Abstract
Background
The epidemiologic evidence for an association of Trichomonas vaginalis (Tv) with overall prostate cancer is mixed, but some studies suggest Tv may increase risk of more agressive disease. The aim of this study was to assess whether Tv serostatus is associated with advanced or fatal prostate cancer.
Methods
146 men with advanced (metastatic or fatal) prostate cancer and 181 age-matched controls were selected from two prior population-based, case-control studies. Tv serostatus was determined with the same laboratory methods used in previous epidemiologic studies. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression to compare Tv serostatus in prostate cancer cases and controls adjusted for potential confounders.
Results
The seroprevalence of Tv in controls was 23%. Tv serostatus was not associated with an increased risk of metastatic or fatal prostate cancer (ORs<1).
Conclusions
Our study does not support an increased risk of advanced or fatal prostate cancer in men seropositive for Tv.
Introduction
Trichomonas vaginalis (Tv) is a relatively common parasitic sexually transmitted infection. The majority of infections are non-symptomatic in men and remain undiagnosed and untreated, which has been hypothesized to result in chronic persistent prostatic infection1. Cell line studies found that Tv provokes an inflammatory response in prostate epithelial cells,1 and a Tv secreted macrophage inhibitory factor increased prostate cell proliferation and invasiveness and induced cellular pathways linked to inflammation2. As such, persistent Tv infection in the prostate may result in a tumor promoting pro-inflammatory microenvironment. The epidemiologic evidence for an association of Tv and prostate cancer (PCa) is mixed, but possibly suggestive of an association with advanced PCa3-5. The aim of this study was to assess whether Tv serosatatus is associated with an increased risk of advanced or fatal PCa.
Materials and Methods
PCa cases and controls were selected from participants enrolled in prior population-based case-control studies previously described6,7. We included 146 men with advanced (metastatic or fatal) PCa and 181 age-matched controls. Given alpha=0.05 and 23% Tv seroprevalence in controls, our study had 80% power to detect an OR of approximately 2.0, which is within the range of risk estimates reported by prior studies. Blood samples were collected during an in-person interview, kept on ice, processed within 4-6 hours using standard protocols, and stored at −80°C. The median time from PCa diagnosis to blood draw was nine months.
Tv serostatus was determined as in previous epidemiologic studies3-5 in the Alderete laboratory8. Cases and controls were plated randomly across ten plates and laboratory technicians were blinded to case-control status. The serostatus concordance of ten blinded quality control duplicate samples was 90%, and concordance of two blinded technical replicates on each of the ten plates was 80% and 70%; these measures are comparable to those in other published studies3-5.
Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using logistic regression to compare Tv serostatus in PCa cases and controls, adjusted for age at reference date, study, race (African American, Caucasian), PCa screening history in the 5 years prior (digital rectal exam, PSA test), and smoking status (current, former, never).
Results
Table 1 describes study population characteristics by Tv serostatus in controls and by disease status. The mean age at PCa diagnosis was 58.8 years. The prevalence of Tv seropositivity was 23% in controls. Tv seropositive controls were less likely to have a PCa screening history and more likely to be smokers and African American. Cases were less likely to have a screening history and more likely to be smokers, African American, and have family history of PCa. We did not observe increased risk estimates for advanced or fatal PCa in Tv seropositive men (Table 2). In fact, the point estimates were in the protective direction; seropositive men had a non-statistically significant decreased risk of fatal PCa (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.30-1.08) and a statistically significant decreased risk of advanced PCa (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28-0.93) in the fully-adjusted models. These results were attenuated when we restricted the analysis to Caucasian men. There were not enough African American men for a subgroup analysis (16 cases and 14 controls).
Table 1.
Controls only | Cases vs. controls | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tv negative (n=139) | Tv positive (n=42) | Cases (n=146) | Controls (n=181) | |
Characteristics | ||||
Age at reference date* (years), mean (std) | 58.8 (7.4) | 59.6 (6.5) | 58.8 (7.4) | 59.0 (7.2) |
Family history of prostate cancer, % | 11 | 10 | 14 | 11 |
Race, % | ||||
Caucasian | 94 | 86 | 89 | 92 |
African American | 6 | 14 | 11 | 8 |
Prostate cancer screening history#, % | ||||
Yes | 90 | 83 | 77 | 88 |
Number of lifetime female sexual partners^, % | ||||
1 | 28 | 26 | 18 | 28 |
2 to 4 | 23 | 21 | 27 | 22 |
5 to 14 | 25 | 29 | 30 | 26 |
≥15 | 25 | 24 | 26 | 24 |
Smoking status, % | ||||
Current | 13 | 19 | 19 | 14 |
Former | 41 | 48 | 49 | 43 |
Never | 46 | 33 | 32 | 43 |
BMI (kg/m2), mean (std) | 27.1 (3.7) | 27.2 (3.8) | 27.1 (4.1) | 27.1 (3.7) |
Date of diagnosis for cases and similar assigned date for controls
Digital rectal exam or PSA test within 5 years before reference date
<4% of men reported any male sexual partners
Table 2.
T. vaginalis status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Seronegative | Seropositive | |||
Advanced prostate cancer* | ||||
cases/controls (n) | 122/139 | 24/42 | ||
Model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | --- | 0.60 (0.34-1.06) | 0.08 |
Model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | --- | 0.51 (0.28-0.93) | 0.03 |
Fatal prostate cancer | ||||
cases/controls (n) | 89/139 | 20/42 | ||
Model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | --- | 0.69 (0.38-1.27) | 0.23 |
Model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | --- | 0.57 (0.30-1.08) | 0.09 |
Caucasian men only**
| ||||
Advanced prostate cancer* | ||||
cases/controls (n) | 109/131 | 21/36 | ||
Model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | --- | 0.65 (0.36-1.20) | 0.17 |
Model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | --- | 0.60 (0.32-1.13) | 0.11 |
Fatal prostate cancer | ||||
cases/controls (n) | 78/131 | 17/36 | ||
Model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | --- | 0.75 (0.39-1.44) | 0.39 |
Model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | --- | 0.68 (0.35-1.34) | 0.27 |
Model 1: Adjusted for age and study
Model 2: Model 1 + race, prostate cancer screening history, and smoking status
Advanced prostate cancer includes men with metastases and fatal prostate cancer
Models not adjusted for race
Discussion
To date, three published epidemiologic studies have investigated Tv and PCa risk using plasma antibodies to define infection history status. One study found no association for early-stage disease5 and two found an increased risk of PCa, especially more aggressive disease3,4. Only one study assessed metastatic and fatal PCa (n=139) and found an increased risk in seropositive men3. In our population-based study, we did not observe an increased risk of metastatic and fatal prostate cancer (n=146) among seropositive men. Moreover, the point estimates of risk suggest an inverse association. Similarly, Sutcliffe et al.5 did not find an increased risk of PCa in relation to Tv seropositivity, and the risk estimate for high-grade cancer was in the inverse direction; that study did not assess advanced stage or fatal PCa.
One difference in the design of our study compared to those previously published is that our samples were collected after diagnosis. Although a possibility, reverse causation is unlikely to completely explain our findings as there is no direct evidence that PCa or its treatment would result in lower detection of Tv antibodies. Moreover, a previous study found a stronger positive association of Tv with advanced PCa in men whose blood was collected closer to diagnosis3. Residual confounding by unhealthy behaviors (e.g. smoking) is also unlikely to explain our results as we would expect the bias to go in the opposite direction of our observed findings. Finally, misclassification of serostatus is likely to be nondifferential with respect to case control status and could bias our results towards the null. In conclusion, our study results do not support a positive association between Tv and advanced or fatal PCa.
Acknowledgments
Grant Support: This work was supported by NIH grants R01 CA056678, R01 CA092579, and P50 CA097186, with additional support from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. JRR is supported by a Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award.
Footnotes
Conflict of interests: None
References
- 1.Sutcliffe S, Neace C, Magnuson NS, et al. Trichomonosis, a common curable STI, and prostate carcinogenesis--a proposed molecular mechanism. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002801. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Twu O, Dessi D, Vu A, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis homolog of macrophage migration inhibitory factor induces prostate cell growth, invasiveness, and inflammatory responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:8179–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321884111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stark JR, Judson G, Alderete JF, et al. Prospective study of Trichomonas vaginalis infection and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: Physicians' Health Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1406–11. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sutcliffe S, Giovannucci E, Alderete JF, et al. Plasma antibodies against Trichomonas vaginalis and subsequent risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:939–45. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sutcliffe S, Alderete JF, Till C, et al. Trichomonosis and subsequent risk of prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:2082–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stanford JL, Wicklund KG, McKnight B, et al. Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 1999;8:881–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Agalliu I, Salinas CA, Hansten PD, et al. Statin use and risk of prostate cancer: results from a population-based epidemiologic study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:250–60. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Neace CJ, Alderete JF. Epitopes of the highly immunogenic Trichomonas vaginalis alpha-actinin are serodiagnostic targets for both women and men. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2483–90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00582-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]