Abstract
Objective
To assess sildenafil and N-desmethyl sildenafil (DMS) exposure in infants receiving sildenafil for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH).
Study design
Data were collected from 6 infants receiving sildenafil for the treatment of PH, and plasma samples were collected at the time of routine laboratory blood draws. The echocardiography results were assessed for improvement in right ventricular (RV) hypertension following sildenafil treatment.
Result
The median (range) sildenafil and DMS concentrations were 27.4 ng/mL (2.6-434.0) and 105.5 ng/mL (3.6-314.0), respectively. The median metabolite-to-parent ratio was higher in infants receiving co-medications that can induce cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (5.2 vs. 0.7). The echocardiography results showed improvement in RV hypertension for the majority of infants (5/6).
Conclusion
The concentrations of sildenafil and DMS were within the previously observed ranges. Our results suggest that caution may be warranted when CYP-related co-medications are administered during sildenafil treatment for PH.
Introduction
Sildenafil is a phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor approved in adults for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Sildenafil-mediated inhibition of phosphodiesterase type-5 leads to an increase in intracellular cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which results in pulmonary vasodilation.1,2 In infants, PH affects term infants (often called persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn) and premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and associated pulmonary arterial hypertension.3–5 Few clinical studies have evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and use of sildenafil in infants, yet the use in premature infants is increasing.6 In 2012, the Food and Drug Administration issued a black box warning for sildenafil use in children (ages 1 through 17 years). Despite this warning, sildenafil is still used in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and pulmonary arterial hypertension. The relationship between sildenafil dosing, safety, and efficacy in infants is currently unclear, and further studies are required to better understand sildenafil disposition in infants.
In adults, the PK of sildenafil have been extensively investigated. Sildenafil is highly protein bound (96%) and is distributed throughout the body (volume of distribution=1-2 L/kg).7,8 After oral administration, the apparent terminal elimination half-life of sildenafil in adults is 3-5 hours,8–10 and it undergoes almost complete hepatic metabolism.11,12 The major circulating metabolite of sildenafil is N-desmethyl sildenafil (DMS), which is active and is reported to have 50% in vitro potency of sildenafil.11 Previously published studies have reported that the major pathways of sildenafil biotransformation are cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes 3A4 (CYP3A4) (∼80%) and 2C9 (CYP2C9) (∼20%).11,12 Currently, limited information exists about the impact of ontogeny of CYP enzyme on the PK of sildenafil in infants.
Few studies have evaluated the PK of sildenafil in term infants and none in premature infants.13,14 This is due to the challenges associated with conducting clinical trials in infants, including limited vascular access for PK sampling and blood volumes. Opportunistic study designs can help overcome these challenges by capitalizing on blood sampling from standard medical care procedures.15–18
In this opportunistic study, we collected data from six infants (five premature and one full-term) to evaluate the disposition of sildenafil and DMS.
Methods
Patient population
From 2010-2012, plasma samples were collected from infants receiving sildenafil enterally (by nasogastric tube) for the treatment of PH at the time of routine blood draws as part of standard of care labs. All infants were enrolled at the Newborn Critical Care Center at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Children's Hospital. The following information was collected for each infant enrolled: gender, gestational age, postnatal age, and weight at first dose and concomitant medications (only systemically administered drugs with known interactions with the CYP450 pathways). The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board (IRB number: 10-0865). Written informed consent was obtained from the parent/guardian of each infant for use of the opportunistic data for research purposes.
Dosing and sample collection
Dosing information was obtained for at least five doses prior to the plasma samples collected for PK analyses. Because this was an opportunistic study design, the dosing varied and was determined by the treating clinician, not by protocol. In addition, PK sample collection was performed during time of routine blood draws as ordered by the treating physician, and thus occurred at differing time intervals. Samples were collected and stored at -80°C until further analysis. Echocardiography data were collected in all six infants.
Determination of sildenafil and DMS plasma concentrations
A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) analysis was performed by Covance Laboratories Inc. (Madison, WI). Plasma samples were analyzed for concentrations of sildenafil and DMS using an LC/MS/MS detection system comprising a Shimadzu HPLC and API 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). Sildenafil-d8 and N-desmethyl sildenafil-d8 were used as internal standards for sildenafil and DMS, respectively. The standards were prepared in plasma. The assay accuracy ranged from 100.2% to 107.3% for sildenafil and -96.1% to 110% for DMS. Method imprecision for plasma quality control samples at concentrations of 3, 30, and 350 ng/mL was 0.9, 1.5, and 9.81% coefficient of variation (CV), respectively, for sildenafil, and 7.95, 3.78, and 0.02% CV, respectively, for DMS. The lower limit of quantification for sildenafil and DMS in human plasma was 1 ng/mL for both analytes (range: 1-500 ng/mL for sildenafil and DMS). Peak areas were integrated and analyzed using Analyst software (version 1.5.1; Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA).
Data analysis
The sildenafil and DMS concentrations and the metabolite-to-parent ratios (calculated from individual data points) for each infant were analyzed.
Results
Patient characteristics
Six infants were enrolled; the median (range) gestational age was 25.6 weeks (23.6-38.7, Table 1). The median (range) body weight and postnatal age at the start of first dose were 3.2 kg (2.0-5.9) and 145 days (10-209), respectively. Sildenafil dose varied with time in different infants, with a median dose of 3 mg (1.5-9.2) or 0.92 mg/kg (0.5-2.1). Overall, five samples for each infant were collected and analyzed for sildenafil and DMS concentrations. The sample collection times varied between infants, ranging from 0-11 hours after the last dose.
Table 1. Summary of patient characteristics.
Infant | Gender | Gestational age (weeks) | Body weight (kg)* | Postnatal age (days)* | CYP co-medication† |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | F | 25.4 | 2.00 | 110 | Dexamethasone |
2 | F | 27.6 | 4.12 | 124 | Phenobarbital |
3 | F | 25.1 | 5.94 | 209 | - |
4 | F | 23.6 | 5.07 | 193 | Phenobarbital |
5 | F | 38.7 | 2.68 | 10 | - |
6 | M | 24.1 | 2.67 | 104 | Dexamethasone |
At the start of first dose.
Only systemically administered co-medications were considered.
During sildenafil treatment, all infants were receiving concomitant medications, and four out of six infants were administered inducers of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 (dexamethasone and phenobarbital) (Table 1).
The echocardiography data were obtained and the right ventricular (RV) pressure was evaluated in the infants. The majority of infants (five out of six) showed improvement in RV hypertension with time following sildenafil treatment.
Pharmacokinetics
A total of 30 samples were collected from all infants, and all but one sample were above the lower limit of quantification. The median (range) of concentration values obtained for sildenafil and DMS in all infants were 27.4 ng/mL (2.6-434.0) and 105.5 ng/mL (3.6-314.0), respectively. A high metabolite-to-parent ratio was observed in infants who were receiving additional drugs known to induce CYP enzymes (Table 2). The median (range) metabolite-to-parent ratio for infants receiving no CYP-related co-medications (infants 3 and 5) was 0.7 (0.3-1.0) versus 5.2 (1.1-14.5) for those receiving CYP-related co-medications.
Table 2. Doses, observed concentrations of sildenafil and N-desmethyl-sildenafil (DMS), and metabolite-to-parent ratios.
Infant | Median dose (mg) (range) | Median sildenafil concentration (ng/mL) (range) | Median DMS concentration (ng/mL) (range) | Median metabolite-to-parent ratio (range) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.5 (1.5-5.0) | 22.7 (2.6-37.6) | 108.0 (10.4-171.0) | 4.2 (3.1-7.5) |
2 | 3.6 | 21.5 (7.1-30.0) | 168.0 (103.0-247.0) | 8.5 (7.7-14.5) |
3 | 3.0 | 25.4 (5.5-35.4) | 14.8 (3.6-28.0) | 0.7 (0.3-0.8) |
4 | 3.7 (2.5-8.0) | 26.5 (9.4-40.7) | 111 (10.2-249.0) | 5.9 (1.1-8.8) |
5 | 3.9 (2.6-3.9) | 114.0 (35.6-434.0) | 82.4 (32.0-120.0) | 0.7 (0.3-1.0) |
6 | 8.6 (6.4-9.2) | 54.4 (21.7-162.0) | 172 (102.0-314.0) | 3.2 (1.9-5.1) |
Discussion
In this opportunistic study, we assessed the concentrations of sildenafil and DMS in infants who were undergoing treatment for PH. The observed concentrations of sildenafil and DMS were within the range of values that were previously reported.14 Our results suggest that potential CYP-mediated drug interactions may play an important role in the disposition of sildenafil.
PH is a devastating cardiopulmonary complication in premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and full-term infants with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Sildenafil is frequently prescribed to both of these populations without adequate safety and efficacy information. Neonatologists generally use echocardiograms to diagnose and monitor PH in infants, as there are no validated tests to evaluate the severity of PH in infants (such as the walking test in adults).19,20 Regardless, the echocardiography results from our study demonstrated that the majority of infants (five out of six) had improvement in RV hypertension, which is consistent with a recent study in premature infants treated with sildenafil for bronchopulmonary dysplasia and PH.21 These authors reported that although an echocardiographic improvement occurred in the majority of infants, fewer infants had clinical improvement.21 Taken together, these data support the idea that sildenafil may be of therapeutic benefit, and future studies should focus on the optimal dose, schedule, and duration in this vulnerable population. Catheterization studies sometimes show large differences between measured RV pressure and that estimated from a tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity from echocardiogram. Finally, there is a need to validate the use of echocardiography as an appropriate pharmacodynamic endpoint to diagnose and monitor PH in infants and assess the adequacy of PH treatment in infants.
A previous study assessed the population PK of intravenously administered sildenafil in term infants up to 7 days of age.13 Another report investigated the PK of sildenafil after enteral administration in neonates.14 However, high interpatient variability was associated in both of these studies.13,14 In our study, due to the small sample size, overall sparseness of the data, and poor reliability of sildenafil dosing times from the medical records, we were unable to perform a formal PK analysis. Thus, sildenafil and DMS exposure values were compared to previously reported values from a PK study of sildenafil administered enterally in neonates.14 The concentrations of sildenafil and DMS observed in our study were within the approximate concentration ranges observed in the previous study.14
Our results show that higher metabolite-to-parent ratios were observed in infants receiving co-medications that are inducers of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 as compared to infants who did not receive any CYP-related co-medications (Table 2). Little is currently known regarding the effect of ontogeny of CYP enzymes on the disposition of sildenafil, especially in premature infants. Previous in vitro studies have shown that the downregulation of CYP3A7 (a fetal CYP3A isoform) and concurrent upregulation of CYP3A4 and expression of CYP2C9 in fetal livers increase rapidly within 1 month after birth.22–24 In line with these findings, one study reported an increase in sildenafil clearance in the first week of life after intravenous sildenafil administration in term infants.13 Collectively, these findings support that sildenafil levels should be carefully monitored in infants with PH when CYP-related co-medications are administered.
Although sildenafil is widely used in clinic for the treatment of PH in infants, limited PK studies have been performed to inform its dosing. This may be due in part to the general challenges associated with performing clinical trials in infants and special population of interest. One way to overcome these challenges is the use of opportunistic study designs that can provide valuable information from standard medical care procedures. Such opportunistic clinical trial designs have been successfully implemented to evaluate the PK of several drugs in full-term and premature infants.15–18 Our use of an opportunistic clinical trial design allowed us to gain a better understanding of sildenafil disposition in infants being treated for PH.
In summary, our observed concentrations of sildenafil and DMS were within the previously reported concentration ranges in older children.14 Although echocardiography observations have suggested that sildenafil treatment leads to a therapeutic benefit, it is unclear whether this is the natural course of the disease or whether sildenafil was actually beneficial. Our findings suggest that caution may be warranted in infants receiving CYP-related concomitant medications with sildenafil for treatment of PH. Further PK, safety, and efficacy studies are needed to optimize the dose and indication for sildenafil in premature infants with PH.
Acknowledgments
Funding source: Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health (5 T32 GM086330-04). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
D.G. receives research support through 1K23HD083465-01 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), and from the nonprofit organization Thrasher Research Fund (www.thrasherresearch.org). M.C.-W. receives support for research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (1R01-HD076676-01A1), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH (UL1TR001117), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201500006I and HHSN272201300017I), the NICHD (HHSN275201000003I), the Food and Drug Administration (1U01FD004858-01), the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (HHSO100201300009C), the nonprofit organization Thrasher Research Fund (www.thrasherresearch.org), and from industry (CardioDx and Durata Therapeutics) for drug development in adults and children (www.dcri.duke.edu/research/coi.jsp). M.M.L. receives support from the U.S. government for work in neonatal clinical pharmacology (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: R34 HL124038: PI, Laughon; Pediatric Trials Network: Government Contract HHSN267200700051C, PI: Benjamin; and NICHD: 1K23HL092225, PI: Laughon); as the satellite site PI for the NICHD Neonatal Research Network (5U10HD040492, PI: Cotten); and from industry for drug development or member of data safety monitoring boards (Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, MediPost).
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Pauvert O, Lugnier C, Keravis T, Marthan R, Rousseau E, Savineau JP. Effect of sildenafil on cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase activity, vascular tone and calcium signaling in rat pulmonary artery. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;139:513–522. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barnett CF, Machado RF. Sildenafil in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2:411–422. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.4.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Teixeira-Mendonça C, Henriques-Coelho T. Pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension in newborns: therapeutic indications. Rev Port Cardiol. 2013;32:1005–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2013.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Walsh-Sukys MC, Tyson JE, Wright LL, Bauer CR, Korones SB, Stevenson DK, et al. Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in the era before nitric oxide: practice variation and outcomes. Pediatrics. 2000;105:14–20. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Steinhorn RH, Kinsella JP, Pierce C, Butrous G, Dilleen M, Oakes M, et al. Intravenous sildenafil in the treatment of neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension. J Pediatr. 2009;155:841–847.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hsieh EM, Hornik CP, Clark RH, Laughon MM, Benjamin DK, Jr, Smith PB. Medication use in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31:811–821. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1361933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Walker DK, Ackland MJ, James GC, Muirhead GJ, Rance DJ, Wastall P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of sildenafil in mouse, rat, rabbit, dog and man. Xenobiotica. 1999;29:297–310. doi: 10.1080/004982599238687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nichols DJ, Muirhead GJ, Harness JA. Pharmacokinetics of sildenafil after single oral doses in healthy male subjects: absolute bioavailability, food effects and dose proportionality. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53 Suppl 1:5S–12S. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.00027.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yaseen H, Darwich M, Hamdy H. Is sildenafil an effective therapy in the management of persistent pulmonary hypertension? J Clin Neonatol. 2012;1:171–175. doi: 10.4103/2249-4847.105958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Boolell M, Allen MJ, Ballard SA, Gepi-Attee S, Muirhead GJ, Naylor AM, et al. Sildenafil: an orally active type 5 cyclic GMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor for the treatment of penile erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1996;8:47–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Warrington JS, Shader RI, von Moltke LL, Greenblatt DJ. In vitro biotransformation of sildenafil (Viagra): identification of human cytochromes and potential drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos. 2000;28:392–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hyland R, Roe EG, Jones BC, Smith DA. Identification of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the N-demethylation of sildenafil. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51:239–248. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.00318.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mukherjee A, Dombi T, Wittke B, Lalonde R. Population pharmacokinetics of sildenafil in term neonates: evidence of rapid maturation of metabolic clearance in the early postnatal period. 2009 doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ahsman MJ, Witjes BC, Wildschut ED, Sluiter I, Vulto AG, Tibboel D, et al. Sildenafil exposure in neonates with pulmonary hypertension after administration via a nasogastric tube. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95:F109–F114. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.168336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Ouellet D, Smith PB, James LP, Ross A, Sullivan JE, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of metronidazole evaluated using scavenged samples from preterm infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:1828–1837. doi: 10.1128/AAC.06071-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Benjamin DK, Jr, Ross A, James LP, Sullivan JE, Walsh MC, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin using scavenged samples from preterm infants. Ther Drug Monit. 2012;34:312–319. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3182587665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wade KC, Wu D, Kaufman DA, Ward RM, Benjamin DK, Jr, Sullivan JE, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in young infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:4043–4049. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00569-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gonzalez D, Melloni C, Yogev R, Poindexter BB, Mendley SR, Delmore P, et al. Use of opportunistic clinical data and a population pharmacokinetic model to support dosing of clindamycin for premature infants to adolescents. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96:429–437. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2014.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Singh TP, Rohit M, Grover A, Malhotra S, Vijayvergiya R. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study to evaluate the efficacy of oral sildenafil therapy in severe pulmonary artery hypertension. Am Heart J. 2006;151:851.e1–851.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Collard HR, Anstrom KJ, Schwarz MI, Zisman DA. Sildenafil improves walk distance in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2007;131:897–899. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trottier-Boucher MN, Lapointe A, Malo J, Fournier A, Raboisson MJ, Martin B, et al. Sildenafil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015;36:1255–1260. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1154-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koukouritaki SB, Manro JR, Marsh SA, Stevens JC, Rettie AE, McCarver DG, et al. Developmental expression of human hepatic CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;308:965–974. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.060137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Treluyer JM, Gueret G, Cheron G, Sonnier M, Cresteil T. Developmental expression of CYP2C and CYP2C-dependent activities in the human liver: in-vivo/in-vitro correlation and inducibility. Pharmacogenetics. 1997;7:441–452. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199712000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lacroix D, Sonnier M, Moncion A, Cheron G, Cresteil T. Expression of CYP3A in the human liver—evidence that the shift between CYP3A7 and CYP3A4 occurs immediately after birth. Eur J Biochem. 1997;247:625–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00625.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]