Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2016 Aug 29;7:1305. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01305

An ATL78-Like RING-H2 Finger Protein Confers Abiotic Stress Tolerance through Interacting with RAV2 and CSN5B in Tomato

Jianwen Song 1,2, Yali Xing 1,2, Shoaib Munir 1,2, Chuying Yu 1,2, Lulu Song 1,2, Hanxia Li 1,2, Taotao Wang 2,*, Zhibiao Ye 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC5002894  PMID: 27621744

Abstract

RING finger proteins play an important role in plant adaptation to abiotic stresses. In the present study, a wild tomato (Solanum habrochaites) cold-induced RING-H2 finger gene, ShATL78L, was isolated, which has been identified as an abiotic stress responsive gene in tomato. The results showed that ShATL78L was constitutively expressed in various tissues such as root, leaf, petiole, stem, flower, and fruit. Cold stress up-regulated ShATL78L in the cold-tolerant S. habrochaites compared to the susceptible cultivated tomato (S. lycopersicum). Furthermore, ShATL78L expression was also regulated under different stresses such as drought, salt, heat, wound, osmotic stress, and exogenous hormones. Functional characterization showed that cultivated tomato overexpressing ShATL78L had improved tolerance to cold, drought and oxidative stresses compared to the wild-type and the knockdown lines. To understand the underlying molecular mechanism of ShATL78L regulating abiotic stress responses, we performed yeast one-hybrid and two-hybrid assays and found that RAV2 could bind to the promoter of ShATL78L and activates/alters its transcription, and CSN5B could interact with ShATL78L to regulate abiotic stress responses. Taken together, these results show that ShATL78L plays an important role in regulating plant adaptation to abiotic stresses through bound by RAV2 and interacting with CSN5B.

Highlight: RAV2 binds to the promoter of ShATL78L to activates/alters its transcription to adapt the environmental conditions; furthermore, ShATL78L interacts with CSN5B to regulate the stress tolerance.

Keywords: abiotic stress, ATL78L, COP9, CSN5B, RAV2, tomato

Introduction

Plants are often exposed to a variety of abiotic stresses such as drought, temperature extreme, salinity, and hypoxia. These unfavorable environmental conditions negatively affect the plant growth, development, and productivity. Nevertheless, plants have evolved a series of intricate mechanisms and regulatory networks to respond and adapt to unfavorable environmental conditions. In recent years, more and more stress responsive genes have been identified using forward or reverse genetic approaches (Liu et al., 2012; Catala et al., 2014; Ding et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2015). It is noteworthy that transcription factors play an important role in stress tolerance (Chinnusamy et al., 2007). For instance, the R2R3-MYB transcription factor MYB15 negatively regulates the expression of CBFs and accelerates the freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis (Agarwal et al., 2006). The cotton WRKY transcription factor GhWRKY17 responds to drought and salt stresses through ABA signaling and regulates the cellular ROS production in plants (Yan et al., 2014). Arabidopsis transcription factor NAC016 triggers drought stress responses by repressing AREB1 transcription through a trifurcate feed-forward regulatory loop involving NAP (Sakuraba et al., 2015). In addition, RING finger proteins also play important role in plant stress responses. The RING finger ubiquitin E3 ligase SDIR1 targets SDIR1-INTERACTING PROTEIN1 to modulate the salt stress response and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis (Zhang et al., 2015). Another RING finger E3 ligase, STRF1, is a membrane trafficking-related ubiquitin ligase, which helps the plants to respond to salt stress by monitoring intracellular membrane trafficking and ROS production (Tian et al., 2015).

RING finger proteins are a special type of zinc finger proteins, which consist of 40–60 residues that binds two zinc atoms (Freemont, 1993). The RING finger domain appears to be a convenient scaffold that can be altered to provide functional specificity and the RING finger motif is defined as Cys-X2-Cys-X(9–39)-Cys-X(1–3)-His-X(2–3)-Cys/His-X2-Cys-X(4–48)-Cys-X2-Cys, where X is any amino acid (Borden and Freemont, 1996). Functional studies of the RING finger proteins revealed their wide range of roles in various biological processes including viral replication, signal transduction, and development (Tian et al., 2015). In contrast to two canonical RING types (C3H2C3 or C3HC4), additional types of modified RING domains including RING-V, RING-D, RING-S/T, RING-G, and RING-C2, were identified in Arabidopsis (Stone et al., 2005). In plants, different histidine/cysteine patterns correspond differently to C3H2C3 (RING-H2) and C3HC4 (RING-HC) RING-finger types. The consensus sequence of RING-H2 finger can be described as Cys-X2-Cys-X(9–39)-Cys-X(1–3)-His-X(2–3)-His-X2-Cys-X(4–48)-Cys-X2-Cys, whereas the C3HC4-type finger is defined as Cys-X2-Cys-X(9–39)-Cys-X(1–3)-His-X(2–3)-Cys-X2-Cys-X(4–48)-Cys-X2-Cys (Borden and Freemont, 1996).

In recent years, a large number of RING finger proteins have been identified in different plant species. For example, 688 RING domains in 663 predicted proteins and nine RING types were identified in apple (Li Y. et al., 2011). 187 ANK C3HC4-type RING finger proteins were identified from 29 plant species (Yuan et al., 2013). Meanwhile, more and more RING finger proteins have been reported to be involved in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. A C3HC4 RING finger E3 ligase OsDIS1 negatively regulates the drought response through transcriptional regulation of different stress-related genes and possibly through posttranslational regulation of OsNek6 in rice (Ning et al., 2011). A C3HC4-type RING finger protein, EIRP1 E3 ligase positively regulates disease resistance in plants by mediating proteolysis of the negative regulator VpWRKY11 through degradation by 26S proteasome (Yu et al., 2013). The RING-type E3 ligase CaAIR1 plays a role in regulating ABA signaling and drought stress response in pepper (Park et al., 2015). Furthermore, RING-H2 finger proteins also play an important role in stress tolerance. Upregulation of an Arabidopsis RING-H2 gene, XERICO, confers drought tolerance through increased ABA biosynthesis (Ko et al., 2006). The RING-H2 finger E3 ubiquitin ligase, OsRFPH2-10, is involved in antiviral defense at early stages of rice dwarf virus infection (Liu et al., 2014).

In our previous microarray analysis of transcriptome differences between the cold tolerant (Solanum habrochaites LA1777 and its introgression line LA3969 under the genetic background of LA4024) and the sensitive (S. lycopersicum LA4024) genotypes under cold stress, a RING-H2 finger gene, ATL78L, was found to be more strongly induced in the two tolerant genotypes than in the sensitive one (Liu et al., 2012). However, little is known about the role of this gene in response to abiotic stresses in tomato. Moreover, the mechanism of drought and cold tolerance in tomato needs to be further investigated. In this study, we isolated the S. habrochaites RING-H2 finger gene, ShATL78L, and overexpressed this gene in S. lycopersicum cv. Ailsa Craig. The overexpression transgenic plants significantly improved drought and cold tolerance. Furthermore, we found that RAV2 can directly bind the promoter of ShATL78L and regulate its expression, and ShATL78L can interact with CSN5B to regulate abiotic stress responses in tomato. Our study provides new insights into the regulatory pathways involving ShATL78L in plant responses to various abiotic stresses.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Seedlings of tomato wild relative (S. habrochaites) LA1777 were grown under a natural light in a greenhouse with temperature regimes of 24–28°C and relative humidity of approximately 70–80%. Roots, stems, leaves, flowers and fruits were collected from these plants for RNA isolation.

T2 generation of overexpression lines (OE7, OE8, OE9) and RNA interference (RNAi) line (Ri3), as well as the wild-type (S. lycopersicum cv. Ailsa Craig, AC), were tested for their tolerance to abiotic stresses. The abiotic stress treatments were imposed in the greenhouse. Seedlings were grown at 24–28°C and relative humidity of 70–80% of natural light. Four-week-old seedlings were used for stress tolerance assays.

Abiotic Stress and Hormone Treatments

The cold tolerant S. habrochaites LA1777 was used for the analysis of ATL78L expression. Four-week-old seedlings were transferred to a growth chamber at 25 ± 2°C and relative humidity of 70% with a photoperiod of 14 h light/10 h dark and 200 μmol m-2s-1light intensity. After 3 days, seedlings were used for abiotic stress and hormonal treatments, viz., drought, cold, salt, heat, wound, polyethylene glycol6000 (PEG6000), mannitol, MV, ETH, SA and IAA. For drought stress, seedlings of LA1777 were washed with tap water thoroughly to obliterate substrates, and then dehydrated on filter papers. Cold stress treatment was performed by transferring seedlings of LA1777 to a growth chamber at 4°C under the same light condition as described above. For salinity treatment, seedlings of LA1777 were irrigated once with 200 mM NaCl solution (200 mL per pot). For heat treatment, seedlings were subjected to a high temperature of 40°C. For wound treatment, the leaves of the seedlings were pricked once with a needle. For hormone treatments, the seedling leaves were sprayed once with either 30% PEG6000, 200 mM mannitol, 0.2 mM ETH, 0.1 mM SA, or 0.1 mM IAA. One hundred milliliters of hormone solution was used for three plants. The third fully expanded leaves from the growing point were collected at indicated time points after treatments. Samples were collected for RNA isolation.

Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis

The multiple sequence alignments were conducted using MUSCLE1. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method with the units of the number of amino acid substitutions per site. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGA6 (Tamura et al., 2013). The sequences of the proteins were downloaded from EnsemblPlants2.

Cloning and Analysis of ShATL78L

The full-length cDNA, gDNA and promoter sequences of ATL78L were obtained from The Sol Genomics Network3, and the gene identifier of ATL78L is Solyc11g005280. The primer sequences used in this study were listed in Supplementary Table S1. The homologous protein sequences of ShATL78-like were found from the NCBI4 and aligned using the DNAman software 5.2.2 (LynnonBiosoft). The PLACE database (Higo et al., 1999) was used to identify potential motifs in the ShATL78L promoter sequence.

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). To remove genomic DNA contamination, the RNA was treated with DNase I at 37°C for 30 min. First strand cDNA was synthesized using the HiScript II 1st cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

The expression of ATL78L under various treatments and in transgenic lines was analyzed using qRT-PCR, which was performed using SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM (TaKaRa, China) and the LightCycler480 System (Roche, Switzerland) according to the supplier’s protocol. The PCR program was as follows: 95°C for 30 s; 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 25 s. Tomato actin was used as the internal control. All qPCR primers were designed by Primer5 and the primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The qRT-PCR data of each gene were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). qRT-PCR analysis was carried out with three technical replicates.

Generation and Molecular Analysis of Transgenic Tomato Plants

The full-length open reading frame (ORF) of ShATL78L was amplified from the cDNA of LA1777 using the primers of ATL78L (Supplementary Table S1) designed according to the S. lycopersicum full-length cDNA. For ATL78L overexpression construct, the ORF of ATL78L was incorporated into the pDONR221 vector using the Clonase BP reaction (Invitrogen), and then the recombinant plasmid was incorporated into the pMV3 vector (modified from pHELLSGATE2) by the Clonase LR reaction (Invitrogen). For RNAi construct, a 135-bp fragment of ATL78L was amplified by ATL78L-Ri primers (Supplementary Table S1), and then incorporated into the pHGRV vector using the Clonase BP reaction (Invitrogen). All the expression vector constructs were transformed into Agrobacterium strain C58 by electroporation. Cotyledons of S. lycopersicum were used for transformation, as described previously (Ouyang et al., 2005).

Tomato T0 generation was checked by PCR using CaMV 35S promoter primer and ATL78L specific reverse primer (Supplementary Table S1). The expression of ATL78L in transgenic lines was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Three independent homozygous overexpression lines (OE7, OE8, and OE9) and one RNAi line Ri3 of ShATL78L were selected for further analyses.

Abiotic Stress Tolerance Assays

For cold stress tolerance experiments, 4-week-old uniform-sized seedlings of T2 transgenic lines OE7, OE8, OE9, Ri3 and the wild-type (AC) were randomly chosen and grown in growth chamber with conditions of 4°C, 70% relative humidity and a 14 hr light/8 hr dark photoperiod (200 μmol m-2s-1 light intensity). The same conditions except at 25°C were used for control seedlings. After 7 days of cold treatments and 1 day of recovery, the third fully expanded leaves from the top were sampled.

For drought stress tolerance experiments, seedlings from the same stage of T2 transgenic lines (OE7, OE8, OE9, Ri3) and wild-type (AC) were placed in a greenhouse at 25°C under natural light conditions. Seedlings with drought treatment were withheld from water for 8 days, while the control seedlings were watered every 2 days. After 8 days of treatments, the third fully expanded leaves from the top of the plants were collected.

For salt and oxidative stress treatments, 4-week-old seedling of T2 transgenic lines OE7, OE8, OE9, Ri3 and wild-type AC were placed in a greenhouse at 25°C under natural light conditions, and the third fully expanded leaves from the top of the plants were collected. Fifteen leaf disks (0.8 cm) were detached from the third fully expanded leaves of each line and incubated in different concentrations of 15 ml solution with 0 mM NaCl, 100 mM NaCl and 5 μM MV for 72 h at 25°C, 70% relative humidity and a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod (200 μmol m-2s-1 light intensity) conditions before the Chl contents were measured.

Measurements of Water Loss

For the water loss assay, the third fully expanded leaves from the top of the control and stressed plants were detached and used for relative dehydration rate determination. The leaves were placed on a filter paper with conditions of 25°C and 60% relative humidity and weighed after 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 18 h. Ten compound leaves of each line were weighed. The relative drainage was calculated according to the formula: the relative drainage (%) = 100 × (W0 - Wt)/W0, where W0 and Wt are weights after 0 h and t h, respectively.

Protein Interaction Assay Using the Yeast Two-Hybrid System

The ORF of ShATL78L was amplified using specific primers ATL78L-BD (Supplementary Table S1) containing NdeI/PstI restriction sites, thus corresponding to the yeast expression vector pGBKT7 (Clontech, USA), to construct pGBKT7-ShATL78L. The pGADT7-CSN5B was combined by the homologous recombination method (ClonExpressTM II One Step Cloning Kit, Vazyme, China). According to the manufacturer’s protocol, the plasmids of pGBKT7-ShATL78L+pGADT7-CSN5B, pGBKT7-Lam+pGADT7-RecT (negative control), and pGBKT7-53+pGADT7-RecT (positive control) were co-transformed into yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain AH109. The positive and negative controls were provided with the BD Matchmaker library construction and screening kits (Clontech, USA). The transformants were tested on the SD/-Leu/-Trp and the SD/-Ade/-His/-Leu/-Trp media. CSN5B accession numbers in the SGN database are Solyc06g073150 and Solyc11g017300.

Binding Assay Using the Yeast One-Hybrid System

For the yeast one-hybrid assay, the promoter segments of ShATL78L were PCR amplified using the primers ATL78L-P (Supplementary Table S1) containing EcoRI/MluI restriction sites, so that the segments could be inserted into pHIS2 (Clontech, USA). Same as pGADT7-CSN5B, pGADT7-RAV2 was also combined by homologous recombination. Plasmids pHIS2-ATL78LP+pGADT7-RAV2, p53HIS2+pGAD-Rec2-53 (positive control) and pHIS2-ATL78LP+pGADT7 (negative control) were co-transferred into yeast strain Y187, and the binding was detected on SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His selective plates containing 90 mM 3-AT (3-amino-1,2,4,-triazole) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. SlRAV2 accession number in the SGN database is Solyc05g009790.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis was carried out using SigmaPlot 10, Excel, and SPSS. A significant difference between pairs of groups was analyzed by Student’s t-test.

Results

Sequence Analysis of ShATL78L Isolated from S. habrochaites

In our previous study, transcriptome profiles of cold tolerant (S. habrochaites LA1777 and its introgression line LA3969 under the genetic background of LA4024) and sensitive (S. lycopersicum LA4024) tomato genotypes were compared using microarray analysis, and one RING finger gene, ATL78L, was found to be more strongly induced by cold stress in the two tolerant genotypes than in the sensitive one (Liu et al., 2012). The complete ORFs of ATL78L were isolated from tomato Ailsa Craig (S. lycopersicum) and wild species LA1777 (S. habrochaites), as well as the wild species LA0716 (S. pennellii) that displays extremely high stress tolerance (Rick and Tanksley, 1981). The ORFs of ShATL78L and SpATL78L had the same size, consisting of 624 nucleotides and encoding 207 amino acid residues. Multiple alignments of amino acid sequences revealed that these three sequences showed a high degree of similarity to each other. Three amino acids at positions 20, 111, and 185 were different and one amino acid indel was found among the three genotypes (Figure 1). These four amino acids may functionally contribute to tomato stress tolerance.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Alignment of ATL78L amino acid sequences from Solanum lycopersicum cv. Ailsa Craig, S. habrochaites LA1777 and S. pennellii LA0716. The RING-H2 finger domain is shown in gray background.

ATL78L contains a RING finger domain (Cys-X2-Cys-X(9–39)-Cys-X (1–3)-His-X (2–3)-His-X2-Cys-X(4–48)-Cys-X2-Cys) and is classified as a RING-H2 finger protein (Figure 1). Phylogenetic analysis indicated that SlATL78L had nine paralogs in the cultivated tomato (S. lycopersicum) and showed the highest homology with PGSC0003DMT400015477 from potato (S. tuberosum). The closest homologue of SlATL78L from Arabidopsis is AT1G49230.1 (ATL78) therefore, Solyc11g005280 was named as ATL78L (Supplementary Figure S1).

Differential Expression Pattern of ATL78L in Different Species of Tomato

To confirm the microarray results, expression levels of ATL78L in LA1777 and AC were examined under cold stress treatment. cDNAs of ShATL78L and SlATL78L were isolated to perform the expression analysis. As shown in Figure 2A, ShATL78L transcripts exhibited a significant increase after 3 h of cold stress treatment. However, no significant difference was observed in the relative expression level of SlATL78L between cold-treated and control plants. Therefore, there is a positive correlation between ShATL78L transcripts and cold tolerance in tomato. To further understand the role of the ShATL78L in different abiotic stresses, we investigated the expression pattern of ShATL78L in LA1777 under different abiotic stresses and hormonal treatments. As shown in Figure 2C, the transcript levels of ShATL78L were increased in response to drought, salinity, heat, wound, mannitol, PEG, ETH, SA, and IAA treatments. ShATL78L was strongly induced by drought, mannitol, salinity, heat, wound, and IAA treatments. A statistically similar but lower induction level was detected in response to SA, ETH, and PEG. To investigate whether the expression of ShATL78L has any tissue/organ specificity, the expression level of ShATL78L in different tissues of LA1777 was determined by qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure 2B, ShATL78L was constitutively expressed in all examined tissues with a little lower expression levels in young leaves and stem epidermis compared with other tissues.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Expression patterns of tomato ATL78L in different tissues or under various abiotic stresses and hormonal treatments. (A) Expression levels of ATL78L in Solanum habrochaites LA1777 and Solanum lycopersicum cv. Ailsa Craig under cold stress. Asterisks indicate significant differences between LA1777 and AC (∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01, Student’s t-test). (B) Expression pattern of ShATL78L in different tissues of LA1777 plants. (C) Expression patterns of ShATL78L in LA1777 seedlings under drought, salt, heat, wound, mannitol, PEG, ETH, SA, and IAA treatments. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01, Student’s t-test) compared with the corresponding controls. Four-week-old seedlings were treated by 4°C, 200 mM NaCl, 40°C, 200 mM mannitol, 30% PEG6000, 0.2 mM ETH, 0.1 mM SA or 0.1 mM IAA, respectively, for indicated time points. Values are means ± SE of three biological replicates. Each replicated sample consists of leaves from three seedlings.

Molecular Characterization of ShATL78L Transgenic Plants

In order to characterize the function of ShATL78L, the full-length ORF of ShATL78L was cloned into the plant expression vector pMV3 under the control of CaMV35S promoter. This construct was introduced into AC (S. lycopersicum). A total of 28 independent transformants (T0) were generated, and 23 of them were positive as confirmed by PCR analysis using CaMV35S forward and gene-specific reverse primer sets. At the same time, the RNAi lines were also generated through knocking down the ATL78L transcripts. Transgene expression level was examined by qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure 3B, four independent lines, OE-7, OE-8, OE-9, and Ri-3 displayed expected expression levels of ATL78L.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Overexpression of ShATL78L enhanced the tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in tomato. (A) Phenotypes of seedlings from transgenic and wild-type tomato plants under cold stress conditions. Four-week-old seedlings of transgenic lines (T2 generation) and wild-type were treated at 4°C for 7 days and then recovered at 25°C for 1 day. (B) Relative expression level of ATL78L in the wild-type and transgenic lines. (C) Phenotypes of seedlings from transgenic lines and wild-type under drought stress conditions. Four-week-old seedlings of transgenic lines (T2 generation) and wild-type were withheld from water for 8 days. (D) Water loss of the detached leaves from wild-type and transgenic plants. (E) Leaf disks obtained from 4-week-old wild-type and transgenic seedlings were incubated in different solution of H2O, 100 mM NaCl and 5 μM MV for 72 h. (F) Relative chlorophyll content after the 100 mM NaCl and 5 μM MV treatment of the leaf disks. Data in (B,D,F) are means ± SE of three biologically replicated samples. AC represents the wild-type. OE-7, OE-8, OE-9, and Ri-3 represent three independent ShATL78L overexpression lines and the RNAi line, respectively. Asterisks indicate significant differences between transgenic lines and wild-type (∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

Overexpression of ShATL78L Enhances Tomato Plant Tolerance to Cold and Drought Stresses

To characterize the functional role of ShATL78L in cold stress tolerance, 4-week-old seedlings of the four transgenic lines (T2) and the wild-type AC were examined under cold stress treatment at 4°C for 7 days, and then allowed to recover at 25°C for 1 day. After the stress treatment, seedlings of the AC line exhibited severe wilting, whereas the overexpression lines (OE-7, OE-8, OE-9) displayed much less leaf wilting symptoms, and the RNAi line Ri-3 showed higher leaf wilting symptoms compared to AC (Figure 3A). These findings demonstrated that ShATL78L plays a positive role in cold stress tolerance.

To investigate whether ShATL78L has an effect on drought stress tolerance, 4-week-old seedlings of the three overexpression lines (OE7, OE8, and OE9), the RNAi line (Ri-3) and the wild-type AC were withheld from water for eight consecutive days. After the drought stress treatment, obvious dehydration symptoms (leaf wilting) were found both in the RNAi line and wild-type plants compared to overexpression lines, which exhibited inconspicuous wilting. The stem of wild-type and RNAi seedlings bent due to loss of turgor pressure while the overexpression plants remained turgid and erect (Figure 3C). Water loss assay was conducted under the dehydration stress. The detached leaf water loss was significantly lower in the overexpression lines compared to wild-type plants while RNAi line showed the maximum water loss among all the treated lines (Figure 3D). These findings demonstrated that ShATL78L plays a positive role in drought stress tolerance.

Overexpression of ShATL78L Improves Tomato Oxidative Stress Tolerance

The potential role of ShATL78L under salt and oxidative stress was further evaluated by incubating the leaf disks of 4-week-old seedlings in 100 mM NaCl and 5 μM MV solutions, respectively. After 72 h treatment, the leaf disks of the transgenic plants were similar to that of the wild-type AC in H2O and NaCl solutions. In the MV solutions, much more severe bleaching was observed in the RNAi line than overexpression plants, and wild-type plants showed an intermediate phenotype (Figure 3E). The Chl contents further confirmed the difference of salt and oxidative damages between transgenic and wild-type AC plants (Figure 3F). Taken together, these results supported that ShATL78L plays a positive role in tolerance to oxidative stress.

Transcription Factor SlRAV2 (ABI3/VP1-Like) Specifically Binds to the Promoter of ShATL78L

The induction of ShATL78L gene under various abiotic stresses prompted us to analyze the promoter of this gene (approximately 1000 bp upstream the transcription start site). The promoter sequence was isolated from LA1777 and fused with pHIS2 to construct the bait vector (pHIS2-ATL78LP). As shown in Figure 4B, 90 mM inhibitory 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT; Sigma) was screened from 0 to 90 mM concentrations of 3-AT for the yeast one-hybrid system. Bait constructs and tomato cDNA library fusion plasmid were co-transformed into yeast strain Y187 and a positive clone of SlRAV2 was selected from 152 clones for further confirmation (Supplementary Table S2). As shown in Figure 4D, all yeast cells harboring different constructs could grow on SD/-Trp/-His/-Leu without 3-AT, which indicated that all the recombinant plasmids were introduced successfully into yeast. However, co-transformed cells with pGADT7-SlRAV2 and pHIS2-ATL78LP could grow in the presence of the 90 mM 3-AT. Moreover, the growth of transformants containing constructs but lacking SlRAV2 was completely inhibited (Figure 4E), which suggested that SlRAV2 can bind to the promoter of ATL78L in yeast.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

CSN5B interacts with ATL78L whose promoter is bound by RAV2. (A) Self-activation assay of ATL78L. The yeast cells containing pGBKT7-ShATL78L transformants were tested on SD/-Trp, SD/-His/-Trp, and SD/-Ade/-Trp media. (B) Screen the concentration of 3-AT for the yeast one-hybrid system. The yeast cells containing pHIS2-ATL78LP were examined on the SD/–Trp/-His/-Leu media with the 0 to 90 mM 3-AT, respectively. (C) ATL78L interacts with two CSN5B proteins. The yeast cell transformants containing pGBKT7-53+pGADT7-RecT (positive control), pGBKT7-Lam+pGADT7-RecT (negative control) and two pGBKT7-ShATL78L+pGADT7-CSN5B were tested on the SD/-Ade/-His/-Leu/-Trp media. (D,E) RAV2 binds to the promoter of ATL78L. Plasmids p53HIS2+pGAD-Rec2-53 (positive control), pHIS2-ATL78LP+pGADT7 (negative control) and pHIS2-ATL78LP+pGADT7-SlRAV2 (the right column) were co-transferred into yeast strain Y187, the interactions were detected on SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His with 0 mM 3-AT (D) and 90 mM 3-AT (E).

ShATL78L Interacts with CSN5B In vivo

To further investigate the molecular mechanism of the ATL78L-mediated pathway in tomato stress tolerance, a yeast two-hybrid screening was performed to identify the interacting proteins with ATL78L. As shown in Figure 4A, ATL78L does not contain self-activation due to that the yeast cells pGBKT7-ShATL78L could not grow in the SD/-His/-Trp or SD/-Ade/-Trp media while could grow in the SD/-Trp medium. In the Y2H assay, the full-length ORF of ShATL78L was used as the bait to screen a tomato cDNA Y2H library, which was constructed with the prey vector pGADT7-Rec. Two positive clones of COP9 signalosome (CSN) complex subunit CSN5B were selected from 138 clones for further analysis (Supplementary Table S3). The amino acid sequences of these two genes showed high homology (Supplementary Figure S2). As shown in Figure 4C, the yeast cells co-transformed with pGBKT7-ShATL78L and pGADT7-CSN5B could grow in the SD/-Ade/-His/-Leu/-Trp media, same as the positive control (pGBKT7-53+pGADT7-RecT). In addition, negative control transformants (pGBKT7-Lam+pGADT7-RecT) did not grow in the same media. These results indicated that ShATL78L interacts with SlCSN5B in yeast.

Discussion

RING-H2 Finger Gene ShATL78L is Regulated by ETH, SA, and IAA

RING finger family proteins have been widely reported to play an important role in abiotic and biotic stresses (Lee et al., 2001; Cheung et al., 2007; Hong et al., 2007; Qin et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2015). According to the motifs, ATL78L can be classified into RING-H2, a subgroup of RING finger proteins (Borden and Freemont, 1996). RING-H2 finger proteins are involved in different abiotic stress signaling pathways in plants (Ko et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2007). However, the functions of RING-H2 proteins in tomato remain largely unknown (Hondo et al., 2007; Qi et al., 2016). Particularly, the molecular mechanism of RING-H2 finger proteins in response to stress tolerance is still unclear. ShATL78L has not been functionally characterized, though it was screened in our previous microarray experiment under cold stress (Liu et al., 2012). In this study, we showed that ShATL78L exhibited a strong response to cold, drought, salt, heat and wound stresses (Figure 2C).

It has been well reported that RING finger proteins can modulate various plant hormone responses, such as ABA (Ko et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2007; Li H. et al., 2011), IAA (Gray et al., 2002; Xie et al., 2002), GA (Park et al., 2013), ETH (He et al., 2005), JA (Hondo et al., 2007), and SA (Cheong et al., 2009). Phytohormones play critical roles in plant adaptation to adverse environmental conditions. Cross-talk between different plant hormones and the environment results in synergistic or antagonist interactions that play a significant role in plant responses to abiotic stresses (Peleg and Blumwald, 2011). Our results indicated that ShATL78L was induced by different plant hormone treatments such as ETH, IAA, and SA (Figure 2C), which indicates that ShATL78L possibly functions as a balance regulator through mediating different signaling pathways between ETH, IAA, and SA in response to abiotic stresses.

ShATL78L Enhances Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Tomato

In this study, we demonstrated that ShATL78L overexpression plants positively contributed to enhanced cold, drought, and oxidative stress tolerance (Figures 3A,C,E). These results are consistent with previous studies in other plant species (Hirayama and Shinozaki, 2010). On the other hand, suppression of the RING E3 ubiquitin ligase AtATL78 increased the cold stress tolerance, while decreased drought stress tolerance (Kim and Kim, 2013). Arabidopsis RING-H2 gene XERICO confers drought stress tolerance through increased ABA biosynthesis (Ko et al., 2006). In S. pimpinellifolium, the RING Finger E3 Ligase SpRing is a positive regulator of salt stress signaling (Qi et al., 2016). However, ShATL78L transgenic plants did not show significantly different response to salt stress compared to the wild type (Figure 3E).

ShATL78L is Directly Regulated by RAV2

In this study, we demonstrate that RAV2 binds to the promoter of ShATL78L and activates/alters ShATL78L transcription (Figures 4D,E). The RAV transcription factor contains AP2-like and B3-like domains, which specifically bind to DNA with bipartite sequence motifs of RAV1-A (CAACA) and RAV1-B (CACCTG; Kagaya et al., 1999). The motif of RAV1-A and RAV1-B can be detected in the promoter of ShATL78L. It has been well reported that RAV2 responds to different abiotic stresses (Li C.W. et al., 2011; Fu et al., 2014; Matias-Hernandez et al., 2014; Mittal et al., 2014). The promoter of RAV2, which contains the CRT/DRE element, can be bound by the DREB transcription factors (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki, 1994; Dubouzet et al., 2003; Li C.W. et al., 2011). DREB proteins specifically bind to DRE/CRT element and activate target gene transcription in Arabidopsis (Liu et al., 1998) and tomato (Li C.W. et al., 2011; Li et al., 2012). It has been well studied that DREB family play an important role in abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis, such as DREB (Liu et al., 1998) and CBF1 (Stockinger et al., 1997). In recent years, several studies have supported that DREB family genes exhibit similar role in abiotic stresses in tomato. For example, SlDREB gene acts as a positive regulator of drought stress responses by restricting leaf expansion and internode elongation (Li et al., 2012); The dehydration-responsive transcription factor SlDREB2 mediates salt stress tolerance in tomato and Arabidopsis (Hichri et al., 2016). Tomato has a complete CBF cold responsive pathway, however, its CBF regulon differs from Arabidopsis and shows much smaller and less diverse in function (Zhang et al., 2004). Our results and these previous findings clearly indicate the responsiveness of ShATL78L to multiple abiotic stresses (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

Proposed role of ShATL78L in the plant stress signaling pathway. The model shows the genetic interactions between RAV2, ATL78L, and CSN5B genes in regulating the responses to abiotic stress in tomato.

ShATL78L Interacts with COP9 Signalosome Complex Subunit CSN5B in Response to Abiotic Stresses

COP9 (constitutive photomorphogenesis) is a component of the signaling complex mediating light control of development in Arabidopsis (Wei et al., 1994). CSN consists of eight subunits (CSN1-8), and plays a critical role in the ubiquitin/26S proteasome proteolytic regulatory pathway (Rubio et al., 2005). We show that ShATL78L interacts with CSN5B (Figure 4C), which plays a crucial role in abiotic stress tolerance (Wang et al., 2013). In rat, CSN5 inhibits cardiac L-type Ca2+ channel activity through protein–protein interactions (Kameda et al., 2006). Taken together, we hypothesize that ShATL78L responds to multiple abiotic stresses possibly through interacting with CSN5B, which alters the Ca2+ channel activity. On the other hand, CSN regulates plant growth and development through mediating protein degradation (Serino and Deng, 2003). In addition, CSN plays a vital role in mediating E3 ubiquitin ligase-mediated responses (Schwechheimer et al., 2001; Cavadini et al., 2016). Altogether, our results indicate that ShATL78L enhances multiple abiotic stresses tolerance possibly through altering the ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation (Figure 5).

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides a possible molecular mechanism of ShATL78L in enhancing multiple abiotic stress tolerance in tomato (Figure 5). Our results clearly indicate that RAV2 binds to the promoter of ShATL78L and activates/alters transcription levels of ShATL78L in helping plants to adapt unfavorable environmental conditions. Meanwhile, ShATL78L interacts with CSN5B to regulate stress tolerances. However, further studies are still required to explore the detailed mechanism of COP9-mediated stress signaling in tomato.

Author Contributions

JS designed and performed experiments, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. YX designed and conducted the qRTPCR experiments, and performed expression analysis. SM, CY, and LS designed and carried out the stress experiments. ZY, TW, and HL designed all the experiments and revised the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31572125, 31372081 and 31171960) and the China Agricultural Research System (CARS-25-A-02)

ABBREVIATIONS

3-AT

3-amino-1,2,4-triazole

ABA

abscisic acid

Chl

chlorophyll

DREB

dehydration-responsive element binding

ETH

ethephon

IAA

indole-3-acetic acid

MV

methyl viologen

PEG

polyethylene glycol

qRT-PCR

quantitative real-time PCR

SA

salicylic acid

Footnotes

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2016.01305

Click here for additional data file. (113KB, PDF)
Click here for additional data file. (19.8KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (20KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (902.3KB, PDF)
Click here for additional data file. (642KB, PDF)

References

  1. Agarwal M., Hao Y., Kapoor A., Dong C. H., Fujii H., Zheng X., et al. (2006). A R2R3 type MYB transcription factor is involved in the cold regulation of CBF genes and in acquired freezing tolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 281 37636–37645. 10.1074/jbc.M605895200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borden K. L., Freemont P. S. (1996). The RING finger domain: a recent example of a sequence-structure family. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol 6 395–401. 10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80060-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catala R., Lopez-Cobollo R., Mar Castellano M., Angosto T., Alonso J. M., Ecker J. R., et al. (2014). The Arabidopsis 14-3-3 protein RARE COLD INDUCIBLE 1A links low-temperature response and ethylene biosynthesis to regulate freezing tolerance and cold acclimation. Plant Cell 26 3326–3342. 10.1105/tpc.114.127605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavadini S., Fischer E. S., Bunker R. D., Potenza A., Lingaraju G. M., Goldie K. N., et al. (2016). Cullin–RING ubiquitin E3 ligase regulation by the COP9 signalosome. Nature 531 598–603. 10.1038/nature17416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheong M. S., Park H. C., Hong M. J., Lee J., Choi W., Jin J. B., et al. (2009). Specific domain structures control abscisic acid, salicylic acid, and stress-mediated SIZ1 phenotypes. Plant Physiol. 151 1930–1942. 10.1104/pp.109.143719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheung M. Y., Zeng N. Y., Tong S. W., Li F. W., Zhao K. J., Zhang Q., et al. (2007). Expression of a RING-HC protein from rice improves resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 58 4147–4159. 10.1093/jxb/erm272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chinnusamy V., Zhu J., Zhu J.-K. (2007). Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 12 444–451. 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ding Y., Li H., Zhang X., Xie Q., Gong Z., Yang S. (2015). OST1 kinase modulates freezing tolerance by enhancing ICE1 stability in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 32 278–289. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.12.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubouzet J. G., Sakuma Y., Ito Y., Kasuga M., Dubouzet E. G., Miura S., et al. (2003). OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought, high, salt, and cold responsive gene expression. Plant J. 33 751–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Freemont P. S. (1993). The RING finger. A novel protein sequence motif related to the zinc finger. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 684 174–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fu M., Kang H. K., Son S.-H., Kim S.-K., Nam K. H. (2014). A Subset of Arabidopsis RAV transcription factors modulates drought and salt stress responses independent of ABA. Plant Cell Physiol. 55 1892–1904. 10.1093/pcp/pcu118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gray W. M., Hellmann H., Dharmasiri S., Estelle M. (2002). Role of the Arabidopsis RING-H2 protein RBX1 in RUB modification and SCF function. Plant Cell 14 2137–2144. 10.1105/tpc.003178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. He X. J., Mu R. L., Cao W. H., Zhang Z. G., Zhang J. S., Chen S. Y. (2005). AtNAC2, a transcription factor downstream of ethylene and auxin signaling pathways, is involved in salt stress response and lateral root development. Plant J. 44 903–916. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02575.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hichri I., Muhovski Y., Clippe A., Zizkova E., Dobrev P. I., Motyka V., et al. (2016). SlDREB2, a tomato dehydration-responsive element-binding 2 transcription factor, mediates salt stress tolerance in tomato and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 39 62–79. 10.1111/pce.12591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Higo K., Ugawa Y., Iwamoto M., Korenaga T. (1999). Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 27 297–300. 10.1093/nar/27.1.297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hirayama T., Shinozaki K. (2010). Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: past, present and future. Plant J. 61 1041–1052. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04124.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hondo D., Hase S., Kanayama Y., Yoshikawa N., Takenaka S., Takahashi H. (2007). The LeATL6-associated ubiquitin/proteasome system may contribute to fungal elicitor-activated defense response via the jasmonic acid-dependent signaling pathway in tomato. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20 72–81. 10.1094/MPMI-20-0072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hong J. K., Choi H. W., Hwang I. S., Hwang B. K. (2007). Role of a novel pathogen-induced pepper C3–H–C4 type RING-finger protein gene, CaRFP1, in disease susceptibility and osmotic stress tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 63 571–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kagaya Y., Ohmiya K., Hattori T. (1999). RAV1, a novel DNA-binding protein, binds to bipartite recognition sequence through two distinct DNA-binding domains uniquely found in higher plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 27 470–478. 10.1093/nar/27.2.470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kameda K., Fukao M., Kobayashi T., Tsutsuura M., Nagashima M., Yamada Y., et al. (2006). CSN5/Jab1 inhibits cardiac L-type Ca2+ channel activity through protein–protein interactions. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 40 562–569. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim S. J., Kim W. T. (2013). Suppression of Arabidopsis RING E3 ubiquitin ligase AtATL78 increases tolerance to cold stress and decreases tolerance to drought stress. FEBS Lett. 587 2584–2590. 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.06.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ko J. H., Yang S. H., Han K. H. (2006). Upregulation of an Arabidopsis RING-H2 gene, XERICO, confers drought tolerance through increased abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant J. 47 343–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee H., Xiong L., Gong Z., Ishitani M., Stevenson B., Zhu J.-K. (2001). The Arabidopsis HOS1 gene negatively regulates cold signal transduction and encodes a RING finger protein that displays cold-regulated nucleo–cytoplasmic partitioning. Genes Dev. 15 912–924. 10.1101/gad.866801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li C. W., Su R. C., Cheng C. P., Sanjaya, You S. J., Hsieh T. H.,et al. (2011). Tomato RAV transcription factor is a pivotal modulator involved in the AP2/EREBP-mediated defense pathway. Plant Physiol. 156 213–227. 10.1104/pp.111.174268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li H., Jiang H., Bu Q., Zhao Q., Sun J., Xie Q., et al. (2011). The Arabidopsis RING finger E3 ligase RHA2b acts additively with RHA2a in regulating abscisic acid signaling and drought response. Plant Physiol. 156 550–563. 10.1104/pp.111.176214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Y., Wu B., Yu Y., Yang G., Wu C., Zheng C. (2011). Genome-wide analysis of the RING finger gene family in apple. Mol. Genet. Genomics 286 81–94. 10.1007/s00438-011-0625-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li J., Sima W., Ouyang B., Wang T., Ziaf K., Luo Z., et al. (2012). Tomato SlDREB gene restricts leaf expansion and internode elongation by downregulating key genes for gibberellin biosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 63 6407–6420. 10.1093/jxb/ers295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu H., Ouyang B., Zhang J., Wang T., Li H., Zhang Y., et al. (2012). Differential modulation of photosynthesis, signaling, and transcriptional regulation between tolerant and sensitive tomato genotypes under cold stress. PLoS ONE 7:e50785 10.1371/journal.pone.0050785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu L., Jin L., Huang X., Geng Y., Li F., Qin Q., et al. (2014). OsRFPH2-10, a ring-H2 finger E3 ubiquitin ligase, is involved in rice antiviral defense in the early stages of rice dwarf virus infection. Mol. Plant 7 1057–1060. 10.1093/mp/ssu007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu Q., Kasuga M., Sakuma Y., Abe H., Miura S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., et al. (1998). Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2 with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought-and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10 1391–1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ma Y., Dai X., Xu Y., Luo W., Zheng X., Zeng D., et al. (2015). COLD1 confers chilling tolerance in rice. Cell 160 1209–1221. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Matias-Hernandez L., Aguilar-Jaramillo A. E., Marin-Gonzalez E., Suarez-Lopez P., Pelaz S. (2014). RAV genes: regulation of floral induction and beyond. Ann. Bot. 114 1459–1470. 10.1093/aob/mcu069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mittal A., Gampala S. S., Ritchie G. L., Payton P., Burke J. J., Rock C. D. (2014). Related to ABA-Insensitive3 (ABI3)/Viviparous1 and AtABI5 transcription factor coexpression in cotton enhances drought stress adaptation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12 578–589. 10.1111/pbi.12162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ning Y., Jantasuriyarat C., Zhao Q., Zhang H., Chen S., Liu J., et al. (2011). The SINA E3 ligase OsDIS1 negatively regulates drought response in rice. Plant Physiol. 157 242–255. 10.1104/pp.111.180893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ouyang B., Chen Y. H., Li H. X., Qian C. J., Huang S. L., Ye Z. B. (2005). Transformation of tomatoes with osmotin and chitinase genes and their resistance to Fusarium wilt. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 80 517–522. 10.1080/14620316.2005.11511971 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Park C., Lim C. W., Baek W., Lee S. C. (2015). RING type E3 ligase CaAIR1 in pepper acts in the regulation of ABA signaling and drought stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 56 1808–1819. 10.1093/pcp/pcv103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Park J., Nguyen K. T., Park E., Jeon J.-S., Choi G. (2013). DELLA proteins and their interacting RING Finger proteins repress gibberellin responses by binding to the promoters of a subset of gibberellin-responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25 927–943. 10.1105/tpc.112.108951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Peleg Z., Blumwald E. (2011). Hormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14 290–295. 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Qi S., Lin Q., Zhu H., Gao F., Zhang W., Hua X. (2016). The RING finger E3 ligase SpRing is a positive regulator of salt stress signaling in salt-tolerant wild tomato species. Plant Cell Physiol. 57 528–539. 10.1093/pcp/pcw006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Qin F., Sakuma Y., Tran L.-S. P., Maruyama K., Kidokoro S., Fujita Y., et al. (2008). Arabidopsis DREB2A-interacting proteins function as RING E3 ligases and negatively regulate plant drought stress–responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 20 1693–1707. 10.1105/tpc.107.057380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rick C. M., Tanksley S. D. (1981). Genetic variation in Solanum pennelli: Comparisons with two other sympatric tomato species. Plant Syst. Evol. 139 11–45. 10.1007/BF00983920 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rubio V., Shen Y., Saijo Y., Liu Y., Gusmaroli G., Dinesh-Kumar S. P., et al. (2005). An alternative tandem affinity purification strategy applied to Arabidopsis protein complex isolation. Plant J. 41 767–778. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02328.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sakuraba Y., Kim Y. S., Han S. H., Lee B. D., Paek N. C. (2015). The Arabidopsis transcription factor NAC016 promotes drought stress responses by repressing AREB1 transcription through a trifurcate feed-forward regulatory loop involving NAP. Plant Cell 27 1771–1787. 10.1105/tpc.15.00222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Schwechheimer C., Serino G., Callis J., Crosby W. L., Lyapina S., Deshaies R. J., et al. (2001). Interactions of the COP9 signalosome with the E3 ubiquitin ligase SCFTIR1 in mediating auxin response. Science 292 1379–1382. 10.1126/science.1059776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Serino G., Deng X.-W. (2003). The COP9 signalosome: regulating plant development through the control of proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 54 165–182. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Stockinger E. J., Gilmour S. J., Thomashow M. F. (1997). Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the C-repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA regulatory element that stimulates transcription in response to low temperature and water deficit. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 1035–1040. 10.1073/pnas.94.3.1035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Stone S. L., Hauksdottir H., Troy A., Herschleb J., Kraft E., Callis J. (2005). Functional analysis of the RING-type ubiquitin ligase family of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 137 13–30. 10.1104/pp.104.052423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., Kumar S. (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30 2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tian M., Lou L., Liu L., Yu F., Zhao Q., Zhang H., et al. (2015). The RING finger E3 ligase STRF1 is involved in membrane trafficking and modulates salt-stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 82 81–92. 10.1111/tpj.12797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang J., Yu Y., Zhang Z., Quan R., Zhang H., Ma L., et al. (2013). Arabidopsis CSN5B interacts with VTC1 and modulates ascorbic acid synthesis. Plant Cell 25 625–636. 10.1105/tpc.112.106880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wei N., Chamovitz D. A., Deng X.-W. (1994). Arabidopsis COP9 is a component of a novel signaling complex mediating light control of development. Cell 78 117–124. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90578-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Xie Q., Guo H.-S., Dallman G., Fang S., Weissman A. M., Chua N.-H. (2002). SINAT5 promotes ubiquitin-related degradation of NAC1 to attenuate auxin signals. Nature 419 167–170. 10.1038/nature00998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K. (1994). A novel cis-acting element in an Arabidopsis gene is involved in responsiveness to drought, low-temperature, or high-salt stress. Plant Cell 6 251–264. 10.2307/3869643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yan H., Jia H., Chen X., Hao L., An H., Guo X. (2014). The cotton WRKY transcription factor GhWRKY17 functions in drought and salt stress in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana through ABA signaling and the modulation of reactive oxygen species production. Plant Cell Physiol. 55 2060–2076. 10.1093/pcp/pcu133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yu Y., Xu W., Wang J., Wang L., Yao W., Yang Y., et al. (2013). The Chinese wild grapevine (Vitis pseudoreticulata) E3 ubiquitin ligase Erysiphe necator-induced RING finger protein 1 (EIRP1) activates plant defense responses by inducing proteolysis of the VpWRKY11 transcription factor. New Phytol. 200 834–846. 10.1111/nph.12418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yuan X., Zhang S., Liu S., Yu M., Su H., Shu H., et al. (2013). Global analysis of ankyrin repeat domain C3HC4-type RING finger gene family in plants. PLoS ONE 8:e58003 10.1371/journal.pone.0058003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang H., Cui F., Wu Y., Lou L., Liu L., Tian M., et al. (2015). The RING finger ubiquitin E3 ligase SDIR1 targets SDIR1-INTERACTING PROTEIN1 for degradation to modulate the salt stress response and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27 214–227. 10.1105/tpc.114.134163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang X., Fowler S. G., Cheng H., Lou Y., Rhee S. Y., Stockinger E. J., et al. (2004). Freezing-sensitive tomato has a functional CBF cold response pathway, but a CBF regulon that differs from that of freezing-tolerant Arabidopsis. Plant J. 39 905–919. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02176.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhang Y., Yang C., Li Y., Zheng N., Chen H., Zhao Q., et al. (2007). SDIR1 is a RING finger E3 ligase that positively regulates stress-responsive abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19 1912–1929. 10.1105/tpc.106.048488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (113KB, PDF)
Click here for additional data file. (19.8KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (20KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (902.3KB, PDF)
Click here for additional data file. (642KB, PDF)

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES