the brain to activate or, in some cases, inhibit the expression of maternal behaviour (4). Third, these same hormones and neuropeptides can indirectly facilitate maternal care and/or maternal survival via a host of centrally and/or peripherally mediated effects. For example, pregnancy and lactation are accompanied by changes in maternal energy balance (5, 6), immune function (7), neural plasticity (810), cognition (8, 11, 12), sensory physiology (12, 13), emotional regulation (11), and stress responsiveness (11, 14), and these alterations have been hypothesised, or in some cases demonstrated, to be mediated by the endocrine profile of motherhood.

Although the vast majority of mammalian fathers play no systematic role in infant care, males in approximately 5–10% of mammalian genera routinely help to rear their young (15, 16). Paternal care appears to have evolved independently multiple times among mammals, and is thought to evolve under conditions in which males are more likely to increase the number of offspring fathered and/or the likelihood of offspring survival by assisting with infant care than by abandoning their mates and seeking additional mating opportunities (15,16, 17). The largest numbers of biparental mammals have been identified among the rodents, primates, and carnivores (15). Depending on the species, paternal care in mammals can entail a broad range of behaviours involved in transporting, defending, playing with, socializing, grooming, and warming offspring, and providing them with food, shelter, or other resources (15). In some species, fathers spend at least as much time interacting with their offspring as do mothers, and paternal care can have important consequences for the survival, growth, and development of young (1618). Some components of paternal care may have considerable energetic costs (19) and may differ quantitatively and/or qualitatively from behaviour performed by nonbreeding males (17). In biparental mammals, therefore, the onset of fatherhood, like motherhood, can entail pronounced shifts in parents’ behaviour and physiology.

Not surprisingly, then, fathers in biparental species, like mothers, undergo systematic endocrine changes in association with the onset of parenthood. These changes, in such hormones and neuropeptides as prolactin, testosterone, and vasopressin, have been characterised to a greater or lesser extent in a number of rodent and primate species; however, their functions are not well understood (4, 20). Obviously, these endocrine events do not subserve obligatory changes in reproductive physiology comparable to pregnancy, parturition, and lactation in females (i.e., category 1, above). Therefore, their functional significance, if any, is likely to lie in either directly promoting paternal care (category 2) or indirectly facilitating paternal care or paternal survival through centrally and/or peripherally mediated effects that help fathers meet the demands of parenting (category 3). Over the last three decades, numerous investigators have used correlational or, less commonly, experimental approaches to evaluate possible effects of these fatherhood-induced endocrine changes on the expression of paternal behaviour (4, 20). Only in the last few years, however, have researchers begun to examine other possible effects of these hormonal and neurochemical changes as males undergo the transition to fatherhood. Thus, the extent to which the endocrine sequelae of fatherhood influence behaviour and physiology in fathers is still largely unknown.

In this paper we review the evidence – virtually all of which comes from rodents and primates – that suggests endocrine changes in mammalian fathers influence diverse aspects of fathers’ behaviour and physiology. First, we briefly describe the hormone and neuropeptide changes that have been reported to occur in biparental mammalian fathers. We next summarise the evidence that these endocrine and neurochemical events of fatherhood play a causal role in the activation of paternal care, emphasizing results from experimental studies. We then review recent findings that suggest mammalian fathers in biparental species may undergo systematic changes in 1) energetics and body composition, 2) neural plasticity, cognition, and sensory physiology, and 3) stress responsiveness and emotionality, all of which are likely mediated by endocrine changes. Finally, we discuss the limitations and implications of these findings, as well as future directions for studying the physiological and behavioural consequences of parenthood for mammalian fathers.

Hormonal changes in biparental mammalian fathers

Males in a number of biparental mammals – specifically, several rodent and primate species – have been shown to undergo changing hormonal profiles during their mates’ pregnancy and lactational periods. These changes appear to mimic the hormonal fluctuations that are occurring in their mates. Importantly, many of the endocrine changes in mammalian fathers are modulated by paternal experience (19, 21, 22). Hormonal changes in mammalian fathers have been reviewed elsewhere (e.g., (4, 20)) and therefore will be summarised only briefly here.

Prolactin

In biparental Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus; (23), California mice (Peromyscus californicus; (24) and Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus campbelli; (25), circulating prolactin concentrations are significantly higher in fathers living with their mate and pups than in virgin males, newly mated males, and/or expectant fathers. Moreover, male Djungarian hamsters have increased prolactin receptor mRNA transcript levels in the choroid plexus of the hypothalamus during their mate’s early postpartum period, indicating elevated prolactin activity in the brain during the period when males are interacting with pups (26).

Biparental male nonhuman primates also show increases in circulating or excreted prolactin levels during their mate’s gestational period, and even more pronounced prolactin elevations during the postpartum period, when fathers are directly involved in caring for infants. The cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), cooperatively breeding, biparental, New World monkeys, both show elevated prolactin levels during their mate’s pregnancy, with mid-gestational elevations and highest levels in the final month of pregnancy (tamarin: (27); marmoset: (28)). Once infants are born, fathers maintain significantly higher prolactin levels throughout the period of infant dependency than during the gestational phase (28, 29). Similarly, a recent study found that human fathers have significantly higher prolactin levels than other men (30).

Androgens

Testosterone generally shows a negative relationship with paternal care. In some biparental mammals, testosterone levels of expectant fathers rise across the mate’s pregnancy (e.g., cotton-top tamarin: (22); Djungarian hamster: (25). Following the birth of infants, however, paternal testosterone concentrations drop precipitously in biparental primate fathers, including common marmosets (28), cotton-top tamarins (31), and humans (32). Similarly, rodent fathers undergo pronounced declines in testosterone levels following the birth of their pups (e.g., Mongolian gerbil: (23); Djungarian hamster:(25); California mouse:(33)).

Oestrogen and progesterone

Few studies have characterised changes in oestrogen signalling in mammalian fathers, and in the small number of species that have been studied, no consistent picture has emerged. In male Djungarian hamsters, serum oestradiol levels do not appear to change with paternal status (34), and oestrogen receptor alpha-immunoreactivity in several brain regions (medial preoptic area, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), and medial amygdala) does not appear to differ between fathers and non-fathers (35). In contrast, mandarin vole (M. mandarinus) fathers have lower levels of oestrogen receptor alpha-immunoreactivity in the medial preoptic area and the BNST, and higher levels in the ventromedial hypothalamus, compared to non-fathers (36). Among the biparental primates, experienced, but not first-time, cotton-top tamarin fathers show significant increases in urinary oestrone and oestradiol concentrations in the final month of their mate’s gestation (31), and black-tufted ear marmoset (C. kuhlii) fathers show significant but transient drops in urinary oestradiol concentrations following the birth of their infants (37).

Findings on progesterone, like those on oestrogen, are sparse and inconsistent. Male Djungarian hamsters show a significant increase in progesterone levels at the end of the mate’s pregnancy (34), whereas progesterone levels in male California mice are significantly lower in fathers than in virgin males (33).

Glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoid (cortisol or corticosterone) levels rise during the mate’s mid- to late gestational period in expectant fathers of several biparental mammals, including Djungarian hamsters (25), cotton-top tamarins (31), and humans (38). Glucocorticoid levels decline again shortly after parturition, however, so that studies of basal glucocorticoid concentrations typically find no differences between fathers and non-breeding males (e.g., California mouse: (39, 40); prairie vole: (19); human: (41, 42)).

Vasopressin

Vasopressin in fathers has been studied most thoroughly in the prairie vole, with a strong emphasis on vasopressin signaling within the brain. In this species, new fathers have reduced densities of vasopressin-immunoreactive fibers in the lateral septum and lateral habenular nucleus compared to both sexually naïve males and males housed with late-pregnant mates; this finding appears to reflect increased synthesis and release of vasopressin from the BNST and medial amygdaloid nucleus following both copulation and parturition (43, 44). Prairie vole fathers (as well as mothers) also exhibit elevated vasopressin mRNA levels in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and supraoptic nucleus (SON) in the postpartum period compared to sexually naïve controls (45). In the California mouse, in contrast, vasopressin mRNA levels in the PVN do not differ between fathers and virgin males or males housed with tubally ligated females (46). In common marmosets, fathers have a greater abundance of vasopressin V1a receptors in the prefrontal cortex than males that have not sired offspring (47). Effects of fatherhood on vasopressin signalling therefore appear to differ across species and might be clarified by additional studies.

Oxytocin

Several studies have investigated changes in intracerebral oxytocin signalling or peripheral oxytocin concentrations in rodent fathers. In the facultatively biparental meadow vole, sexually and paternally experienced, paternally behaving males were found to have significantly higher oxytocin receptor binding in several brain regions (accessory olfactory nucleus, lateral septum, BNST, and lateral amygdala) than sexually and paternally inexperienced, non-paternally behaving males; however, it could not be determined, however, whether these neural differences were caused by differences in sexual activity, cohabitation with a female, and/or paternal experience (48). Similarly, fathers have increased numbers of oxytocin-immunoreactive fibers in the PVN and SON in biparental mandarin voles, compared to virgin males; however, similar effects were seen in non-fathers that were either exposed briefly to pups or housed with a female prior to parturition (36). Among biparental male prairie voles, in contrast, neither oxytocin gene expression in the hypothalamus nor oxytocin receptor binding in a number of brain regions was found to differ between sexually naïve males and new fathers (45). Male California mice exhibit elevated circulating oxytocin concentrations during the first half of their mate’s pregnancy, but oxytocin levels decline prior to parturition and remain low throughout the postpartum period (48); however, it is unclear whether circulating oxytocin levels reliably reflect levels in the brain (50). Thus, effects of fatherhood on the brain’s oxytocin system seem to be inconsistent across species, and where effects have been detected, they may correspond to cohabitation with a female rather than fatherhood per se.

In conclusion, whereas hormonal changes in mothers apparently evolved to subserve the physiological processes of gestation, parturition, and lactation, and thus appear to be broadly similar across eutherian mammals, hormonal changes in fathers are much less constrained. Not surprisingly, then, the endocrine profile of fatherhood is quite variable among the handful of biparental mammals that have been studied in detail. Although fathers in all or most of the species studied show increases in prolactin and decreases in testosterone concentrations during the mate’s perinatal period, changes in oestrogen, progesterone, vasopressin, and oxytocin signaling are less consistent.

Effects of hormonal changes in fathers on paternal behaviour

As described above, fathers in biparental mammalian species undergo species-specific changes in several hormone and neuropeptide systems as they prepare for and subsequently engage in paternal care. This has led to the hypothesis that these hormonal and neurochemical changes pay a role in the suppression of infanticidal behaviour and the activation of paternal behaviour (20, 51). Consequently, numerous studies have evaluated possible effects of these hormones and neuropeptides on males’ behavioural responses to infants, often relying on correlational analyses of hormone-behaviour relationships (reviewed by (4, 20)). Here we briefly review the evidence that suggests endocrine profiles of fatherhood play a causal role in activating paternal care, focusing primarily on experimental studies.

Prolactin

In contrast to numerous studies demonstrating positive correlations between circulating prolactin levels and paternal behaviour, pharmacological experiments generally do not support a causal role of prolactin in the onset or maintenance of paternal care (20). Roberts et al. (52) found that treatment of common marmosets with the dopamine receptor agonist bromocriptine to suppress prolactin secretion reduced retrieval of infants; however, this study used parentally inexperienced animals, most of which were females, rather than fathers. In contrast, in a study using experienced marmoset fathers, suppression of prolactin secretion using the dopamine D2 receptor agonist cabergoline caused no changes in infant-care behaviours during observations made within the family context (53). A more recent, longitudinal study provides further insights into the role of prolactin in marmoset paternal behaviour. Ziegler et al. (28) tested experienced common marmoset fathers across three consecutive litters, during which each father underwent treatment, in randomised order, with cabergoline, human recombinant prolactin, or nothing. Neither of the prolactin manipulations significantly altered fathers’ infant-carrying or other parenting behaviours within the family, but both significantly reduced fathers’ responsiveness to infant distress calls when fathers were tested away from the family.

Studies in rodents, similar to those in marmosets, have failed to yield compelling evidence that prolactin influences paternal care in biparental species. Although prolactin has been shown to promote paternal behaviour in the uniparental rat (Rattus norvegicus) (54), no such effect was found in biparental Djungarian hamsters, in which treatment of first-time fathers with either cabergoline or bromocriptine did not alter fathers’ pup-retrieval behaviour, or growth and survival of pups (55).

In conclusion, although prolactin is elevated in fathers of several biparental mammals and has been referred to as the “hormone of paternity” (56), findings from experimental studies provide little support for the hypothesis that prolactin plays a key role in activating paternal behaviour in male mammals. Instead, the role of prolactin in fathers before and during periods of infant care may be more closely related to some of its other known functions, such as increasing food intake, stimulating neurogenesis, and reducing anxiety.

Testosterone and oestrogen

Although circulating or excreted testosterone levels correlate negatively with measures of paternal behaviour in several mammals (reviewed by (4, 20)), experimental studies indicate that effects of testosterone on paternal care differ markedly across species. In the Djungarian hamster (57) and in one study of prairie voles (58), for example, castration had no detectable effect on paternal behaviour, whereas castrated male Mongolian gerbils engaged in significantly more paternal behaviour than either castrated, testosterone-treated males or sham-castrated males (59). The opposite pattern has been found in another study of prairie voles (60) and in California mice (61), in which castration reduced and testosterone treatment restored paternal behaviour. In the California mouse, this effect is mediated by aromatization of testosterone to oestrogen within the brain: paternal behaviour of castrated, reproductively experienced males was restored by treatment with testosterone or oestrogen, but not by treatment with the non-aromatizable androgen dihydrotestosterone (62). Moreover, fathers had higher aromatase activity within the medial preoptic area of the brain – a region strongly implicated in paternal behaviour (63, 64) – than non-fathers (33). Thus, even though California mouse fathers have lower circulating concentrations of testosterone than nonfathers, they might have higher local concentrations of oestrogen within the brain.

Progesterone

In the uniparental house mouse (Mus spp.), progesterone signalling has been shown to promote infanticide and inhibit paternal behaviour in adult males (65, 66). Progesterone receptor knockout mice as well as mice treated with the progesterone receptor antagonist RU486 showed markedly reduced aggression toward pups and enhanced paternal behaviour, whereas progesterone treatment of wild-type males significantly increased aggression toward pups. To our knowledge, however, effects of progesterone on paternal care have not been tested in biparental mammals.

Glucocorticoids

Very few studies have examined effects of glucocorticoids on paternal care. To characterise effects of acute glucocorticoid elevations, Harris et al. (67) injected California mouse fathers with high doses of corticosterone and found neither short-term effects on paternal behaviour nor longer-term effects on pup survival or development. Similarly, in free-ranging, cooperatively breeding meerkats (Suricata suricatta), glucocorticoid injections had no effect on provisioning of pups or time spent in proximity to pups in non-breeding male alloparents (68). To determine effects of chronic stress, including chronic elevations of circulating corticosterone levels, on paternal care, Harris et al. (69) subjected California mouse fathers to a chronic variable stress paradigm for 7 days. Stressed fathers showed both significant elevations in corticosterone levels and subtle reductions in their interactions with their mate and pups compared to control fathers, but no differences were detected in pup survival or development. These findings suggest that neither acute nor chronic glucocorticoid elevations have pronounced effects on parental or alloparental care males, but clearly, additional data are needed from other species.

Vasopressin

Both within and among species, paternal behaviour correlates with patterns of vasopressin-immunoreactivity and vasopressin binding, especially in the lateral septum and other parts of the “extended amygdala” (45, 48, 70, 71). Moreover, central infusion of vasopressin or vasopressin receptor antagonists promotes or inhibits paternal behaviour, respectively, in the biparental prairie vole (72) and in the facultatively biparental meadow vole (M. pennsylvanicus: (73)). Nonetheless, castration of male prairie voles virtually eliminates vasopressin-immunoreactivity in the lateral septum and lateral habenula but does not affect paternal behaviour, suggesting that vasopressin signalling in these areas is not essential for the expression of paternal care (58).

Oxytocin

Several experimental studies support a role of oxytocin in paternal behaviour. In humans, intranasal oxytocin treatment of fathers modulates several aspects of father-child interactions (7476); however, the extent to which intranasally administered oxytocin enters the brain and gains access to oxytocin-responsive regions is unclear (50). In virgin male prairie voles, paternal behaviour is inhibited by combined treatment with a vasopressin receptor antagonist and an oxytocin receptor antagonist, but not either antagonist alone (77). Finally, in free-ranging meerkats, peripheral injections of oxytocin increased adults’ feeding of pups and time spent in proximity to pups; however, this study included both breeding and non-breeding animals of both sexes, and, again, the extent to which oxytocin entered the brain is unknown (78). Further studies utilizing direct manipulation of intracerebral oxytocin signalling are needed in order to clarify the effects of the brain’s oxytocin system on paternal behaviour.

In summary, experimental studies provide limited and inconsistent support for the hypothesis that the hormone and neuropeptide changes occurring in mammalian fathers are important in the expression of paternal behaviour. What, then, can we conclude about the functional significance of parenthood-associated hormonal and neurochemical alterations in biparental mammalian fathers? Although the answer is still far from clear, we explore several possibilities below, based on known effects of these same hormones and neuropeptides in mammalian mothers, and on observed morphological, physiological, neurobiological, and behavioural changes in fathers.

Effects of fatherhood on energy balance and body composition

Female mammals show a direct relationship between reproduction and energy balance (79). Pregnancy and lactation are energetically expensive; without access to adequate calories, females will either terminate reproductive attempts or continue them at the expense of self-maintenance (80, 81). Several hormones are involved in the energetics of pregnancy and induce coordinated adaptations to physiological functions in the mother. In particular, prolactin and placental lactogen appear to be involved in the leptin resistance that occurs beginning at mid-pregnancy, and prolactin induces hyperphagia (82). Oestradiol increases energy utilization (83) but inhibits food intake (84), whereas progesterone increases food intake and body weight during pregnancy (85). During lactation, mild leptin resistance may persist, whereas sensitivity to ghrelin appears to increase, thereby stimulating hyperphagia (6, 86). Prolactin also acts centrally to stimulate hyperphagia during the lactational period, complemented by elevated basal levels of the orexigenic glucocorticoid hormones and low levels of the anorexigenic oestrogens (6). Thus, the endocrine changes in pregnancy and lactation provide signals to reset maternal homeostatic mechanisms, facilitating shifts in feeding behaviour and energy utilization to meet increased metabolic demands (6, 82).

Although males in biparental species obviously do not undergo pregnancy or lactation (with the exception of some species of fruit bats in which males lactate: (87)), hormonal changes in fathers nonetheless appear to interact with paternal homeostatic mechanisms, and males may show changes in body mass and body composition similar to those in their mates (Table 1). In two biparental primates, the common marmoset and the cotton-top tamarin, expectant fathers undergo significant weight gain, especially in the final month of the mate’s gestation, concurrent with elevations in prolactin concentrations (88, 89). Fathers engage in infant care beginning shortly after parturition, including extensive carrying of multiple infants, and lose weight during the period of infant dependency (28, 90). Prolactin has been shown to limit weight loss in common marmoset fathers in the first few weeks postpartum: fathers treated with the dopamine D2 receptor agonist cabergoline in order to lower their circulating prolactin levels lost significantly more weight during the infant-care period than males given prolactin implants (28). It is possible, therefore, that prolactin has orexigenic effects in fathers providing infant care, as in pregnant and lactating mothers.

Table 1.

Effects of fatherhood on energy balance and body composition in males of biparental mammalian species.

Dependent
Variable
Species Effect of Fatherhood Reference
Body mass Common
marmoset
Increase across mate’s pregnancy,
especially in final month; decrease during
period of infant care
28, 88
Body mass Cotton-top
tamarin
Increase across mate’s pregnancy,
especially in final month; decrease during
period of infant care
8890
Body mass California
mouse
Increase during mate’s pregnancy; decrease
during period of infant care
67
Body mass,
subcutaneous fat
Prairie vole Decrease during period of infant care 19

Similar to marmosets and tamarins, California mouse fathers show significant increases in body weight towards the end of their mate’s pregnancy, followed by weight loss during the postpartum period (67). Prairie vole fathers also lose weight while caring for pups, and undergo a significant loss of subcutaneous fat and a significant decline in plasma leptin concentrations (19). These morphological and endocrine changes in prairie vole fathers are associated with an increased preference for sucrose solution over water and increased time spent feeding, but no change in physical activity levels (19).

In summary, findings from biparental monkeys and rodents demonstrate that fathers undergo systematic decreases in body weight and, in at least one species, reductions in subcutaneous fat and circulating leptin levels while rearing infants, suggesting that providing paternal care is energetically costly. Importantly, these findings were obtained from captive animals housed under non-challenging conditions, with ample food, comfortable ambient temperatures, and an absence of predators. Studies of biparental mammals living in natural or semi-natural environments would likely reveal even more pronounced energetic costs of fatherhood.

Effects of fatherhood on neural plasticity, cognition, and olfaction

Reproduction in female mammals governs plasticity in the brain. During pregnancy and lactation, mothers undergo molecular, electrophysiological, neurochemical, and morphological changes in brain regions associated with the expression of maternal behaviour, as well as in regions involved in cognition, sensory processing, and emotional regulation (reviewed by (810, 12)). In recent years, particular interest has focused on effects of motherhood on neurogenesis. Neuronal proliferation in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus declines during the early lactational period in rats, mice, and sheep, compared to control females, and this effect appears to be mediated by hormonal and/or neurochemical events, including reductions in oestrogen and elevations in glucocorticoid levels. In contrast, in the subventricular zone, which produces neurones that migrate to the olfactory bulb, proliferation of neurones is enhanced during both pregnancy and lactation in rats and mice, as a result of stimulatory effects of prolactin, but is suppressed in lactating ewes (10). Although the functional significance of these motherhood-induced changes in neural plasticity is not yet known, they have been proposed to mediate changes in cognition (e.g., spatial memory), sensory processes (e.g., olfactory recognition of offspring), and emotional regulation (e.g., anxiety reduction) in mothers, potentially enhancing mothers’ ability to meet the demands of parenthood (810, 12).

In the past decade, a handful of studies have indicated that fatherhood, like motherhood, modulates plasticity in brain regions subserving cognitive, affective, and sensory functions (Table 2). Kozorovitskiy and colleagues (47) found that in the common marmoset, both first-time and experienced fathers had higher densities of dendritic spines on pyramidal neurones in the prefrontal cortex, a region involved in goal-directed behaviour, compared to age-matched males that had not sired offspring. The functional significance of this difference is not known.

Table 2.

Effects of fatherhood on neural plasticity, cognition, and olfaction in males of biparental mammalian species.

Dependent Variable
(Interpretation)
Species Effect of Fatherhood Reference
Density of dendritic spines on
pyramidal neurones in prefrontal
cortex (structural reorganization)
Common
marmoset
Increase 47
BrdUa-labelled neurones in
dentate gyrus (neurogenesis)
California mouse Decrease 91
BrdU-labelled neurones in
subventricular zone
(neurogenesis)
California mouse No effect 91
Performance in object-recognition
test and novelty-suppressed
feeding test (hippocampal
function)
California mouse No effect 91
Nestin, Ki-67, doublecortin, and
glial fibrillary acidic protein in
hippocampus (neural plasticity)
California mouse No effect 92
Performance in dry land maze,
exploratory behaviour in dry land
maze (spatial learning)
California mouse Increase 92
BrdU-labelled cells in amygala,
dentate gyrus and ventromedial
hypothalamus (neurogenesis)
Prairie vole Increase 93
BrdU-labelled cells in main
olfactory bulbs (neurogenesis)
Prairie vole No effect 93
BrdU-labelled cells in
subventricular zone and dentate
gyrus (neurogenesis)
House mouse
(uniparental)
Increase 95
a

Bromodeoxyuridine

More recently, two studies have examined possible effects of fatherhood on neural plasticity and cognition in the biparental California mouse, with contrasting results. Glasper and colleagues (91) injected the cell-division marker bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) into adult males one week following the birth of the males’ offspring, and euthanised the fathers three weeks later. Compared to control males, fathers had fewer BrdU-labelled cells and, specifically, fewer BrdU-labelled neurones, in the dentate gyrus, suggesting that fatherhood inhibits hippocampal neurogenesis; no differences were seen in the subventricular zone. The functional significance of this difference, if any, is not clear: no significant correlations were found between number of BrdU-labelled cells and measures of paternal behaviour, and performance in two hippocampus-dependent cognitive tests, the object-recognition test and the novelty-suppressed feeding test, did not differ between fathers and controls.

Franssen et al. (92) similarly investigated effects of fatherhood on hippocampal plasticity and function in California mice, comparing neural and cognitive measures among fathers, pup-naïve virgin males, and virgin males that had been exposed to a pup for 10 minutes on each of seven consecutive days. Fathers performed significantly better in a dry land maze than both pup-exposed and pup-naive virgins, whereas pup-exposed virgins performed significantly better than pup-naïve virgins. Fathers also showed increased exploratory behaviour in the maze and, subsequently, had enhanced Fos-immunoreactivity in the CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, compared to one or both control groups. No differences were found between fathers and non-fathers, however, in markers of neural plasticity, including hippocampal expression of nestin (a marker of restructuring in mature neurones), Ki-67 (a marker of cell proliferation), doublecortin (an index of the number of new neurones), or glial fibrillary acidic protein (a marker of glial responsiveness).

As in the California mouse, fatherhood has been found to modulate neural plasticity in the prairie vole. Lieberwirth et al. (93) injected male voles with BrdU daily for 14 days before assigning them to mixed-sex pairs, same-sex pairs, or individual housing. Voles were euthanised the day after the birth of the breeding males’ second litters, and brains were analysed for BrdU labelling to characterise survival of new cells. Compared to one or both control groups, fathers had significantly fewer BrdU-labelled cells in the central, cortical, and medial amygdala, but not the basolateral amygdala. Fathers also had significantly fewer BrdU-labelled cells in the dentate gyrus as well as the ventromedial hypothalamus. No differences were found in the main olfactory bulbs. These results suggest that fatherhood reduces the survival of new cells in the amygdala, dentate gyrus, and hypothalamus of male prairie voles. These results could not be attributed simply to fathers’ interactions with pups: in male prairie voles pair-housed with oestrogen-treated, ovariectomised females, neither acute (20 minutes on one day) nor chronic (20 minutes on each of 10 consecutive days) exposure to a pup altered survival of new cells in these brain regions (93) (see also (94)).

Finally, an elegant series of studies in the uniparental house mouse (Mus) indicates that interactions of an adult male mouse with its own pups stimulate neurogenesis in the father’s subventricular zone and dentate gyrus under the influence of prolactin signalling (95). Some of the new cells mature into olfactory interneurones in the olfactory bulb, where they respond preferentially to offspring odors and appear to subserve recognition of mature offspring.

In sum, these findings indicate that several aspects of plasticity, including proliferation and survival of neurones, as well as neuronal morphology, can be altered by parental experience in male mammals. To date, the only documented functional consequence of this fatherhood-induced plasticity is olfactory recognition of offspring in male house mice (95). Clearly, additional work is needed to more fully characterise the effects of fatherhood on the paternal brain; the sensory, behavioural, and endocrine mechanisms mediating these effects; and the functional significance of fatherhood-induced neural plasticity for fathers’ physiology and behaviour.

Effects of fatherhood on stress responsiveness and emotionality

In at least several mammalian species, mothers exhibit blunted hormonal, neural, and behavioural responses to stressors during late pregnancy and lactation (reviewed by (14, 96, 97)). Late-pregnant and lactating rats, for example, have reduced corticosterone and/or adrenocorticotrophic hormone responses to numerous psychological and physiological stressors, compared to virgin females. Pregnant and lactating rats also show attenuated stress-induced increases in corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) mRNA, vasopressin mRNA, and c-fos mRNA expression in the PVN. The mechanisms underlying these reductions in hormonal and neural responsiveness during pregnancy and lactation are not fully understood; however, increased activity of the brain’s prolactin and, to a lesser extent, oxytocin systems and decreased noradrenergic stimulation of the PVN have been implicated (14, 97).

Pregnant and lactating rats, mice, and, arguably, women also exhibit reduced anxiety and fearfulness (97, 98). Compared to nulliparous females, for example, postpartum rats and/or mice show reduced acoustic startle responses, increased locomotion in the open field, increased time in the open arms of the elevated plus maze, increased time in the light compartment of a light/dark chamber, and reduced fleeing from an intruder. The mechanisms of decreased emotionality in mothers are not fully understood but, like reduced stress-responsiveness, are thought to involve intracerebral prolactin and oxytocin, which tend to have anxiolytic effects, as well as intracerebral CRH and vasopressin, which tend to be anxiogenic (9799).

The function of diminished stress responsiveness and emotionality in mothers is not known. Hypotheses include protection of infants from exposure to high glucocorticoid levels through the placenta or breast milk (96, 97), protection of mothers from mood disorders (97, 98), and protection of maternal behaviour and/or lactation from stress-induced inhibition (14, 96, 99). Because fathers in biparental species, like mothers, presumably undergo selection to provide infant care under stressful circumstances, and because these fathers, like mothers, may undergo changes in prolactin, oxytocin, and vasopressin signalling with the onset of parenthood (4, 100), the question arises as to whether fathers, too, exhibit blunted stress responsiveness and reduced emotionality, compared to their non-breeding counterparts. This question has been addressed in recent studies using the California mouse and prairie vole (Table 3).

Table 3.

Effects of fatherhood on responses to stressors and anxiety-like behavior in males of biparental mammalian species.

Stressor/Test
(interpretation)
Dependent
Variable
Species Effect of Fatherhood Reference
Handling + 5-minute
exposure to predator urine
(acute stress response)
Plasma
corticosterone
California
mouse
No effect 39, 40
Handling + 5-minute
exposure to predator urine
(acute stress response)
Fos in PVNa
CeAb, BNSTc
California
mouse
No effect 101
Handling + 5-minute
exposure to predator urine
(acute stress response)
Behavior California
mouse
Decrease 39
Novel-object test
(neophobia)
Behavior California
mouse
No effect 101
Novel-object open-field test
(anxiety-like behavior)
Disruptions in
patterning of
behavior
California
mouse
Decrease 102
3-minute exposure to TMTd
(acute stress response)
Behavior California
mouse
No effect 102
Chronic variable stress
paradigm (chronic stress
response)
Plasma
corticosterone
California
mouse
No effect 46, 69
Chronic variable stress
paradigm (chronic stress
response)
CRHe mRNA
and AVPf
mRNA in PVN
California
mouse
No effect 46
Elevated plus maze
(anxiety-like behavior)
Behavior Prairie vole Decreased ratio of time in
open arms to total time in
arms; no other significant
differences
93
Open-field test (anxiety-like
behavior)
Behavior Prairie vole Increased time in corners
of open field; no other
significant differences
93
Forced-swim test
(depression-like behavior)
Behavior Prairie vole Increased latency to
immobility, number of
immobility bouts, and
duration of immobility (in
fathers and mated males)
93
a

Paraventricular nucleus of hypothalamus

b

Central nucleus of amygdala

c

Bed nucleus of stria terminalis

d

2,5-dihydro-2,4,5-trimethylthiazoline (component of fox feces)

e

Corticotropin-releasing hormone

f

Vasopressin

An acute stressor, handling plus 5-minute exposure to predator urine, elicited a marked elevation in plasma corticosterone concentrations in male California mice; however, the magnitude of this elevation did not differ between new fathers (housed with their pairmate and first litter of pups) and either virgin males (housed in with another male) or pair-housed, nonbreeding males (intact males housed with a tubally ligated female, (40); or vasectomised males housed with an intact female (39). These results were obtained whether the males were tested individually or with their cagemate(s) present. In a separate study, Fos expression in three brain regions associated with stress – the PVN, central nucleus of the amygdala, and BNST – did not differ between new fathers and either expectant fathers or virgin males, either under baseline conditions or after exposure to predator urine (101).

Fatherhood also does not appear to alter hormonal or neural responses to chronic stress in California mice. A 7-day chronic variable stress paradigm elicited a transient elevation in plasma corticosterone concentrations and an increase in vasopressin mRNA (but not CRH mRNA) expression in the PVN; however, these effects did not differ between new fathers, nonbreeding males pair-housed with a tubally ligated female, and virgin males pair-housed with another male (46).

On the other hand, two studies have found that California mouse fathers show attenuated behavioural responses to acute stressors, compared to non-fathers. Bardi et al. (102) found no differences in behavioural responses to 3-minute exposure to 2,5-dihydro-2,4,5-trimethylthiazoline (TMT, a component of fox feces) among experienced fathers, virgin males with no previous exposure to pups, and virgin males that had been exposed to pups on three previous days. When tested in an open field containing a novel object, however, the three groups showed several significant differences in the patterning of behaviour, with fathers showing the lowest and pup-naïve virgins showing the highest numbers of interrupted grooming bouts, behavioural transitions, and changes in direction of locomotion (102). In contrast, Chauke et al. (101) found no differences among fathers, expectant fathers, paired virgins, and isolated virgins in behavioural responses in a novel-object test. Chauke et al. (101) did find, however, that in males tested with their familiar cagemates, 5-minute exposure to predator urine elicited acute changes in several behaviours in virgin males and nonbreeding males, but not in fathers. In the California mouse, therefore, mixed evidence suggests that fathers may show blunted behavioural responses to acute stressors, and this effect does not seem to depend upon the immediate presence of the fathers’ mate and pups; however, no evidence to date indicates that California mouse fathers have attenuated hormonal or neural responses to acute or chronic stressors.

In contrast to California mice, prairie vole fathers may show increased anxiety-like behaviour, according to a recent study. Compared to virgin males housed in same-sex pairs and mated males housed with an ovariectomised, oestrogen-primed female, fathers spent significantly more time in the corners of an open field, and a significantly lower proportion of time in the open arms of the elevated plus maze (93). These differences were subtle, however, and most behavioural measures in both tests did not differ among groups, calling into question the biological significance of the effects. Prairie vole fathers also showed increased depression-like behaviour in the forced-swim test (i.e., shorter latency to immobility, more bouts of immobility, increased duration of immobility) compared to virgin males; however, these measures did not differ between fathers and non-breeding mated males, suggesting that depression-like behaviour was increased by pair-bonding or cohabitation with a female, rather than by fatherhood per se, (93).

Taken together, these results from California mice and prairie voles suggest that parenthood may not have pronounced effects on stress responsiveness or emotionality in fathers, in contrast to the well documented effects of pregnancy and lactation in mothers. Given that gestational and lactational hyporesponsiveness to stress have not been documented in female California mice (39) or prairie voles, this apparent difference between mothers and fathers might instead reflect differences among species. On the other hand, if gestational and lactational hyporesponsiveness to stress evolved as a mechanism to protect fetuses and pups from exposure to high levels of glucocorticoids via the placenta and mother’s milk, then the lack of similar hyporesponsiveness in males would make sense, from a functional perspective. Studies of additional biparental species, including intraspecific comparisons of mothers and fathers, would be informative.

Conclusions

Behavioural endocrinologists have recognised for three decades that mammalian fathers can undergo systematic endocrine changes in association with infant care (29). These changes commonly appear to include shifts in circulating prolactin and testosterone levels, and may additionally include changes in peripheral oestrogen, progesterone, and glucocorticoid concentrations, as well as in the intracerebral vasopressin and oxytocin systems. In recent years, however, it has become increasingly clear that the hormonal and neuropeptide profiles of fatherhood may be quite variable among species and might not play important, direct, causal roles in the expression of paternal behaviour (4, 20). Several investigators have therefore suggested that the hormonal and neurochemical sequelae of fatherhood in biparental mammals may indirectly facilitate paternal care and/or paternal survival through diverse actions on fathers’ behaviour and physiology (e.g., (9, 103)); however, the study of such effects is still in its infancy.

The endocrine consequences of fatherhood, as well as their physiological and behavioural sequelae, are likely to differ within and among species, in association with the specific demands on fathers. These, in turn, may depend on such factors as ecological and demographic parameters – e.g., abundance and distribution of food, intensity of predation pressure, and availability of alloparents – as well as the quality, quantity, and energetic costs of infant care provided by fathers.

Several important caveats should be kept in mind when considering hormonal and neurochemical changes in mammalian fathers and their potential significance. First, our understanding of such effects comes almost entirely from only a small number of species, primarily several muroid rodents and callitrichid primates (i.e., marmosets and tamarins). Clearly, data are needed from a broader range of taxa, including the heavily biparental canids (15).

Second, hormonal correlates of fatherhood, as well as their possible physiological and behavioural consequences, have been studied almost exclusively in captive animals, which face few energetic demands such as finding food, thermoregulating, detecting or escaping from predators, defending a territory, or competing for mates. Studies of biparental mammals in natural or semi-natural environments would provide valuable insights into the physiological and behavioural impacts of parenthood on mammalian fathers.

In spite of these limitations, as reviewed above, recent evidence suggests that fathers in biparental mammalian species undergo systematic changes in body weight, body composition, and neurogenesis, all of which are likely to be mediated by hormonal profiles of fatherhood. The mechanisms, functional significance, and frequency in nature of these effects remain to be determined. Moreover, endocrine changes in biparental mammalian fathers are likely to effect additional physiological and behavioural alterations in such functions as thermoregulatory ability, osmoregulation (103), immune function (46), exercise physiology and performance ability. Characterizing such impacts of fatherhood on male mammals in biparental species would significantly enhance our understanding of male reproductive strategies as well as mammalian life histories, and poses an exciting challenge for behavioural endocrinology.

Acknowledgments

We thank the organisers of the fifth Parental Brain Conference for inviting us to participate in the symposium on Paternal Behaviour and Physiology and to contribute a paper to this special issue of the Journal of Neuroendocrinology. We also thank the many collaborators and students who contributed to our own research on the biology of mammalian fatherhood, especially C.T. Snowdon, S.R. Zahed, M.L. Sosa, K. Washabaugh, L.J. Peterson, M. Buntin, F.H. Wegner, D.J. Wittwer, T.R. de Jong, B.N. Harris, M. Chauke, J.P. Perea-Rodriguez, J.R. Andrew, T. Garland, Jr. and M.A. Chappell. B.N. Harris, T.R. de Jong, J.R. Andrew, and N.D. Horrell, as well as two anonymous reviewers, provided helpful comments on the manuscript. W.S.’s research on fatherhood in California mice has been funded by NIH grants R21MH087806 and R21HD075021 and by NSF grant IOS-1256572. T.E.Z.’s research on fatherhood in marmosets and tamarins has been funded by NIH grants HD057684, MH070423, MH56413, MH35215 and the NIH NCRR, ORIP base grant RR000167 to the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center.

References

  • 1.Freeman ME, Kanyicska B, Lerant A, Nagy G. Prolactin: Structure, function, and regulation of secretion. Physiol Rev. 2000;80:1523–1631. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Neumann ID. Brain oxytocin: A key regulator of emotional and social behaviours in both females and males. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20:858–865. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Spencer TE, Bazer FW. Conceptus signals for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004;2:49. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-2-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Numan M, Insel TR. The Neurobiology of Parental Behavior. New York: Springer; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ladyman SR, Augustine RA, Grattan DR. Hormone interactions regulating energy balance during pregnancy. J Neuroendocrinol. 2010;22:5–817. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.02017.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Woodside B, Budin R, Wellman MK, Abizaid A. Many mouths to feed: the control of food intake during lactation. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2012;33:301–314. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bouman A, Heineman MJ, Faas MM. Sex hormones and the immune response in humans. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:411–423. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kinsley CH, Lambert KG. Reproduction-induced neuroplasticity: natural behavioural and neuronal alterations associated with the production and care of offspring. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20:515–525. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01667.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leuner B, Glasper ER, Gould E. Parenting and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:465–473. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lévy F, Gheusi G, Keller M. Plasticity of the parental brain: A case for neurogenesis. J Neuroendocrinol. 2011;23:984–993. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Macbeth AH, Luine VN. Changes in anxiety and cognition due to reproductive experience: A review of data from rodent and human mothers. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;34:452–467. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pawluski JL, Brummelte S, Barha CK, Crozier TM, Galea LAM. Effects of steroid hormones on neurogenesis in the hippocampus of the adult female rodent during the estrous cycle, pregnancy, lactation and aging. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009;30:343–357. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miranda JA, Liu RC. Dissecting natural sensory plasticity: Hormones and experience in a maternal context. Hear Res. 2009;252:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brunton PJ, Russell JA, Douglas AJ. Adaptive responses of the maternal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis during pregnancy and lactation. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20:764–776. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01735.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kleiman DG, Malcolm JR. The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In: Gubernick DJ, Klopfer PH, editors. Parental Care in Mammals. New York: Plenum; 1981. pp. 347–387. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Woodroffe R, Vincent A. Mother’s little helpers: Patterns of male care in mammals. Trends Ecol Evol. 1994;8:294–297. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fernandez-Duque E, Valeggia CR, Mendoza SP. The biology of paternal care in human and nonhuman primates. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2009;38:115–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kentner AC, Abizaid A, Bielajew C. Modeling Dad: Animal models of paternal behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;34:438–451. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Campbell JC, Laugero KD, Van Westerhuyzen JA, Hostetler CM, Cohen JD, Bales KL. Costs of pair-bonding and paternal care in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) Physiol Behav. 2009;98:367–373. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wynne-Edwards KE, Timonin ME. Paternal care in rodents: weakening support of hormonal regulation of the transition to behavioral fatherhood in rodent animal models of biparental care. Horm Behav. 2007;52:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nunes S, Fite JE, Patera KJ, French JA. Interactions among paternal behavior, steroid hormones, and parental experience in male marmosets (Callithrix kuhlii) Horm Behav. 2001;39:70–82. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2000.1631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ziegler TE, Snowdon CT. Preparental hormone levels and parenting experience in male cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus. Horm Behav. 2000;38:159–167. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2000.1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brown RE, Murdoch T, Murphy PR, Moger WH. Hormonal responses of male gerbils to stimuli from their mate and pups. Horm Behav. 1995;29:474–491. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1995.1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gubernick DJ, Nelson RJ. Prolactin and paternal behavior in the biparental California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Horm Behav. 1989;23:203–210. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(89)90061-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reburn CJ, Wynne-Edwards KE. Hormonal changes in males of a naturally biparental and a uniparental mammal. Horm Behav. 1999;35:163–176. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1998.1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ma E, Lau J, Grattan DR, Lovejoy DA, Wynne-Edwards KE. Male and female prolactin receptor mRNA expression in the brain of a biparental and a uniparental hamster, Phodopus, before and after the birth of a litter. J Neuroendocrinol. 2005;17:81–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2005.01278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ziegler TE, Wegner FH, Snowdon CT. Hormonal responses to parental and nonparental conditions in male cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus, a New World primate. Horm Behav. 1996;30:287–297. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1996.0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ziegler TE, Prudom SL, Zahed SR, Parlow AF, Wegner F. Prolactin’s mediative role in male parenting in parentally experienced marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) Horm Behav. 2009;56:436–443. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dixson AF, George L. Prolactin and parental behaviour in a male New World primate. Nature. 1982;299:551–553. doi: 10.1038/299551a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gettler LT, McDade TW, Feranil AB, Kuzawa CW. Prolactin, fatherhood, and reproductive behavior in human males. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012;148:362–370. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ziegler TE, Washabaugh KF, Snowdon CT. Responsiveness of expectant male cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus, to mate’s pregnancy. Horm Behav. 2004;45:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2003.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gettler LT, McDade TW, Feranil AB, Kuzawa CW. Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in human males. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:16194–16199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105403108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Trainor BC, Bird IM, Alday NA, Schlinger BA, Marler CA. Variation in aromatase activity in the medial preoptic area and plasma progesterone is associated with the onset of paternal behavior. Neuroendocrinology. 2003;78:36–44. doi: 10.1159/000071704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schum JE, Wynne-Edwards KE. Estradiol and progesterone in paternal and non-paternal hamsters (Phodopus) becoming fathers: conflict with hypothesized roles. Horm Behav. 2005;47:410–418. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Timonin ME, Cushing BS, Wynne-Edwards KE. In three brain regions central to maternal behaviour, neither male nor female Phodopus dwarf hamsters show changes in oestrogen receptor alpha distribution with mating or parenthood. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20:1301–1309. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01797.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Song Z, Tai F, Yu C, Wu R, Zhang X, Broders H, He F, Guo R. Sexual or paternal experiences alter alloparental behavior and the central expression of ER and OT in male mandarin voles (Microtus mandarinus) Behav Brain Res. 2010;214:290–300. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nunes S, Fite JE, French JA. Variations in steroid hormones associated with infant care behaviour and experience in male marmosets (Callithrix kuhlii) Anim Behav. 2000;60:857–865. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Berg SJ, Wynne-Edwards KE. Salivary hormone concentrations in mothers and fathers becoming parents are not correlated. Horm Behav. 2002;42:424–436. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chauke M, Malisch JL, Robinson C, de Jong TR, Saltzman W. Effects of reproductive status on behavioral and endocrine responses to acute stress in a biparental rodent, the California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) Horm Behav. 2011;60:128–138. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Harris BN, Saltzman W. Effect of reproductive status on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) activity and reactivity in male California mice (Peromyscus californicus) Physiol Behav. 2013;112–113:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fleming AS, Corter C, Stallings J, Steiner M. Testosterone and prolactin are associated with emotional responses to infant cries in new fathers. Horm Behav. 2002;42:399–413. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gray PB, Parking JC, Samms-Vaughan ME. Hormonal correlates of human paternal interactions: A hospital-based investigation in urban Jamaica. Horm Behav. 2007;52:499–507. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bamshad M, Novak MA, De Vries GJ. Sex and species differences in the vasopressin innervation of sexually naïve and parental prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster and meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. J Neuroendocrinol. 1993;5:247–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1993.tb00480.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bamshad M, Novak MA, De Vries GJ. Cohabitation alters vasopressin innervation and paternal behavior in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) Physiol Behav. 1994;56:751–758. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90238-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang ZX, Liu Y, Young LJ, Insel TR. Hypothalamic vasopressin gene expression increases in both males and females postpartum in a biparental rodent. J Neuroendocrinol. 2000;12:111–120. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2000.00435.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.De Jong TR, Harris BN, Perea-Rodriguez JP, Saltzman W. Physiological and neuroendocrine responses to chronic variable stress in male California mice (Peromyscus californicus): influence of social environment and paternal state. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38:2023–2033. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kozorovitskiy Y, Hughes M, Lee K, Gould E. Fatherhood affects dendritic spines and vasopressin V1a receptors in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nature Neurosci. 2006;9:1094–1095. doi: 10.1038/nn1753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Parker KJ, Kinney LF, Phillips KM, Lee TM. Paternal behavior is associated with central neurohormone receptor binding patterns in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) Behav Neurosci. 2001;115:1341–1348. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.115.6.1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gubernick DJ, Winslow JT, Jensen P, Jeanotte L, Bowen J. Oxytocin changes in males over the reproductive cycle in the monogamous, biparental California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Horm Behav. 1995;29:59–73. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1995.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Churchland PS, Winkielman P. Modulating social behavior with oxytocin: How does it work? What does it mean? Horm Behav. 2012;61:392–399. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Brown RE. Hormonal and experiential factors influencing parental behaviour in male rodents: an integrative approach. Behav Proc. 1993;30:1–28. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(93)90009-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Roberts RL, Jenkins KT, Lawler T, Jr, Wegner FH, Newman JD. Bromocriptine administration lowers serum prolactin and disrupts parental responsiveness in common marmosets (Callithrix j. jacchus) Horm Behav. 2001;39:106–112. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2000.1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Almond REA, Brown GR, Keverne EB. Suppression of prolactin does not reduce infant care by parentally experienced male common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) Horm Behav. 2006;49:673–680. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sakaguchi K, Tanaka M, Ohkubo T, Doh-ura K, Fujikawa T, Sudo S, Nakashima K. Induction of brain prolactin receptor long-form mRNA expression and maternal behavior in pup-contacted male rats: promotion by prolactin administration and suppression by female contact. Neuroendocrinology. 1996;63:559–568. doi: 10.1159/000127085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Brooks PL, Vella ET, Wynne-Edwards KE. Dopamine agonist treatment before and after the birth reduces prolactin concentration but does not impair paternal responsiveness in Djungarian hamsters, Phodopus campbelli. Horm Behav. 2005;47:358–366. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Schradin C, Anzenberger G. Prolactin, the hormone of paternity. News Physiol Sci. 1999;14:223–231. doi: 10.1152/physiologyonline.1999.14.6.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hume JM, Wynne-Edwards KE. Castration reduces male testosterone, estradiol, and territorial aggression, but not paternal behavior in biparental dwarf hamsters (Phodopus campbelli) Horm Behav. 2005;48:303–310. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lonstein JS, De Vries GJ. Sex differences in the parental behaviour of adult virgin prairie voles: independence from gonadal hormones and vasopressin. J Neuroendocrinol. 1999;11:441–449. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.1999.00361.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Clark MM, Galef BG., Jr A testosterone-mediated trade-off between parental and sexual effort in male Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) J Comp Psychol. 1999;113:388–395. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.113.4.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wang Z, De Vries GJ. Testosterone effects on paternal behavior and vasopressin immunoreactive projections in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) Brain Res. 1993;631:156–160. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91203-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Trainor BC, Marler CA. Testosterone, paternal behavior, and aggression in the monogamous California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) Horm Behav. 2001;40:32–42. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Trainor BC, Marler CA. Testosterone promotes paternal behaviour in a monogamous via conversion to oestrogen. Proc Biol Sci. 2002;269:823–829. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kirkpatrick B, Kim JW, Insel TR. Limbic system fos expression associated with paternal behavior. Brain Res. 1994;658:112–118. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(09)90016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lee AW, Brown RE. Medial preoptic lesions disrupt parental behavior in both male and female California mice (Peromyscus californicus) Behav Neurosci. 2002;116:968–975. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.116.6.968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schneider JS, Stone MK, Wynne-Edwards KE, Horton TH, Lydon J, O’Malley B, Levine JE. Progesterone receptors mediate male aggression toward infants. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2951–2956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0130100100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Schneider JS, Burgess C, Horton TH, Levine JE. Effects of progesterone on male-mediated infant-directed aggression. Behav Brain Res. 2009;199:340–344. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Harris BN, Perea-Rodriguez JP, Saltzman W. Acute effects of corticosterone injection on paternal behavior in California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) fathers. Horm Behav. 2011;60:666–675. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Santema P, Teitel Z, Manser M, Bennett N, Clutton-Brock T. Effects of cortisol administration on cooperative behavior in meerkat helpers. Behav Ecol. 2013;24:1122–1127. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Harris BN, de Jong TR, Yang V, Saltzman W. Chronic variable stress in fathers alters paternal and social behavior but not pup development in the biparental California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) Horm Behav. 2013;64:799–811. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bester-Meredith JK, Young LJ, Marler CA. Species differences in paternal behavior and aggression in Peromyscus and their associations with vasopressin immunoreactivity and receptors. Horm Behav. 1999;36:25–38. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1999.1522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Insel TR, Gelhard R, Shapiro LE. The comparative distribution of forebrain receptors for neurohypophyseal peptides in mongamous and polygamous mice. Neuroscience. 1991;43:623–630. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90321-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wang Z, Ferris CF, De Vries GJ. Role of septal vasopressin innervation in paternal behavior in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:400–404. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Parker KJ, Lee TM. Central vasopressin administration regulates the onset of facultative paternal behavior in Microtus pennsylvanicus (meadow voles) Horm Behav. 2001;39:285–294. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Naber F, van Ijzendoorn MH, Deschamps P, van Engeland H, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Intranasal oxytocin increases fathers’ observed responsiveness during play with their children: A double-blind within-subject experiment. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010;35:1583–1586. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Weisman O, Delaherche E, Rondeau M, Chetouani M, Cohen D, Feldman R. Oxytocin shapes parental motion during father-infant interaction. Biol Lett. 2013;9:20130828. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Weisman O, Zagoory-Sharon O, Feldman R. Oxytocin administration, salivary testosterone, and father-infant social behavior. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014;49:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bales KL, Kim AJ, Lewis-Reese AD, Carter CS. Both oxytocin and vasopressin may influence alloparental behavior in male prairie voles. Horm Behav. 2004;45:354–361. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Madden JR, Clutton-Brock TH. Experimental peripheral administration of oxytocin elevates a suite of cooperative behaviours in a wild social mammal. Proc R Soc B. 2011;278:1189–1194. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Boland MP, Lonergan P, O’Callaghan D. Effect of nutrition on endocrine parameters, ovarian physiology, and oocyte and embryo development. Theriogenology. 2001;55:1323–1340. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00485-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Speakman JR. The physiological costs of reproduction in small mammals. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2008;363:375–398. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tardif SD, Ziegler TE, Power M, Layne DG. Endocrine changes in full-term pregnancies and pregnancy loss due to energy restriction in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:335–339. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Augustine RA, Ladyman SR, Grattan DR. From feeding one to feeding many: hormone-induced changes in bodyweight homeostasis during pregnancy. J Physiol. 2008;586:387–397. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.146316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wade GN, Gray JM. Gonadal effects on food intake and adiposity: A metabolic hypothesis. Physiol Behav. 1979;22:583–593. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(79)90028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Asarian L, Geary N. Cyclic estradiol treatment normalizes body weight and restores physiological patterns of spontaneous feeding and sexual receptivity in ovariectomized rats. Horm Behav. 2002;42:461–471. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Grueso E, Rocha M, Puerta M. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid leptin levels are maintained despite enhanced food intake in progesterone-treated rats. Eur J Endocrinol. 2001;144:659–665. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1440659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Abizaid A, Schiavo L, Diano S. Hypothalamic and pituitary expression of ghrelin receptor message is increased during lactation. Neurosci Lett. 2008;440:206–210. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kunz TH, Hosken DJ. Male lactation: why, why not and is it care? Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;24:80–85. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ziegler TE, Prudom SL, Schultz-Darken NJ, Kurian AV, Snowdon CT. Pregnancy weight gain: marmoset and tamarin dads show it too. Biol Lett. 2006;2:181–183. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sánchez Rodríguez SM, Peláez del Hierro F, Fidalgo de las Heras, Morcilla Pimento AM, Caperos Montalbán JM. Body weight increase in expectant males and helpers of cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus): A symptom of the couvade syndrome? Psicotherma. 2008;20:825–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Achenbach GG, Snowdon CT2002. Costs of caregiving: weight loss in captive adult male cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) following the birth of infants. Internat J Primatol. 2002;23:179–189. doi: 10.1023/A:1013210226793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Glasper ER, Kozorovitskiy Y, Pavlic A, Gould E. Paternal experience suppresses adult neurogenesis without altering hippocampal function in Peromyscus californicus. J Comp Neurol. 2011;519:2271–2281. doi: 10.1002/cne.22628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Franssen CL, Bardi M, Shea EA, Hampton JE, Franssen RA, Kinsley CH, Lambert KG. Fatherhood alters behavioural and neural responsiveness in a spatial task. J Neuroendocrinol. 2011;23:1177–1187. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02225.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lieberwirth C, Wang Y, Jia X, Liu Y, Wang Z. Fatherhood reduces the survival of adult-generated cells and affects various types of behavior in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) Behav Neurosci. 2013;38:3345–3355. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ruscio MG, Sweeny TD, Hazelton JL, Suppatkul P, Boothe E, Carter CS. Pup exposure elicits hippocampal cell proliferation in the prairie vole. Behav Brain Res. 2008;187:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Mak GK, Weiss S. Paternal recognition of adult offspring mediated by newly generated CNS neurons. Nature Neurosci. 2010;13:753–758. doi: 10.1038/nn.2550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lightman SL, Windle RJ, Wood SA, Kershaw YM, Shanks N, Ingram CD. Peripartum plasticity within the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Prog Brain Res. 2001;133:111–129. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(01)33009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Slattery DA, Neumann ID. No stress please! Mechanisms of stress hyporesponsiveness of the maternal brain. J Physiol. 2008;586:377–385. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.145896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Lonstein JS. Regulation of anxiety during the postpartum period. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2007;28:115–141. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Carter CS, Altemus M, Chrousos GP. Neuroendocrine and emotional changes in the post-partum period. Prog Brain Res. 2001;133:241–249. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(01)33018-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Woller MJ, Sosa ME, Chiang Y, Prudom SL, Keelty P, Moore JE, Ziegler TE. Differential hypothalamic secretion of neurocrines in male common marmosets: parental experience effects? J Neuroendocrinol. 2011;24:413–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02252.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Chauke M, de Jong TR, Garland T, Jr, Saltzman W. Paternal responsiveness is associated with, but not mediated by reduced neophobia in male California mice (Peromyscus californicus) Physiol Behav. 2012;107:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bardi M, Franssen CL, Hampton JE, Shea EA, Fanean AP, Lambert KG. Paternal experience and stress responses in California mice (Peromyscus californicus) Comp Med. 2011;61:20–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Schradin C. Comments to K.E. Wynne-Edwards and M.E. Timonin, 2007. Paternal care in rodents: weakening support of hormonal regulation of the transition to behavioral fatherhood in rodent animal models of biparental care. Horm Behav 52: 114-121. Horm Behav. 2007;52:557–559. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES