Skip to main content
Molecular Neuropsychiatry logoLink to Molecular Neuropsychiatry
. 2015 Jun 24;1(2):105–115. doi: 10.1159/000430463

Polymorphism within a Neuronal Activity-Dependent Enhancer of NgR1 Is Associated with Corpus Callosum Morphology in Humans

Masanori Isobe a, Kenji Tanigaki c,*, Kazue Muraki c, Jun Miyata a, Ariyoshi Takemura a, Genichi Sugihara a, Hidehiko Takahashi a, Toshihiko Aso b, Hidenao Fukuyama b, Masaaki Hazama a, Toshiya Murai a,*
PMCID: PMC4996019  PMID: 27602360

Abstract

The human Nogo-66 receptor 1 (NgR1) gene, also termed Nogo receptor 1 or reticulon 4 receptor (RTN4R) and located within 22q11.2, inhibits axonal growth and synaptic plasticity. Patients with the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome show multiple changes in brain morphology, with corpus callosum (CC) abnormalities being among the most prominent and frequently reported. Thus, we hypothesized that, in humans, NgR1 may be involved in CC formation. We focused on rs701428, a single nucleotide polymorphism of NgR1, which is associated with schizophrenia. We investigated the effects of the rs701428 genotype on CC structure in 50 healthy participants using magnetic resonance imaging. Polymorphism of rs701428 was associated with CC structural variation in healthy participants; specifically, minor A allele carriers had larger whole CC volumes and lower radial diffusivity in the central CC region compared with major G allele homozygous participants. Furthermore, we showed that the NgR1 3′ region, which contains rs701428, is a neuronal activity-dependent enhancer, and that the minor A allele of rs701428 is susceptible to regulation of enhancer activity by MYBL2. Our results suggest that NgR1 can influence the macro- and microstructure of the white matter of the human brain.

Key Words: Nogo-66 receptor 1, Corpus callosum, Magnetic resonance imaging, Diffusion tensor imaging, Genetic polymorphism, Bioinformatics, Epigenomics, Luciferase assay, Electrophoretic mobility shift assay

Introduction

In humans, the Nogo-66 receptor 1 (NgR1) gene, also termed Nogo receptor 1 or reticulon 4 receptor (RTN4R), is located within the 22q11.2 locus. NgR1 can bind (1) Nogo-A, (2) myelin-associated glycoprotein, and (3) oligodendrocyte myelin glycoprotein. These proteins are myelin-associated inhibitors of axonal regeneration [1,2,3,4]. Previous research has shown that NgR1 plays a role in the inhibition of axonal growth and synaptic plasticity [5,6]. NgR1 is widely expressed in the central nervous system [7], including in neurons of the neocortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal thalamus [8].

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is caused by a genomic microdeletion within chromosomal region 22q11.2, which contains as many as 35-60 genes [9]. Patients with this syndrome develop schizophrenia at a substantially increased rate of 25-30%, which is approximately 25-31 times higher than in the general population [10]. Thus, this deletion has drawn attention as a potential model for determining the key pathophysiology of schizophrenia [11,12].

The deletion is associated with various types of structural brain alterations in the cavum septum pellucidum and cavum vergae [13,14], polymicrogyria [15], enlarged ventricles [13,16], a decreased volume of the total brain [14,16], cerebellum [13], and hippocampus [17], volume changes of specific subcortical structures including the corpus callosum (CC) [18,19,20], reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) in areas of the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes [21,22], and increased FA from the posterior CC to the occipital lobes [22]. Of these alterations, abnormalities of the CC [18,19,20], the largest interhemispheric tract connecting the association cortices, are among the most prominent and consistently reported in 22q11.2DS. Some of these structural anomalies, including an enlarged CC, are also observed in sporadic schizophrenia [20,23,24,25].

Here, we focused on rs701428, an NgR1 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) that shows an association with schizophrenia in Caucasian and African-American populations [26,27]. An association between allelic variations of this SNP and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics of the white matter tract has been reported in 22q11.2DS patients [28]. To examine the roles of NgR1 in CC formation, we investigated a possible association between NgR1 genetic variation and CC structure in healthy participants, using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DTI. We also examined the physiological function of rs701428 by combining in silico and in vitro approaches.

Subjects and Methods

Participants

Fifty healthy individuals were recruited from the local community. None had a history of psychiatric disease, as determined by the non-patient edition of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). In addition, none had a history of head trauma, neurological disease, severe medical diseases, or substance abuse. There was no history of psychotic disorders among first-degree relatives. The participants were all physically healthy at the time of scanning. This study was approved by the Committee on Medical Ethics of Kyoto University and was performed according to the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

NgR1 Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood samples of each participant using standard methods, with EDTA anticoagulant. The SNP rs701428 was genotyped using the LightCycler 480 system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and a TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assay (TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assay ID C_2785952_10; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA).

MRI Acquisition

All participants were scanned with a 3-tesla MRI scanner (Trio; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Diffusion-weighted imaging data were acquired using single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequences. Structural MRI data were obtained using three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (3D-MPRAGE) sequences, with a 40 mT/m gradient and a receiver-only 8-channel phased-array head coil. The parameters for diffusion-weighted data were: TE (echo time) 96 ms; TR (repetition time) 10,500 ms; 96 × 96 matrix; FOV (field of view) 192 × 192 mm; 70 contiguous axial slices of 2.0 mm thickness; 81 non-colinear axis motion-probing gradients, and b = 1,500 s/mm2. The b = 0 images were scanned before every 9 diffusion-weighted images, hence 90 volumes in total. The parameters for 3D-MPRAGE imaging data were: TE 4.38 ms; TR 2,000 ms; inversion time 990 ms; 240 × 256 matrix; FOV 225 × 240 mm; resolution 0.9375 × 0.9375 × 1.0 mm, and 208 total axial sections without intersection gaps.

Imaging Data Preprocessing

DTI Data Preprocessing

All DTI data processing was performed using programs in the Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB) Software Library (FSL) version 4.1.6 (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl). Source data were corrected for head motion and eddy currents by registering all data to the first b = 0 image with affine transformation. FA maps and indices of white matter integrity were calculated using the DTIFIT program of FSL. In addition, axial diffusivity (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD), measures of diffusivity parallel and perpendicular to axons, respectively, were calculated. TBSS version 1.2 in FSL was used to normalize all FA data into the MNI 152 space. The FMRIB Nonlinear Image Registration Tool (FNIRT) was used for nonlinear transformation. Normalized FA images were averaged and thinned to create a mean skeletonized FA image, taking only centers of white matter tracts common to all subjects. Voxel values of each subject's normalized FA map were projected onto the FA skeleton by searching for the local maxima along the perpendicular direction from the skeleton. Resultant skeletonized FA data were used in the following statistical analysis. The same transformations were applied to AD and RD images to create skeletonized AD and RD maps.

Structural MRI Data Preprocessing

The 3D-MPRAGE images were preprocessed using the FreeSurfer software package version 5.0.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu). The process included Talairach transformation of each subject's native brain, removal of non-brain tissue, volumetric subcortical labeling, and surface-based segmentation of gray and white matter tissue. In automatic segmentation, each voxel in normalized brain volumes was assigned a label based on an atlas containing probabilistic information about structure locations, including the CC. Subdivided cerebral white matter regions were derived from cortical parcellation.

Region of Interest Setting Using FreeSurfer

To define CC regions of interest (ROI), we used automatic segmentation in FreeSurfer [29] based on subcortical parcellation, which segments the CC into anterior, middle anterior, central, middle posterior, and posterior regions. Volumes of each region were automatically calculated during the segmentation process. The ‘whole CC’ was the sum of the five subregions. Masks derived from these ROI were used to measure DTI indices (FA, AD, and RD) of the whole and segmented CC. To determine DTI indices of the CC in the diffusion space, ROI derived from FreeSurfer template images were transformed from an MNI 302 space to an MNI 152 space by applying the rigid-body transformation matrix, which was calculated using FSL's FLIRT program. To check transformation quality and to confirm there were no gross transformation errors, we overlaid each CC ROI onto the FMRIB58_FA image, a mean FA template in the MNI 152 space (fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Segmented CC. a CC labels derived from a FreeSurfer template image. b Rigid-body-transformed image of a segmented CC ROI from the MNI 302 to the MNI 152 space.

Data Analysis

Group Comparison of Demographic Data

Minor A allele carriers are associated with schizophrenia [26]; therefore, we compared the minor A allele carrier group (A carrier group) with the homozygote wild-type G allele carrier group (G homozygous group). Demographic data and ROI volumes were analyzed by two-sample t tests using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 (two-tailed) in all analyses.

Group Comparison of Volume and DTI Indices of the Whole CC

To investigate differences in whole CC volumes between the G homozygous and the A carrier group, we adjusted the volume by the intracranial volume of each patient [30]. The white matter volume of the whole brain was also measured. In addition, we calculated the mean FA, AD, and RD in the whole CC mask by multiplying the CC mask and skeletonized maps. We determined significant differences using unpaired two-sample t tests, with the statistical threshold defined as p < 0.05 (two-tailed).

Group Comparison of Volume and Diffusivity in CC ROI

Next, when we detected a group difference in CC total volume, we investigated volume differences in CC ROI between the G homozygous and the A carrier group to determine which CC subregion was most responsible for the volume differences observed. We determined significant differences using unpaired two-sample t tests, with the statistical threshold at p < 0.01 (= 0.05/5). We also calculated the mean FA, AD, and RD of each region using the same method as for whole CC analysis, comparing the two groups using unpaired two-sample t tests. For this analysis, the t tests were performed 15 times (5 ROI × 3 parameters); thus, after Bonferroni correction, the statistical threshold was set at p < 0.0033 (= 0.05/15).

Functional Analysis of the NgR1 3′ Enhancer

Epigenomic Data

ChIP-seq and DNaseI-seq data were obtained from the ENCODE Project (http://genome.ucsc.edu/ENCODE). ENCODE Project data were displayed in the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC) Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu).

Luciferase Assays

DNA fragments corresponding to a candidate enhancer region (chr22:20224442-20228467) and a 5′-deleted region (chr22:20224442-20227395, 20228125-20228467) were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified from human genomic DNA and cloned into the pGL4.50 plasmid (Promega, Madison, Wis., USA) at the BamHI site using the In-Fusion HD cloning kit (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) to generate reference-cytomegalovirus (CMV), rs701428-CMV, and reference-S-CMV plasmids. PCR fragments were Sanger sequenced in both directions to confirm the presence of the rs701428 SNP and the absence of PCR amplification-induced mutations.

Reporter plasmids were cotransfected into mouse cortical neurons with constitutively active pRL-CMV Renilla luciferase (Promega) as the control plasmid, using a NEPA21 electroporator (Nepa Gene, Chiba, Japan). C57BL/6 mouse embryonic-day 16.5 embryo cortices were dissected and dissociated using a neural tissue dissociation kit (P; Miltenyi-Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). To fully dissociate cells, trituration was performed using a flame-narrowed Pasteur pipette. Dissociated mouse cortical neurons were centrifuged at 90 g for 5 min at 4°C and resuspended in a 100-μl mixture of Opti-MEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif., USA) and reporter plasmid. Two types of electric pulse were applied (poring pulse condition: 275 V, pulse length 0.5 ms, 2 pulses, interval between pulses 50 ms, decay 10%, rate with + polarity; transfer pulse condition: 20 V, pulse length 50 ms, 5 pulses, interval between pulses 50 ms, decay 40%, rate with +/- polarity). After electroporation, cells were immediately seeded onto polyornithine-coated 96-well plates (Nunc, Naperville, Ill., USA). The plates were precoated overnight with polyornithine (30 mg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo., USA) in water, and washed 3 times with water before use. Neurons were maintained in Neurobasal Medium containing B27 supplement (2%; Invitrogen), penicillin-streptomycin (100 mg/ml penicillin, 100 U/ml streptomycin; Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), and glutamine (2 mm; Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md., USA) and grown in vitro for 6 days. One half of the medium was replaced with fresh warm medium on the 2nd, 4th, and 6th days in vitro. Neurons 6 days in vitro were incubated for 12 h in 1 μm tetrodotoxin (TTX; Tocris, Bristol, UK) and 100 μmD-(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (D-AP5; Tocris), and then for 6 h in 55 mm KCl. Next, cells were harvested and extracts were assayed for luciferase activity using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega), with measurements performed using a Varioskan (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass., USA). The luminescence ratio of experimental sample to control reporter was calculated for each sample and defined as the relative luciferase unit.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay

DNA binding reactions were performed in 20 μl reaction volumes containing 50 fmol end-labeled dsDNA probe and 2 μg nuclear extract in Gel Shift Assay System buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The reaction mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 30 min, loaded onto 6% native polyacrylamide gels, and run in 0.5× Tris-boric acid-EDTA buffer at 130 V for 4 h. For competition experiments, cold probe (10-fold molar excess of the unlabeled oligonucleotide) was added, with the probe added last.

Nuclear extracts from control and c-MYB, MYBL1, or MYBL2-transfected 293T cells were prepared using the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The upper strand sequences for double-stranded oligonucleotides were: schizophrenia risk rs701428-A allele probe: 5′-CTGAAGGAGAGTTGGGCGGGTCAGG-3′, and reference-G allele probe: 5′-CTGAAGGAGAGTCGGGCGGGTCAGG-3′. The oligonucleotide probes were labeled and subjected to a gel shift assay using the Biotin 3′ End Labeling and Light-Shift Chemiluminescent EMSA Kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific). To anneal complementary oligonucleotides, sense and antisense oligonucleotides were combined and incubated at 95°C for 5 min. Binding reactions containing 10× binding buffer, 1 μg poly(dI-dC), 5 mm MgCl2, 2.5% glycerol, and 6 μg nuclear extract were incubated with biotin-labeled oligonucleotides (20 fmol per oligonucleotide), in the absence or presence of a 200-fold molar excess of unlabeled competitor, for 20 min at room temperature. For competition studies, increasing concentrations of unlabeled oligonucleotides were added to the binding reactions. Samples were then run on a native 5% polyacrylamide gel. The gel contents were transferred to nylon membranes (Hybond-N+; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, N.J., USA) and cross-linked to the membrane using a UV cross-linker. The membranes were blocked and visualized using the Light-Shift kit.

Results

Demographic Data

The characteristics of the participants are shown in table 1. No significant difference between the G homozygous and the A carrier group was found with regard to age, sex, handedness, education, or IQ.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the two groups

Genotype
Statistical value (t or χ2 test) p value
AA/AG GG
Number 36 14 – –
Age, years 25.7 ± 6.6 24.1 ± 5.3 0.84 0.41a
Gender, F/M 16/20 3/11 1.62 0.14b
Education,
 years 14.0 ± 2.9 14.3 ± 2.8 0.28 0.78a
VIQ 110.8 ± 17.0 118.9 ± 18.0 1.48 0.15a
PIQ 115.4 ± 17.1 122.5 ± 13.1 1.39 0.17a

Values denote means ± SD unless specified otherwise. VIQ = Verbal IQ; PIQ = performance IQ.

a

Two-sample t test.

b

χ2 test.

Whole CC Imaging

The A carrier group had significantly larger whole CC volumes than the G homozygous group (fig. 2a), which was also confirmed using a permutation test (empirical p value = 0.026). There were no significant differences in whole CC DTI indices (table 2). We also analyzed the data with age included as a covariate, and the group difference was reproduced.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a Scatter plot of whole CC volume (CC_total) versus genotype. Genotype segregates with CC volume. b Scatter plot of RD in the central region of the CC (RD_cCC) versus genotype.

Table 2.

Group differences in diffusivity parameters (FA, AD, and RD) in whole CC

Genotype
d.f. t value p valuea
AA/AG GG
Volume 2.01 1.80 48 1.96 0.028b
Diffusivity
 FA 0.682 0.667 48 1.30 0.200
 AD 1.25 ×10−3 1.26 × 10−3 48 0.64 0.525
 RD 3.47 ×10−4 3.65 × 10−4 48 1.39 0.172
a

Two-sample t test.

b

p < 0.05.

CC Subregion Imaging

The A carrier group showed a trend towards a larger anterior CC volume compared with the G homozygous group, although the difference was nonsignificant after Bonferroni correction (table 3). With regard to DTI indices, the mean RD in the central CC region was significantly smaller in the A carrier group than in the G homozygous group (fig. 2b; table 4).

Table 3.

Group differences in volumes in separated CC ROI

Region Genotype
d.f. t value p valuea
AA/AG GG
Whole 2.01 1.80 48 1.96 0.028a
Anterior 0.534 0.467 48 2.06 0.022b
Mid-anterior 0.317 0.281 48 1.17 0.124b
Central 0.313 0.279 48 1.07 0.145b
Mid-posterior 0.280 0.262 48 0.42 0.337b
Posterior 0.566 0.513 48 1.58 0.060b
a

Two-sample t test.

b

Two-sample t test, corrected by the Bonferroni method.

Table 4.

Group differences in DTI indices (FA, AD, and RD) in separated CC ROI

Region Diffusivity Genotype
t value p valuea
AA/AG GG
Anterior FA 0.678076 0.6800 0.11 0.913
AD 1.146 × 10−3 1.134 × 10−3 0.35 0.728
RD 3.230 × 10−4 3.148 × 10−4 0.36 0.722

Mid-anterior FA 0.635122 0.608152 1.54 0.130
AD 1.211 × 10−3 1.240 × 10−3 1.09 0.282
RD 3.790 × 10−4 4.152 × 10−4 1.79 0.079

Central FA 0.697747 0.668065 2.30 0.026
AD 1.310 × 10−3 1.337 × 10−3 1.12 0.245
RD 3.389 × 10−4 3.797 × 10−4 3.14 0.003b

Mid-posterior FA 0.614926 0.601437 0.71 0.481
AD 1.435 × 10−3 1.432 × 10−3 0.10 0.919
RD 4.894 × 10−4 4.994 × 10−4 0.37 0.712

Posterior FA 0.745049 0.727123 1.33 0.190
AD 1.270 × 10−3 1.297 × 10−3 1.01 0.317
RD 2.837 × 10−4 3.090 × 10−4 1.63 0.110
a

Two-sample t test, corrected by the Bonferroni method.

b

p < 0.0033 (= 0.05/15).

Functional Analysis of the NgR1 3′ Enhancer

The 3′ Region of NgR1 Harbors Regulatory Elements

Multiple species alignment of the region surrounding the rs701428 SNP was examined in the UCSC Genome Browser Multiz alignment track [31,32.] The NgR1 3′ region is highly conserved and is, therefore, likely to contain enhancer elements (fig. 3). Regulatory elements such as active promoters and enhancers are commonly found in open chromatin regions, which can be identified using genome-wide DNase I hypersensitivity assays (DNaseI-seq; ENCODE Consortium) [33,34,35]. The rs701428 SNP in the NgR1 3′ region was mapped within a DNase I-hypersensitive site in the human prefrontal cortex (fig. 3). To determine if this region harbors enhancers, we examined histone H3 lysine 4 monomethylation (H3K4me1) and lysine 9 acetylation (H3K9ac), markers of enhancers (ENCODE Consortium) [36,37,38] H3K4me1 and H3K9ac enrichment suggests that the NgR1 3′ region is an active regulatory element (fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Epigenetic annotation of the NgR1 gene. UCSC Genome Browser screenshot showing the ∼50-kbp region surrounding the rs701428 SNP in the NgR1 gene 3′ region. The lower panel represents an enlarged view of the rs701428 SNP. H3K4me1 and H3K9ac enrichment from NT2-D1 cells, DNaseI-seq enrichment from the human prefrontal cortex, and multi-percent identity plot alignment of genomic sequences from 8 species are indicated.

The presence of overlapping H3K4me1, H3K9ac, and DNase I hypersensitivity peaks suggests the presence of an enhancer in the NgR1 3′ region. To investigate if this region has potential enhancer activity, chr22:20224442-20228467 was PCR amplified and cloned into a luciferase reporter gene. It has been reported that NgR1 expression is downregulated by neuronal activity [39]. To examine the effect of neuronal activity on the putative NgR1 3′ enhancer, we transfected 3′ enhancer reporter constructs with or without the rs701428 SNP into primary cortical neurons. Substantial increases in luciferase activity were observed for both constructs in the presence of the sodium channel blocker TTX and the NMDA receptor antagonist D-AP5, which blocks neuronal activity (fig. 4b). Conversely, neuronal depolarization by elevated potassium chloride (KCl) levels drastically decreased the transactivation activity of the NgR1 3′ region.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The region surrounding rs701428 acts as a neuronal activity-dependent enhancer modulated by Mybl2. a Schematic representation of NgR1 3′ enhancer reporter constructs. b The NgR1 3′ enhancer is downregulated by neuronal activation induced by KCl, and enhanced by blockade of neuronal activation by TTX and D-AP5. * p = 0.0079, ** p = 0.0017. c A representative Myb-binding motif within rs701428. Alleles of rs701428 are shown: the reference G allele (green; colors refer to the online version only) and the variant A allele (red). Mybl2 overexpression decreases transcriptional repression by neuronal activity of the NgR1 3′ enhancer with the schizophrenia risk rs701428-A allele (* p = 0.049; d) but not the reference-G allele (e), or with deletion of a region containing rs701428 (f). Data are presented as means ± SD, with each experiment conducted in triplicate.

The rs701428 SNP may alter transcription factor recruitment to the NgR1 3′ enhancer. We used JASPAR [40] to screen for potential transcription factor binding sites in the region surrounding rs701428 and found a binding affinity for the myeloblastosis (MYB) family for the schizophrenia risk rs701428-A allele but not for the reference G allele (fig. 4c). The MYB family contains three members (c-MYB, MYBL1, and MYBL2), which bind DNA with similar specificity [41,42]. MYBL2 overexpression specifically decreased the effects of neuronal activation on the transactivation activity of the 3′NgR1 enhancer with the schizophrenia risk rs701428-A allele (fig. 4d). In contrast, neither the 3′NgR1 enhancer containing the reference rs701428-G allele nor that with a deletion of a 5′ 700-bp region containing rs701428 was affected by MYBL2 overexpression (fig. 4e, f). To examine if the MYB transcription factor family binds to the region with the schizophrenia risk rs701428-A allele, we performed an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). The labeled schizophrenia risk rs701428-A allele probe, but not the labeled reference-G allele probe, formed a binding complex with c-MYB, MYBL1, and MYBL2 (fig. 5a, arrow). Furthermore, MYBL2 binding to the labeled rs701428-A allele probe was diminished in the presence of a 200-fold excess of unlabeled rs701428-A allele probe but not unlabeled reference-G allele probe (fig. 5b, arrow).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

DNA fragments containing the rs701428 schizophrenia risk A allele but not the reference G allele show specific binding to Myb family transcription factors. a Myb family transcription factor binding was examined using EMSA. 293T cells were transfected with vectors containing c-Myb, Mybl1, Mybl2, or no insert [negative control (NC)]. Nuclear extracts were prepared and an EMSA performed using reference G allele or schizophrenia risk A allele probes. A background band due to endogenous factors expressed in 293T cells is observed with the rs701428-A allele probe. b Specific binding of Mybl2 to the rs701428-A allele probe but not to the reference G allele probe. Mybl2-transfected nuclear extracts were incubated with labeled rs701428-A or -G allele probes. Binding was competed using a 200-fold molar excess of an unlabeled A or G allele competitor.

Discussion

In the present study, the rs701428 polymorphism located in the 3′ region of the NgR1 gene was found to be associated with CC structural variation in the human brain. Minor A allele carriers of this SNP, which was reported to be the risk allele for schizophrenia in a previous study [26], had larger whole CC volumes and lower RD in the central CC region than major G allele homozygous participants. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the NgR1 3′ region containing rs701428 is a neuronal activity-dependent enhancer, and that the schizophrenia risk allele A of rs701428 renders this enhancer susceptible to transcriptional regulation by MYBL2.

In 22q11.2DS, structural brain abnormalities that are likely to be developmental in nature have repeatedly been reported [14,20,22]. However, which genetic changes in this chromosomal region induce morphological brain abnormalities and how this occurs is not known. Our study is the first to implicate a specific gene as a candidate for the morphological changes to the brain observed in this syndrome, as well as a possible mechanism. Since the genetic polymorphism investigated in our study is associated with schizophrenia [26,27], the putative molecular mechanism identified may, in part, be involved in the neurodevelopmental manifestation of schizophrenia pathology.

NgR1, a receptor for Nogo-A, represses synaptogenesis and axonal sprouting [43] and is downregulated by neuronal activity [39,44,45]. This NgR1-mediated mechanism is thought to be important for restricting synaptic plasticity and maintaining preformed neuronal wiring [5,39]. We showed that the 3′ region of the NgR1 gene, containing rs701428, is a neuronal activity-dependent enhancer, and that the minor (schizophrenia risk) allele of rs701428 disinhibits repressive activity of this enhancer via MYBL2 binding. These results suggest that the risk allele may dysregulate NgR1 expression and consequently disturb the regulatory process of restricting synaptic plasticity, a requirement for normal neural circuitry development.

Our MRI analyses found that minor (schizophrenia risk) allele carriers have larger CC volumes. This finding is compatible with previous MRI studies reporting enlarged CC volumes in 22q11.2DS patients [18]. CC enlargement in rs701428 minor allele carriers may be reasonably expected, considering the putative role of NgR1 in neural circuitry formation [46]. NgR1 suppresses excessive branching of axon fibers [5]. The expression of NgR1 is downregulated by neuronal activation [39]. This mechanism plays pivotal roles in the neuronal activity-dependent regulation of axonal structures. Dysregulated NgR1 expression in minor allele carriers may disrupt normal synaptic pruning and may result in abnormal hypertrophic white matter tracts. As the CC is the largest white matter tract in the human brain, our MRI data, as well as previous MRI studies on 22q11.2DS, may have captured a more general process of white matter wiring abnormalities.

In schizophrenia, structural MRI studies are not unanimous with regard to the structural abnormalities of the CC. Both increased and decreased CC volumes in schizophrenia patients have previously been documented [47]. The white matter alteration in schizophrenia might be caused by the interaction between genetic variation within the 22q11.2 region and variation in other risk genes for schizophrenia, such as neuregulin 1 (NRG1), ERBB4, and disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1 (DISC1). Dysfunction of these genes has been reported to alter myelination, similarly to NgR1[48,49,50]. In humans, variation of ERBB4 was demonstrated to be associated with subcortical microstructure [51]. Therefore, the differential contributions of these multiple genes among individuals may result in the white matter structural variations of schizophrenia, reflecting the heterogeneity of the disease. Our data show that the putative neurodevelopmental molecular mechanism mediated by NgR1 may partially explain the white matter pathology of schizophrenia.

Furthermore, this NgR1 mechanism may also show regional specificity in addition to a process involving axonal development and synapse formation at the whole brain level. Indeed, our data show that minor allele carriers have decreased RD in the central region of the CC. DTI studies on 22q11.2DS are in agreement with this finding, showing a genetic effect localized in specific CC regions [21,22]. Our result, however, is inconsistent with that of Perlstein et al. [28], who investigated the effect of the same SNP, rs701428, and reported that the G allele is associated with reduced RD. The discrepancy might be due to the difference in the white matter regions reported to be associated with the allelic variation. In addition, it should be noted that Perlstein et al. investigated this association in 22q11.2DS individuals; a variation of NgR1 might have a complex genetic interaction with other genes in the deleted 22q11.2 region which are important for neuronal differentiation and function [11,52].

A major limitation of our study is its relatively small sample size. Another is that we focused on CC structure and not on the other brain abnormalities reported in 22q11.2DS. Our present results are highly preliminary until replicated with larger sample numbers.

In summary, our study shows that NgR1 can influence the macro- and microstructure of the white matter of the human brain. A frequently reported structural anomaly in 22q11.2DS, namely CC enlargement, can be partially affected by disrupted regulation of NgR1. Furthermore, a 22q11 mouse model study is expected to reveal the possible contribution of NgR1 to CC structural variation.

Statement of Ethics

Our study was approved by the Committee on Medical Ethics of Kyoto University and was conducted in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association.

Disclosure Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to extend their gratitude to Dr. Sin-ichi Urayama for his assistance in data acquisition and processing and, most of all, to the volunteers for participating in the study. This work was in part funded by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.

References

  • 1.GrandPré T, Li S, Strittmatter SM. Nogo-66 receptor antagonist peptide promotes axonal regeneration. Nature. 2002;417:547–551. doi: 10.1038/417547a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McGee AW, Strittmatter SM. The Nogo-66 receptor: focusing myelin inhibition of axon regeneration. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:193–198. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li S, Kim JE, Budel S, Hampton TG, Strittmatter SM. Transgenic inhibition of Nogo-66 receptor function allows axonal sprouting and improved locomotion after spinal injury. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005;29:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fournier AE, GrandPré T, Strittmatter SM. Identification of a receptor mediating Nogo-66 inhibition of axonal regeneration. Nature. 2001;409:341–346. doi: 10.1038/35053072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zagrebelsky M, Schweigreiter R, Bandtlow CE, Schwab ME, Korte M. Nogo-A stabilizes the architecture of hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2010;30:13220–13234. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1044-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Akbik FV, Bhagat SM, Patel PR, Cafferty WB, Strittmatter SM. Anatomical plasticity of adult brain is titrated by Nogo Receptor 1. Neuron. 2013;77:859–866. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hunt D, Mason MR, Campbell G, Coffin R, Anderson PN. Nogo receptor mRNA expression in intact and regenerating CNS neurons. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002;20:537–552. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2002.1153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Josephson A, Trifunovski A, Widmer HR, Widenfalk J, Olson L, Spenger C. Nogo-receptor gene activity: cellular localization and developmental regulation of mRNA in mice and humans. J Comp Neurol. 2002;453:292–304. doi: 10.1002/cne.10408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shaikh TH, Kurahashi H, Saitta SC, O'Hare AM, Hu P, Roe BA, Driscoll DA, McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EH, Budarf ML, Emanuel BS. Chromosome 22-specific low copy repeats and the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: genomic organization and deletion endpoint analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:489–501. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.4.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pulver AE, Nestadt G, Goldberg R, Shprintzen RJ, Lamacz M, Wolyniec PS, Morrow B, Karayiorgou M, Antonarakis SE, Housman D, Kucherlapati R. Psychotic illness in patients diagnosed with velo-cardio-facial syndrome and their relatives. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994;182:476–478. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199408000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Toritsuka M, Kimoto S, Muraki K, Landek-Salgado MA, Yoshida A, Yamamoto N, Horiuchi Y, Hiyama H, Tajinda K, Keni N, Illingworth E, Iwamoto T, Kishimoto T, Sawa A, Tanigaki K. Deficits in microRNA-mediated Cxcr4/Cxcl12 signaling in neurodevelopmental deficits in a 22q11 deletion syndrome mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:17552–17557. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312661110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Drew LJ, Crabtree GW, Markx S, Stark KL, Chaverneff F, Xu B, Mukai J, Fenelon K, Hsu PK, Gogos JA, Karayiorgou M. The 22q11.2 microdeletion: fifteen years of insights into the genetic and neural complexity of psychiatric disorders. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011;29:259–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chow EW, Mikulis DJ, Zipursky RB, Scutt LE, Weksberg R, Bassett AS. Qualitative MRI findings in adults with 22q11 deletion syndrome and schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;46:1436–1442. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00150-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van Amelsvoort T, Daly E, Robertson D, Suckling J, Ng V, Critchley H, Owen MJ, Henry J, Murphy KC, Murphy DG. Structural brain abnormalities associated with deletion at chromosome 22q11: quantitative neuroimaging study of adults with velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178:412–419. doi: 10.1192/bjp.178.5.412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sztriha L, Guerrini R, Harding B, Stewart F, Chelloug N, Johansen JG. Clinical, MRI, and pathological features of polymicrogyria in chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;127A:313–317. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eliez S, Schmitt JE, White CD, Reiss AL. Children and adolescents with velocardiofacial syndrome: a volumetric MRI study. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:409–415. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.3.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Debbane M, Schaer M, Farhoumand R, Glaser B, Eliez S. Hippocampal volume reduction in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:2360–2365. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ryan AK, Goodship JA, Wilson DI, Philip N, Levy A, Seidel H, Schuffenhauer S, Oechsler H, Belohradsky B, Prieur M, Aurias A, Raymond FL, Clayton-Smith J, Hatchwell E, McKeown C, Beemer FA, Dallapiccola B, Novelli G, Hurst JA, Ignatius J, Green AJ, Winter RM, Brueton L, Brøndum-Nielsen K, Scambler PJ, et al. Spectrum of clinical features associated with interstitial chromosome 22q11 deletions: a European collaborative study. J Med Genet. 1997;34:798–804. doi: 10.1136/jmg.34.10.798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Machado AM, Simon TJ, Nguyen V, McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EH, Gee JC. Corpus callosum morphology and ventricular size in chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Brain Res. 2007;1131:197–210. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tan GM, Arnone D, McIntosh AM, Ebmeier KP. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies in chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (velocardiofacial syndrome) Schizophr Res. 2009;115:173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Simon TJ, Ding L, Bish JP, McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EH, Gee J. Volumetric, connective, and morphologic changes in the brains of children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: an integrative study. Neuroimage. 2005;25:169–180. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Barnea-Goraly N, Menon V, Krasnow B, Ko A, Reiss A, Eliez S. Investigation of white matter structure in velocardiofacial syndrome: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:1863–1869. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.10.1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Arnone D, McIntosh AM, Tan GM, Ebmeier KP. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies of the corpus callosum in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008;101:124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.David AS. Schizophrenia and the corpus callosum: developmental, structural and functional relationships. Behav Brain Res. 1994;64:203–211. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90132-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.da Silva Alves F, Schmitz N, Bloemen O, van der Meer J, Meijer J, Boot E, Nederveen A, de Haan L, Linszen D, van Amelsvoort T. White matter abnormalities in adults with 22q11 deletion syndrome with and without schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2011;132:75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Budel S, Padukkavidana T, Liu BP, Feng Z, Hu F, Johnson S, Lauren J, Park JH, McGee AW, Liao J, Stillman A, Kim JE, Yang BZ, Sodi S, Gelernter J, Zhao H, Hisama F, Arnsten AF, Strittmatter SM. Genetic variants of Nogo-66 receptor with possible association to schizophrenia block myelin inhibition of axon growth. J Neurosci. 2008;28:13161–13172. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3828-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu H, Abecasis GR, Heath SC, Knowles A, Demars S, Chen YJ, Roos JL, Rapoport JL, Gogos JA, Karayiorgou M. Genetic variation in the 22q11 locus and susceptibility to schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:16859–16864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232186099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Perlstein MD, Chohan MR, Coman IL, Antshel KM, Fremont WP, Gnirke MH, Kikinis Z, Middleton FA, Radoeva PD, Shenton ME, Kates WR. White matter abnormalities in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: preliminary associations with the Nogo-66 receptor gene and symptoms of psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2014;152:117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, Buckner RL, Dale AM, Maguire RP, Hyman BT, Albert MS, Killiany RJ. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006;31:968–980. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Buckner RL, Head D, Parker J, Fotenos AF, Marcus D, Morris JC, Snyder AZ. A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume. Neuroimage. 2004;23:724–738. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Karolchik D, Barber GP, Casper J, Clawson H, Cline MS, Diekhans M, Dreszer TR, Fujita PA, Guruvadoo L, Haeussler M, Harte RA, Heitner S, Hinrichs AS, Learned K, Lee BT, Li CH, Raney BJ, Rhead B, Rosenbloom KR, Sloan CA, Speir ML, Zweig AS, Haussler D, Kuhn RM, Kent WJ. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2014 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(database issue):D764–D770. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Blanchette M, Kent WJ, Riemer C, Elnitski L, Smit AF, Roskin KM, Baertsch R, Rosenbloom K, Clawson H, Green ED, Haussler D, Miller W. Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset aligner. Genome Res. 2004;14:708–715. doi: 10.1101/gr.1933104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hesselberth JR, Chen X, Zhang Z, Sabo PJ, Sandstrom R, Reynolds AP, Thurman RE, Neph S, Kuehn MS, Noble WS, Fields S, Stamatoyannopoulos JA. Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting. Nat Methods. 2009;6:283–289. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Boyle AP, Song L, Lee BK, London D, Keefe D, Birney E, Iyer VR, Crawford GE, Furey TS. High-resolution genome-wide in vivo footprinting of diverse transcription factors in human cells. Genome Res. 2011;21:456–464. doi: 10.1101/gr.112656.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pique-Regi R, Degner JF, Pai AA, Gaffney DJ, Gilad Y, Pritchard JK. Accurate inference of transcription factor binding from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility data. Genome Res. 2011;21:447–455. doi: 10.1101/gr.112623.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Heintzman ND, Stuart RK, Hon G, Fu Y, Ching CW, Hawkins RD, Barrera LO, Van Calcar S, Qu C, Ching KA, Wang W, Weng Z, Green RD, Crawford GE, Ren B. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2007;39:311–318. doi: 10.1038/ng1966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Heintzman ND, Hon GC, Hawkins RD, Kheradpour P, Stark A, Harp LF, Ye Z, Lee LK, Stuart RK, Ching CW, Ching KA, Antosiewicz-Bourget JE, Liu H, Zhang X, Green RD, Lobanenkov VV, Stewart R, Thomson JA, Crawford GE, Kellis M, Ren B. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature. 2009;459:108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature07829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lupien M, Eeckhoute J, Meyer CA, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Li W, Carroll JS, Liu XS, Brown M. FoxA1 translates epigenetic signatures into enhancer-driven lineage-specific transcription. Cell. 2008;132:958–970. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wills ZP, Mandel-Brehm C, Mardinly AR, McCord AE, Giger RJ, Greenberg ME. The Nogo receptor family restricts synapse number in the developing hippocampus. Neuron. 2012;73:466–481. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mathelier A, Zhao X, Zhang AW, Parcy F, Worsley-Hunt R, Arenillas DJ, Buchman S, Chen CY, Chou A, Ienasescu H, Lim J, Shyr C, Tan G, Zhou M, Lenhard B, Sandelin A, Wasserman WW. JASPAR 2014: an extensively expanded and updated open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(database issue):D142–D147. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Howe KM, Watson RJ. Nucleotide preferences in sequence-specific recognition of DNA by c-myb protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:3913–3919. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.14.3913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Golay J, Loffarelli L, Luppi M, Castellano M, Introna M. The human A-myb protein is a strong activator of transcription. Oncogene. 1994;9:2469–2479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Craveiro LM, Hakkoum D, Weinmann O, Montani L, Stoppini L, Schwab ME. Neutralization of the membrane protein Nogo-A enhances growth and reactive sprouting in established organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28:1808–1824. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06473.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee H, Raiker SJ, Venkatesh K, Geary R, Robak LA, Zhang Y, Yeh HH, Shrager P, Giger RJ. Synaptic function for the Nogo-66 receptor NgR1: regulation of dendritic spine morphology and activity-dependent synaptic strength. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2753–2765. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5586-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Borrie SC, Baeumer BE, Bandtlow CE. The Nogo-66 receptor family in the intact and diseased CNS. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;349:105–117. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1332-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Whitford TJ, Savadjiev P, Kubicki M, O'Donnell LJ, Terry DP, Bouix S, Westin CF, Schneiderman JS, Bobrow L, Rausch AC, Niznikiewicz M, Nestor PG, Pantelis C, Wood SJ, McCarley RW, Shenton ME. Fiber geometry in the corpus callosum in schizophrenia: evidence for transcallosal misconnection. Schizophr Res. 2011;132:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shenton ME, Dickey CC, Frumin M, McCarley RW. A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2001;49:1–52. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(01)00163-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Michailov GV, Sereda MW, Brinkmann BG, Fischer TM, Haug B, Birchmeier C, Role L, Lai C, Schwab MH, Nave KA. Axonal neuregulin-1 regulates myelin sheath thickness. Science. 2004;304:700–703. doi: 10.1126/science.1095862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Roy K, Murtie JC, El-Khodor BF, Edgar N, Sardi SP, Hooks BM, Benoit-Marand M, Chen C, Moore H, O'Donnell P, Brunner D, Corfas G. Loss of erbB signaling in oligodendrocytes alters myelin and dopaminergic function, a potential mechanism for neuropsychiatric disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:8131–8136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702157104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wood JD, Bonath F, Kumar S, Ross CA, Cunliffe VT. Disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1 and neuregulin 1 are required for the specification of oligodendrocytes and neurones in the zebrafish brain. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:391–404. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Konrad A, Vucurevic G, Musso F, Stoeter P, Dahmen N, Winterer G. ErbB4 genotype predicts left frontotemporal structural connectivity in human brain. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34:641–650. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kimoto S, Muraki K, Toritsuka M, Mugikura S, Kajiwara K, Kishimoto T, Illingworth E, Tanigaki K. Selective overexpression of Comt in prefrontal cortex rescues schizophrenia-like phenotypes in a mouse model of 22q11 deletion syndrome. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2:e146. doi: 10.1038/tp.2012.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Neuropsychiatry are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES