Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1997 Mar;50(3):241–244. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.3.241

Use of prototype automated blood culture system and gas-liquid chromatography for the analysis of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis associated infection.

C R Catchpole 1, F Macrae 1, J D Brown 1, M Palmer 1, D E Healing 1, N T Richards 1, T S Elliott 1
PMCID: PMC499820  PMID: 9155676

Abstract

AIMS: (1) To compare the recovery of organisms from continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) effluent fluid obtained from patients with clinical evidence of peritonitis, with an automated system (AS) and the Septichek blood culture system; (2) to evaluate the times to detection of organisms with the two systems; (3) to identify anaerobes from CAPD samples by extended anaerobic culture and gas-liquid chromatography (GLC). METHODS: 168 CAPD effluent fluid samples were studied, representing 157 episodes of peritonitis in 97 patients. CAPD samples were inoculated into two AS bottles-one anaerobic, one aerobic-and a Septichek bottle; samples were also examined for cell count, Gram stain, and direct culture. Culture bottles were then subcultured onto various media, and any organisms isolated were identified. After routine culture, GLC was performed on culture fluid in the anaerobic AS and Septichek bottles. When volatile fatty acids were detected, the broths were cultured anaerobically on specialised medium for a further five days. RESULTS: 147 organisms were isolated from the 168 samples: 96 (57%) yielded growth of significant organisms by direct culture, as compared to 129 (76.8%) by both AS and Septichek. There was no significant difference in isolation rates between AS and Septichek, but time to detection was more rapid with the AS system (p < 0.002). GLC showed volatile fatty acid in 15 specimens; of these, 14 subsequently grew anaerobic organisms. CONCLUSIONS: AS was comparable to Septichek for numbers of isolations. Speed to detection was faster with the AS, which may be an advantage in management of patients with CAPD peritonitis. GLC showed anaerobes in several cases which would not have been detected without prolonged anaerobic culture; thus anaerobic cultures are recommended for patients who are unresponsive to antimicrobials or who have evidence of bowel perforation.

Full text

PDF
241

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Diagnosis and management of peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Report of a working party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Lancet. 1987 Apr 11;1(8537):845–849. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doyle P. W., Crichton E. P., Mathias R. G., Werb R. Clinical and microbiological evaluation of four culture methods for the diagnosis of peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1206–1209. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1206-1209.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fenton P. Laboratory diagnosis of peritonitis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Clin Pathol. 1982 Nov;35(11):1181–1184. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.11.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Knight K. R., Polak A., Crump J., Maskell R. Laboratory diagnosis and oral treatment of CAPD peritonitis. Lancet. 1982 Dec 11;2(8311):1301–1304. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91509-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ludlam H. A., Price T. N., Berry A. J., Phillips I. Laboratory diagnosis of peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Sep;26(9):1757–1762. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.9.1757-1762.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ludlam H., Dickens A., Simpson A., Phillips I. A comparison of four culture methods for diagnosing infection in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Hosp Infect. 1990 Oct;16(3):263–269. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90115-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Males B. M., Walshe J. J., Garringer L., Koscinski D., Amsterdam D. Addi-Chek filtration, BACTEC, and 10-ml culture methods for recovery of microorganisms from dialysis effluent during episodes of peritonitis. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):350–353. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.350-353.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peterson P. K., Matzke G., Keane W. F. Current concepts in the management of peritonitis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Rev Infect Dis. 1987 May-Jun;9(3):604–612. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.3.604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ryan S., Fessia S. Improved method for recovery of peritonitis-causing microorganisms from peritoneal dialysate. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Feb;25(2):383–384. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.2.383-384.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Spencer R. C., Ahmad W. K. Laboratory diagnosis of peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis by lysis and centrifugation. J Clin Pathol. 1986 Aug;39(8):925–926. doi: 10.1136/jcp.39.8.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stevens C. M., Swaine D., Butler C., Carr A. H., Weightman A., Catchpole C. R., Healing D. E., Elliott T. S. Development of o.a.s.i.s., a new automated blood culture system in which detection is based on measurement of bottle headspace pressure changes. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1750–1756. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1750-1756.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Taylor P. C. Routine laboratory diagnosis of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis peritonitis using centrifugation/lysis and saponin-containing media. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Mar;13(3):249–252. doi: 10.1007/BF01974545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES