Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Jul;53(7):987–994. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181dcb3f2

A Prospective Analysis of Clinical Variables, Serologic Factors and Outcome of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Patients with Backwash Ileitis

Evan White *, Gil Y Melmed +, Eric A Vasiliauskas +, Marla Dubinsky #, Dror Berel **, Stephan R Targan +, Phillip R Fleshner *
PMCID: PMC5002988  NIHMSID: NIHMS811546  PMID: 20551749

Abstract

Purpose

The outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with backwash ileitis (BWI) is controversial. We prospectively compared the outcome of IPAA in colitis patients with BWI (BWI+) and without BWI (BWI-neg).

Methods

Consecutive colitis patients undergoing IPAA were reviewed. All patients were classified after surgery as being either BWI+ or BWI-neg. Serum drawn preoperatively was assayed for anti-Saccharomyces-cerevisiae (ASCA), anti-outer membrane porin-C (OmpC), anti-CBir1, anti-I2, and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA) using ELISA. Outcomes included acute pouchitis (antibiotic responsive), chronic pouchitis (antibiotic dependent or refractory), or de novo Crohn's disease (small inflammation above the pouch inlet or pouch fistula).

Results

Within 334 patients were 39 patients who were BWI+ (12%). Comparing the BWI+ and BWI-neg patients, there was a higher incidence of pancolitis (100% vs 74%; p=.0001), primary sclerosing cholangitis (15% vs 2%; p=.001) and high-level (>100 ELISA units/ml) pANCA expression (29% vs 9%; p=.001). After a median followup of 26 months, 53 patients (16%) developed acute pouchitis, 37 patients (11%) developed chronic pouchitis and 40 patients (12%) developed de novo Crohn's disease (CD). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute pouchitis, chronic pouchitis or de novo CD between the BWI+ and BWI-neg patient groups.

Conclusion

There was a significantly higher incidence of pancolitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and high-level (>100 ELISA units/ml) pANCA expression in BWI+ patients versus BWI-neg patient groups. The incidence of acute pouchitis, chronic pouchitis and de novo CD after IPAA do not differ significantly between BWI+ and BWI-neg patients.

Keywords: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, backwash ileitis, serologic factors, ulcerative colitis, indeterminate colitis, inflammatory bowel disease-unclassified, pouchitis

Introduction

Abdominal colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard operative approach for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring colectomy for dysplasia, cancer or medically refractory disease. Despite excellent functional results and high patient satisfaction (1,2), pouchitis remains a significant clinical problem. For example, objective measurement tools have shown that pouchitis patients have a poorer quality of life compared to patients who have not developed pouchitis (3,4)

The mucosal inflammation observed in UC usually starts in the rectum and over time extends into more proximal colonic segments, usually in a continuous fashion. UC does not typically involve other areas of the intestinal tract, although mucosal inflammation proximal to the ileocecal valve is occasionally seen and is termed backwash ileitis (BWI) (5). The association of BWI in patients undergoing IPAA and pouchitis remains controversial. Although some studies have found higher rates of pouchitis in BWI+ patients (6-8), other papers have suggested that BWI+ patients have outcomes comparable to BWI-neg patients (9-11). These conflicting results in part arise from a number of factors, including study design, small patient numbers, suboptimal patient followup and referral center bias typical of these studies.

In this prospective study, we investigated the outcome of IPAA in a longitudinally followed cohort of consecutive UC patients with BWI operated on by a single surgeon. In addition, we examined whether any clinical or serologic factors could predict outcome in patients with BWI.

Methods

Study Population

As part of a prospective study to examine clinical, serologic and genetic markers with clinical phenotypes, UC, inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBDU) or indeterminate colitis (IC) patients requiring colectomy for medically unresponsive disease or dysplasia over the eleven-year period ending June 2008 were studied. All research related activities were approved by the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB # 3358). Complete mucosectomy was performed in all patients by one surgeon (PRF). In addition, all patients had a temporary diverting ileostomy constructed at the time of pouch creation.

Assessment of Clinical Characteristics

Detailed clinical profiles assessing demographic information and characteristics of the disease and its treatment were prospectively generated by one investigator (PRF) using chart review and patient interview. Although we practice in a tertiary referral center, all patients were closely followed by one investigator (PRF). Patients were seen for follow up examinations every three months for the first year after stoma closure and yearly afterwards. Only patients followed for minimum of 3 months were included in this analysis.

Demographic information assessed included patient age at surgery, gender and length of followup after surgery. Disease characteristics examined included disease duration, perianal disease, transmural disease, extraintestinal manifestations, family history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the diagnosis of UC, IBDU or IC. Extraintestinal manifestations noted before colectomy included primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), skin lesions (pyoderma gangrenosum, erythema nodosum), bone/joint disease (arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, sacroileitis) or eye disease (uveitis, episcleritis) considered by the investigators and the patients' physicians to be manifestations of IBD. The diagnosis of PSC was based on clinical findings and confirmed in all cases using liver biopsy. Disease duration referred to the time interval between IBD diagnosis and the date of colectomy. Treatment characteristics tabulated included the nature of medical therapy before colectomy (steroids alone vs. the use of other immunomodulators) and indications for surgery (medically-refractory disease vs. dysplasia/cancer).

Diagnosis of Backwash Ileitis

Backwash ileitis was defined as neutrophilic inflammation in the lamina propria and/or epithelium of the distal 1 to 2 cm of the terminal ileum. Features suggestive of chronic ileitis (such as pyloric metaplasia or villous architectural distortion) were not considered within the pathologic spectrum of BWI and these cases were excluded. The macroscopic or histological evidence of acute inflammation restricted to the distal 3 cm of the extreme terminal ileum was not thought to be related to Crohn's disease (CD). Patients with ulcerations isolated to the ileocecal valve were not considered to have BWI.

Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis, IBDU and Indeterminate Colitis

Clinical, endoscopic and pathologic criteria were reviewed in all patients to determine if they had UC, IBDU or IC according to the Montreal Classification (12). Clinically, UC patients had no perianal disease, and endoscopic features included continuous macroscopic disease extending varying distances from the dentate line. Radiologic evaluation revealed the distinct absence of either a colonic stricture or small-bowel disease 3 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve. Histologic patterns of continuous microscopic inflammation and the absence of noncaseating granulomas were mandatory to rule out CD. Additionally, these features were also identified after review of intraoperative findings and pathologic evaluation of the resected specimen. Patients were classified as having IBDU when they had preoperative clinical, endoscopic or pathologic criteria of UC with some features suggestive but not diagnostic of CD. Preoperative features included discontinuous inflammation possibly related to medical therapy, history of an anal fistula or ulcer which was inactive at the time of surgery, noncaseating granulomas thought to be related to crypt rupture, or small bowel inflammation not involving the terminal ileum. Patients were classified as having IC when they had postoperative clinical, endoscopic or pathologic criteria of UC with some features suggestive but not diagnostic of CD. Postoperative pathologic features of IC included gross or microscopic transmural colonic inflammation or discontinuous histopathologic involvement of the colon possible related to medical therapy, history of an anal fistula or ulcer which was inactive at the time of surgery, noncaseating granulomas thought to be related to crypt rupture, or small bowel inflammation not involving the terminal ileum. According to these criteria, all patients were classified before surgery as having either UC or IBDU. Immediately after histopathologic evaluation of the resected specimen, all patients were then reclassified as having either UC or IC. Patients with granulomatous inflammation on histopathologic examination not thought to be related to a ruptured crypt were deemed to have CD and were excluded from study analysis.

Diagnosis of Pouchitis and Crohn's Disease

Pouchitis was defined as a clinical syndrome characterized by the onset of increased stool frequency often with bloody diarrhea, pelvic discomfort, urgency, malaise, and fever. The diagnosis of pouchitis was confirmed in all cases by endoscopy with afferent ileal limb intubation. Endoscopic findings in cases of pouchitis included diffuse mucosal inflammation, typically involving the entire pouch, characterized by exudate, ulceration, erythema, and sparing of the afferent ileal segment. Histopathologic evaluation of the pouch was not routinely performed. Acute pouchitis (AP) was defined as flares treated favorably with antibiotics occurring at least four months apart during which time the patient was completely asymptomatic and had returned to his/her usual bowel pattern. Chronic pouchitis (CP) required continuous antibiotic treatment for symptom relief and also included those patients who were did not respond to antibiotic treatment. Stool studies were obtained when conventional antibiotic therapy was unsuccessful or in patients with CP. However, pouchoscopy with biopsies was performed in all CP patients looking for granulomatous inflammation or cytomegalovirus inclusion bodies (13). De novo CD after IPAA was diagnosed either when mucosal inflammation (5 or more ulcers) involved the small bowel mucosa proximal to the ileal pouch (14) anytime after surgery and/or when a pouch fistula or other perianal complication developed more than 3 months after ileostomy closure. For patients with persistent symptoms, studies were done to exclude mechanical complications of surgery such as an anal stricture or partial small bowel obstruction. Patients using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were also excluded from analysis (15). Time to diagnosis of pouchitis or de novo CD was defined as the time period from ileostomy closure.

Serologic Analysis

Serum was drawn immediately before colectomy, coded, and stored for future analysis. All sera were analyzed in a blinded fashion by Prometheus Laboratories (San Diego, California, USA) or performed at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Stored serum was analyzed for expression of IBD-associated antibodies, including ASCA, anti-OmpC, anti-CBir1, anti-I2 and pANCA in a blinded fashion by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), as previously described (16-18). All assays for anti-I2 were performed at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Antibody levels were determined and results expressed as ELISA units (EU/ml) which are relative to a Cedars-Sinai laboratory (OmpC-IgA, anti-I2, and anti-CBir1) or a Prometheus Laboratory standard (San Diego, CA; pANCA, ASCA-IgA and IgG) derived from a pool of patient sera with well-characterized disease found to have reactivity to these antigens. Qualitative positivity to any antibody was defined as being greater than cut-off values greater than 2 standard deviations above mean control titers for each assay. All assays were performed blindly without knowledge of patient clinical characteristics. Similarly, clinical course after IPAA was assessed without knowledge of the patient's serologic profile.

Our group has previously reported that patients having sera with high pANCA levels (greater than 100 ELISA units per milliliter) are predisposed to the development of chronic pouchitis but not acute pouchitis (19). These data suggest that high-level pANCA expression may identify a subset of patients with UC who may have a distinct type of mucosal inflammation representing an exquisite sensitivity to the presence of bacterial antigens. This observation stimulated our analysis of patients not only on pANCA positivity or negativity but also on the magnitude of antibody expression, namely antibody level. pANCA+ patients were thus stratified into 2 groups based on antibody level. High-level pANCA+ patients had levels equal to and above 100 ELISA units per milliliter. Low-level pANCA+ patients had levels below 100 ELISA units per milliliter

Statistical Analysis

All data were entered into a standardized database computer program (Microsoft® Excel, Seattle, Washington). For continuous covariates, medians were compared with the use of Wilcoxon nonparametric tests. Categorical variables were compared with Chi-square or Fishers' exact test (if expected cell counts were less than 5). Univariate time-to-event analysis using Cox proportional hazards modelling was separately performed for each outcome variable (acute pouchitis, chronic pouchitis, or Crohn's disease outcomes relative to those with no pouch complications) based on the presence or absence of BWI (R, The R Project for Statistical Computing). In addition, univariate time-to-event analyses were performed on each potential predictor variable for each of the 3 outcomes, with the intent to include all variables with log-rank p<0.15 into a multivariate model. All hypothesis testing was two-sided with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant (JMP 8.0 the SAS Institute, Carey, NC).

Results

Patient Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics of the 334 study patients are shown in Table I. A majority of the patients were male. Of the 281 patients with medically unresponsive disease, 47 (17%) were steroid-dependent and 234 (83%) were refractory to other immunomodulatory therapy, including thiopurines (n=205), cyclosporin (n=96) and/or infliximab (n=51). Seventy-three patients (22%) had EIMs associated with their disease, including arthritis (n=50), PSC (n=12), skin disease (n=10) or uveitis (n=1). Although the majority of patients had surgery for medically-refractory disease, IPAA was performed in 38 patients for dysplasia and 15 patients for an established carcinoma. Before surgery, 237 patients (71%) had UC and the remaining 97 patients (29%) had IBDU. The diagnosis of IBDU was based on discontinuous inflammation (n=65), anal disease (n=14), involvement of the small bowel proximal to the terminal ileum (n=9) and crypt-associated granulomas (n=9). After histologic evaluation of the resected specimen, there were a total of 236 UC patients and 98 IC patients. The diagnosis of IC was based on transmural inflammation on the colectomy specimen (n=41), discontinuous inflammation (n=21), crypt associated granulomas (n=14), involvement of the small bowel proximal to the terminal ileum (n=11), and anal disease (n=11).

Table I. Clinical Features of the Study Cohort.

Sex (M/F) 186 / 148
Median age (range) 38 (8 - 81)
Median disease duration (range) 60 months (3 - 492)
Disease extent
 Pancolitis 258
 Left-sided 73
 Proctitis 3
Preoperative medication
 Steroids alone 47
 Immunomodulators 234
Extraintestinal disease 73
 Arthritis 50
 PSC 12
 Other 11
Backwash ileitis 39
Family history of IBD 89
Perianal disease 17
Preoperative type of colitis
 Ulcerative colitis 237
 IBDU 97
Postoperative type of colitis
 Ulcerative colitis 236
 IC 98
Indication for IPAA
 Medically unresponsive 281
 Cancer / Dysplasia 53

PSC primary sclerosing cholangitis

IBD inflammatory bowel disease

IBDU inflammatory bowel disease unclassified

IC indeterminate colitis

IPAA ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Clinical Characteristics and Seromarker Expression in Backwash Ileitis

Backwash ileitis was identified in 39 (12%) patients. There were a number of significant differences in clinical characteristics between patient groups with or without BWI (Table II). All patients with BWI had pancolitis. The incidence of pancolitis was significantly higher in the BWI+ patient group versus the BWI- patient group (p=0.0001). Although there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of EIM, PSC was significantly more common in BWI+ patients compared to BWI- patients. A majority of BWI+ patients had atypical features of UC both before surgery (IBDU) and after surgery (IC). The diagnosis of IBDU in BWI+ patients was based on discontinuous inflammation (n=10), involvement of the small bowel above the terminal ileum (n=5), anal disease (n=4), and crypt-associated granulomas (n=1). The diagnosis of IC in BWI+ patients was based on involvement of the small bowel above the terminal ileum (n=8), transmural inflammation on the colectomy specimen (n=5), discontinuous inflammation (n=4), anal disease (n=4) and crypt associated granulomas (n=2). The incidence of both IBDU and IC was much higher in BWI+ patients versus BWI- patients.

Table II. Clinical Variables in Patients With and Without Backwash Ileitis.

Backwash-Positive (n=39) Backwash-Negative (n=295) p value
Sex (M/F) 20/19 166/129 0.61
Median age (range) 36 (8-67) 38 (9-81) 0.32
Median disease duration (mo) 61 60 0.58
Disease Extent
 Pancolitis 39 (100) 219 (74) 0.0001
 Left-sided 0 (0) 73 (25)
 Proctitis 0 (0) 3 (1)
Preoperative medication
 Steroids 4 (10) 42 (14) 0.80
 Immunomodulators 28 (72) 209 (71)
Extraintestinal disease 13 (33) 62 (21) 0.10
 Arthritis 5 (13) 21 (7) 0.20
 PSC 6 (15) 6 (2) 0.001*
 Other 2 (5) 35 (12) 0.28
Family history of IBD 8 (21) 82 (28) 0.44
 Ulcerative colitis 4 (10) 59 (20)
 Crohn's disease 5 (13) 29 (10)
Perianal disease 5 (13) 12 (4) 0.04
Preoperative type of colitis
 Ulcerative colitis 19 (49) 218 (74) 0.002
 IBDU 20 (51) 77 (26)
Postoperative type of colitis
 Ulcerative colitis 16 (41) 220 (75) 0.0001
 IC 23 (59) 75 (25)
Indication for IPAA
 Medically unresponsive 32 (82) 249 (84) 0.65
 Cancer / dysplasia 7 (18) 46 (16)
*

comparison of PSC between BWI+ and BWI-negative patient groups

PSC primary sclerosing cholangitis

IBD inflammatory bowel disease

IBDU inflammatory bowel disease unclassified

IC indeterminate colitis

IPAA ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

As complete serology data was not available in 7 study patients, serologic analysis was performed on the remaining 327 study patients (BWI+=38; BWI-neg=289). Serum pANCA, anti-I2, anti-OmpC, anti-CBir1 and ASCA were detected in 220 patients (67%), 88 patients (27%), 68 patients (21%), 61 patients (19%) and 42 patients (13%), respectively (Table III). Within the 42 ASCA-positive patients were 32 patients who were ASCA IgA+, 18 patients who were ASCA IgG+ and 8 patients who expressed both forms of ASCA. The frequency of high-level pANCA expression was significantly higher in BWI+ patients versus BWI- patients. No other significant differences in either frequency of serologic marker positivity or median antibody level were noted between the BWI+ and BWI- patient groups.

Table III. Serologic Expression in Patients With and Without Backwash Ileitis.

BWI + Patients* (n=38) BWI- Patients* (n=289) p value
pANCA
 Positive 30 (79) 190 (66) .14
 Median level 56 52 .07
 High-level (>100 EU/ml) 11 (29) 26 (9) 0.001
ASCA
 IgA+ 2 (5) 30 (10) .56
 IgG+ 1 (3) 17 (6) .71
 Either IgA+ or IgG+ 2 (5) 40 (14) .20
 Both IgA+ and IgG+ 1 (3) 7 (2) 1
 Median level IgA+ 35 34 .78
 Median level IgG+ 52 65 .44
anti-OmpC
 Positive 6 (16) 62 (21) .53
 Median level 29 34 .34
anti-CBir1
 Positive 8 (21) 53 (18) .66
 Median level 42 56 .34
anti-I2
 Positive 14 (37) 74 (26) .17
 Median level 29 33 .72
*

one BWI+ patient and 6 BWI- patients did not have serology BWI backwash ileitis

Pouchitis Development

After a median followup time after ileostomy closure of 26 months (range, 3 to 492 months), 90 patients developed pouchitis, representing an overall incidence of 27%. Median time to diagnosis of pouchitis was 9 months (range, 3 to 116 months). Acute pouchitis was seen in 53 patients (16%). Median time to the diagnosis of AP was 10 months (range, 3 to 166 months). The median number of acute pouchitis episodes per patient was 2 (range, 1 to 5). Chronic pouchitis developed in 37 patients (11%). Twenty-nine patients with CP were maintained on long-term antibiotic therapy. Four patients required a diverting ileostomy to control symptoms, two patients required immunomodulator therapy, and two patients were controlled using probiotic therapy alone. The median time to CP development was 6 months (range, 3 to 53 months). There was no significant difference in median time to pouchitis diagnosis between patients with acute pouchitis or chronic pouchitis.

Forty-two patients (13%) developed de novo CD of the pouch after IPAA. Median time to CD diagnosis was 8 months (range, 1 to 53). One patient developed CD of the pouch and proximal limb of the ileostomy one month after IPAA creation. All of the remaining patients developed CD more than 3 months after ileostomy closure. CD was diagnosed on the basis of afferent ileal limb disease (n=32), pouch fistulizing disease (n=5) and new perianal disease (n=5). Twenty-six patients were maintained on immunosuppressive therapy, 11 patients required a diverting ileostomy to control persistent symptoms after failing aggressive immunosuppression, and 5 patients were controlled with antibiotics alone.

Relationship between Backwash Ileitis and Outcome after IPAA

The association between the BWI+ and BWI- patient groups and outcome after IPAA is shown in Table IV. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of development of AP, CP, or CD using Cox-proportional hazards modeling (log-rank p-values for AP, CP, and CD were 0.63, 0.05, 0.96, respectively). Although there was a higher incidence of CP in BWI+ patients (21%) compared to BWI- patients (10%), this trend did not reach statistical significance. Since PSC, a well described risk factor for CP (11,20), was more common in the BWI+ patient group, we evaluated the association of BWI in patients who did not have PSC (n=322). Within this subgroup, CP was observed in 5 of the 33 BWI+ patients (15%) versus 27 of the 289 BWI- patients (9%) (p=0.35). Median time to diagnosis of acute pouchitis, chronic pouchitis and de novo CD were similar between BWI+ and BWI- patient groups (data not shown).

Table IV. Association Between Backwash Ileitis and Pouchitis / Crohn's Disease.

Diagnosis n Median Followup (months) Acute Pouchitis Chronic Pouchitis
Backwash positive 39 22 4 (10) 8 (21)
Backwash negative 295 29 49 (17) 29 (10)

Values in parentheses denote percentage

Factors Associated with Outcome in Patients with Backwash Ileitis

Associations of clinical characteristics and individual serologic responses to microbial antigens and outcome after IPAA in the BWI+ patient group are shown in Tables V and VI. None of the clinical variables examined was associated with either a favorable or adverse outcome in the BWI+ patient group. From a serological point of view, both anti-I2 and pANCA expression were not associated with any adverse outcome after surgery. Anti-OmpC was significantly associated with the development of denovo CD after IPAA. Although anti-CBir1 was also associated with denovo CD after IPAA, this trend was of borderline significance. ASCA-IgA expression was associated with the onset of chronic pouchitis. These trends were not observed in BWI+ patients who did not have PSC. Furthermore, we were unable to demonstrate any significant association when combining individual serologic markers and outcome after IPAA (data not shown).

Table V. Association of Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of IPAA in Patients With Backwash Ileitis.

Clinical Variable No Pouchitis Acute Pouchitis Chronic Pouchitis Crohn's Disease
Male Gender 50 15 15 20
Median age ≥36 65 10 20 5
Median disease duration ≥ 61 mo 55 10 20 15
Preoperative medication
 Steroids 50 0 50 0
 Immunomodulators 60 11 18 11
Extraintestinal disease
 Arthritis 80 20 0 0
 PSC 33 0 50 17
 Other 100 0 0 0
Family history of IBD 13 13 0
 Ulcerative colitis 75 0 25 0
 Crohn's disease 80 20 0 0
Perianal disease 40 20 0 40
Preoperative type of colitis
 Ulcerative colitis 68 11 21 0
 IBDU 50 10 20 20
Postoperative type of colitis
 Ulcerative colitis 75 6 13 6
 IC 48 13 26 13
Indication for IPAA
 Medically unresponsive 60 9 22 9
 Cancer / dysplasia 43 14 14 29

Values represent % of patients with the clinical variable that had each particular outcome

No differences were significant at p value <.05 (hypothesis testing by Chi square analysis or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate)

Table VI. Associations of Seromarker Expression and Outcome of IPAA in Patients With Backwash Ileitis.

Serology Acute Pouchitis Chronic Pouchitis Crohn's Disease

pANCA 13 27 17
High-level pANCA 18 18 27
anti-I2 7 29 7
anti-OmpC 17 17 50*
anti-Cbir1 13 25 38
ASCA
IgA+ 0 100+ 0
IgG+ 0 100 0
IgA+ and IgG+ 0 100++ 0

Values represent % of patients with the positive serology that had each particular outcome

*

p = 0.02

+

p = 0.04

++

p = 0.04 (hypothesis testing performed with Chi-square analysis or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate

Discussion

As long as symptoms are controlled by medical measures and no dysplasia or cancer develops, UC patients with BWI are managed with medical therapy in a similar fashion to UC patients without BWI. However, when colectomy is indicated, the distinction between BWI+ and BWI- may become important. Surgical outcomes after IPAA in BWI patients are controversial, with some studies reporting adverse effects of BWI+ versus BWI- and other studies showing no difference (Table VII). Many of these studies are retrospective in design, include small patient numbers, have suboptimal patient followup and are plagued with referral center bias. These discrepant data may also be partly explained by problems in clinical definitions of both BWI and pouchitis. The overall incidence of BWI varies significantly across studies (6% to 22%), corresponding to inconsistent clinical and pathologic criteria used to reach a diagnosis of BWI. Some studies have considered BWI to include not only patients with acute inflammation (i.e., the presence of neutrophils) but also patients who have chronic inflammation (i.e., lymphocytes) or those with morphologic features of regenerative changes without inflammation. We defined patients to have BWI only when there was acute inflammation in the extreme terminal ileum, corresponding to other expert opinions on this issue (21). Some authors define pouchitis on clinical grounds alone, while others require endoscopic confirmation. Although we do not believe that histologic assessment, as defined in the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (22), is necessary for the diagnosis of pouchitis, it is clear that symptoms alone are not sufficient to accurately diagnose this condition (23).

Table VII. Studies of Backwash Ileitis and Outcome after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Author (ref) Year Study Design N BWI (%) Diagnostic Criteria For Outcome (BWI+ versus BWI-neg)
BWI Pouchitis
Gustavsson (9) 1987 R 131 11 Radiographic, acute and chronic inflammation Clinical No difference
Schmidt (6) 1998 R 67 NR Acute and chronic inflammation Histologic Increased risk of pouchitis
Abdelrazeq (7) 2005 P 100 22 Acute inflammation Clinical, endoscopic, histologic Increased risk of pouchitis
Haskell (10) 2005 R 200 17 Regenerative changes without inflammation; Acute and chronic inflammation NR No difference
Fleshner (11) 2007 P 200 17 Acute inflammation Clinical, endoscopic No difference
Ferrante (8) 2008 R 173 6 NR Clinical, endoscopic Increased risk of chronic pouchitis
Current study - P 334 12 Acute inflammation Clinical, endoscopic No difference

Our study revealed a number of clinical phenotypes associated with BWI. The incidence of pancolitis was much higher in BWI+ patients compared to BWI-negative patients, corroborating the data of others (7,10). In fact, all of the BWI patients in our study had pancolitis. These data suggest that the presence of terminal ileal inflammation in a left-sided colitis patient should seriously raise the possibility of CD and not UC. The incidence of PSC was significantly higher in BWI+ patients compared to BWI- patients, also confirming the results of prior studies (24,25). Since bile acids are absorbed in the terminal ileum, it is interesting to speculate that the defects in bile acid metabolism noted in PSC patients (26) might account for the relationship between BWI and PSC.

Our study has several limitations. As a referral center, our patient population may have more aggressive or advanced disease at the time of surgery. However, one might conceive that this would actually bias results toward worse postoperative outcomes among those with ileal inflammation suggestive of backwash ileitis. A second limitation is that while the median duration to developing pouch inflammation was 9 months, some patients in the cohort were followed for fewer than 9 months. Thus, the possibility exists that these patients may develop pouch complications as they are followed out for a longer duration. Finally, our results are reported from the database of a single surgeon, and may thus not be readily generalizable.

A unique aspect of the current study was the evaluation of subclinical markers in BWI patients. There was no significant difference in serologic marker expression between BWI+ and BWI-negative patients, except that BWI+ patients did have a significantly higher incidence (29%) of high-level pANCA expression than BWI-negative patients (9%). Although the mechanism responsible for the relationship between high levels of the anti-microbial antibody pANCA (27) and BWI is not well understood, it supports the concept that luminal factors such as bacteria or their excreted products play an integral role. Our group has previously shown that ASCA positivity is a prominent feature of patients with well characterized small bowel CD (17,18). The low incidence of both ASCA-IgA (5 percent) and ASCA-IgG (3 percent) observed in BWI+ patients strongly suggests that the presence of BWI itself should dissuade clinicians from thinking these patients all have CD and not UC. Serologic differences noted between BWI+ and BWI-negative patients in the current study require validation from other centers.

From the surgical point of view, we observed in this study no significant differences in the development of acute pouchitis, chronic pouchitis or de novo CD after IPAA between patients with BWI and those without BWI. We also attempted to identify subgroups of BWI patients, based on clinical or subclinical features, with either a favorable or adverse outcome after IPAA. None of the clinical variables were significantly associated with outcome in BWI+ patients. Although anti-OmpC was significantly associated with the development of denovo CD and ASCA-IgA expression was associated with the onset of chronic pouchitis after IPAA, none of these trends were observed in BWI+ patients who did not have PSC. These data suggest that in the absence of PSC, the clinical outcome of IPAA in patients with BWI cannot be predicted. Colorectal surgeons should feel comfortable in performing an IPAA in patients with BWI, especially in the absence of PSC.

In summary, this prospective study has shown that BWI+ patients appear to have the same overall incidence of acute pouchitis, chronic pouchitis, and de novo CD after IPAA as do BWI-negative patients. Preoperative counseling of these patients should clearly include a discussion of these findings.

Footnotes

Author Contribution: White Data acquisition, data analysis

Melmed Data analysis, critical review

Vasiliauskas Critical review

Dubinsky Critical review

Dror Data analysis

Targan Critical review

Fleshner Conception and design, data acquisition, data analysis, critical review, final approval

References

  • 1.Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;222:120–7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199508000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, et al. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. Br J Surg. 1998;85:800–3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00689.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coffey JC, Winter DC, Neary P, Murphy A, Redmond HP, Kirwan WO. Quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: An evaluation of diet and other factors using the Cleveland Global Quality of Life instrument. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:30–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shen B, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of inflammatory and noninflammatory sequelae of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:93–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saltzstein SL, Rosenberg BF. Ulcerative colitis of the ileum, and regional enteritis of the colon: a comparative histopathologic study. Am J Clin Pathol. 1963;40:610–623. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/40.6.610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schmidt CM, Lazenby AJ, Hendrickson RJ, Sitzmann JV. Preoperative terminal ileal and colonic resection histopathology predicts risk of pouchitis in patients after ileoanal pull-through procedure. Ann Surg. 1998;227:654–65. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199805000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abdelrazeq AS, Wilson TR, Leitch DL, Lund JN, Leveson SH. Ileitis in ulcerative colitis: is it a backwash? Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(11):2038–46. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0160-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ferrante M, Declerk S, deHertogh G, et al. Outcome after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:20–8. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gustavsson S, Weiland LH, Kelly KA. Relationship of backwash ileitis to ileal pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:25–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02556916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haskell H, Andrews CW, Jr, Sarathchandra I, et al. Pathologic features and clinical significance of “backwash” ileitis in ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1472–1481. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000176435.19197.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fleshner PR, Ippoliti A, Dubinsky MC, et al. A prospective multivariate analysis of perioperative clinical factors associated with acute or chronic pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:952–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T, et al. Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease. Report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology. Can J Gastroenterol. 2005;19(Suppl. A):5–36. doi: 10.1155/2005/269076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Munoz-Juarez M, Pemberton JH, Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Dozois RR. Misdiagnosis of specific cytomegalovirus infection of the ileoanal pouch as refractory idiopathic chronic pouchitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:117–20. doi: 10.1007/BF02235196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wolf JM, Achkar JP, Lashner BA, Delaney CP, Petras RE, Goldblum JR, Connor JT, Remzi FH, Fazio VW. Afferent limb ulcers predict Crohn's disease in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1686–91. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shen B, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of inflammatory and noninflammatory sequelae of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:93–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Targan SR, Landers CJ, Yang H, et al. Antibodies to CBir1 flagellin define a unique response that is associated independently with complicated Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:2020–8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mow WS, Vasiliauskas EA, Lin YC, et al. Association of antibody responses to microbial antigens and complications of small bowel Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:414–24. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Landers CJ, Cohavy O, Misra R, et al. Selected loss of tolerance evidenced by Crohn's disease–associated immune responses to auto- and microbial antigens. Gastroenterology. 2002;123(3):689–699. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.35379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fleshner PR, Vasiliauskas EA, Kam LY, et al. High level perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA) in ulcerative colitis patients before colectomy predicts the development of chronic pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Gut. 2001;49:671–7. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.5.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Penna C, Dozois R, Tremaine W, et al. Pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis occurs with increased frequency in patients with associated primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut. 1996;38:234–9. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.2.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goldstein NS, Dulai M. Contemporary morphologic definition of backwash ileitis in ulcerative colitis and features that distinguish it from Crohn's disease. Am J Clin Path. 2006;126:365–37620. doi: 10.1309/UAXMW3428PGN9HJ3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Yu CS, Pemberton JH, Larson D. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate colitis: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1487–96. doi: 10.1007/BF02236726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Batts KP, Pemberton JH, Phillips SF. Pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index. Mayo Clinic Proc. 1994;69:409–415. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61634-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shen B, Achkar JP, Lashner BA, et al. Endoscopic and histologic evaluation together with symptom assessment are required to diagnose pouchitis. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:261–7. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.26290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hueschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, et al. Backwash ileitis is strongly associated with colorectal carcinoma in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:841–7. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.22434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Loftus EV, Jr, Harewood GC, Loftus CG, et al. PSC-IBD: a unique form of inflammatory bowel disease associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut. 2005;54:91–621. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.046615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Balan V, LaRusso NF. Hepatobiliary disease in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1995;24:647–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Seibold F, Brandwein S, Simpson S, Terhorst C, Elson CO. pANCA represents a cross-reactivity to enteric bacterial antigens. J Clin Immunol. 1998;18:153–8. doi: 10.1023/a:1023203118100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES