Table 2.
Connections | Structural connectivity (mean ± SD) | Corrected p value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | SWEDD | PD | PD-NC | SWEDD-NC | SWEDD-PD | |
Associative cortex–caudate | 0.671 ± 1.381 | 0.299 ± 0.453 | 0.232 ± 0.319 | 0.017 | 0.054 | 0.214 |
Associative cortex–putamen | 3.452 ± 1.561 | 3.471 ± 1.517 | 3.734 ± 1.771 | 0.228 | 0.487 | 0.232 |
Associative cortex–thalamus | 0.833 ± 0.488 | 0.650 ± 0.367 | 1.173 ± 0.750 | 0.009 | 0.032 | <0.001 |
Limbic cortex–caudate | 2.197 ± 1.463 | 1.902 ± 1.310 | 0.710 ± 1.215 | <0.001 | 0.162 | <0.001 |
Limbic cortex–putamen | 3.175 ± 1.272 | 3.271 ± 1.474 | 2.557 ± 1.147 | 0.013 | 0.387 | 0.008 |
Limbic cortex–thalamus | 1.535 ± 0.810 | 1.379 ± 0.866 | 1.054 ± 0.889 | 0.005 | 0.194 | 0.048 |
Sensorimotor cortex–caudate | 0.430 ± 0.993 | 0.170 ± 0.471 | 0.053 ± 0.076 | <0.001 | 0.062 | 0.016 |
Sensorimotor cortex–putamen | 1.250 ± 0.742 | 1.485 ± 0.930 | 1.728 ± 1.108 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.027 |
Sensorimotor cortex–thalamus | 0.964 ± 0.574 | 0.947 ± 0.537 | 1.019 ± 0.703 | 0.325 | 0.511 | 0.292 |
Pallidum–caudate | 0.676 ± 0.644 | 0.838 ± 0.744 | 0.631 ± 0.825 | 0.374 | 0.145 | 0.112 |
Pallidum–putamen | 2.166 ± 0.898 | 1.840 ± 0.917 | 1.283 ± 0.522 | <0.001 | 0.045 | <0.001 |
Pallidum–thalamus | 0.799 ± 0.519 | 0.926 ± 0.523 | 0.565 ± 0.452 | 0.007 | 0.143 | <0.001 |
Putamen–thalamus | 0.439 ± 0.437 | 0.477 ± 0.388 | 0.346 ± 0.298 | 0.132 | 0.295 | 0.044 |
Substantia nigra–putamen | 0.004 ± 0.017 | 0.001 ± 0.004 | 0.004 ± 0.015 | 0.496 | 0.179 | 0.192 |
Substantia nigra–thalamus | 0.001 ± 0.005 | 0.004 ± 0.012 | 0.009 ± 0.003 | 0.193 | 0.045 | 0.223 |
Substantia nigra–pallidum | 0.096 ± 0.243 | 0.095 ± 0.363 | 0.160 ± 0.129 | 0.210 | 0.485 | 0.350 |
Structural connectivity values based on fiber density were reported for 16 connections within the CBGT circuit. The values were reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Group-wise differences in NC-PD, SWEDD-NC and SWEDD-PD comparisons were reported using corrected p values. The italicised text shows identified connections with significant differences among the three comparisons