Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2016 Apr 8;95(14):e3231. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003231

Identifying Hemodialysis Patients With the Highest Risk of Staphylococcus aureus Endogenous Infection Through a Simple Nasal Sampling Algorithm

Paul O Verhoeven 1, Julie Gagnaire 1, Cyrille H Haddar 1, Florence Grattard 1, Damien Thibaudin 1, Aida Afiani 1, Céline Cazorla 1, Anne Carricajo 1, Christophe Mariat 1, Eric Alamartine 1, Frédéric Lucht 1, Olivier Garraud 1, Bruno Pozzetto 1, Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers 1, Philippe Berthelot 1
Editor: Duane Hospenthal1
PMCID: PMC4998774  PMID: 27057858

Abstract

In contrast to Staphylococcus aureus intermittent nasal carriers, persistent ones have the highest risk of infection. This study reports the usefulness of a simple nasal sampling algorithm to identify the S. aureus nasal carriage state of hemodialysis patients (HPs) and their subsequent risk of infection.

From a cohort of 85 HPs, 76 were screened for S. aureus nasal carriage once a week during a 10-week period. The S. aureus nasal load was quantified by using either culture on chromogenic medium or fully automated real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Molecular typing was used to compare strains from carriage and infection.

The algorithm based on quantitative cultures was able to determine the status of S. aureus nasal carriage with a sensitivity of 95.8%, a specificity of 94.2%, a positive predictive value of 88.5%, and a negative predictive value of 98.0%. Of note, the determination of the S. aureus carriage state was obtained on the first nasal sample for all the 76 HPs, but 1 (98.7%). The algorithm based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay directly from the specimen yielded similar performances. During the 1-year follow-up after the last sampling episode, HPs classified as persistent nasal carriers with the algorithm were found to have a higher risk of S. aureus infection than those classified as nonpersistent carriers (P < 0.05), especially for infections of endogenous origin (P < 0.001).

This simple algorithm is reliable for determining the S. aureus nasal carriage status in clinical practice and could contribute to characterize at an early stage of take-up patients with the highest risk of S. aureus infection.


KEY FINDING.

  • This prospective study reports the clinical validation of an algorithm based on 1 or 2 quantitative nasal samples for reliably predicting at an early stage the S. aureus nasal carriage state and the subsequent risk of infection in hemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION

The nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is a major risk factor of S. aureus infection, notably in hemodialysis patients (HPs).1 A recent meta-analysis confirmed that decolonization strategies using mupirocin were able to reduce the rate of S. aureus infection in this category of patients,2 although the risk of emergence of antimicrobial resistance persists.3,4 Approximately one-quarter of the general population is colonized by S. aureus in the anterior part of the nostril (vestibulum nasi).5 Three main categories of nasal carriers have been historically identified: persistent carriers (20% [12%–30%]), intermittent carriers (30% [16%–70%]), and noncarriers (50% [16%–69%]).1,6 By contrast to intermittent carriers and noncarriers, persistent nasal carriers have a higher risk of S. aureus infection, especially those in continuous peritoneal dialysis7 and in orthopedic surgery.8

Persistent carriers are characterized by a higher nasal bacterial load,9,10 a longer duration of carriage,11 a lower rate of exchange of S. aureus strains,12,13 and a particular affinity for the carried strain.11 However, there is no consensual definition of this persistent carriage state. In previous studies aimed to define the S. aureus carriage state, 5 to 12 nasal sampling episodes were realized for a period ranging from 5 weeks to 8 years.7,10,13,14 The index of carriage, corresponding to the number of samples positive for S. aureus divided by the total number of samples, has been proposed to standardize the definition of the carriage state.13 According to these reference tools, it is almost impossible to determine the nasal carriage state in routine practice. Nouwen et al9 proposed a “culture rule” based on 2 qualitative cultures from nasal specimens taken 7 days apart, with positive and negative predictive values of 0.79 and 0.99, respectively, for distinguishing persistent and nonpersistent nasal carriers. This approach was used mainly for research purposes5 because it remains difficult to obtain systematically 2 nasal samples within 1 week in clinical practice.

Recently, we described an algorithm based on 1 or 2 quantitative cultures from nasal samples taken within 2 days that was able to distinguish accurately persistent and nonpersistent nasal carriers of S. aureus; only 1 nasal sample was needed in more than 9 cases out of 10.10 The aim of the present study was to assess prospectively the reliability of this algorithm in clinical practice in a cohort of HPs and to check its ability for identifying patients with the highest risk of S. aureus infection.

METHODS

Population

The study was proposed to HPs of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, France, and of the nearby ambulatory hemodialysis center ARTIC 42, between January 2012 and March 2013. Included subjects were aged 25 years or older and possessed a health insurance. They were not enrolled if at least 1 of the following exclusion criteria was recorded: carrier state of S. aureus already determined; chronic soft skin tissue infection due to S. aureus or eczema; ongoing or completed antibiotic treatment for less than 15 days; nasal decolonization by mupirocin or skin decolonization by antiseptic bath for at least 5 consecutive days in the previous year; pregnancy; HIV infection; and hemostasis disorder. Secondary exclusion criteria were as follows: 2 first nasal samples taken in more than 7 days; follow-up after inclusion of less than 10 weeks; less than 7 sampling episodes; and declaration of pregnancy after inclusion. For patients treated with antimicrobials during the follow-up, the nasal screening was discontinued and started again at least 15 days after the end of the treatment.

Nasal Sampling Procedure

Nasal samples were taken by the nursing staff of the ward using nylon flocked swab (eswab, ref 480CE, Copan, Brescia, Italy). Before taking the sample, swabs were wetted using an additional tube containing a sponge impregnated with normal saline solution and manufactured by Copan for the study purposes. Except for a few numbers of samples (less than 5%) that were stored at 4°C for a few hours, the samples were processed immediately after sampling because of the vicinity between the 2 hemodialysis centers and the laboratory.

Microbiological Methods

A 100-μL volume of nasal specimen was plated onto chromogenic agar (CHROMagar Staph aureus, Becton Dickinson). The identification of presumptive colonies was confirmed by using Microflex LT mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The S. aureus nasal load of the first 2 swabs was determined by both culture onto chromogenic agar and full automated quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (Xpert MRSA/SA Nasal, Cepheid) as previously described.15

Definition of the Reference Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage State

The HPs were sampled over a 10-week period using at least 7 and at most 12 sampling episodes. S. aureus-persistent nasal carriers were defined by an index of carriage greater than or equal to 0.8, and S. aureus-intermittent nasal carriers by a positive index of carriage lower than 0.8.13

Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage State Defined by the Algorithm

The algorithm used in the study was previously built from healthcare workers.10 Subjects were classified as persistent nasal carriers if the S. aureus nasal load was greater than 103 colony-forming unit (CFU)/swab on the first swab or greater than 102 CFU/swab on the first 2 nasal swabs. In other cases, they were classified as nonpersistent carriers.

Staphylococcus aureus Infection in HPs

S. aureus infection in HPs was prospectively recorded during 1 year after the last sampling by hemodialysis practitioners. The files of the microbiology laboratory were also screened for identifying potential infection due to this bacterium. The definite validation of S. aureus infection was established by an infectious disease specialist (EBN). The relationship between the strains isolated from colonization and infection was established by using arbitrarily-primed PCR, spa-typing, and DNA microarray (StaphyType kit, Alere, Jouy-en-Josas, France), as previously described.1618

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive variables, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were reported with their 95% confidence interval (CI). Parametric and nonparametric tests were performed using MedCalc software v13.1.2 (Ostend, Belgium). P values under 5% were considered to be statistically significant.

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by the regional ethical committee (“Comité de protection des personnes Sud-Est 1”). All the participants gave their informed written consent before entry into the study.

RESULTS

Study Population

Eighty-five HPs were enrolled into the study between January 2012 and March 2013. Nine of them were excluded secondarily according to the criteria described in the above section. Consequently, 76 HPs were included in the data analysis (mean age 70.0 years, SD 11.0; M/F sex ratio 1.37). Three of them received antimicrobial drugs during the follow-up period; as mentioned above, the nasal screening was stopped during the treatment and was restarted at least 15 days after the cessation of antimicrobial therapy. The flow chart of the study is depicted in the Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flow chart of the study. n/a = not applicable because the nasal carriage status was already assigned with the first nasal sample, NBL = nasal bacterial load of Staphylococcus aureus, SA = S. aureus.

Prospective Validation of the Algorithm in Clinical Routine Practice

First, the reference nasal carriage status of each HP was determined by using a mean of 11.4 samples per patient (SD 0.7) over a mean period of 10.3 weeks (SD 0.6). The median and the mean delays between the first 2 consecutive samples were 2.0 and 2.2 (SD 0.4) days, respectively. A total of 44 S. aureus nasal carriers (57.9%) were identified during the period of follow-up, including 24 persistent carriers (31.6%) and 20 intermittent carriers (26.3%) (Figure 1). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was identified in 11 nasal carriers (14.5%), including 9 persistent and 2 intermittent ones. The S. aureus nasal load was found higher in patients with persistent nasal carriage (mean of 6.0 log CFU/swab) than in patients with intermittent nasal carriage (mean of 1.1 log CFU/swab) (P < 0.0001 by Welch test). The algorithm based on quantitative culture was applied and found able to classify persistent and nonpersistent carriers with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (95% confidence interval [CI] of 95.8% (95% CI 78.9–99.9), 94.2% (95% CI 84.1–98.8), 88.5% (95% CI 69.9–97.6), and 98.0% (95% CI 89.4–100), respectively. Identical results were obtained with the qPCR assay (Table 1). The determination of the S. aureus carriage state was obtained on the first nasal sample for all the 76 HPs, but 1 (98.7%) (Figure 1). As shown in Table 2, 3 nonpersistent carriers were misclassified as persistent carriers by using the algorithm, whereas the opposite pattern was observed in 1 case. It is worthwhile to note that 2 of the 3 carriers classified as persistent with the algorithm exhibited an index of carriage greater than 0.7 (Table 2).

TABLE 1.

Performances of the Algorithm Based on 1 or 2 Nasal Samples

graphic file with name medi-95-e3231-g002.jpg

TABLE 2.

Discrepant Results Between the Reference Definition of Nasal Carriage State and the Algorithm Based on Quantitative Culture or qPCR

graphic file with name medi-95-e3231-g003.jpg

Table 3 describes the demographic and clinical characteristics of the group of persistent carriers compared with that of nonpersistent carriers according to the algorithm based on 1 or 2 nasal samples. No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups for any of the items listed in Table 3.

TABLE 3.

Characteristics of the Hemodialysis Patients According to the S. aureus Nasal Carriage Status as Determined by the Algorithm Based on 1 or 2 Nasal Samples

graphic file with name medi-95-e3231-g004.jpg

Risk of Staphylococcus aureus Infection in HPs

The 76 HPs were followed up during a whole year after the last sampling episode, except for 1 patient who died after 11 months of follow-up. Eighteen S. aureus infections were recorded; Table 4 displays their characteristics and treatment in persistent and nonpersistent carriers according to the algorithm based on 1 or 2 nasal samples. No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups for any of the listed items.

TABLE 4.

Characteristics of S. aureus Infections in Hemodialysis Patients According to the S. aureus Nasal Carriage Status as Determined by the Algorithm Based on 1 or 2 Nasal Samples

graphic file with name medi-95-e3231-g005.jpg

As shown in Table 5, the algorithm based on culture or qPCR was found able to characterize reliably the persistent nasal carriers at higher risk of S. aureus infection. By using both strategies, persistent carriers exhibited a statistically significant higher risk of S. aureus infection than nonpersistent ones (Table 5).

TABLE 5.

Bacterial Infections in Hemodialysis Patients According to the Nasal Carriage Status Determined by the Reference Definition or by the Algorithm Based on 1 or 2 Nasal Samples

graphic file with name medi-95-e3231-g006.jpg

Three typing methods were used for analyzing endogenous versus exogenous S. aureus infections. By using both strategies, persistent nasal carriers of S. aureus were found to have a statistically significant higher risk of endogenous infection than nonpersistent nasal carriers (Table 5). In contrast, the number of bacterial infections caused by species other than S. aureus did not differ significantly between persistent and nonpersistent nasal carriers of S. aureus (Table 5).

DISCUSSION

The S. aureus-persistent nasal carriers are considered at higher risk of S. aureus infection,1 but the nasal carrier status of patients is very difficult to determine in routine clinical practice. Van Belkum et al11 proposed a reclassification of nasal carriage by recognizing only the persistent and the nonpersistent nasal carriage of S. aureus. This classification is notably argued by the fact that the probability to detect an intermittent carrier increases with the number of nasal samples taken in the noncarrier group.1

To our knowledge, before our works, only 1 published study9 had described a reliable method, called the “culture rule,” for characterizing the S. aureus nasal carriage state by using qualitative culture on 2 nasal samples taken 7 days apart. The present study reports the prospective evaluation of a faster method based on a simple algorithm that was shown able to identify the nasal carriage state of S. aureus in routine clinical practice. This algorithm was described on retrospective specimens from healthcare workers10; it is based on the determination of the S. aureus load in 1 or, exceptionally, 2 nasal specimens. In the present study, the nasal samplings were performed by a large number of healthcare workers including nurses, medical doctors, and students just orally informed of the sampling procedure. Despite this heterogeneity, the algorithm was shown to be accurate for distinguishing, in routine clinical practice, persistent from nonpersistent carriers of S. aureus by using only 1 nasal sample in most of the cases. The performances of the algorithm were found to be close to those of the reference method based on at least 7 sampling episodes. A small proportion of samples were misclassified as persistent with the algorithm, whereas they corresponded to intermittent carriers with the reference method, which could lead to overestimate the number of persistent carriers; in contrast, the opposite situation, which could result in neglecting true persistent carriers, was exceptional (Figure 1).

Of interest, a fully automated qPCR method could be used for quantifying the nasal load of S. aureus with a result available in less than 2 hours and performances very similar to those of quantitative culture. It is important to notice that the sampling step has an impact on the quantification of the S. aureus load; we both recommend the use of nylon flocked swabs that increase the recovered bacterial load16 and swab wetting with normal saline solution before nasal sampling.19

This algorithm exhibits several advantages: the S. aureus nasal carrier state can be determined very shortly (less than 2 hours by molecular biology and less than 24 hours by bacterial culture), with only 1 nasal sample in more than 95 % of cases; the performances of the algorithm in terms of sensitivity and specificity are similar to that of the reference method; the cost of this determination is significantly cheaper and less invasive as compared with the reference method10; and finally, the sampling can be performed easily by a variety of nursing personnel without impacting the quality of the results.

Two previous studies performed in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis7 and in orthopedic surgery8 demonstrated that persistent nasal carriers of S. aureus have an increased risk of S. aureus infection by comparison with intermittent carriers and noncarriers. The results of the present study show for the first time that S. aureus-persistent nasal carriage increases significantly the risk of staphylococcal infection in HPs, whereas no difference was observed for infection with other bacterial species. Interestingly, the persistent nasal carriers were shown by using molecular typing methods to exhibit a statistically significant higher risk to be infected by the S. aureus strain recovered from their nose than nonpersistent ones.

Decolonization using mupirocin has been proven effective for reducing S. aureus infection rate in both HPs and chronic peritoneal dialysis patients.2 However, the modality of administration of this drug remains controversial20 because of the risk of emergence of antimicrobial resistance in S. aureus isolates.3 By using the proposed algorithm on a routine basis for the characterization of nasal carriage state in HPs, decolonization strategies could be limited to persistent nasal carriers who exhibit the highest risk of staphylococcal infection with their nasal strain, which implies an easy and early targeting of at-risk patients and would result in an important reduction of mupirocin consumption. In the present study, S. aureus nasal carriage was detected in approximately two-third of the patients. According to the rule defined just above, a decolonization protocol would have been applied to only half of them, those found to be persistent carriers, thus at higher risk of S. aureus infection with their own strain, but would have been avoided in nonpersistent carriers with a lower risk of S. aureus infection and mostly due to exogenous strains.

The main limitation of the study lies in the absence of verification of the nasal carrier state during the 1-year follow-up and notably at the time of S. aureus infection; due to the absence of consensual definition for persistent nasal carriage, we assumed that the nasal carrier state was stable through time, given the short duration of the follow-up, which constitutes another limitation of this study.

In conclusion, the simple nasal sampling algorithm prospectively tested in this study under routine clinical practice was shown to be accurate and robust for characterizing S. aureus nasal carriage status by using only 1 nasal sample in more than 95% of HPs and thus to better recognize patients with the highest risk of S. aureus infection. This approach could be considered as a simpler alternative to the “culture rule” for determining the carriage status of HPs on a routine basis. There is still a need for further clinical studies aimed at determining whether the same strategy could be useful to prevent infections in other clinical conditions than hemodialysis, including orthopedic surgery.

Acknowledgments

The investigators are indebted to all the patients and healthy volunteers enrolled into the study. They also thank the medical and nursing staff of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne and of the ARTIC42 Center involved in the sampling collection. Amélie Epercieux and Marine Servant are acknowledged for their skilful technical assistance.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CFU = colony-forming unit, CI = confidence interval, DNA = desoxyribonucleic acid, HPs = hemodialysis patients, nd = not determined, NS = not significant, PCR = polymerase chain reaction, qPCR = quantitative PCR, SD = standard deviation, SE = sampling episode.

Contribution of each author: POV, FG, CC, FL, OG, and PB designed the study. DT, AA, CM, and EA included and followed the patients. JG, CM, EBN, and PB reviewed the clinical criteria of evaluation. POV, CH, JG, CHH, and AC reviewed the microbiological data. POV, JG, FG, BP, EBN, and PB analyzed the results of the study. POV, FG, BP, and PB wrote the article. All the co-authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding: This study was supported by a grant of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne (protocol no. 0432–1108059). Nasal swabs were provided free of charge by Copan, Italia.

Conflicts of interests: POV received travel grants form Alere and Cepheid.

Other authors have nothing to declare in relation with the subject of this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wertheim HFL, Melles DC, Vos MC, et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5:751–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nair R, Perencevich EN, Blevins AE, et al. Clinical effectiveness of mupirocin for preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections in non-surgical settings: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:618–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee AS, Macedo-Vinas M, François P, et al. Trends in mupirocin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and mupirocin consumption at a tertiary care hospital. J Hosp Infect 2011; 77:360–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Patel JB, Gorwitz RJ, Jernigan JA. Mupirocin resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:935–941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Verhoeven PO, Gagnaire J, Botelho-Nevers E, et al. Detection and clinical relevance of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage: an update. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2014; 12:75–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Williams RE. Healthy carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: its prevalence and importance. Bacteriol Rev 1963; 27:56–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nouwen JL, Fieren MWJA, Snijders S, et al. Persistent (not intermittent) nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is the determinant of CPD-related infections. Kidney Int 2005; 67:1084–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kalmeijer MD, van Nieuwland-Bollen E, Bogaers-Hofman D, et al. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is a major risk factor for surgical-site infections in orthopedic surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21:319–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nouwen JL, Ott A, Kluytmans-Vandenbergh MFQ, et al. Predicting the Staphylococcus aureus nasal carrier state: derivation and validation of a ‘Culture Rule’. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:806–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Verhoeven PO, Grattard F, Carricajo A, et al. An algorithm based on one or two nasal samples is accurate to identify persistent nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18:551–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Van Belkum A, Verkaik NJ, de Vogel CP, et al. Reclassification of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage types. J Infect Dis 2009; 199:1820–1826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Van Belkum A, Eriksen NHR, Sijmons M, et al. Coagulase and protein A polymorphisms do not contribute to persistence of nasal colonisation by Staphylococcus aureus. J Microbiol Methods 1997; 46:222–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.VandenBergh MFQ, Yzerman EPF, van Belkum A, et al. Follow-up of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage after 8 years: redefining the persistent carrier state. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:3133–3140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cespedes C, Saïd-Salim B, Miller M, et al. The clonality of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. J Infect Dis 2005; 191:444–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Verhoeven PO, Grattard F, Carricajo A, et al. Quantification by real-time PCR assay of Staphylococcus aureus load: a useful tool for rapidly identifying persistent nasal carriers. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50:2063–2065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Verhoeven P, Grattard F, Carricajo A, et al. Better detection of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage by use of nylon flocked swabs. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48:4242–4244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W, et al. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:5442–5448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Luedicke C, Slickers P, Ehricht R, et al. Molecular fingerprinting of Staphylococcus aureus from bone and joint infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010; 29:457–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jones G, Matthews R, Cunningham R, et al. Comparison of automated processing of flocked swabs with manual processing of fiber swabs for detection of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49:2717–2718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Simor AE. Staphylococcal decolonisation: an effective strategy for prevention of infection? Lancet Infect Dis 2011; 11:952–962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES