Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1997 Dec;50(12):1022–1026. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.12.1022

Continuing medical education for pathologists: an evaluation of the Royal College of Pathologists' Wessex pilot scheme.

C du Boulay 1
PMCID: PMC500385  PMID: 9516886

Abstract

AIM: To discover the attitudes to continuing medical education (CME) of the Wessex pathologists who participated in the Wessex CME pilot scheme and to identify their preferences and difficulties in pursuing CME activities. METHOD: The views of pathologists in the scheme were collected during a period of one year using workshops and discussions. A confidential, anonymous postal questionnaire based on these issues was sent to the 103 pathologists in Wessex who participated in the pilot scheme. RESULTS: A 64% response rate was obtained. The respondents identified lack of time and funded study leave as major barriers to CME and highlighted the gap between CME activity and its recognition and funding by employers. They wanted a wide variety of locally based CME activities to be recognised, and they valued local activities that linked theory with practice. They believed that the college scheme tended to favour academic activities over more practical and locally based ones. They found the paired peer review process time consuming but valuable for identifying their learning needs in some cases, but demonstrated that they have mixed preferences about the way they do their CME. CONCLUSIONS: The Wessex pathologists believe that CME is important and have positive attitudes to it. Their attitudes to CME echo the current literature about what makes CME effective. Unless individuals' preferences and difficulties are taken into account, CME programmes in which they participate are not likely to succeed.

Full text

PDF
1022

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bates C. M. HIV medicine: drug side effects and interactions. Postgrad Med J. 1996 Jan;72(843):30–36. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.72.843.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Conn R. B. Can continuing medical education prepare the current practitioner for the 21st century? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992 Jun;116(6):602–604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis D. A., Thomson M. A., Oxman A. D., Haynes R. B. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):700–705. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.9.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Engel C. E., Browne E., Nyarango P., Akor S., Khwaja A., Karim A. A., Towle A. Problem-based learning in distance education: a first exploration in continuing medical education. Med Educ. 1992 Sep;26(5):389–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1992.tb00192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harden R. M., Laidlaw J. M. Effective continuing education: the CRISIS criteria. Med Educ. 1992 Sep;26(5):408–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hayes T. M. Continuing medical education: a personal view. BMJ. 1995 Apr 15;310(6985):994–996. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6985.994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jayawickramarajah P. T. How to evaluate educational programmes in the health professions. Med Teach. 1992;14(2-3):159–166. doi: 10.3109/01421599209079482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kelly M. H., Murray T. S. General practitioners' views on continuing medical education. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Oct;44(387):469–471. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewkonia R. M., Murray F. R. Grand rounds: a paradox in medical education. CMAJ. 1995 Feb 1;152(3):371–376. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mayne K. Practice-linked continuing medical education. Med J Aust. 1994 Nov 21;161(10):630–632. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb127647.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nicol F. Making reaccreditation meaningful. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jun;45(395):321–324. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh A. K. A role for the Fas antigen in lupus? Postgrad Med J. 1996 Jan;72(843):4–5. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.72.843.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Slaven A. E., Dixon A. K., Doyle T. C. An audit of clinico-radiologic conferences. Invest Radiol. 1994 Sep;29(9):859–863. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199409000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sylvester S. H. General practitioners' attitudes to professional reaccreditation. BMJ. 1993 Oct 9;307(6909):912–914. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6909.912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Troxel D. B., Sabella J. D. Problem areas in pathology practice. Uncovered by a review of malpractice claims. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994 Aug;18(8):821–831. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199408000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. al-Shehri A., Stanley I., Thomas P. Continuing education for general practice. 2. Systematic learning from experience. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Jun;43(371):249–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. du Boulay C. Audit of continuing medical education for pathologists: strategies and implications. J Clin Pathol. 1996 Feb;49(2):100–101. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.2.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES