Summary
Clearance of misfolded and aggregated proteins is central to cell survival. Here, we describe a new pathway for maintaining protein homeostasis mediated by the proteasome shuttle factor UBQLN2. The 26S proteasome degrades polyubiquitylated substrates by recognizing them through stoichiometrically bound ubiquitin receptors, but substrates are also delivered by reversibly bound shuttles. We aimed to determine why these parallel delivery mechanisms exist and found that UBQLN2 acts with the HSP70-HSP110 disaggregase machinery to clear protein aggregates via the 26S proteasome. UBQLN2 recognizes client-bound HSP70 and links it to the proteasome to allow for the degradation of aggregated and misfolded proteins. We further show that this process is active in the cell nucleus, where another system for aggregate clearance, autophagy, does not act. Finally, we found that mutations in UBQLN2, which lead to neurodegeneration in humans, are defective in chaperone binding, impair aggregate clearance, and cause cognitive deficits in mice.
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
-
•
UBQLN2 clears aggregates independent of autophagy via HSP70 and the proteasome
-
•
A disease mutation in UBQLN2 prevents its binding to HSP70
-
•
Mutant UBQLN2 is defective in clearance of aggregates in vivo
-
•
UBQLN2 knockin mice develop cognitive impairment and brain pathology
The proteasome teams up with partner proteins to clear tightly aggregated, potentially toxic species from the nucleus.
Introduction
The modification of proteins with ubiquitin regulates most cellular pathways. A major role for ubiquitylation is to target proteins for degradation via the 26S proteasome, forming the so-called ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) (Glickman and Ciechanover, 2002). Ubiquitin chains are built on substrates by E3 ubiquitin ligases, which link the first ubiquitin via its C terminus to the ε-amino group of an internal lysine residue of the substrate, followed by the conjugation of subsequent ubiquitin moieties to a lysine of the preceding ubiquitin (Thrower et al., 2000, Shabek et al., 2012, Lu et al., 2015). Specificity in the UPS is largely mediated by the ∼600 E3 ubiquitin ligases that recognize their cognate substrates, but there is also selectivity on the level of delivery to the 26S proteasome, as ubiquitylated proteins are either directly recognized by the proteasome through stoichiometric subunits (RPN10 and RPN13) or through loosely associated shuttle factors, which link polyubiquitylated proteins and the proteasome to facilitate degradation. Budding yeast has three shuttles: Dsk2, Rad23, and Ddi1 (Verma et al., 2004, Elsasser et al., 2004). These have an N-terminal ubiquitin-like (UBL) domain, which interacts with the proteasome (Elsasser et al., 2002, Saeki et al., 2002), and a C-terminal ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain, which binds polyubiquitylated proteins. They also all contain domains between the UBL and UBA domains, whose functions are largely unexplored. An important observation is that UBL-UBA domain proteins act as inhibitors of proteasomal degradation when overexpressed (Kleijnen et al., 2000, Chen and Madura, 2002, Funakoshi et al., 2002, Raasi and Pickart, 2003). It is thus vital to study these proteins at endogenous levels, as even small increases in their abundance inhibit proteasomal degradation (Verma et al., 2004). Similarly, overexpression of Dsk2 in yeast cells causes cell-cycle arrest and cell death (Matiuhin et al., 2008), and overexpressing UBQLN in Drosophila leads to photoreceptor neurodegeneration (Ganguly et al., 2008).
Most vertebrates contain four homologs of the yeast protein Dsk2, which are named ubiquilin-1–4 (UBQLN1–4). While UBQLN1, 2, and 4 are expressed widely, UBQLN3 is restricted to testis (Marín, 2014). Part of the central region of UBQLN2 contains domains with homology to a heat shock binding protein called STI1, which binds Stch (HSP13), a protein similar to HSP70 (Kaye et al., 2000). UBQLN1, 2, and 4 each contain four such STI1 domains and can all interact with Stch (Lim et al., 2006, Wang et al., 2011, Rual et al., 2005), although the physiological role for this is currently unclear. UBQLN2 is mutated in familial cases of the protein folding disorder amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (Deng et al., 2011), and intriguingly, all familial mutations cluster to the PXXP motif, which is unique to UBQLN2 and of unknown function (Deng et al., 2011, Fahed et al., 2014, Williams et al., 2012, Vengoechea et al., 2013) (Figure 1A).
The existence of shuttle factors is puzzling, and it is unclear why not all polyubiquitylated proteins are recognized by the intrinsic ubiquitin receptors of the proteasome. An attractive possibility is that shuttle factors add functionality to the proteasomal machinery to enable degradation of specialized substrates. We have explored this by studying the mammalian proteasome shuttle factor UBQLN2.
Results
UBQLN2 Is Required for Survival after Proteotoxic Stress
To better understand the role of UBQLN2 and its relevance to neurodegenerative disease, we isolated its binding partners from mouse brain using immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry. UBQLN2 most evidently bound to HSP70-type chaperones, UBQLN1 and UBQLN4 (Figure 1B), and to a lesser extent to proteasomal subunits (Figure 1B).
Thus, UBQLN2 may be involved in the regulation of misfolded proteins. Indeed, UBQLN2 depletion by small interfering RNA (siRNA) caused hyper-sensitivity to heat shock, with a drop in cell viability comparable to the level observed after depletion of HSP70 (HSPA1A; Figure 1C).
Previous work showed that UBQLN2 binds to a range of protein aggregates in patient brains (Mori et al., 2012). We established that endogenous UBQLN2 similarly co-purifies with ubiquitylated insoluble protein aggregates generated by heat shock (Figure 1D), along with HSP70 and the proteasome (Figure 1E). Under non-stressed conditions (Figure 1D) or after heat shock of pre-lysed cells (Figure S1A), endogenous UBQLN2 is soluble, suggesting that UBQLN2 is not itself heat-unstable but rather actively recruited to aggregates. Interestingly, UBQLN1 and UBQLN4 remained soluble after heat stress (Figure 1F), which was surprising given their homology to UBQLN2.
Strikingly, we detected strongly increased binding of UBQLN2 to the proteasome and polyubiquitylated proteins after heat shock (Figure 1G), as well as enhanced binding to HSP70 (Figure 1H), suggesting the protein becomes activated under stress. UBQLN2 is not upregulated after heat shock (Figure S1B), indicating that it may instead be held in a repressed state under non-stressed conditions. Indeed, heat shock resulted in a loss of binding to other UBQLNs, consistent with a model where heterologous UBQLN complexes represent dormant reservoirs (Figure 1I).
UBQLN2 Is a Proteasome Shuttle that Acts with the HSP70 System to Clear Aggregated Proteins
Heat shock generates aggregates of polyubiquitylated proteins insoluble in up to 1% SDS (Figure S1C), which are cleared by the proteasome (Figure 2A; Figure S1D). We found that siRNA depletion of UBQLN2 resulted in a pronounced defect in the clearance of heat-induced insoluble ubiquitin conjugates (Figure 2A) but did not affect their accumulation (Figure S1E), supporting a role of UBQLN2 in protein aggregate clearance. Large aggregates are thought to be degraded by a proteolytic mechanism called autophagy. Thus, we examined autophagy-defective atg5 knockout cells and found that these were just as capable as wild-type cells in clearing heat-induced aggregates (Figure 2B). In contrast, proteasomal inhibition led to a complete abrogation of clearance for both wild-type and atg5 knockout cells (Figure 2B). Clearance also required UBQLN2, as atg5 knockout cells where UBQLN2 was downregulated also no longer efficiently cleared the aggregates (Figure 2C). These results demonstrate that UBQLN2 mediates degradation of insoluble heat-shock-induced aggregates through the proteasomal pathway, independently of autophagy.
We next depleted HSP70 by siRNA and observed that HSP70 was also required to clear heat shock aggregates (Figure 2D). HSP70-mediated disaggregase activity requires the co-chaperone HSP110 (HSP105 in mice) (Nillegoda et al., 2015). To investigate whether UBQLN2 acts with the HSP70/HSP110 disaggregase pathway, we examined HSP110 (mHSP105) knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (Nakamura et al., 2008) and found that in these cells, interaction of both HSP70 and ubiquitin conjugates with UBQLN2 was increased even in the absence of heat stress (Figure 2E). This result suggested that in cells lacking HSP110, UBQLN2 becomes activated due to a higher aggregate load. In addition, heat shock induced a dramatic increase in the amount of UBQLN2, proteasome, and ubiquitin conjugates in the insoluble fraction of HSP110 knockout MEFs (Figure 2F), which also were impaired in their ability to clear heat shock aggregates (Figure 2G). These results demonstrate that UBQLN2 and the HSP70-HSP110 disaggregase act in the same pathway, and they explain how aggregates are processed by the chaperones prior to UBQLN2-mediated proteasomal degradation.
We next tested if UBQLN2 also mediates the degradation of unfolded proteins independent of heat stress. The antibiotic puromycin leads to the accumulation of unfolded nascent polypeptide chains (Eggers et al., 1997), and we found that UBQLN2 depletion impaired the clearance of these faulty translation products (Figure 2H), while UBQLN2 levels remained unchanged (Figure S2C).
Since many protein aggregates are found in the nucleus, where autophagy does not act, we next tested if UBQLN2 can enter the nucleus to clear protein aggregates. Using both biochemical fractionation (Figure 2I; Figure S2A) and immunofluorescence (Figure 2J), we found that UBQLN2 translocates into the nucleus upon heat stress, similar to HSP70 and other quality control components (Velazquez and Lindquist, 1984, Park et al., 2013). This did not happen using puromycin (Figure S2B), which generates unfolded proteins in the cytoplasm. To test if UBQLN2 clears nuclear substrates, we used cells stably expressing GFPu-NLS (Bennett et al., 2005), a model unfolded nuclear protein. Heat shock causes aggregation of GFPu-NLS (Figures S2D and S2E) and results in interaction of UBQLN2 with GFPu-NLS (Figure S2F), coinciding with nuclear translocation of UBQLN2. Moreover, the proteasomal degradation of GFPu-NLS after heat shock was dependent on UBQLN2 (Figure S2G), demonstrating that UBQLN2 can clear nuclear aggregates.
We next examined the requirement of UBQLN2 for the clearance of a pathological Huntingtin fragment (HTTQ103), as UBQLN2 has been described to bind to aggregates in mouse models and patients with Huntington’s disease (HD) (Doi et al., 2004, Rutherford et al., 2013). We detected recruitment of endogenous UBQLN2 to HTT aggregates (Figure 2K), alongside HSP70 and the 26S proteasome (Figures S3A and S3B). We next found that the insoluble fraction from cells expressing GFP-HTTQ103, but not non-pathological GFP-HTTQ25, is retained on a filter trap alongside endogenous UBQLN2 (Figure 2L). HTTQ103 aggregates are retained in the stacking gel in SDS-PAGE, where we found that they also trap endogenous UBQLN2 (Figure S3C), and downregulation of UBQLN2 led to increased HTTQ103 aggregation (Figure 2M). Thus, UBQLN2 regulates degradation of model and disease-linked aggregation-prone proteins. Importantly, we demonstrate that the UBQLN2/HSP70/26S-proteasome pathway can clear aggregates in the nucleus.
UBQLN2 Mutations Do Not Lead to UBQLN2 Aggregation
We next examined the disease-linked mutations of UBQLN2 found in patients with familial ALS. Previous reports have suggested that both wild-type (WT) and mutant UBQLN2 aggregate, as exogenous expression leads to their localization to cytoplasmic foci similar in appearance to aggregates (Deng et al., 2011, Osaka et al., 2015). Indeed, exogenously expressing UBQLN2 in cells causes formation of cytosolic foci (Figure 3A), but no gross differences in size or number of foci were seen for mutant UBQLN2 (P506T, P497H) (Figure 3A). Importantly, mutating the UBA domain (L619A) to abolish ubiquitin binding (Figure 3B) leads to complete exclusion of both WT and mutant forms of UBQLN2 from the foci (Figure 3A), strongly suggesting the foci are not misfolded UBQLN2. The foci do not co-localize with as P bodies, stress granules (Figures S3D and S3E), or autophagosomes (Figure S3F). Furthermore, UBQLN2 foci formation does not render UBQLN2 insoluble, as UBQLN2 (WT) and five disease-linked mutants remained soluble when overexpressed in HEK293 cells (Figure S4E). Importantly, endogenous UBQLN2 is diffusely cytosolic (Figure 2J; Figure S4F).
Next, we used purified UBQLN2 to investigate the biophysical properties of the WT and mutant proteins (Figure S4A). Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments using WT and two mutant forms of UBQLN2 (P506T and P497H; Figure S4A) indicated that the mutations reduce the flexibility of the protein (Figure S4D). Based on circular dichroism measurements, there are no gross differences in secondary structure for any tested mutant (Figure 3C). Using analytical ultracentrifugation, we detected that both WT and mutant UBQLN2 forms dimers and trimers in a concentration-dependent manner but no higher-number oligomers or aggregates, which we also confirmed by size exclusion chromatography (Figure 3D; Figures S4B and S4C).
Disease-Linked UBQLN2 Mutation Impedes Binding to HSP70 Chaperones and Sensitizes Cells to Protein Folding Stress
As disease-linked mutant UBQLN2 did not aggregate, we next used stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) proteomics to investigate changes in the interactome of cells stably expressing inducible WT or mutant UBQLN2. We found that disease-linked UBQLN2 (P506T) showed decreased binding to HSP70 chaperones and increased binding to ubiquitin (Figure 4A). We next generated a mouse knockin of the equivalent human P506T mutation (mP520T) and confirmed these changes at the endogenous level using primary MEFs from male mice (UBQLN2 is X linked) (Figures 4B–4D; Figures S6A and S6B). Strikingly, the binding of UBQLN2 to HSP70, ubiquitylated substrates and the proteasome after heat shock was strongly attenuated for mutant UBQLN2 (Figure 4E). Also, while the heat-shock-induced nuclear translocation of mutant UBQLN2 (mP520T) was unaffected (Figure S5A), it was strongly impaired in its recruitment to aggregates (Figure 4F), and cells expressing UBQLN2 (mP520T) were hypersensitive to both heat shock and puromycin stress compared to their wild-type littermate counterparts (Figures 4G and 4H). Together, these data suggest that the disease-linked forms of UBQLN2 are loss-of-function mutations.
Since binding of UBQLN2 to HSP70 was unaffected by inhibiting stress inducible kinases or the ubiquitin E1 (Figures S5B and S5C) and recruitment of UBQLN2 to the insoluble fraction was also independent of ubiquitylation (Figure 5A), binding of UBQLN2 to HSP70 may in turn depend on client binding to HSP70.
To test this, we used an in vitro system to examine the effect of protein aggregates on the UBQLN2-HSP70 interaction. Strikingly, the interaction between HSP70 and UBQLN2 was only induced when reactions also contained HSP70 client in the form of either mildly denatured (42°C for 30 min; Figure 5B; Figure S5D) or strongly denatured (95°C for 5 min; Figure S5E) recombinant luciferase. We next tested if the presence of HSP70 client would also result in the recruitment of purified human proteasomes (Figure 5C). Indeed, the interactions among HSP70, UBQLN2, and proteasomes in vitro were strongly induced by the addition of denatured luciferase, demonstrating that the presence of substrate leads to the formation of degradation complexes (Figure 5D).
We next asked if a relevant pathological aggregate would have the same effect on HSP70/UBQLN2 complex formation. For this, we added small amounts of brain extracts from wild-type or R6/2 HD model mice (Mangiarini et al., 1996) to the in vitro interaction experiments and found that only the R6/2 extract triggered the interaction between HSP70 and UBQLN2 (Figure 5E; Figure S5F). This effect was seen with WT UBQLN2, but strikingly not with the disease-linked UBQLN2 (P506T; Figure 5E), entirely corroborating our cell-based experiments. Thus, the data strongly support a model whereby binding of clients to HSP70 triggers interaction with UBQLN2, which then bridges binding to the proteasome to mediate degradation. For disease-linked UBQLN2, mutations no longer support interaction with client-bound HSP70 and aggregate clearance is impaired.
HSP70 can be roughly divided into two distinct domains, the N-terminal ATPase domain and the C-terminal substrate-binding domain, where also regulatory proteins such as the ubiquitin ligase CHIP bind (Zhang et al., 2015). We found that the C terminus of HSP70 is sufficient to bind UBQLN2, but unlike for the full-length protein, the interaction was constitutive and not regulated by heat shock (Figure 5F). We also tested if the PXXP motif is required for interaction; however, deletion of the PXXP motif had no effect on HSP70 binding, demonstrating that this region is not the direct binding site (Figure S5G). Instead, it is likely that the PXXP mutations interfere indirectly with HSP70 binding.
UBQLN2 Mutation Leads to Cognitive Impairment and Inclusion Body Pathology in Mice
After confirming decreased UBQLN2-HSP70 binding in knockin mouse brain (Figure 5G), we undertook a longitudinal behavioral study to determine the effect on mouse behavior. Using novel object recognition tests, where the time that a mouse spends exploring a novel versus familiar object is measured, we observed that mutant UBQLN2 (mP520T) animals were no longer able to distinguish between novel and familiar objects at 12 months of age (Figure 5H). Similarly, in novel place recognition tests (Figure 5I), mutant animals were incapable of distinguishing an object in a new location at both 9 and 12 months of age. Thus, UBQLN2 (mP520T) knockin mice develop cognitive deficits with age.
As patients also have motor defects, we tested the UBQLN2 (mP520T) knockin animals using gait and rotarod analysis (Figures S6C–S6E) but observed no gross defects in either assay, although mutant mice presented with a slightly shorter stride length (Figure S6C). To assess if the cognitive deficits were accompanied by pathological changes, we performed immunohistochemical analyses on CNS tissues from 15- to 18-month-old mice. We observed regionalized UBQLN2 and p62 inclusion pathology in the hippocampus, cortex, and brainstem of mutant, but not WT, mice (Figure 5J). Interestingly, UBQLN2 is prominently present in the pellet fraction in hippocampal, but not cortical or cerebellar, tissue, despite similar expression levels (Figure 5K; Figures S7A and S7B). Importantly, our combined behavioral and histological findings demonstrate that UBQLN2 (mP520T) knockin mice recapitulate cognitive and pathological features of UBQLN2-associated neurodegeneration.
UBQLN2 Mutation Impairs the Clearance of Protein Aggregates In Vivo
To examine the role of UBQLN2 in handling aggregating clients in vivo, we turned to mutant Huntingtin (HTT) as a representative model. Using the R6/2 transgenic mouse (Mangiarini et al., 1996) and the HdhQ150 knockin mouse model (Lin et al., 2001), we found that immunoprecipitated UBQLN2 only associated with aggregated, but not SDS-soluble, HTT in vivo (Figures 6A and 6B). In both mouse models, binding of UBQLN2 to HTT was age- and disease-stage specific and only occurred once HTT had aggregated. HTT fragments passively diffuse into the nucleus in neurons, where they are retained upon aggregation (Cornett et al., 2005). Importantly, nuclear aggregation of HTT in both mouse models led to a translocation of UBQLN2, but not UBQLN1, to the nucleus (Figure 6C; Figure S7D). A proportion of HSP70 was present in nuclei at all ages (Figure 6C), and importantly, aggregate-associated HSP70 was trapped in the stacking gel in UBQLN2 immunoprecipitations from R6/2 brains (Figure S7E). Thus, mouse UBQLN2 behaves identically in HD mouse brains to UBQLN2 in cultured cells after heat shock.
Moreover, UBQLN2 and HTT were co-captured by a ubiquitin binding resin (Hjerpe et al., 2009) (TUBE; Figure 6D), demonstrating that HTT-UBQLN2 complexes contain ubiquitin, suggesting they may be cleared by the proteasome.
To directly test if UBQLN2 regulates HTT aggregation in vivo, we crossed R6/2 mice with UBQLN2 mP520T mutant knockin mice and observed a pronounced and significant increase of aggregated HTT, and a concomitant decrease of soluble HTT (Figure 6E). UBQLN2 co-localized with HTT inclusions (Figure S7D), and the number of nuclear HTT aggregates was significantly higher in the cortex of R6/2; mP520T double mutant animals compared to the R6/2 animals (Figure 6F). Moreover, a Seprion ligand assay shows significantly higher aggregate load in double-mutant brains, independently confirming our western blot and immunofluorescence analysis (Figure 6G). Thus, UBQLN2 mediates the clearance of protein aggregates in vivo, and the disease-linked forms of UBQLN2 are loss-of-function mutations, resulting in a failure to clear aggregating proteins.
Discussion
Proteasome Shuttle Factors as a Route for Protein Degradation
Degradation through the UPS is the major cellular mechanism of selective protein turnover. We have shown that the shuttle factor UBQLN2 works with the HSP70 system for proteasomal degradation of insoluble ubiquitylated protein aggregates. UBQLN2 does this by coupling recognition of HSP70-bound clients with its proteasome shuttle properties. UBQLN2 binding to ubiquitylated proteins and the proteasome is negligible under resting conditions, suggesting it is constitutively held in an inactive state. Accumulation of clients results in an activation of UBQLN2, mediated by recognizing client-bound HSP70, where binding to ubiquitylated substrates is induced and degradation facilitated.
UBQLN2 Integrates the Chaperone Network with the UPS to Clear Protein Aggregates
UBQLN2 is needed both for aggregate clearance and survival after proteotoxic stress, suggesting that it is an integral component of the proteostasis network similar to HSP70 (Labbadia and Morimoto, 2015). Our finding that efficient binding of UBQLN2 to HSP70 requires the presence of HSP70 clients integrates the chaperone network with the UPS.
Our conclusions are summarized in Figure 7. Briefly, under resting conditions, UBQLN2 is inactive and bound to other UBQLNs and itself. Activation of UBQLN2 occurs when HSP70 binds to client proteins, triggering exposure of a UBQLN2 binding site. A structural change in HSP70 mediated by client binding would provide efficient and fast means of activating degradation, while ensuring that complexes are only formed in the presence of unfolded client. Activation of UBQLN2 also allows binding of 26S proteasome to form a degradation-competent complex. Interestingly, initial complex formation among client-bound HSP70, UBQLN2, and proteasome does not require polyubiquitylation of the client. However, ubiquitin is an integral part of proteasomal degradation, and heat-shock-induced aggregated proteins are ubiquitylated. Ubiquitylation of an HSP70 client could thus take place with UBQLN2 already present in the complex and may enhance UBQLN2 affinity, committing the client to proteasomal degradation. This model explains why we observe the inducible binding of UBQLN2 to ubiquitylated proteins after heat shock. Moreover, it is very likely that translocation into the proteolytic chamber and degradation of the substrate by the proteasome requires polyubiquitylation of the client, even though initial complex formation does not. Whether a client is refolded by HSP70 or degraded by UBQLN2/UPS may ultimately be a question of its residence time on HSP70.
The HSP70-UBQLN2-Proteasome Pathway Provides an Autophagy-Independent Means for Clearing Protein Aggregates
Since proteasomes can only accommodate single unfolded polypeptide chains and not large aggregates, it has been assumed that the proteasome cannot degrade these. We demonstrate that the proteasome can clear aggregates through a UBQLN2-HSP70 pathway but suggest aggregates are first solubilized by HSP70-HSP110 disaggregase activity. Lending support to this idea, we show that the HSP70 cofactor HSP110, which is part of the HSP70-mediated disaggregase (Nillegoda et al., 2015), is also required for the efficient clearance of heat shock aggregates. UBQLN2 likely binds to HSP70 associated to both insoluble and soluble misfolded proteins as part of an ongoing disaggregation and clearance activity, which explains our observation that UBQLN2 co-purifies with insoluble ubiquitylated aggregates. This model is consistent with previous reports that demonstrate that aggregates exist in equilibrium between soluble and insoluble states (Yamamoto et al., 2000), and we propose that the soluble fraction is degraded by the proteasome, while autophagy may manage larger insoluble structures. Critically, we show that UBQLN2 can clear aggregates in the nucleus, where autophagy is absent (Lu et al., 2014).
UBQLN2 Loss-of-Function Mutations Lead to Disease Due to Loss of HSP70 Binding
It has been unclear whether UBQLN2 mutations cause disease through loss of function or toxic gain of function. We found that a disease-linked mutation led to a pronounced sensitivity to proteotoxic stress, effectively phenocopying the effect of UBQLN2 depletion, strongly suggesting a loss-of-function mutation. Our data demonstrate that this defect is due to impaired interaction with HSP70, ultimately leading to defective aggregate clearance (Figure 7). Interestingly, translocation of UBQLN2 into the nucleus was not affected by the disease mutation, suggesting that this aspect of the stress response is independent of HSP70 binding. This makes sense, as our model predicts that activation of UBQLN2 would rely upon association to client-bound HSP70, and it is unlikely that such a complex would be formed in the cytoplasm and then driven into the nucleus. However, the mechanism by which UBQLN2 is tranlsocated into the nucleus as inactive species is currently unclear.
We also found that the mutant form of UBQLN2 binds slightly more polyubiquitin than the WT under unstressed conditions. The reason is not apparent, but it may be due to UBQLN2 occasionally dissociating from its inactive state under resting conditions, leading to binding to polyubiquitylated proteins and a possible delay of mutant UBQLN2 in returning to its inhibited state. This difference is dramatically swamped under stress conditions, where ubiquitin binding by mutant UBQLN2 is significantly decreased versus the WT protein.
Together, our data provide a mechanistic understanding of UBQLN2, which in the future may allow for the design of small molecules to mediate the therapeutic activation of UBQLN2 in patients with diseases of protein aggregation.
Experimental Procedures
Animal Work
UBQLN2 P520T constitutive knock-in mice were created and supplied by Taconic/Artemis. R6/2 mice were maintained as previously described (Bett et al., 2006). Mice were bred at the University of Dundee and Kings College London in accordance with European Union and Home Office regulations. Work was approved by the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) from the University of Dundee and was performed with a UK Home Office project license. R6/2 males were bred with heterozygous UBQLN2 P520T females at Charles River Laboratories (UK).
Cell Culture and Cell Lines
Cells stably expressing inducible FLAG-UBQLN2 WT, P506T, P497H, L619A, P506T/L619A, P497H/L619A, HTTQ25-GFP, and HTTQ103-GFP were created using T-Rex HEK293 (Life Technologies, R710-07). Stably expressing cells were maintained in DMEM (Life Technologies, 11995-065), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 50 U/ml penicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies, 15070-063), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 μg/ml hygromycin (Invivogen, ant-hg-1bl), and 15 μg/ml blasticidin (Invivogen, ant-bl-1). Expression was induced with 2–5 ng/ml doxycycline. U2OS cells, HEK293 cells, and MEFs were maintained as above but without hygromycin and blasticidin.
Solubility Experiments
Cells were heat shocked at the indicated temperature for 2 hr followed by recovery at 37°C. Soluble and pellet fractions were generated by lysing cells in stringent lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCL, 2 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1.2% deoxycholate, 1.2% Triton-X, 200 mM iodoacetamide and cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]), sonicating (30% power 3 × 10 s pulses), and centrifugation at 17,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and represented the soluble fraction. The remaining pellet (insoluble fraction) was washed five times in PBS and re-suspended in Laemmli’s sample buffer. To generate the cytosolic-soluble, nuclear-soluble, and total-insoluble fractions, cells were first lysed in low-stringency buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCL, 0.08% NP-40, and cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]) followed by centrifugation at 17,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant (soluble fraction) was collected. The remaining pellet was washed five times in PBS prior to re-suspending in stringent lysis buffer, and soluble and insoluble fractions were generated as above. In this case, the supernatant represented the nuclear-soluble fraction and the pellet represented the total-insoluble fraction.
Cell Viability Assays
Cell viability assays were done by lysing cells in 50 mM Tris/phosphate (pH 7.8), 1.6 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, 2% Triton X-100, 30% glycerol, 1% BSA, 0.250 mM D-luciferin, 8 μM sodium pyrophosphate, and 500 ng QuantiLum recombinant Luciferase (Promega). Viability was determined using Envision 2104 plate reader (Perkin Elmer). Cells were heat shocked for 2 hr followed by 24 hr recovery prior to viability assay being carried out.
Antibodies
Sheep antibodies to UBQLN1, UBQLN2, and UBQLN4 were produced in house, raised against the following epitopes (residues numbered): mouse UBQLN1 482-515, mouse UBQLN2 11-27, human UBQLN2 478-518, mouse UBQLN4 84-161 (Figures S7F–S7J). Additional antibodies were FLAG-M2-peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich, A8592), HSP70 (Abcam, ab181606), GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology), Actin (Millipore, MAB1501R), anti-ubiquitin (Dako, Z 0458), GFP (Roche), Histone H4 (Abcam), histone H3B (Abcam), HTT (Bett et al., 2006), tubulin (Sigma), RPT6 (Enzo Life Sciences, BML PW9265), puromycin 12D10, (Millipore, MABE343). For immunofluorescence, anti-UBQLN2 from Novus Biologicals (NBP2-25164SS), anti-RPT3 (Bethyl Laboratories, A303-850A), and anti-GFP (Abcam, ab13970) were used. Secondary antibodies were from Bio-Rad (anti-mouse 170-5047; anti-rabbit 170-5046) and Abcam (anti-sheep ab97130). Protein-G horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was used for secondary detection in immunoprecipitations (Abcam, ab7460).
Author Contributions
R.H. and J.S.B. performed all of the experiments described with the exception of the biophysical experiments (analytical ultra centrifugation [AUC], circular dichroism [CD], and SAXS), which were performed by A.S., and the Seprion Ligand assay, which was performed by G.O. and G.B. A.K. and C.J. set up conditions for purification of UBQLN2. R.H. purified UBQLN2 for AUC, CD, and SAXS experiments. M.J.K. performed immunofluorescence staining of endogenous UBQLN2 after heat shock and of HTTQ103 cells. T.G.M. performed cardiac perfusions and mouse brain sub-dissections. F.M. performed IHC on mouse brains and analyzed pathology. I.S. purified human proteasome and aided in the characterization of in vitro complexes between UBQLN2 and the 26S proteasome with advice from M.H.G. A.K. provided all other purified proteins. M.T. and J.V. performed the mass spectrometry analyses. N.W. and M.W. generated cDNA clones. R.H. initiated the work on the effect of UBQLN2 mutations in vitro and in vivo and established the UBQLN2 interactome and its role in newly synthesized protein stress. J.S.B. initiated the work on the concept of UBQLN2 as a stress-activated proteasome shuttle in the clearance of heat-induced protein aggregates and in the in vivo clearance of HTT. R.H., J.S.B., and T.K. designed, interpreted, and analyzed the experiments and wrote the paper with contributions from all the other authors. T.K. conceived the project and supervised the work.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge technical support of the MRC Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, Elaine Forsyth for assistance with mouse work, the DNA Sequencing Service (coordinated by Nicholas Helps), Thomas Macartney and other members of the cloning team (coordinated by Rachel Toth and Mark Peggie), and the Protein Purification Team and Antibody Production Team (coordinated by Hilary McLauchlan and James Hastie). We thank Prof. Mike Cheetham (UCL) for providing HTT constructs and Prof. Ron Kopito (Stanford University) for providing GFPu-NLS cells. Special thanks to Dr. Katsuaki Inoue (beamline B21, Diamond Light Source, Didcot, UK) for help with SAXS data collection and primary data treatment and the Diamond Light Source for beamtime granted (proposal SM–5025–1). We thank Prof. Jeremy H. Lakey and Dr. Helen Waller for help in carrying out CD experiments, Mrs. Lynn Stevenson and Ms. Lynn Oxford (Veterinary Diagnostic Services, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow) for their technical assistance with immunohistochemistry, and Dr. Ian Ganley and Dr. Michael Munson for advice on autophagy-related experiments and for providing ATG5 KO cells and LC3 antibodies. We thank Professor Kazuhiro Nagata (Kyoto Sangyo University) for providing HSP105 KO cells. We thank John MacLeod for his assistance in anaesthetizing mice and Amnon Golan for aiding in purification and characterization of 26S proteasome from human cells. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC_MC_UU_12016/7), an ERC Starting Investigator Grant to T.K. (ERC_243019), a University of Glasgow Leadership Fellowship and Tenovus Scotland grant (to J.S.B.), the CDHI foundation (to G.B.), an Israel Science Foundation (ISF 909.14) grant (to M.H.G.), as well as the pharmaceutical companies supporting the Division of Signal Transduction Therapy Unit (AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Janssen Pharmaceutica, and Pfizer).
Published: July 28, 2016
Footnotes
Supplemental Information includes Supplemental Experimental Procedures and seven figures and can be found with this article online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.001.
Contributor Information
John S. Bett, Email: johnsbett@yahoo.co.uk.
Thimo Kurz, Email: thimo.kurz@glasgow.ac.uk.
Supplemental Information
References
- Bennett E.J., Bence N.F., Jayakumar R., Kopito R.R. Global impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by nuclear or cytoplasmic protein aggregates precedes inclusion body formation. Mol. Cell. 2005;17:351–365. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bett J.S., Goellner G.M., Woodman B., Pratt G., Rechsteiner M., Bates G.P. Proteasome impairment does not contribute to pathogenesis in R6/2 Huntington’s disease mice: exclusion of proteasome activator REGgamma as a therapeutic target. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006;15:33–44. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen L., Madura K. Rad23 promotes the targeting of proteolytic substrates to the proteasome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;22:4902–4913. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.13.4902-4913.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cornett J., Cao F., Wang C.-E., Ross C.A., Bates G.P., Li S.-H., Li X.-J. Polyglutamine expansion of huntingtin impairs its nuclear export. Nat. Genet. 2005;37:198–204. doi: 10.1038/ng1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deng H.-X., Chen W., Hong S.-T., Boycott K.M., Gorrie G.H., Siddique N., Yang Y., Fecto F., Shi Y., Zhai H. Mutations in UBQLN2 cause dominant X-linked juvenile and adult-onset ALS and ALS/dementia. Nature. 2011;477:211–215. doi: 10.1038/nature10353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doi H., Mitsui K., Kurosawa M., Machida Y., Kuroiwa Y., Nukina N. Identification of ubiquitin-interacting proteins in purified polyglutamine aggregates. FEBS Lett. 2004;571:171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.06.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eggers D.K., Welch W.J., Hansen W.J. Complexes between nascent polypeptides and their molecular chaperones in the cytosol of mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1997;8:1559–1573. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.8.1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elsasser S., Gali R.R., Schwickart M., Larsen C.N., Leggett D.S., Müller B., Feng M.T., Tübing F., Dittmar G.A.G., Finley D. Proteasome subunit Rpn1 binds ubiquitin-like protein domains. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002;4:725–730. doi: 10.1038/ncb845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elsasser S., Chandler-Militello D., Müller B., Hanna J., Finley D. Rad23 and Rpn10 serve as alternative ubiquitin receptors for the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:26817–26822. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404020200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fahed A.C., McDonough B., Gouvion C.M., Newell K.L., Dure L.S., Bebin M., Bick A.G., Seidman J.G., Harter D.H., Seidman C.E. UBQLN2 mutation causing heterogeneous X-linked dominant neurodegeneration. Ann. Neurol. 2014;75:793–798. doi: 10.1002/ana.24164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funakoshi M., Sasaki T., Nishimoto T., Kobayashi H. Budding yeast Dsk2p is a polyubiquitin-binding protein that can interact with the proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:745–750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012585199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganguly A., Feldman R.M.R., Guo M. ubiquilin antagonizes presenilin and promotes neurodegeneration in Drosophila. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008;17:293–302. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glickman M.H., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev. 2002;82:373–428. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hjerpe R., Aillet F., Lopitz-Otsoa F., Lang V., England P., Rodriguez M.S. Efficient protection and isolation of ubiquitylated proteins using tandem ubiquitin-binding entities. EMBO Rep. 2009;10:1250–1258. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaye F.J., Modi S., Ivanovska I., Koonin E.V., Thress K., Kubo A., Kornbluth S., Rose M.D. A family of ubiquitin-like proteins binds the ATPase domain of Hsp70-like Stch. FEBS Lett. 2000;467:348–355. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01135-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleijnen M.F., Shih A.H., Zhou P., Kumar S., Soccio R.E., Kedersha N.L., Gill G., Howley P.M. The hPLIC proteins may provide a link between the ubiquitination machinery and the proteasome. Mol. Cell. 2000;6:409–419. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00040-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Labbadia J., Morimoto R.I. Repression of the heat shock response is a programmed event at the onset of reproduction. Mol. Cell. 2015;59:639–650. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lim J., Hao T., Shaw C., Patel A.J., Szabó G., Rual J.-F., Fisk C.J., Li N., Smolyar A., Hill D.E. A protein-protein interaction network for human inherited ataxias and disorders of Purkinje cell degeneration. Cell. 2006;125:801–814. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin C.H., Tallaksen-Greene S., Chien W.M., Cearley J.A., Jackson W.S., Crouse A.B., Ren S., Li X.J., Albin R.L., Detloff P.J. Neurological abnormalities in a knock-in mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001;10:137–144. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu K., Psakhye I., Jentsch S. Autophagic clearance of polyQ proteins mediated by ubiquitin-Atg8 adaptors of the conserved CUET protein family. Cell. 2014;158:549–563. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu Y., Lee B.-H., King R.W., Finley D., Kirschner M.W. Substrate degradation by the proteasome: a single-molecule kinetic analysis. Science. 2015;348:1250834. doi: 10.1126/science.1250834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mangiarini L., Sathasivam K., Seller M., Cozens B., Harper A., Hetherington C., Lawton M., Trottier Y., Lehrach H., Davies S.W., Bates G.P. Exon 1 of the HD gene with an expanded CAG repeat is sufficient to cause a progressive neurological phenotype in transgenic mice. Cell. 1996;87:493–506. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81369-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marín I. The ubiquilin gene family: evolutionary patterns and functional insights. BMC Evol. Biol. 2014;14:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matiuhin Y., Kirkpatrick D.S., Ziv I., Kim W., Dakshinamurthy A., Kleifeld O., Gygi S.P., Reis N., Glickman M.H. Extraproteasomal Rpn10 restricts access of the polyubiquitin-binding protein Dsk2 to proteasome. Mol. Cell. 2008;32:415–425. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mori F., Tanji K., Odagiri S., Toyoshima Y., Yoshida M., Ikeda T., Sasaki H., Kakita A., Takahashi H., Wakabayashi K. Ubiquilin immunoreactivity in cytoplasmic and nuclear inclusions in synucleinopathies, polyglutamine diseases and intranuclear inclusion body disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;124:149–151. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-0999-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura J., Fujimoto M., Yasuda K., Takeda K., Akira S., Hatayama T., Takagi Y., Nozaki K., Hosokawa N., Nagata K. Targeted disruption of Hsp110/105 gene protects against ischemic stress. Stroke. 2008;39:2853–2859. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.506188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nillegoda N.B., Kirstein J., Szlachcic A., Berynskyy M., Stank A., Stengel F., Arnsburg K., Gao X., Scior A., Aebersold R. Crucial HSP70 co-chaperone complex unlocks metazoan protein disaggregation. Nature. 2015;524:247–251. doi: 10.1038/nature14884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osaka M., Ito D., Yagi T., Nihei Y., Suzuki N. Evidence of a link between ubiquilin 2 and optineurin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015;24:1617–1629. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park S.-H., Kukushkin Y., Gupta R., Chen T., Konagai A., Hipp M.S., Hayer-Hartl M., Hartl F.U. PolyQ proteins interfere with nuclear degradation of cytosolic proteins by sequestering the Sis1p chaperone. Cell. 2013;154:134–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raasi S., Pickart C.M. Rad23 ubiquitin-associated domains (UBA) inhibit 26 S proteasome-catalyzed proteolysis by sequestering lysine 48-linked polyubiquitin chains. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:8951–8959. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m212841200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rual J.-F., Venkatesan K., Hao T., Hirozane-Kishikawa T., Dricot A., Li N., Berriz G.F., Gibbons F.D., Dreze M., Ayivi-Guedehoussou N. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature. 2005;437:1173–1178. doi: 10.1038/nature04209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rutherford N.J., Lewis J., Clippinger A.K., Thomas M.A., Adamson J., Cruz P.E., Cannon A., Xu G., Golde T.E., Shaw G. Unbiased screen reveals ubiquilin-1 and -2 highly associated with huntingtin inclusions. Brain Res. 2013;1524:62–73. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saeki Y., Sone T., Toh-e A., Yokosawa H. Identification of ubiquitin-like protein-binding subunits of the 26S proteasome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002;296:813–819. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shabek N., Herman-Bachinsky Y., Buchsbaum S., Lewinson O., Haj-Yahya M., Hejjaoui M., Lashuel H.A., Sommer T., Brik A., Ciechanover A. The size of the proteasomal substrate determines whether its degradation will be mediated by mono- or polyubiquitylation. Mol. Cell. 2012;48:87–97. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thrower J.S., Hoffman L., Rechsteiner M., Pickart C.M. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J. 2000;19:94–102. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.1.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Velazquez J.M., Lindquist S. hsp70: nuclear concentration during environmental stress and cytoplasmic storage during recovery. Cell. 1984;36:655–662. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90345-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vengoechea J., David M.P., Yaghi S.R., Carpenter L., Rudnicki S.A. Clinical variability and female penetrance in X-linked familial FTD/ALS caused by a P506S mutation in UBQLN2. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Frontotemporal Degener. 2013;14:615–619. doi: 10.3109/21678421.2013.824001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verma R., Oania R., Graumann J., Deshaies R.J. Multiubiquitin chain receptors define a layer of substrate selectivity in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell. 2004;118:99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Huo K., Ma L., Tang L., Li D., Huang X., Yuan Y., Li C., Wang W., Guan W. Toward an understanding of the protein interaction network of the human liver. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011;7:536. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams K.L., Warraich S.T., Yang S., Solski J.A., Fernando R., Rouleau G.A., Nicholson G.A., Blair I.P. UBQLN2/ubiquilin 2 mutation and pathology in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Aging. 2012;33 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.05.008. e3–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto A., Lucas J.J., Hen R. Reversal of neuropathology and motor dysfunction in a conditional model of Huntington’s disease. Cell. 2000;101:57–66. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80623-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H., Amick J., Chakravarti R., Santarriaga S., Schlanger S., McGlone C., Dare M., Nix J.C., Scaglione K.M., Stuehr D.J. A bipartite interaction between Hsp70 and CHIP regulates ubiquitination of chaperoned client proteins. Structure. 2015;23:472–482. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.