Abstract
AIMS: To audit the information content of pathology reports of colorectal cancer specimens in one National Health Service region. METHODS: All reports of colorectal cancer resection specimens from the 17 NHS histopathology laboratories in Wales during 1993 were evaluated against: (a) standards previously agreed as desirable by pathologists in Wales; and (b) standards considered to be the minimum required for informed patient management. RESULTS: 1242 reports were audited. There was notable variation in the performance of different laboratories and in the completeness of reporting of individual items of information. While many items were generally well reported, only 51.5% (640/ 1242) of rectal cancer reports contained a statement on the completeness of excision at the circumferential resection margin and only 30% (373/1242) of all reports stated the number of involved lymph nodes. All of the previously agreed items were contained in only 11.3% (140/1242) of reports on colonic tumours and 4.0% (40/1242) of reports on rectal tumours. Seventy eight per cent (969/1242) of colonic carcinoma reports and 46.6% (579/ 1242) of rectal carcinoma reports met the minimum standards. CONCLUSIONS: The informational content of many routine pathology reports on colorectal cancer resection specimens is inadequate for quality patient management, for ensuring a clinically effective cancer service through audit, and for cancer registration. Template proforma reporting using nationally agreed standards is recommended as a remedy for this, along with improved education, review of laboratory practices in the light of current knowledge, and further motivation of pathologists through their involvement in multidisciplinary cancer management teams.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Adam I. J., Mohamdee M. O., Martin I. G., Scott N., Finan P. J., Johnston D., Dixon M. F., Quirke P. Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet. 1994 Sep 10;344(8924):707–711. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92206-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell F., Griffiths D. F. Quantitative audit of the content of histopathology reports. J Clin Pathol. 1994 Apr;47(4):360–361. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.4.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chan K. W., Boey J., Wong S. K. A method of reporting radial invasion and surgical clearance of rectal carcinoma. Histopathology. 1985 Dec;9(12):1319–1327. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1985.tb02813.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henson D. E., Hutter R. V., Sobin L. H., Bowman H. E. Protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with colorectal carcinoma. A basis for checklists. Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists. Task Force for Protocols on the Examination of Specimens from Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1994 Feb;118(2):122–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krook J. E., Moertel C. G., Gunderson L. L., Wieand H. S., Collins R. T., Beart R. W., Kubista T. P., Poon M. A., Meyers W. C., Mailliard J. A. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 14;324(11):709–715. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103143241101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ng I. O., Luk I. S., Yuen S. T., Lau P. W., Pritchett C. J., Ng M., Poon G. P., Ho J. Surgical lateral clearance in resected rectal carcinomas. A multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic features. Cancer. 1993 Mar 15;71(6):1972–1976. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930315)71:6<1972::aid-cncr2820710608>3.0.co;2-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quirke P., Durdey P., Dixon M. F., Williams N. S. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet. 1986 Nov 1;2(8514):996–999. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92612-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slevin M. L. Adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer. BMJ. 1996 Feb 17;312(7028):392–393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7028.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]