Abstract
Cholangiocytes, the lining epithelial cells in bile ducts, are an important subset of liver cells. They are activated by endogenous and exogenous stimuli and are involved in the modification of bile volume and composition. They are also involved in damaging and repairing the liver. Cholangiocytes have many functions including bile production. They are also involved in transport processes that regulate the volume and composition of bile. Cholangiocytes undergo proliferation and cell death under a variety of conditions. Cholangiocytes have functional and morphological heterogenecity. The immunobiology of cholangiocytes is important, particularly for understanding biliary disease. Secretion of different proinflammatory mediators, cytokines, and chemokines suggests the major role that cholangiocytes play in inflammatory reactions. Furthermore, paracrine secretion of growth factors and peptides mediates extensive cross-talk with other liver cells, including hepatocytes, stellate cells, stem cells, subepithelial myofibroblasts, endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells. Cholangiopathy refers to a category of chronic liver diseases whose primary disease target is the cholangiocyte. Cholangiopathy usually results in end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplant. We summarize the biology of cholangiocytes and redefine the concept of cholangiopathy. We also discuss the recent progress that has been made in understanding the pathogenesis of cholangiopathy and how such progress has influenced therapy.
Keywords: Cholangiocyte, Biology, Cholangiopathy, Transport, Receptors
INTRODUCTION
The biliary system is comprised of intrahepatic bile ducts, extrahepatic bile ducts and the gallbladder. Bile is transported by the extensive biliary tract, which measures approximately 2 km in human. A layer of epithelial cells called cholangiocytes lines the intrahepatic bile ducts of this extensive network. The extrahepatic ductal epithelial cells and gallbladder epithelial cells (GBECs) share many features with cholangiocytes. Cholangiocytes comprise only about 3% to 5% of the total cell mass of the liver, but they are crucial for normal physiologic processes, and they contribute to multiple disease states of the biliary tract.1–5
Cholangiocytes serve several functions performed by several important molecules. Most importantly, cholangiocytes participate in the formation and transportation of bile via transmembrane molecules that are expressed on the apical or basolateral membrane. These transporters include channels (i.e., water channels [aquaporins]), transporters (i.e., SGLT1: Na+-glucose transporter), and exchangers (i.e., SLC4A2: Cl−/HCO3− exchanger). Impairing these molecules could lead to cholestasis (Fig. 1).6–8 Cholangiocytes also interact with resident and nonresident cells of the bile ducts via inflammatory and fibrotic mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6). On the other hand, diseased cholangiocytes can cause biliary inflammation and fibrosis. Finally, cholangiocytes are involved in cell-cycle phenomena that maintain tissue homeostasis in the biliary system via modulators of apoptosis (i.e., AkT1: protein kinase B α), senescence (i.e., N-RAS transforming protein), and proliferation (i.e., platelet-derived growth factor). Damage to the cholangiocytes may result in ductopenia, dysplasia, or malignant transformation of the bile ducts (Fig. 2).6–8
Unlike other epithelial cells, cholangiocytes are morphologically and functionally heterogeneous.9,10 Small cholangiocytes possess proliferative capabilities and display functional plasticity in disease, while large cholangiocytes are involved in hormone-regulated bile secretion. Stem cells in the peribiliary glands that can differentiate into cholangiocytes may be involved in biliary remodeling and pathogenesis of cholangiopathies.11,12 Understanding the biology of cholangiocytes allows us to understand the mechanisms of cholangiopathy (Fig. 2) and to develop adequate treatment for these diseases.
Findings from electron microscopy of cholangiocytes show the apical microvilli facing the lumen of the bile duct and various micro-organelles, such as the rough endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, vesicles, and nucleus in cytoplasm. From such findings, we can speculate that cholangiocytes are incredibly versatile and complex in their functions. The cholangiocyte indeed has many functions, which can be categorized into four broad areas. Firstly, cholangiocytes are involved in transport processes that regulate the volume and composition of bile. Secondly, cholnagiocytes undergo proliferation and cell death under a variety of conditions, some of which are important in our understanding of disease states. Thirdly, the concept of cholangiocyte heterogeneity has attracted attention, as not all cholangiocytes are functionally or morphologically identical. Finally, the immunobiology of the cholangiocyte is important for understanding diseases characterized by vanishing bile ducts, such as primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), allograft rejection, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).1–4,13,14
CHOLANGIOPATHY
Based on the importance of cholangiocytes in normal hepatobiliary physiology emerged the idea of cholangiopathy—a disease state that is characterized by abnormalities in cholangiocyte function. Cholangiopathy can be generally classified into immune-mediated states (some of which are characterized by the vanishing bile duct syndromes), infectious, genetic, idiopathic, malignant, and secondary sclerosing cholangitis (Table 1).6 To understand the variety in cholangiopathy, a review of cholangiocyte biology is crucial.1,4,5,15–18
Table 1.
Immune mediated | Idiopathic or immune mediated |
Hepatic allograft rejection | Autoimmune cholangitis |
GVHD | Biliary atresia* |
PBC | Idiopathic childhood/adulthood ductopenia |
Autoimmune cholangitis | IgG4-associated cholangitis |
PSC | PBC* |
PSC* | |
Infectious | Malignant |
Viral (incl. HIV-associated cholangitis) | Cholangiocarcinoma |
Bacterial | |
Fungal | |
Parasitic | |
Protozoan | |
Genetic | Secondary sclerosing cholangitis |
Alagille syndrome | ABCB4 deficiency |
Caroli syndrome | Abdominal trauma (surgical or blunt) |
Cystic fibrosis | AIDS cholangiopathy |
Polycystic liver disease | Amyloidosis |
ADPLD | Chemical/drugs (i.e., 5-fluorouracil) |
ADPKD | Choledocholithiasis |
ARPKD | Eosinophilic or mast cell cholangitis |
GVHD involving the liver | |
Iatrogenic biliary strictures | |
Portal hypertensive biliopathy | |
Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis | |
Sarcoidosis | |
Sickle cell disease | |
Vascular/ischemic (i.e., hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplant) |
GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; PBC, primary biliary cirrhosis; PSC, primary sclerosing cholangitis; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; AD-PLD, autosomal dominant polycystic liver disease; ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; ARPKD, autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease; ABCB, ATP-binding cassette transporter B; AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
For the genetic component of these diseases.
Each type of cholangiopathy has a unique manifestation and clinical course, yet they share common processes that involve proinflammatory signaling, innate immune responses, cholangiocyte proliferation and differentiation, as well as tissue repair processes.6
Cholangiocytes are activated by various insults, which then increase expression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and various growth factors).19 The released molecules act in autocrine and paracrine manners, and ultimately lead to cholangiocyte proliferation, apoptosis, senescence, angiogenesis, fibrosis, and the recruitment of innate and adaptive immune cells, mesenchymal cells, and endothelial cells. Such events result in ductal reactions such as proliferation of ductules, infiltration of leukocytes and lymphocytes, activation of liver progenitor cells, and an increase in matrix protein. Eventually, these events result in periportal fibrosis, ductopenia, and biliary cirrhosis (Fig. 2).6,20
The initial host response to various insults is the reactive cholangiocyte and the creation of a bile duct proinflammatory microenvironment. The host factors likely depend on genetic susceptibility, epigenetics, posttranscriptional regulation, or other yet unknown mechanisms, may lead to repair/resolution or to chronic inflammation of the bile ducts when the initial inflammatory response is perpetuated. Cholangiopathy ultimately results in cholestasis, bile duct proliferation, ductopenia, fibrosis, and potential malignant transformation (Fig. 2).6
EXPERIMENTAL MODELS
Our understanding of cholangiocyte biology is linked to advances in the methodology for studying these cells. Much research has been done in animal models, particularly using rats. Cholangiocytes selectively proliferate in response to various in vivo methods such as bile duct ligation, dietary manipulation, and partial hepatectomy. This allows for cholangiocytes to be harvested for further studies. Another advanced method has been the isolation of intact bile duct units. This method anables in vitro transport studies to be performed. Finally, having cultures of either normal or malignant cholangiocytes allow cell biologic studies to be performed.21–24
THE MECHANISMS OF DUCTAL BILE FORMATION
As mentioned earlier, cholangiocytes can contribute up to 40% of the daily bile output. In the bile duct ligated rat model, it was shown that cholangiocytes increased their secretory ability. Fig. 3 shows some of the important pathways that mediate secretory functions of cholangiocyte. Secretin initiates bile formation by binding to its receptor on the basolateral membrane and activating the cyclic adenosin mono-phpsphate (cAMP) signaling pathway. cAMP is important for activating apical chloride channels, which are believed to be cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator.
This efflux of chloride ions drives bicarbonate secretion by activating the chloride/bicarbonate exchanger, called AE2. An important component of cholangiocyte secretion is water, and specific water channels called aquaporins have been identified. Aquaporin 1 resides in intracellular vesicles and is stimulated by cAMP to migrate to the apical membrane. In the active state, it mediates water efflux from the cell, and somatostatin acts to inhibit this process. A separate water channel, aquaporin 4, is located on the basolateral side, but its secretory function is much less than that of apical aquaporin 1.6,7,25–29
Cholangiocytes contribute to the alkalinity of bile by secreting bicarbonate. Apart from CFTR and the anion exchanger previously mentioned, there are sodium/hydrogen exchangers on the basolateral and apical surface of the cholangiocyte. In addition, a sodium/bicarbonate symport mechanism exists at the basolateral surface (Fig. 3).6,7,30 Bicarbonate can be converted to carbonic acid, and through the action of carbonic anhydrase, it can be converted to carbon dioxide and water. Bicarbonate efflux from the cell occurs predominantly via the apical anion exchanger. Bicarbonate efflux by secretin is responsive to acetylcholine, which increases by intracellular calcium.
HEPATODUCTAL COMMUNICATION: THE ROLE OF ATP
How do hepatocytes communicate with cholangiocytes? An emerging theory is that 5′-adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and other purines are involved in signaling between these two cell types. ATP is secreted by both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, and its binding to purinergic receptors initiates the secretory processes outlined earlier, including the secretion of choloride and of bicarbonate. ATP acts as both an autocrine and a paracrine regulator of bile flow in intrahepatic bile ducts.31,32
IONIC CHANNEL ORGANIZATION WITHIN THE CHOLANGIOCYTE PLASMA MEMBRANE
Due to the presence of numerous ion channels, the communication and coordination between these plasma membrane proteins is another area of investigation. The concept is emerging that ion channels (and perhaps other integral membrane proteins) are arranged in multiprotein complexes that allow for a coordinated function. A family of linker proteins called ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) proteins have PDZ (post synaptic density protein [PSD95], drosophila disc large tumor suppressor [Dlg1], and zonula occludens-1 protein [zo-1]) binding domains that allow for protein-protein interactions to take place. These PDZ binding domains allow the C-termini of integral membrane proteins to bind to EBP50, which in turn binds to an ERM protein such as ezrin. When bound to the cAMP-sensitive protein, kinase A, the ERM protein brings the kinase close to its target. ERM proteins also bind to actin, which promotes the formation of a cytoskeleton scaffold for these multiprotein complexes. In summary, these linker proteins provide a coordinated function by bringing different ion channels in close proximity to each other and to regulatory proteins.33
BILE ACID TRANSPORT IN CHOLANGIOCYTES (THE CHOLEHEPATIC SHUNT)
Another important function of cholangiocytes is their role in bile acid transport. Cholangiocytes are exposed to high concentrations of bile on their apical side, and bile acids have been known to stimulate bile flow. There is now evidence of the existence of a cholehepatic shunt pathway that allows for the transport of bile acid back to the liver. The apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT, which is the same as the ileal bile acid transporter) has been identified on the apical membrane of cholangiocytes. ASBT transports bile acids into cholangiocytes where they can have multiple effects. They can stimulate a secretin-induced cAMP secretory response as well as stimulate bicarbonate secretion. They can be conjugated with taurine or glycine; and they can have proliferative effects on the cell. A truncated form of the ASBT has been identified on the basolateral membrane, and the existence of another sodium-independent bile acid transporter on the basolateral membrane has been identified. The machinery exists in the cholehepatic shunt pathway in order to absorb bile acids and transport them back to the liver.34,35
MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL HETEROGENEITY OF CHOLANGIOCYTES
Another important concept that has emerged is the morphological and functional heterogenecity of cholangiocytes. Small cholangiocytes, taken from bile ducts less than 15 microns in diameter, look and behave very differently from large cholangiocytes, which are taken from bile ducts larger than 15 microns. Small cholangiocytes are cuboidal, but the larger cholangiocytes are more columnar. Moreover, small cholangiocytes have inconspicuous organelles and minimal cytoplasm, whereas large cholangiocytes have plenty of organelles and a small nucleus/cytoplasm ratio. The large, but not the small, cholangiocytes have cilia. Small and large cholangiocytes differentially express the array of receptors, enzymes and transporters. More is known about the function of large cholangiocytes. Large cholangiocytes are characterized by the expression of CFTR, the anion exchanger, the bile acid transporter, the secretin receptor and proliferative response to bile duct ligation. However, small cholangiocytes do not have a hormone regulated ductal secretory response, do not respond to bile duct ligation, and are resistant to carbon tetrachloride. Small cholangiocytes are more resistant to injury: when animals are intoxicated with CCl4, large cholangiocytes undergo apoptosis, whereas small cholangiocytes proliferate, in a sort of a compensatory attempt. Small cholangiocytes can be express the secretin receptor and exhibit a secretin-induced cAMP response following the death of large cholangiocytes in animal experiment with CCl4.36–38
CHOLANGIOCYTE PROLIFERATION
Cholangiocyte proliferation can be induced by multiple pathways. We have already mentioned that cholangiocyte is a proliferative response to bile acids. Additionally, acetylcholine, estrogen, hepatocyte growth factor, and IL-6 all can signal via specific receptor binding, which leads to the proliferation. For IL-6, there appears to be an autocrine loop that can be initiated by proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, and by bacterial products like lipopolysaccharide (LPS). There are antiproliferative mediators as well. Somatostatin, gastrin, and interferon γ (IFN-γ) are some of the known antiproliferative agents.39,40
Stem cells in the peribiliary glands that can differentiate into cholangiocytes may be involved in biliary remodeling and pathogenesis of cholangiopathies.11,12
CHOLANGIOCYTE APOPTOSIS
Cholangiocytes can die by programmed cell death, or apoptosis. The Fas/Fas ligand system activates apoptosis in cholangiocytes, which are capable of expressing both the receptor and the ligand. This pathway may be important in PBC. The protozoan, Cryptosporidium parvum also initiates apoptosis through this pathway. Glycoursodeoxycholic acid inhibits apoptosis by blocking a key protease called caspase 3. The balance between the pro-apoptotic BAX and the antiapoptotic bcl-2 also determines whether a cell lives or dies. Carbon tetrachloride can poison cells by initiating programmed cell death. Finally, blockade of the estrogen receptor causes programmed cell death. Understanding these pathways is important, not only for certain infections such as that due to C. parvum, but also because insights into these cellular mechanisms allow us to better understand vanishing bile duct syndromes, such as PBC and GVHD.41,42
IMMUNOBIOLOGY OF CHOLANGIOCYTES
The biliary tract excretes bile into the duodenum and communicates with the gastrointestinal tract. Microorganisms present in the duodenum can cause ascending infections of the biliary tract.6,7,43,44
The immunobiology of the cholangiocyte is another area of intense investigation due to the importance of immune-mediated mechanisms in vanishing bile duct syndromes, infection and inflammation. Cholangiocytes participate in the immune pathogenesis of both infectious and noninfectious hepatobiliary diseases and they play an important role in both innate and adaptive immunity. Recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns by Toll-like receptors leads to the secretion of antimicrobial peptides, inflammatory cytokines, and the expression of adhesion molecules that allow for an interplay between the innate and adaptive immune responses.6,43
Cholangiocytes express adhesion molecules, which allow their interaction with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.44,45 Cholangiocytes can also communicate directly with lymphocytes, such as the T helper subsets, or cytotoxic T lymphocytes. The presentation of antigens on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and MHC class II molecules by cholangiocytes in disease states such as PBC has been demonstrated; however, there is some controversy regarding whether cholangiocytes are true antigen presenting cells. The presence of adhesion molecules such as intercellular cell adhesion molecule 1 and lymphocyte function-associated antigen-3 allows for direct cell-cell contact between cholangiocytes and lymphocytes, suggesting that cholangiocytes play a direct role in the immune response (Fig. 4).46–49 We have already mentioned the ability of these cells to secrete and respond to cytokines—examples given here are IL-6 and TNF-α.50
Cholangiocytes produce chemokines and cytokines,50 which modulate immune reactions through either autocrine or paracrine effects. In addition, cholangiocytes secrete metalloproteinases, nitric oxide (NO), and other growth factors involved in injury and in fibrogenesis of the liver (Fig. 4).44
Cholangiocytes communicate and interact with other cells in the liver.51 Reactive cholangiocytes secrete mediators and immune factors that stimulate and activate several cellular subtypes. Cholangiocytes produce IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and IFN-γ, which regulate the immune activity of polymorphonuclear cells, Kupffer cells, and T cells. ET-1, platelet-derived growth factor BB, transforming growth factor β2,51 connective tissue growth factor, and NO and produced by cholangiocytes and stimulate subepithelial stellate cells or myofibroblasts, leading to reparative processes and/or fibrosis in the liver.44,45,51
CHOLANGIOCYTE VERSATILITY: ESPECIALLY CHOLESTEROL METABOLISM
Table 2 emphasizes the variety of roles that cholangiocytes play. This list highlights not only the complexity of these cells, but also serves as a reminder of how little we truly know about them. Cholangiocytes are versatile cells involved in secretory and absorptive functions that modify the composition of bile. Cholangiocytes express proteins involved in drug or xenobiotics metabolism, cholesterol biosynthesis and transport, mucin secretion, glucose transport, and apolipoprotein synthesis.1,2,13 The role of these proteins was well known for a long time, therefore I will not be mentioning the role of those proteins in this review. Recently cholesterol transporters and nuclear hormone receptors associated lipid metabolism investigated in many studies.
Table 2.
Drug metabolizing enzymes |
Cytochrome P450 1A, 2E1, 3A |
Glutathione S-transferase |
Drug efflux transporters |
P-glycoprotein |
MRP-1, MRP-3 |
Cytokines |
IL-1β, IL-6 |
TNF-α |
Cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC) |
Sterol metabolism enzymes |
HMG-CoA reductase |
Cholesterol 7-α hydroxylase |
Mucins |
MUC3, MUC5B, MUC6 |
Growth factors |
EGF, HGF, PDGF |
Miscellaneous |
Apolipoproteins |
Sodium-dependent glucose transporter (SGLT1) |
Facilitative glucose transporter (GLUT1) |
Reverse cholesterol transporter (ABCA1) |
ABCG5, G8 |
MRP, multidrug resistance protein; IL, interleukin; TNF; tumor necrosis factor; HMG, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl; MUC, mucin; EGF, epidermal growth factor; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; ABCG, ATP binding cassette transporter G.
Bile contains cholesterol, and thus the concentration of bile within the gallbladder results in high cholesterol levels in this organ.52,53 This facilitates cholesterol gallstone formation and cholesterolosis of the gallbladder wall.54,55 GBECs are exposed to high and fluctuating biliary cholesterol concentrations on their apical surfaces. They absorb biliary cholesterol via both passive and active mechanisms,56,57 but the fate of this absorbed cholesterol is unclear. Cholesterol release from peripheral tissues, primarily from macrophage-derived foam cells, is the first step in a process called “reverse cholesterol transport.”58,59 In this pathway, excess cholesterol present in peripheral tissue cells is incorporated into high density lipoproteins, which deliver the excess cholesterol to the liver for excretion, either directly or indirectly by transfer to low density lipoprotein.60 A number of different mechanisms participate in transporting cholesterol from cells to extracellular acceptor lipoproteins. These cholesterol efflux pathways include unmediated diffusion61 and protein mediated transport by scavenger receptor BI or ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1).62,63 ATP binding cassette transporter G5 and ABCG8 form heterodimers that are expressed on the canalicular membranes of hepatocytes, where they excrete cholesterol into bile.64,65 It has been suggested that ABCG5/ABCG8 play a role in sterol flux at the apical pole of polarized epithelial cells in the liver. The unloading of cellular cholesterol onto cholesterol acceptors66 is also likely to be important in maintaining cholesterol homeostasis within the gallbladder wall and in the gallbladder lumen. The relative contributions of basolateral and apical disposition of cholesterol by GBECs is likely to be important in determining aberrant cholesterol disposition in the wall and lumen of gallbladder. It has been previously reported that ABCA1 is expressed on the basolateral membranes of cultured dog GBECs, where it mediates cholesterol efflux via a liver X receptor a/retinoid X receptor ligand-sensitive mechanism.55,67,68
The mechanisms involved in apical cholesterol flux in gall-bladder epithelium are unknown, but are likely to involve ABCG5/ABCG8.53,54 Little is known regarding the existence and function of ABCA1, ABCG5, and ABCG8 in human GBECs. The sterol transporters ABCA1, ABCG5, and ABCG8 may play a role in the pathogenesis of human cholesterol associated gallbladder diseases. Inflammation appears to be a key factor that increases ABCA1 expression and activity in the human gallbladder.53,54,69,70
In addition, it also has been demonstrated that ligands of per-oxisome proliferator-activated receptor modulate inflammation and affect ABCA1 expression in GBEC. This evidence suggests that GBECs have a perfect system for cholesterol transport.71–73
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Cholangiopathies are heterogeneous etiology, but share two major features: (1) dysregulated balance between cell proliferation and survival; (2) selectively target either small or large bile ducts. The two most common cholangiopathies are PBC and PSC.74
Cholangiocyte heterogeneity that two different (small and large) cholangiocyte subpopulations exist, which differ in morphological and biological aspects. Cholangiopathies target either small or large bile ducts.74
Cholangiocyte functional activity is regulated by secretin, which induces HCO3− in bile by the activation of the AE2 exchanger. AE2 knockout animals develop a PBC-like phenotype. A variant of the AE2 gene discriminate patients with slower progression of PBC.7,10,13
Cholangiocyte biology and response to injury is regulated by bile acids in conditions of cholestasis and ductopenia, bile acids exert cytoprotective effects. Exacerbation of liver injury is observed in models of PSC-like cholestasis. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only compound to show some effects in PBC, whereas limited effects are observed in PSC. Alternative therapies for cholestatic liver diseases is required. Two bile acids derivatives as obeticholic acid (OCA) and nor-ursodeoxycholic acid (nor-UDCA) show promising results recently.75
OCA is a semisynthetic analogue of chenodeoxycholic acid that possesses a strong farnesoid X receptor (FXR) affinity. Endogenous bile acids bind to FXR, which in turn represses or induces the expression of various genes involved in their synthesis and secretion, such as cytochrome P450 7A1 (CYP7A1), bile salt export pump, and sodium-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide. Chenodeoxycholic acid is the most potent endogenous FXR ligand (with a 100-fold less affinity than OCA) whereas UDCA has no affinity.76,77
Nor-UDCA, a C(23) homologue of UCDA, which is novel candidate for the therapy of cholangiopathies able to ameliorate sclerosing cholangitis in Mdr2 knockout mice. Nor-UDCA actions are following: increased hydrophilicity of bile acids; stimulated bile flow with flushing of injured bile ducts, and detoxification and elimination routes for bile acids.78,79
Cholangiocytes express both adrenergic and cholinergic receptors. The autonomic innervation: (1) sustains cholangiocyte proliferation and prevent apoptosis in response to injury; (2) maintain an adequate bile acids transporter (ASBT) in cholangiocytes. Development of non-anastomotic biliary strictures in the transplanted liver occurs as a consequence of impaired hepatocellular transporters.74,75
Cholangiocytes express estrogen receptors, which exert cytoprotective effects and sustain their response to injury. PBC is more frequent in women, and its clinical breakthrough is often after menopause. Estrogen receptor expression is markedly reduced in late stage PBC.80–82
Reactive cholangiocytes synthesize and locally release endogenous opioid peptides, which inhibit their biological response to injury. Endogenous opioid peptides contribute to the genesis of pruritus in cholestatic patients; the administration of opiate-antagonists is effective in reducing pruritus in those patients.83–85
Reactive cholangiocytes synthesize and locally release serotonin, which inhibits their biological response to injury. Administration of sertraline resulted effective in ameliorating pruritus in patients with PBC. Altered response to the activation serotonin receptors is malignant cholangiocytes.83,86–88
Cholangiocyte release IGF-1 and VEGF in response to injury; they stimulate cholangiocyte biological response to injury. IGF-1 and VEGF stimulate cholangiocarcinoma cell growth. VEGF allows the expansion of the PBP (peribiliary vascular plexus). Progression of PBC and PSC is associated with an upcoming reduction of the PBP around bile ducts. Antiangiogenic therapies may be effective in cholangiocarcinoma. Measurement of biliary IGF-1 levels in patients with biliary strictures discriminate between cholangiocarcinoma and other causes of biliary obstruction.89–91
The activation of the GLP-1 receptor in cholangiocytes sustain proliferation and prevents apoptosis. GLP-1 analogues are available as novel tools in the therapy of diabetes in humans. Possible effects in preventing bile duct loss observed in PBC patients.92
In response to bacterial products, auto-antibodies and cytokines, cholangiocytes express adhesion molecule and release leuco-attractant cytokines. Cytokines impair cholangiocyte functions. In the course of cholangiopathies, cholangiocytes are exposed to bacterial products like LPS or auto-antibodies.93–95
Monoclonal antibodies is a possible therapeutic tool to treat cholangiopathies.96 Rituximab has been tested in six PBC patients who have an incomplete response to UDCA.97 Based on genetic association between the IL-2, IL-23 pathways and PBC,98,99 ustekinumab, an anti-p40 monoclonal antibody is currently under way.
BTT1023 is a human monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular adhesion protein-1, a molecule that has been shown to stimulate the recruitment of effector lymphocytes to the liver through the upregulation of the endothelial cell adhesion molecule MadCAM-1.100,101 Simtuzumab is directed against the lysyl oxidase-like protein 2, an enzyme that favors the cross-linking of collagen and elastin fibers.102 These two monoclonal antibodies are investigated in PSC patients.
CONCLUSIONS
An overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the biology of the cholangiocyte has been summarized in this review. Cholangiocytes are versatile cells involved in transport processes that modify the composition and volume of bile. Cholangiocytes undergo proliferation and programmed cell death in response to certain stimuli, and they are functionally and morphologically heterogeneous. Finally, cholangiocytes participate in multiple immune responses. All of these cholangiocyte functions are relevant, because they provide insight into the pathophysiology of cholangiopathies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Prof. Rahul Kuver for contributing his extensive knowledge and preparing some figures for this review.
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
REFERENCES
- 1.Alpini G, McGill JM, Larusso NF. The pathobiology of biliary epithelia. Hepatology. 2002;35:1256–1268. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.33541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Strazzabosco M, Spirlí C, Okolicsanyi L. Pathophysiology of the intrahepatic biliary epithelium. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:244–253. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roberts SK, Ludwig J, Larusso NF. The pathobiology of biliary epithelia. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:269–279. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70244-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tietz PS, Larusso NF. Cholangiocyte biology. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2006;22:279–287. doi: 10.1097/01.mog.0000218965.78558.bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Strazzabosco M, Fabris L, Spirli C. Pathophysiology of cholangiopathies. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39(4 Suppl 2):S90–S102. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000155549.29643.ad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lazaridis KN, LaRusso NF. The cholangiopathies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:791–800. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lazaridis KN, Strazzabosco M, Larusso NF. The cholangiopathies: disorders of biliary epithelia. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1565–1577. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bogert PT, LaRusso NF. Cholangiocyte biology. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2007;23:299–305. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3280b079fb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Alvaro D, Mancino MG, Glaser S, et al. Proliferating cholangiocytes: a neuroendocrine compartment in the diseased liver. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:415–431. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Marzioni M, Glaser SS, Francis H, Phinizy JL, LeSage G, Alpini G. Functional heterogeneity of cholangiocytes. Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22:227–240. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cardinale V, Wang Y, Carpino G, et al. Multipotent stem/progenitor cells in human biliary tree give rise to hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, and pancreatic islets. Hepatology. 2011;54:2159–2172. doi: 10.1002/hep.24590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Carpino G, Cardinale V, Onori P, et al. Biliary tree stem/progenitor cells in glands of extrahepatic and intraheptic bile ducts: an anatomical in situ study yielding evidence of maturational lineages. J Anat. 2012;220:186–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01462.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Desmet VJ. Vanishing bile duct disorders. Prog Liver Dis. 1992;10:89–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sirica AE. Biology of biliary epithelial cells. Prog Liver Dis. 1992;10:63–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Onori P, Franchitto A, Alvaro D, Gaudio E. Immunohistochemical features of bile duct epithelial cells in normal and experimental liver conditions. Ital J Anat Embryol. 2001;106(2 Suppl 1):371–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakanuma Y, Tsuneyama K, Harada K. Pathology and pathogenesis of intrahepatic bile duct loss. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8:303–315. doi: 10.1007/s005340170002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu Z, Sakamoto T, Yokomuro S, et al. Acute obstructive cholangiopathy in interleukin-6 deficient mice: compensation by leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) suggests importance of gp-130 signaling in the ductular reaction. Liver. 2000;20:114–124. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2000.020002114.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reynoso-Paz S, Coppel RL, Ansari AA, Gershwin ME. Vanishing bile duct syndromes: considerations of the immunobiology of autoimmune biliary diseases. Isr Med Assoc J. 1999;1:37–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.O’Hara SP, Tabibian JH, Splinter PL, LaRusso NF. The dynamic biliary epithelia: molecules, pathways, and disease. J Hepatol. 2013;58:575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Desmet VJ. Ductal plates in hepatic ductular reactions. Hypothesis and implications. I. Types of ductular reaction reconsidered. Virchows Arch. 2011;458:251–259. doi: 10.1007/s00428-011-1048-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tietz PS, Chen XM, Gong AY, et al. Experimental models to study cholangiocyte biology. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:1–4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v8.i1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Masyuk TV, Ritman EL, LaRusso NF. Quantitative assessment of the rat intrahepatic biliary system by three-dimensional reconstruction. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:2079–2088. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64679-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khaoustov VI, Darlington GJ, Soriano HE, et al. Induction of three-dimensional assembly of human liver cells by simulated microgravity. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1999;35:501–509. doi: 10.1007/s11626-999-0060-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Joplin R. Isolation and culture of biliary epithelial cells. Gut. 1994;35:875–878. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.7.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Splinter PL, Masyuk AI, Marinelli RA, LaRusso NF. AQP4 transfected into mouse cholangiocytes promotes water transport in biliary epithelia. Hepatology. 2004;39:109–116. doi: 10.1002/hep.20033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shibao K, Hirata K, Robert ME, Nathanson MH. Loss of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors from bile duct epithelia is a common event in cholestasis. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1175–1187. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)01201-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Baiocchi L, Alpini G, Glaser S, et al. Taurohyodeoxycholate- and tauroursodeoxycholate-induced hypercholeresis is augmented in bile duct ligated rats. J Hepatol. 2003;38:136–147. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00358-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Feranchak AP, Sokol RJ. Cholangiocyte biology and cystic fibrosis liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2001;21:471–488. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-19030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Feranchak AP, Roman RM, Doctor RB, Salter KD, Toker A, Fitz JG. The lipid products of phosphoinositide 3-kinase contribute to regulation of cholangiocyte ATP and chloride transport. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:30979–30986. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.43.30979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Melero S, Spirlì C, Zsembery A, et al. Defective regulation of cholangiocyte Cl-/HCO3(−) and Na+/H+ exchanger activities in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2002;35:1513–1521. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.33634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Feranchak AP, Fitz JG. Adenosine triphosphate release and purinergic regulation of cholangiocyte transport. Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22:251–262. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Roman RM, Feranchak AP, Salter KD, Wang Y, Fitz JG. Endogenous ATP release regulates Cl- secretion in cultured human and rat biliary epithelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1999;276(6 Pt 1):G1391–G1400. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1999.276.6.G1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zsembery A, Spirlì C, Granato A, et al. Purinergic regulation of acid/base transport in human and rat biliary epithelial cell lines. Hepatology. 1998;28:914–920. doi: 10.1002/hep.510280403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Strazzabosco M, Joplin R, Zsembery A, et al. Na(+)-dependent and -independent Cl-/HCO-3 exchange mediate cellular HCO3-transport in cultured human intrahepatic bile duct cells. Hepatology. 1997;25:976–985. doi: 10.1002/hep.510250431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Strazzabosco M. Transport systems in cholangiocytes: their role in bile formation and cholestasis. Yale J Biol Med. 1997;70:427–434. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.LeSage GD, Benedetti A, Glaser S, et al. Acute carbon tetrachloride feeding selectively damages large, but not small, cholangiocytes from normal rat liver. Hepatology. 1999;29:307–319. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Alpini G, Glaser SS, Ueno Y, et al. Heterogeneity of the proliferative capacity of rat cholangiocytes after bile duct ligation. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(4 Pt 1):G767–G775. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1998.274.4.G767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Alpini G, Roberts S, Kuntz SM, et al. Morphological, molecular, and functional heterogeneity of cholangiocytes from normal rat liver. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:1636–1643. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8613073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Alvaro D, Alpini G, Onori P, et al. Estrogens stimulate proliferation of intrahepatic biliary epithelium in rats. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1681–1691. doi: 10.1053/gast.2000.20184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Park J, Gores GJ, Patel T. Lipopolysaccharide induces cholangiocyte proliferation via an interleukin-6-mediated activation of p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Hepatology. 1999;29:1037–1043. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chen XM, Levine SA, Tietz P, et al. Cryptosporidium parvum is cytopathic for cultured human biliary epithelia via an apoptotic mechanism. Hepatology. 1998;28:906–913. doi: 10.1002/hep.510280402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Celli A, Que FG. Dysregulation of apoptosis in the cholangiopathies and cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 1998;18:177–185. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1007153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Syal G, Fausther M, Dranoff JA. Advances in cholangiocyte immunobiology. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;303:G1077–G1086. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00227.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fava G, Glaser S, Francis H, Alpini G. The immunophysiology of biliary epithelium. Semin Liver Dis. 2005;25:251–264. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-916318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chuang YH, Lan RY, Gershwin ME. The immunopathology of human biliary cell epithelium. Semin Immunopathol. 2009;31:323–331. doi: 10.1007/s00281-009-0172-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Reynoso-Paz S, Coppel RL, Mackay IR, Bass NM, Ansari AA, Gershwin ME. The immunobiology of bile and biliary epithelium. Hepatology. 1999;30:351–357. doi: 10.1002/hep.510300218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ueno Y, Phillips JO, Ludwig J, Lichtman SN, LaRusso NF. Development and characterization of a rodent model of immune-mediated cholangitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:216–220. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.LaRusso NF. Morphology, physiology, and biochemistry of biliary epithelia. Toxicol Pathol. 1996;24:84–89. doi: 10.1177/019262339602400112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Galperin C, Gershwin ME. Immunopathology of primary biliary cirrhosis. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1996;10:461–481. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3528(96)90053-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Savard CE, Blinman TA, Choi HS, Lee SK, Pandol SJ, Lee SP. Expression of cytokine and chemokine mRNA and secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha by gallbladder epithelial cells: response to bacterial lipopolysaccharides. BMC Gastroenterol. 2002;2:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-2-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Choi HS, Savard CE, Choi JW, Kuver R, Lee SP. Paclitaxel interrupts TGF-beta1 signaling between gallbladder epithelial cells and myofibroblasts. J Surg Res. 2007;141:183–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.12.558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Choi HS, Kim YW. Oxysterol (3,5-cholestadien-7-one, 5 beta-cholestan-3-one, 5,24-cholestadien-3 beta-OL) induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis in gallbladder epithelial cells. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2004;44:328–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yoon JH, Choi HS, Jun DW, et al. ATP-binding cassette sterol transporters are differentially expressed in normal and diseased human gallbladder. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:431–439. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2481-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tauscher A, Kuver R. ABCG5 and ABCG8 are expressed in gallbladder epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;307:1021–1028. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01296-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lee J, Shirk A, Oram JF, Lee SP, Kuver R. Polarized cholesterol and phospholipid efflux in cultured gall-bladder epithelial cells: evidence for an ABCA1-mediated pathway. Biochem J. 2002;364(Pt 2):475–484. doi: 10.1042/bj20011493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jacyna MR, Ross PE, Bakar MA, Hopwood D, Bouchier IA. Characteristics of cholesterol absorption by human gall bladder: relevance to cholesterolosis. J Clin Pathol. 1987;40:524–529. doi: 10.1136/jcp.40.5.524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Neiderhiser DH, Harmon CK, Roth HP. Absorption of cholesterol by the gallbladder. J Lipid Res. 1976;17:117–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Angelin B, Parini P, Eriksson M. Reverse cholesterol transport in man: promotion of fecal steroid excretion by infusion of reconstituted HDL. Atheroscler Suppl. 2002;3:23–30. doi: 10.1016/S1567-5688(02)00047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Movva R, Rader DJ. Laboratory assessment of HDL heterogeneity and function. Clin Chem. 2008;54:788–800. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.101923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yancey PG, Bortnick AE, Kellner-Weibel G, de la Llera-Moya M, Phillips MC, Rothblat GH. Importance of different pathways of cellular cholesterol efflux. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:712–719. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000057572.97137.DD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rothblat GH, de la Llera-Moya M, Atger V, Kellner-Weibel G, Williams DL, Phillips MC. Cell cholesterol efflux: integration of old and new observations provides new insights. J Lipid Res. 1999;40:781–796. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ji Y, Jian B, Wang N, et al. Scavenger receptor BI promotes high density lipoprotein-mediated cellular cholesterol efflux. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:20982–20985. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.34.20982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lee JY, Parks JS. ATP-binding cassette transporter AI and its role in HDL formation. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2005;16:19–25. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200502000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wittenburg H, Carey MC. Biliary cholesterol secretion by the twinned sterol half-transporters ABCG5 and ABCG8. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:605–609. doi: 10.1172/JCI0216548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yu L, Li-Hawkins J, Hammer RE, et al. Overexpression of ABCG5 and ABCG8 promotes biliary cholesterol secretion and reduces fractional absorption of dietary cholesterol. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:671–680. doi: 10.1172/JCI0216001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lee J. Introduction of a model for study of polarized cholesterol and phospholipid efflux in gallbladder epithelial cells. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2002;39:216–225. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lee J, Tauscher A, Seo DW, Oram JF, Kuver R. Cultured gallbladder epithelial cells synthesize apolipoproteins A-I and E. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;285:G630–G641. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00101.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lee J, Choi HS. Reverse cholesterol transport in cultured gallbladder epithelial cells. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2004;43:145–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Choi HS, No NY, Lee J, et al. ABCA1 expression of human gallbladder tissue in various gallbladder diseases. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2003;41(abstr):599A. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Choi HS. The biology of the cholangiocytes. Hanyang Med Rev. 2007;27:4–12. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lee J. Transporters and nuclear hormone receptors associated with cholesterol metabolism in gallbladder epithelial cells. Hanyang Med Rev. 2007;27:20–28. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lee J, Hong EM, Byun HW, et al. The effect of PPARalpha and PPARgamma ligands on inflammation and ABCA1 expression in cultured gallbladder epithelial cells. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1707–1715. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0029-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lee J, Hong EM, Koh DH, et al. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) activate expression of PPARalpha/PPARgamma and ABCA1 in cultured gallbladder epithelial cells. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:292–299. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0734-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Marzioni M, Saccomanno S, Candelaresi C, et al. Clinical implications of novel aspects of biliary pathophysiology. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42:238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Maroni L, Haibo B, Ray D, et al. Functional and structural features of cholangiocytes in health and disease. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;1:368–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2015.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Pellicciari R, Fiorucci S, Camaioni E, et al. 6alpha-ethyl-chenode-oxycholic acid (6-ECDCA), a potent and selective FXR agonist endowed with anticholestatic activity. J Med Chem. 2002;45:3569–3572. doi: 10.1021/jm025529g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sinal CJ, Tohkin M, Miyata M, Ward JM, Lambert G, Gonzalez FJ. Targeted disruption of the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR impairs bile acid and lipid homeostasis. Cell. 2000;102:731–744. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cohen BI, Hofmann AF, Mosbach EH, et al. Differing effects of nor-ursodeoxycholic or ursodeoxycholic acid on hepatic histology and bile acid metabolism in the rabbit. Gastroenterology. 1986;91:189–197. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90457-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hohenester S, Wenniger LM, Paulusma CC, et al. A biliary HCO3-umbrella constitutes a protective mechanism against bile acid-induced injury in human cholangiocytes. Hepatology. 2012;55:173–183. doi: 10.1002/hep.24691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Iwai M, Shimazu T. Alteration in sympathetic nerve activity during liver regeneration in rats after partial hepatectomy. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1992;41:209–214. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(92)90060-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.LeSage GD, Alvaro D, Glaser S, et al. Alpha-1 adrenergic receptor agonists modulate ductal secretion of BDL rats via Ca(2+)- and PKC-dependent stimulation of cAMP. Hepatology. 2004;40:1116–1127. doi: 10.1002/hep.20424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Francis H, LeSage G, DeMorrow S, et al. The alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist UK 14,304 inhibits secretin-stimulated ductal secretion by downregulation of the cAMP system in bile duct-ligated rats. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;293:C1252–C1262. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00031.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Marzioni M, Ueno Y, Glaser S, et al. Cytoprotective effects of taurocholic acid feeding on the biliary tree after adrenergic denervation of the liver. Liver Int. 2007;27:558–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01443.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Glaser S, Alvaro D, Francis H, et al. Adrenergic receptor agonists prevent bile duct injury induced by adrenergic denervation by increased cAMP levels and activation of Akt. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G813–G826. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00306.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Marzioni M, Alpini G, Saccomanno S, et al. Endogenous opioids modulate the growth of the biliary tree in the course of cholestasis. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1831–1847. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Alvaro D, Metalli VD, Alpini G, et al. The intrahepatic biliary epithelium is a target of the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor 1 axis. J Hepatol. 2005;43:875–883. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Gaudio E, Barbaro B, Alvaro D, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates rat cholangiocyte proliferation via an autocrine mechanism. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1270–1282. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Gaudio E, Barbaro B, Alvaro D, et al. Administration of r-VEGF-A prevents hepatic artery ligation-induced bile duct damage in bile duct ligated rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;291:G307–G317. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00507.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Drucker DJ. Biological actions and therapeutic potential of the glucagon-like peptides. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:531–544. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.31068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Marzioni M, Alpini G, Saccomanno S, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 and its receptor agonist exendin-4 modulate cholangiocyte adaptive response to cholestasis. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:244–255. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Hanada S, Harada M, Koga H, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma directly impair epithelial barrier function in cultured mouse cholangiocytes. Liver Int. 2003;23:3–11. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2003.01707.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Spirlì C, Fabris L, Duner E, et al. Cytokine-stimulated nitric oxide production inhibits adenylyl cyclase and cAMP-dependent secretion in cholangiocytes. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:737–753. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Eksteen B, Miles A, Curbishley SM, et al. Epithelial inflammation is associated with CCL28 production and the recruitment of regulatory T cells expressing CCR10. J Immunol. 2006;177:593–603. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Karrar A, Broomé U, Södergren T, et al. Biliary epithelial cell antibodies link adaptive and innate immune responses in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1504–1514. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Salas JT, Banales JM, Sarvide S, et al. Ae2a,b-deficient mice develop antimitochondrial antibodies and other features resembling primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1482–1493. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Moritoki Y, Lian ZX, Lindor K, et al. B-cell depletion with anti-CD20 ameliorates autoimmune cholangitis but exacerbates colitis in transforming growth factor-beta receptor II dominant negative mice. Hepatology. 2009;50:1893–1903. doi: 10.1002/hep.23238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Tsuda M, Moritoki Y, Lian ZX, et al. Biochemical and immunologic effects of rituximab in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Hepatology. 2012;55:512–521. doi: 10.1002/hep.24748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Lleo A, Gershwin ME, Mantovani A, Invernizzi P. Towards common denominators in primary biliary cirrhosis: the role of IL-12. J Hepatol. 2012;56:731–733. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.05.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hirschfield GM, Liu X, Xu C, et al. Primary biliary cirrhosis associated with HLA, IL12A, and IL12RB2 variants. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2544–2555. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Eaton JE, Talwalkar JA, Lazaridis KN, Gores GJ, Lindor KD. Pathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis and advances in diagnosis and management. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:521–536. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.06.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Liaskou E, Karikoski M, Reynolds GM, et al. Regulation of mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 expression in human and mice by vascular adhesion protein 1 amine oxidase activity. Hepatology. 2011;53:661–672. doi: 10.1002/hep.24085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Moon HJ, Finney J, Ronnebaum T, Mure M. Human lysyl oxidase-like 2. Bioorg Chem. 2014;57:231–241. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]