Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1997 Dec;50(12):1010–1012. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.12.1010

The impact of blood culture reporting and clinical liaison on the empiric treatment of bacteraemia.

R J Cunney 1, E B McNamara 1, N Alansari 1, B Loo 1, E G Smyth 1
PMCID: PMC500382  PMID: 9516883

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the impact of blood culture results and early clinical liaison on the treatment of patients with bacteraemia. METHODS: 123 patients with significant positive blood cultures were followed over a nine month period in a 620 bed teaching hospital. The impact of early blood culture reporting and clinical liaison on the cost and appropriateness of treatment was assessed. RESULTS: Empiric treatment was started before the Gram stain result in 107 (87%) patients. Treatment was altered on the basis of the Gram stain result in 39 (36%) of these patients, and on culture and sensitivity results in 53 (50%). The spectrum of antibiotic treatment was narrowed in 58 (54%) of these; 20 (19%) on Gram stain result alone. This resulted in a 42% reduction in daily antibiotic costs in patients who had received empiric treatment. Empiric treatment did not follow the hospital antibiotic policy in 49 (46%) of the patients treated. In patients where empiric treatment was not in accordance with hospital policy, 21 (44%) had an isolate resistant to the empiric treatment used; while in patients who received agents in accordance with hospital policy only one (1.7%) had a resistant isolate (p < 0.05). Patients who died (11 (9%)) were less likely to have received empiric treatment in accordance with the antibiotic policy, although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Early reporting of Gram stain results from blood cultures, combined with early clinical liaison, results in more rational and cost effective treatment.

Full text

PDF
1010

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bamberger D. M., Dahl S. L. Impact of voluntary vs enforced compliance of third-generation cephalosporin use in a teaching hospital. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Mar;152(3):554–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doern G. V., Vautour R., Gaudet M., Levy B. Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1757–1762. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1757-1762.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edwards L. D., Levin S., Balagtas R., Lowe P., Landau W., Lepper M. H. Ordering patterns and utilization of bacteriologic culture reports. Arch Intern Med. 1973 Nov;132(5):678–682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sturm A. W. Rational use of antimicrobial agents and diagnostic microbiology facilities. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Aug;22(2):257–260. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.2.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Trenholme G. M., Kaplan R. L., Karakusis P. H., Stine T., Fuhrer J., Landau W., Levin S. Clinical impact of rapid identification and susceptibility testing of bacterial blood culture isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1342–1345. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1342-1345.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilkins E. G., Hickey M. M., Khoo S., Hale A. D., Umasankar S., Thomas P., Bhatti N., Dave J., Seal D., Larson E. Northwick Park Infection Consultation Service. Part I. The aims and operation of the service and the general distribution of infection identified by the service between September 1987 and July 1990 [see comment]. J Infect. 1991 Jul;23(1):47–56. doi: 10.1016/0163-4453(91)94041-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yuen K. Y., Seto W. H., Chau P. Y. An evaluation of inpatient consultations conducted by clinical microbiologists in a teaching hospital. J Infect. 1992 Jul;25(1):29–37. doi: 10.1016/0163-4453(92)93441-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES